Mrna Biogenesis in Tuberculosis Hugh Salamon, Yaming Qiao, Jeff C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mrna Biogenesis in Tuberculosis Hugh Salamon, Yaming Qiao, Jeff C Evidence for Postinitiation Regulation of mRNA Biogenesis in Tuberculosis Hugh Salamon, Yaming Qiao, Jeff C. Cheng, Ken D. Yamaguchi, Patricia Soteropoulos, Michael Weiden, Maria This information is current as Laura Gennaro and Richard Pine of October 1, 2021. J Immunol 2013; 190:2747-2755; Prepublished online 1 February 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202185 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/190/6/2747 Downloaded from Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/02/01/jimmunol.120218 Material 5.DC1 References This article cites 61 articles, 26 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/ http://www.jimmunol.org/content/190/6/2747.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists by guest on October 1, 2021 • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Evidence for Postinitiation Regulation of mRNA Biogenesis in Tuberculosis Hugh Salamon,* Yaming Qiao,† Jeff C. Cheng,‡,1 Ken D. Yamaguchi,* Patricia Soteropoulos,† Michael Weiden,x Maria Laura Gennaro,†,{ and Richard Pine†,{ Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection alters macrophage gene expression and macrophage response to IFN-g, a critical host defense cytokine. However, regulation of these changes is poorly understood. We report discordance of changes in nascent transcript and total nuclear RNA abundance for the transcription factors STAT1 and IRF1, together with lack of effect on their RNA half-lives, in human THP-1 cells infected with M. tuberculosis and stimulated with IFN-g. The results indicate that negative postinitiation regulation of mRNA biogenesis limits the expression of these factors, which mediate host defense against M. tuberculosis through the cellular response to IFN-g. Consistent with the results for STAT1 and IRF1, transcriptome analysis reveals downregulation of postinitiation mRNA biogenesis processes and pathways by infection, with and without IFN-g stimulation. Clinical relevance for Downloaded from regulation of postinitiation mRNA biogenesis is demonstrated by studies of donor samples showing that postinitiation mRNA biogenesis pathways are repressed in latent tuberculosis infection compared with cured disease and in active tuberculosis compared with ongoing treatment or with latent tuberculosis. For active disease and latent infection donors from two populations (London, U.K., and The Gambia), each analyzed using a different platform, pathway-related gene expression differences were highly correlated, demonstrating substantial specificity in the effect. Collectively, the molecular and bioinformatic analyses point toward downregulation of postinitiation mRNA biogenesis pathways as a means by which M. tuberculosis infection limits expression of http://www.jimmunol.org/ immunologically essential transcription factors. Thus, negative regulation of postinitiation mRNA biogenesis can constrain the macrophage response to infection and overall host defense against tuberculosis. The Journal of Immunology, 2013, 190: 2747–2755. orbidity and mortality from tuberculosis are extremely latent infection; reviewed in 5). Determining effects of M. tu- high, with ∼8 million new cases of active disease per berculosis infection on host macrophage gene expression and M year and ∼2 million deaths (1); in the absence of ef- relating those effects to differences in gene expression between fective treatment, mortality is ∼50% (2). Increased failure of anti- individuals who maintain latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and those who develop pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) should facilitate tuberculous chemotherapy (3, 4) with the emergence of multidrug by guest on October 1, 2021 and extensively drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tubercu- efforts to apply host immune pressure against tuberculosis. losis has added urgency to the goal of developing effective vac- The interaction between macrophages infected with M. tuber- cines and immunotherapies. Macrophages are the immune cells culosis and the host immune mediator IFN-g is a major determi- predominantly targeted by M. tuberculosis. Bacterial replication nant of host response to M. tuberculosis (6). The host transcription occurs in macrophages at two points in the immunologic life cycle factors STAT1 and IRF1 are essential mediators of the response of tuberculosis: during the innate immune response to infection to IFN-g and of host defense against M. tuberculosis (7–10). In (before adaptive immunity forces a transition to latent infection) humans, mutations in STAT1 confer susceptibility to normally and during reactivation (when adaptive immunity fails to maintain nonpathogenic mycobacterial infections (11, 12); in mice, a de- ficiency of STAT1 or IRF1 abolishes immune control of M. tu- berculosis growth, which leads to a fatal fulminant infection *Knowledge Synthesis, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94716; †Public Health Research Institute Center, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New rather than a chronic illness with slow disease progression (13, Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103; ‡Department of Biological Sciences, New Jersey Institute x 14). The consequences of deficiencies in these transcription of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Med- factors emphasize that their regulation is essential for an effec- icine, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016; and {Department of Medicine, New Jersey Medical School, University of tive host response to M. tuberculosis. Moreover, both are induced Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103 by M. tuberculosis infection and by IFN-g stimulation (15–21). 1Current address: Early Clinical Development Statistics, Merck Research Laborato- IFN-g induction of STAT1 and IRF1 and M. tuberculosis in- ries, Rahway, NJ. duction of IRF1 are attributable at least in part to increased Received for publication August 7, 2012. Accepted for publication January 1, 2013. transcription. However, little is known about whether mecha- This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI37877 and nisms other than regulation of transcription initiation control their HL68517 (to R.P.) and HL106788 (to M.L.G. and R.P.) and by the Foundation of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (to R.P.). expression, or any other transcriptome changes, with or without IFN-g stimulation in cells infected with M. tuberculosis. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Richard Pine, New Jersey Med- ical School–University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 225 Warren Street, Postinitiation steps in mRNA biogenesis (59 end capping, elon- Newark, NJ 07103. E-mail: [email protected] gation, splicing, 39 end cleavage and polyadenylation) allow reg- The online version of this article contains supplemental material. ulation of gene expression in addition to control of transcription Abbreviations used in this article: CERNO, Coincident Extreme Ranks in Numerical initiation (22–25). Alternative splicing and polyadenylation can Observations; GO, gene ontology; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; PTB, pulmo- determine tissue-specific or signal-mediated levels of transcript nary tuberculosis. isoform expression (reviewed in Refs. 26, 27). For example, in Copyright Ó 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/13/$16.00 patients with chronic granulomatous disease, increased levels of www.jimmunol.org/cgi/doi/10.4049/jimmunol.1202185 2748 REGULATION OF mRNA BIOGENESIS IN TUBERCULOSIS functional NADPH (phagocyte) oxidase as a response to IFN-g Quantitative RT-PCR therapy result from mutations that alter CYBB gene exon usage Reverse transcription reactions, quantitative PCR reactions using molecular (28, 29). In other examples, stimulation of TLRs by bacteria- beacons for amplicon detection, and calculation of target abundance were derived ligands alters transcripts through effects on alternative performed as described previously for IRF1. The results were normalized to splicing and polyadenylation (30–36). With M. tuberculosis in- the level of GAPDH exon 9 for the respective samples (21). Mock reverse fection, alternatively spliced transcripts of IL12Rb are produced transcription samples for each RNA preparation demonstrated negligible DNA contamination. The specificity of assays for introns and exon junc- (37). Even without alternative mRNA processing, changing the tions was confirmed with genomic DNA and cDNA templates. Data are rate of a single processing event can control gene expression from four to six independent experiments; not all genes were assayed in level, as demonstrated for glucocorticoid-mediated repression of some experiments. RNA half-life was calculated as the average of values gonadotropin-releasing hormone expression through inhibition determined
Recommended publications
  • DNA Damage Activates a Spatially Distinct Late Cytoplasmic Cell-Cycle Checkpoint Network Controlled by MK2-Mediated RNA Stabilization
    DNA Damage Activates a Spatially Distinct Late Cytoplasmic Cell-Cycle Checkpoint Network Controlled by MK2-Mediated RNA Stabilization The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Reinhardt, H. Christian, Pia Hasskamp, Ingolf Schmedding, Sandra Morandell, Marcel A.T.M. van Vugt, XiaoZhe Wang, Rune Linding, et al. “DNA Damage Activates a Spatially Distinct Late Cytoplasmic Cell-Cycle Checkpoint Network Controlled by MK2-Mediated RNA Stabilization.” Molecular Cell 40, no. 1 (October 2010): 34–49.© 2010 Elsevier Inc. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.018 Publisher Elsevier B.V. Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85107 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Molecular Cell Article DNA Damage Activates a Spatially Distinct Late Cytoplasmic Cell-Cycle Checkpoint Network Controlled by MK2-Mediated RNA Stabilization H. Christian Reinhardt,1,6,7,8 Pia Hasskamp,1,10,11 Ingolf Schmedding,1,10,11 Sandra Morandell,1 Marcel A.T.M. van Vugt,5 XiaoZhe Wang,9 Rune Linding,4 Shao-En Ong,2 David Weaver,9 Steven A. Carr,2 and Michael B. Yaffe1,2,3,* 1David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02132, USA 2Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02132, USA 3Center for Cell Decision Processes,
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Dynamics in Alzheimer's Disease
    molecules Review RNA Dynamics in Alzheimer’s Disease Agnieszka Rybak-Wolf 1,* and Mireya Plass 2,3,4,* 1 Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), 10115 Berlin, Germany 2 Gene Regulation of Cell Identity, Regenerative Medicine Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain 3 Program for Advancing Clinical Translation of Regenerative Medicine of Catalonia, P-CMR[C], L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain 4 Center for Networked Biomedical Research on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.R.-W.); [email protected] (M.P.) Abstract: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common age-related neurodegenerative disorder that heavily burdens healthcare systems worldwide. There is a significant requirement to understand the still unknown molecular mechanisms underlying AD. Current evidence shows that two of the major features of AD are transcriptome dysregulation and altered function of RNA binding proteins (RBPs), both of which lead to changes in the expression of different RNA species, including microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and messenger RNAs (mRNAs). In this review, we will conduct a comprehensive overview of how RNA dynamics are altered in AD and how this leads to the differential expression of both short and long RNA species. We will describe how RBP expression and function are altered in AD and how this impacts the expression of different RNA species. Furthermore, we will also show how changes in the abundance Citation: Rybak-Wolf, A.; Plass, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Aneuploidy: Using Genetic Instability to Preserve a Haploid Genome?
    Health Science Campus FINAL APPROVAL OF DISSERTATION Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Science (Cancer Biology) Aneuploidy: Using genetic instability to preserve a haploid genome? Submitted by: Ramona Ramdath In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Science Examination Committee Signature/Date Major Advisor: David Allison, M.D., Ph.D. Academic James Trempe, Ph.D. Advisory Committee: David Giovanucci, Ph.D. Randall Ruch, Ph.D. Ronald Mellgren, Ph.D. Senior Associate Dean College of Graduate Studies Michael S. Bisesi, Ph.D. Date of Defense: April 10, 2009 Aneuploidy: Using genetic instability to preserve a haploid genome? Ramona Ramdath University of Toledo, Health Science Campus 2009 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my grandfather who died of lung cancer two years ago, but who always instilled in us the value and importance of education. And to my mom and sister, both of whom have been pillars of support and stimulating conversations. To my sister, Rehanna, especially- I hope this inspires you to achieve all that you want to in life, academically and otherwise. ii Acknowledgements As we go through these academic journeys, there are so many along the way that make an impact not only on our work, but on our lives as well, and I would like to say a heartfelt thank you to all of those people: My Committee members- Dr. James Trempe, Dr. David Giovanucchi, Dr. Ronald Mellgren and Dr. Randall Ruch for their guidance, suggestions, support and confidence in me. My major advisor- Dr. David Allison, for his constructive criticism and positive reinforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Binding Specificities of Human RNA Binding Proteins Towards Structured
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/317909; this version posted March 1, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Binding specificities of human RNA binding proteins towards structured and linear 2 RNA sequences 3 4 Arttu Jolma1,#, Jilin Zhang1,#, Estefania Mondragón4,#, Teemu Kivioja2, Yimeng Yin1, 5 Fangjie Zhu1, Quaid Morris5,6,7,8, Timothy R. Hughes5,6, Louis James Maher III4 and Jussi 6 Taipale1,2,3,* 7 8 9 AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS 10 11 1Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden 12 2Genome-Scale Biology Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 13 3Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom 14 4Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Mayo Clinic Graduate School of 15 Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, USA 16 5Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 17 6Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 18 7Edward S Rogers Sr Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of 19 Toronto, Toronto, Canada 20 8Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 21 #Authors contributed equally 22 *Correspondence: [email protected] 23 24 25 SUMMARY 26 27 Sequence specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) control many important 28 processes affecting gene expression. They regulate RNA metabolism at multiple 29 levels, by affecting splicing of nascent transcripts, RNA folding, base modification, 30 transport, localization, translation and stability. Despite their central role in most 31 aspects of RNA metabolism and function, most RBP binding specificities remain 32 unknown or incompletely defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded the “Top Edge” Version
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Drosophila models of pathogenic copy-number variant genes show global and 2 non-neuronal defects during development 3 Short title: Non-neuronal defects of fly homologs of CNV genes 4 Tanzeen Yusuff1,4, Matthew Jensen1,4, Sneha Yennawar1,4, Lucilla Pizzo1, Siddharth 5 Karthikeyan1, Dagny J. Gould1, Avik Sarker1, Yurika Matsui1,2, Janani Iyer1, Zhi-Chun Lai1,2, 6 and Santhosh Girirajan1,3* 7 8 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, 9 University Park, PA 16802 10 2. Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 11 3. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 12 4 contributed equally to work 13 14 *Correspondence: 15 Santhosh Girirajan, MBBS, PhD 16 205A Life Sciences Building 17 Pennsylvania State University 18 University Park, PA 16802 19 E-mail: [email protected] 20 Phone: 814-865-0674 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 22 ABSTRACT 23 While rare pathogenic copy-number variants (CNVs) are associated with both neuronal and non- 24 neuronal phenotypes, functional studies evaluating these regions have focused on the molecular 25 basis of neuronal defects.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure S1. Androgen Signaling Upregulates an Intronic
    Figure S1. Androgen signaling upregulates an intronic polyadenylated EWSR1 isoform A) Gene expression correlation of EWSR1 and AR in 550 prostate cancer patients from the PRAD data set. B) EWSR1 polyadenylation site (PAS) information from PolyA_db v3.2. There are seven PAS for this gene and they are numbered starting from the 5’ end of the gene. C) Diagram of PAS locations at EWSR1 numbered according to table in A. D) Normalized read count for PAS #2, the PAS for ntEWS, from 3’ sequencing data across various cell types. E) RNA levels of PSA in VCaP, LNCaP, and LNCaP-AR cells treated with DMSO or 10nM R1881 for 24 hours. Expression is normalized to 18S and relative to the DMSO condition. The mean ± SEM for three replicates is shown. F) Immuno blot of ntEWS in PC3 cells overexpressing HA-ntEWS. G) Immunoblot of ntEWS in VCaP cells overexpressing vector alone or shRNAs targeting the 3’ UTR of ntEWS. Tubulin is used as a loading control for immunoblots. Figure S2. AR binding to Intron 5 of EWSR1 directly regulates ntEWS expression A) Gene tracks for AR binding in patient tumor and matched adjacent normal tissue at known AR enhancers. Order of tracks is consistent with Figure 2a. Figure S3. ntEWS promotes phenotypes related to oncogenesis A) Immunoblot of 3xHA tagged EWS isoforms expressed in PC3 cells. Tubulin is used as a loading control. B) MTT proliferation assay of PC3 isoform-expressing lines. Figure S4. The ntEWS alternative last exon encodes an alpha helical domain important for function A) IUPRED prediction of disorder of ntEWS (bottom) and EWS(1-355aa) (top).
    [Show full text]
  • Retroviral Vector Integration Deregulates Gene Expression but Has No Consequence on the Biology and Function of Transplanted T Cells
    Retroviral vector integration deregulates gene expression but has no consequence on the biology and function of transplanted T cells Alessandra Recchia*†, Chiara Bonini*‡, Zulma Magnani*, Fabrizia Urbinati†, Daniela Sartori*§, Sara Muraro*, Enrico Tagliafico†, Attilio Bondanza*¶, Maria Teresa Lupo Stanghellini‡, Massimo Bernardi‡, Alessandra Pescarollo‡, Fabio Ciceri‡, Claudio Bordignon§¶, and Fulvio Mavilio†ʈ *Cancer Immunotherapy and Gene Therapy Program, and ‡Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Istituto Scientifico H. San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; †Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 287, 41100 Modena, Italy; §MolMed S.p.A., Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy; and ¶San Raffaele ‘‘Vita e Salute’’ University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy Edited by Malcolm A. Martin, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and approved December 6, 2005 (received for review September 1, 2005) The use of retroviral vectors in gene therapy has raised safety is currently profiled to provide a graft-versus-leukemia effect to concerns for the genotoxic risk associated with their uncontrolled patients in relapse after HLA-identical HSC transplantation (14), insertion into the human genome. We have analyzed the conse- or to promote immune reconstitution and prevent relapse in quences of retroviral transduction in T cells from leukemic patients patients undergoing HLA-haploidentical HSC transplantation. In treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation and donor lym- 46 patients treated since 1994 in both contexts, we were able to phocytes genetically modified with a suicide gene (HSV-TK). Ret- control GvHD in 100% of the cases, while preserving antiviral and roviral vectors integrate preferentially within or near transcribed antitumor activity (14–16).
    [Show full text]
  • HNRNPA0 Mouse Monoclonal Antibody [Clone ID: OTI8H8] Product Data
    OriGene Technologies, Inc. 9620 Medical Center Drive, Ste 200 Rockville, MD 20850, US Phone: +1-888-267-4436 [email protected] EU: [email protected] CN: [email protected] Product datasheet for CF809308 HNRNPA0 Mouse Monoclonal Antibody [Clone ID: OTI8H8] Product data: Product Type: Primary Antibodies Clone Name: OTI8H8 Applications: IHC, WB Recommended Dilution: WB 1:2000, IHC 1:150 Reactivity: Human, Mouse, Rat Host: Mouse Isotype: IgG1 Clonality: Monoclonal Immunogen: Human recombinant protein fragment corresponding to amino acids 139-183 of human HNRNPA0 (NP_006796) produced in E.coli. Formulation: Lyophilized powder (original buffer 1X PBS, pH 7.3, 8% trehalose) Reconstitution Method: For reconstitution, we recommend adding 100uL distilled water to a final antibody concentration of about 1 mg/mL. To use this carrier-free antibody for conjugation experiment, we strongly recommend performing another round of desalting process. (OriGene recommends Zeba Spin Desalting Columns, 7KMWCO from Thermo Scientific) Purification: Purified from mouse ascites fluids or tissue culture supernatant by affinity chromatography (protein A/G) Conjugation: Unconjugated Storage: Store at -20°C as received. Stability: Stable for 12 months from date of receipt. Predicted Protein Size: 30.7 kDa Gene Name: Homo sapiens heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A0 (HNRNPA0), mRNA. Database Link: NP_006796 Entrez Gene 10949 Human Q13151 This product is to be used for laboratory only. Not for diagnostic or therapeutic use. View online » ©2021 OriGene Technologies, Inc., 9620 Medical Center Drive, Ste 200, Rockville, MD 20850, US 1 / 5 HNRNPA0 Mouse Monoclonal Antibody [Clone ID: OTI8H8] – CF809308 Background: This gene belongs to the A/B subfamily of ubiquitously expressed heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs).
    [Show full text]
  • Overexpressed HSF1 Cancer Signature Genes Cluster in Human Chromosome 8Q Christopher Q
    Zhang et al. Human Genomics (2017) 11:35 DOI 10.1186/s40246-017-0131-5 PRIMARY RESEARCH Open Access Overexpressed HSF1 cancer signature genes cluster in human chromosome 8q Christopher Q. Zhang1,4, Heinric Williams3,4, Thomas L. Prince3,4† and Eric S. Ho1,2*† Abstract Background: HSF1 (heat shock factor 1) is a transcription factor that is found to facilitate malignant cancer development and proliferation. In cancer cells, HSF1 mediates a set of genes distinct from heat shock that contributes to malignancy. This set of genes is known as the HSF1 Cancer Signature genes or simply HSF1-CanSig genes. HSF1-CanSig genes function and operate differently than typical cancer-causing genes, yet it is involved in fundamental oncogenic processes. Results: By utilizing expression data from 9241 cancer patients, we identified that human chromosome 8q21-24 is a location hotspot for the most frequently overexpressed HSF1-CanSig genes. Intriguingly, the strength of the HSF1 cancer program correlates with the number of overexpressed HSF1-CanSig genes in 8q, illuminating the essential role of HSF1 in mediating gene expression in different cancers. Chromosome 8q21-24 is found under selective pressure in preserving gene order as it exhibits strong synteny among human, mouse, rat, and bovine, although the biological significance remains unknown. Statistical modeling, hierarchical clustering, and gene ontology-based pathway analyses indicate crosstalk between HSF1-mediated responses and pre-mRNA 3′ processing in cancers. Conclusions: Our results confirm the unique role of chromosome 8q mediated by the master regulator HSF1 in cancer cases. Additionally, this study highlights the connection between cellular processes triggered by HSF1 and pre-mRNA 3′ processing in cancers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultraconserved Elements Are Associated with Homeostatic Control of Splicing Regulators by Alternative Splicing and Nonsense-Mediated Decay
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Ultraconserved elements are associated with homeostatic control of splicing regulators by alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated decay Julie Z. Ni,1 Leslie Grate,1 John Paul Donohue,1 Christine Preston,2 Naomi Nobida,2 Georgeann O’Brien,2 Lily Shiue,1 Tyson A. Clark,3 John E. Blume,3 and Manuel Ares Jr.1,2,4 1Center for Molecular Biology of RNA and Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA; 2Hughes Undergraduate Research Laboratory, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA; 3Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, California 95051, USA Many alternative splicing events create RNAs with premature stop codons, suggesting that alternative splicing coupled with nonsense-mediated decay (AS-NMD) may regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. We tested this idea in mice by blocking NMD and measuring changes in isoform representation using splicing-sensitive microarrays. We found a striking class of highly conserved stop codon-containing exons whose inclusion renders the transcript sensitive to NMD. A genomic search for additional examples identified >50 such exons in genes with a variety of functions. These exons are unusually frequent in genes that encode splicing activators and are unexpectedly enriched in the so-called “ultraconserved” elements in the mammalian lineage. Further analysis show that NMD of mRNAs for splicing activators such as SR proteins is triggered by splicing activation events, whereas NMD of the mRNAs for negatively acting hnRNP proteins is triggered by splicing repression, a polarity consistent with widespread homeostatic control of splicing regulator gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemcomm. This Journal Is © the Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for ChemComm. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 tel26 Nuclear proteins identification ‐ Summary Accession Score Mass Matches tel26 Exp 1 Matches tel26 Exp 2 Protein(s) name* scr26 Exp1** scr26 Exp2** XRCC5_HUMAN 450 83222 39 49 X‐ray repair cross‐complementing protein 5 OS=Homo sapiens GN=XRCC5 PE=1 SV=3 yes yes XRCC6_HUMAN 444 70084 35 53 X‐ray repair cross‐complementing protein 6 OS=Homo sapiens GN=XRCC6 PE=1 SV=2 no no HMGB1_HUMAN 88 25049 9 25 High mobility group protein B1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=HMGB1 PE=1 SV=3 no no HMGB2_HUMAN 69 24190 4 17 High mobility group protein B2 OS=Homo sapiens GN=HMGB2 PE=1 SV=2 yes yes FUBP2_HUMAN 126 73355 9 9 Far upstream element‐binding protein 2 OS=Homo sapiens GN=KHSRP PE=1 SV=4 no no RFA1_HUMAN 67 68723 7 10 Replication protein A 70 kDa DNA‐binding subunit OS=Homo sapiens GN=RPA1 PE=1 SV=2 no no PPIA_HUMAN 95 18229 11 3 Peptidyl‐prolyl cis‐trans isomerase A OS=Homo sapiens GN=PPIA PE=1 SV=2 yes yes LMNB1_HUMAN 64 66653 6 8 Lamin‐B1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=LMNB1 PE=1 SV=2 no no ROAA_HUMAN 52 36316 3 10 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A/B OS=Homo sapiens GN=HNRNPAB PE=1 SV=2 no no EHD4_HUMAN 70 61365 6 7 EH domain‐containing protein 4 OS=Homo sapiens GN=EHD4 PE=1 SV=1 no no FUBP1_HUMAN 49 67690 5 8 Far upstream element‐binding protein 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=FUBP1 PE=1 SV=3 no yes MCM7_HUMAN 53 81884 5 7 DNA replication licensing factor MCM7 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MCM7 PE=1 SV=4 no no SEPT9_HUMAN 41 65646 3 9 Septin‐9 OS=Homo sapiens GN=SEPT9 PE=1
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title: Ultra-Conserved Elements in the Human Genome Authors And
    4/22/2004 Title: Ultra-conserved elements in the human genome Authors and affiliations: Gill Bejerano*, Michael Pheasant**, Igor Makunin**, Stuart Stephen**, W. James Kent*, John S. Mattick** and David Haussler*** *Department of Biomolecular Engineering and ***Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA **ARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia Corresponding authors: Gill Bejerano ([email protected]) and David Haussler ([email protected]) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Supporting on-line material: Separate figures, Like Figure 1 but for each individual chromosome are available in postscript and PDF format, at http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/~jill/ultra.html. Table S1. A table listing all 481 ultra conserved elements and their properties can be found at http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/~jill/ultra.html. The elements were extracted from an alignment of NCBI Build 34 of the human genome (July 2003, UCSC hg16), mouse NCBI Build 30 (February 2003, UCSC mm3), and rat Baylor HGSC v3.1 (June 2003, UCSC rn3). This table does not include an additional, probably ultra conserved element (uc.10) overlapping an alternatively spliced exon of FUSIP1, which is not yet placed in the current assembly of human chromosome 1. Nor does the list contain the ultra conserved elements found in ribosomal RNA sequences, as these are not currently present as part of the draft genome sequences. The small subunit 18S rRNA includes 3 ultra conserved regions of sizes 399, 224, 212bp and the large subunit 28S rRNA contains 3 additional regions of sizes 277, 335, 227bp (the later two are one base apart).
    [Show full text]