DOCSLIB.ORG

Richard H. Day

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Richard H. Day RICHARD H. DAY Richard H. Day is Professor of Economics, Emeritus of the University of Southern California. He studied General Science at Iowa State University and, as an Honor Scholar, received the Bachelor of Science in June 1955. He attended Harvard University 1955-1958, received the Ph.D. degree in Economics in June 1961. His dissertation, published by North-Holland in 1963,, presented a class of "recursive programming" models for explaining production, investment and technological change in agriculture and industrial sectors. This work, originally sponsored by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, was the prototype for a U.S. National Model in the 1960s and for a variety of similar studies in a number of countries. His work at this time also included the derivation of sufficient conditions for aggregation in production models, estimates of the distribution of field crop yields, and an analysis of the effect of technological change on the migration from rural to urban centers. During the period 1959–1962, Day served in the U.S.A.F. as a mathematician and systems analyst and subsequently spent a brief stint as a consultant to Richard Reuter who was then Director of the Food for Peace Program and Special Assistant to President Kennedy. After joining the University of Wisconsin in 1963, with the support of the National Science Foundation, conducted recursive programming studies of the U.S. Coal, Steel and Petroleum Industries and of agricultural development in India. This work showed how structural change can be explained in economic terms and how it can completely transform a region or industry in less than a generation. These early studies and subsequent related reflections are reprised in the 2004 Cambridge volume The Divergent Dynamics of Economic Growth: Studies in Adaptive Economizing, Technological Change and Economic Development. The empirical studies of industrial and agricultural development became the basis for a dynamic theory describing economic change when agents are boundedly rational, when economic behavior is adaptive, when markets work out of equilibrium and when economic structure evolves, themes that he is continuing to develop. A recent mathematical expression of which was published in the Journal of Convex Analysis and Applications. Several nonlinear difference equation models of growth and business cycles were developed early in this work to illustrate various aspects of the general theory. These studies led him to introduce, in collaboration with Jess Benhabib, Wayne Shafer, and Giulio Pianigiani, mathematical chaos and ergodic theory into economic analysis. They demonstrate that irregular, random-like behavior is a generic possibility in models of economic change that incorporate significant nonlinearities. This work culminated in the two volume MIT book, Complex Economic Dynamics, published in 1994 and 2000. Day, with Sidney Winter, founded the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, serving as Editor through 2002. He is the author or coauthor of some 180 articles, 4 books, and editor of 9 others. He has been a visiting professor at Göttingen University, Harvard, MIT, the Princeton Institute for Advance Study, the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study, the University of Siena, the European University Institute, the University of Paris, and the University of Århus. He has lectured at many other universities in the U.S., Europe and Asia, and is currently Chairman of the International Advisory Board for the Max Planck Institute, Economics Unit in Jena. VITA Richard Hollis Day Professor Emeritus, University of Southern California May 2007 EDUCATION Iowa State University 1951-1955 B.S., Economics, June 1955 Harvard University 1955-1958 M.S., Economics, June 1961 Ph.D., Economics, June 1961 Doctoral Dissertation: "Recursive Programming and Production Response" PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Major Appointments U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economist, 1958-1959 USAF, Mathematician, Computer Programming and Systems Analysis, 1959-1962 University of Wisconsin, Assistant Professor of Economics and Agricultural Economics, 1962-1964; Associate Professor, 1965-1968; Professor, 1968- 1977. Göttingen University, Fulbright Lecturer in Economics and Visiting Professor, 1967-1968. University of Southern California, Professor of Economics, 1976-2006 University of Southern California, Professor Emeritus of Economics, 2006- The Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, N.J., Member 1978-1979 The Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study, Fellow, August 1984-August 1985. European University Institute, Distinguished Fulbright Lecturer, Florence, 1993. Max–Planck–Institut, Chairman, International Advisory Board, Economics Unit, 2004-. Selected Part-time or Temporary Appointments and Consulting Food for Peace Program, The White House, Consultant to the Director, 1962. General Electric Corporation, Computer Division, Consultant, 1962. Georgetown University, Lecturer, 1962. Southeast Wisconsin Development Commission, 1964. Rockefeller Foundation Study and Conference Center, Villa Serbelloni, Scholar in Residence, February-March, 1974. Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Visiting Professor, Summers, 1971, 1972, 1974, Honorary Fellow, 1971-1975, Visiting Scholar, May 1983. Harvard University, Honorary Research Associate, Department of Economics, 1975- 1976. 2 MIT System Dynamics Group, Sloan School, Honorary Research Associate, 1975- 1976. Electric Power Research Institute, Consultant, 1976-1982, 1988-1989. University of Paris IX, Dauphine, Centre de Recherche de Mathematiques de la Decision (CEREMADE), Visiting Research Associate, April 1976, April 1978; Membre Associe E'tranger, 1979, Visiting Professor, 1982. Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research, Stockholm, Visiting Scholar, Summer 1983-1984, July 1985, October 1986, November 1987, July 1988, June 1989, July 1990. University of Siena, Instituto di Matematica, Visiting Scholar, Summer 1988, Summer 1989, Summer, 1990. World Bank Project on Industrial Reform and Productivity in Chinese Enterprises, 1991–1992. United Nations Development Project, April 30–May 4, 1992. International Evaluation of Danish Research in the Social Sciences, Panel on Economics, 1995–1996. Art Meets Science and Economics, Speaker and Discussant, Royal Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, 1997. University of Paris 2, Visiting Professor, Fall 1998. Århus University, Denmark, Visiting Professor, May, 1998. Administrative Experience University of Wisconsin, Director, Computation Division SSRI, 1964-1967; Chairman, Social Systems Research Institute, 1968-1970. Econometric Society, Program Committee, 1966, 1969; Chairman of Program Committee, 1970; Standing Committee, 1970-1973. Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Program Chairman, 1974. Conference on Adaptive Economics, Co-Organizer, Mathematical Research Center, Madison, Wisconsin, 1974. Conference on the Dynamics of Market Economies, Co-Organizer, Stockholm, 1983. University of Southern California, Department Chair, 1976-1979, 1982 (Acting), 1987-1988; Modelling Research Group, Co-Director, 1976-1988. Conference on The Markets for Entrepreneurship, Ownership and Control, Co- Organizer, Stockholm, 1988. Workshop on Dynamical Economic Science, Co-Organizer, USC, April 1988. Conference on the Markets for Innovation, Ownership and Control, Co-Organizer, Stockholm, June 1988. International Symposium on Evolutionary Dynamics and Nonlinear Economics, Co- Chairman, University of Texas, Austin, April 1989. Conference on Econometric Estimation & Inference for Nonlinear, Dynamic Macroeconomic Models, Organizer, USC, April 1989. Second International Workshop on Dynamical Economic Sciences, Co-Organizer, Stockholm, June 1989. Western Economic Association International, Co-Organizer, Special Session, San Diego, CA, July 1999. 3 Editorial Activity Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Co–founder and Co–editor, 1980-1986; Editor, 1987–2002, Honorary Editor, 2002– Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Advisory Board, 1991– Behavioral Science, Board of Referees, 1973–1979. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Editorial Board, 1979–1980. Journal of Economic Development, Editorial Board, 1979– International Editorial Board of the Irving Fisher and Frank Taussig Awards Competition, 1976–1990. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Honorary Editor, 1997– Honors Econometric Society, Fellow, 1993–. Phi Kappa Phi Faculty Recognition Award for the book, Complex Economic Dynamics, Volume I, An Introduction to Dynamical Systems and Market Mechanisms. 4 I. JOURNAL ARTICLES, CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOOKS AND PROCEEDINGS 1. "Recursive Programming and Supply Prediction," Chapter 5 in Heady et al. (eds.), Agricultural Supply Functions. Iowa State University Press, pp. 108-125. 1961. 2. "Programming Absolute Priorities by Means of Input-Output Analysis," Artha Vijnana, 4:1-9, March 1962. 3. "An Approach to Production Response," Agricultural Economics Research, 14:134- 148, October 1962. 4. "Comments on Papers by Professor Fox and Sengupta," in Barna (ed.), Structural Interdependence and Economic Development, pp. 93-99, Macmillan, 1963. 5. "On Aggregating Linear Programming Models of Production," Journal of Farm Economics, 45:797-813, November 1963. 6. "Dynamic Coupling, Optimizing and Regional Interdependence," Journal of Farm Economics, 46:442-451, May 1964. 7. "Une Approche Pour L'Etude De La Production Agricole," Economic Rurals, No. 66, October 1965. Translators: P.F. Albert and J.M. Boussard. 8. "Probability Distributions of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building a Movement in the Non-Profit Industrial Complex
    Building A Movement In The Non-Profit Industrial Complex Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michelle Oyakawa Graduate Program in Sociology The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Korie Edwards, Advisor Andrew Martin Steve Lopez Copyrighted by Michelle Mariko Oyakawa 2017 Abstract Today, democracy in the United States is facing a major challenge: Wealthy elites have immense power to influence election outcomes and policy decisions, while the political participation of low-income people and racial minorities remains relatively low. In this context, non-profit social movement organizations are one of the key vehicles through which ordinary people can exercise influence in our political system and pressure elite decision-makers to take action on matters of concern to ordinary citizens. A crucial fact about social movement organizations is that they often receive significant financial support from elites through philanthropic foundations. However, there is no research that details exactly how non-profit social movement organizations gain resources from elites or that analyzes how relationships with elite donors impact grassroots organizations’ efforts to mobilize people to fight for racial and economic justice. My dissertation aims to fill that gap. It is an ethnographic case study of a multiracial statewide organization called the Ohio Organizing Collaborative (OOC) that coordinates progressive social movement organizations in Ohio. Member organizations work on a variety of issues, including ending mass incarceration, environmental justice, improving access to early childhood education, and raising the minimum wage. In 2016, the OOC registered over 155,000 people to vote in Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Financialization After the Crisis? How Finance (Still) Gets Its Way
    Dynamics of financialization after the crisis? How finance (still) gets its way Julie Froud Manchester Business School and Centre for Research in Socio‐Cultural Change (CRESC), UK Outline • Starting point: finance is not humbled, (despite current crisis, the resulting bailouts and large losses imposed in terms of foregone GDP and imposed austerity). But growing concerns about ‘imbalance’ • Explaining this as a story about power and elites, mainly about the UK (noting specificities of financialization), but with relevance elsewhere, by: a) looking back at C Wright Mills and b) moving forward with the finance and point value complex. • The aim is to highlight the pervasive, programmatic power of finance. To understand financialization, we have to understand many things. So, a contribution to a collective endeavour. (1) Finance unreformed The story so far… Unreformed finance a) investment banking • Half‐hearted reform in UK: limited structural change ‐> no major bank break‐up; ring fencing of investment banking, not separation; few constraints on long chain leveraged finance; (still) low capital requirements; bonuses survive (eg HSBC Feb 2014) and redundancies postponed • Scandals continue: Libor, exchange rate fixing (even after Libor) Collusion, manipulation of rates ‐> profit and bonus implications; Barclays Capital as ‘loose federation of money making franchises’ (not the ‘go‐to bank’). Finance Minister, George Osborne on Libor crisis: ‘we know what went wrong’…. No interest in learning. Unreformed finance b) retail banking • Half‐hearted reform in UK: more competition via ‘challenger banks’… (but not tackling business model, where RoE targets in mid‐teens drive mis‐selling eg Jenkins at Barclays: 15% RoE target in retail) • Scandals continue: ever more mis‐selling.
    [Show full text]
  • Hustle and Flow: Prison Privatization Fueling the Prison Industrial Complex
    FULCHER FINAL (DO NOT DELETE) 6/10/2012 2:43 PM Hustle and Flow: Prison Privatization Fueling the Prison Industrial Complex Patrice A. Fulcher* ABSTRACT The Prison Industrial Complex (“PIC”) is a profiteering system fueled by the economic interests of private corporations, federal and state correctional institutions, and politicians. The PIC grew from ground fertilized by an increase in the U.S. prison population united with an economically depressed market, stretched budgets, and the ineffective allocation of government resources. The role of the federal, state, and local governments in the PIC has been to allocate resources. This is the first of a series of articles exploring issues surrounding the PIC, including (1) prison privatization, (2) outsourcing the labor of prisoners for profit, and (3) constitutional misinterpretations. The U.S. prison population increased in the 1980s, in part, because of harsh drug and sentencing laws and the racial profiling of Blacks. When faced with the problem of managing additional inmates, U.S. correctional institutions looked to the promise of private prison companies to house and control inmates at reduced costs. The result was the privatization of prisons, private companies handling the management of federal and state inmates. This Article addresses how the privatization of prisons helped to grow the PIC and the two ways in which governments’ expenditure of funds to private prison companies amount to an inefficient allocation of resources: (1) it creates an incentive to increase the prison population, which led to a monopoly and manipulation of the market by Correction Corporation of America (“CCA”) and The GEO Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW DOES CULTURE MATTER? Amartya Sen 1. Introduction
    Forthcoming in "Culture and Public Action" Edited by Vijayendra Rao and Michael Walton. HOW DOES CULTURE MATTER?1 Amartya Sen 1. Introduction Sociologists, anthropologists and historians have often commented on the tendency of economists to pay inadequate attention to culture in investigating the operation of societies in general and the process of development in particular. While we can consider many counterexamples to the alleged neglect of culture by economists, beginning at least with Adam Smith (1776, 1790), John Stuart Mill (1859, 1861), or Alfred Marshall (1891), nevertheless as a general criticism, the charge is, to a considerable extent, justified. This neglect (or perhaps more accurately, comparative indifference) is worth remedying, and economists can fruitfully pay more attention to the influence of culture on economic and social matters. Further, development agencies such as the World Bank may also reflect, at least to some extent, this neglect, if only because they are so predominately influenced by the thinking of economists and financial experts.2 The economists’ scepticism of the role of culture may thus be indirectly reflected in the outlooks and approaches of institutions like the World Bank. No matter how serious this neglect is (and here assessments can differ), the cultural dimension of development requires closer scrutiny in development analysis. It is important to investigate the different ways - and they can be very diverse - in which culture should be taken into account in examining the challenges of development, and in assessing the demands of sound economic strategies. The issue is not whether culture matters, to consider the title of an important and highly successful book jointly edited by Lawrence Harrison and Samuel Huntington.3 That it must be, given the pervasive influence of culture in human life.
    [Show full text]
  • Austrian Theorizing: Recalling the Foundations
    AUSTRIAN THEORIZING: RECALLING THE FOUNDATIONS WALTER BLOCK t is a pleasure to reply to Caplan’s (1999) critique of Austrian economics. Unlike other such recent reactions1 this one shows evidence of great familiarity with the IAustrian (praxeological) literature, and a deep interest in its analytical foundations. Thus, Caplan correctly identifies the works of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard as the core of what sets Austrian economics apart from the neoclassical mainstream. And he insightfully relegates the writings of F.A. Hayek and Israel M. Kirzner to an intermediate position between the praxeological and neoclassical approaches.2 We shall defend this core of Austrian economics against Caplan’s criticisms, and show that, just as in the case of these others, his arrows fall wide of their mark. It is nevertheless instructive to highlight his errors. The benefits are a better understanding of the Austrian School, and greater insight into neoclassical short- comings. This article follows the outline of Caplan (1999) and is divided into the same four sections as his: first an introduction, second, consumer theory, third, welfare economics, and fourth, a conclusion. WALTER BLOCK is economics department chairman and professor at the University of Cen- tral Arkansas, Conway. The author would like to thank Guido Hülsmann and Michael Levin for helpful comments to an earlier draft of this paper. He would also like to thank an anony- mous referee who made no fewer than seven suggestions, all of which were incorporated into this paper, much to its improvement. All remaining errors are, of course, my responsibil- ity. 1See in this regard Rosen (1997), Tullock (1998), Timberlake (1987), Demsetz (1997), Yeager (1987) and Krugman (1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Military-Industrial Complex: Eisenhower's Unsolved Problem
    MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: EISENHOWER'S UNSOLVED PROBLEM by )/lrS THOMAS JENKINS BADGER Bo A., George Washington University., 1949 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted fn pa 1 ful 111b nt of the .'_-. -.- ... — -\-C MASTER OF ARTS Department of Political Science KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1965 Approved by: ~ Major Professor XOOl 1105 6<3 ACKHQWLEOGEMENT TO: Dr. Louis Douglas for suggesting the subject, offering continuous encouragement and valuable advice, and insisting upon a measure of scholar- ship. Or. Robin Higham for reading the manuscript, professional advice and suggestions. Dr. Joseph Hajda, who as the Major Professor, was responsible for the thesis and who tirelessly read and reread drafts, and who patiently pointed out weaknesses needing amplification, correction, or deletion. It Is not Intended to Indicate that these gentlemen concur with the entire thesis. They don't. The errors and misconceptions In the thesis are mine as well as the conclusions but without their assistance the thesis would be unacceptable as a scholarly work. If I could have followed their advice more Intelligently the thesis would be considerably Improved, but whatever merit this work may have the credit belongs to them. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION of the United One hundred and sixty-eight years ago, the first President had served so States presented his farewell address to the country which he from a divided well and which he, as much as any other person, had changed Washington's group of self-oriented states Into a cohesive nation. George permanent alliances principal advice to this young nation was to stay clear of west to settle} with foreign nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Iterated Importance Sampling in Missing Data Problems
    Iterated importance sampling in missing data problems Gilles Celeux INRIA, FUTURS, Orsay, France Jean-Michel Marin ∗ INRIA, FUTURS, Orsay, France and CEREMADE, University Paris Dauphine, Paris, France Christian P. Robert CEREMADE, University Paris Dauphine and CREST, INSEE, Paris, France Abstract Missing variable models are typical benchmarks for new computational techniques in that the ill-posed nature of missing variable models offer a challenging testing ground for these techniques. This was the case for the EM algorithm and the Gibbs sampler, and this is also true for importance sampling schemes. A population Monte Carlo scheme taking advantage of the latent structure of the problem is proposed. The potential of this approach and its specifics in missing data problems are illustrated in settings of increasing difficulty, in comparison with existing approaches. The improvement brought by a general Rao–Blackwellisation technique is also discussed. Key words: Adaptive algorithms, Bayesian inference, latent variable models, population Monte Carlo, Rao–Blackwellisation, stochastic volatility model ∗ Corresponding author: CEREMADE, Place du Mar´echal De Lattre de Tassigny, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France, [email protected] Preprint submitted to Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 25 July 2005 1 Introduction 1.1 Missing data models Missing data models, that is, structures such that the distribution of the data y can be represented via a marginal density Z f(y|θ) = g(y, z|θ)dz , Z where z ∈ Z denotes the so-called ”missing data”, have often been at the forefront of computational Statistics, both as a challenge to existing techniques and as a benchmark for incoming techniques. This is for instance the case with the EM algorithm (Dempster et al., 1977), which was purposely designed for missing data problems although it has since then been applied in a much wider setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthcare in the Usa: Understanding the Medical-Industrial Complex
    B3 | HEALTHCARE IN THE USA: UNDERSTANDING THE MEDICAL-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX Introduction In the mid-1960s a group of progressively-minded New York activists came together to found the Health Policy Advisory Center or Health/PAC as it came to be called It was a time of intense activism in New York as poor communi- ties took to the streets demanding improved services and were emboldened to actually take over Lincoln Hospital in the Bronx (known locally as ‘the butcher shop’) 1 Following a 1967 ‘exposé-analysis’ written by one of the authors of this chapter (Robb Burlage), Health/PAC began publishing a monthly bulletin offering a ‘New Left’ perspective on health Three years later in 1970, John and Barbara Ehrenreich published a book-length critique of US healthcare based on the Health/PAC article, titled The American Health Empire. The medical–industrial complex In November 1969, Health/PAC first used the phrase ‘medical–industrial complex’ (MIC) as a way of characterizing the US health system The term was a spin-off from President Eisenhower’s farewell address in 1961, during which he discussed the dangers of the “military–industrial complex” Health/PAC’s use of the term ‘MIC’ incorporated the perception that healthcare was moving away from a system built on individual doctors and small community hospitals; healthcare was becoming more and more the ‘business’ of large academic centres that Health/PAC characterized as medical empires These medical empires were constructed around a central (private, academic) hospital and outlying satellite
    [Show full text]
  • Involuntary Unemployment Versus "Involuntary Employment" Yasuhiro Sakai 049 Modern Perspective
    Articles Introduction I One day when I myself felt tired of writing some essays, I happened to find a rather old book in the corner of the bookcase of my study. The book, entitledKeynes' General Theory: Re- Involuntary ports of Three Decades, was published in 1964. Unemployment versus More than four decades have passed since then. “Involuntary As the saying goes, time and tide wait for no man! 1) Employment” In the light of the history of economic thought, back in the 1930s, John Maynard J.M. Keynes and Beyond Keynes (1936) wrote a monumental work of economics, entitled The General Theory of -Em ployment, Interest and Money. How and to what degree this book influenced the academic circle at the time of publication, by and large, Yasuhiro Sakai seemed to be dependent on the age of econo- Shiga University / Professor Emeritus mists. According to Samuelson (1946), contained in Lekachman (1964), there existed two dividing lines of ages; the age of thirty-five and the one of fifty: "The General Theory caught most economists under the age of thirty-five with the unex- pected virulence of a disease first attacking and decimating an isolated tribe of south sea islanders. Economists beyond fifty turned out to be quite immune to the ailment. With time, most economists in-between be- gan to run the fever, often without knowing or admitting their condition." (Samuelson, p. 315) In 1936, Keynes himself was 53 years old be- cause he was born in 1883. Remarkably, both Joseph Schumpeter and Yasuma Takata were born in the same year as Keynes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of the Prison in the New Government of Poverty Loïc
    The Place of the Prison in the New Government of Poverty Loïc Wacquant * More than the specifics of statistical figures and trends, it is the deep-seated logic of this swing from the social to the penal that one must grasp here. Far from contradicting the neoliberal project of deregulation and decay of the public sector, the irresistible rise of the U.S. penal state constitutes, as it were, its negative — in the sense of obverse but also of revelator — since it manifests the implementation of a policy of criminalization of poverty that is the indispensable complement to the imposition of precarious and underpaid wage labor as civic obligation for those locked at the bottom of the class and caste structure, as well as the redeployment of social- welfare programs in a restrictive and punitive sense that is concomitant with it. At the time of its institutionalization in the United States of the mid-nineteenth century, “imprisonment was above all a method aiming at the control of deviant and dependent populations,” and inmates were mainly poor people and European immigrants recently arrived in the New World.1 Nowadays, the carceral apparatus of the United States fills an analogous role with respect to those groups rendered superfluous or incongruous by the twofold restructuring of the wage labor relation and state charity: the declining fractions of the working class and poor blacks at the core of formerly industrial cities. In so doing, it has regained a central place in the system of the instruments for the government of poverty, at the crossroads of the deskilled labor market, the collapsing urban ghetto, and social-welfare services “reformed” with a view to buttressing the discipline of desocialized wage work.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan at a Deadlock Also by Michio Morishima
    Japan at a Deadlock Also by Michio Morishima WHY HAS JAPAN ‘SUCCEEDED’? Japan at a Deadlock Michio Morishima STICERD London School of Economics and Political Science Partly translated by Janet Hunter First published in Great Britain 2000 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-1-349-41154-2 ISBN 978-0-230-51216-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230512160 First published in the United States of America 2000 by ST. MARTIN’S PRESS, LLC, Scholarly and Reference Division, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Morishima, Michio, 1923– Japan at a deadlock / Michio Morishima. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Japan—Economic conditions. 2. Japan—History—1868– 3. Capitalism– –Japan. I. Title. HC462.95 .M6764 2000 330.952—dc21 00–033292 © Michio Morishima 2000 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2000 978-0-333-74894-7 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 0LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages.
    [Show full text]
  • ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓ ΡΑΦΙΑ Bibliography
    Τεύχος 53, Οκτώβριος-Δεκέμβριος 2019 | Issue 53, October-December 2019 ΒΙΒΛΙΟΓ ΡΑΦΙΑ Bibliography Βραβείο Νόμπελ στην Οικονομική Επιστήμη Nobel Prize in Economics Τα τεύχη δημοσιεύονται στον ιστοχώρο της All issues are published online at the Bank’s website Τράπεζας: address: https://www.bankofgreece.gr/trapeza/kepoe https://www.bankofgreece.gr/en/the- t/h-vivliothhkh-ths-tte/e-ekdoseis-kai- bank/culture/library/e-publications-and- anakoinwseis announcements Τράπεζα της Ελλάδος. Κέντρο Πολιτισμού, Bank of Greece. Centre for Culture, Research and Έρευνας και Τεκμηρίωσης, Τμήμα Documentation, Library Section Βιβλιοθήκης Ελ. Βενιζέλου 21, 102 50 Αθήνα, 21 El. Venizelos Ave., 102 50 Athens, [email protected] Τηλ. 210-3202446, [email protected], Tel. +30-210-3202446, 3202396, 3203129 3202396, 3203129 Βιβλιογραφία, τεύχος 53, Οκτ.-Δεκ. 2019, Bibliography, issue 53, Oct.-Dec. 2019, Nobel Prize Βραβείο Νόμπελ στην Οικονομική Επιστήμη in Economics Συντελεστές: Α. Ναδάλη, Ε. Σεμερτζάκη, Γ. Contributors: A. Nadali, E. Semertzaki, G. Tsouri Τσούρη Βιβλιογραφία, αρ.53 (Οκτ.-Δεκ. 2019), Βραβείο Nobel στην Οικονομική Επιστήμη 1 Bibliography, no. 53, (Oct.-Dec. 2019), Nobel Prize in Economics Πίνακας περιεχομένων Εισαγωγή / Introduction 6 2019: Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer 7 Μονογραφίες / Monographs ................................................................................................... 7 Δοκίμια Εργασίας / Working papers ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]