DOCSLIB.ORG

Comments to Paine Field Airport; They Have Been Noted

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SnohoniLt 1) • 17’ 1 J ,4$~ic~ Comments Countvkitport u amer len ~F Environtuental Assessinen~ ~~S4LW, LOft. 9~t7f NSCtEwJ cn~, cc~c i2~k ~u u~ COMMENTS: A~ 4o~i-c ~M ~—Tw*~ C Ia Dave Waggoner Cayla Morgan Director Environmental Protection Spedalist Snohomish County Airport Seattle Airports District Office Comments to 3220 100th Street Southwest or Federal Aviation Administration Everett, Washington 98204 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Barnard Dunkelberg >? Company Email. [email protected] Renton, Washington 98057-3356 BridgeNet International Email. [email protected] Synergy Consultants Gibson Traffic Consultants Thank You! D.1 Response to Comment Dear Jeanne and George Dalton: Thank you for your comments to Paine Field Airport; they have been noted. D.2 -Original Message— From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:40 PM To: Waggoner, Dave; Dolan, Bill; Ryk Dunkelberg; Ryan Hayes Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Roland. J.McKee@faa . gov Subject: Fw: Paine Field review Cayla Morgan Environmental Protection Specialist Seattle Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 425—227—2653 Forwarded by Cayla Morgan/ANM/FAA on 01/20/2010 04:38 PM I > From: I I > I > IStephen Dana <[email protected]> > > I To: I > I > Cayla Morgan/ANM/FAA@FAA I > > Date: I > > 101/20/2010 03:22 PM > > Subject: I > > IPaine Field review > D.3 January 19, 2010 Cayla Morgan Environmental Protection Specialist Seattle Airport District Office, FAA 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton, WA 98057 Ms. Morgan, The matter of commercial air service at Paine field is up for environmental review before your office in the coming weeks. There has already been considerable debate and data gathered regarding this subject, but collecting that data, considering issues and different points of view contribute to the decision making process at this regulatory level of government. I support the process completely. For me and my neighbors in and around Snohomish, the possibilities for commercial service at Paine Field are exciting and encouraging. Even though we have no illusion that service at Paine Field will be anything like Sea-Tac, the ability to have local service is encouraging. From a purely selfish point of view, being able to avoid the trip to Sea-Tac would be very desirable. My family currently uses commercial air transport a dozen or more times per year. In the scheme of things, that is not too much, but each time we have to make that journey we waste valuable time and resources. From an economic development point of view, commercial air service offers better marketability for our county and the businesses that have already made the commitment to locate here. Adding new businesses anywhere in the county improves the tax base and leverages the investment we already have made. Building on that foundation produces benefits for many. If only we were able measure lost opportunities. If this discussion were about whether we should be building a new airport on that same site in today’s world with today’s other conditions, we might be arguing for other locations as being more suitable. The fact is there is a world class publicly owned facility in place already. It was improved to accommodate jet aircraft of any size with public funds. This facility already has all the components we would require if we built a new airport on a different site. There is no doubt that encouraging the use of the airport for any purpose will create impacts. Adding business of any kind to the airport will require analysis to consider impacts to existing uses. Regardless of the specific business, off site impacts like traffic and noise will come to the area and the same process will apply when determining proper mitigation. When Snohomish County built the Solid Waste Transfer Station at Paine Field they created a stream of traffic and associated environmental impacts that may be more detrimental to the study area that increased air traffic. That project sailed through the review process without a problem. D.4 For surrounding residents, increased air traffic will certainly create some level of impact both in the air and on the ground. I don’t want to minimize their concerns. I would only suggest that when the Growth Management Act was adopted, it made provision for siting essential public facilities. The process of siting an essential public facility takes into consideration mitigation for impacts. Even though the airport already exists, the process of making it available for commercial air service may require consideration of specific measures to address impacts. As a former elected official from Snohomish, I understand the difficult position you find yourself in when you have to make the right decision for all of us taxpayers perhaps at the expense of those closest to the airport. I know you will consider all the input very carefully and make the right decision. Thank you for the opportunity to be heard. Sincerely, Stephen Dana D.5 Response to Comment Dear Stephen Dana: Thank you for your comments to the FAA; they have been noted. Please refer to the following general responses (see Appendix S) that apply to your comments. General Response 1-5: Mitigation General Response 6-1: Significance of Project Effects D.6 —Original Messag— From: [email protected] [nailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 1:12 PM To: Waggoner, Dave; Dolan, Bill; Ryk Dunkelberg; Ryan Hayes Cc: [email protected]; Caroline.CTR. [email protected]; Roland. J. McKee@faa . gov Subject: Fw: No additional flights at Paine Cayla Morgan Environmental Protection Specialist Seattle Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 425—227—2653 Forwarded by Cayla Morgan/ANM/FAA on 01/06/2010 12:11 PM “Robert Darrow” <[email protected]> wrote on 01/06/2010 09:01:39 AM: > [image removed] > > No additional flights at Paine > > Robert Darrow > > to: > > Cayla Morgan > > 01/06/2010 09:02 AM > > There seem to be some serious flaws in the EA, and the FAA seems to > be serving the developer’s lobbyist. The thousands of residents who > bought homes in the area based on no airport growth are going to be > very upset with the way this developer profit opportunity is being handled. > > Robert Darrow > Mukilteo D.7 Response to Comment Dear Robert Darrow: Thank you for your comments to the FAA; they have been noted. Please refer to the following general responses (see Appendix S) that apply to your comments. General Response 1-3: An independent investigation is needed because the FAA pushed the County to approve the terminal General Response 1-11: Flawed/inadequate/biased EA D.8 From: Waggoner, Dave [mailto:Dave.Waggoner©co.snohomish.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 11:26 AM To: Air Service Comments Subject: FW: Public Comment period on draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for Air Service at Paine Field extended to 1-29-10 From: [email protected] [mailto:chipandjoan©aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:15 AM To: Waggoner, Dave Subject: Re: Public Comment period on draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for Air Service at Paine Field extended to 1-29-10 I believe that the prospect of scheduled air service will enhance the utilization of the airport facility and I support air service to begin as soon as possible 244th ave se, woodinville Clifford W Davidson Original Message From: Waggoner, Dave <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Dec 21, 2009 3:07 pm Subject: FW: Public Comment period on draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for Air Service at Paine Field extended to 1-29-10 Attached find a notice of the extension of the public comment period on the draft EA for Air Service at Paine Field. Written comments will now be accepted until January 29, 2010. Dave Dave Waggoner Airport Director Snohomish County Airport--Paine Field 425-388-5100 Direct 425-508-7286 Mobile [email protected] www.painefield.com D.9 Response to Comment Dear Clifford Davidson: Thank you for your comments to Paine Field Airport; they have been noted. D.10 —Original Messag— From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 3:19 PM To: Waggoner, Dave; Dolan, Bill; Ryan Hayes; Ryk Dunkelberg Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Roland.J.McKee@faa. gov Subject: Fw: Paine Field air service Cayla Morgan Environmental Protection Specialist Seattle Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 425—227—2653 Forwarded by Cayla Morgan/ANM/FAA on 01/05/2010 02:17 PM [email protected] wrote on 01/05/2010 07:25:22 AN: > [image removed] > > Paine Field air service > > JDayRoch > > to: > > Cayla Morgan > > 01/05/2010 07:20 AN > > I support service at Paine Field. I live in Mill Creek and aircraft > from Paine Field fly over our neighborhood regularly. I do not > believe the addition of commercial flights will damage our area. In > fact, it will likely benefit the community. > > John Day > 2506 161st St Se > Mill Creek, WA D.11 Response to Comment Dear John Day: Thank you for your comments to the FAA; they have been noted. D.12 Page 1 of 1 Nimmy Dayalu to: Cayla Morgan 02/05/2010 04:18 PM Show Details Pulikeshi Dayalu 5223 169th PL SW Lynnwood WA 98037 425 787 9579 [email protected] February 5, 2010 Dear Sir/Madam, As a resident of Lynnwood WA, I oppose the conversion of Painefleld airport to a cmmercial status. I am not interested in environmental reports that highlite the safety aspects. We simply do not want to live near a commercial airport.
Recommended publications
  • NOVEMBER 3, 1980 I WASHINGTON, D.C

    NOVEMBER 3, 1980 I WASHINGTON, D.C

    THE whl7”c hci;Sg 1 TiiE OAiLY DIARY OF PREStDENt JIMMY CARSER 1 SF--.- ! Loc.xrIoN 3AsE &to.. Day. Yt.1 me. f THE WHITE HOUSE NOVEMBER 3, 1980 i WASHINGTON, D.C. TIX E DAY . -*: L 5:00 a.m. MONDAY I R I The President received a wake up call from the White House f signal board operator. I 5:18 i R The President talked on a conference line with: , I Edmund S. Muskie, Secretary of State I warren M. Christopher, Deputy Secretary of State 5 :*20 597 P‘ The President talked with his Press Secretary, Joseph L. "Jody" iI Powell. 5 = 31 5 = 35 P The President talked with Hamilton Jordan, Deputy Campaign Chairman, Carter Mondale Presidential Committee, Inc. 5:50 f The President went to the Oval Office. 5:50 5:51 P The President talked with Charles H. Kirbo, partner with King I t and Spalding law firm, Atlanta, Georgia. i 6~26 ; P The President telephoned the First Lady. The call was not I I completed. I I I 7:02 / 7:Og R 1 The President talked with the First Lady. I ; The President met with: 8:oo 1 8:18 Mr. Powell 8:oo 1 8:18 Gerald M. Rafshoon, President, Rafshoon Communications, ! I I I Washington, D.C. 8:oo 1 8:18 Patrick J. Caddell, President, Cambridge Survey, I I Cambridge, Massachusetts Mr. Kirbo Jack H. Watson, Jr., Chief of Staff Mr. Jordan a:18 The President went to the Cabinet Room. He was accompanied by: Mr. Watson Mr.
  • Office of Postsecondary Education Identifier Data

    Office of Postsecondary Education Identifier Data

    OPEID8 Name Address City State Zip IPED6 Web OPEID6 00100200 Alabama A & M University 4900 Meridian St Normal AL 35762 100654 www.aamu.edu/ 001002 00100300 Faulkner University 5345 Atlanta Hwy Montgomery AL 36109-3378 101189 www.faulkner.edu 001003 00100400 University of Montevallo Station 6001 Montevallo AL 35115 101709 www.montevallo.edu 001004 00100500 Alabama State University 915 S Jackson Street Montgomery AL 36104 100724 www.alasu.edu 001005 00100700 Central Alabama Community College 1675 Cherokee Road Alexander City AL 35010 100760 www.cacc.edu 001007 00100800 Athens State University 300 N Beaty St Athens AL 35611 100812 www.athens.edu 001008 00100900 Auburn University Main Campus Auburn University AL 36849 100858 www.auburn.edu 001009 00101200 Birmingham Southern College 900 Arkadelphia Road Birmingham AL 35254 100937 www.bsc.edu 001012 00101300 John C Calhoun State Community College 6250 U S Highway 31 N Tanner AL 35671 101514 www.calhoun.edu 001013 00101500 Enterprise State Community College 600 Plaza Drive Enterprise AL 36330-1300 101143 www.escc.edu 001015 00101600 University of North Alabama One Harrison Plaza Florence AL 35632-0001 101879 www.una.edu 001016 00101700 Gadsden State Community College 1001 George Wallace Dr Gadsden AL 35902-0227 101240 www.gadsdenstate.edu 001017 00101800 George C Wallace Community College - Dothan 1141 Wallace Drive Dothan AL 36303-9234 101286 www.wallace.edu 001018 00101900 Huntingdon College 1500 East Fairview Avenue Montgomery AL 36106-2148 101435 www.huntingdon.edu 001019 00102000 Jacksonville
  • Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington

    Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington

    Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington Published Visual Flight Rules (VFR) routes for arrivals and departures. Project Background The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cancelled two existing VFR routes for aircraft landing and departing King County International Airport-Boeing Field (KBFI) and replaced them with newly defined routes (retaining some of the existing names). The term “routes” can best be described in this instance as a “set of pre-coordinated instructions” that is given to VFR pilots. The routes enhance safety by increasing separation between arrival and departure flows into KBFI, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (KSEA), and Renton Municipal Airport (KRNT). Purpose of Changes There have been Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) events involving VFR aircraft arriving and departing KBFI, and these routes are intended to reduce TCAS events and enhance safety. TCAS monitors the airspace around an aircraft for other aircraft equipped with proper equipment, independent of air traffic control, and warns pilots of the presence of other properly equipped aircraft in the immediate area. Project Description The project results in a change to past operating procedures by publishing several existing routes for VFR aircraft to use when arriving and departing from either runway configuration at KBFI. KBFI Airport Traffic Control Tower (BFI ATCT) now has the ability to assign published routes rather than issuing tailored instructions. The new VFR routes provide better predictability, enhance safety, and improve the segregation of aircraft arriving and departing KBFI. What Changed The new VFR routes follow pre-existing air traffic flight tracks that are assigned by BFI ATCT and no new areas will experience new air traffic overflights.
  • CITY of EVERETT BICYCLE MAP O a CITY of EVERETT BICYCLE MAP T S LO U Spencer G H Island

    CITY of EVERETT BICYCLE MAP O a CITY of EVERETT BICYCLE MAP T S LO U Spencer G H Island

    Ebey Island S TE AM B CITY OF EVERETT BICYCLE MAP O A CITY OF EVERETT BICYCLE MAP T S LO U Spencer G H Island Smith Island 9 2 5 W L E A R Y G E O R S O H N A U LEGEND SE R UNIO N SLO UG H Bicycle repair sta�on J O Recreation* H N S S M O I N S GH T LOU H S L ** O Commuter D U D Jetty V G L H Island B 4 LEGION S (! N N N O H Parks PARK H O O G M S I S S I H E D R M R R I V E Central Business District O B E R G V (!3 H L R A O E Smith N Island E Everett Everett City Limits S IV Community B R L ! College N ( Points of Interest Y A 1 A R (! W D I0 Transit D T A OWER S O LANGUS W T R RIVERFRONT E B I PARK N a Police Stations V 10TH S T I0 c (!6 5 E College (! N I Station VE R A A T 12TH S M T 26TH ST (!7 W DOWNTOWNOY EVERETT CENTRAL BH USINESS DISTRICT (!2 EVERETT AVE 16TH ST City of Everett VE Oxidation Pond R 15 VE E (! 9 A Y A (! D V A D Biosolids B A H Pad G R U W BY O S L EW VE S I VE BA A T N E 19TH OL AD ST V South I O A KE I E V N Spencer M C D O M U E Island E G A Aeration R V Pond N M R OA N D LO A I HEW S U IT BR A T A VE A N KE N O S H N O A C (!14 M AR D I S R GR H U R M A 10 G I R (! V V Smith 11 E 2 R Island 12 (! 3RD ST E W (! (!16 WALL ST (!13 a !17 H ( G cC LOU S BO AT PACIFIC AVE S TEAM EVERETT AVE Y E T Y AVE V S A W A A T IL L HEW E A ITT AVE U R A L B N N I P D T E E ADW M A AT Everett T ER S V S R D LOU G US 2 M H £ E S ¤ R A 0 0.5 1 T PACIFIC AVEStation E Y H E T C B Miles S D N L U I0 !8 V O ( S L A D C M B S I F T .
  • Starbucks Hangar Facility OFFERING

    Starbucks Hangar Facility OFFERING

    Starbucks Hangar Facility OFFERING 6771 PERIMETER ROAD S, SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98108 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On behalf of Starbucks Corporation, Kinzer Real Estate (“KRES”) has been retained to present to qualified parties the opportunity to purchase its leasehold interest (the “Offering”) in its current corporate hangar facility at King County International Airport (“KCIA”). Due to its increased international business and corresponding increase in travel requirements, Starbucks required an expansion of its fleet and hangar facility that its current hangar site could not accommodate. In November 2011, Starbucks secured a new lease with King County at a parcel that will accommodate its future aviation requirements, and as a result is looking to dispose of its current hangar upon completion of its new hangar. The Offering provides the rare opportunity to secure long-term access to an existing, operational hangar facility at KCIA at a favorable economic cost to potential alternatives. The Offering consists of Starbucks’ leasehold interest in an aviation hangar facility located at 6771-A Perimeter Road at KCIA. The facility consists of 14,154 square feet of improvements upon 44,252 square feet of land owned by King County. The interest is secured via sublease with Master Lessee King County Jet Center (“KCJC”), which leases the land directly from KCIA. Starbucks’ lease term is coterminous with KCJC’s lease term. Starbucks’ sublease provides for extensions coterminous with extensions of the Master Lease. Although the Master Lease does not provide KCJC with specific renewal rights, KCIA customarily renews ground leases with responsible ground lessees that professionally maintain and operate existing hangar facilities.
  • SOUND TRANSIT MOTION NO. M99-75 Mukilteo Memorandum Of

    SOUND TRANSIT MOTION NO. M99-75 Mukilteo Memorandum Of

    SOUND TRANSIT MOTION NO. M99-75 Mukilteo Memorandum of Understanding Relating to the Federal Surplus Action of the Mukilteo Tank Farm Parcel BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS Meeting: Date: Type of Action: Staff Contact: Phone: Board of Directors 10/28/99 Discussion/Possible Action Paul Price 398-5111 Barry Hennelly 689-4925 ACTION: Motion No. M99-75 would authorize the Executive Director to execute a Memorandum of Understanding establishing cooperation between Sound Transit, Port of Everett, City of Mukilteo, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and City of Everett for the acquisition of the Mukilteo Tank Farm property from the United States Air Force through the Department of Defense surplus property process. BACKGROUND: Sound Move calls for Sounder commuter rail to serve the City of Mukilteo as part of the Everett-to­ Seattle project. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) allows Sound Transit to participate in a process whereby the federal government will surplus property (the Mukilteo Tank Farm) to the Port of Everett, WSDOT Ferries, Sound Transit and cities of Mukilteo and Everett. The Port of Everett is the lead applicant. The Mukilteo tank farm is a former fuel tank farm site, covering approximately 22 acres of the City of Mukilteo's waterfront. This property is adjacent to Sounder's preferred Mukilteo station location. The property would be used to provide land for beneficial public uses on Mukilteo's waterfront. Sound Transit would be allocated a portion of land sufficient to support Sounder Commuter Rail needs at the Mukilteo Station. Opportunities identified for consideration by the parties of this MOU may include: 1.
  • Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study Next Steps

    Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study Next Steps

    Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study Next Steps DAVID FLECKENSTEIN, AVIATION DIRECTOR Washington State Transportation Commission Meeting March 16, 2021 Planning for the Next Aviation Revolution • Electric aircraft are flying today and new companies are entering the market every day – Approximately 215 models under development • WSDOT completed a one year consultant led study on the potential impacts of electric aircraft for Washington State in November 2020 • This technology has the potential to open up new markets for air travel while reducing greenhouse gas emissions • Planning for implementation of electric aviation is key to successful adoption 2 Electric Aviation in Washington Washington State could become the epicenter for electric aircraft • Development • magniX, headquartered in Redmond, is developing the next generation of aircraft propulsion with its electric engines • Testing • AeroTEC is currently flight testing a Cessna Caravan converted to electric propulsion with a magniX engine at Grant County International Airport in Moses Lake • Manufacturing • Recently announced that Eviation plans to assemble the Alice at Arlington Municipal Airport o Alice utilizes the magniX engines 3 Washington Electric Aircraft Feasibility Study - Study Areas of Emphasis • Identification of current and projected airport infrastructure improvement needs to accommodate electric aircraft • Evaluation of projected economic impact resulting from increased access to air transportation • Demand forecasting for electric propulsion regional passenger air
  • PAINE FIELD HANGAR UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024

    PAINE FIELD HANGAR UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024

    FOR SALE PAINE FIELD HANGAR UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024 CONTACT US KATRIN GIST CBRE, Inc. Associate 10885 NE 4th Street +1 206 947 1399 Suite 500 [email protected] Bellevue, Washington 98004 www.cbre.com/bellevue FOR SALE PAINE FIELD HANGAR HANGAR FEATURES PRICE: $680,000 This 5,625 sq. ft. aircraft hangar is an attractive option for those looking for an alternative to Boeing Field. Recently built in 2007, the hangar still feels new and offers a comfortable build-out that could be used for a variety of aviation purposes. Serving as a general aviation, industrial and commercial airport for the North Puget Sound region only 29 minutes north of Seattle, Paine Field provides a wide variety of aviation and industrial facilities, services and activities. It is ideal for the Northwest aircraft owner/operator. + 75 ft. x 75 ft. + 22 ft. clear height + 75 ft. wide hydroswing door + Radiant heat + Insulated + High bay halogen lighting + Sprinkler fire suppression system + Electrical system including 100 amps: − 110 and 220V + Security card gate access + Includes 350 sq. ft. office, bathroom and shower + Ground lease through May 31, 2041 with 15 year extension option UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST Everett, Washington 98024 BUILDING D SITE PLAN BUILDING D FLOOR PLAN UNIT D103 Not to scale FOR SALE UNIT D103 9800 29TH AVENUE WEST PAINE FIELD HANGAR Everett, Washington 98024 AERIAL MAP 9800 29th AVENUE WEST UNIT D103 © 2015 CBRE, Inc. The information contained in this document has been obtained from sources believed reliable. While CBRE, Inc.
  • Airport Diagram Airport Diagram

    Airport Diagram Airport Diagram

    12096 EVERETT/ SNOHOMISH COUNTY (PAINE FIELD) (PAE) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-142 (FAA) EVERETT, WASHINGTON ATIS 128.65 BOEING PAINE TOWER PLANT 120.2 256.7 (East of RWY 16L-34R) 132.95 256.7 (West of RWY 16R-34L) GND CON 121.8 339.8 200 X CLNC DEL 220 126.75 AA ELEV 16R 563 A1 K1 162.0^ ILS ILS HOLD HOLD A 47^55'N BOEING 9010 X 150 A2 RAMP RWY 11-29 S-30 RWY 16L-34R S-12.5 A3 RWY 16R-34L NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV S-100, D-200, 2S-175 TWR CUSTOMS 2D-350, 2D/2D2-830 11 A4 787 B .A OUTER ELEV RAMP VAR 17.1^ E 561 NORTH 117.0^ C RAMP INNER C1 JANUARY 2010 D1 RAMP TERMINAL ELEV A5 16L D-3 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE D-3 4514 X 75 C 597 0.2^ W X G1 F1 A6 X D2 CENTRAL X G2 F2 HS 1 RAMP X D3 162.5^ X H D 3000 X 75 A X X X D40.9% UP G3 EAST WEST X X RAMP RAMP W3 X NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV FIRE F X STATION 297.0^ D5 FIELD K7 A7 E G4 ELEV F4 ELEV A8 SOUTH 29 600 606 RAMP G 342.5^ 47^54'N 342.0^ G5 A G6 HS 2 F6 A9 A 34R ELEV ELEV 578 596 A10 34L 400 X 220 HS 3 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED.
  • Snohomish County, Washington State

    Snohomish County, Washington State

    Be Here Snohomish County, Washington State Sophisticated research and manufacturing technologies with proximity to a major urban center. We work for business, yours should Be Here. ADVOCATE • DEVELOP • CONNECT CENTER OF INNOVATION Our diverse industrial base, technological prowess, and strategic location Snohomish position Snohomish County at the center of innovation. County Global Center for Aerospace and Advanced Manufacturing Snohomish County is home to Boeing Commercial Airplanes, their new $1 billion Composite Wing Center, and 200+ companies that help produce 747, 767, 777/X, and 787 aircraft. Key companies in Snohomish County include Crane, Korry Seattle, WA Electronics, MTorres, Collins Aerospace, Senior plc, Panasonic and Safran. Designated by the State as the Center of its Medical Device Industry Two international leaders in ultrasound, Philips and Fujifilm Sonosite, have headquarters and manufacturing here. In addition to devices, our life science cluster includes biopharmaceutical firms AGC Biologics, Seattle Genetics and Juno Therapeutics. Providence Regional Medical Center Everett gives access to 1 in 5 Jobs clinical trial opportunities at facilities throughout their 50 hospital system. in Snohomish County are associated with manufacturing Snohomish County Attracts Tech and Creative Companies Fluke Corporation (and its Fortune 500 parent, Fortive) have their headquarters and operations here, as do Zumiez (retail/clothing), Premera Blue Cross (insurance), and Funko (toys). T-Mobile, Google, Amazon and AT&T all have a significant presence as well. Microsoft, Expedia, Facebook, Nintendo, Big Fish Games and Apple are in the region. WORKFORCE TAXES & Snohomish County has the highest concentration of advanced INCENTIVES manufacturing jobs west of the Rocky Mountains. Manufacturing is 20% of our county workforce; twice the State average.
  • Sound Transit Climate Risk Reduction Project, F T a Report Number 0075

    Sound Transit Climate Risk Reduction Project, F T a Report Number 0075

    Sound Transit Climate Risk Reduction Project SEPTEMBER 2013 FTA Report No. 0075 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Lara Whitely Binder, Ingrid Tohver The Climate Impacts Group College of the Environment University of Washington Amy Shatzkin Sound Transit Amy K. Snover The Climate Impacts Group College of the Environment University of Washington COVER PHOTO Photo courtesy of Sound Transit, © 2008 DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Sound Transit Climate Risk Reduction Project SEPTEMBER 2013 FTA Report No. 0075 PREPARED BY Lara Whitely Binder, Ingrid Tohver The Climate Impacts Group College of the Environment University of Washington Amy Shatzkin Sound Transit Amy K. Snover The Climate Impacts Group College of the Environment University of Washington SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Budget and Policy U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE http://www.fta.dot.gov/research Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
  • Going to Boeing

    Going to Boeing

    MUKILTEO 128TH ST 128TH 99 124TH ST 124TH D t f Swi R E K I N A T L E R R E U D R V R E K A L E R 35TH AVE 35TH T L N I B E C R E V L I S 116TH ST 116TH S N A H 115TH AVE 2ND A T R R B O A U R I P 19TH AVE ST 112TH O L 8 I N 110TH ST 110TH MUKILTEO SPEEDWAY MUKILTEO 4TH AVE 4TH T E Modification Center Modification EVERGREEN WAY EVERGREEN B Pointe Harbour (includes times) (includes Boeing Everett Boeing L 952 V Boeing D D 2 7 12 17 29 17 12 7 2 R R 12 Everett Transit Everett E M M A transit Public I EVERETT MALL WAY MALL EVERETT Connecting Routes: Connecting I R 100TH ST 100TH R 12 FIELD A P P 100TH MALL STATION MALL L 100TH ST 100TH O - R PAINE HOLLY DR HOLLY L L 12 T E R 27TH AVE 27TH D 7THAVE W Everett Mall Everett O Bomarc Gate E-77 Gate N L F 8 94TH ST 94TH Bicycle Bomarc M E G 12 92ND ST 92ND 40-201 Blvd Seaway & St 75th 5TH AVE 5TH L Activity Center H Flight N1 Rd Casino & Rd Airport K Future of Future J CASINO RD CASINO 40-41 K 40-202 12 3 Casino Rd & Airport Rd Airport & Rd Casino J I shuttle Boeing 526 5 84TH ST 84TH Seaway Blvd & Fluke & Blvd Seaway I 12 , 8 3, to Swift N2 526 Connection: A N6 BEVERLYLN 12 80TH ST 80TH Gate E-68 Gate H BOEING 70 8 B D N 40-04 W7 40-02 N7 Visitor Lobby Gate E-67 Gate t f Swi N8 40-88 E1 G 8 N3 N4 N5 C 280 7 5T via routes L 76TH ST 76TH L H ST SW 75TH ST 75TH C 94th St & Airport Rd Airport & St 94th From F S 277 40-92 B I to 8 to Swift E D V 3 Mukilteo 40-87 E Connection: 48TH 40-10 Airport Rd & 94th St 94th & Rd Airport R PERIMETER RD PERIMETER M E 247 W6 D S 40-56 40-58 40-86 - 40-03 40-01 40-05