DOCSLIB.ORG

The Making of Steam Power Technology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Making of Steam Power Technology The Making of Steam Power Technology A Study of Technical Change during the British Industrial Revolution _____________________________________________________________________ Alessandro Nuvolari Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies (ECIS) Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands CIP – DATA LIBRARY TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITEIT EINDHOVEN Nuvolari, Alessandro The making of steam power technology / by Alessandro Nuvolari. – Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2004. – Proefschrift. – ISBN 90-386-2077-2 NUR 696 Keywords: Economical history / Industrial history / Steam engines; history Cover illustration: John Farey, vertical section of Arthur Woolf’s compound engine at Wheal Vor Mine (Cornwall), circa 1839 Cover design: Paul Verspaget Printing: Eindhoven University Press The Making of Steam Power Technology A Study of Technical Change during the British Industrial Revolution PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, prof.dr. R.A. van Santen, voor een commissie aangewezen door het College voor Promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 23 september 2004 om 16.00 uur door Alessandro Nuvolari geboren te Mantova, Italië Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotoren: prof.dr. H.H.G. Verspagen en prof.dr. G.N. von Tunzelmann Copromotor: dr.ir. G.P.J. Verbong ‘You see, Tom,’ said Mr Deane, at last, throwing himself backward, ‘the world goes on at a smarter pace now than it did when I was a young fellow. Why, sir, forty years ago, when I was much such a strapping youngster as you, a man expected to pull between the shafts the best part of his life, before he got the whip in his hand. The looms went slowish, and fashions didn’t alter quite so fast – I’d a best suit that lasted me six years. Everything was on a lower scale, sir – in point of expenditure, I mean. It’s this steam, you see, that has made the difference – it drives on every wheel double pace and the wheel of Fortune along with’ em……. George Eliot, The Mill on the Floss Preface This book is the result of a PhD project that I undertook at the Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies (ECIS) about four years ago. As it was originally formulated, the research aimed at exploring systematically a small portion of what Sir John Habakkuk called “the debatable borderland between history, technology and economics”. For several reasons, the case of steam power technology seemed a particular suitable ground for exploiting the potentialities of cross-fertilization between the three disciplines. My greatest debt is to my supervisors: Bart Verspagen, Nick von Tunzelmann and Geert Verbong. Bart Verspagen has been an invaluable source of inspiration, first by helping me in the identification of the relevant research challenges and then by providing, at every step, suggestions on how to tackle them. The intellectual debt I owe Nick von Tunzelmann will be, without doubt, apparent to every reader of Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860. Additionally, Nick provided a precious and continuous critical feedback on my research findings. Finally, Geert Verbong, introduced me to the history of steam engine technology, which, before coming to Eindhoven, was completely unknown to me. Furthermore, in various topical moments, Geert drew my attention to the historical importance of issues that, at first sight, looked simply as inconsequential engineering details. Remarkably, in other circumstances, he invited me to broaden the perspective and take into account the wider context in which technological developments had taken place. In the four years I spent working on the thesis, I was fortunate enough to share my office with colleagues, that soon became invaluable friends: Michiel van Dijk, Andriew Lim and Frank Vercoulen. Besides help and suggestions on parts of the thesis, they are responsible for creating a somewhat chaotic but wonderfully pleasant working environment. It was this atmosphere that greatly helped me to cope with the occasional moments of frustration and temporary set-backs that are typical of every long research project. Koen Frenken, Carolina Castaldi and Christine MacLeod deserve a very special word of acknowledgment. Koen pushed me to consider the potentialities of complex systems theory for the study of technological change. The results reported in chapter 4 are the outcome of a joint research effort that we undertook in this direction. In addition, Koen made extensive comments on various parts of the thesis. Carolina provided encouragement, suggestions and advice in the concluding phase when I had to weave together the various threads of the research. Finally, I am particularly grateful to Christine for many enjoyable discussions and stimulating electronic correspondence on various aspects of the process of technological change during the British Industrial Revolution. viii The Making of Steam Power Technology Special thanks go to John W. Kanefsky for providing me with the updated version of his dataset of eighteenth century British steam engines which has been the basis for the findings reported in chapters 3 and 4. Along the road, I have enormously benefited from recurring “wide-ranging” discussions with an “invisible college” of friends and colleagues who are also engaged, in various ways, in the “craft” of innovation studies, namely Nicoletta Corrocher, Bart Los, Roberto Fontana, Paola Criscuolo, Fergal Shortall, Stefano Brusoni, Eugenia Cacciatori and Jerry Silverberg. I am deeply grateful to all of them for being an unfailing source of new ideas and enthusiasm for research. Within ECIS, I could not overlook the support of my colleagues and office neighbours of the “Technology and Policy” department. In particular, I would like to mention Eddy Szirmai, Rudi Bekkers, Ted Clarkson, Jojo Jacob, Onder Nomaler, Effie Kesidou, Cristoph Meister, Orietta Marsili, Andre’ Lorentz, Brian Portelli, Martijn Bakker and Bert Sadowski. I would like also to thank the members of the “reading committee” Kristine Bruland and Joel Mokyr for thoughtful comments on the first draft of the thesis. A grant of the European Commission (Marie Curie fellowship) gave me the opportunity to spend a period of six months at SPRU (Science and Technology Policy Research), University of Sussex. The grant was also instrumental for the collection of the data on steam engine patents used in chapter 5. SPRU proved to be another important source of inspiration for my research. I want to thank Aldo Geuna, Vincente Benito Ortiz, Ed Steinmueller, Isabel(la) Freitas, Elisa Giuliani, Andrea Prencipe and Ammon Salter for making my stay at SPRU particularly enjoyable, not only from a “scientific” point of view. I wish to express my deep gratitude to the staff of the Cornish Studies Library (Cornwall Centre, Redruth), the Royal Institution of Cornwall (Truro), the Science Museum Library (London) and the British Library (London) for their help and guidance. In Eindhoven, Leon Osinski provided constant assistance with library matters. Two research seminars given at CESPRI (Centro di Studio sui Processi di Innovazione e Internazionalizzazione), Bocconi University, Milan, represented an extremely stimulating sounding board for my preliminary research findings. I am particularly grateful for their constructive criticisms to Franco Malerba, Francesco Lissoni, Anna Canato, Stefano Breschi, Fabio Montobbio, Marco Guerzoni, Lucia Cusmano, Maria Luisa Mancusi, Lorenzo Cassi and Lorenzo Zirulia. In retrospect, I realize that most of the suggestions I received at CESPRI have found their way in the final version of the book. Chris Hodrien suggested me a number of very helpful references on steam engineering matters. Bridget Howard read and kindly commented in detail an early version of chapter 5. The present version takes into account her remarks, although I am fairly sure that she will still consider some of the conclusions I reach with some degree of scepticism. Finally, parts of this work were presented at various seminars, conferences, summer schools and workshops in Strasbourg, Dublin, Lisbon, Cargese, Durham, Manchester, Paris, Pisa, Copenhagen, Reading, Groningen, Utrecht, Philadelphia, and Augsburg. I would like to thank the participants at these meetings (especially Richard Nelson, Pat Preface ix Hudson, Liliane Hilaire-Perez, Dominique Foray, Laura Magazzini, Ben Gales, Fulvio Castellacci, Marcel P. Timmer, Paul A. David, Alfonso Gambardella, Bart van Ark and Nick Crafts) for their comments and suggestions. Alessandro Nuvolari Eindhoven, July 2004 Contents Preface vii 1. Introduction 1 PART I. THE BACKGROUND 2. The Development of Steam Power Technology 11 PART II. THE EMERGENCE OF STEAM ENGINE TECHNOLOGY DURING THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY 3. The Diffusion of the Steam Engine in Eighteenth Century Britain 47 4. The Early Development of the Steam Engine: An Evolutionary Interpretation using Complexity Theory 69 PART III. THE APPLICATION OF STEAM TECHNOLOGY IN THE CORNISH MINING DISTRICT 5. Collective Invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine 95 6. “Unravelling the Duty”: Lean’s Engine Reporter and the Development of the Cornish Steam Engine 123 7. The Drivers of Technical Progress in Cornish Steam Engines 159 PART IV. CONCLUSIONS 8. The Making of Steam Power Technology in Retrospect 179 Bibliography 191 Summary in Dutch (Samenvatting) 205 About the Author 209 1. Introduction 1.1. Preliminary considerations In the Preface to the first edition of The Making
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Diffusion of Newcomen Engines, 1706-73: a Reassessment*
    1 The Diffusion of Newcomen Engines, 1706-73: A Reassessment* By Harry Kitsikopoulos Abstract The present paper attempts to quantify the diffusion of Newcomen engines in the British economy prior to the commercial application of the first Watt engine. It begins by pointing out omissions and discrepancies between the original Kanefsky database and the secondary literature leading to a number of revisions of the former. The diffusion path is subsequently drawn in terms of adopted horsepower and adjusted for the proportion of the latter being in use throughout the period. This methodology differs from previous studies which quantify diffusion based on the number of steam engines and do not take into account those falling out of use. The results are presented in terms of aggregate, sectoral, and regional patterns of diffusion. Finally, following a long held methodology of the literature on technological diffusion, the paper weighs the number of engines installed by the end of the period in relation to the potential range of adopters. In the end, this method generates a less celebratory assessment regarding the pace of diffusion of Newcomen engines. *The author wishes to thank Alessandro Nuvolari for providing access to the Kanefsky database. Two summer fellowships from the NEH/Folger Institute and Dibner Library (Smithsonian), whose staff was exceptionally helpful (especially Bill Baxter and Ron Brashear), allowed me to draw heavily material from the collection of rare books of the latter. Two graduate students, Lawrence Costa and Michel Dilmanian, proved to be superb research assistants by handling the revisions made by the author to the database, coming up with the graphs, and running the tests involved in the third appendix of the paper as well as writing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Steam As a General Purpose Technology: a Growth Accounting Perspective
    Working Paper No. 75/03 Steam as a General Purpose Technology: A Growth Accounting Perspective Nicholas Crafts © Nicholas Crafts Department of Economic History London School of Economics May 2003 Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE Tel: +44 (0)20 7955 6399 Fax: +44 (0)20 7955 7730 1. Introduction* In recent years there has been an upsurge of interest among growth economists in General Purpose Technologies (GPTs). A GPT can be defined as "a technology that initially has much scope for improvement and evntually comes to be widely used, to have many uses, and to have many Hicksian and technological complementarities" (Lipsey et al., 1998a, p. 43). Electricity, steam and information and communications technologies (ICT) are generally regarded as being among the most important examples. An interesting aspect of the occasional arrival of new GPTs that dominate macroeconomic outcomes is that they imply that the growth process may be subject to episodes of sharp acceleration and deceleration. The initial impact of a GPT on overall productivity growth is typically minimal and the realization of its eventual potential may take several decades such that the largest growth effects are quite long- delayed, as with electricity in the early twentieth century (David, 1991). Subsequently, as the scope of the technology is finally exhausted, its impact on growth will fade away. If, at that point, a new GPT is yet to be discovered or only in its infancy, a growth slowdown might be observed. A good example of this is taken by the GPT literature to be the hiatus between steam and electricity in the later nineteenth century (Lipsey et al., 1998b), echoing the famous hypothesis first advanced by Phelps-Brown and Handfield-Jones, 1952) to explain the climacteric in British economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquidneck Island's Reluctant Revolutionaries, 16'\8- I 660
    Rhode Island History Pubhshed by Th e Rhod e bland Hrstoncal Society, 110 Benevolent St reet, Volume 44, Number I 1985 Providence, Rhode Island, 0 1~, and February prmted by a grant from th e Stale of Rhode Island and Providence Plamauons Contents Issued Ouanerl y at Providence, Rhode Island, ~bruary, May, Au~m , and Freedom of Religion in Rhode Island : November. Secoed class poet age paId al Prcvrdence, Rhode Island Aquidneck Island's Reluctant Revolutionaries, 16'\8- I 660 Kafl Encson , presIdent S HEI LA L. S KEMP Alden M. Anderson, VIet presIdent Mrs Edwin G FI!I.chel, vtce preudenr M . Rachtl Cunha, seatrory From Watt to Allen to Corliss: Stephen Wllhams. treasurer Arnold Friedman, Q.u ur<lnt secretary One Hundred Years of Letting Off Steam n u ow\ O f THl ~n TY 19 Catl Bndenbaugh C H AR LES H O F f M A N N AND TESS HOFFMANN Sydney V James Am cmeree f . Dowrun,; Richard K Showman Book Reviews 28 I'UIIU CAT!O~ S COM!I4lTT l l Leonard I. Levm, chairmen Henry L. P. Beckwith, II. loc i Cohen NOl1lUn flerlOlJ: Raben Allen Greene Pamtla Kennedy Alan Simpson William McKenzIe Woodward STAff Glenn Warren LaFamasie, ed itor (on leave ] Ionathan Srsk, vUlI1ng edltot Maureen Taylo r, tncusre I'drlOt Leonard I. Levin, copy editor [can LeGwin , designer Barbara M. Passman, ednonat Q8.lislant The Rhode Island Hrsto rrcal Socrerv assumes no respcnsrbihrv for the opinions 01 ccntnbutors . Cl l9 8 j by The Rhode Island Hrstcncal Society Thi s late nmeteensh-centurv illustration presents a romanticized image of Anne Hutchinson 's mal during the AntJnomian controversy.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10 Long Title.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15382-9 - Heroes of Invention: Technology, Liberalism and British Identity, 1750-1914 Christine MacLeod Index More information Index Acade´mie des Sciences 80, 122, 357 arms manufacturers 236–9 Adam, Robert 346 Armstrong, William, Baron Armstrong of Adams, John Couch 369 Cragside Aikin, John 43, 44, 71 arms manufacturer 220 Airy, Sir George 188, 360 as hero of industry 332 Albert, Prince 24, 216, 217, 231, 232, 260 concepts of invention 268, 269, 270 Alfred, King 24 entrepreneurial abilities of 328 Amalgamated Society of Engineers, knighted 237–8 Machinists, Millwrights, Smiths and monument to 237 Pattern Makers 286–7 opposition to patent system 250, 267–8 ancestor worship, see idolatry portrait of 230 Anderson’s Institution, Glasgow 113, 114, president of BAAS 355 288, 289 Punch’s ‘Lord Bomb’ 224–5 Arago, Franc¸ois 122, 148, 184 Ashton, T. S. 143 Eloge, to James Watt 122–3, 127 Athenaeum, The 99–101, 369 Arkwright, Sir Richard, Atkinson, T. L. 201 and scientific training 359 Atlantic telegraph cables 243, 245, 327 as national benefactor 282 Arthur, King 15 as workers’ hero 286 Askrill, Robert 213 commemorations of, 259 Associated Society of Locomotive Cromford mills, painting of 63 Engineers and Firemen 288 enterprise of 196, 327, 329 era of 144 Babbage, Charles 276, 353, 356–7, factory system 179 375, 383 in Erasmus Darwin’s poetry 67–8 Bacon, Sir Francis in Maria Edgeworth’s book 171 as discoverer 196 in Samuel Smiles’ books 255, 256 as genius 51, 53, 142 invention of textile machinery 174, 176 bust of 349 knighthood 65 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Lean's Engine Reporter and the Development of The
    Trans. Newcomen Soc., 77 (2007), 167–189 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics Lean’s Engine Reporter and the Development of the Cornish Engine: A Reappraisal by Alessandro NUVOLARI and Bart VERSPAGEN THE ORIGINS OF LEAN’S ENGINE REPORTER A Boulton and Watt engine was first installed in Cornwall in 1776 and, from that year, Cornwall progressively became one of the British counties making the most intensive use of steam power.1 In Cornwall, steam engines were mostly employed for draining water from copper and tin mines (smaller engines, called ‘whim engines’ were also employed to draw ore to the surface). In comparison with other counties, Cornwall was characterized by a relative high price for coal which was imported from Wales by sea.2 It is not surprising then that, due to their superior fuel efficiency, Watt engines were immediately regarded as a particularly attractive proposition by Cornish mining entrepreneurs (commonly termed ‘adventurers’ in the local parlance).3 Under a typical agreement between Boulton and Watt and the Cornish mining entre- preneurs, the two partners would provide the drawings and supervise the works of erection of the engine; they would also supply some particularly important components of the engine (such as some of the valves). These expenditures would have been charged to the mine adventurers at cost (i.e. not including any profit for Boulton and Watt). In addition, the mine adventurer had to buy the other components of the engine not directly supplied by the Published by & (c) The Newcomen Society two partners and to build the engine house.
    [Show full text]
  • Soho Depicted: Prints, Drawings and Watercolours of Matthew Boulton, His Manufactory and Estate, 1760-1809
    SOHO DEPICTED: PRINTS, DRAWINGS AND WATERCOLOURS OF MATTHEW BOULTON, HIS MANUFACTORY AND ESTATE, 1760-1809 by VALERIE ANN LOGGIE A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History of Art College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis explores the ways in which the industrialist Matthew Boulton (1728-1809) used images of his manufactory and of himself to help develop what would now be considered a ‘brand’. The argument draws heavily on archival research into the commissioning process, authorship and reception of these depictions. Such information is rarely available when studying prints and allows consideration of these images in a new light but also contributes to a wider debate on British eighteenth-century print culture. The first chapter argues that Boulton used images to convey messages about the output of his businesses, to draw together a diverse range of products and associate them with one site. Chapter two explores the setting of the manufactory and the surrounding estate, outlining Boulton’s motivation for creating the parkland and considering the ways in which it was depicted.
    [Show full text]
  • Jabez Carter Hornblower 07 27 2009
    Jabez Carter Hornblower 1744-1814 Jabez Carter Hornblower, Engineer and Inventor (1744-1814) © 2009 Susan W. Howard Penrosefam.org July 27, 2009 Chapter 1 “Jabez” is a biblical name meaning sorrow or trouble. For the firstborn child of Jonathan and Ann Hornblower the name was indeed prophetic; troubles plagued him throughout his life. His middle name, Carter, came from his mother’s family. Although he was the only Hornblower child given a middle name, he was often confused with a younger brother, Jonathan Junior, who is often called Jonathan Carter Hornblower. This confusion persists today in a number of books and an occasional scholarly article.1 If we look only at the low points of the life of Jabez Carter Hornblower, we might wonder how he kept going through seventy years of losses and failures. Yet, he had an amazing resiliency and recovered from depressing circumstances including bankruptcy and debtor’s prison. Despite negative judgments on his character, Jabez had many good qualities. Fortunately his daughter Annetta Hornblower Hillhouse wrote a brief biography of this intriguing figure. His nephew, journalist and writer of memoirs Cyrus Redding, added to the story. Jabez wrote many letters that have survived; yet not all of these have not been studied in relation to his life story. Ann Carter Hornblower gave birth to her first child, Jabez, on 21 May 1744 in Staffordshire, England. He was christened on 10 December 1744, at St. Leonard, Broseley, Shropshire, where Ann’s family lived. Jonathan Hornblower’s parents, Joseph and Rebecca, were members of a closely-knit circle of Baptist friends of Thomas Newcomen, inventor of the atmospheric steam engine.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 3 Steam Engine Governor Having a Close Approximation to Perfect Action
    21 3 ON A SIMPLE CONSTRUOTION OF STEAM ENGINE GOVERNOR HAVING A CLOSE APPROXIMATION TO PERFECT ACTION. BY ME. JEREMIAH HEAD, OF MIDDLESBBOUGH. The irregularity of speed tolwhich all steam engines are liable arises from two principal causes : variation in the pressure of steam supplied, and variation in the amount of resistance to be overcome. Variation of steam pressure may arise from irregular firing, overtaxed boilers, or in the case of waste-heat boilers, from several dampers happening to be closed at once, and from other similar and obvious cauaes. Variation in resistance occurs when the work to be performed is from its nature intermittent ; this variation is at its minimum in such engines as those used for pumping or blowing, and at its maximum in engines such as are attached to saw-mills, rolling mills, grindstones and shears. If an engine readily lags in speed when the resistance increases, its efficiency is lessened just when most required ; and if it “runs away” when relieved of work, or when the steam pressure is higher than ordinary, the wear and tear of the machinery connected with it is increased, and at the same time steam is wasted in doing the mischief. These considerations were all fully recognised by Watt, who sought to remedy them by his well- known steam engine governor. Although imperfect and partial in its action, this governor is sufficient for many purposes; and its extreme simplicity has caused it to remain to the present time in more extensive use than any other. It acts on a throttle-valve inserted in the steam-pipe close to the valve-chest, and partly closes the throttle-valve when the normal speed is exceeded, and opens it wider when the speed falls below the ordinary rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Age of Steam" Reconsidered
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Castaldi, Carolina; Nuvolari, Alessandro Working Paper Technological revolution and economic growth: The "age of steam" reconsidered LEM Working Paper Series, No. 2004/11 Provided in Cooperation with: Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Suggested Citation: Castaldi, Carolina; Nuvolari, Alessandro (2004) : Technological revolution and economic growth: The "age of steam" reconsidered, LEM Working Paper Series, No. 2004/11, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Pisa This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/89286 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Laboratory of Economics and Management Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33 - 56127 PISA (Italy) Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • The President Pump and Its' Cornish Engine House
    The PresidentPhoto Pump – Upper and Saucon Its’Township Cornish Record EngineCollection House Mark Connar SIA Annual Conference – Richmond Virginia June 2, 2018 “ The Elevator Speech” • The existing President Engine House and the area surrounding the structure is a 19th century mining industry time capsule. • Protection, preservation, interpretation and recognition of this engine house and its surroundings is of vital importance because: Ø It is the only structure and physical setting remaining of the earliest industrial age enterprise in the Lehigh Valley; Ø The engine house is part of, arguably, the largest single cylinder stationary steam engine ever built anywhere in the world; Ø The engine house is a unique structure which is the only surviving example in the United States. King Arthur’s Castle in Saucon Valley Photos – Connar Collection Made in America – “Largest Stationary Engine in the World” Photos– newspapers.com/SMU Central University Library digital collection (top right)/philadelphiaencycolopedia.org (bottom left) John West and the Perkiomen Copper Mines Photos – Connar Collection/Historical Society of Montgomery County/newspapers.com The West Family of Cambourne Photos – courtesy of John Manley “The President” - General Grant Pump Photo – Ulysses S. Grant, 17th President of the United States, Library of Congress, LC-USZ62-13018DLC The President – View from Mine Pit (West Edge) Photo – Connar, Source Unknown The President – View from Mine Pit (Northwest Edge) Photo – Miller, Lead and Zinc Ores in Pennsylvania Typical Engine House Sectional Photo – Nance, Engine Houses of West Cornwall The President’s Floor Plan Drawing – courtesy of Damian Nance The President Diagram – Scientific American Supplement 1 – August 5, 1876 The President “It is the triumph of the rotative system as applied to a mine pump.
    [Show full text]
  • INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: SERIES ONE: the Boulton and Watt Archive, Parts 2 and 3
    INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: SERIES ONE: The Boulton and Watt Archive, Parts 2 and 3 Publisher's Note - Part - 3 Over 3500 drawings covering some 272 separate engines are brought together in this section devoted to original manuscript plans and diagrams. Watt’s original engine was a single-acting device for producing a reciprocating stroke. It had an efficiency four times that of the atmospheric engine and was used extensively for pumping water at reservoirs, by brine works, breweries, distilleries, and in the metal mines of Cornwall. To begin with it played a relatively small part in the coal industry. In the iron industry these early engines were used to raise water to turn the great wheels which operated the bellows, forge hammers, and rolling mills. Even at this first stage of development it had important effects on output. However, Watt was extremely keen to make improvements on his initial invention. His mind had long been busy with the idea of converting the to and fro action into a rotary movement, capable of turning machinery and this was made possible by a number of devices, including the 'sun-and-planet', a patent for which was taken out in 1781. In the following year came the double-acting, rotative engine, in 1784 the parallel motion engine, and in 1788, a device known as the 'governor', which gave the greater regularity and smoothness of working essential in a prime mover for the more delicate and intricate of industrial processes. The introduction of the rotative engine was a momentous event. By 1800 Boulton and Watt had built and put into operation over 500 engines, a large majority being of the 'sun and planet type'.
    [Show full text]
  • Steam Engines
    Evolving Design Steam Engines Tetsuo Tomiyama ([email protected]) 1 Intelligent Mechanical Systems, Bio-Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering Overview • A Small Question • History of Thermodynamics • Steam Engines • Thomas Newcomen • James Watt • After Watt • Improvements • Steam Cars • Steam Locomotives • Steamboats • Exam 2008 Wb3110: Steam Engines 2 ©2011 Tetsuo Tomiyama Which is the Oldest? • MIT 1861 • Second Law of Thermodynamics 1850 Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius (1822-1888) • TU Delft 1842 Wb3110: Steam Engines 3 ©2011 Tetsuo Tomiyama Definition of Mechanical Engineering • “To Build and Run a Steam Engine!” • (Unofficial Version@ME MIT) Wb3110: Steam Engines 4 ©2011 Tetsuo Tomiyama History of Thermodynamics • 1660: Robert Boyle Boyle's Law • 1712: Thomas Newcomen • 1741: École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussés • 1765: James Watt (Only the Idea) • 1770: Steam Car • 1776: James Watt (The Engine), Steamboat • 1794: Ecole Polytechnique • 1804: Steam Locomotive • 1824: Sadi Carnot, Carnot Cycle • 1842: TU Delft Wb3110: Steam Engines 5 ©2011 Tetsuo Tomiyama History of Thermodynamics • 1843: James Joule, Mechanical Equivalent of Heat • 1847: Hermann von Helmholtz, Definitive Statement of the First Law of Thermodynamics • 1849: William John Macquorn Rankine, Saturated Vapor Table (Pressure and Temperature) • 1850: Rudolf Clausius, The Second Law of Thermodynamics • 1851: Thomson an Alternative Statement of the Second Law • 1854: Clausius, Found dQ/T, but Did Not Name It • 1854: Rankine, Entropy
    [Show full text]