DOCSLIB.ORG

Boeing Field FAA - Office of Airports Report Date: 05/19/2017 SOURCE: CY 2015 FAA ENPLANEMENTS by INDIVIDUAL CARRIERS for CALENDAR YEAR 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boeing Field FAA - Office of Airports Report Date: 05/19/2017 SOURCE: CY 2015 FAA ENPLANEMENTS by INDIVIDUAL CARRIERS for CALENDAR YEAR 2015 Appendix One 2015 BFI ACAIS Report MASTER PLAN UPDATE King County International Airport/ Boeing Field FAA - Office Of Airports Report Date: 05/19/2017 SOURCE: CY 2015 FAA ENPLANEMENTS BY INDIVIDUAL CARRIERS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2015 Boeing Field/King County International (BFI) SEA Randall Berg 7277 Perimeter Road South, Seattle, WA 98108-3812 BFI SCHEDULE TYPE |- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENPLANEMENTS - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - | CARRIER NAME (CARRIER CODE) SCHEDULED NONSCHEDULED TOTAL ATCO - Nonscheduled/On-Demand Air Carriers, filing FAA Form 1800-31. Aero Jet Services LLC (J7EA) 0 29 29 Aurora Aviation Inc (GLRA) 0 36 36 Crow Executive Air, Inc. (DRUA) 0 15 15 KaiserAir, Inc. (COZA) 0 6 6 Priester Aviation LLC (PRIA) 0 4 4 Rite Bros Aviation, Inc. (RTEA) 0 296 296 Skybird Aviation, Inc. (AAWA) 0 16 16 ATCO Total: 0 402 402 CAC - Commuters or Small Certificated Air Carriers, filing T-100. Empire Airlines, Inc. (EM) 0 0 0 Kenmore Air Harbor, Inc. (KAH) 8,201 240 8,441 CAC Total: 8,201 240 8,441 CRAC - Large Certificated Air Carriers, filing T-100. Air Transport International Limited Liability Co (8C) 0 0 0 Alaska Airlines, Inc. (AS) 0 840 840 Allegiant Air LLC (G4) 0 50 50 American Airlines, Inc. (AA) 0 537 537 Ameristar Air Cargo, Inc. (AMQ) 0 0 0 Atlas Air, Inc. (5Y) 0 123 123 Avjet Corporation (0WQ) 0 64 64 Caribbean Sun Airlines, Inc. D/B/A World Atlantic Airlines 0 106 106 Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DL) 0 219 219 Falcon Air Express (FCQ) 0 1,310 1,310 Federal Express Corp (FX) 0 0 0 Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (HA) 0 129 129 Kaiserair, Inc. (1EQ) 0 58 58 Kalitta Air LLC (KAQ) 0 0 0 Kalitta Charters (KLQ) 0 0 0 Lynden Air Cargo LLC (L2) 0 0 0 Northern Air Cargo, Inc. (NC) 0 0 0 Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc. (SI) 0 2,562 2,562 Sun Country Airlines (SY) 0 123 123 Swift Air, Llc (09Q) 0 3,100 3,100 TATONDUK OUTFITTERS LIMITED D/B/A EVERTS AIR 0 0 0 US Airways, Inc. (US) 0 127 127 United Air Lines, Inc. (UA) 0 180 180 United Parcel Service Co (5X) 0 0 0 Varig Logistica S/A (ABX) 0 0 0 Vision Airlines (0JQ) 0 75 75 Selected Year: 2015, LOCID Code: BFI FAA - Office Of Airports Report Date: 05/19/2017 SOURCE: CY 2015 FAA ENPLANEMENTS BY INDIVIDUAL CARRIERS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2015 Boeing Field/King County International (BFI) SEA Randall Berg 7277 Perimeter Road South, Seattle, WA 98108-3812 BFI SCHEDULE TYPE |- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENPLANEMENTS - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - | CARRIER NAME (CARRIER CODE) SCHEDULED NONSCHEDULED TOTAL CRAC - Large Certificated Air Carriers, filing T-100. CRAC Total: 0 9,603 9,603 FFC - Foreign Air Carriers, filing T-100(f). Air Canada (AC) 0 50 50 Air Georgian (ZX#) 0 9 9 Chartright Air Inc. (13Q) 0 2 2 Global Jet Luxembourg, Sa (SVW) 0 2 2 Jazz Aviation Lp (QK#) 76 0 76 London Air Services Limited (14Q) 0 267 267 Prince Edward Air Ltd (PEQ) 0 0 0 TAG Aviation (0RQ) 0 3 3 Vistajet Limited (VJT) 0 10 10 Westjet (WS) 80 0 80 FFC Total: 156 343 499 Site Total: 8,357 10,588 18,945 Selected Year: 2015, LOCID Code: BFI Appendix Two FAA Forecast Approval Letter MASTER PLAN UPDATE King County International Airport/ Boeing Field U.S. Department Northwest Mountain Region of Transportation Seattle Airports District Office Federal Aviation 2200 S. 216th Street Administration Des Moines, WA 98198 April 10, 2018 Mr. Michael Colmant, A.A.E Interim Airport Director King County International Airport/Boeing Field 7277 Perimeter Road South Seattle, WA 98108 King County International Airport/Boeing Field (BFI) Aviation Forecast Approval Dear Mike: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Seattle Airports District Office has reviewed the aviation forecast for the King County International Airport/Boeing Field (BFI) Master Plan Update, submitted April 5, 2018. The FAA approves these forecasts for airport planning purposes, including for Airport Layout Plan (ALP) development. The FAA approval is based on the following: 1. The difference between the FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) and BFI’s forecast for passenger enplanements is not within the 10% and 15% allowances for the 5- and 10-year planning horizons for reasons contained within the forecast. We concur with these reasons and believe the differences have been resolved. 2. The difference between the TAF and BFI’s forecasts for commercial operations, total operations, and based aircraft are within the 10% and 15% allowances for the 5- and 10- year planning horizons. 3. The forecast is based on reasonable planning assumptions, current data and appropriate forecasting methodologies. Based on the approved forecast, the FAA also approves the existing and future critical aircraft typified by the Boeing 767 (RDC D-IV). The approval of the forecast and critical aircraft does not automatically constitute a commitment on the part of the Unites States to participate in any development recommended in the master plan or shown on the ALP. All future development will need to be justified by current activity levels at the time of proposed implementation. Further, the approved forecasts may be subject to additional analysis or the FAA may request a sensitivity analysis if this data is to be used for environmental or Part 150 noise planning purposes. If you have any questions about this forecast approval, please call me at (206) 231-4135. Sincerely, Jennifer I. Kandel Planner, FAA Seattle Airports District Office Appendix Three FAA ATC Waiver for Runway Centerline Seperation MASTER PLAN UPDATE King County International Airport/ Boeing Field Appendix Four Boeing 767-300 Aircraft Planning Manual F.A.R. Takeoff and Landing Length Charts MASTER PLAN UPDATE King County International Airport/ Boeing Field Appendix Five AC 150/5325-4B Runway Length Curves MASTER PLAN UPDATE King County International Airport/ Boeing Field 7/1/2005 AC 150/5325-4B Figure 2-1. Small Airplanes with Fewer than 10 Passenger Seats (Excludes Pilot and Co-pilot) Airport Elevation Example: (feet) 95 Percent of Fleet 100 Percent of Fleet Temperature (mean day max hot month): 59o F (15o C) Airport Elevation: Mean Sea Level Note: Dashed lines shown in the table are mid values of adjacent solid lines. Recommended Runway Length: For 95% = 2,700 feet (823 m) For 100% = 3,200 feet (975 m) Mean Daily Maximum Temperature of the Hottest Month of Year (Degrees F) 7 AC 150/5325-4B 7/1/2005 Figure 2-2. Small Airplanes Having 10 or More Passenger Seats (Excludes Pilot and Co-pilot) Representative Airplanes Runway Length Curves Raytheon B80 Queen Air Example: Temperature (mean day max hot month) 90o F (32o C) Raytheon E90 King Air Airport Elevation (msl) 1,000 feet (328 m) Raytheon B99 Airliner Recommended Runway Length 4,400 feet (1,341 m) Raytheon A100 King Air (Raytheon formerly Beech Note: For airport elevations above 3,000 feet (915 m), use the Aircraft) 100 percent of fleet grouping in figure 2-1. Britten-Norman 6000 Mark III-I Trilander Mitsubishi MU-2L Swearigen Merlin III-A Swearigen Merlin IV-A Swearigen Metro II Airport 5000 El e vati on (FT) 00 30 2000 00 10 l e Runway Length (FT) ev a L 4000 Se 3000 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Me an Daily Maximum Temperature of the Hottest Month of the Year (Degrees F) 8 Appendix Six Noise Technical Report for the Master Plan Update MASTER PLAN UPDATE King County International Airport/ Boeing Field King County International Airport/Boeing Field Noise Technical Report for the Master Plan Update Prepared for: Mead & Hunt, Inc. 1616 E 15th Street Tulsa, OK 74120 Prepared by: Clint Morrow Cynthia Gibbs Kurt Dunholter FINAL | August 4, 2020 20201 SW Birch Street, Suite 250 Newport Beach, CA 92660 T: 949-250-1222 | F: 949-250-1225 FINAL August 4, 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 Noise and Effects on People ......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Characteristics of Sound ............................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Propagation of Noise .................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Noise Metrics ................................................................................................................................ 4 3.0 Noise Regulations and Policies ..................................................................................................... 4 4.0 Existing and Future Noise Conditions ........................................................................................... 4 4.1 Existing Conditions Aircraft Activity .............................................................................................. 5 4.1.1 Aircraft Operations ................................................................................................................... 5 4.1.2 Fleet Mix.................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1.3 Departure Stage Length ............................................................................................................ 8 4.1.4 Runway Use ............................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.5 Flight Paths and Flight Path Utilization ..................................................................................... 9 4.2 Existing Conditions Noise Exposure .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comments to Paine Field Airport; They Have Been Noted
    SnohoniLt 1) • 17’ 1 J ,4$~ic~ Comments Countvkitport u amer len ~F Environtuental Assessinen~ ~~S4LW, LOft. 9~t7f NSCtEwJ cn~, cc~c i2~k ~u u~ COMMENTS: A~ 4o~i-c ~M ~—Tw*~ C Ia Dave Waggoner Cayla Morgan Director Environmental Protection Spedalist Snohomish County Airport Seattle Airports District Office Comments to 3220 100th Street Southwest or Federal Aviation Administration Everett, Washington 98204 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Barnard Dunkelberg >? Company Email. [email protected] Renton, Washington 98057-3356 BridgeNet International Email. [email protected] Synergy Consultants Gibson Traffic Consultants Thank You! D.1 Response to Comment Dear Jeanne and George Dalton: Thank you for your comments to Paine Field Airport; they have been noted. D.2 -Original Message— From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:40 PM To: Waggoner, Dave; Dolan, Bill; Ryk Dunkelberg; Ryan Hayes Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Roland. J.McKee@faa . gov Subject: Fw: Paine Field review Cayla Morgan Environmental Protection Specialist Seattle Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 425—227—2653 Forwarded by Cayla Morgan/ANM/FAA on 01/20/2010 04:38 PM I > From: I I > I > IStephen Dana <[email protected]> > > I To: I > I > Cayla Morgan/ANM/FAA@FAA I > > Date: I > > 101/20/2010 03:22 PM > > Subject: I > > IPaine Field review > D.3 January 19, 2010 Cayla Morgan Environmental Protection Specialist Seattle Airport District Office, FAA 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton, WA 98057 Ms. Morgan, The matter of commercial air service at Paine field is up for environmental review before your office in the coming weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVEMBER 3, 1980 I WASHINGTON, D.C
    THE whl7”c hci;Sg 1 TiiE OAiLY DIARY OF PREStDENt JIMMY CARSER 1 SF--.- ! Loc.xrIoN 3AsE &to.. Day. Yt.1 me. f THE WHITE HOUSE NOVEMBER 3, 1980 i WASHINGTON, D.C. TIX E DAY . -*: L 5:00 a.m. MONDAY I R I The President received a wake up call from the White House f signal board operator. I 5:18 i R The President talked on a conference line with: , I Edmund S. Muskie, Secretary of State I warren M. Christopher, Deputy Secretary of State 5 :*20 597 P‘ The President talked with his Press Secretary, Joseph L. "Jody" iI Powell. 5 = 31 5 = 35 P The President talked with Hamilton Jordan, Deputy Campaign Chairman, Carter Mondale Presidential Committee, Inc. 5:50 f The President went to the Oval Office. 5:50 5:51 P The President talked with Charles H. Kirbo, partner with King I t and Spalding law firm, Atlanta, Georgia. i 6~26 ; P The President telephoned the First Lady. The call was not I I completed. I I I 7:02 / 7:Og R 1 The President talked with the First Lady. I ; The President met with: 8:oo 1 8:18 Mr. Powell 8:oo 1 8:18 Gerald M. Rafshoon, President, Rafshoon Communications, ! I I I Washington, D.C. 8:oo 1 8:18 Patrick J. Caddell, President, Cambridge Survey, I I Cambridge, Massachusetts Mr. Kirbo Jack H. Watson, Jr., Chief of Staff Mr. Jordan a:18 The President went to the Cabinet Room. He was accompanied by: Mr. Watson Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington
    Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington Published Visual Flight Rules (VFR) routes for arrivals and departures. Project Background The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cancelled two existing VFR routes for aircraft landing and departing King County International Airport-Boeing Field (KBFI) and replaced them with newly defined routes (retaining some of the existing names). The term “routes” can best be described in this instance as a “set of pre-coordinated instructions” that is given to VFR pilots. The routes enhance safety by increasing separation between arrival and departure flows into KBFI, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (KSEA), and Renton Municipal Airport (KRNT). Purpose of Changes There have been Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) events involving VFR aircraft arriving and departing KBFI, and these routes are intended to reduce TCAS events and enhance safety. TCAS monitors the airspace around an aircraft for other aircraft equipped with proper equipment, independent of air traffic control, and warns pilots of the presence of other properly equipped aircraft in the immediate area. Project Description The project results in a change to past operating procedures by publishing several existing routes for VFR aircraft to use when arriving and departing from either runway configuration at KBFI. KBFI Airport Traffic Control Tower (BFI ATCT) now has the ability to assign published routes rather than issuing tailored instructions. The new VFR routes provide better predictability, enhance safety, and improve the segregation of aircraft arriving and departing KBFI. What Changed The new VFR routes follow pre-existing air traffic flight tracks that are assigned by BFI ATCT and no new areas will experience new air traffic overflights.
    [Show full text]
  • G410020002/A N/A Client Ref
    Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Amd. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur G410020002/A N/A Client Ref. No. - N° de réf. du client File No. - N° du dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME G410020002 G410020002 RETURN BIDS TO: Title – Sujet: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: PURCHASE OF AIR CARRIER FLIGHT MOVEMENT DATA AND AIR COMPANY PROFILE DATA Bids are to be submitted electronically Solicitation No. – N° de l’invitation Date by e-mail to the following addresses: G410020002 July 8, 2019 Client Reference No. – N° référence du client Attn : [email protected] GETS Reference No. – N° de reference de SEAG Bids will not be accepted by any File No. – N° de dossier CCC No. / N° CCC - FMS No. / N° VME other methods of delivery. G410020002 N/A Time Zone REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sollicitation Closes – L’invitation prend fin Fuseau horaire DEMANDE DE PROPOSITION at – à 02 :00 PM Eastern Standard on – le August 19, 2019 Time EST F.O.B. - F.A.B. Proposal To: Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Canadian Transportation Agency Address Inquiries to : - Adresser toutes questions à: Email: We hereby offer to sell to Her Majesty the Queen in right [email protected] of Canada, in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the Telephone No. –de téléphone : FAX No. – N° de FAX goods, services, and construction listed herein and on any Destination – of Goods, Services, and Construction: attached sheets at the price(s) set out thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • PAINE FIELD HANGAR UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024
    FOR SALE PAINE FIELD HANGAR UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024 CONTACT US KATRIN GIST CBRE, Inc. Associate 10885 NE 4th Street +1 206 947 1399 Suite 500 [email protected] Bellevue, Washington 98004 www.cbre.com/bellevue FOR SALE PAINE FIELD HANGAR HANGAR FEATURES PRICE: $680,000 This 5,625 sq. ft. aircraft hangar is an attractive option for those looking for an alternative to Boeing Field. Recently built in 2007, the hangar still feels new and offers a comfortable build-out that could be used for a variety of aviation purposes. Serving as a general aviation, industrial and commercial airport for the North Puget Sound region only 29 minutes north of Seattle, Paine Field provides a wide variety of aviation and industrial facilities, services and activities. It is ideal for the Northwest aircraft owner/operator. + 75 ft. x 75 ft. + 22 ft. clear height + 75 ft. wide hydroswing door + Radiant heat + Insulated + High bay halogen lighting + Sprinkler fire suppression system + Electrical system including 100 amps: − 110 and 220V + Security card gate access + Includes 350 sq. ft. office, bathroom and shower + Ground lease through May 31, 2041 with 15 year extension option UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024 BUILDING D SITE PLAN BUILDING D FLOOR PLAN UNIT D103 Not to scale FOR SALE UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST PAINE FIELD HANGAR Everett, Washington 98024 AERIAL MAP 9800 29th AVENUE WEST UNIT D103 © 2015 CBRE, Inc. The information contained in this document has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While CBRE, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Diagram Airport Diagram
    12096 EVERETT/ SNOHOMISH COUNTY (PAINE FIELD) (PAE) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-142 (FAA) EVERETT, WASHINGTON ATIS 128.65 BOEING PAINE TOWER PLANT 120.2 256.7 (East of RWY 16L-34R) 132.95 256.7 (West of RWY 16R-34L) GND CON 121.8 339.8 200 X CLNC DEL 220 126.75 AA ELEV 16R 563 A1 K1 162.0^ ILS ILS HOLD HOLD A 47^55'N BOEING 9010 X 150 A2 RAMP RWY 11-29 S-30 RWY 16L-34R S-12.5 A3 RWY 16R-34L NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV S-100, D-200, 2S-175 TWR CUSTOMS 2D-350, 2D/2D2-830 11 A4 787 B .A OUTER ELEV RAMP VAR 17.1^ E 561 NORTH 117.0^ C RAMP INNER C1 JANUARY 2010 D1 RAMP TERMINAL ELEV A5 16L D-3 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE D-3 4514 X 75 C 597 0.2^ W X G1 F1 A6 X D2 CENTRAL X G2 F2 HS 1 RAMP X D3 162.5^ X H D 3000 X 75 A X X X D40.9% UP G3 EAST WEST X X RAMP RAMP W3 X NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV FIRE F X STATION 297.0^ D5 FIELD K7 A7 E G4 ELEV F4 ELEV A8 SOUTH 29 600 606 RAMP G 342.5^ 47^54'N 342.0^ G5 A G6 HS 2 F6 A9 A 34R ELEV ELEV 578 596 A10 34L 400 X 220 HS 3 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus Regional Airport Authority
    COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY - PORT COLUMBUS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TRAFFIC REPORT June 2014 7/22/2014 Airline Enplaned Passengers Deplaned Passengers Enplaned Air Mail Deplaned Air Mail Enplaned Air Freight Deplaned Air Freight Landings Landed Weight Air Canada Express - Regional 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 Air Canada Express Totals 2,377 2,278 - - - - 81 2,745,900 AirTran 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 AirTran Totals 5,506 4,759 - - - - 59 6,136,000 American 21,754 22,200 - - - 306 174 22,210,000 Envoy Air** 22,559 22,530 - - 2 ,027 2 ,873 527 27,043,010 American Totals 44,313 44,730 - - 2,027 3,179 701 49,253,010 Delta 38,216 36,970 29,594 34,196 25,984 36,845 278 38,899,500 Delta Connection - ExpressJet 2,888 2,292 - - - - 55 3,709,300 Delta Connection - Chautauqua 15,614 14,959 - - 640 - 374 15,913,326 Delta Connection - Endeavor 4 ,777 4,943 - - - - 96 5,776,500 Delta Connection - GoJet 874 748 - - 33 - 21 1,407,000 Delta Connection - Shuttle America 6,440 7,877 - - 367 - 143 10,536,277 Delta Connection - SkyWest 198 142 - - - - 4 188,000 Delta Totals 69,007 67,931 29,594 34,196 27,024 36,845 971 76,429,903 Southwest 97,554 96,784 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 Southwest Totals 97,554 96,784 - - 218,777 315,938 830 103,146,000 United 3 ,411 3,370 13,718 6 ,423 1 ,294 8 ,738 30 3,990,274 United Express - ExpressJet 13,185 13,319 - - - - 303 13,256,765 United Express - Mesa 27 32 - - - - 1 67,000 United Express - Republic 4,790 5,133 - - - - 88 5,456,000 United Express - Shuttle America 9,825 9,076 - - - - 151 10,919,112
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Airline Information
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DIRECTIVE No. 328 Issue Date: 10-1-2018 Effective Date: 01-01-2019 Part: 241 Section: 04 AIR CARRIER GROUPINGS This Accounting and Reporting Directive updates the reporting groups for filing the Form 41 report during calendar year 2019 and replaces Reporting Directive No. 325. From our review, the reporting carrier groupings for the carriers below are updated as indicated: AIR CARRIER: NEW REPORTING GROUP: Aloha Air Cargo Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Express Jet Group III to Group II National Airlines Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Republic Group II to Group III SkyLease Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Swift Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Western Global Group I - $20 million to $100 million to Group II Carriers are grouped according to the operating revenue boundaries contained in Section 04 of Part 241. The current reporting levels are: Group III Over $1 billion; Group II Over $100 million to $1 billion; Group I $100 million and under, Subgroups: Group I - $20 million to $100 million, Group I - Under $20 million. Changes in the reporting groups are effective January 1, 2019. Any questions regarding the groupings should be directed to [email protected]. William Chadwick, Jr. Director Office of Airline Information Attachment ATTACHMENT PAGE 1 OF 3 GROUP III AIR CARRIERS - 17 CARRIER Alaska Airlines Allegiant Air American Airlines Atlas Air
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • March 9, 2021 by ELECTRONIC MAIL
    National Air Carrier Association 1735 North Lynn Street, Suite 105 Arlington, VA 22209 T: +1.703.358.8060 March 9, 2021 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honorable Steven M. Dickson Administrator Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Administrator Dickson, Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Air Carrier Association (NACA) and its member carriers1 have worked closely with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) staff on various operational challenges. One of the more unique issues related to the pandemic has been an increase in disruptive passengers and crewmember assaults, often resulting from disputes associated with mask requirements. In mid-January, in the wake of the insurrection at the United States Capitol Building, the FAA instituted a Special Enforcement Emphasis Program (SEEP) designed to provide a “zero-tolerance”, maximum penalty, for passengers who have caused significant disruptions in-flight, or committed a physical assault against a member of a flight crew while onboard an aircraft. This program is scheduled to end on March 30, 2021. Many in the airline industry thought the SEEP would bring a significant reduction in disruptive passenger incidents. However, since the SEEP’s inception, our Ultra Low- Cost Carriers (ULCCs) 2 have seen little to no decline in the number of daily disruptive passenger incidents. Sufficient time has not been provided for the impact of the program to be known to the traveling public. Without an understanding of the significant penalties associated with the SEEP, passenger behavior has not been altered by the program’s implementation and the risk to the crew has not been mitigated.
    [Show full text]