Prima Scriptura an Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prima Scriptura an Introduction PRIMA SCRIPTURA An Introduction New Testamentto Interpretation N. CLAYTON CROY K N. Clayton Croy, Prima Scriptura: An Introduction to New Testament Interpretation, Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2011. Used by permisison. _Croy_PrimaScriptura_RAH_djm.indd 3 3/29/11 1:40 PM © 2011 by N. Clayton Croy Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Except as otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A.; used by permission; all rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Croy, N. Clayton. Prima Scriptura : an introduction to New Testament interpretation / N. Clayton Croy. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and indexes. ISBN 978-0-8010-3588-3 (pbk.) 1. Bible. N. T.—Hermeneutics. I. Title. BS2331.C76 2011 225.6 1—dc22 2010051136 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 N. Clayton Croy, Prima Scriptura: An Introduction to New Testament Interpretation, Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2011. Used by permisison. _Croy_PrimaScriptura_RAH_djm.indd 4 3/29/11 1:40 PM Contents Preface: A Complex and Contested Enterprise ix Acknowledgments xv Introduction: Definitions, Theoretical Issues, and Preview of the Method xvii 1. Analyzing and Preparing the Interpreter 1 2. Analyzing the Text 13 3. Evaluating and Contemporizing the Text 129 4. Appropriating the Text and Transforming the Community 161 Appendix 1: Sample Exegesis Paper—“Jesus on Probation” (Luke 4:1–13) 169 Appendix 2: Sample Exegetical Brief—Hebrews 1:1–4 181 Appendix 3: Pictograph of Philippians 185 Appendix 4: Pictograph of 2 Corinthians 187 Appendix 5: Chart of the Gospel of Mark 189 Appendix 6: Nestle-Aland27 and UBS4 Comparison Chart 193 Appendix 7: In the Laboratory with Agassiz 195 Bibliography 199 Subject Index 229 Author Index 233 Scripture Index 237 vii N. Clayton Croy, Prima Scriptura: An Introduction to New Testament Interpretation, Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2011. Used by permisison. _Croy_PrimaScriptura_RAH_djm.indd 7 3/29/11 1:40 PM Preface A Complex and Contested Enterprise n January 2005 the Executive Council of the Society of Biblical Literature I(SBL), the largest professional association of teachers and scholars of the Bible, faced a dilemma. The council had received a resolution from a group of members responding to the recent U.S. election in November 2004. The resolu- tion observed that “values,” sometimes specifically called “Christian values” or “biblical values,” had emerged in the campaign as a key political issue. The group contended that the values “most commonly identified in public debates were the issues of gay marriage, abortion, and stem-cell research.” The resolution went on to argue that these values “are not major concerns in the Bible, and in fact are not even directly addressed in the Bible. Rather, they tend to reflect the underlying problems of homophobia, misogyny, con- trol of reproductive rights, and restraint of expression (including scientific research) in U.S. society today.” The proponents of the resolution asserted that “the moral issues dominating the biblical texts focus instead on concerns such as the well-being of individuals, the integrity of community, care for the powerless and the vulnerable, economic justice, the establishment of peace, and the stewardship of the environment.” They concluded that the Society should work toward securing these goals and values. The Executive Council had at least three alternatives: 1. to reject the resolution out of hand; 2. to endorse the resolution as an official statement of the Society; or 3. to refer the resolution to the membership for responses and comments. ix N. Clayton Croy, Prima Scriptura: An Introduction to New Testament Interpretation, Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2011. Used by permisison. _Croy_PrimaScriptura_RAH_djm.indd 9 3/29/11 1:40 PM x Preface The council wisely chose the third course. The resolution was sent electronically to 5,585 members, asking them to vote “agree” or “disagree” and inviting com- ments. The response was quantitatively strong (35 percent of those receiving the resolution) and qualitatively vigorous (thoughtful and spirited comments were given by 46 percent of the respondents). When the dust settled, the vote was 56 percent in agreement with the resolution, 44 percent in disagreement. The vote was unscientific since participation was voluntary, but the response was large enough to indicate a deep divide on the issues raised by the resolution. There are several lessons in this controversy. The Society of Biblical Lit- erature is a diverse group. The Bible is regarded as relevant, by one group or another, to a wide range of public policy issues, including social justice issues traditionally, and stereotypically, identified as “liberal” concerns, as well as “family values” similarly identified as “conservative.” Finally, and perhaps most poignantly, the response to the resolution indicates that biblical interpretation is a complex and contested enterprise. The SBL is a professional organization of scholarly experts, most of whom hold doctorates or are student members in the process of earning them. When trained experts disagree so sharply, what hope of consensus can be entertained by laypersons (in either the ecclesial or academic sense)? The status quo need not be wholly discouraging, however. As Brevard S. Childs observes about the general state of contemporary biblical scholarship, “The very intensity of the conflicting voices serves to confirm the impression that the problem of biblical interpretation does not arise from apathy. Cannot one draw the implication that in spite of confusion and conflict in respect to biblical interpretation, there is an unexpressed consensus that the Bible still possesses a seriousness of content and an evocative power for raising basic questions which offers hope in a search for its renewed understanding in the twenty-first century?” (Childs, foreword to Bartholomew, 2000: xv). While Childs rightly observes that indifference to the Bible is seldom a problem, never- theless, complex and sometimes contradictory visions emerge from its study. Several factors complicate the interpretation of the Bible (Porter, 1997a: 11–15; Hayes and Holladay, 2007: 12–16). Some of them have to do with the Bible itself, its distance from us, and its foreignness. Other factors have to do with the interpreters, the modern readers of the text, their limitations, biases, skills, and perspectives. Both kinds deserve some elaboration. 1. Our outsider status. All modern readers are outsiders to the original communicative act of Scripture. In this sense, the Bible was not written for us. Our common humanity, the providence of God, and the illumination of the Holy Spirit enable the Bible to continue to speak to persons today, but they neither erase its foreign qualities nor provide a quick and easy bridge to a critical understanding of its message. Most of the writings of the Bible are more aptly described as having a timely message than a timeless one. Their assumptions, modes of thought, teachings, exhortations, laments, and N. Clayton Croy, Prima Scriptura: An Introduction to New Testament Interpretation, Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2011. Used by permisison. _Croy_PrimaScriptura_RAH_djm.indd 10 3/29/11 1:40 PM Preface xi exultations are rooted in another era and are addressed to circumstances that prevailed in the two millennia prior to the birth of Jesus and in the first cen- tury CE, not the twenty-first century CE. Among the New Testament writings our outsider status is especially evident with respect to epistolary literature. The old quip has an element of truth: when we read Paul’s Letters, we are reading someone else’s mail (Hayes and Holladay, 2007: 12). The other side of this coin, however, is that Christian readers of Scripture often feel directly addressed by its words, sometimes to their comfort, sometimes to their dismay (Green, 2007b: 50–59). 2. Language. Modern English translations make most passages of Scripture fairly intelligible, and we should be grateful for the generations of scholars who have toiled over manuscripts, lexicons, and manuals of style to make the Scriptures available in the vernacular. But the ease of reading such works belies the fact that they are the product of countless hours of intense study, debate, and decision making. We have learned much over the centuries about Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek lexicography, syntax, idiom, and style, but dif- ficult decisions remain in which even highly trained experts are compelled to make their best guesses. Translations by necessity do not reveal the difficulty of those decisions. Neither is it a transparent fact to all readers that transla- tion involves interpretation. Although the goal of translation is to convey the meaning of the original text into the target language and not to modify it, differences between the original language and the target language often re- quire translators to choose among possible nuances of a word or alternative construals of grammatical phenomena. A person only needs to read a few English translations of the same passage to see how slight, and sometimes significant, differences emerge in the process of translation. 3. History. Almost two thousand years separate us from the writings of the New Testament. One need not read much of the biblical text for that distance to become apparent. Medicine was primitive, infant mortality was common, and physical ailments were sometimes attributed to evil spirits.
Recommended publications
  • Sola Scriptura: Then and Now by Anna Case-Winters P
    REFORMED WORLD VOLUME 66.1 World Communion of Reformed Churches World Communion The Catholic Presbyterian (1879-1883), The Quarterly of Reformed Churches Register (1886-1936), The Presbyterian Register (1937-1948), The Presbyterian World (1949-1955), The Reformed and Presbyterian World (1956-1970), Reformed World (1971-) Volume 66 (1) • ISSN 0034-3056 CONTENTS: Introduction P.1 Sola Scriptura: Then and Now by Anna Case-Winters P. 2 Revelation – Holy Scripture – Hermeneutics by Matthias Zeindler P. 24 Hermeneutics of the Meeting of Worlds and the Principle of Sola Scriptura P. 38 by Yolanda Dreyer Biblical Multiplicity and the Unity of the Church by Michael Weinrich P. 55 An apology and official retraction - The article “Presbyterians, Sexuality and Membership Transition in the United States” by Timothy T. N. Lim was mistakenly included in Reformed World, Volume 65 (2 & 3). While it had been submitted for consideration, it was not formally accepted; nor was Dr. Lim notified that it would be published. We wholeheartedly apologize to Dr. Lim for printing an essay that was not yet ready for publication. We also apologize to anyone who found fault with this essay. We issue a formal retraction of this essay. REFORMED WORLD is published by the World Communion of Reformed Churches, www.wcrc.ch. President: Jerry Pillay General Secretary: Chris Ferguson Officers: Helis Barraza Diaz, Yvette Noble-Bloomfield, Bas Plaisier, Yueh Wen-Lu, Johann WeusmannStaff : Dora Arce- Valentín, Aruna Gnanadason, Werner Joecker, Anna Krüger, Hanns Lessing, Katrina
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Hermeneutics for the Twenty-First Century African
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Liberty University Digital Commons LIBERTY UNIVERSITY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AFRICAN AMERICAN CHURCH: INTRODUCING SEVEN KEY SOLUTIONS PROMOTING HIGHER EDUCATION A Thesis Project Submitted to Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF MINISTRY By Jacqueline Blalock Montague Lynchburg, Virginia May 2014 Copyright © 2014 Jacqueline B. Montague All Rights Reserved THESIS PROJECT APPROVAL SHEET _____________________________ GRADE _____________________________ MENTOR: Dr. Charlie Davidson Director, Doctor of Ministry Program Associate Professor of Chaplaincy ______________________________ READER: Dr. David Hirschman Acting Dean, Assistant Professor of Religion ABSTRACT BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AFRICAN AMERICAN CHURCH: INTRODUCING SEVEN KEY SOLUTIONS PROMOTING HIGHER EDUCATION Jacqueline B. Montague Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, 2014 Mentor: Dr. Charlie Nathan Davidson Despite the fact that education builds knowledge, higher learning through Seminary is preached from many African American pulpits as having little merit. The author’s hope is to channel broader understanding on how the seminary experience can make a difference in accomplishing the assignment commissioned by Jesus to a postmodern society. To achieve this goal, the author divulges the importance and necessity of seminary studies from a semiotic approach. Research includes a study of the hermeneutic circle and its three parts: text, messenger, and listeners; collected data from culture analyses and statistical reports to comprise three pastoral interviews. The objective is to set enslaved convictions free by introducing seven key solutions promoting higher learning, illuminating the vital link between knowledge and hermeneutics for the twenty- first century church.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Bible: a Catholic Approach to Interpreting Sacred Scripture by Monsignor Lawrence Moran & Ronald J
    UnderstandingUnderstandin theg the Bible: Bible: A CatholicA Catholic Approach Approach to toInterpreting Interpreting Sacred Sacred Scripture Scripture By Monsignor Lawrence Moran & Ronald J. Eldred By Monsignor Lawrence Moran & Ronald J. Eldred In this essay we look at the meaning of Divine Revelation, the meaning of inspiration, and what the Bible is, including who wrote it, and when, where, how, and why it was written, and how the books were selected. Also, we examine the senses of scripture and typology as well as guide- lines for reading and interpreting it. Furthermore, we discuss the different exegetical or hermeneutical tools and translation theories. Moreover, we consider the similarities and differences of Catholic and Protestant ver- sions of the Bible and of the meaning of the apocryphal writings. Catholic Apologetics Understanding the bible Understanding the Bible: A Catholic Approach to Interpreting Sacred Scripture By Monsignor Lawrence Moran & Ronald J. Eldred Table of Contents INTRODUCTION DIVINE REVELATION Purposes of the Bible The meaning of Divine Revelation Why it is reasonable to believe that God revealed Himself SACRED SCRIPTURE AND TRADITION Sacred Scripture (the Bible) Sacred Tradition How to properly read and interpret Holy Scripture HERMENEUTICS AND EXEGESIS Hermeneutics Exegesis INSPIRATION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT The Bible is free from all error The Gospel Truth The Synoptic Problem Why the Bible can be so hard to understand The equal status of the Word and the Eucharist HOW THE GOSPELS WERE WRITTEN The life and
    [Show full text]
  • When Was the Protestant New Testament Finalized
    When Was The Protestant New Testament Finalized Wealthy Jereme retitled dooms while Zack always drapes his commodities camouflaging patrilineally, he schmoozing so reprehensively. Accommodable Jeth drive-ins conventionally. Ignaz usually coagulating muddily or hoover interruptedly when unsisterly Derrek swoosh someday and astronomically. Biblical canon New World Encyclopedia. When things they have first written testament was the protestant new. However quakers and finally drawn from god, during the new testament was the protestant reformation, not written and individuals often important criteria. Why lessen the Protestant Bible missing books? Variable but the virgin birth to when was that would violate this? Why do Protestants disagree with Catholicism? Why do Protestants worship on Sunday? Most Christian groups today without regard the canon of the Bible as closed That question God permit His provi- dence has guided us into the listing of runway the documents that. The Origins of the Reformation Bible OUPblog. What do Catholic and Protestant canons of time Old car differ in. Who endanger the Protestant God? Them endure the chronological order these which they well written. The canon of giving New talk is undeniably not displace a biblical doctrine. Overview within The 66 Books Of The Bible Learn Religions. Do Protestants make the sign pass the cross? How the divine Testament Canon Was Chosen Ascension. And i wanted to determine what were unconditionally necessary in the apostles the protestant new testament was finalized canon, for the new testament books? Text assist the modern Hebrew version of the Old action which was finalized in the. Go even the answer for our sins may have god and the very risky in the churches have thought and was finalized by jewish canon was.
    [Show full text]
  • Church a Biblical Understanding of Leadership and Mutual Submission
    A s C h r i s t S u b m i t s t o t h e Church A Biblical Understanding of Leadership and Mutual Submission Alan G. Padgett K Alan G. Padgett, As Christ Submits to the Church: A Biblical Understanding of Leadership and Mutual Submission, Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2011. Used by permission. _Padgett_ChristSubmits_AVD_djm.indd 3 5/2/11 2:42 PM These websites are hyperlinked. www. .com www.bakeracademic.com www.brazospress.com www.chosenbooks.com www.revellbooks.com © 2011 by Alan G. Padgett Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Padgett, Alan G., 1955– As Christ submits to the church : a biblical understanding of leadership and mutual submission / Alan G. Padgett. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and indexes. ISBN 978-0-8010-2700-0 (pbk.) 1. Sex role—Biblical teaching. 2. Submissiveness—Biblical teaching. 3. Servant leadership—Biblical teaching. 4. Bible. N.T.—Theology. I. Title. BS2545.S37P33 2011 220.8 3053—dc22 2011005204 Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are the author’s own translation. Scripture quotations labeled NRSV are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989, by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Eisegesis by Dr
    The Problem of Eisegesis By Dr. Richard J. Krejcir, Francis A. Schaeffer Institute of Church Leadership Development Acts 17:11; 2 Corinthians 4:2; and 2 Timothy 2:15; Revelation 22:18-19 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. Revelation 22:18-19 Do you read from the Bible or read into the Bible? Do you know the difference? How is the Bible delved into by your eyes, mind, and church? Do you seek to read into it what you want? Or, do you seek to glean what God actually has for you and the people He has called you to teach and reach? Are the views you have based on hard evidence and careful biblical study? Or, do you just take for granted what a favorite mentor or teacher or theological position has to say? We have a big crisis in the conservative and evangelical churches in America! The problem was once just isolated to fringe, uneducated pastors and churches who had no regard for a good Bible education and careful learning. There is a mindset of anti-intellectualism, not wanting to be knowledgeable in the language, history, or tools of the Word, thinking it would be better to just be led by the Holy Spirit, when in fact, laziness and pride were the reasons for ignoring the real moving of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Theology, 3Rd Edition Baker Academic, a Division of Baker Publishing Group, © 1983, 1998, 2013 Used by Permission
    C H R I S T I A N THEOLOGY THIRD EDITION MILLARD J. ERICKSON K Millard Erickson, Christian Theology, 3rd Edition Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 1983, 1998, 2013 Used by permission. (Unpublished manuscript—copyright protected Baker Publishing Group) Erickson_ChrTheol3ded_RH_djm.indd iii 5/2/13 2:54 PM © 1983, 1998, 2013 by Millard Erickson Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Erickson, Millard J. Christian theology / Millard J. Erickson. — 3rd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8010-3643-9 (cloth) 1. Theology, Doctrinal. I. Title. BT75.3.E725 2013 230—dc23 2012042213 Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from the Holy Bible, New International Version®. NIV®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.™ Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved worldwide. www.zondervan.com Scripture quotations labeled NIV 1984 are from the Holy Bible, New International Version®. NIV®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by Biblica, Inc.™ Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved worldwide. www.zondervan.com 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Millard Erickson, Christian Theology, 3rd Edition Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 1983, 1998, 2013 Used by permission.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Journal of Homiletics Volume 3 (2018)
    The International Journal of Homiletics Volume 3 (2018) International Journal of Homiletics: Volume 3 (2018) Editorial We, the co-editors of the International Journal of Homiletics along with the entire Editorial Board, are glad to present the third volume of our journal – containing six articles and a “Homiletical Squib” written by scholars from the United States, Korea, and South Africa. In 2017 Protestant churches all over the world remembered and celebrated “500 years of Reformation.” The first two articles in this journal offer a homiletical rereading of Martin Luther and John Calvin, two of the most important Reformers of the 16th century. Both articles show how fruitful it can be to reread homiletical traditions in order to find responses to today’s questions about political preaching and preaching in the context of the life realities of refugees. Timothy Andrew Leitzke analyzes the ambiguity in Luther’s positions towards political questions in his time and is well aware of the history of interpretation and misinterpretation of Luther’s words in the centuries to come. By working through Luther’s theology of Trinity, Leitzke develops a theologically grounded way of preaching politically in a Lutheran tradition. Andrew Thomson Scales shows the hermeneutical, societal and political background of Geneva in 1550 – a city in which almost half of the population (!) were refugees and the social tensions were immense. Calvin discovers the “plain sense” of the words of the prophet Micah in order to address Micah’s words to the people of Geneva and to his diverse congregation directly. Scales argues that for Calvin, “God becomes prochain, the neighbor, and the decision to love the neighbor is a recognition that one cannot love God without treating others with justice and equity.” At the same time, Scales’ article highlights Calvin’s covenantal theology and argues for what this theology may mean in discussions about preaching the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sola Scriptura Principle in the Current Debate1
    Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 24/1 (2013):107-126. Article copyright © 2013 by Aleksandar S. Santrac. The Sola Scriptura Principle in the Current Debate1 Aleksandar S. Santrac, D.Phil., Ph.D. Professor of Religion, Philosophy & Ethics University of the Southern Caribbean, Trinidad, WI Extraordinary Associate Professor of Dogmatics North-West University, RSA Introduction In this article, I would like to present the contemporary Evangelical position on the sola scriptura principle, in the context of ecumenical dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church and the brief conversation with a current Adventist position. The preliminary working definition of the sola scriptura principle, from the conventional Protestant/Evangelical standpoint, may include: i. the primary and absolute authority of the Scripture, as originally given, as the final court of appeal for all doctrine and practice; ii. the sufficiency of the Scripture as the final written authority of God; iii. the clearness (perspicuity) of the essential biblical message; iv. the primacy of the Scriptures over all tradition rather than a total rejection of tradition and, v. the principle that Scripture interprets Scripture without external authority.2 1 This article is partially a brief excerpt from my Sola Scriptura: Benedict XVI’s Theology of the Word of God, PhD dissertation, North-West University, RSA, 2012. 2 Norman L. Geisler & Ralph E. MacKenzie, Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: Agreements and Differences (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1995), 178-179. 107 JOURNAL
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Scripture and Nature: Pentecostal Hermeneutics and Their Implications for The
    Article Reading Scripture and Nature: Pentecostal Hermeneutics and Their Implications for the Contemporary Evangelical Amos Yong Theology and Science Conversation Amos Yong This article recommends that more intentional focus on the theological character of the biblical message that involves the work of the Holy Spirit can be helpful in resisting the concordism, prevalent in some evangelical circles, that insists on harmonizing Scripture with science. Help in developing such an interpretive approach can be found, surprisingly, in Pentecostal Bible-reading practices. Our case study of Pente- costal hermeneutical sensibilities opens up space for a reading of nature that is complementary with a reading of Scripture. The objective is to invite evangelical Christians to develop a theology and hermeneutic of nature that sustains the scientific enterprise even while registering Pentecostal perspectives, especially in the dialogue between theology and science. any conservative evangelicals Insofar as many Pentecostals consider Mare concordists when it comes conservative evangelicals their allies and to their views regarding how agreewiththemabouttheauthority, the Bible relates to modern science.1 infallibility, and even inerrancy of the What this means is that they assume that Bible,tothesamedegreemanyPente- the plain sense of Scripture, rightly under- costals also presume a concordist her- stood, should be confirmable by and har- meneutic along with the accompanying monizable with—be in concord—rather young-earth view of the world. This than contradict the findings of modern explains, at least in part, why many Pen- science, correctly interpreted. When ap- tecostals are creationists who are suspi- plied to the creation narrative in the book cious, at best, about the theory of of Genesis, however, such expectations evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evangelical Culture of Anti—Intellectualism As a Local Strategy
    Volume 4 Number 1 Article 1 2020 “Knowledge Puffs Up”: The Evangelical Culture of Anti—Intellectualism as a Local Strategy Mark Ward Sr. University of Houston-Victoria, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/sermonstudies Part of the Anthropological Linguistics and Sociolinguistics Commons, and the Organizational Communication Commons Recommended Citation Ward, Mark Sr.. "“Knowledge Puffs Up”: The Evangelical Culture of Anti—Intellectualism as a Local Strategy." Sermon Studies 4.1 (2020) : 1-21. https://mds.marshall.edu/sermonstudies/vol4/iss1/1 Copyright 2020 by Mark Ward Sr. This Original Article is brought to you by Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact the editor at [email protected] “Knowledge Puffs Up”: The Evangelical Culture of Anti—Intellectualism as a Local Strategy Cover Page Footnote Mark Ward Sr. is an associate professor of communication at the University of Houston-Victoria This article is available in Sermon Studies: https://mds.marshall.edu/sermonstudies/vol4/iss1/1 Ward Sr.: The Evangelical Culture of Anti-Intellectualism “Knowledge Puffs Up”: The Evangelical Culture of Anti-Intellectualism as a Local Strategy1 Mark Ward Sr. “Knowledge [does] what?” asked Pastor Lonnie,2 stepping to the side of his pulpit and cupping his hand to his ear to elicit a response from the audience. “Puffs up!” answered the 140 souls gathered for the Sunday morning service at Riverside Bible Church, a nondenominational and evangelical congregation located in a midsized city of the southwestern United States. Seated in my usual pew that morning, I was not surprised that Lonnie’s flock could so easily fill in the phrase taken from 1 Corinthians 8:1, “Now about food sacrificed to idols: We know that ‘We all possess knowledge.’ But knowledge puffs up while love builds up” (NIV).
    [Show full text]
  • SOLA SCRIPTURA, INERRANTIST FUNDAMENTALISM, and the WESLEYAN QUADRILATERAL: IS "NOCREED but the Biblena WORKABLE SOLUTION?
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Autumn 1997, Vol. 35, No. 2,211-226 Copyright O 1997 by Andrews University Press. SOLA SCRIPTURA, INERRANTIST FUNDAMENTALISM, AND THE WESLEYAN QUADRILATERAL: IS "NOCREED BUT THE BIBLEnA WORKABLE SOLUTION? WOODROWW. WHIDDEN Andrews University Berrien Springs, MI 49104 Introduction American Bible-believing Protestants have given firm support to the finality of biblical authority in doctrinal formation. This scripturally oriented heritage certainly has its source in the issues which erupted out of the sixteenth-century Reformation's resort to and emphasis upon the sola Scriptwa principle. The issue which this article addresses is whether conservative Protestants can, in all honesty, continue to give assent to this venerable principle.1 While other traditions will be mentioned, the focus of this essay will be on the way Wesleyans have sought to come to terms with the practical problems raised by sola Scriptura. This will be addressed through a clarification of the way their use of the so-called Quadrilateral can be instructive for other traditions which take scriptural authority seriously. Before we address some historic trends which have rendered soh Scriptura problematic and seek to clarify the implications of the Quadrilateral methodology, a brief sketch of the way sola Scriptura has evolved in the American Protestant Bible-believing tradition is in order. A North American Historical Sketch Much of the practical interaction with Scripture is still under the shadow of the yeasty individualism of the early nineteenth century. In that time sola Smptura evolved into such radical slogans as "No creed but 'Probably the best review of the historical and hermeneutical vagaries which surrounded rhk Reformation appropriation of sola Scriptura is given by ~linerMcGrath, Reformation Thought (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988), 95-116; and idem, The Intellecttral Origins of the European Reformation (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987), 140-174.
    [Show full text]