DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Report on the Needs Assessment on Identification of Infrastructure for Production Clusters Across Rice, Wheat and Tomato Value Chains

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Report on the Needs Assessment on Identification of Infrastructure for Production Clusters Across Rice, Wheat and Tomato Value Chains DRAFT REPORT ON THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT ON IDENTIFICATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PRODUCTION CLUSTERS ACROSS RICE, WHEAT AND TOMATO VALUE CHAINS. TO AGRO-PROCESSING, PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT AND LIVELIHOOD IMPROVEMENT SUPPORT PROJECT – KANO BY ALI ABDULLAHI, PhD. SABI’U MOHAMMED SULEIMAN, PhD. UBALE SANI. JULY, 2019. 1 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Overview of APPEALS Project ................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Justification of the Exercise ....................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Overall Objectives/Methodology ............................................................................................. 10 1.4 Scope of the Work ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.0 OVERVIEW OF THE PRIORITY CROPS (RICE, TOMATO AND WHEAT) AND GENDER MAINSTREAMING INTO THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT ................................................. 11 2.1 Rice ............................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Tomato ....................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Wheat ......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Gender Mainstreaming into the Needs Assessment ............................................................... 13 3.0 METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ................................................................................. 15 3.1 Overview of Kano State Agricultural Productivity ............................................................... 15 3.2 Sampling Procedure, Data Collection and Analysis .............................................................. 16 3.2.1 Rationale for the selection of the communities ...................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Rapid Appraisal for Agricultural Knowledge Systems (RAAKS) ....................................... 17 4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS ................................................................................................. 19 4.1 General information of the production clusters of the priority value chains ............................ 19 4.1.1 Main income generating activities in the selected LGAs ...................................................... 19 4.1.2 Sources of farm inputs in the selected LGAs ......................................................................... 20 4.2.3 Access and availability of farm services and operations ...................................................... 21 4.1.4 Sources of agricultural finance in the selected LGAs ........................................................... 22 4.1.5 Access and availability of production infrastructure ........................................................... 23 4.1.6 Infrastructural strength across the production clusters of the priority value chains ........ 24 4.1.7 Availability of functional farmers association in the production clusters .......................... 25 4.1.8 Availability of influential farmers association in the production clusters .......................... 26 4.2 Priority value chains (Rice, Tomato and Wheat) situational assessment .................................. 26 4.2.1 Production Clusters of Rice ........................................................................................................ 26 2 4.2.2 Farm size devoted for Rice Production in Kano Clusters ........................................................ 27 4.2.3 Average yield of rice in Kano production clusters ................................................................ 28 4.2.4 Rice Production Challenges .................................................................................................... 29 4.2.5 Production Clusters of Tomato ............................................................................................... 30 4.2.6 Farm size devoted for Tomato Production in Kano Clusters .............................................. 30 4.2.7 Average yield of tomato in Kano production clusters .......................................................... 31 4.2.8 Tomato Production Challenges ............................................................................................... 32 4.2.9 Wheat Production Clusters in Kano ...................................................................................... 33 4.2.10: Average farm size devoted for wheat production .............................................................. 34 3.3 Average yield of wheat in bags per Ha ...................................................................................... 35 4.2.12 Wheat Production Challenges in Selected LGAs ................................................................ 36 4.2.13 Key Actors in Rice, Tomato and Wheat in Kano Production Clusters ............................. 37 4.2 Livelihood Description of the Communities ........................................................................... 38 4.3.1 Livelihood distribution of the production clusters based on physical capital .................... 38 4.3.2 Livelihood distribution of the production clusters based on natural capital ...................... 39 4.3.4 Livelihood distribution of the production clusters based on human capital .......................... 40 4.3.4 Livelihood distribution of the production clusters based on human capital ...................... 41 4.3.5 Livelihood distribution of the production clusters based on human capital ...................... 42 4.4 Production challenges in the production clusters of the priority value chains .......................... 43 4.5 Infrastructural challenges across the production clusters of the priority value chains. .......... 44 APPENDIX I ; Checklist for the Focus Group Discussion ................................................................... 47 APPENDIX II: PHOTOGRAPHS OF FGDS PARTICIPANTS. ........................................................ 51 3 List of Tables Table 1:Distribution of the sample respondents in the study area ................................................... 16 Table 2:RAAKS tools - Actor Identification Sheet. ......................................................................... 18 Table 3:Rice Production Clusters in Kano State ............................................................................. 27 Table 4:Tomato Production Clusters in Kano State ........................................................................ 30 Table 5:Local Government Areas/Communities for Wheat Production .......................................... 34 Table 6:Identification of key actors across the production clusters ................................................. 38 Table 7:Livelihood distribution of the production clusters based on access and availability of physical capital ............................................................................................................................... 39 Table 8:Livelihood distribution of production clusters based on access and availability of human capital ............................................................................................................................................. 41 Table 9:Livelihood distribution of the production clusters based on access and availability of social capital ............................................................................................................................................. 42 Table 10:Livelihood distribution of the production clusters based on access and availability of financial capital .............................................................................................................................. 43 Table 11:Distribution of production challenges in the production clusters of the priority value chains .............................................................................................................................................. 44 Table 12: Production infrastructural challenges across the production clusters of the priority value chains .............................................................................................................................................. 45 4 List of Figures Figure 1:Income generating activities in the selected LGAs ................................................................. 20 Figure 2:Sources of farm inputs in the selected LGAs .......................................................................... 21 Figure 3:Access and availability of farm services and operations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appraisal of Cowpea Cropping Systems and Farmers' Perceptions Of
    Mohammed et al. CABI Agric Biosci (2021) 2:25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-021-00046-7 CABI Agriculture and Bioscience RESEARCH Open Access Appraisal of cowpea cropping systems and farmers’ perceptions of production constraints and preferences in the dry savannah areas of Nigeria Saba Baba Mohammed1,2, Daniel Kwadjo Dzidzienyo2* , Muhammad Lawan Umar1, Mohammad Faguji Ishiyaku1, Pangirayi Bernard Tongoona2 and Vernon Gracen2,3 Abstract Background: Low plant density and wide intra-plant spacing in traditional cowpea cropping systems are among the factors responsible for low yield on farmers’ felds. Sole cropping and improved intercropping systems have been advocated in the last few years to increase yield in the dry savannah areas of Nigeria. This study investigated the level of adoption of high yielding cowpea cropping systems including factors that infuenced their use and farmers’ perceived production constraints and preferences. A total of 420 farmers across 36 villages of northern Nigeria were interviewed, and data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics to appraise farmers predominant cowpea cropping systems and factors that determine the use of sole versus intercropping were identifed with the aid of binary logit regression. Furthermore, pairwise comparison ranking was deployed to understand farmers’ view of cow- pea production constraints and preferred traits. Results: The results revealed that, many of the farmers (42%) still grow cowpeas in the traditional intercropping and a good number (25%) cultivate the crop as a sole crop, while 23% had felds of cowpeas in both sole and intercropping systems. Farmers reported the incidence of high insect pests, limited access to land, desire to have multiple benefts, and assurance in the event of crop failure as reasons for preference for intercropping over sole planting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cholera Risk Assessment in Kano State, Nigeria: a Historical Review, Mapping of Hotspots and Evaluation of Contextual Factors
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES RESEARCH ARTICLE The cholera risk assessment in Kano State, Nigeria: A historical review, mapping of hotspots and evaluation of contextual factors 1 2 2 2 Moise Chi NgwaID *, Chikwe Ihekweazu , Tochi OkworID , Sebastian Yennan , 2 3 4 5 Nanpring Williams , Kelly ElimianID , Nura Yahaya Karaye , Imam Wada BelloID , David A. Sack1 1 Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, 2 Nigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria, 3 Department of a1111111111 Microbiology, University of Benin, Nigeria, 4 Department of Public Health and Disease Control, Kano State a1111111111 Ministry of Health, Kano, Nigeria, 5 Department of Public Health and Disease Control, Ministry of Health a1111111111 Kano, Kano, Nigeria a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Nigeria is endemic for cholera since 1970, and Kano State report outbreaks annually with Citation: Ngwa MC, Ihekweazu C, Okwor T, Yennan high case fatality ratios ranging from 4.98%/2010 to 5.10%/2018 over the last decade. How- S, Williams N, Elimian K, et al. (2021) The cholera ever, interventions focused on cholera prevention and control have been hampered by a risk assessment in Kano State, Nigeria: A historical lack of understanding of hotspot Local Government Areas (LGAs) that trigger and sustain review, mapping of hotspots and evaluation of contextual factors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 15(1): yearly outbreaks. The goal of this study was to identify and categorize cholera hotspots in e0009046. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. Kano State to inform a national plan for disease control and elimination in the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Domestic Water Supply in Kano State, Nigeria.International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 44, 489-494
    International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE) To Cite This Article: Bello, N. I., Imam, M. Z., Adamu, H. & Abubakar, A. S. (2021).Overview of domestic water supply in Kano state, Nigeria.International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 44, 489-494. Submitted: April 12, 2021 Revised: May 16, 2021 Accepted: May 23, 2021 OVERVIEW OF DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY IN KANO STATE, NIGERIA Nura Isyaku BELLO1 Mahmoud Zubair IMAM2 Hassan ADAMU3 Ahmad Said ABUBAKAR4 Abstract Accessibility to safe and clean domestic water by households is paramount for personal and developmental health at all levels in Nigeria. Kano State Water Board (KSWB) was saddle with responsibility of domestic water supply to the entire state. The state have about 22 water treatment plants that source, treat and distribute water to the residents of the study area. The data collected were from secondary sources, descriptive statistics was the statistical instruments used in the data analysis. KSWB supply about 415 million litres daily (MLD) to the Kano city and its environs and about 92 MLD to local government headquarters and semi-urban areas. Similarly, there about 50 commercial water standing pumps being operated and maintained by KSWB to ease water supply to nook and crannies of the state.Where pipe borne water is not connected, boreholes, hands pumped and concrete wells are constructed by Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency (RUWASA) to ease water supply at sufficient quality and quantity to rural communities in the state. Keywords: Domestic
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrition Success
    Introducing the Immunity Boosting Sweet Potato to Kano State Nigeria is one of the countries with the highest risk of Vitamin A Deficiency (VAD). It is also particularly challenging to reach the most vulnerable children in rural, hard to reach communities as these communities are often missed during Vitamin A supplementation programs. As such, only two in five children receive adequate levels of supplementation, leaving a higher percentage of children at risk of Vitamin A Deficiency (VAD). National surveys show that Kano state has one of the lowest vitamin A uptake levels. eHealth Africa received funding from the German Cooperation (GIZ) to implement a pilot project with the goal of supplementing vitamin A uptake and Pictures from the hands-on training and cooking demon- diversifying the diets of GIZ farmers in Kano state stration. through the introduction of Orange- Fleshed Sweet Potato (OFSP). OFSP is a biofortified crop that is rich in Using an integrated agriculture and nutrition beta-carotene, the precursor of Vitamin A. The recom- approach, eHA built the capacity of Rabi and other mended daily allowance (RDA) of Vitamin A in children women farmers to utilize OFSP for the production of and non-lactating mothers can be met by consuming a weaning baby foods and household meals using local- root of OFSP as small as 125 grams1. ly available ingredients. She was also trained to In collaboration with the Kano State Agricultural and produce commercial products from OFSP which she Rural Management Authority (KNARDA), Women could sell to generate additional income. Farmers Advanced Network (WOFAN) and with support I learnt how to make bread, snacks, chin-chin, cakes, from International Potato Centre (CIP), eHA trained juice and kunu from OFSP and now, can make more over 900 CARI farmers to produce, prepare and process “money to support my family.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • {L' 7 3-,\O Tfmeat Novem Ber 2002 [,:.R'nroini.;Tion
    AFRICAN PROGRAMME, FOR ONCHOCE,RCIASIS CONTROL (APOC) Forth Year Technical RePort for Community Directed Treatment with Ivermectin (cDrI) Dambatta Bichi Lbasawa Begwei Shanono Ajingi Gwarzo Kabo Gaya Wudil Kiru Bebcii Rano Karaye Takai Sumaila Doguwa Lp L For Acu-,,, I r.. ..4+ Caoa5 C5D Kano State clE' . l.r Nigeria p il, /{l' 7 3-,\o tfmeat Novem ber 2002 [,:.r'nroini.;tion Tr-r,_ I pr_ A'"' EXECUTTVE SUMMARY Kano State is situated in the northern part of Nigeria. The State has 44local govemment areas out of which 18 are Meso endemic with few hyper-endemic foci. The State falls in the Sudan Savannah and Sahel zones. Howeyer, the endemic areas are generally located in the Sudan savannah. The Ivermectin Distribution Programme (IDP) is in the 7th treatment round in some of the LGAs while in the 6th treatment round in others. However, CDTI strategy started in 1999. The CDTI project is therefore implemented in 779 communities of the 18 APOC approved local governments. Mobilization of the community members was conducted in all the targeted communities. In addition to mobilization, the state officials conducted advocacy visits to all the endemic local government Areas. The Launching of the commencement of 2002 prograrnme, which was performed by His Excellency, the Deputy Governor of Kano State increased awareness and acceptance of Mectizan by the people in the State. Electronic media, town criers and CDDs were among the mobilization strategies adopted for community mobilization. Targeted Training and re-training of CDTI programme personnel was conducted at state, LGA, and community levels, for those that are new in the programme as well as those with training dfficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Societal Responses to the State of Orphans and Vulnerable Children (OVC) in Kano
    Societal Responses to the State of Orphans and Vulnerable Children (OVC) in Kano Metropolis- Nigeria A thesis presented to the faculty of the Center for International Studies of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Mustapha Hashim Kurfi June 2010 © 2010 Mustapha Hashim Kurfi. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Societal Responses to the State of Orphans and vulnerable children (OVC) in Kano Metropolis- Nigeria by MUSTAPHA HASHIM KURFI has been approved for the Center for International Studies by Steve Howard Professor of African Studies Steve Howard Director, African Studies Daniel Weiner Executive Director, Center for International Studies 3 ABSTRACT KURFI, MUSTAPHA HASHIM, M.A., June 2010, African Studies Societal Responses to the State of Orphans and Vulnerable Children (OVC) in Kano Metropolis- Nigeria (131 pp.) Director of Thesis: Steve Howard This study uses qualitative methodology to examine the contributions of Non- Governmental Organizations in response to the conditions of Orphans and Vulnerable Children (OVC) in Kano metropolis. The study investigates what these organizations do, what methods, techniques, and strategies they employ to identify the causes of OVC’s conditions for intervention. The study acknowledges colonization, globalization, poverty, illiteracy, and individualism as contributing factors to OVC’s conditions. However, essentially, the study identifies gross misunderstanding between paternal and maternal relatives of children to be the main factor responsible for the OVC’s conditions. This social disorganization puts the children in difficult conditions including exposure to health, educational, moral, emotional, psychological, and social problems. The thesis concludes that through “collective efficacy” the studied organizations are a perfect means for solving-problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph Series # 19 Mapping of Production And
    PrOpCom Making Nigerian Agricultural Markets Work for the Poor Monograph Series # 19 Mapping of Production and Processing Clusters in Kano, Jigawa, Katsina and Kaduna States Prepared by Community Empowerment Initiative (COMEIN) May 2007 Funding for this programme is provided by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) 40 Mississippi Street, Maitama, Abuja, Nigeria • Tel: +(234) 9 413 8291/2 • Fax: +(234) 9 413 829 Disclaimer The PrOpCom Monograph Series seeks to provide a broader dissemination of the information and views collected through the efforts of the various service providers and consultants undertaking work in support of the PrOpCom programme. We believe this information will be useful in informing the policy dialogue in Nigeria and for improving the planning and execution of agricultural and agribusiness activities within the country. The documents in this series represent the final deliverables as presented by the engaged service providers or consultants in responds to terms of reference of contracts let by PrOpCom in execution of its programme. They have not been further edited or editorially polished. Consequently, there is wide variation in the editorial quality of these documents. Nevertheless, the information contained in these document is deems useful for policy and planning purposes. The views and opinions expressed in these documents are solely those of the authors of the document and do not necessarily represent the views of PrOpCom, SAII Associates, Chemonics International or PrOpCom’s funding agent, the Government of the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) Information from these documents can be freely used and quoted on condition that it is properly sourced to the concerned document.
    [Show full text]
  • Ningi Raids and Slavery in Nineteenth Century Sokoto Caliphate
    SLAVERY AND ABOLITION A Journal of Comparative Studies Edilorial Advisory Boord · RogerT. Anstey (Kent) Ralph A. Austen (Chicago) Claude Meillassoux (Paris) David Brion Davis (Yale) Domiltique de Menil (Menil ~O'LIlmllllllll Carl N. Degler (Stanford) Suzanne Miers (Ohio) M.1. Finley (Cambridge) Joseph C. Miller (Virginia) Jan Hogendorn (Colby) Orlando Patterson (Harvard) A. G. Hopkins (Birmingham) Edwin Wolf 2nd (Library Co. of Winthrop D. Jordan (Berkeley) Philadelphia) Ion Kenneth Maxwell (Columbia) Edit"': Associate Ediwr: John Ralph Willis (Princeton) C. Duncan Rice (Hamilton) Volume 2 Number 2 September 1981 .( deceased) Manusc ripts and all editorial correspondence and books for review should be Tuareg Slavery and the Slave Trade Priscill a Elle n Starrett 83 (0 Professor John Ralph Willis, Near Eastern Studies Department, Prince. University , Princeton, New Jersey 08540. ~in gi Raids and Slave ry in Nineteenth Articles submiued [0 Slavery and Abolilion are considered 0t:\ the understanding Centu ry Sokoto Ca liphate Adell Patton, Jr. 114 they are not being offered for publication elsewhere , without the exp ressed cO losenll the Editor. Slavery: Annual Bibliographical Advertisement and SUbscription enquiries should be sent to Slavery and IIbol"'", Supplement (198 1) Joseph C. Miller 146 Frank Cass & Co. Ltd., Gainsborough House, II Gainsborough London Ell IRS. The Medallion on the COVel" is reproduced by kind perm.ission of Josiah W"dgwoocU Sons Ltd. © Frank Cass & Co. Ltd. 1981 All rigllt! ,eseroed. No parr of his publication may be reprodU4ed. siored in 0 retrieval sysu.. lJ'anmliJt~d in anyfarm. or by any ,"eal'lJ. eUclJ'onic. rMchonicoJ. phalocopying. recording. or without tlu pn·or permissicm of Frank Call & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • 29 Land Resources of Central Nigeria Agricultural Deveippment Possibilities Volume 6B Kano Plains ° °
    29 Land resources of central Nigeria Agricultural deveippment possibilities Volume 6B Kano Plains ° ° . o , " , Qd^fögssm^Gass^^ ° * * " • • o - ' d ° n ° Scanned from original by ISRIC - World Soil Information, as ICSU World Data Centre for Soils. The purpose is to make a safe depository for endangered documents and to make the accrued information available for consultation, following Fair Use Guidelines. Every effort is taken to respect Copyright of the materials within the archives where the identification of the Copyright holder is clear and, where feasible, to contact the originators. For questions please contact «="•» jgriri^iwur.nl indicating the item reference number concerned. Land resources of central Nigeria Agricultural development possibilities Volume 6B The Kano Plains ISSN 0305-6554 ISBN 0 902409 91 3 1H5S Land Resources Development Centre Land resources of central Nigeria Agricultural development possibilities Volume 6B The Kano Plains Land Resources Development Centre Central Nigeria Project Team (ed. J R D Wall) J Abah, J G Bennett, A Blair Rains, P N Gosden, W J Howard, A A Hutcheon, J Ibanga, S Kalejaiye, W B Kerr, J E Mansfield, L J Rackham, R Rose-lnnes, J Valette Land Resource Study 29 Land Resources Development Centre, Ministry of Overseas Development, Tolworth Tower, Surbiton, Surrey, England KT6 7DY 1979 LAND RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CENTRE* The Land Resources Development Centre of the Ministry of Overseas Development assists developing countries in mapping, investigating and assessing land resources, and makes recommendations on the use of these resources for the development of agriculture, livestock husbandry and forestry; it also gives advice on related subjects to overseas governments and organisations, makes scientific personnel available for appointment abroad and provides lectures and training courses in the basic techniques of resource appraisal and development.
    [Show full text]
  • DTM Nigeria | Site Assessment Dashboard - North Central and North West Round 4 Nigeria August, 2020
    DTM DTM Nigeria | Site Assessment Dashboard - North Central and North West Round 4 Nigeria August, 2020 Gada Tangaza Illela Sabon Birni Sites Population Sokoto Gwadabawa ! ± 56% Gudu 44% Goronyo NIGER Kware Wurno are female. Binji Isa ! are male. Sokoto North Kaita ! Mai'adua Yobe Wamako ! Rabah !! Mashi Sokoto South Shinkafi Jibia Katsina Silame ! ! Daura Yobe Maradun Zango Zurmi ! Batagarawa Mani Dutsi Safana Bodinga Dange-Shuni ! Yabo Rimi Baure Batsari Kurfi Bindawa Charanchi Shagari !! Bakura ! Ingawa Kebbi Kankia 64 107,233 Kaura Namoda Katsina Birnin Magaji Kusada Kunchi 80% 15% Sandamu Dutsin-Ma Dambatta Tambuwal Talata Mafara Jigawa Tureta Makoda Bungudu Matazu Tsanyawa Bichi are women are children under Gusau Dan Musa Minjibir Gabasawa ! ! Dawakin Tofa Sites assessed Individuals in sites Musawa Bagwai Ungogo Gezawa Shanono Tofa and children. 5 years. Gummi Zamfara Fagge Kankara ! Tarauni Ajingi Bukkuyum Anka Rimin Gado !! Warawa Kebbe Malumfashi Gwarzo Tsafe ! Kabo Kumbotso Gaya ! Madobi Dawakin Kudu ! Karaye Kura Wudil Faskari Kafur Garum Mallam Bunkure Bakori Albasu Kiru Garko Maru Funtua Kibiya Gusau Rogo Bebeji Takai 6% of women 17% have been Dandume Rano ! Danja Kano Markafi are nursing previously displaced. Sites Number Population by Sabuwa Kudan Tudun Wada Sumaila Ikara Sabon-Gari Giwa mothers. by Status Site status Zaria Kaduna Soba Birnin-Gwari Igabi Kubau Doguwa Gombe 28% cited 6% of the sites have Kaduna North Kaduna South Kajuru Bauchi traupalin as the households living Lere Kauru 19% Chikun ! most needed outside shelters. Bassa Jos North shelter material. ! 48% Niger Jos East 52% Kachia Zango-Kataf Jos South Kaura ! ! Riyom Kanam 81% Jaba 42% 33% cited Kagarko Barikin Ladi Kwara Jema'a Mangu Kanke complained of blanket/mat as the most Bokkos Pankshin Karu Sanga Langtang North not having needed NFI.
    [Show full text]
  • MNCH2 Monthly Flash Report January 2019 KANO Kano Is Located in North-Western Nigeria
    MNCH2 Monthly Flash Report January 2019 KANO Kano is located in north-western Nigeria. With an estimated population of 13.4 million, it is the most populous of Nigeria’s 36 states. The child mortality rate is 103/1000 live births (MICS 2016/17), with less than 50% of children under 5 fully vaccinated and 20% availability of child health cards (MICS 2017). Key achievements Lessons Transition and Sustainability • Mapping of 260 out of 264 MNCH2 supported facilities was • Partnership between the State Ministry of Health and Kano State conducted. This was aimed at plotting service delivery points and • The Sustainable drug supply system committee has finalised plans to other community based interventions with communities served Emirate Council on Health and Development (KECCOHD) has led to across MNCH2 intervention locations. resolution of block rejection of Immunisation in Gamadan community scale up establishment of Facility Health Committees (FHCs) in all Kura LGA. health facilities running Drug Revolving Funds (DRF) scheme. • MNCH2 supported the Economic & Financial Modelling study of Kano State Contributory Healthcare Scheme. Findings from the • The State government through the Child Memorandum of study led to a review of the State’s healthcare financing landscape • Inter-agency collaboration and cooperation in the state led to the review and policies options to address identified gaps. of the operational guidelines of KHETFUND that allowed increased understanding has committed to funding the monthly control room funding allocation from about 5% to about 30% for the new vulnerable meetings across the 6 Primary Healthcare Management Board zonal • Kano State Contributory Health Management Agency (KSCHA) group component of the Kano State Healthcare Contributory Scheme levels.
    [Show full text]