DOCSLIB.ORG

Robot, Fight! the Amateur Robotics Movement in the United States John P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robot, Fight! the Amateur Robotics Movement in the United States John P Fight! Robot, Fight! The Amateur Robotics Movement in the United States John P. Sullins, Sonoma State University, United States of America Abstract: The study of Robotics was once the exclusive realm of elite research universities and corporations. The costs and logistics of building, programming, and maintaining a robotics platform in past generations were too high for the hobbyist or independent researcher. Over the last decade this has radically changed. Amateur robotics clubs are thriving, and knowledge generated by the robotics and AI research projects of the past, is now converging with the home and amateur robotics movement through inexpensive robotics platforms such as the Lego® Mindstorms™ kits. In addition to this, robot fighting leagues have also become very popular wherein participant build ingenious machines of destruction, whichthey operate via telerobotics in mock gladiatorial combat. The convergence of high-tech expertise with the home and amateur user presents a fascinating case study of the successful introduction of AI technologies into our everyday lives. We will look at how home users and hobbyists are creatively reshaping AI technology and identify the social values that are impacting, and being impacted by, the development of the home robotics community. In this paper I will review some of the recent de- velopments in the home robotics movement that point towards greater collaborative research in robotics across cultures and between professional and hobbyist. OCKED IN A cage with transparent Lexan shows that showcase robot fighting such as Battle walls, two combatants take their positions at Bots®, or Robot Wars®, few people know that there Lopposite corners. The master of ceremonies are hundreds of amateur organizations where people introduces the contestants along with their meet on the weekends to pursue their dreams of builders then, with a shout of “fight robots, fight!” mechanical mayhem. The machines begin to circle each other while hun- In addition to these activities, there is also a very dreds of spectators cheer them on. Each of the robotic large, and still growing, industry in educational ro- contestants weighs in at more than one hundred botics. Here the concentration is on building teams kilograms and the arena resounds as they batter the and understanding technology through the use of cage, and each other, in their efforts to destroy their robots, which are built to compete in various ball antagonist. Finally, in a shower of sparks and acrid sports or other technical challenges. smoke one of the robots ceases to function, and the While much of the activity I will focus on in this bout is over. The crowd cheers the surviving machine paper is taking place in the United States, amateur as it spins in victorious celebration. Off to the side robotics is a worldwide phenomenon and takes on of the arena, almost unnoticed, the human drivers distinct regional flavours. It is fascinating to compare and builders of the robot take a bow, while those of and contrast, for instance, the amateur robotics enthu- the losing machine haul their wreck back to the pits siast from Japan and Korea with their counterparts where dozens of other robot enthusiast prepare their in the US so I will mention a few observations regard- machines for the rest of the days fights. ing that topic as well, all of which I witnessed at the This scene plays itself out dozens of times nearly 2004 Robolympics1 in San Francisco California every weekend in regional, national and international where there was a significant intermixing of robot robot fighting events. While many people are famil- fighters and educational robo-enthusiasts from both iar with the professional, highly polished, television sides of the Pacific. 1 This event is now called the Robogames (http://robogames.net/). Figure 1: Fighting Robots battle in the Arena at the 2004 Robolympics in San Francisco California. Photo taken by the author. teen-year collaboration between the LEGO® Group Important Events in American Amateur of Denmark and the MIT Media Lab (Brand 1987, Robotics Ferrari 2002). It grew out of Seymour Papert’s work on the LOGO Turtle robotic toys that were developed Robotics and automation has a long and interesting in the late 70’s at the Media lab as an educational past beginning with the clockwork automata of the tool (Papert 1980). Refining the ideas advanced in eighteenth century (Brooks 2002). Research in robot- the LOGO Turtle project further, LEGO® Mind- ics, has up until now, largely been the province of storms™ is a very powerful toy that couples the big industry and academia.2 But, by the 1970’s ama- wonderfully engineered LEGO® bricks building teur robotics began to take shape, emerging from the systems with a brain brick or (RCX) that encases a hobby electronics industry. In 1977 the Robotics Hitachi H8 microcontroller to which can be attached Society of America was organized as a non-profit various sensors to give it information about its sur- group of like-minded hobbyists who meet to trade roundings and motors to power one’s robot for ideas and inspiration. There are many organizations motility and other actions. In addition to these com- and clubs like the RSA but it is one of the largest. ponents, there are the ingenious software packages These groups have traditionally been interested in that are used to program the brick. Some of these making autonomous mobile robots that do things programs are proprietary, such as the Mindstorms™ like navigate through a maze, follow lines drawn on or LEGO® LAB™, programming environments, but the ground, walk or crawl over uneven terrain, etc. others are freeware such as the more powerful NQC These early garage experimenters were hampered and Bircx Command Centre, which were developed by the cost of computer and electronic parts, but by by home robotics enthusiasts to enhance the capabil- the late eighties and early nineties this constraint was ities of these machines. beginning to change. Today robotics enthusiasts have While LEGO® Mindstorms™ is the most popular, access to kits and components that only large well- there are many other robotics kits available, ranging funded research institutions could have afforded in from the very inexpensive and basic, to those that the past. This change has brought about a minor are more expensive but with more power and versat- renaissance in home robotics that has greatly expan- ility. Still, even the most expensive kits are less then ded the membership in hobby robotics groups. Today a couple thousand dollars and give the home experi- there are hundreds of these organizations that cater menter access to components and software that used to all ages and all skill levels. to be very expensive indeed and in past decades Important innovations would have been available only to large research in- stitutions. There are a number of important recent innovations There are also a number of retail outlets such as that have encouraged the blossoming of the home Mondotronics, The Robot Marketplace, or Robotoys, robotics movement. Chief among them has been the which make it very easy for home users to acquire development of the LEGO® Mindstorms™ kit. Re- leased in 1998, this kit was the culmination of a fif- 2 For a good review of academic and industrial research in autonomous robotics as of the turn of the century see Menzel and D’aluisio, Robosapiens, MIT Press 2000. all manner of robotic technology.3 In fact, the it is growing quickly. According to studies by the growing demand for robotics in consumer electronics Japan Robotics Association, the United Nations is now being addressed by tradeshows specifically Economic Commission, and the International Feder- designed for robotics companies to showcase their ation of Robotics, in 2005 the personal and service mobile robotics products. Two of these events are robotics market will be worth $5.4 Billion, equal that called RoboNexus and RoboBusiness and are proving of industrial robotics, and by 2025 is projected to be to be well attended.4 While this market is nowhere about $51.7 billion or four times the size of the indus- near as large as that of the personal computer, it is trial robotics market, and this is excluding military as large as that of traditional industrial robotics, and and small toy robotics sales.5 Figure 2: Example of a robot built with the LEGO® Mindstorms™ kit. Photo taken by the author. The most thriving commercial robotics product to date has been the explosion of robotic vacuum The Dual Trajectory of American cleaners starting in 2003. In the US, Asia, and Amateur Robotics Europe, a number of companies such as Hitachi and Kärcher have ventured into this market (Kahney Even though home and hobby robotics is a relatively 2003). In the US the most successful has been an recent development, it is already too difficult to fol- upstart company called iRobot.6 Their robotic vacu- low all of the various fads and trends taking place. um product, the Roomba ®, sells for under $200 Still, in American amateur robotics we can easily (US), and is sold in a number of big retail outlets. see two main trajectories developing one in robot By July 2004 it had sold over 500,000 robots. One fighting leagues and the other in education. Bothof of the most interesting things about this machine is these trends are worth looking at from the standpoint that home users have begun to hack them in order to of the philosophy of technology as they provide make them smarter, or faster, or just more fun.7 The provocative case studies for exploring the social company iRobot, co-founded by the famous MIT values that are shaping this emerging technology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems
    Spring 2015 Industry Study Final Report Robotics and Autonomous Systems The Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy National Defense University Fort McNair, Washington, D.C. 20319-5062 i ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS 2015 ABSTRACT: The Robotics and Autonomous Systems (RAS) industry plays a critical role producing America’s preferred means of global power projection: unmanned aircraft systems. But in a larger sense, RAS technology has also altered the defense industry’s relationship with DoD, as the defense sector increasingly finds itself following commercial sector innovations. This report outlines the major issues affecting the defense sector of the RAS industry and DoD’s ability to acquire and employ RAS. It then makes recommendations to enable DoD to better capitalize on the technology, strengthen its relationship with the industry and ultimately improve the nation’s warfighting capability. BG Mordechay Baruch, Israeli Defense Force LTC Clinton Cox, US Army Mr. Terry Emmert, Office Secretary Defense COL Daniel Friend, US Army Mr. Riley Jay, National Geospatial Agency Lt Col Linell Letendre, US Air Force Lt Col Robert Masaitis, US Air Force Mr. David Mico, Dept of State Lt Col Kevin Murray, US Marine Corps Lt Col Richard Neitzey, US Marine Corps Dr. Jeffery Paull, Dept of Navy CDR Jerome Smith, US Navy COL Stephanie Tutton, US Army Mr. Thomas Wilson, Veterans Affairs Lt Col Lori Winn, US Air Force CAPT Matthew Pregmon, US Navy, Faculty lead COL David Shugart, US Army, Faculty ii PLACES VISITED Domestic:
    [Show full text]
  • RPN Spring13
    Spring 2013 Volume Forty-Nine ROLAND PARK NEWS Saying Goodbye…and Thank You…to Mille Fleurs By Kate Culotta medical school. Her residency at the University of We first became acquainted with Mille Fleurs about Maryland brought her to Maryland. Even before she 18 years ago, when fledgling florists Diane Pappas completed her medical training, she knew it wasn’t and Kathy Quinn took over the former But No going to be enough. Bunnies, a children’s clothing store in Wyndhurst When Pappas asked her husband for advice, he Station. Pappas and Quinn said, “Practice medicine first met during a two-year for a year, and if you’re certificate Florist Program not completely happy, you at Dundalk Community have my blessing to do College. Quinn wanted something else.” to leave her position with local interior designer, Rita One year later, Diane St. Clair, and Pappas was started taking classes at a practicing physician with Dundalk Community specialties in radiology and College and made a mammography. The pair ran new friend. Mille Fleurs together until It didn’t take long for two years ago, when Quinn’s Mille Fleurs, with Pappas other love, animal rescue, and Quinn at the helm, pulled at her heartstrings to make a name for itself, and pulled her away to start bringing sophisticated another adventure. floral designs and When I sat down with unparalleled service to Pappas a few weeks ago, I its clients. Even from the asked about her “it” talent. As start, the shop’s mantra I am in a creative field myself, has been “quality and I know you’ve either got it or service first.” Pappas has you don’t.
    [Show full text]
  • City News and Recreation Guide
    Summer 20 19 CITY NEWS AND RECREATION GUIDE IN THIS ISSUE First annual San Marcos Off-leash parks give San Marcos service Summer Bags N’ Brews event traffic solutions dogs a place to play app coming soon Recreation Guide Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 5 Page 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summer 2019 City News Open for fitness: Adult Outdoor Fitness Zone 3 First annual Bags N’ Brews event 3 SAN MARCOS 360 is published three times per State of the City address available online 3 year by the City of San Marcos. San Marcos traffic solutions 4 Editor Sarah Macdonald Honk Less, Wave More 4 Recreation Editor Cheryl Salazar Off-leash parks give dogs a place to play 5 Art Director Kelly Grady San Marcos service app coming soon 5 JPW Communications Economic development highlights 6 Photography Brant Bender Photography Don Boomer Photography City smoking policy updates 8 Mark Marquez Photography Keeping PACE and know your evacuation routes 8 Melissa McClure Photography San Marcos Creek Infrastructure project update 9 Copy Writing Leslie Spring Lease space available at City Hall 9 JPW Communications CSUSM Athletics events 10 [email protected] San Marcos photo contest winner announced 10 Recreation Recreation Guide 11 San Marcos Hikes 12 Events at a Glance 13 Facilities and Parks Reservations 14 Parent & Child 19 Early Childhood 21 Adventure Day Camp 26 Swim Lessons 27 Summer Specialty Camps 28 Teens 34 About the cover: Cal State San Marcos Adults 35 students gear up for a game of cornhole. Learn about the City’s new Bags N’ Brews Adults 50+ 37 event on May 4.
    [Show full text]
  • SPARKS ACROSS the GAP: ESSAYS by Megan E. Mericle, B.A
    SPARKS ACROSS THE GAP: ESSAYS By Megan E. Mericle, B.A. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing University of Alaska Fairbanks May 2017 APPROVED: Daryl Farmer, Committee Chair Sarah Stanley, Committee Co-Chair Gerri Brightwell, Committee Member Eileen Harney, Committee Member Richard Carr, Chair Department of English Todd Sherman, Dean College o f Liberal Arts Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School Abstract Sparks Across the Gap is a collection of creative nonfiction essays that explores the humanity and artistry behind topics in the sciences, including black holes, microbes, and robotics. Each essay acts a bridge between the scientific and the personal. I examine my own scientific inheritance and the unconventional relationship I have with the field of science, searching for ways to incorporate research into my everyday life by looking at science and technology through the lens of my own memory. I critique issues that affect the culture of science, including female representation, the ongoing conflict with religion and the problem of separating individuality from collaboration. Sparks Across the Gap is my attempt to parse the confusion, hybridity and interconnectivity of living in science. iii iv Dedication This manuscript is dedicated to my mother and father, who taught me to always seek knowledge with compassion. v vi Table of Contents Page Title Page......................................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • UNH "Smash & Wrecker" Robot Takes on Competitors at Robogames
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Media Relations UNH Publications and Documents 4-15-2010 UNH "Smash & Wrecker" Robot Takes on Competitors at RoboGames April 23 Beth Potier UNH Media Relations Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/news Recommended Citation Potier, Beth, "UNH "Smash & Wrecker" Robot Takes on Competitors at RoboGames April 23" (2010). UNH Today. 3304. https://scholars.unh.edu/news/3304 This News Article is brought to you for free and open access by the UNH Publications and Documents at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Media Relations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNH "Smash & Wrecker" Robot Takes on Competitors at RoboGames April 23 Page 1 of 2 Media Relations Home | Calendar | UNH Home Media Relations UNH "Smash & Wrecker" Robot Takes On Competitors At RoboGames April 23 Apr 15, 2010 DURHAM, N.H. – The microwave didn’t stand a chance. SHARE It was no match for Smash & Wrecker, 205 Print pounds of slicing, pounding robotic destruction created by six University of New Hampshire Email engineering students as their senior capstone project. To prepare for the battlebot’s debut at Subscribe the international RoboGames competition in Facebook San Francisco next week, the electrical and computer engineering majors put Smash & Tweet Wrecker to the test in a Kingsbury Hall parking lot with the discarded microwave serving as its scrimmage partner. Team Smash & Wrecker, UNH electrical and computer UNH’s first-ever battlebot – a remote-controlled robot designed engineering students who have created a battlebot as their senior capstone project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Robotics Market First Half 2012 Results and Trends
    The Robotics Market First Half 2012 Results and Trends This report is based on data supplied to RIA by its member companies. The numbers represent the industrial robot units ordered and shipped, plus the dollar value added to the total robot system. RIA does not include numbers that other countries reporting to the International Federation of Robotics might include as robot units; e.g., RIA does not include four axis chip placement devices in standard electronic assembly machines. Table of Contents 1. First Half News Release 2. First Half 2012 -Application Trends — New Orders • Assembling and Disassembling • Processing • Dispensing • Welding and Soldering (all materials) • Handling Operations/Machine Tending • Other First Half 2012 - Application Trends — Shipments • Assembling and Disassembling • Processing • Dispensing • Welding and Soldering (all materials) • Handling Operations/Machine Tending • Other 3. 2012 vs. 2011 New Orders and Shipments Totals — Units 2012 vs. 2011 New Orders and Shipments Totals — Dollars Robotic Industries Association 900 Victors Way, Suite140 Contact: Jeff Burnstein Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 USA President Telephone: (734) 994-6088 (734) 994-6088 Fax: (734) 994-3338 [email protected] www.Robotics.org PRESS RELEASE North American Robotics Industry Posts Best Quarter Ever, According to New Statistics from RIA (Ann Arbor, Michigan – July 26, 2012) North American robotics companies sold more industrial robots in the second quarter of 2012 than any previous quarter in history, according to new statistics released by Robotic Industries Association (RIA), the industry’s trade group. A total of 5,556 robots valued at $403.1 million were sold to North American companies, a jump of 14% in units and 28% in dollars over the same quarter in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Section D Celia Pearce – Curriculum Vitae Employment and Education History
    Section D Celia Pearce – Curriculum Vitae Employment and Education History Employment 2014–Present Associate Professor of Game Design Northeastern University College of Arts, Media and Design, Department of Art + Design, Boston, MA 2006–2014 Assistant/Associate Professor of Digital Media Georgia Institute of Technology Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts, School of Literature, Media, and Communication, Atlanta, GA 2001–2006 Lecturer/Visiting Researcher/Arts Research Manager (Joint Appointments) University of California, Irvine, Claire Trevor School of the Arts; Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science; California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology (Calit2), Irvine, CA, and San Diego, CA 2006–Present Co-Founder and Festival Chair/Special Project Director IndieCade International Festival of Independent Games 1998–2001 Adjunct Instructor/Interactive Media Program Head/Visiting Researcher University of Southern California School of Cinematic Arts; Information Sciences Institute; Annenberg Center for Communications, Los Angeles, CA, and Marina Del Ray, CA 1989–Present Experience and Game Design Consultant Celia Pearce & Friends, Los Angeles, CA/Atlanta, GA/Boston, MA 1983–1989 Senior Game Designer/Project Manager Edwin Schlossberg Incorporated, New York, NY Education 2006 PhD in Site-Specific Media Arts SMARTlab, Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design, University of the Arts, London Thesis: “Playing Ethnography: A study of emergent behaviour in online games and virtual worlds.” Advisor: Dr. Lizbeth Goodman Note: No prior degrees. Professional accomplishments were accepted in lieu of prior degrees for admission into the PhD program. These included award-winning interactive media projects, scholarly publications including a book, and academic appointments including helping to set up a master’s degree program.
    [Show full text]
  • Battlebots Newsletter: Preparing for Competition March, 2021 As the Newest Design Team, Battlebots Has Never Competed Before
    Battlebots Newsletter: Preparing for Competition March, 2021 As the newest design team, Battlebots has never competed before. Our first competition would have been in March of 2020. However, COVID cancelled all of our events that year. With that being said, the team will be competing with two robots this year: the 15lb robot from 2020 and the 30lb robot from 2021. Students are excited to finally be able to see their robots compete at Bots KC in Kansas City, MO and Norwalk Havoc Robot League in Norwalk, CT. Navigating the logistics of traveling safely to competitions has been a challenge, but we are hopeful everything will work out. The state of what is safe nowadays is always changing and we want to make sure we take all the precautions necessary to compete responsibly. In February, the team performed construction on building a full scale testing enclosure for our robots. The former 12ft square arena has been extensively upgraded. Measuring a full 16ft by 16ft with 8ft ceiling it meets the size of competition standards and allows our team to test and practice safely on a regular basis. The expansion was a whole team effort to construct. We tore down the old enclosure and used its components within the new arena to save cost of the material and manufacturing time. Now that the new box is complete, the team will really be able to see what the robots are capable of on a larger scale. Our new 30lb robot has been named “Option 14”. Its name is somewhat of an inside joke on the team.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Robotics: a Tool for Application-Based Integration of Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Concepts and Research
    AC 2010-22: MOBILE ROBOTICS: A TOOL FOR APPLICATION-BASED INTEGRATION OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY UNDERGRADUATE CONCEPTS AND RESEARCH Carlotta Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Berry is an assistant professor in the department of electrical and computer engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is one of the principal investigators on the multidisciplinary educational robotics initiative and the Rose building undergraduate diversity program. Her research areas include the design and evaluation of human-robot interfaces and innovations in engineering education using active learning and mobile robotics. Page 15.877.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 “Mobile Robotics: A tool for application-based integration of multidisciplinary undergraduate concepts and research” Abstract This paper presents the development of a mobile robotics course at the primarily undergraduate engineering school, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. This course is one of the final courses in the multidisciplinary educational robotics certificate program. The purpose of this course is to use the robot to provide the students with an appreciation of their discipline and how it applies to other disciplines. It is hypothesized that students will gain a more realistic model of their future workplace demographic while also learning about robotics theory and the open areas of robotics research. Introduction Undergraduate students in science and engineering frequently express a desire to relate the abstract theory presented in class to real-world or practical application. One method that can be used to integrate component theory with system or practical application is robotics. Since robotics theory includes topics such as sensors, controls, mechatronics, kinematics, microcontroller programming, embedded systems and software development; it is an ideal model for multidisciplinary application.
    [Show full text]
  • An Industrial Robotics Course for Manufacturing Engineers
    Paper ID #15654 An Industrial Robotics Course for Manufacturing Engineers Dr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Dr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering and Chair of the Engineering and Design Department at Western Washington University. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Industrial Robotics Course for Manufacturing Engineers For many years the automobile industry was the home to more than half of the robots used in U.S. manufacturing. Recently, however, many other industries have been or are planning to introduce robots into their manufacturing processes.1 In the Pacific Northwest region several companies in aerospace, electronics, apparel, and commercial cookware have either introduced robots or ex- panded their use in recent years. As such, an introduction to robotics in the context of manufac- turing is becoming more important for students pursuing degrees in Manufacturing Engineering. There is, however, always a challenge when teaching robotics to find the correct balance between application and modeling. Many robotics courses taught in Electrical or Mechanical Engineering Departments have a tendency to emphasize modeling over application, but a well-prepared Man- ufacturing Engineer needs to understand where the challenges in robotics applications lie as well as understanding what is going on ‘under the hood’. A quick survey of the 21 ABET accredited Manufacturing Engineering programs indicates that only five have a manufacturing specific ro- botics course, and three of those are special topics courses that are not offered consistently.2 Other programs have robotics integrated into a general automation class, have cross-listed classes with other programs, or have graduate classes on robotics that are available to seniors, so there are not the same opportunities for depth or focus on manufacturing applications.
    [Show full text]
  • State of California Employment Training Panel
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TRAINING PANEL MEETING California Environmental Protection Agency 1001 “I” Street Sierra Hearing Room, 2nd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 March 25, 2011 PANEL MEMBERS Barry Broad Acting Chair Sonia Fernandez Member Barton Florence Member Janine Montoya Member Edward Rendon Member Janice Roberts Acting Vice-Chair Sam Rodriguez Member Michael Webb Member Executive Staff Brian McMahon Executive Director Maureen Reilly General Counsel STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT TRAINING PANEL MEETING California Environmental Protection Agency 1001 “I” Street Sierra Hearing Room, 2nd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 March 25, 2011 I. PUBLIC PANEL MEETING CALL TO ORDER Bart Florence, Acting Chair, called the meeting to order at 9:36 a.m. II. ROLL CALL Present Sonia Fernandez Bart Florence Janine Montoya Sam Rodriguez Michael Webb Absent Barry Broad Janice Roberts Edward Rendon Executive Staff Present Brian McMahon, Executive Director Maureen Reilly, General Counsel III. AGENDA ACTION: Ms. Fernandez moved and Ms. Montoya seconded the motion that the Panel approve the Agenda. Motion carried, 5 - 0. IV. MINUTES ACTION: Ms. Montoya moved and Mr. Rodriguez seconded the motion that the Panel approve the Minutes from the January 28, 2011 Panel meeting. Motion carried, 5 - 0. V. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Brian McMahon, Executive Director, welcomed all applicants and partners present and said that today the Panel will begin the process of hearing the first group of projects that were submitted Employment Training Panel March 25, 2011 Page 1 upon opening the application cycle in this budget year on December 1, 2010. He said there is also a small number of remaining 2009 pipeline projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Robot Competition, Design of Labyrinth and Robotdemo Työn Ohjaaja: Juha Räty Työn Valmistumislukukausi Ja -Vuosi: Kevät 2013 Sivumäärä: 85 + 8 Liitettä
    Alfonso Antonio Reyes Jaramillo ROBOT COMPETITION, DESIGN OF LABYRINTH AND ROBOTDEMO ROBOT COMPETITION, DESIGN OF LABYRINTH AND ROBOTDEMO Alfonso Antonio Reyes Jaramillo Bachelor’s Thesis Spring 2013 Tietotekniikan koulutusohjelma Oulun seudun ammattikorkeakoulu TIIVISTELMÄ Oulun seudun ammattikorkeakoulu Tietotekniikan koulutusohjelma, Tekijä: Alfonso Antonio Reyes Jaramillo Opinnäytetyön nimi: Robot Competition, Design of Labyrinth and RobotDemo Työn ohjaaja: Juha Räty Työn valmistumislukukausi ja -vuosi: Kevät 2013 Sivumäärä: 85 + 8 liitettä Tämä opinnäytetyö sai alkunsa tuntiopettaja Juha Rädyn ehdotuksesta. Ehdotettu teema oli robottikilpailu, labyrinttiradan suunnittelu kilpailua varten sekä robotti, joka nimettiin RobotDemoksi. Labyrintin malli perustui esikolumbiaanisen ajan Perun muinaiskaupungin palatsin rakenteeseen. Tästä rakenteesta ovat peräisin palatsin L-muoto, pihan U-muoto, toisen pihan suorakulmainen muoto sekä labyrintin pyramidi. Nämä arkkitehtuuriset elementit jaettiin kolmeen alueeseen. Kilpailua varten oli laadittu tietyt säännöt. Näihin sääntöihin kuului ohjeita joukkueille ja järjestäjille. Säännöissä oli lisäksi tekniset määritelmät kahdelle robottikategorialle. Myös säädökset pisteiden jakamisesta määriteltiin. Pisteitä jaettiin roboteille jotka selvittivät labyrintin nopeimmin. Tämän lisäksi robotit saivat myös tietyn määrän pisteitä jokaisesta tehtävästä jonka ne suorittivat. Tämä järjestelmä mahdollisti sen, että robotti saattoi voittaa kilpailun, vaikka se ei olisikaan kaikista nopein. Pistejärjestelmän
    [Show full text]