DOCSLIB.ORG

Unprecedented Financial Performance Annual Report, 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unprecedented Financial Performance Annual Report, 2018 TIME OF RESULTS Annual report 2018 Limitation of liability concerning statements JSC OGK-2 containing forecasts for future events This 2018 annual report (hereinafter referred to as the “Annual Report”) has been prepared using information Annual report 2018 available to Joint Stock Company “Second Wholesale Power Market Generating Company” (hereinafter, OGK-2, or the Company) at the moment of its preparation. The OGK-2 branches are also referred to as: Adlerskaya TPP, Groznenskaya TPP, Kirishskaya GRES, Krasnoyarskaya GRES, Novocherkasskaya GRES, Pskovskaya GRES, Ryazan- skaya GRES, Serovskaya GRES, Stavropolskaya GRES, Surgutskaya GRES-1, Troitskaya GRES, Cherepovetskaya GRES. Some statements included in this Annual Report of the Company are statements including forecasts for future events. Words such as “plans”, “will be”, “expected”, “will take place”, “estimates”, “will total”, “will occur”, and the like are forecasting by nature. Investors should not fully rely on the estimates and forecasts as they to imply a possible contradiction to reality. For this reason, the Company warns that the actual results or course of any events may significantly differ from forecast statements included in this annual report. Except as otherwise set forth in the applicable laws, the Company does not undertake to revise or confirm any expectations and estimates or publish updates and changes of forecast statements of the annual report resulting from any subsequent events or availability of new information. Information about the Company’s management staff is provided pursuant to Federal Law No. 152-FZ On Personal Data dated July 27, 2006. Table of Contents ADDRESS BY CHAIRMANOF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 5. RISK MANAGEMENT . .90 OF JSC OGK-2, DIRECTOR GENERAL 5.1. Corporate Risk Management System . .92 OF GAZPROM ENERGOHOLDING LLC . 6 5.2. OGK-2 Risks and Their Importance . 95 ADDRESS BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF JSC OGK-2 . 7 6. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . .100 1. INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY . 16 6.1. Principles of Corporate Governance . 103 1.1. Key Events . .18 6.2. OGK-2 Corporate Governance Improvements in 2018 and Plans for 1.2. Business Model . .20 2019 105 1.4. Organizational Structure . 24 6.3. Assessment of Compliance with the Corporate Governance Principles 105 1.5. Industry Overview . 26 6.4. Corporate Governance Structure . .107 1.6. Competitive Overview . .35 6.5. Remuneration and Incentives . .132 2. DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES . .42 6.6. Conflict of Interest Prevention and Settlement Policy . 135 2.1. Company’s Mission and Development Priorities . .44 6.7. Anticorruption Policy . 135 2.2. Facility Modernization Prospects for 2022 to 2031 . 49 7. SHAREHOLDER VALUE GENERATION . 136 2.3. Project Efficiency . 49 2.4. Key Performance Indicators . 50 LIST OF ANNEXES . 146 2.5. Investment Program . 52 1. Additional statistics data . .147 2.6. Innovative Development . 53 2. Financial Statements of OGK-2 Group for 2018 According to IFRS . 158 2.7. Information Technology . 53 3. COMPANY’S PERFORMANCE . 54 3.1. Operating indicators . 56 3.2. Financial results (IFRS) . 62 3.3. Financial results (RAS) . 68 4. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT . .70 4.1. Corporate values . 72 4.2. Stakeholders . 73 4.3. Approaches to Sustainable Development Management . 75 4.4. Environmental Protection . 77 4.5. Human Capital . 81 4.6. Social Partnership . 85 4.7. Supply Chain . 86 4.8. Relations with Suppliers . 89 Address by Chairman of the Board of Directors Address by the Managing Director of JSC OGK-2, Director General of Gazprom of JSC OGK-2 Energoholding LLC It is JSC OGK-2 that shall meet the investment Dear shareholders, obligations of Group Gazprom Energoholding under the CSA Program. The construction of the first unit We are glad to present the Company’s 2018 Annual at the Program’s last facility, Groznenskaya TPP, Report. was completed in 2018. The power plant will be fully launched in 2019 as the second unit is commissioned. The Company’s managers seek to turn the entire When constructing the station, emphasis was made staff’s efforts into an ever more impactful factor of on implementing process systems and kits from production performance and further development. Russian manufacturers. Those include relay protection and automation systems, dry fan cooling towers, The Company’s last year was marked by significant flue-gas stacks with emission monitoring systems, gas progress in the attainment of all strategic goals. preparation and chemical water treatment facilities, What the Company has always sought are highly various electrotechnical elements of power distribu- reliable power-plant operations, search for, and tion packages, etc. Involvement of, and support from, furtherance of, new points of growth, better capi- Russian manufacturers helped reduce the costs of talization and profitability. The steps the Company investment projects as well as the operating costs. takes are to improve its investment attractiveness and to ensure long-term sustainable growth. Groznenskaya TPP will cover the power deficit in the Chechen Republic and significantly reduce the power Decent results are already at hand, but it does not deficit at maximum load to stabilize the operations stop there. What was achieved over the reporting in the South East part of the Southern United Power year now enables us to implement new promising System (UPS). projects that will define the Company’s future and help consolidate its ranking as one of Russia’s Dear shareholders, The Company seeks to further modernize its equip- major power-generating companies. ment and to improving its operational efficiency. In June 2018, the Board of Directors of PJSC Gazprom Systematic development and better corporate approved the Electric Power Industry Strategy for Fitch and RAEX ranked the Company as one of Rus- governance, as well as constructive feedback from 23.4% of power was generated in 2018–2027. The Strategy sets forth the key goal sia’s major electric power companies, which confirmed shareholders have always been in the focus of the for the industry, which is to keep the profits growing its favorable standings as of 2018. Company. 2018 by the units commissioned stably while reliably providing power to consumers. To accomplish this, the Group’s companies will continue The Company continues to take every effort to reduce We are currently taking every effort to further devel- under Capacity Supply Agree- to pursue their comprehensive efforts, which include environmental impact. Prioritizing the use of state- op and implement digital technologies. Pursuant ments, an increase from 16.4% further modernization of equipment coupled with the of-the-art equipment helped JSC OGK-2 considerably to the digitalization plans, the Company trains its decommissioning of inefficient capacities. improve its environmental performance. staff to improve the power plant performance and of 2017. reliability, to enhance the occupational safety, and to 2018 saw record-breaking financial indicators from Dear shareholders! get higher-quality repair scheduling and procedures JSC OGK-2. The Company’s net profit exceeded in place. 11 billion rubles, which is a 67% increase YoY. This Gazprom Energoholding Group seeks sustainable and was mostly attributable to the attained reduction in efficient development of JSC OGK-2 in the interests of Most of all, the managers seek to reinforce the operating costs, which was partly thanks to improving all shareholders. I am sure that the managers’ and the attained financial and operating performance, to the operational efficiency by optimizing the “older” Board of Directors’ joint shareholder-supported efforts pursue the Company’s technological furtherance, capacities. 23.4% of power was generated in 2018 will further contribute to the Company’s success and and to make it even more attractive for investors. by the units commissioned under Capacity Supply rising margin of profits. Agreements, an increase from 16.4% of 2017. Artyom Semikolenov Denis Fedorov *In accordance with Russian accounting standards 6 JSC OGK-2 annual report 2018 Time of results 7 Information Development Priorities Company’s Performance Sustainable Risk Management Corporate Governance Shareholder Value Generation Annexes About the Company Development BREAKING THE RECORDS CSA program completion, cumulative total, % 100.0 91.8 91.8 95.9 69.3 MW 52.3 4,220 42.7 42.7 of new capacities 27.7 commissioned since 9.5 Groznenskaya TPP 2010 under the CSA 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 planned Period of capacity supply under CSA to newly constructed and modernized facilities Thanks to the CSA, it was Since 2010, the Company has possible to increase the commissioned 4,220 MW in new Ryazanskaya GRES (CCGT-420) capacities under its New Facilities Ryazanskaya GRES (STU-330) level of safety and reliability Construction and Commissioning Kirishskaya GRES (CCGT-800) of production, which is one Programs as part of the Capacity Supply Adlerskaya TPP (CCGT-180) Agreements (“the CSA”). The last facility Cherepovetskaya GRES (CCGT-420) of the main priorities of the to be commissioned under the CSA Serovskaya GRES (CCGT-420) Company’s development. program is the 180-MW second unit at Novocherkasskaya GRES (STU-330) Groznenskaya TPP being constructed Troitskaya GRES (STU-660) by the Gazprom Group; the unit is to be Groznenskaya TPP (CCGT-180) commissioned in 2019. 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 8 JSC OGK-2 Annual report 2018 Time of results 9 NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR NEW OPPORTUNITIES Share of CCGT in the total installed capacity of OGK-2 18,95518,998 18,828 18,999 18,422 18,088 18,024 17,869 17,857 17,995 14.9% 0.0% Adlerskaya TPP 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019,план Total installed capacity of OGK-2, MW Share of CCGT in the total installed capacity of OGK-2, % Efficiency As a part of the CSA Share of new CCGT program, 6 combined-cycle in installed capacity in power generation in total revenue in marginal income Modern CCGT 53% gas-turbine units (CCGTs) have been installed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I
    www.ssoar.info Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., & Frizina, I. (2015). Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 3, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51391-6 Economic and geographical development of the Russian Northwest ECONOMIC AND GEOGRAPHICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN NORTHWEST The so-called “compression” of social SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC and economic space has been the subject of SPACE COMPRESSION quite a few studies in the past decades. There are two principle types of compres- IN BORDER AREAS: sion: communicative, that is, associated THE CASE with the development of transport and in- OF THE NORTHWESTERN formation systems, and physical, mani- FEDERAL DISTRICT fested in the rapid decrease of the number of new territories to explore. While physi- cal and communicative compression are in- terrelated, they have different spatial ex- * pressions depending on geographical con- E.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialised Asset Management
    specialised research and investment group Russian Power: The Greatest Sector Reform on Earth www.sprin-g.com November 2010 specialised research and investment group Specialised Research and Investment Group (SPRING) Manage Investments in Russian Utilities: - HH Generation - #1 among EM funds (12 Months Return)* #2 among EM funds (Monthly return)** David Herne - Portfolio Manager Previous positions: Member, Board of Directors - Unified Energy Systems, Federal Grid Company, RusHydro, TGK-1, TGK-2, TGK-4, OGK-3, OGK-5, System Operator, Aeroflot, etc. (2000-2008) Chairman, Committee for Strategy and Reform - Unified Energy Systems (2001-2008) Boston Consulting Group, Credit Suisse First Boston, Brunswick. * Top 10 (by 12 Months Return) Emerging Markets (E. Europe/CIS) funds in the world by BarclayHedge as of 30 September 2010 ** Top 10 (by Monthly Return) Emerging Markets (E. Europe/CIS) funds in the world by BarclayHedge as of 31 August 2010 2 specialised research and investment group Russian power sector reform: Privatization Pre-Reform Post-Reform Government Government 52% 1 RusHydro 1 FSK RAO ES RAO UES 58% 79% hydro generation HV distribution 53% Far East Holding control control Independent energos 53% 1 MRSK Holding 14 TGKs 0% (Bashkir, Novosibirsk, ~72 energos 0% generation (CHP) generation Irkutsk, Tat) 35 federal plants transmission thermal 11 MRSK distribution 51% hydro LV distribution 0% ~72 SupplyCos supply 6 OGKs other 0% generation 45% InterRAO 0% ~100 RepairCos Source: UES, Companies Data, SPRING research 3 specialised research
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Without Borders
    2011 GENERATING ASSETS 27 THERMAL POWER PLANTS, 2 HYDROPOWER PLANTS AND 1 WIND FARM IN THE MANAGEMENT INSTALLED CAPACITY 28.2 GW (+45.8%) SHARE IN THE TOTAL INSTALLED CAPACITY OF RUSSIA 10.2% GENERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER 116.9BN KW*H (+37.3%) BOILER HEAT THERMAL POWER 19.8M GCAL (+0.5%) POWER SUPPLY ASSETS ENERGY POWER SUPPLY ASSETS ENERGY SALES VOLUME AT THE RETAIL MARKET 143.1BN KW*H (SHARE AT THE RF MARKET 14.02%) POWER GRID ASSETS TOTAL LENGTH OF POWER TRANSMISSION LINES ABROAD 34265 KM (+1.1%) ELECTRICITY EXPORT AND IMPORT EXPORT VOLUME 22.7BN KW*H (+21.9%) (INCLUDING AZERBAIJAN +148.1% BELARUS +10774.7% GEORGIA +111.2% KAZAKHSTAN +60.5% CHINA +26.0% LITHUANIA +8.6% MONGOLIA +23.2% SOUTH OSSETIA +11.7% IMPORT VOLUME +17.2% (INCLUDING AZERBAIJAN +93.2% KAZAKHSTAN +58.0%) FINANCIAL INDICATORS REVENUE 536.2BN RUB (+15.5%) EBITDA 41.7BN RUB (+24.1%) NET PROFIT 41.5BN RUB (+123.1%) CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 32.5BN RUB (+97.0%) TOTAL ASSETS 531.9BN RUB (+113.5%) TOTAL EQUITY 390.7BN RUB (+180.9%) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011 47014 PERSONS ENERGY WITHOUT BORDERS ANNUAL REPORT 2011 JSC “INTER RAO UES” Contents ENERGY WITHOUT BORDERS.........................................................................................................................................................1 ADDRESS BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF JSC “INTER RAO UES”..............................................................................................................8 1. General Information about the Company and its Place in the Industry...........................................................10 1.1. Brief History of the Company......................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Business Model of the Group..........................................................................................................................12 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Chain Business Model GRI 106–2, GRI 102–7, GRI 102–9
    Annual Report of PJSC Inter RAO for 2020 Strategic report Sustainable Development Report Corporate Governance Report Appendix 024/025 Supply chain business model GRI 106–2, GRI 102–7, GRI 102–9 Supplier Inter RAO Group Consumers st ELECTRIC POWER Installed capacity of 1st pricing zone of WECM nd 1 pricing zone of WECM Europe and European non-pricing zones GAS SUPPLY Installed capacity of 2 GRID COMPANIES OF RUSSIA 25 GENERATION IN RF and European non-pricing zone 19,933 MW, 5,072 Gcal/h pricing zone of WECM ROSNEFT GROUP 1,855 MW, 554 Gcal/h Gas-fired generation of electricity and heat Coal-fired generation of electricity and heat GAZPROM GROUP bln m3 63,557 mln kWh, 3,569,000 Gcal 3,010 mln kWh, 411,000 Gcal 21,788 Gas-fired Coal-fired power Coal-fired JSC BPGC MW power plants plants power plants 18,541 MW, 1,392 MW, 1,855 MW, COAL SUPPLY 1 5,626 4,580 Gcal/h 492 Gcal/h 554 Gcal/h 10.5 Gcal/h 2nd pricing zone of WECM Siberia JSC RAZREZ KHARANORSKY MUNICIPAL HEATING NETWORKS LLC LOGOTRANSENERGO mln t LLC RUSEXPORTUGOL st nd Gas-fired generation of electricity and heat Coal-fired generation of electricity and heat LLC ARMZ SERVICE JSC RZD THERMAL POWER Installed capacity of 1 pricing zone of WECM Installed capacity of 2 GENERATION IN RF 4,260 MW, 12,216 Gcal/h pricing zone of WECM 2,959 mln kWh, 9,830,000 Gcal 11,874 mln kWh, 5,634,000 Gcal 2,051 MW, 7,192 Gcal/h FUEL OIL SUPPLY 75,000 PJSC ROSNEFT OC t LLC REGIONTOPRESURS 1st pricing zone of WECM Europe PJSC GAZPROM NEFT ELECTRICITY AND HEAT CONSUMERS IN RUSSIA Gas-fired generation of
    [Show full text]
  • Uniper and Fortum
    FORTUM – For a cleaner world Investor / Analyst material April 2018 Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Fortum shares. Past performance is no guide to future performance, and persons needing advice should consult an independent financial adviser. Any references to the future represent the management’s current best understanding. However the final outcome may differ from them. 2 Content Fortum today 4 – 18 European and Nordic power markets 19 – 26 Fortum’s nuclear fleet 27 – 30 Russia 31 – 33 Thermal capacity in Russia 33 Historical achieved prices 34 Interim Report Q1 2018 35 – 55 Uniper investment 56 – 59 IR contacts 60 3 Appr. 130,000 shareholders • Power and heat company in the Nordic Finnish households countries, Russia, Poland and the Baltics 10.3% Financial and • Listed at the Helsinki Stock Exchange insurance institutions 1.4% since 1998 Other Finnish • Among the most traded shares on investors the Nasdaq Helsinki stock exchange 7.5% Finnish • Market cap ~16 billion euros State 50.8% Foreign investors 30.0% 28 February 2018 4 Capital returns: 2017 EUR 1.10 per share ~ EUR 1 billion Fortum’s dividend policy is based on 5 year dividend per share (EUR) history the following preconditions: • The dividend policy ensures that shareholders receive a fair remuneration for their entrusted capital, supported 1,4 1.3 by the company’s long-term strategy that aims at increasing earnings per share and thereby the dividend. 1,2 1.1 0.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 • When proposing the dividend, the Board of Directors 1,0 1.1 looks at a range of factors, including the macro 0,8 environment, balance sheet strength as well as future investment plans.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT Public Joint-Stock Company
    QUARTERLY REPORT Public Joint-Stock Company Federal Hydrogeneration Company RusHydro Code of the Issuer: 55038-E for Q4 2015 Address of the Issuer: 43 Dubrovinskogo St., bldg. 1, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, 660017. The information contained herein is subject to disclosure pursuant to the securities legislation of the Russian Federation Chairman of the Management Board ― General Director ___________________ N.G. Shulginov Date: 15.04.2016 signature _________________ D.V. Finkel Chief Accountant signature Date: 15.04.2016 Contact person: Roman Yurievich Sorokin, Head of Methodology of Corporate Governance and Property Management Department Tel.: +7 800 333 8000 Fax: +7(495) 225-3737 E-mail: [email protected] The address of the Internet site (sites) where the information contained herein is to be disclosed: www.rushydro.ru, http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id=8580 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 2 I. Information on Bank Accounts, Auditor (Audit Organization), Appraiser, and Financial Advisor of the Issuer, as well as on Persons who Have Signed the Quarterly Report ................................................................................ 6 1.1. Information on the Issuer's Bank Accounts .................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Information on the Issuer's Auditor (Audit Organization) ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Competitive Cost-Advantage And
    INVESTMENT CASE COMPETITIVE COST-ADVANTAGE AND KNOWHOW MANAGEMENT SUEK is a leader in the resilient energy, logistics and premium coal markets. REINFORCING OUR LEADERSHIP POSITION No. 6 No. 3 No. 2 No. 4 No. 4 electricity heat producer bulk port gondola railcar coal exporter producer in Russia operator operator globally in Russia in Russia in Russia (TWh) (MGcal) (Mt) Gondola railcars (Mt) managed (ths units) Rosenergoatom Gazprom Energoholding Kuzbassrazrezugol Federal Freight Company Glencore 216 108.3 54 112 78.4 Rushydro T plus SUEK First Freight Company BHP Billiton 131 91.8 50 72 60.4 Gazprom Energoholding SUEK NMTP Modum Trans Bumi Resources 127 43.7 23 68 55.2 Inter RAO Inter RAO UCL Port SUEK SUEK 106 37.3 18 48 53.8 En+ Group RusHydro Mechel Globaltrans Anglo American 82 29.4 14 47 49.8 SUEK En+ Group NefteTransService Adaro 64 26.9 37 40.8 T Plus Kvadra Novotrans Yancoal 55 21.2 25 37.9 UniPro Tatenergo Ugol-Trans Sinar Mas 42 10.5 23 36.8 Source: Companies' public data. MAINTAINING A LOW-COST POSITION THROUGH INTEGRATION Our coal producing assets are positioned at the lower end of the global cost curve due ( $/t, FOB) to economies of scale, highly efficient production and RUB denominated cost base. 100 Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 FOB NEWC = 75 60.5 $/t (2020 average) 50 API2 = 50.3 $/t (2020 average) 25 SUEK 0 Other eporters 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 (Mt) Sources: Wood Mackenzie, SUEK estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Tel Sprav2013.Pdf
    ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ТЕЛЕФОНЫ АДРЕСА 2014 ББК 92 (4Пс) У92 Составитель Э.Ф. Винтанюк, консультант отдела управления делами, кадров Государственного управления образования Псковской области Информацию для справочника представили специалисты рай(гор)управлений образования области, учреждений обра- зования областного и федерального подчинения. Названия учреждений даны в соответствии с информацией на 20.12.2014 г. Учреждения образования: информация, телефоны, адреса: У92 справочник / сост. Э.Ф. Винтанюк. – 10-е изд., доп. и перераб. – Псков: ПОИПКРО, 2014. – 168 с. Справочник содержит информационный материал по сфере образования области (адреса, телефоны). ББК 92 (4Пс) © Издательство Псковского областного института повышения квалификации работников образования, 2014 ÑÎÄÅÐÆÀÍÈÅ Аппарат Государственного управления образования Псковской области .................................................... 7 Городские и районные управления, отделы образования Псковской области .......................................................................... 11 Псковская областная организация профсоюза работников народного образования и науки РФ .............................................. 24 Вузы ФГОУ ВПО «Великолукская государственная академия физической культуры и спорта» ................................................... 25 ФГОУ ВПО «Великолукская государственная сельскохозяйственная академия» ................................................ 25 ФГОУ ВПО «Псковский государственный университет» .............
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report of PJSC Inter RAO / Report on Sustainable Development and Environmental Responsibility
    INFORMATION TRANSLATION Draft 2017 Annual Report of PJSC Inter RAO / Report on Sustainable Development and Environmental Responsibility Chairman of the Management Board Boris Kovalchuk Chief Accountant Alla Vainilavichute Contents 1. Strategic Report ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. At a Glance .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2. About the Report ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Differences from the Development Process of the 2016 Report ............................................................................................................ 11 Scope of Information ............................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Responsibility for the Report Preparation .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Statement on Liability Limitations .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zarasai, Litnuania [email protected] DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN of COMMAND 163
    162 290. INFANTtRIE-DIVISION - UNIT HISTORY LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN OF COMMAND 1940/02/01 Tr.Ueb.Pl. monster, Wenrkreis X, Activation (8. Welle), Subordinate to: Stellv.Gen.Kdo. X, 1940/02/01-1940/05/16 Soltau, Fallingbostel, iibstorf, formation, training C.O.: Gen.Lt. Max uennerlein, 1940/02/06-1940/06/09 Schneveraingen, Bergen, WenrKr. XI (source: situation maps of Lage West ana general officer personnel files) 1940/05/10 Operational readiness 1940/05/14 Schnee citei Transfer Subordinate to: AK 38, 1940/05/17-1940/05/20 1940/05/19 Reuland, Weisstoampach, Saint- Movement AK 42, 1940/05/21-1940/05/23 Hubert, Libin, Gedinne, Belgium 1940/05/24 Kevin, Any, Origny-en-Thieracne, Movement, AK 38, 1940/05/24 Vervins, Sains- Ricnauinont, offensive engagements AK 42, 1940/05/25-1940/06/02 Saint-^uentin, Venaeuil, Laon, AK 18, 1940/06/03-1940/07/08 Oise-Aisne Canal, Soissons, wezy, Chateau-Tiiierry, Nangis, Montargis, CoO.: Gen.Lt. Theodor Frhr. von Wrede, 1940/06/08-1942/07/01 Bieneau, Gien, France 1940/00/21 Bieneau, Gien Offensive engagements 1940/07/01 Cnateauoriant, La Baule, Blois, Coastal defense, 1940/10/10 Neung, Vivy, floyetut, Anders, security, Saint-i>iazaire, Nantes occupation duty, training (no records for I940/0o/21-l941/01/31, source: situation maps of Lage West) 1941/02/01 La iiaule, Cnateaubriant, Nantes Coastal defense, security Subordinate to: AK 25, 1941/02/01-1941/02/28 1941/02/25 Gruuziadz, Poland Transfer, training AK 1, 1941/03/01-1941/03/15 AK 2, 1941/03/16-1941/03/31 1941/04/08 Elbing, Wormditt (Orneta), Movement, AK
    [Show full text]
  • 75E6231a30789a77100300d26
    ИНВЕСТИЦИОННЫЙ МЕМОРАНДУМ ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ INVESTMENT MEMORANDUM PSKOV REGION 3 СОДЕРЖАНИЕ CONTENT 1. КРАТКАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ О ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ .........4 1. SHORT DESCRIPTION OF PSKOV REGION ........................ 5 2. КОНКУРЕНТНЫЕ ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА 2. COMPITITIVE PREFERENCES ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ ......................................................8 OF PSKOV REGION ............................................................. 9 2.1. Выгодное экономико-географическое положение, 2.1. Advantage economic geographical location, высокий уровень транспортной доступности ..................... 8 Effi ciency transport accessibility .......................................... 9 2.2. Высококвалифицированные трудовые ресурсы ........ 12 2.2. Highly-skilled labor resources. .....................................13 2.3 Наличие площадок для размещения промышленных 2.3 Existence of sites for industrial production производств и логистических центров ........................... 14 and logistics centers .........................................................15 2.4. Потенциал использования природных 2.4. Potential of nature resources ресурсов и полезных ископаемых ................................... 16 and minerals use ...............................................................17 2.4.1. Лесные ресурсы .................................................... 16 2.4.1. Forest resources ......................................................17 2.4.2. Водные ресурсы ................................................... 18 2.4.2. Water resources ......................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Press Conference Gazprom's Power Generation Strategy May 16, 2018
    Press Conference Gazprom’s Power Generation Strategy May 16, 2018 MODERATOR: Good afternoon. We continue the series of Press Conferences in the lead-up to the annual General Shareholders Meeting of Gazprom. Today, we will review Gazprom’s Power Generation Strategy. This Press Conference is attended by Denis Fyodorov, Head of Directorate at Gazprom and Director General of Gazprom Energoholding. I give the floor to Mr. Fyodorov, and then we will move on to your questions. DENIS FYODOROV: Good afternoon, dear colleagues. I will try to be brief in my presentation and then answer all of your questions. I would like to begin by emphasizing that 2017 was an anniversary year for us. It was exactly 10 years ago that Gazprom obtained its first power assets. The Gazprom Board of Directors approved the power generation development strategy. By now, it has been fully implemented and completed, and we are ready to put forward a new 10-year strategy for approval very soon. The projects implemented by Gazprom made it possible to create the country’s largest power holding company: controlling stakes were acquired in Mosenergo and TGC-1, in OGK-2 and OGK-6, which are now consolidated in a single company, as well as in MOEK. Today, we account for 16 per cent of all electricity produced in Russia and hold the lead in the national heat supply market. Our most remarkable success of recent years is MOEK’s transformation into a company with positive operating results. We already know that some banking organizations are showing interest in its bond issues, which means that the company has finally managed to show a consistently positive trend after several years of financial instability.
    [Show full text]