Subject: Questions to the Mayor Report number: 5 Report to: London Assembly Date: 25/01/06 Report of: Executive Director Of Secretariat
Breakdown of Policing Budget Question No: 1 / 2006 Jenny Jones From next year’s MPA budget, can you provide the approximate allocations for 1) counter terrorism and security, 2) safer neighbourhood policing, 3) general territorial policing, 4) serious crimes, 5) road safety and transport policing, 6) public order policing, 7) other (please specify)?
A detailed service analysis of the MPS Budget for 2006/07 was included within my Consultation Budget (see Section 2.3 on page 8) which does show budgets for the main business groups within the MPS such as Territorial Policing, Specialist Crime, Special Operations etc. However, a detailed analysis by the headings requested is not possible as many of them are not separately identified within the overall budget.
In addition, the costs of support directorates such as Directorate of Information, Resources and Human Resources are shown separately and are not apportioned to operational groups - which, of course, would be needed if the budget were to be allocated across the requested (and similar) headings.
The MPS continues to implement and refine its Activity Based Costing. A report entitled "MPS Development of police Activity Based Costing (ABC): 2004-05 results" went to Finance Committee on the 19th January which provides more of the activity analysis requested. A relevant table from that report is shown attached as Appendix A.
Spending on Counter Terrorism Question No: 2 / 2006 Jenny Jones How much extra will be spent next year by the GLA Group on counter terrorism and security? How will this be allocated in broad terms? How much of the total will be funded by the government?
As at 23 January, unfortunately the Home Office have not yet confirmed the level of Counter Terrorism grant that the MPA/MPS will receive for 2006/07. We have been informed that a new "single pot" for Counter Terrorism is being created from three existing sources but, at that stage, only one element of the new pot has been confirmed.
The estimate of £228m included within the draft budget equates to the sum currently being received from the three separate funding sources. In addition, a sum of £187m for the MPS special grant for international/ national/capital city functions has been included elsewhere in the budget.
LDA and Aviation Question No: 3 / 2006 Darren Johnson How much has the LDA spent on projects related to the aviation industry in each of the last five financial years? In the context of the disastrous impacts that a third runway would have in terms of climate change emissions, noise, and air quality, is it appropriate for the LDA to be funding a project (The Environmental Technologies Project with Brunel University) ‘which may help overcome one of the barriers to further expansion’? In light of your policies on climate change, will you divert money away from aviation towards more sustainable industries in next year’s budget?
Between 2000/01 and 2004/5 the London Development Agency (LDA) spent a total of £5,705,588 on projects related to the aviation industry. This included projects enabling people from the Thames Gateway area to access job opportunities at Stansted Airport and providing high quality Business Support services to mainly BME Micro Businesses in the Heathrow City area. In the year to date the LDA has spent £578,915 on such projects relating to the aviation industry.
Any strategy for increasing airport capacity must be environmentally sustainable in the longer term. I believe that the negative environmental consequences outweigh the economic benefits put forward for the expansion of Heathrow. I am therefore opposed to a third runway at the airport.
The LDA has not provided any funding to Brunel University or anyone else to provide justification for such a runway. The Environmental Technologies Project that you refer to is a feasibility study with Brunel University on the potential for creating a cluster of environmental technology businesses at Heathrow City looking at issues such as waste treatment and pollution control. It is not related to the airport itself.
In order to reduce CO2 emissions from Heathrow airport, one of the largest energy consumers in London, my London Climate Change Agency is working with the BAA on the implementation of cogeneration, trigeneration, renewable energy and low or zero emission ground transport systems which may be delivered through the London Energy Services Company.
Spending on Sport Question No: 4 / 2006 Jenny Jones In your 03/04 budget £87,000 was spent on specifically on sport related initiatives, with £67,000 going towards the London Grand Prix Event. Can you detail what money was spent on sport related initiatives in 04/05 and how much money will be allocated for sport related initiatives in your 05/06 and 06/07 budgets, excluding the Olympics?
GLA Expenditure for 2004/05 is as follows:
£27,200 on sport and social inclusion £10,000 on older people and sport £262,000 on the Kids Swim Free Programme
Total: £299,200
Planned GLA expenditure in 2005/06 breaks down as follows:
£10,000 on the Mayor’s Community Skating Programme £10,000 on physical exercise and health £20,000 on older people and sport £25,000 on London Youth Games £15,000 on the Big Dance health promotion £7,000 on Bangladeshi Cricket Reception £60,000 on the Grand Prix in London
Total: £147,000
Once programme budgets for next year have been confirmed, the allocation for sport will be available but conversations are taking place with the English Cricket Board to develop appropriate events for the touring teams from Sri Lanka and Pakistan.
Motorbikes and Climate Change Question No: 5 / 2006 Jenny Jones Are you aware of the research led by Dr Ana-Marja Vasic of the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing & Research which has found that motorcycles emit 16 times the amount of hydrocarbons produced by cars and three times as much carbon monoxide? Will the evidence, that annual hydrocarbon emissions from the average powered two-wheeler in urban traffic are up to 49 times higher than those from the average car, make you reconsider introducing a reduced congestion charge for motorbikes?
I have not personally seen the research, we should not assume research undertaken elsewhere can directly translate to London. However, particulate matter (PM) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) are the emissions considered most damaging to human health. Motorcycles travelling at average London speeds in the Greater London area are very low emitters of these pollutants as a proportion of road transport emissions.
It should be remembered that the primary objective of Congestion Charging is to reduce congestion in Central London. As I stated in March 2005 powered two-wheelers do not contribute significantly to congestion and as such they are exempt from the Charge. For this reason I will not be considering removing the exemption for motorbikes. Price Signals and Transport Question No: 6 / 2006 Jenny Jones Are you concerned that an overall decline in the cost of motoring since 1997, combined with price rises for Londoners in rail, tube and bus fares, is sending a strong pricing signal that cars are becoming a cheaper option than public transport? What can be done to reverse, or counter, this pricing signal?
Between 2000 and 2004 car use in London has fallen from 44% to 41%. In addition, congestion charging has given a clear signal encouraging reduced car use in the most congested parts of London, and the western extension of congestion charging will further strengthen this.
Fares are only one element in the signal that public transport provides to Londoners. Just as important are the ticketing system, where Oyster is a world leader, and the quality of service.
Central to the future will be the projects and initiatives set out in TfL’s Business Plan and Investment Programme. These are all geared to improving the quality of public transport in London, fares make a vital contribution to funding this programme. Stratford High Street Question No: 7 / 2006 Jenny Jones What plans does TfL have to improve Stratford High Street for pedestrians and cyclists? Do you agree that the re-development of Stratford in the run-up to the Olympics should include measures to make Stratford more pedestrian-friendly?
Newham Council is the highway authority for Stratford High Street and TfL’s jurisdiction is therefore limited. However, TfL would be delighted to work with the Council to seek improvements in provision for pedestrians and cyclists that would not unduly prejudice network operations.
To that end TfL’s Walking, Cycling and Accessibility team met with Newham (and neighbouring boroughs) on 31 January. The aim was to determine and agree appropriate walking and cycling enhancements, both in central Stratford and over the wider area, to ensure the delivery of a sustainable Games and legacy. LDA and Building Standards Question No: 8 / 2006 Darren Johnson Following your response to questions 1836/2005, 2031/2005, and 2377/2005, how do you expect the policy in your Energy Strategy for all LDA developments to achieve ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’ BREEAM ratings to be evaluated if the LDA does not have a policy of commissioning BREEAM assessments on all of its new developments?
I have instructed the LDA to implement the policy of commissioning BREEAM assessments on all of its new developments. Renewable Energy in GLA Buildings Question No: 9 / 2006 Darren Johnson Following your answer to question 2378/2005, as the target in your Energy Strategy for 100% renewable energy in GLA buildings by the end of 2005 appears to have been missed, when do you expect for this target to be met?
As you know from my answer to question 2378/2005 all GLA buildings are supplied by green electricity tariffs except the LDA and LFEPA.
I will ask the LDA and LFEPA to achieve this target by the end of financial year 2006/07. LDA Exemplary Development Question No: 10 / 2006 Darren Johnson Following your answer to questions 1838/2005 and the LDA’s answer to question 587/2005, when do you expect an LDA exemplary low carbon development to be delivered?
This is a high priority, and I have asked my officers to work with the LDA to ensure delivery of an exemplary low carbon development.
The LDA has committed to producing a feasibility study into this in 2006/07, and we hope work will then commence as soon after as is practicable. LDA’s Private Investment Commission and Sustainable Design Question No: 11 / 2006 Darren Johnson Following your answer to question 2380/2005 which confirmed that the LDA’s Private Investment Commission has not addressed the issue of sustainable design and construction, what are you doing to take forward proposal 22 of your Energy Strategy (’The Mayor requests the London Development Agency to ensure that its Private Investment Commission examines the delivery of sustainable design and construction, in order to identify the barriers to and opportunities for increasing investment in sustainable design, and identify to high-profile exemplary projects.’)?
The London Development Agency (LDA) is working to embed sustainable design and construction principles in all its development activity. Sustainable design and construction is a key consideration on all LDA major development projects including the Olympics and Crystal Palace Park. An internal toolkit has been developed as a means of facilitating this. Over the next few years the toolkit will be implemented on LDA owned sites as the development opportunities arise and the LDA will also be promoting sustainable design and construction with their development partners.
In terms of exemplary projects, over the next year the LDA will be identifying work required to take forward a low carbon development and identify potential locations.
On behalf of the GLA family the LDA organises quarterly meetings of the “Developer Forum” with a range of private developers, registered social landlords and other stakeholders to discuss key issues of interest among the development community. We have the opportunity at future meetings to take the issue of sustainable design and construction to the table. LDA and Energy Saving Question No: 12 / 2006 Darren Johnson Following your answers to questions 1836/2005, 1838/2005, 2031/2005, 2377/2005, 2378/2005, and 2380/2005, are you concerned that LDA is not complying with the policies in your Energy Strategy on environmental building standards (BREEAM/Ecohomes assessments), green electricity, exemplary zero-carbon developments and investment in sustainable design? Will you commission a review of functional bodies’ compliance with your Energy Strategy?
Climate change is obviously becoming an increasingly important priority, and I will ask my officers to prioritise working with the LDA to achieve the policies in the Energy Strategy.
I do not propose to commission a review of Functional Bodies’ compliance with the Energy Strategy, although the Assembly Environment Committee may wish to do this. Olympics and Food Question No: 13 / 2006 Jenny Jones Will the procurement strategy for the ODA contracts cover food, given the large amount of food that will be consumed during the construction phase and the environmental impact of that volume of food?
The Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) procurement strategy will apply to everything the ODA procures, and as far as possible to supplies and services procured by subcontractors. Research on Olympics Procurement Question No: 14 / 2006 Jenny Jones What studies are being conducted on the most sustainable ways to source energy, water, food, and building materials, and to deal with waste in relation to the Olympics during the construction, Games and legacy phases? Do you agree that such studies are necessary to inform a sustainable procurement process for the Olympics and achieve ambitious sustainability targets?
The interim Olympic Delivery Authority is currently developing a set of sustainable development performance standards which will apply to the Olympic Park development, which includes amongst other things; energy, waste, water, and the use of materials, drawing on good practice and undertaking research where appropriate. This work forms part of the development of the ODA’s Sustainable Development Strategy, one of the strategies required to be developed prior to the commencement of development as part of the planning permission. ODA procurement will be in accordance with these standards, when they are agreed. Air Quality and Olympics Construction Question No: 15 / 2006 Jenny Jones What measures will be in place to mitigate the deterioration of air quality likely to result from the Olympics construction and demolition phase? Are you concerned by the recent ‘Olympic Games Impact Study’, which suggested that the air quality impact in the Lower Lea Valley would be ‘very negative’?
Environmental considerations have been an important factor in considering the design, construction and operation of the Olympic Park. Environmental impact will be monitored through the development of the park and the delivery of the Games. Dust control and air pollution are two key issues that will be addressed through the Code of Construction Practice – one of 40 strategies that must be submitted to the planning authority before work begins on site. The interim ODA is currently evaluating how it may assure the highest standards of environmental management (including health, safety and environmental controls) during the construction works. To this end, it is actively developing arrangements for pre-qualification, award of contracts and contract monitoring to ensure that, amongst other things, dust and emission control is properly addressed. Best Practice Guidance on reducing emissions of dust and particulates from construction and demolition sites for use by London boroughs and developers, as detailed in a forthcoming GLA/ALG consultation, will be adopted for the Olympic developments. Construction Waste and Olympics Question No: 16 / 2006 Darren Johnson What safeguards are you putting in place to ensure construction waste from the Olympics and Stratford City development is not disposed of on greenbelt land in and around London?
Waste is an important consideration in the development of the Olympic Park site. The Olympic Park planning permission states that the development cannot be commenced until a Waste Management Framework (which is to be based on the principles of ‘sustainable resources use’) which forms part of the Sustainable Development Strategy has been approved by the Local Planning Authorities. The interim Olympic Delivery Authority and London Development Agency are currently looking at measures which will reduce the overall amount of waste generated. Where waste is transported off site, it will be disposed of at an appropriate licensed site (where licenses are issued by the Environment Agency). Cycle Barriers at Ravensbury Park Question No: 17 / 2006 Darren Johnson Merton Council has recently installed barriers at either end of Ravensbury Park making it impossible to negotiate by cycle without getting off. Given that this cycle route is marked on the TfL cycle map will you ask TfL officers to intervene to try and resolve the situation and make the route fully accessible to cyclists?
I have asked TfL to take up this issue with LB Merton. Biggin Hill Airport Question No: 18 / 2006 Darren Johnson Will you join with MPs, MEPs, Assembly members, councillors, and Bromley residents in welcoming the report ‘The case for the Community’, prepared by Flightpath, the alliance of residents associations opposed to additional development at Biggin Hill Airport?
The ‘Case for the Community’ report drafted by Flightpath was a well researched and detailed analysis of the issues raised in the Biggin Hill Masterplan.
As I stated in 0712/2005 many of the issues raised in the masterplan document relate to the lease between that landowners, Bromley Council and the operator. This is not a matter for my consideration. Flyposting Question No: 19 / 2006 Darren Johnson Will you ensure TfL work jointly with Islington Council in making full use of their statutory powers to deal with flyposting on the Northern Line ventilation shaft at Pentonville Rd N1/Weston Rise WC1 junction and the Public Carriage Office at 15 Penton Street N1?
TfL is developing proposals for cladding to the Northern Line ventilation shaft on the City Road / Goswell Road island as part of a package of streetscape improvements, planned for summer 2006. It is proposed to incorporate murals on the cladding, subject to further discussions with Islington Council and local stakeholders. The cladding will be coated with an anti flyposting treatment.
By the end of February, the hoarding adjacent to the Public Carriage Office’s entrance will be removed and replaced with a hoarding to which fly-posters cannot be fixed.
TfL recognize the detrimental effect that flyposting can have and has provided anti flyposting treatment on street furniture in a number of areas. However, TfL’s powers under the Highways Act are limited. Local authorities have wider powers and TfL is working closely with them to encourage greater activity in pursuing offenders. Design and Construction Standards Question No: 20 / 2006 Darren Johnson In the response to question number 580/2005 (FBQT 7 December 2005), the LDA highlighted the role of your forthcoming Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) for Sustainable Design and Construction in helping to ensure that new housing in the Thames Gateway meets sustainability criteria. However, while I recognise the importance of sustainable design and construction, the question, asked how the quality of design and construction - which is a substantially wider issue - will be improved and upheld. What mechanisms, therefore, are in place to ensure that the London Thames Gateway Development Corporation and other local planning authorities in the wider Thames Gateway region will insist on high standards of design and construction other than in respect of sustainability criteria? Are you confident that LTGDC has the resources and expertise to insist on these standards even under threat of developer appeal?
My London Plan sets good design as central to all its objectives and the need for good design is rooted firmly in the plan's policies. I have policies that set out principles to be followed to achieve high quality design for London and this policy (4B.1) states that these principles should be used in assessing planning applications, drawing up planning frameworks and UDP (now LDD) policies. Policy 4B.2 specifically seeks to promote world-class design and also the involvement of the GLA Architecture and Urbanism Unit (AUU). The AUU are working closely with the Development Corporation and the local authorities to achieve high standards of design and construction on developments across the Gateway. My London Plan policies are also used to assess strategic applications referred to me so I have in place a strong strategic policy framework to support achieving high quality design. There is a general shortage of planning officers across London, the Development Corporation is a new organisation and it is too early to say what effect this will have. Olympics and Draft Procurement Principles Question No: 21 / 2006 Darren Johnson Which London stakeholders have been consulted on the draft procurement principles and strategy being developed for the Olympics? Has London Remade been consulted?
I published the procurement principles document in September last year. Since then, it has been sent to a large number of organisations who have expressed interest, including London Remade, some of which have submitted comments. Bird Flu Question No: 22 / 2006 Darren Johnson Can you update us on your plans to deal with the threat of bird flu?
Defra has reviewed its overall risk assessment of the threat posed by highly pathogenic Avian Influenza. In light of the recent cases in China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Croatia and Romania it concludes that there is a high risk of further global dispersion. It assesses the risk to the UK as increased but still low.
The GLA is continuing to work with London Resilience to monitor, assess and respond to the risks posed by current outbreaks in the Far East and elsewhere.
To address the risk of the bird flu virus mutating into a form that would result in human-to-human transmission I provided an update to the Assembly on the status of the GLA group pandemic flu response plan on 14 December. The plan is now in the process of being submitted to the functional bodies and MPS for formal ratification. We will provide a copy of the plan to BMAC for noting.
The plan complements the business continuity plans - in place in the GLA, the MPS and each of the FBs - that detail how essential services will be maintained in the event of a pandemic.
International Day of Homophobia Question No: 23 / 2006 Darren Johnson What plans have you got for City Hall to mark International Day of Homophobia on May 17th?
I supported the first International Day Against Homophobia (IDAHO) in May 2005 by issuing a message of support that was distributed widely. My officers are currently exploring options for further involvement this year. I want London to have zero tolerance of homophobic hate crime and support measures to eradicate homophobia including supporting Stonewall’s Education For All campaign to tackle the problem of endemic homophobic bullying in London’s schools through the production of a teaching resource. New Year’s Message Question No: 24 / 2006 Darren Johnson Do you feel that your 45-second New Year’s message playing on a continuous loop for over two hours at Parliament Square enhanced the enjoyment of the crowds gathered to celebrate the New Year?
The Screen on Parliament Square is erected to show the hour-long BBC programme between 11.30 and 12.30 which includes live uninterrupted coverage of the London Fireworks. Outside of this time it is used to broadcast safety and travel messages to the public and, this year, a four- minute promotional video from Visit London focussing on our famous visitor attractions. This did not include a message from myself Vauxhall Cross Question No: 25 / 2006 Jenny Jones Can you provide the road casualty figures for Vauxhall Cross in the three years before the current road lay out was put in place, and for the period since the new layout has been operating? Can you give specific figures for cyclists? Are you convinced that the new layout is safer? My Adviser, Mark Watts, has looked into this matter and would be happy to discuss this with you further. Sporting Facilities Question No: 26 / 2006 Jenny Jones As part of your review of the London Plan, will you give clear planning guidance requiring boroughs to allocate land specifically for sporting facilities in areas of deficiency?
The London Plan (Policy 3D.5) already makes clear that “the Mayor will work with strategic partners to promote and develop sporting facilities ….. in reviewing UDPs, boroughs should identify sites for a range of sports facilities to meet local, sub regional and wider needs. In considering proposals for sports facilities, boroughs should ensure that: -“a sequential approach is applied” -“sites have good access by public transport, cycling and walking or improved access is planned” -“facilities are accessible to all sections of the community, including disable people” -“new provision is focused on areas with existing deficiencies in facilities” -“the multiple use of facilities is encouraged including those of schools and commercial organisations.”
As a pan London policy this provides adequate broad strategic guidance. However, the Statement of Intent for review of the London Plan does indicate that it needs refinement to take account of provision associated with the Olympic and Paralympic games. It is hoped to produce Best Practice Guidance on sports provision which will provide more specific detail on implementation of policy. Sporting Facilities Question No: 27 / 2006 Jenny Jones As part of your review of the London Plan, will you give clear planning guidance requiring boroughs to provide at least one swimming facility per 20,000 residents and at least one athletics facility per 30,000 residents?
London Plan policy 3D.5 (see response to MQT 26/2006) provides a broader and more locally sensitive strategic policy direction than the approach you suggest. However, your suggested ‘standards’ based approach will inform preparation of Best Practice Guidance on sports provision. Economic Benefit of Physical Activity Question No: 28 / 2006 Jenny Jones Will you agree to commission work to develop an economic model to demonstrate the benefits to the public purse, through reduced need for health care and increased educational achievement, of people taking regular exercise? Would you then use this model to lobby central government and boroughs to provide more funds for local sports facilities?
I would be reluctant to commission any new research in this area because economic modelling has already been undertaken.
For example, the Department of Health in Northern Ireland developed a health economics model looking specifically at the cost benefits of physical activity. The model projected substantial direct savings to the NHS as well as associated economic benefits, based on relatively conservative estimates of reductions in disease levels due to increase physical activity.
In addition, a report by the Chief Medical Officer has calculated that physical inactivity costs the UK economy £8.2bn every year of which £1.7bn in NHS costs, £5.4bn is the cost of absence from work and £1bn is lost through early mortality.
So the economic case for increased physical activity among the general population is well understood.
I will look to discuss this issue further in my regular meetings with the DH and London NHS, in particular, how the ‘Delivering Choosing Health’ agenda can engage with the London boroughs and other agencies to increase access to, and take-up of, sports and leisure opportunities in the capital. London Green Lifestyle Show Question No: 29 / 2006 Darren Johnson Why is the London Green Lifestyle Show held last year not being repeated?
Last year’s London Green Lifestyle Show was one of a number of events held in London Sustainability Weeks 2005. The Show was successful but did not attract private sector sponsorship, which makes it difficult to sustain. My officers are currently considering other ways to promote the green lifestyle message this year, including supporting some of the many similar local events. Knee Hill Question No: 30 / 2006 Darren Johnson Are you concerned that the extra traffic generated by the proposed Thames Gateway Bridge is going to cause irrevocable environmental damage to the ancient woodlands bordering Knee Hill? Will you give a personal commitment that Transport for London will not fund any proposal to increase capacity at Knee Hill, as this will increase demand for vehicles wanting to travel between the proposed Thames Gateway Bridge and the A2 through what is a residential area?
The Environmental Statement (ES), submitted with the Thames Gateway Bridge (TGB) planning application, demonstrates no worsening of air quality or increase in noise at Lesnes Abbey Woods, Bostall Woods and Bostall Heath due to TGB.
The widening of Knee Hill is not part of TfL’s proposal for the TGB. The recently updated traffic modelling and revised tolling proposals show that junctions on Knee Hill would operate acceptably with TGB. Winter Warmth Campaign Question No: 31 / 2006 Darren Johnson How much, on average, would a pensioner be expected to pay towards central heating or insulation after all relevant grants have been taken into account? What assistance is provided to older people in applying for grants or dealing with the practicalities of having work done to their homes (e.g. the need to clear lofts before insulation is installed)?
All pensioners over 70 are entitled to free loft and cavity wall insulation under the Heatstreets scheme. Pensioners on pension credit can also get free insulation from utility suppliers. Remaining pensioners would have to contribute from £75, depending on circumstances.
The Warm Front scheme installs up to £2700 of heating measures (gas) for pensioners. Some boroughs run their own schemes that are more generous.
All Londoners can get free and impartial help applying for schemes and grants from their local energy Efficiency Advice Centre.
Grant schemes are unlikely to clear lofts. Aldwych Gyratory Question No: 32 / 2006 Jenny Jones Aldwych gyratory is extremely unpleasant for cyclists and pedestrians to cross. In addition it lacks any bus priority measures. Will TfL fund a study and scheme to improve Aldwych for pedestrians, cyclists and buses?
The Aldwych Gyratory comprises roads that are in their entirety the responsibility of Westminster City Council. Through the London Bus Priority Network (LBPN), TfL funded in 2003/4 a study of the scope for improvements in the operation of the gyratory. Proposals included provision of a contra-flow bus lane and improvements in streetscape and pedestrian facilities. Opportunities for improvements for cyclists are being addressed in the on-going development of the scheme. The Council has yet to submit a bid for BSP funding but is understood to be developing a business case for a scheme. TfL will consider the scheme on its merit in the context of competing demands for available funds. Cross River Tram Question No: 33 / 2006 Jenny Jones What consideration has been given to the Cross River Tram re-using the old tram tunnels at Aldwych?
London Transport Planning did carry out some initial investigations into the idea in the mid 1990s but found the Kingsway tram tunnel to be technically unsuitable for modern light rail vehicles. TfL is promoting an accessible transport scheme and sees no obvious benefit in moving a surface transport scheme underground for a few hundred metres where people can neither see it nor access it easily. Helicopter Pollution Question No: 34 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross How many advertising helicopter flights are taking place in London in a typical month? Will you make representations to the CAA to have them banned?
The Civil Aviation Authority does not keep figures on the number of advertising helicopter flights. There is currently one operator authorised, on safety grounds, to carry a large advertising banner. As I have said (MQ1142/2005), I think that helicopter flights solely for advertising should need special permission, with full account taken of environmental impacts. New powers, or a reinterpretation of current understanding of the law, would be needed. I will make representations to the Government to look at the legal position, including the feasibility of an outright ban. Drug Dealing Question No: 35 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross What progress are the police making in tackling drug dealing in Lambeth?
I have been informed that the MPS in Lambeth are running an operation entitled ‘No Deal’ which targets drug dealing in and around Brixton Town Centre. ‘No Deal’ is a direct response to local community demands to address drug dealing and associated street crime as well as anti social behavior. The MPS will introduce a positive arrest policy for drug possession, including cannabis, in the Town Centre area. Officers will use charges, cautions, warnings or no further action. Lambeth Council and the CPS support this activity. A public meeting was held at Lambeth Town Hall recently, which gave overwhelming support for this planned activity. Inspector Sean Martell will run the operation. Further information can be obtained from Supt Stuart Low. ‘No Deal’ is ongoing and has been running since 12th December 2005. The most recent figures are as follows: 306 Stop and Searches 172 Stop and Accounts 104 Arrests of which, 49 have been for Possession Class A/ Class C. The MPS are continuing with crack house raids and closures outside of ‘No Deal’ and have to date conducted 78 Crack raids in the Borough. Percentage Increases in Tube Fares Question No: 36 / 2006 John Biggs What are the percentage increases in child weekly, monthly and annual tube season tickets for zones 1-2, Zones 1-3, zones 1-4, zones 1-5 and zones 1-6 and can you justify this?
The Table below shows child weekly Travelcard prices in 2005; child weekly prices in 2006; the cost of 10 child Oyster fares in 2006; and the percentage increases in each case.
The percentage increases for monthly tickets are as for weeklies. There are no annual child tickets.
From this January, child fares on the Tube have generally moved to a consistent, half fare basis.
With the introduction of child Oyster fares on the Tube at half the adult rate, the cost of travel to school by the Tube should go down in most cases – as column (6) below shows.
Weekly Travelcard Child Oyster fares Percentage changes 2005 2006 One Ten (2) vs (1) (4) vs (1) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) £ £ p £ Zone 1 7.30 11.10 70 7.00 +52 -4 Zone 1-2 8.60 11.10 100 10.00 +29 +16 Zone 1-3 11.50 13.00 100 10.00 +13 -13 Zone 1-4 14.20 15.80 100 10.00 +11 -30 Zone 1-5 15.70 18.90 100 10.00 +20 -36 Zone 1-6 17.20 20.50 100 10.00 +19 -42 Zone 2-3 6.50 7.00 50 5.00 +8 -23 Zone 2-4 8.80 9.20 90 9.00 +5 +2 Zone 2-5 11.00 11.10 90 9.00 +1 -18 Zone 2-6 12.60 13.60 90 9.00 +8 -29
Range of Travel Tickets Question No: 37 / 2006 John Biggs Do you understand that many Londoners are still confused by the range of travel tickets available in London?
The bus fare structure is now very simple. I agree that further simplifying travel tickets for the Tube and the trains would have benefits.
Emerging sales trends since the January fare changes indicate that more and more users are getting the Oyster message and achieving better value as a result.
The continuing refusal of the Train Operators to accept Oyster is adding an unnecessary and unjustified layer of confusion to the ticketing system. I would urge all Londoners to join with me in making it clear to the Train Operators that this is totally unacceptable. Additional Bus Service Question No: 38 / 2006 John Biggs Do you accept that many of my constituents in Tower Hamlets and Newham would like to see a local bus service running alongside the trunk 25 route between Aldgate and Stratford? What prospect is there of such a service being introduced?
TfL is aware of this proposal and has reviewed it. TfL found that because running an extra route between Aldgate and Stratford would not create any new links on the network it created very little benefit for the substantial cost of providing a parallel service. TfL believes that overall, route 25 provides sufficient capacity for the existing demand, but is investigating complaints regarding crowding on the route 25 after the evening peak period. HM Customs Question No: 39 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross I understand that HM Revenue and Customs is a law enforcement agency, but that despite this, vehicles carrying out enforcement actions are subject to the congestion charge? Has this situation been reviewed and are you content that it is reasonable to charge such civil service vehicles?
HM Customs vehicles, like all Governmental vehicles, are subject to the Congestion Charge. There is an exemption for emergency service vehicles based on DVLA tax categories, however, HM Customs vehicles do not fall into this category.
Due to the covert nature of many of their vehicles, HM Customs chose to pay the charge anonymously rather than have a fleet account. Therefore, they are unable to take advantage of the discounted fleet rate.
Like all aspects of the Congestion Charge, discounts and exemptions are kept under constant review, and I will ask TfL to look into this specific issue. Southwark Disablement Association Question No: 40 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross Patrick Horan of the Southwark Disablement Association has asked me to ask you the following question on his behalf: “TfL gives a fantastic statistic of buses leaving the garage with a malfunctioning ramp but this is not true, I have had to wait in the rain and cold up to 90 mins for a functioning ramp bus to come along, the buses in question are the 381 and 1, but I understand this is a prevalent problem across the network, I am deeply embarrassed as I campaigned vigorously against the ¿save the Routemaster Campaign¿ and for disabled users to use mainstream buses instead of door 2 door transport. Mr Mayor, when are we going to get a ramp that functions 100% of the time or at least 90%”
Mr Horan’s support for our efforts to ensure that all London buses are low-floor and wheelchair accessible is much appreciated. I am pleased that this was achieved on time at the end of 2005. I recognise there are instances where ramps have failed, causing considerable inconvenience to the passengers concerned.
The performance of ramps has significantly improved over the past few years, for example a recent audit of wheelchair ramps showed that out of 2,131 buses checked, only 34 had faulty ramps. London Buses has instructed operators that no buses will leave their garage with a defective ramp. However, instances do occur when a ramp fails while in service and this is regrettable. Ramp manufacturers and operators are trying to minimise this situation.
London Buses has been in touch with Patrick Horan to apologise for his experiences when using buses and has offered to spend an afternoon travelling around with him to understand his problems. Pedestrian Crossing Facilities - Thurlow Park Road Question No: 41 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross Parents have been contacting me regarding the lack of a pelican crossing on the A205 at the junction of Elmcourt and Lovelace Rd. There is obviously real fear amongst parents regarding the safety of their children crossing the zebra to get to school. When will TfL upgrade this crossing to make it safer?
I am aware of local concerns over road safety on the A205, Thurlow Park Road at the zebra crossing located close to Elmcourt Road and Lovelace Road. In my response to Roger Evans (2421/2005) on this subject, I said that interrogation of TfL’s records shows that at the junction of Thurlow Park Road/Lovelace Road there were no pedestrian casualties on the crossing up to the end of the most recent, three year reporting period. It is, however, acknowledged that there has been a more recent pedestrian casualty.
TfL, together with its borough partners, has an impressive record of reducing road casualties and will continue to prioritise activities to maximise their effectiveness in casualty reduction.
Given the low accident record, conversion of the zebra crossing to a pelican would not suggest a potential for casualty reduction. However, such conversions can be considered also if there is a need to create a better balance between pedestrian and vehicular movement, or to provide a sense of greater security for those wishing to cross. Grounds for providing or upgrading controlled crossings also include community severance. I have asked TfL to ensure that these factors, and particularly the presence of schools, are considered in relation to the crossings on Thurlow Park Road, and that any upgrading of the crossing be appropriately programmed in relation to competing priorities on its constrained resources.
TfL advise me that resources to undertake formal assessments have since been allocated, with a view to completing the assessments during the Spring. Pedestrian Crossing in West Norwood Question No: 42 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross I have been in correspondence with TfL about the need for a pedestrian crossing across Norwood Rd (at the York Hill/ Lancaster Ave junction). However as this is a Lambeth Council Rd TfL were unable to act without an approach from Lambeth. Lambeth requested assistance in April and have had their first proposal turned down because it would slow down the movement of buses along the busy bus lane. What assistance can TfL render to Lambeth to ensure that there is both a safe pedestrian crossing at this point - and that buses will not be slowed?
TfL reviewed LB Lambeth’s proposals for Norwood Road in the context of the Traffic Management Act 2004, which places a requirement on all highway authorities to ‘keep traffic moving’. The review showed that it was not possible to provide the pedestrian facility without imposing significant delay, particularly on bus passengers.
Following this review, TfL worked closely with Lambeth to develop a scheme that would provide the crossing without undue negative impacts for other road users. Lambeth developed and submitted a proposal that included a northbound bus lane that would mitigate the effects of the crossing. TfL agreed in principle to providing funding to allow the bus lane to be introduced. Sadly, Lambeth members resolved ‘to refuse to endorse’ the proposal developed by Lambeth officers.
Lambeth has very recently submitted a new proposal which TfL will review. Cross River Tram Question No: 43 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross I am pleased to see the CRT in the TfL five year business plan. When will likely affected local businesses and churches and others in Peckham be contacted regarding the possible relocation issues.
The route for CRT through Peckham has not yet been determined, however,. options are currently being identified for detailed consideration. Formal consultation on route options will be undertaken in the autumn this year to allow a single alignment to be selected and safeguarded by the boroughs.
The Southwark Unitary Development Plan incorporates a proposed site for a tram depot in Peckham and I am aware of the sensitivities of this site. This proposal was the subject of a public inquiry which finished in July 2005 and the Inspector's report into the inquiry is due shortly. The siting of the depot will depend on the approved version of the Southwark UDP and public consultation on the site proposals. Notwithstanding this, where properties might be affected by any proposed depot site, TfL will work with the borough to listen to views of local people who live or work nearby. TfL is currently seeking to identify potentially affected properties in this area so this engagement can take place.
CRT will play a crucial role in supporting regeneration in both Lambeth and Southwark, particularly in areas such as Peckham which are not well served by public transport. Croydon Tramlink Question No: 44 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross I am delighted to see the commitment to pursue the extension of the Croydon Tramlink to Crystal Palace station and park. However, the proposed branch to Streatham is given scant mention. What is the realistic prospect of progress on an A23 arm of Croydon tramlink, and when will this proposal come back on TfL’s agenda?
Given the need to prioritise use of its resources, TfL is not able to actively develop the Streatham extension at the present time. However, this extension will be kept under review. Should further funding become available we would be keen to develop it further. Bullsmoor Lane Bus Lane Question No: 45 / 2006 Joanne McCartney Works to the Holmesdale Tunnel on the M25 is likely to cause major traffic disruption to residents in Enfield. Will TfL be willing to suspend the operation of the bus lane in Bullsmoor Lane in order to assist traffic flow?
Transport for London and Enfield Council are working together with the Highways Agency to understand the likely impacts of the works to the Holmesdale Tunnel and to consider appropriate mitigation measures.
Bullsmoor Lane is the responsibility of Enfield Council as highway authority and any decision to suspend the bus lane would be theirs, but since it is immediately adjacent to the Transport for London Road Network and the Strategic Road Network, TfL would have to approve any such proposal. TfL will look carefully at the relative merits of any proposal Enfield might put forward and work with the Council towards an optimal outcome.
In principle, I have to say it would be a disappointment to suspend a bus lane in the face of increasing congestion as it is at such times that bus priority is most needed. Buses are a particularly efficient mode and, unlike the private motorist, bus drivers cannot alter their routes when they encounter traffic queues. Congestion affects bus performance and reliability for passengers throughout the route. Archway Road Fencing Question No: 46 / 2006 Joanne McCartney What is the current situation with regards to your review of the fence along the Archway Road, outside Highgate tube station in Haringey?
The review of the fence has been completed as stated in response to MQT 1784/2005 in September 2005.
On the basis of a review of all the evidence provided, I consider that in the short to medium term the benefits of retaining the fence in terms of noise reduction outweigh the disbenefits. However, London Underground are working towards finding the best solution for the longer term. Safer Neighbourhood Teams in Enfield Question No: 47 / 2006 Joanne McCartney When can every neighbourhood in Enfield expect to have a safer neighbourhood team?
As I announced on January 10 2006, all remaining wards in London will receive their Safer Neighbourhoods (SN) team by the end April 2006 - a full two years ahead of schedule.
All of London's 625 neighbourhoods will have live SN teams by 3 April 2006, subject to the budget confirmation in mid-February. All new teams will comprise four officers in the first instance, rising to the full component of 6 PCSOs/police officers by the end of March 2007. Safer Neighbourhood Teams in Haringey Question No: 48 / 2006 Joanne McCartney When can every neighbourhood in Haringey expect to have a safer neighbourhood team? As I announced on January 10 2006, all remaining wards in London will receive their Safer Neighbourhoods (SN) team by the end April 2006 - a full two years ahead of schedule.
All of London's 625 neighbourhoods will have live SN teams by 3 April 2006, subject to the budget confirmation in mid-February. All new teams will comprise four officers in the first instance, rising to the full component of 6 PCSOs/police officers by the end of March 2007. Free Bus Travel in Tower Hamlets Question No: 49 / 2006 John Biggs What percentage of 11-15 year olds have applied for free bus travel in Tower Hamlets and are you satisfied that enough has been done to ensure that uptake is on par with the London average? If not, what further steps are going to be taken?
Only 14 and 15 year olds need a Child Oyster photocard to get free bus travel. However, younger children do need to apply if they wish to use Oyster pay as you go fares on the Tube or buy a Travelcard season.
TfL has now issued nearly 150,000 cards to 14 and 15 year olds – a take up rate of more than 80% across the whole of London. Over 80,000 cards have been issued to younger children.
A market research omnibus survey carried out in December indicated that:
• Over 95% of parents are aware of the free travel concession;
• Take up shows no variation by social class or ethnicity.
Taking the wider 11-15 year old age group as a whole, take up in Tower Hamlets at end 2005 was 35% compared with the 51% for London as a whole.
The main factor affecting take up seems to have been the willingness of local schools to get involved in the scheme and distribute leaflets and application forms to pupils.
In Tower Hamlets only 10 schools out of 17 participated initially, compared to an overall rate of over 80%. TfL is now working with the Schools’ Co-ordinator in Tower Hamlets, to improve awareness of the scheme amongst parents.
Feedback from this initiative and the results of other recent TfL research will determine what further steps are taken in other areas where take up has been comparatively low. Free Bus Travel in Barking and Dagenham Question No: 50 / 2006 John Biggs What percentage of 11-15 year olds have applied for free bus travel in Barking and Dagenham and are you satisfied that enough has been done to ensure that uptake is on par with the London average? If not, what further steps are going to be taken?
Please refer to my answer to 49/2006. Free Bus Travel in Newham Question No: 51 / 2006 John Biggs What percentage of 11-15 year olds have applied for free bus travel in Newham and are you satisfied that enough has been done to ensure that uptake is on par with the London average? If not, what further steps are going to be taken?
Please refer to my answer to 49/2006. Body Scanners on the Tube Network Question No: 52 / 2006 John Biggs Have clear guidelines been established for the use of body scanners on the tube network? Under whose jurisdiction will this be?
The Secretary of State has announced an intention to test security equipment within the rail environment to assist with evaluating whether, and how, it might play a role in the future.
A trial is already underway on the Heathrow Express system at Paddington under the jurisdiction of the Department for Transport. However, before any trials commence on LU, clear guidelines for use will be agreed. Oyster Integration Target Question No: 53 / 2006 John Biggs What are your targets for TOC Oyster integration during 2006-7?
Assuming TfL assumes control of the Silverlink Metro service, I would expect Oyster Pay As You Go to be accepted on these services in 2007. During 2006-7 I expect all other train operators to accept that their customers want full access to Oyster, including Pay As You Go, and to place orders for equipment that allow this to take place. I also expect one or more train operators to begin trialling Oyster Pay As You Go on routes involving gated stations that already have Oyster readers. It would also be welcome if train operators took steps to install Oyster retail facilities at all rail stations in Greater London. I wish to make clear that I have no intention to pay train operators to do this as it is in their financial interest to adopt Oyster. TfL has already spent millions of pounds providing train operators with card readers at gates, hand-held card readers for train crews and revenue protection staff, Oyster retailing devices that integrate with national rail ticket machines and training and consulting services. TfL continues to share its smart card ticketing expertise freely with the train operators. In 2004 TfL offered to finance the £25 million investment required to allow Oyster to be accepted by the end of 2006 at all rail stations in Greater London. TfL was willing to accept re-payment over five years. The train operators refused and instead are seeking a grant of £60 million or more for a smart card-based system that would solve revenue control problems that have been tolerated for decades. In other words, even though train operators have taken little or no action to tackle fare evasion or provide customers with up-to-date ticketing systems, they hope to pay nothing for systems that will bestow significant financial rewards. Extension of Barking - Gospel Oak Line Question No: 54 / 2006 John Biggs Would you support the idea of extending Barking-Gospel Oak trains to Rainham?
As part of the development of its longer-term strategy for London’s National Rail network, TfL has been undertaking a series of studies into future options for a number of routes. These studies include the Gospel Oak to Barking service and its possible extension to Rainham or Grays. I support the idea of service enhancements to meet demand but more work will need to be done on this proposal before any commitment can be given to the development of such services. Wind Turbines Question No: 55 / 2006 John Biggs Which areas of London are appropriate locations for free-standing wind turbines?
The London Energy Partnership, which we set up to bring together a range of sectors and organisations across London to deliver energy action effectively, has been working on a Wind and Biomass Study.
The study investigates the potential for non-building integrated wind and biomass plants in London, and identifies sites that are suitable for wind turbines. It will produce illustrated GIS maps and a set of guidelines detailing what renders a site suitable for installing a wind turbine in London.
The study will be made public later this quarter on the LEP website, at http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/environment/energy/partnership-steering-group/action.jsp Energy Supplies for London Question No: 56 / 2006 John Biggs Given the recent scare over Russian gas supplies what role does your office play in ensuring secure energy supplies for London?
UK gas supplies were not affected by the recent problems of supply capacity to Europe from Russia.
However, my Energy Strategy recognises the link between addressing climate change and improving security of supply. Maximising energy efficiency and increasing the amount of local, decentralised generation from renewable sources and CHP, reduces carbon emissions as well as improves security of supply.
I am implementing this via my Planning Decisions Unit, the London Energy Partnership, London Hydrogen Partnership, London Climate Change Agency and the Functional Bodies. Support for the Co-op and Social Enterprises Question No: 57 / 2006 John Biggs What support has the wider GLA given to a. Co-ops and b. Social enterprises in the past five years?
My Economic Development Strategy (EDS) recognises that the Third Sector (including social enterprises and co-operatives) is an important sector of the economy, as an employer and as a partner in delivering the EDS. Over the past five years the London Development Agency (LDA) has delivered substantial support to the Third Sector through funding the London Social Economy Task Force; pan-London business support via Social Enterprise London; dedicated support for enterprises in Objective 2 areas and a major loans scheme for social enterprises. The LDA is also working closely with social enterprise support organisations in taking forward its plans for the future of business support. The Big Brother House and George Galloway Question No: 58 / 2006 John Biggs Would you enter the Big Brother House? Do you agree that George Galloway’s incarceration in the house has fulfilled a useful role for his constituents and if so what was it?
No and No. Bird Flu Question No: 59 / 2006 John Biggs How well prepared is London now for any incidence of bird flu? Do plans need to be revisited in the light of recent developments?
Defra has reviewed its overall risk assessment of the threat posed by highly pathogenic Avian Influenza. In light of the recent cases in China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Croatia and Romania it concludes that there is a high risk of further global dispersion. It assesses the risk to the UK as increased but still low . The GLA is continuing to work with London Resilience to monitor, assess and respond to the risks posed by current outbreaks in the Far East and elsewhere.
To address the risk of the bird flu virus mutating into a form that would result in human-to-human transmission I provided an update to the Assembly on the status of the GLA group pandemic flu response plan on 14 December. The plan is now in the process of being submitted to the functional bodies and MPS for formal ratification. We will provide a copy of the plan to BMAC for noting
The plan complements the business continuity plans - in place in the GLA, the MPS and each of the FBs - that detail how essential services will be maintained in the event of a pandemic.
Loud Music Using Mobile Phones on Buses Question No: 60 / 2006 Valerie Shawcross Are there any measures in place to limit the use of people playing loud music using mobile phones on buses? London Buses have issued a standard reply stating that they do not prohibit people from using mobile phones on buses. However this is a growing antisocial behaviour problem which some of my constituents find extremely unpleasant when using public transport.
TfL has run marketing campaigns in the past to encourage passengers to consider the wishes of others when travelling. If a member of the public is unresponsive and continues to disturb others it is difficult for TfL to do more. It is hard to see how TfL could introduce and effectively enforce a ban on people using mobile phones on buses given current social trends.
That said, TfL has just launched a radio and poster campaign aimed at under-16s anti-social behaviour. The campaign will remind children of the need to behave responsibly whilst using the bus network, respecting other passengers; otherwise their concession will be removed. Olympics Parking Question No: 61 / 2006 Darren Johnson You commented to the Assembly meeting on 16 November 2005 that you would look at scaling down Olympics car and coach parking in order to find alternatives to building on Hackney Marshes and Fish Island. What progress have you achieved?
The design team, working with David Higgins, the interim Olympic Delivery Authority’s chief executive designate, are still working on these issues as part of a wider process of reviewing the Olympic Park plans. Budget Consultation Question No: 62 / 2006 Sally Hamwee Given your comments (on 15th December 2005) that you would not have produced a Consultation Budget unless you were legally required to do so and your view that the consultation paper was “virtually meaningless” ¿ how can Londoners have a meaningful input into the budget process?
My comments were about the convoluted nature of the statutory budget process and its timing. The very size of London makes it difficult to engage Londoners directly in the budget process, but as I have said before I do of course listen to Londoners' views throughout the year, whether it is through opinion surveys such as the Annual London Survey or through the meetings and events I host in City Hall and elsewhere. A good example is the feedback from the Annual London Survey on neighbourhood policing. The views of any individuals responding to the budget consultation are also considered. Capping Question No: 63 / 2006 Graham Tope What discussions have you had with government about the capping limit for the GLA Group? Have you been told to work on the basis of a 5.5% increase limit for the GLA?
I have had no discussions about the capping limit as the government does not set its capping criteria until after budgets have been set. However, I have received two letters from the Minister for Local Government about council tax next year and I will send you copies if desired. Resilience Question No: 64 / 2006 Mike Tuffrey Further to my question 2132 in December, central government has not agreed to fund the costs of extra resilience capacity for the Fire Service (six fire rescue units) judged essential for the capital city’s safety. What are you doing to ensure that this clear national responsibility does not yet again fall to Londoners to fund?
I am committed to fund the enhanced resilience for the Fire Service because I believe strongly, on the advice of the Fire Commissioner, that this investment is needed to respond to incidents such as 7 July last year in London. I am of course disappointed that the government has yet to be persuaded to contribute from national taxation, but will continue to make the case for additional funding. I understand that postponement of half the transitional relief repayment next year was as a result of the direct intervention linking these two issues, for which the Chair of the Authority and I have lobbied. Staff - City Hall Question No: 65 / 2006 Mike Tuffrey Please give figures for the number of staff employed by the GLA (Core) for each year since 2000 - broken down by Department.
Directorate September September September September September September 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Chief Executive - 4 32 51 51 3 Communications 19 47.9 - - - - Corporate 56 69 140 172 174 173 Services Finance and - 55 64 69 70 73 Performance Mayor’s Office 26 29 71 84 89 117 Media and - - - - - 57 Marketing Performance 9 - - - - - and Partnerships Policy and - 117.4 102 122 125 131 Partnerships Secretariat 12 71.4 85 93 93 90 Strategy 61 - - - - - Total 183 393.7 494 591 602 644 Consultants Question No: 66 / 2006 Geoff Pope What are the projected costs of consultants in 2006/07 for each of the Functional Bodies? What are latest projected (end of year) costs for each Functional Body in 2005/06?
MPA The current forecast for the MPA only for 2005-06 is £148k. Budget for 2006-07 is £150k.
LFEPA LFEPA’s projected spend is £3.8m in 2005-06 and the proposed budget is £3.2m for 2006-07. The category of spend is “professional services” and includes areas of spend which can be classified as consultants, or could be classified differently such as outsourced work (e.g. IT projects, scientific services, insurance brokers, computer audit), interim managers, external legal and medical advisers, and building works consultants. These figures may not therefore be directly comparable with those from other functional bodies unless these have also been produced on that basis.
TfL The projected cost of consultants in 2006-07 for TfL is £116m. The forecast (end of year) costs of consultants in 2005-06 are expected to be £117m which is slightly above budget.
LDA Consultancy figures for 2006-7 are subject to the London Development Agency’s (LDA) corporate planning processes. Consultancy costs for 2005-06 year to-date are £5.7m. Projected consultancy costs to the financial year-end are subject to the appraisal and approval of planned projects for the rest of 2005-06 which has a consultancy component. The LDA has efficiency targets, one of which is to monitor and control the usage of consultants within the LDA.
Budget Setting Question No: 67 / 2006 Graham Tope Will you provide details of your meeting with Jenny Jones and Darren Johnson AMs on 10 January 2006 and in particular, detail any agreements made between yourself and the Green Group?
I attach a copy of my letter (as Appendix B) to Darren and Jenny which sets out what was agreed at that meeting. The Londoner Newspaper Question No: 68 / 2006 Mike Tuffrey What financial commitments have each of the functional bodies made to fund The Londoner newspaper in 2006/07 (please include each amount)?
The LDA has agreed to provide £500,000 of funding for The Londoner in 2006/07. Agreements have not yet been made with other funding partners. Transport Commissioner Question No: 69 / 2006 Geoff Pope Why do we need another Transport Commissioner?
To continue to deliver the significant improvements in London’s transport system. TfL Income Question No: 70 / 2006 Geoff Pope Please provide a breakdown of TfL’s latest income projections for 2005/06 (end of year) broken down by fare (each mode) and other income.
The breakdown of TfL’s latest income projection for 2005/06 can be found in the Table below.
Mode Full Year forecast (Q3) 2005/06 (£m) Underground Income from fares 1,285 Bus Income from fares 941 Congestion Charging Income 229 PCO, VCS Licence fees 35 DLR income from fares 44 Other TfL Income 277 Total 2,811 TfL Income Question No: 71 / 2006 Geoff Pope Please provide a breakdown of TfL’s latest projections for income in 2006/07 broken down by fare (each mode) and other income.
The breakdown of TfL’s latest income projection for 2006/07 can be found in the Table below.
Mode Projected 2006/07 (£m) Underground Income from fares 1,340 Bus Income from fares 1,004 Congestion Charging Income 219 PCO, VCS Licence fees 37 DLR income from fares 59 Other TfL Income 287 Total 2,946 Bus Fare Income Question No: 72 / 2006 Geoff Pope How much revenue income will ‘off peak’ cash fare income generate in 2006/07 (TfL projection)?
Bus cash fare income is expected to be around £150m in 2006/07. About three quarters of cash fares revenue arises from travel outside the peaks defined as weekdays 07:00-09:30 and 16:00- 19:00. Cash Payment on Buses Question No: 73 / 2006 Geoff Pope What percentage of buses users currently pay by cash? What is TfL’s current thinking about when buses will be cashless?
In the four week period to 10 December 2005, 7.7% of passengers paid cash on the bus, down from 10.2% in the four week period leading up to 17 September 2005.
Early evidence suggests a further decline in cash payments following the January 2006 fares change. There are several benefits in passengers paying for their bus travel in advance, including: