DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Prepared by: Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. 6355 Riverside Blvd., Suite C Sacramento, CA 95831-1143 Phone: 916/ 427-0703 Fax: 916/ 427-2175 Contact: R. John Little, Ph.D. Prepared for: Thomas Martin & Associates 120 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 4 Folsom, CA 95630 Phone: 916/ 985-6380 Contact: Mr. Thomas Martin 8 September 2006 Biological Resources Evaluation Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Biological Resources Evaluation Report For Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Table of Contents I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS..................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. Purpose of Report ......................................................................................................................1 B. Project Location.........................................................................................................................1 C. Project Applicant .......................................................................................................................1 D. Project Description ....................................................................................................................1 III. STUDY METHODS.......................................................................................................................5 A. Studies Conducted .....................................................................................................................5 B. Survey Dates and Personnel ......................................................................................................5 C. Problems Encountered and Limitations That May Influence Results .......................................5 D. Literature Search........................................................................................................................5 E. Field Survey Methods................................................................................................................5 F. Mapping...................................................................................................................................11 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.................................................................................................11 A. Biological Communities ..........................................................................................................11 1. Ponderosa Pine – Canyon Live Oak Woodland ................................................................11 2. Ponderosa Pine – Incense Cedar – Big-leaf Maple Forest ................................................12 3. Channels............................................................................................................................12 4. Seep...................................................................................................................................12 5. Seasonal Wetland..............................................................................................................12 B. The Existing Level of Disturbance ..........................................................................................12 V. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA.......................................13 A. Determination of Special-Status Species in the Project Study Area........................................13 B. Special-Status Species not in the Project Study Area..............................................................13 C. Evaluation of Special-Status Wildlife Species ........................................................................14 1. Amphibians .......................................................................................................................14 2. Birds..................................................................................................................................15 D. Evaluation of Special-Status Plants .........................................................................................15 E. Evaluation of Sensitive Natural Communities.........................................................................16 VI. LITERATURE CITED AND PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS .......................................17 A. Literature Cited........................................................................................................................17 VII. PREPARERS .........................................................................................................................19 06079-PineAcresN_BRE_03 9/8/2006 Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. i Biological Resources Evaluation Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Figures Figure 1. Project Location Map. ............................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Aerial Photograph.................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3. Biological Resources Map....................................................................................................... 9 Tables Table 1. Biological Communities. ........................................................................................................ 11 Table 2. Special-status species for which suitable habitat occurs in the PSA. ..................................... 13 Appendices Appendix A. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)/ RareFind) Summary Appendix B. USFWS List Appendix C. Species Evaluated Table Appendix D. Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Appendix E. Photographs of the Project Study Area Appendix F. Applicable Laws and Regulations 06079-PineAcresN_BRE_03 9/8/2006 Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. ii Biological Resources Evaluation Pine Acres North Amador County, CA I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Species listed under the federal or state endangered species acts do not occur in the project study area (PSA). The PSA contains suitable habitat for several special-status plants that are subject to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. None of the special-status plants were observed, but two could be present in the PSA. The PSA provides potential nesting habitat for birds of prey and migratory birds. The California Department of Fish and Game considers ponderosa pine – canyon live oak woodland to be of high priority for inventory in CNDDB (DFG 2003). A jurisdictional delineation report was separately prepared for the PSA (Sycamore Environmental 2006). Potential waters of the U.S. observed in the project study area (PSA) include two intermittent channels, a seep, and a seasonal wetland. Project design has not been finalized. Impact analysis and mitigation measures will be addressed in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document. II. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is to document biological resources in the Pine Acres North PSA. B. Project Location The 43.78-ac PSA is located approximately one mile southeast of the community of Pine Grove in Amador County, CA (Figure 1). The PSA consists of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 038-180- 040,-054,-042 and 038-170-014. The PSA is bound by Highway 88 to the north and Tabeaud Road to the west. The PSA is located on the Pine Grove USGS topographic quad (T7N, R12E, Section 3). The PSA is in hydrologic unit code 18040012, Upper Mokelumne Watershed, and the centroid is 38° 24' 12.00" North, 120° 38' 42.00" West (UTM Zone 10N, NAD 1983). C. Project Applicant Applicant: Engineer: Thomas Martin & Associates Toma & Anderson, Inc. Land Surveying 120 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 4 41 Summit Street Folsom, CA 95630 Jackson, CA 95642 Phone: 916/ 985-6380 Phone: 209/ 223-0156 Fax: 916/ 985-6384 Fax: 209/ 223-5653 Contact: Mr. Thomas Martin Contact: Mr. Ciro L. Toma, PLS D. Project Description The proposed project is a residential subdivision of 66 single-family lots and 32 multi-family units. Project design is not yet complete. 06079-PineAcresN_BRE_03 9/8/2006 Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1 Biological Resources Evaluation Pine Acres North Amador County, CA [This page intentionally blank] 06079-PineAcresN_BRE_03 9/8/2006 Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. 2 Biological Resources Evaluation Pine Acres North Amador County, CA [This page intentionally blank] 06079-PineAcresN_BRE_03 9/8/2006 Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4 Biological Resources Evaluation Pine Acres North Amador County, CA III. STUDY METHODS A. Studies Conducted Studies included conducting field surveys; obtaining and analyzing data from state and federal agencies; and reviewing maps, aerial photographs, and published and unpublished literature. An evaluation of biological resources was conducted to determine if any state or federal-listed special- status plant or wildlife species or their habitat occurs in the PSA. B. Survey Dates and Personnel Biological surveys were conducted by Erin Gibson and Jessica Easley on 25 May 2006 and by Chuck Hughes, M.S., and Ms. Gibson on 6 July 2006. C. Problems Encountered and Limitations That May Influence Results There are no problems or limitations that may have influenced the results. D. Literature Search Information on the biology, distribution, taxonomy, legal status, and other aspects of the special-status species was obtained from documents on file in the library of Sycamore Environmental. Standard references
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Biological Resources
    4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES DRAFT EIR PINE ACRES NORTH NOVEMBER 2009 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION The Biological Resources chapter of the EIR evaluates the biological resources known to occur or potentially occur within the Pine Acres North project (proposed project) site. This chapter describes potential impacts to those resources, and identifies measures to eliminate or substantially reduce those impacts to less-than-significant levels. Existing plant communities, wetlands, wildlife habitats, and potential for special-status species and communities are discussed for the project site. The information contained in this analysis is primarily based on a Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North1 prepared by Sycamore Environmental Consultants (See Appendix G), a Jurisdictional Delineation and Special Status Species Evaluation2 prepared by Gibson & Skordal, LLC (See Appendix H), and an Oak Woodland Assessment3 prepared by Ronald P. Monk Consulting (See Appendix I). EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following sections describe the regional setting of the site, as well as the existing biological resources occurring in the proposed project area. Regional Setting The proposed project site is located in the Sierra Foothills in the western portion of Amador County, approximately one mile southeast of the community of Pine Grove. The proposed site ranges from approximately 2,500 feet to 2,690 feet above mean sea level (MSL) and is located in the Upper Mokelumne watershed. The majority of soils within the project site were formed in material weathered metasedimentary rock and are well drained with medium to very rapid runoff. Project Setting Land uses located within Amador County are primarily agricultural and open space, with residential and commercial areas in existing cities (See Figure 4.3-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Assessment the Ranch ±530- Acre Study Area City of Rancho Cordova, California
    Biological Resources Assessment The Ranch ±530- Acre Study Area City of Rancho Cordova, California Prepared for: K. Hovnanian Homes October 13, 2017 Prepared by: © 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Regulatory Framework ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1. Federal Regulations .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1. Federal Endangered Species Act ............................................................................... 2 2.1.2. Migratory Bird Treaty Act ......................................................................................... 2 2.1.3. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ............................................................... 2 2.2. State Jurisdiction .............................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1. California Endangered Species Act ........................................................................... 3 2.2.2. California Department of Fish and Game Codes ...................................................... 3 2.2.3. Native Plant Protection Act .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cramvernal Pool Endemics-Final.Pdf
    Vernal Pool Systems and Individual Vernal Pools Version 6.1 APPENDIX 1 Vernal Pool Endemic Plant List Use this list to determine if a species is a vernal pool endemic Bsed on Appendix C from: T. Keeler-Wolf, D.R. Elam, K. Lewis, S.A. Flint. 1998. California Vernal Pool Assessment Preliminary Report. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game. 161 pp. www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/wetlands/pdfs/VernalPoolAssessmentPreliminaryReport.pdf May 2013 ! CRAM%Vernal%Pool%Endemic%Plants%List May%2013 Scientific%Name Family Genus Species infraspecific_rank %infraspecific_epithet Agrostis(elliottiana POACEAE Agrostis elliottiana Agrostis(hendersonii POACEAE Agrostis hendersonii Agrostis(microphylla POACEAE Agrostis microphylla Alopecurus(carolinianus POACEAE Alopecurus carolinianus Alopecurus(saccatus POACEAE Alopecurus saccatus Anagallis(minima MYRSINACEAE Anagallis minima Astragalus(tener(var.(ferrisiae FABACEAE Astragalus tener var. ferrisiae Astragalus(tener(var.(tener FABACEAE Astragalus tener var. tener Atriplex(cordulata CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata Atriplex(cordulata(var.(cordulata CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata var. cordulata Atriplex(cordulata(var.(erecticaulis CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata var. erecticaulis Atriplex(depressa CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex depressa Atriplex(minuscula CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex minuscula Atriplex(parishii CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex parishii Atriplex(persistens CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex persistens Atriplex(subtilis CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex subtilis Blennosperma(bakeri ASTERACEAE Blennosperma
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX C Biological Resources
    APPENDIX C Biological Resources ELMTYPE SNAME CNAME ACCURACY 1 Downingia pusilla dwarf downingia nonspecific area 1 Arctostaphylos myrtifolia Ione manzanita specific area 3 Ione Chaparral Ione Chaparral specific area 4 Central Valley Drainage Hardhead/Squawfish Stream Central Valley Drainage Hardhead/Squawfish Stream nonspecific area 1 Sphenopholis obtusata prairie wedge grass 1 mile 2 Antrozous pallidus pallid bat 1 mile 1 Dryopteris filix-mas male fern 1 mile 1 Arctostaphylos myrtifolia Ione manzanita 1 mile 1 Eryngium pinnatisectum Tuolumne button-celery 1 mile 1 Navarretia myersii ssp. myersii pincushion navarretia 1 mile 2 Martes pennanti (pacifica) DPS Pacific fisher 1 mile 3 Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool 1 mile 1 Arctostaphylos myrtifolia Ione manzanita 1 mile 2 Martes pennanti (pacifica) DPS Pacific fisher 1 mile 2 Gulo gulo California wolverine 1 mile 1 Navarretia myersii ssp. myersii pincushion navarretia specific area 1 Eryngium pinnatisectum Tuolumne button-celery 3/5 mile 2 Banksula rudolphi Rudolph's cave harvestman 3/5 mile 1 Helianthemum suffrutescens Bisbee Peak rush-rose 3/5 mile 1 Helianthemum suffrutescens Bisbee Peak rush-rose 3/5 mile 2 Chrysis tularensis Tulare cuckoo wasp 3/5 mile 1 Navarretia myersii ssp. myersii pincushion navarretia 3/5 mile 1 Sphenopholis obtusata prairie wedge grass 3/5 mile 2 Vulpes vulpes necator Sierra Nevada red fox nonspecific area 3 Ione Chaparral Ione Chaparral specific area 1 Arctostaphylos myrtifolia Ione manzanita specific area 1 Chlorogalum grandiflorum Red Hills soaproot 2/5 mile 2 Agelaius tricolor tricolored blackbird 2/5 mile 1 Arctostaphylos myrtifolia Ione manzanita specific area 3 Ione Chaparral Ione Chaparral specific area 3 Ione Chaparral Ione Chaparral specific area 1 Arctostaphylos myrtifolia Ione manzanita specific area 1 Eriogonum apricum var.
    [Show full text]
  • Special-Status Plant Survey Badger Street Bridge Replacement Project
    Special-Status Plant Survey for Badger Street Bridge Replacement Project Amador County, California California Department of Transportation District 10 City of Sutter Creek 10AMA – Badger Street Bridge (No. 26C0036) Over Sutter Creek Federal Aid Number: BRLS 5215 (011) 25 September 2013 Special-Status Plant Survey CONTENTS Badger Street Bridge Replacement 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Existing Site Conditions .................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Vegetation Communities ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Wetland Delineation .............................................................................................................. 5 1.2.3 Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Previously Documented Special-Status Plant Occurrences ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Docoileus Hemionus) Range
    Appendix D BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Study Area Figure 1 PROJECT VICINITY 0 105 Moore Biological Blue Mountain Minerals Miles . Consultants Tuolumne County, CA Legend Base map: Columbia, CA, USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle Existing Permit Area Sections: 2 & 3 Township: 02N Revised Fill Area Range: 14E Figure 2 PROJECT LOCATION 0 1,000 2,000 Moore Biological Blue Mountain Minerals Feet . Consultants Tuolumne County, CA agricultural fill area will reach an elevation of 2,135 feet. Maximum slopes of the revised fill area will not exceed natural slopes on adjacent hillsides, and will be less steep than the currently approved fill design. A 3:1 slope ratio will be followed around the perimeter and the final upper surface of the revised fill area will be nearly flat. The Agricultural Fill Area will be revegetated in blue oak- digger pine woodland (BOP), valley oak woodland (VOW), and annual grassland (AGS) habitats. Regulatory Requirements: Clean Water Act: The Clean Water Act (CWA) 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376) provides guidance for the restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Section 404 of the CWA established a permit program administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) regulating the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States (including wetlands). Implementing regulations by ACOE are found at 33 CFR Parts 320-330. Guidelines for implementation are referred to as the Section 404 (b)(1) Guidelines and were developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in conjunction with ACOE (40 CFR Parts 230).
    [Show full text]
  • Delaney Aggregates Biological Resources Assessment
    Delaney Aggregates Biological Resources Assessment Stanislaus County CALIFORNIA Prepared For: George Morrow Jim Brisco Enterprises, Inc. 3549 W. McSwain Road Merced, CA 95340 [email protected] Phone: 209-761-2617 Contact: Michael Josselyn PhD, PWS [email protected] Date: November 2007 revised June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 3 1.1 General Delaney Property Description ................................ 3 1.2 Project Description ............................................... 3 2.0 METHODS ........................................................... 4 2.1 Biological Communities............................................ 4 2.1.1 Non-sensitive Biological Communities .......................... 4 2.1.2 Sensitive Biological Communities and Aquatic Features ............ 4 2.2 Special Status Species............................................ 8 2.2.1 Literature Review .......................................... 8 2.2.2 Site Assessment........................................... 8 3.0 RESULTS............................................................ 9 3.1 Biological Communities............................................ 9 3.1.1 Non-Sensitive Communities within the Project Area................ 9 3.1.2 Non-Sensitive Communities within the Delaney Property ........... 11 3.1.3 Sensitive Biological Communities within the Project Area .......... 11 3.1.4 Sensitive Biological Communities within the Delaney Property ...... 11 3.1.5 Aquatic Features .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices I Through VIII
    APPENDIX I: Standards for Ecological Classification A given terrestrial ecological system is defined as a group of plant community types that tend to co-occur within landscapes with similar ecological processes, substrates, and/or environmental gradients. A given terrestrial ecological system will typically manifest itself in a landscape at intermediate geographic scales of 10s to 1,000s of hectares and persist for 50 or more years. Ecological processes include natural disturbances such as fire and flooding. Substrates may include a variety of soil surface and bedrock features, such as shallow soils, alkaline parent materials, sandy/gravelling soils, or peatlands. Finally, environmental gradients include hydrologically defined patterns in coastal zones, arid grassland or desert areas, or montane, alpine or subalpine zones defined by climate. By plant community type, we mean a vegetation classification unit at the association or alliance level of the US National Vegetation Classification (US-NVC) (Grossman et al. 1998, Jennings et al. 2003, NatureServe 2004), or, if these are not available, other comparable vegetation units. US-NVC associations are used wherever possible to describe the component biotic communities of each terrestrial system. Ecological systems are defined using both spatial and temporal criteria that influence the grouping of associations. Associations that consistently co-occur on the landscape therefore define biotic components of each ecological system type. Our approach to ecological systems definition using US-NVC associations is similar to the biotope or habitat approach used, for example, by the EUNIS habitat classification, which explicitly links meso-scale habitat units to European Vegetation Survey alliance units (Rodwell et al. 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Plant Life
    NATURAL RESOURCES PLANT LIFE Folsom Lake State Recreation Area April 2003 by LSA Associates 157 Park Place Pt. Richmond, CA 94801 List of Tables Table PL-1: Summary of Terretrial Vegetation Community in Folsom Lake SRA .......................................PL-50 Table PL-2: Plant Species Observed or Potentially Occurring in Folsom Lake SRA ....................................PL-53 Table PL-3: Special Status Plant Species Occurring in the General Vicinity of the Folsom SRA.................PL-83 List of Figures Figure PL-1: Photograph – Chamise Chaparral..............................................................................................PL-89 Figure PL-2: Map – Chamise Chaparral.........................................................................................................PL-90 Figure PL-3: Photograph – Interior Live Oak Woodland...............................................................................PL-91 Figure PL-4a: Map – Interior Live Oak Woodland ........................................................................................PL-92 Figure PL-4b: Map – Interior Live Oak Woodland........................................................................................PL-93 Figure PL-5: Photograph – BlueOak Savanna................................................................................................PL-94 Figure PL-6: Photograph – Blue Oak Woodland............................................................................................PL-94 Figure PL-7a: Map – Blue Oak Woodland and Savanna................................................................................PL-95
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Surveys and Vegetation Mapping For
    Appendix A Rare Plant and Vegetation Surveys 2002 and 2003 Santa Ysabel Ranch Open Space Preserve Prepared For The Nature Conservancy San Diego County Field Office The County of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation By Virginia Moran, M.S. Botany Sole Proprietor Ecological Outreach Services P.O. Box 2858 Grass Valley, California 95945 Southeast view from the northern portion of the West Ranch with snow-frosted Volcan Mountain in the background. Information contained in this report is that of Ecological Outreach Services and all rights thereof reserved. Santa Ysabel Ranch Botanical Surveys 2 Contents I. Summary ……………………………………………………………… ……………. 4 II. Introduction and Methods……………………………..……………… …………… 5 III Results…………………………………………………………………...…………… 6 III.A. East Ranch Species of Interest Plant Communities III.B. West Ranch Species of Interest Plant Communities III.C. Sensitive Resources of the Santa Ysabel Ranch IV. Discussion……………………………………………………………….……………. 14 V. Conclusion…………………………………………….……………….……………… 18 VI. Management Recommendations…………………….……………………… …….. 19 VII. Suggested Future Projects………………….…….……………………… …………26 VIII. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………… …….. 28 IX. References Cited / Consulted ……………………..……………………………….. 29 X. Maps and Figures ………………………….……………………………… ……... 30 Appendices 1 - 6 …………………………….…………………………………………….…44 Santa Ysabel Ranch Botanical Surveys 3 I. Summary The Santa Ysabel Ranch Open Space Preserve was established in 2001 from a purchase by The Nature Conservancy from the Edwards Family; the Ranch is now owned by the County of San Diego and managed as a Department of Parks and Recreation Open Space Preserve. It totals nearly 5,400 acres and is comprised of two parcels; an "East Ranch” and a "West Ranch". The East Ranch is east of the town of Santa Ysabel (and Highway 79 running north) and is bordered on the east by Farmer's Road in Julian.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.4 Biological Resources
    4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section contains a description of the existing biological resources in the planning area, and an evaluation of how implementation of the Draft General Plan would affect biological resources. Mitigation measures are provided for all significant and potentially significant direct, indirect and cumulative impacts. 4.4.1 REGULATORY SETTING FEDERAL PLANS, POLICIES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWS Federal Endangered Species Act The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) have jurisdiction over projects that may result in a “take” of species listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). NMFS has jurisdiction over a limited number of anadramous species. In the below ESA discussion; “UWFWS” is meant to include both USFWS and NMFS. Under the ESA (16 U.S. Code [USC] 153 et seq.), the definition of “take” is to “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” USFWS has also interpreted the definition of “harm” to include significant habitat modification that could result in take. For projects where federal action is not involved and take of a listed species may occur, a project proponent may seek an incidental take permit under Section 10(a) of the ESA. Section 10(a) of ESA allows USFWS to permit the incidental take of listed species if such take is accompanied by a habitat conservation plan that ensures minimizing and mitigation of impacts associated with the take. Section 7 of the ESA outlines procedures for federal interagency cooperation to protect and conserve federally listed species and designated critical habitat.
    [Show full text]