DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Resources Assessment for the Ione Sands Moto-X Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Resources Assessment for the Ione Sands Moto-X Project Biological Resources Assessment for the Ione Sands Moto-X Project Amador County, California Prepared For: US Mine Corporation July 24, 2017 Biological Assessment for Ione Sands Moto-X CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 FEDERAL REGULATIONS .............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Federal Endangered Species Act .................................................................................. 3 2.2 Critical Habitat ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ............................................................................................. 4 2.4 Federal Clean Water Act .............................................................................................. 4 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Site Reconnaissance ............................................................................................................. 5 3.3 Special-Status Species Considered for the Project ................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Site Characteristics and Land Use ........................................................................................ 11 4.2 Vegetation Communities ..................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Soils .................................................................................................................................. 12 4.3.1 Sedimentary Rock Land (Sa) ...................................................................................... 12 4.3.1 Mokelumne soils and Alluvial Land (Mt) ...................................................................... 12 4.4 Potential Waters of the U.S. ................................................................................................ 15 4.4.1 Drainage Ditch .......................................................................................................... 15 4.4.2 Seasonal Wetland ..................................................................................................... 15 4.4.3 Pond ........................................................................................................................ 15 4.5 Wildlife .............................................................................................................................. 15 4.6 Evaluation of Species Identified in the Literature Search ....................................................... 16 4.6.1 Plants ....................................................................................................................... 19 4.6.2 Invertebrates ............................................................................................................ 19 4.6.3 Fish .......................................................................................................................... 20 4.6.4 Amphibians ............................................................................................................... 20 4.6.5 Reptiles .................................................................................................................... 21 4.6.6 Birds ........................................................................................................................ 21 4.6.7 Mammals .................................................................................................................. 21 4.6.8 Wildlife Movement/Corridors ...................................................................................... 21 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................. 22 5.1 Waters of the U.S. .............................................................................................................. 22 5.2 Special-Status Plants ........................................................................................................... 22 5.3 Special-Status Invertebrates ................................................................................................ 22 EcoUrban Designs, Inc. i July 24, 2017 5.4 Special-Status Fish .............................................................................................................. 23 5.5 Special-Status Amphibians .................................................................................................. 23 5.6 Special-Status Reptiles ........................................................................................................ 23 5.7 Special-Status Birds and MBTA Protected Birds (including Raptors) ........................................ 23 5.8 Special-Status Mammals...................................................................................................... 24 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 24 7.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 26 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Species Identified During the Literature Search ........................................................................ 6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity .................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Project Location .................................................................................................................. 13 Figure 3. Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Types ............................................................... 14 Figure 4. Preliminary Wetland Assessment .......................................................................................... 17 Figure 5. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Occurrences of Federally Listed Species .......... 18 July 24, 2017 ii EcoUrban Designs, Inc. Biological Resources Assessment for Ione Sands Moto-X 1.0 INTRODUCTION At the request of US Mine Corporation, EcoUrban Designs, Inc. has conducted a biological resources assessment for the proposed Ione Sands moto-X (Project) located in Amador County, California. The purpose of the assessment was to collect information on the biological resources present within the Project area, and to determine any potential biological constraints to Project activities. 1.1 Project Location The ±162-acre Project site is located on Highway 124 located south of the City of Ione. The Project site corresponds to a portion of unsectioned land, Township 6 North, and Range 9 East (MDBM) of the Ione, California” 7.5-minute quadrangle (U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey [USGS] 1962)(Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity). The approximate center of the Project site is located at 38° 19' 42.0276'' North and 120° 56' 22.5888'' West within the Upper Mokelumne Watershed (18040012, USGS 2015). 1.2 Methods Prior to the field surveys, California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB, 2017) was searched. Since the site is in the central part of the USGS 7.5 minute Ione topographic quadrangle, the CNDDB search encompassed this quadrangle. This CNDDB search is approximately 120 miles surrounding the site. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of Federally Threatened and Endangered species that may occur in or be affected by projects in the Ione topographic quadrangles (attached) was also reviewed. The purpose of this biological resource assessment (BRA) is to assess the potential for occurrence of special-status plant and animal species or their habitat, sensitive habitats such as wetlands within the Project site. Field surveys were conducted on April 29, 2017. The surveys consisted of driving and walking throughout the site, making observations and noting habitat conditions, surrounding land uses, and plant and wildlife species. We conducted a search for jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (a term that includes wetlands) as defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE, 1987; 2017), sensitive species and suitable habitat for sensitive species (e.g., elderberry shrubs, vernal pools). The BRA is prepared to support The Environmental Assessment pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and to support the USFWS consultation. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this BRA are based upon a review of the referenced documents and site reconnaissance. For this assessment, special-status species are defined as the following: are listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for future listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA); or are
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North
    Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Prepared by: Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. 6355 Riverside Blvd., Suite C Sacramento, CA 95831-1143 Phone: 916/ 427-0703 Fax: 916/ 427-2175 Contact: R. John Little, Ph.D. Prepared for: Thomas Martin & Associates 120 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 4 Folsom, CA 95630 Phone: 916/ 985-6380 Contact: Mr. Thomas Martin 8 September 2006 Biological Resources Evaluation Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Biological Resources Evaluation Report For Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Table of Contents I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS..................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. Purpose of Report ......................................................................................................................1 B. Project Location.........................................................................................................................1 C. Project Applicant .......................................................................................................................1 D. Project Description ....................................................................................................................1 III. STUDY METHODS.......................................................................................................................5 A. Studies Conducted .....................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids
    4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Qiao Wang Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 133 4.2 Phenology of Adults ..................................................................................................................... 134 4.3 Diet of Adults ............................................................................................................................... 138 4.4 Location of Host Plants and Mates .............................................................................................. 138 4.5 Recognition of Mates ................................................................................................................... 140 4.6 Copulation .................................................................................................................................... 141 4.7 Larval Host Plants, Oviposition Behavior, and Larval Development .......................................... 142 4.8 Mating Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 144 4.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 148 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Biological Resources
    4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES DRAFT EIR PINE ACRES NORTH NOVEMBER 2009 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION The Biological Resources chapter of the EIR evaluates the biological resources known to occur or potentially occur within the Pine Acres North project (proposed project) site. This chapter describes potential impacts to those resources, and identifies measures to eliminate or substantially reduce those impacts to less-than-significant levels. Existing plant communities, wetlands, wildlife habitats, and potential for special-status species and communities are discussed for the project site. The information contained in this analysis is primarily based on a Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North1 prepared by Sycamore Environmental Consultants (See Appendix G), a Jurisdictional Delineation and Special Status Species Evaluation2 prepared by Gibson & Skordal, LLC (See Appendix H), and an Oak Woodland Assessment3 prepared by Ronald P. Monk Consulting (See Appendix I). EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following sections describe the regional setting of the site, as well as the existing biological resources occurring in the proposed project area. Regional Setting The proposed project site is located in the Sierra Foothills in the western portion of Amador County, approximately one mile southeast of the community of Pine Grove. The proposed site ranges from approximately 2,500 feet to 2,690 feet above mean sea level (MSL) and is located in the Upper Mokelumne watershed. The majority of soils within the project site were formed in material weathered metasedimentary rock and are well drained with medium to very rapid runoff. Project Setting Land uses located within Amador County are primarily agricultural and open space, with residential and commercial areas in existing cities (See Figure 4.3-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Lynchi)
    Invertebrates Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi) Status State: Meets the requirements as a “rare, threatened, or endangered species” under CEQA Federal: Threatened Critical Habitat: Designated 2006 (USFWS 2006) Population Trend Global: Declining due to habitat loss and fragmentation (Eriksen and Belk 1999) State: As above Within Inventory Area: Unknown Data Characterization The location database for the vernal pool fairy shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi) within the inventory area includes 6 records from 1993, 1997, and 1999. The majority of locations are vernal pools within non-native grassland. Other natural and artificial habitats have a high probability of being occupied by additional populations of the vernal pool fairy shrimp throughout the grassland habitats within the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area. Beyond the original description (Eng et al. 1990), a scanning electron micrograph of the cyst (resting egg) (Hill and Shepard 1997), and some generalized natural history data (Helm 1997), no peer-reviewed technical literature has been published concerning the vernal pool fairy shrimp. Eriksen and Belk (1999) presented a brief discussion of the vernal pool fairy shrimp and provided a distribution map. Range The vernal pool fairy shrimp is found from Jackson County near Medford, Oregon, throughout the Central Valley, and west to the central Coast Ranges. Isolated southern populations occur on the Santa Rosa Plateau and near Rancho California in Riverside County (Eng et al.1990, Eriksen
    [Show full text]
  • Arctostaphylos Hispidula, Gasquet Manzanita
    Conservation Assessment for Gasquet Manzanita (Arctostaphylos hispidula) Within the State of Oregon Photo by Clint Emerson March 2010 U.S.D.A. Forest Service Region 6 and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Author CLINT EMERSON is a botanist, USDA Forest Service, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, Gold Beach and Powers Ranger District, Gold Beach, OR 97465 TABLE OF CONTENTS Disclaimer 3 Executive Summary 3 List of Tables and Figures 5 I. Introduction 6 A. Goal 6 B. Scope 6 C. Management Status 7 II. Classification and Description 8 A. Nomenclature and Taxonomy 8 B. Species Description 9 C. Regional Differences 9 D. Similar Species 10 III. Biology and Ecology 14 A. Life History and Reproductive Biology 14 B. Range, Distribution, and Abundance 16 C. Population Trends and Demography 19 D. Habitat 21 E. Ecological Considerations 25 IV. Conservation 26 A. Conservation Threats 26 B. Conservation Status 28 C. Known Management Approaches 32 D. Management Considerations 33 V. Research, Inventory, and Monitoring Opportunities 35 Definitions of Terms Used (Glossary) 39 Acknowledgements 41 References 42 Appendix A. Table of Known Sites in Oregon 45 2 Disclaimer This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile existing published and unpublished information for the rare vascular plant Gasquet manzanita (Arctostaphylos hispidula) as well as include observational field data gathered during the 2008 field season. This Assessment does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service (Region 6) or Oregon/Washington BLM. Although the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a California Tiger Salamander and California Fairy Shrimp Aquatic Sampling Survey Report
    Appendix A California Tiger Salamander and California Fairy Shrimp Aquatic Sampling Survey Report California Tiger Salamander and California Fairy Shrimp Aquatic Sampling Survey Report Prepared for: Shaw Environmental, Inc. Prepared By: Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. Contact: Josh Harwayne Senior Project Manager (831) 373-4341 September 2007 SUMMARY The Army is required to conduct wetland monitoring surveys in any areas where environmental cleanup activities could possibly impact protected wetland species on the Former Fort Ord U.S. Army base (Fort Ord), in Monterey County, California (Figure 1). This study provides faunal baseline data for Ranges where soil remediation is likely to be performed in the near future, and could possibly have biological impacts on protected wetland species or habitat. The monitoring study is consistent with the “Wetland Monitoring and Restoration Plan for Munitions and Contaminated Soil Remedial Activities at Former Fort Ord” (ACOE, 2006). Faunal baseline aquatic sampling studies were conducted by Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc. (DD&A) to determine the presence/absence of the federally Threatened California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense, CTS) and invertebrates, including the California fairy shrimp (Linderiella occidentalis), a federal species of special concern, at several locations within Fort Ord. Four study sites (Pools 8, 10, 21, and 30) and three control sites (Pools 5, 56, and 101 East) were identified for surveys (Figure 2). Due to the lack of sufficient ponding at three of the study pools during 2007, aquatic sampling occurred only at one of the study sites (Pool 10) and the three control sites. All four water bodies were sampled twice between January and March 2007 for invertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Assessment the Ranch ±530- Acre Study Area City of Rancho Cordova, California
    Biological Resources Assessment The Ranch ±530- Acre Study Area City of Rancho Cordova, California Prepared for: K. Hovnanian Homes October 13, 2017 Prepared by: © 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Regulatory Framework ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1. Federal Regulations .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1. Federal Endangered Species Act ............................................................................... 2 2.1.2. Migratory Bird Treaty Act ......................................................................................... 2 2.1.3. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ............................................................... 2 2.2. State Jurisdiction .............................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1. California Endangered Species Act ........................................................................... 3 2.2.2. California Department of Fish and Game Codes ...................................................... 3 2.2.3. Native Plant Protection Act .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Vegetation of Central Southwest Oregon, Based on GLO
    HISTORICAL VEGETATION OF CENTRAL SOUTHWEST OREGON, BASED ON GLO SURVEY NOTES Final Report to USDI BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Medford District October 31, 2011 By O. Eugene Hickman and John A. Christy Consulting Rangeland Ecologist Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Retired, USDA - NRCS Portland State University 61851 Dobbin Road PSU – INR, P.O. Box 751 Bend, Oregon 97702 Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 (541, 312-2512) (503, 725-9953) [email protected] [email protected] Suggested citation: Hickman, O. Eugene and John A. Christy. 2011. Historical Vegetation of Central Southwest Oregon Based on GLO Survey Notes. Final Report to USDI Bureau of Land Management. Medford District, Oregon. 124 pp. ______________________________________________________________________________ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 SW OREGON PRE-GLO SURVEY HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 7 THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE, ITS FUNCTION AND HISTORY...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arctostaphylos Photos Susan Mcdougall Arctostaphylos Andersonii
    Arctostaphylos photos Susan McDougall Arctostaphylos andersonii Santa Cruz Manzanita Arctostaphylos auriculata Mount Diablo Manzanita Arctostaphylos bakeri ssp. bakeri Baker's Manzanita Arctostaphylos bakeri ssp. sublaevis The Cedars Manzanita Arctostaphylos canescens ssp. canescens Hoary Manzanita Arctostaphylos canescens ssp. sonomensis Sonoma Canescent Manzanita Arctostaphylos catalinae Catalina Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos columbiana Columbia Manzanita Arctostaphylos confertiflora Santa Rosa Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. crinita Crinite Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. crustacea Brittleleaf Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. rosei Rose's Manzanita Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. subcordata Santa Cruz Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos cruzensis Arroyo De La Cruz Manzanita Arctostaphylos densiflora Vine Hill Manzanita Arctostaphylos edmundsii Little Sur Manzanita Arctostaphylos franciscana Franciscan Manzanita Arctostaphylos gabilanensis Gabilan Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. adamsii Adam's Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. crassifolia Del Mar Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. cushingiana Cushing's Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. glandulosa Eastwood Manzanita Arctostaphylos glauca Big berry Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ssp. hearstiorum Hearst's Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ssp. hookeri Hooker's Manzanita Arctostaphylos hooveri Hoover’s Manzanita Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. howellii Howell's Manzanita Arctostaphylos insularis Island Manzanita Arctostaphylos luciana
    [Show full text]
  • Conservancy Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Conservatio)
    2. CONSERVANCY FAIRY SHRIMP (BRANCHINECTA CONSERVATIO) a. Description and Taxonomy Taxonomy.—The Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta conservatio) was described by Eng, Belk, and Eriksen (Eng et al. 1990). The type specimens were collected in 1982 at Olcott Lake, Solano County, California. The species name was chosen to honor The Nature Conservancy, an organization responsible for protecting and managing a number of vernal pool ecosystems in California, including several that support populations of this species. Description and Identification.—Conservancy fairy shrimp look similar to other fairy shrimp species (Box 1- Appearance and Identification of Vernal Pool Crustaceans). Conservancy fairy shrimp are characterized by the distal segment of the male’s second antennae, which is about 30 percent shorter than the basal segment, and its tip is bent medially about 90 degrees (Eng et al. 1990). The female brood pouch is fusiform (tapered at each end), typically extends to abdominal segment eight, and has a terminal opening (Eng et al. 1990). Males may be from 14 to 27 millimeters (0.6 to 1.1 inch) in length, and females have been measured between 14.5 and 23 millimeters (0.6 and 0.9 inch) long. Conservancy fairy shrimp can be distinguished from the similar looking midvalley fairy shrimp (Branchinecta mesovallensis) by the shape of two humps on the distal segment of the male's second antennae (Belk and Fugate 2000). The midvalley fairy shrimp's antennae is bent such that the larger of the two humps is anterior (towards the head), whereas this same hump in the Conservancy fairy shrimp is posterior (towards the tail).
    [Show full text]
  • Ione Buckwheat), and Discussion of the Two Species Proposed RIN 1018±AE25 Eriogonum Apricum Var
    34190 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: nutrient-poor conditions of the soil Background which exclude other plant species; the Fish and Wildlife Service climate of the area may be moderated by Arctostaphylos myrtifolia (Ione its position due east of the Golden Gate 50 CFR Part 17 manzanita), Eriogonum apricum var. (Gankin and Major 1964, Roof 1982). apricum (Ione buckwheat), and Discussion of the Two Species Proposed RIN 1018±AE25 Eriogonum apricum var. prostratum (Irish Hill buckwheat) are found for Listing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife primarily in western Amador County, Parry (1887) described Arctostaphylos and Plants; Proposed Endangered about 70 kilometers (km) (40 miles (mi)) myrtifolia based upon material collected Status for the Plant Eriogonum southeast of Sacramento in the central near Ione, California. Subsequent Apricum (Ione Buckwheat) and Sierra Nevada foothills of California. authors variously treated this taxon as Proposed Threatened Status for the Most populations occur at elevations Uva-ursi myrtifolia (Abrams 1914), A. Plant Arctostaphylos Myrtifolia (Ione between 90 and 280 meters (m) (280 to nummularia var. myrtifolia (Jepson Manzanita) 900 feet (ft)). A few isolated occurrences 1922), Schizococcus myrtifolius of A. myrtifolia occur in adjacent (Eastwood 1934), and Arctostaphylos AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, northern Calaveras County. uva-ursi ssp. myrtifolia (Roof 1982). Interior. Both species included in
    [Show full text]