Bats and Small Woodlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Woodland Fish & Wildlife • 2019 Bats and Small Woodlands Authors: Ken Bevis, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Barbara Garcia, United States Forest Service, Susan Barnes, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Eliana Pool, Cafferata Consulting. Introduction of insects too, but they mostly work the plant productivity. Note: Though some day shift. Many insects only come out bats are pollinators, we don’t have any Bats are small flying mammals that come at night (think moths). Nocturnal bats, bats in Oregon and Washington that are out at night, emerging from crevices in therefore, are the primary predator of considered pollinators. rocks, trees, caves, bridges and build- numerous forest damaging species such Globally, bats are the second most di- ings with the ability to fly in complete as defoliating moths and cambium eat- darkness! Bats are a remarkably diverse verse mammalian species group (Order ing beetles. All of the bat species in Or- Chiroptera – behind Rodentia), with and wide spread species group, with egon and Washington are insectivorous important ecological roles. approximately 1,300 species worldwide (eat insects). Bats also assist in nutrient (www.batcon.org). Specific information Bats have enormously important, and cycling by widely distributing droppings on bats in Oregon and Washington is generally unseen, ecological roles. In (guano). Bat guano is rich in nutrients, found in Table 1. Note that at the time the Pacific Northwest, bats are best phosphorous and nitrogen in particular, of this publication, the Keen’s myotis known for providing insect control. A which are important for tree growth and status as a separate species is under nursing little brown bat can consume review. Oregon and Washington pro- Canyon bat her weight in insects in a single night vide a wide array of habitats supporting (WDFW, Living with Wildlife), which ecosystems where bats thrive. In general calculates out to about 2,800 mosquitos bats use a variety of habitats both natu- per bat, per night! Colonies, typical ral and human constructed. of the Pacific Northwest, may contain many hundreds, or even thousands, This publication will help small wood- of bats. It is estimated that the pest land owners understand which bats live control services provided by bats save in Oregon and Washington forests, what farmers more than $3 billion annually. role these bats play, and their impor- A single bat colony can thus consume tance to forest ecosystems. We will ad- large numbers of insects that would dress threats to bats, how bats support otherwise damage or consume valuable forest ecosystem health, and how small plants, such as food sources or trees, or woodland owners can help promote bat bite us. Birds consume vast numbers Parastrellus hesperus habitat, and therefore, bat populations. Townsend big-eared bat Little brown bat Spotted bat Corynorhinus townsendii. Photo by Myotis lucifugus. Photo by Shawn Thomas Euderma maculatum Eliana Pool 1 Woodland Fish & Wildlife • 2019 Species Range Habitat Requirements Uses a variety of habitats ranging from forest to urban. Commonly found around water sources, Myotis Throughout in both hardwood and conifer forests, and using structures such as buildings, mines, and Little brown bat lucifugus OR/WA bridges. Large diameter snags (>16”) and trees with sloughing bark are important habitat com- ponents. Uses a variety of habitats usually in close proximity to a water source including hardwood and Myotis Throughout Yuma bat conifer forests, grasslands, shrub-steppe and deserts. Large diameter snags (>16”) and trees with yumanensis OR/WA sloughing bark are important habitat components. Long-eared Myotis Throughout Commonly uses rock outcrops and large diameter snags (>16”) within dense conifer forests. myotis evotis OR/WA Long-legged Myotis Throughout Found in conifer forests, deserts, dry rangelands and riparian areas. Large diameter snags (>16”) myotis volans OR/WA and trees with sloughing bark are important habitat components. Inhabits dry forests, shrub-steppe, arid-grasslands and deserts as well as coastal hardwood California Myotis Throughout and conifer forests, meadows, and riparian zones. Large diameter snags (>16”) and trees with myotis californicus OR/WA sloughing bark are important habitat components. Western Inhabits dry climates in conifer forests, deserts, shrublands, riparian areas and grasslands in Myotis East of Cascades small-footed relative proximity to rock features such as caves and cliffs. Large diameter snags (>16”) and trees ciliolabrum in OR and WA myotis with sloughing bark are important habitat components. Coastal WA Myotis Restricted to lower elevation coastal conifer forests where large trees, large diameter snags Keen's myotis (not found keenii (>16”), rock crevices and caves are present. in OR) Myotis Throughout Found in dry forests throughout the PNW utilizing large diameter snags (>16”), rock crevices, Fringed myotis thysanodes OR/WA caves, mines, buildings, bridges and green trees often near water. In western Oregon species is often associated with coniferous and deciduous forests. Utilizes Eptesicus Throughout areas above tree canopy, streams, canyons, and in forest transition areas such as along roads, in Big brown bat fuscus OR/WA clearings and along the forest edge to hunt. Also found in buildings, mines, and under bridges. Large diameter snags (>16”) and trees with sloughing bark are important habitat components. East of Cascades Antrozous Inhabits dry forests open oak and ponderosa and farmland. Also utilizes live trees, large diameter Pallid bat in OR/WA and in pallidus snags (>16”), rock crevices, mines, buildings, and bridges. SW OR Found in dry climates and areas where tall cliffs exist, open pine forests, and in conifer and aspen Euderma East of the Cas- Spotted bat forests. Utilizes riparian zones and meadows for foraging. Large diameter snags (>16”) and trees maculatum cades in OR/WA with sloughing bark are important habitat components. Corynorhi- Inhabits coastal and dry conifer forests, grasslands, and deserts; using caves, bridges, mines, Townsend's Throughout nus buildings, hollow trees, marshes, streams and riparian areas. Large diameter snags (>16”) and big-eared bat OR/WA townsendii trees with sloughing bark are important habitat components. Lasiurus Throughout Found at high elevations throughout a variety of habitats. Large diameter trees (>16”) with Hoary bat cinereus OR/WA sloughing bark are important habitat components. East of Cascades Parastrellus Found in lowland arid environments, especially deep canyons and in other rocky areas. Large Canyon Bat in OR and in hesperus diameter snags (>16”) and trees with sloughing bark are also important adjacent to these areas. SE WA Lasionycteris Throughout Occurs in structurally complex forest environments and associated riparian zones. Large Silver-haired bat noctivagans OR/WA diameter snags (>16”) and trees with sloughing bark are important habitat components. Southern OR Range extends as far north as Roseburg, OR. Species does not tend to hibernate, usually Brazilian Tadarida (not found seeking out sources of warmth during cold months. Uses hollow trees, caves, bridges, and free-tailed bat brasiliensis in WA) buildings. Large diameter snags (>16”) and trees with sloughing bark may also be important. 2 Woodland Fish & Wildlife • 2019 Bat Biology Day roosting Hoary bat Bats are nocturnal mammals with sur- Natural day roost sites include cracks prisingly long life spans and slow repro- and cavities in snags, under loose bark, ductive rates given their small size. Once hollow trees, caves and rock crevices. they make it through the juvenile stage, Manmade roosts are plentiful, such as bats are thought to usually live for 10 to under bridges, attics, under roofing, 20 years, and generally have only one or abandoned buildings and under shut- two young per year (BatCon.org). ters or eaves of buildings. During the day bats may experience a resting state Echolocation known as torpor, though sometimes Bats use echolocation to catch food. To they are observed foraging and drinking echolocate, bats send out sound waves water during the day or low light levels. from the mouth or nose. When the sound Essentially, torpor is a state of decreased waves hit an object, they produce echoes. physiological activity, usually by a re- The echo bounces off the object and returns duced body temperature and metabolic Aeorestes cinereus. Photo from USFS to the bats’ ears, allowing them to locate rate and is a period of time wherein the the position of the prey. They are the only bat roosts in order to conserve energy. torpor and has additional associations mammal that hunts at night while flying. Bats also utilize torpor during food with day length and hormone changes. shortages and bad weather. For some Many bat species found in Oregon and Nursery sites species they do this in medium-large Washington are known to hibernate, or Nursery sites, otherwise known as groups, for others this is a solitary go into a low-energy sleep state for an maternity colonies, are only occupied activity. It is important to note that day extended period of time during winter by breeding females and their young. roosting bats are easily disturbed, which months. This enables bats to survive Nursery sites are usually well protected, can be detrimental because this causes a periods of reduced food availability and disturbance free environments such as bat’s metabolic rate and body tempera- temperatures. During this time, bats tree crevices or
Recommended publications
  • Corynorhinus Townsendii): a Technical Conservation Assessment

    Corynorhinus Townsendii): a Technical Conservation Assessment

    Townsend’s Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 25, 2006 Jeffery C. Gruver1 and Douglas A. Keinath2 with life cycle model by Dave McDonald3 and Takeshi Ise3 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 2Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Old Biochemistry Bldg, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82070 3Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, P.O. Box 3166, Laramie, WY 82071 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Gruver, J.C. and D.A. Keinath (2006, October 25). Townsend’s Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/townsendsbigearedbat.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the modeling expertise of Dr. Dave McDonald and Takeshi Ise, who constructed the life-cycle analysis. Additional thanks are extended to the staff of the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database for technical assistance with GIS and general support. Finally, we extend sincere thanks to Gary Patton for his editorial guidance and patience. AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Jeff Gruver, formerly with the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the Biological Sciences program at the University of Calgary where he is investigating the physiological ecology of bats in northern arid climates. He has been involved in bat research for over 8 years in the Pacific Northwest, the Rocky Mountains, and the Badlands of southern Alberta. He earned a B.S. in Economics (1993) from Penn State University and an M.S.
  • Lasiurus Egregius (Peters, 1870) (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in Paraná State, Southern Brazil

    Lasiurus Egregius (Peters, 1870) (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in Paraná State, Southern Brazil

    15 6 NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 15 (6): 1099–1105 https://doi.org/10.15560/15.6.1099 First record of Lasiurus egregius (Peters, 1870) (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in Paraná state, southern Brazil Fernando Carvalho1, 2, Daniela Aparecida Savariz Bôlla3, Karolaine Porto Supi1, Luana da Silva Biz1, 2, Beatriz Fernandes Lima Luciano1, 2, 4, Jairo José Zocche2, 4 1 Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Laboratório de Zoologia e Ecologia de Vertebrados, Av. Universitária n.1105, Bairro Universitário, Criciúma, SC, CEP: 80806-000, Brazil. 2 Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Av. Universitária n.1105, Bairro Universitário, Criciúma, SC, CEP: 80806-000, Brazil. 3 National Institute for Amazonian Research (INPA), Post Graduation Program in Ecology, Av. André Araújo, n.2936, Bairro Petrópolis, Manaus, AM, CEP: 69.067-375, Brazil. 4 Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Laboratório de Ecologia de Paisagem e de Vertebrados Av. Universitária n.1105, Bairro Universitário, Criciúma, SC, CEP: 80806-000, Brazil. Corresponding author: Fernando Carvalho e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Lasiurus egregius (Peters, 1870) is an insectivorous bat species known from Central and South America. This species has few confirmed records throughout its distribution. Here we report the first record of L. egregius from the northern coast of Paraná state, southern Brazil. We captured a female individual of L. egregius using an ultrathin mist-net installed over a river knee, at Salto Morato Natural Reserve, municipality of Guaraqueçaba. This is the fourteenth locality with confirmed occurrence of L. egregius, being eight of them in Brazil. The knowledge on the bat fauna in Paraná has been increasing in recent decades, mainly due to the new studies in coast areas of this state.
  • Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections

    Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections

    Prepared by the USGS National Wildlife Health Center Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections Circular 1329 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover photo (D.G. Constantine) A Townsend’s big-eared bat. Bat Rabies and Other Lyssavirus Infections By Denny G. Constantine Edited by David S. Blehert Circular 1329 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Constantine, D.G., 2009, Bat rabies and other lyssavirus infections: Reston, Va., U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1329, 68 p. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Constantine, Denny G., 1925– Bat rabies and other lyssavirus infections / by Denny G. Constantine. p. cm. - - (Geological circular ; 1329) ISBN 978–1–4113–2259–2 1.
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats

    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats

    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
  • BAT-WATCHING SITES of TEXAS Welcome! Texas Happens to Be the Battiest State in the Country

    BAT-WATCHING SITES of TEXAS Welcome! Texas Happens to Be the Battiest State in the Country

    BAT-WATCHING SITES OF TEXAS Welcome! Texas happens to be the battiest state in the country. It is home to 32 of the 47 species of bats found in the United States. Not only does it hold the distinction of having the most kinds of bats, it also boasts the largest known bat colony in the world, Bracken Cave Preserve, near San Antonio, and the largest urban bat colony, Congress Avenue Bridge, in Austin. Visitors from around the world flock BAT ANATOMY to Texas to enjoy public bat-viewing at several locations throughout the state. This guide offers you a brief summary of what each site has to offer as well as directions and contact information. It also includes a list of the bat species currently known to occur within Texas at the end of this publication. Second Finger We encourage you to visit some of these amazing sites and experience the Third Finger wonder of a Texas bat emergence! Fourth Finger Thumb Fifth Finger A Year in the Life Knee of a Mexican Free-tailed Bat Upper Arm Foot Forearm Mexican free-tailed bats (also in mammary glands found under each Tail known as Brazilian free-tailed bats) of her wings. Wrist are the most common bat found The Mexican free-tailed bats’ milk is throughout Texas. In most parts of so rich that the pups grow fast and are Tail Membrane the state, Mexican free-tailed bats ready to fly within four to five weeks of Ear are migratory and spend the winters birth. It is estimated that baby Mexican in caves in Mexico.
  • Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants Will Be Assessed on Their Knowledge of Bats, With

    Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants Will Be Assessed on Their Knowledge of Bats, With

    Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants will be assessed on their knowledge of bats, with an emphasis on North American Bats, South American Microbats, and African MegaBats. A TEAM OF UP TO: 2 APPROXIMATE TIME: 50 minutes 2. EVENT PARAMETERS: a. Each team may bring one 2” or smaller three-ring binder, as measured by the interior diameter of the rings, containing information in any form and from any source. Sheet protectors, lamination, tabs and labels are permitted in the binder. b. If the event features a rotation through a series of stations where the participants interact with samples, specimens or displays; no material may be removed from the binder throughout the event. c. In addition to the binder, each team may bring one unmodified and unannotated copy of either the National Bat List or an Official State Bat list which does not have to be secured in the binder. 3. THE COMPETITION: a. The competition may be run as timed stations and/or as timed slides/PowerPoint presentation. b. Specimens/Pictures will be lettered or numbered at each station. The event may include preserved specimens, skeletal material, and slides or pictures of specimens. c. Each team will be given an answer sheet on which they will record answers to each question. d. No more than 50% of the competition will require giving common or scientific names. e. Participants should be able to do a basic identification to the level indicated on the Official List. States may have a modified or regional list. See your state website.
  • African Bat Conservation News Template

    African Bat Conservation News Template

    Volume 33 African Bat Conservation News November 2013 ISSN 1812-1268 © ECJ Seamark, 2009 (AfricanBats) © ECJ Seamark, 2007 (AfricanBats) Above: A Egyptian Fruit Bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) caught in the Pufuri area, Kruger National Park, South Africa. Inside this issue: Recent Literature 2 Conferences 2 Zoological Society of Southern Africa Conference 2 16th International Bat Research Conference 5 Published Books / Reports 16 Published Papers 16 Notice Board 26 Download and subscribe to African Bat Conservation News published by AfricanBats at: www.africanbats.org The views and opinions expressed in articles are no necessarily those of the editor or publisher. Articles and news items appearing in African Bat Conservation News may be reprinted, provided the author’s and newsletter reference are given. African Bat Conservation News November 2013 vol. 33 2 ISSN 1812-1268 Recent Literature Conference Zoological Society of Southern Africa 2013 Below are abstracts that are specifically related to African bat species. Papers The importance of ecology and physiology in a changing world: Wahlberg Epauletted Fruit Bat (Epomophorus wahlbergi) as an example Colleen T. Downs - School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Globally the biggest threats to mammal and bird populations in the short-term are human development, population growth, urbanisation, alien invasions and land transformation resulting in habitat loss for species. In addition climate change is another threat in the long- term. However, to assess how these threats impact on a species and how they may survive both ecological and physiological studies are required. The importance of interdisciplinary studies is highlighted using the example of Wahlberg’s epauletted fruit bat Epomophorus wahlbergi.
  • Lasiurus Borealis (Müller, 1776) Taxonomy Follows Simmons and Cirranello (2021) Call Shape

    Lasiurus Borealis (Müller, 1776) Taxonomy Follows Simmons and Cirranello (2021) Call Shape

    Guide for Acoustic Identification of Florida bats Family: Vespertilionidae Database species code Lasbor or Labo See glossary for explanation of codes Scientific name Lasiurus borealis (Müller, 1776) Taxonomy follows Simmons and Cirranello (2021) Call shape To view call graphics click on the camera icon on the right. You can then move through all images by using the left or right arrow keys. A left mouse click returns to the fact sheet. Typical North American Vespertilionid pulses with FM reversed J broadband pulses of short duration. However, distinctive for the genus Lasiurus the Fmin shifts up and down. Note that commute calls are longer duration, have a lower frequency and are narrow band. Vocal signature parameters Parameters N Min Max Mean St.Dev 10% 25% 75% 90% Dur 379 2.01 8.99 5.46 1.87 2.87 4.08 7.04 7.91 TBC 354 2.8 3255.4 316.7 394.7 69.4 105.5 341.7 761.8 Fmin 379 37.04 44.20 39.98 1.78 37.74 38.46 41.35 42.55 Fmax 379 39.80 81.63 55.87 8.90 44.15 49.08 61.54 67.80 BW 379 1.34 41.72 15.88 8.82 4.70 8.90 21.23 27.95 Fmean 379 39.02 48.96 44.03 2.62 40.36 41.89 46.16 47.40 Fk 379 37.74 49.69 42.57 2.44 39.41 40.61 44.20 45.98 FcH1 379 18.52 22.47 20.28 0.90 19.14 19.61 20.94 21.62 Fc 379 37.04 44.94 40.56 1.80 38.28 39.22 41.88 43.24 FcH3 379 55.56 67.41 60.84 2.71 57.42 58.83 62.82 64.86 Sc 379 -41.80 169.43 35.10 28.81 5.33 14.57 50.35 71.13 Pmc 379 1.70 107.80 37.87 22.28 10.66 20.35 50.40 68.92 Reported by Szewczak (2018) Lasbor Fc Fmax Fmin FmaxE dur uppr slp lwr slp slp @ Fc total slp Mean 40.4 67.6 40.2 43.8 6.8 10.0 2.0 0.6 4.4 Max 44.0 81.0 43.0 49.0 9.1 16.0 3.2 1.6 7.1 Min 37.0 54.0 37.0 39.0 4.6 4.4 0.7 -0.4 1.7 Source of acoustic data Chris Corben Known counties of distribution Alachua Lee Baker Leon Bay Levy Bradford Liberty Brevard Madison Broward Manatee Calhoun Marion Charlotte Martin Citrus Miami-Dade Clay Monroe Collier Nassau Columbia Okaloosa De Soto Okeechobee Dixie Orange Duval Osceola Escambia Palm Beach Flagler Pasco Franklin Pinellas Gadsden Polk Gilchrist Putnam Glades Santa Rosa Gulf Sarasota Hamilton Seminole Hardee St.
  • Patagonian Bats

    Patagonian Bats

    Mammalia 2020; 84(2): 150–161 Analía Laura Giménez* and Mauro Ignacio Schiaffini Patagonian bats: new size limits, southernmost localities and updated distribution for Lasiurus villosissimus and Myotis dinellii (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2019-0024 (i.e. intra and interspecific interactions) and abiotic Received March 10, 2019; accepted June 7, 2019; previously published factors (i.e. temperature, altitude, precipitation and pro- online July 16, 2019 ductivity), together with dispersal ability capacities and the evolutionary history of each lineage (Gaston 2003, Cox Abstract: Vespertilionid species are widely distributed and Moore 2005, Soberón and Peterson 2005). As abiotic in South America. They are highly diverse, with physio- factors are not evenly distributed in space or time, they logical and behavioral adaptations which allow them to shape the borders of species’ distributions trough extreme extend their distributions into temperate areas. In Patago- values (e.g. minimum or maximum temperatures, dry or nia, this family is represented by seven species in three humid areas), which in turn influence resource availabil- genera (Histiotus, Lasiurus and Myotis). In this study, we ity and impose limits to reproduction and survival (Mackey analyzed the distribution of two vespertilionid species, and Lindenmayer 2001, Gaston 2003). In this way, those Lasiurus villosissimus and Myotis dinellii, including new areas with more favorable abiotic (and biotic) conditions southernmost records, and their relationship with envi- will show the highest relative abundance, while records ronmental variables. Two different spatial scales were will become more scarce and more far away from each analyzed: a continental approach for species distribu- other toward the borders of a species’ distribution (Brown tion analyses (South America), and local trapping of bats 2003 and references therein).
  • Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

    Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

    THERYA, 2021, Vol. 12(2): 283-289 DOI:10.12933/therya-21-1117 ISSN 2007-3364 On the utility of taxonomy to reflect biodiversity: the example of Lasiurini (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) AMY B. BAIRD1, JANET K. BRAUN2, MARK D. ENGSTROM3, BURTON K. LIM3, MICHAEL A. MARES2, JOHN C. PATTON4, AND JOHN W. BICKHAM5 * 1 Department of Natural Sciences, University of Houston - Downtown, 77002, Houston. Texas, USA. Email: [email protected] (ABB). 2 Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, 73072, Norman. Okahoma, USA. Email: [email protected] (JKB) [email protected] (MAM). 3 Royal Ontario Museum, M5S 2C6, Toronto. Ontario, Canada. Email: [email protected] (BKL) [email protected] (MDE). 4 5000 Quartz Lane, 79707, Midland. Texas, USA. Email: [email protected] (JCP). 5 Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, 77843, College Station. Texas, USA. Email: [email protected] (JWB). *Corresponding author The taxonomic history of bats of the tribe Lasiurini (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) has undergone significant changes over time. Authors at different times have recognized various numbers of genera and subgenera within the tribe. The most recent proposed change to generic level taxonomy (that there should be three genera recognized instead of a single genus) has been debated in the literature. We reviewed papers that commented on the recent changes to lasiurine generic taxonomy, as well as those that have adopted the new taxonomy and the ones that have not. We also reviewed the relevant taxonomic literature from 1942 to the present that shows the fluid taxonomic history of these bats. The literature review shows that the recently proposed taxonomic change recognizing the three groups of lasiurine bats as distinct genera is the only taxonomy that differentiates the tribe from the genera.
  • Life History Account for Canyon

    Life History Account for Canyon

    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group CANYON BAT Parastrellus hesperus Family: VESPERTILIONIDAE Order: CHIROPTERA Class: MAMMALIA M031 Written by: J. Harris Reviewed by: P. Brown Edited by: D. Alley, R. Duke Updated by: CWHR Program Staff, July 2005 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The canyon bat (once known as the western pipistrelle) is a common to abundant resident of deserts, arid grasslands, and woodlands. In California, this species occurs in the Central Valley, foothills, and Coast Ranges from Tehama Co. to Mexico, and in the deserts from Alpine Co. to Mexico. Extreme eastern Modoc Co. is also inhabited. Scattered populations exist in Siskiyou, Lassen, and Trinity counties. Occupies all desert, brush, grassland, and woodland habitats up through mixed conifer forests. The most abundant bat in desert regions. Common in arid brushlands, grasslands, and woodlands, and uncommon in conifer forests. This species is a yearlong resident in California. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Feeds on a wide variety of flying insects, including moths, Diptera, Homoptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera, and Coleoptera. The primary food varies between studies (Ross 1967, Black 1974, Whitaker et al. 1981), but soft-bodied prey are the major foods. Flight is slow and fluttery. Feeds at low to moderate heights. Often found foraging over water, in rocky canyons, and along cliff faces. Cover: Roosts primarily in rock crevices, occasionally in mines and caves, and rarely in buildings. Suitable roosts are most often found in rocky canyons and cliffs. Reproduction: Born and reared singly, or in small maternity colonies in rock crevices.
  • The Evolution of Echolocation in Bats: a Comparative Approach

    The Evolution of Echolocation in Bats: a Comparative Approach

    The evolution of echolocation in bats: a comparative approach Alanna Collen A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from the Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London. November 2012 Declaration Declaration I, Alanna Collen (née Maltby), confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, this is indicated in the thesis, and below: Chapter 1 This chapter is published in the Handbook of Mammalian Vocalisations (Maltby, Jones, & Jones) as a first authored book chapter with Gareth Jones and Kate Jones. Gareth Jones provided the research for the genetics section, and both Kate Jones and Gareth Jones providing comments and edits. Chapter 2 The raw echolocation call recordings in EchoBank were largely made and contributed by members of the ‘Echolocation Call Consortium’ (see full list in Chapter 2). The R code for the diversity maps was provided by Kamran Safi. Custom adjustments were made to the computer program SonoBat by developer Joe Szewczak, Humboldt State University, in order to select echolocation calls for measurement. Chapter 3 The supertree construction process was carried out using Perl scripts developed and provided by Olaf Bininda-Emonds, University of Oldenburg, and the supertree was run and dated by Olaf Bininda-Emonds. The source trees for the Pteropodidae were collected by Imperial College London MSc student Christina Ravinet. Chapter 4 Rob Freckleton, University of Sheffield, and Luke Harmon, University of Idaho, helped with R code implementation. 2 Declaration Chapter 5 Luke Harmon, University of Idaho, helped with R code implementation. Chapter 6 Joseph W.