bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1 Drosophila models of pathogenic copy-number variant genes show global and
2 non-neuronal defects during development
3 Short title: Non-neuronal defects of fly homologs of CNV genes
4 Tanzeen Yusuff1,4, Matthew Jensen1,4, Sneha Yennawar1,4, Lucilla Pizzo1, Siddharth
5 Karthikeyan1, Dagny J. Gould1, Avik Sarker1, Yurika Matsui1,2, Janani Iyer1, Zhi-Chun Lai1,2,
6 and Santhosh Girirajan1,3*
7
8 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University,
9 University Park, PA 16802
10 2. Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
11 3. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
12 4 contributed equally to work
13
14 *Correspondence:
15 Santhosh Girirajan, MBBS, PhD
16 205A Life Sciences Building
17 Pennsylvania State University
18 University Park, PA 16802
19 E-mail: [email protected]
20 Phone: 814-865-0674
21
1
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
22 ABSTRACT
23 While rare pathogenic copy-number variants (CNVs) are associated with both neuronal and non-
24 neuronal phenotypes, functional studies evaluating these regions have focused on the molecular
25 basis of neuronal defects. We report a systematic functional analysis of non-neuronal defects for
26 homologs of 59 genes within ten CNVs and 20 neurodevelopmental genes in Drosophila. Using
27 wing-specific knockdown of 136 RNA interference lines, we identified qualitative and
28 quantitative phenotypes in 72/79 homologs, including six lines with lethality and 21 lines with
29 severe wing defects. Assessment of 66 lines for tissue-specific effects showed no correlation
30 between the severity of wing and eye-specific defects. We observed disruptions in cell
31 proliferation and apoptosis in larval wing discs for 23/27 homologs, and altered Wnt, Hedgehog
32 and Notch signaling for 9/14 homologs, including AATF/Aatf, PPP4C/Pp4-19C, and
33 KIF11/Klp61F. These findings were further validated with differences in human tissue-specific
34 expression and network connectivity of CNV genes. Our findings suggest that multiple genes
35 within each CNV differentially affect both global and tissue-specific developmental processes
36 within conserved pathways, and that their roles are not restricted to neuronal functions.
2
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
37 INTRODUCTION
38 Rare copy-number variants (CNV), or deletions and duplications in the genome, are associated
39 with neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism, intellectual disability (ID), and schizophrenia
40 [1,2]. While dosage alteration of CNV regions contribute predominantly to defects in nervous
41 system development, several CNV-associated disorders also lead to early developmental features
42 involving other organ systems [3,4], including cardiac defects [5,6], kidney malformations[7],
43 craniofacial features [3], and skeletal abnormalities [8]. For example, the 1q21.1 deletion causes
44 variable expression of multiple neuronal and non-neuronal phenotypes, including developmental
45 delay, autism, and schizophrenia as well as craniofacial features, cataracts, cardiac defects, and
46 skeletal abnormalities [9–11]. Additionally, while the 7q11.23 deletion associated with
47 Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) causes neuropsychiatric and behavioral features, other non-
48 neuronal phenotypes, including supravalvular aortic stenosis, auditory defects, hypertension,
49 diabetes mellitus, and musculoskeletal and connective tissue anomalies, are also observed among
50 the deletion carriers [12].
51 Despite the notable prevalence of non-neuronal phenotypes in CNV carriers, functional
52 studies of CNV genes have primarily focused on detailed assessments of neuronal and behavioral
53 phenotypes in model systems. For example, mouse models for the 16p11.2 deletion exhibited
54 post-natal lethality, reduced brain size and neural progenitor cell count, motor and habituation
55 defects, synaptic defects, and behavioral defects [13–15]. Similarly, mouse models for the 3q29
56 deletion showed decreased weight and brain size, increased locomotor activity and startle
57 response, and decreased spatial learning and memory [16,17]. However, fewer studies have
58 focused on detailed evaluation of non-neuronal phenotypes in functional models of CNV
59 disorders. For example, Arbogast and colleagues evaluated obesity and metabolic changes in
3
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
60 16p11.2 deletion mice, which showed reduced weight and impaired adipogenesis [18]. While
61 Haller and colleagues showed that mice with knockdown of MAZ, a gene within the 16p11.2
62 deletion region, contribute to the genitourinary defects observed in individuals with the deletion
63 [19], mouse studies on other homologs of 16p11.2 genes, including TAOK2, KCTD13, and
64 MAPK3, have only focused on assessing neuronal defects [20–24]. Furthermore, Dickinson and
65 colleagues reported a high-throughput analysis of essential genes in mice and identified both
66 neuronal and non-neuronal phenotypes for individual gene knockouts, including more than 400
67 genes that lead to lethality [25]. While these efforts aided in implicating novel genes with human
68 disease, our understanding of how genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders
69 contribute towards non-neuronal phenotypes is still limited. Therefore, a large-scale analysis of
70 non-neuronal phenotypes is necessary to identify specific candidate genes within CNV regions
71 and associated biological mechanisms that contribute towards these phenotypes.
72 Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model system to evaluate homologs of
73 neurodevelopmental genes, as many developmental processes and signaling pathways are
74 conserved between humans and flies [26]. In fact, over 75% of human disease genes have
75 homologs in Drosophila, including many genes involved in cellular signaling processes [27,28].
76 We recently examined the contributions of individual Drosophila homologs of 28 genes within
77 the 16p11.2 and 3q29 deletion regions towards specific neurodevelopmental phenotypes,
78 including rough eye phenotypes and defects in climbing ability, axon targeting, neuromuscular
79 junction, and dendritic arborization [29,30]. While these findings implicated multiple genes
80 within each CNV region towards conserved cellular processes in neuronal tissues, the conserved
81 role of these genes in non-neuronal tissues is not well understood. The Drosophila wing is an
82 effective model system to evaluate such developmental defects, as key components of conserved
4
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
83 signaling pathways, such as Notch, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Hegdehog, and
84 Wnt pathways, were identified using fly wing models [31–37]. Although fly wing phenotypes
85 cannot be directly translated to human phenotypes, defects observed in fly wings can be used to
86 assess how homologs of human disease genes alter conserved cellular and developmental
87 mechanisms. For example, Wu and colleagues showed that overexpression of the Drosophila
88 homolog for UBE3A, associated with Angelman syndrome, leads to abnormal wing and eye
89 morphology defects [38]. Furthermore, Drosophila mutant screens for developmental
90 phenotypes, including wing defects, were used to identify conserved genes for several human
91 genetic diseases, including Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and syndromic microcephaly [39].
92 Kochinke and colleagues also recently performed a large-scale screening of ID-associated genes,
93 and found an enrichment of wing trichome density and missing vein phenotypes in ID genes
94 compared to control gene sets [40]. Hence, the fly wing provides a model system that is ideal for
95 evaluating the contributions of individual homologs of CNV genes towards cellular and
96 developmental defects.
97 In this study, we tested tissue-specific and cellular phenotypes of 79 fly homologs of
98 human genes within ten pathogenic CNV regions and genes associated with neurodevelopmental
99 disorders. Particularly, we used the adult fly wing to evaluate phenotypes in a non-neuronal
100 tissue, and observed a wide range of robust qualitative and quantitative wing phenotypes among
101 the 136 RNA interference (RNAi) lines tested in our study, including size defects, ectopic and
102 missing veins, severe wrinkling, and lethality. Further analysis of cellular phenotypes revealed
103 disruptions in conserved developmental processes in the larval imaginal wing disc, including
104 altered levels of cell proliferation and apoptosis as well as altered expression patterns in the Wnt,
105 Hedgehog, and Notch signaling pathways. However, we found no correlation in the severity of
5
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
106 phenotypes observed with wing and eye-specific knockdown. Our findings were further
107 supported by differences in expression patterns and network connectivity of human CNV genes
108 across different tissues. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of multiple genes within each
109 CNV region towards both global and tissue-specific developmental processes.
6
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
110 RESULTS
111 Knockdown of fly homologs of CNV genes contribute to a range of wing defects
112 Using an RNAi based analysis driven by the bxMS1096-GAL4 wing-specific driver, we tested a
113 total of 136 RNAi lines for 59 homologs of genes within pathogenic CNV regions (chromosomal
114 locations 1q21.1, 3q29, 7q11.23, 15q11.2, 15q13.3, 16p11.2, distal 16p11.2, 16p12.1, 16p13.11,
115 and 17q12) and 20 homologs of genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders (Supp.
116 Data 1). Fly homologs of these genes were identified using the DIOPT orthology prediction tool
117 [41]. We list both the human gene name and the fly gene name for each tested gene as HUMAN
118 GENE/Fly gene (i.e. KCTD13/CG10465) as well as the human CNV region for context at first
119 instance. We scored 20-25 adult wings for five distinct wing phenotypes in each non-lethal
120 RNAi line, including wrinkled wing, discoloration, ectopic veins, missing veins, and bristle
121 planar polarity phenotypes (Fig. 1A; Supp. Data 2). We first categorized each wing phenotype
122 based on their severity and performed k-means clustering analysis to categorize each RNAi line
123 by their overall phenotype severity (Fig. 1B-C). We observed four clusters of RNAi lines: 75
124 lines with no observable qualitative phenotypes (55.2%), 24 lines with mild phenotypes (17.7%),
125 10 lines with moderate phenotypes (7.4%), 21 lines with severe phenotypes (15.4%), and 6 lines
126 with lethal phenotypes (4.4%), including ACACA/ACC within 17q12, DLG1/dlg1 within 3q29,
127 and STX1A/Syx1A within 7q11.23 (Fig. 1B-D; Supp. Data 2). We observed severe wrinkled
128 wing phenotypes for 13/79 fly homologs, including PPP4C/Pp4-19C within 16p11.2,
129 ATXN2L/Atx2 within distal 16p11.2, AATF/Aatf within 17q12, and MFI2/Tsf2 within 3q29 (Fig.
130 2A-B, Supp. Data 3). Interestingly, seven out of ten CNV regions contained at least one
131 homolog that showed lethality or severe wing phenotypes, and five CNV regions (3q29, 16p11.2,
132 distal 16p11.2, 16p12.1, and 17q12) had multiple homologs showing lethality or severe wing
7
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
133 phenotypes (Fig. 2A, Supp. Data 3). For example, RNAi lines for both UQCRC2/UQCR-C2 and
134 POLR3E/Sin within 16p12.1 showed lethality. Within the 3q29 region, NCBP2/Cbp20 and
135 MFI2/Tsf2 showed severe phenotypes while DLG1/dlg1 showed lethality. In contrast, 12/20
136 known neurodevelopmental genes showed no observable wing phenotypes, suggesting that these
137 genes could be responsible for neuronal-specific phenotypes (Fig. 2B, Supp. Data 3). We note
138 that 18/79 fly homologs showed discordant phenotypes between two or more RNAi lines for the
139 same gene, which could be due to differences in expression of the RNAi construct among these
140 lines (Supp. Data 3).
141 Certain qualitative phenotypes exhibited higher frequency in males compared to females.
142 For example, discoloration (87 lines in males compared to 56 lines in females; p=1.315×10-4,
143 two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) and missing vein phenotypes (92 lines in males compared to 29
144 lines in females; p=2.848×10-16, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) at any degree of severity were
145 more commonly observed in males than females (Supp. Data 2). In particular, 25/92 lines in
146 males (compared to 1/29 in females) showed a total loss of the anterior crossvein (ACV) (Supp.
147 Data 2). We further identified 17 RNAi lines that were lethal in males with wing-specific
148 knockdown of fly homologs. While higher frequencies of wing phenotypes in males could be
149 due to a sex-specific bias of developmental phenotypes, the increased severity we observed in
150 males is most likely due to a stronger RNAi knockdown caused by an X-linked dosage
151 compensation, as the bxMS1096-GAL4 driver is inserted on the fly X chromosome [42,43].
152 Next, we measured the total adult wing area and the lengths of six veins (longitudinal L2,
153 L3, L4, L5, ACV, and posterior crossvein or PCV) in the adult wing for each of the tested RNAi
154 lines that did not show lethality (or severe wrinkled phenotypes for vein length measurements)
155 (Fig. 3A). Overall, we identified significant wing measurement changes for 89 RNAi lines
8
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
156 compared to controls, which included lines that did not have an observable qualitative wing
157 phenotype (Fig. 1D). A summary of L3 vein lengths is presented in Fig. 3B, and the
158 measurements for the remaining five veins are presented in Supp. Figure 1 and Supp. Data. 2.
159 We found that 33/61 of the homologs (54%) showed significant changes in L3 vein length,
160 including 20 homologs with longer vein lengths and 13 homologs with shorter vein lengths
161 (Supp. Data 3). Additionally, 41/74 of the fly homologs (55%) showed changes in wing area
162 (Supp. Data 3), including 36 homologs which showed smaller wing areas and five homologs
163 showed larger wing areas compared to controls (Supp. Data 3). For example, both homologs of
164 genes within 1q21.1 region, BCL9/lgs and FMO5/Fmo-2, showed decreased wing area and vein
165 length, potentially mirroring the reduced body length phenotype observed in mouse models of
166 the deletion [44] (Fig. 3B-C). In addition, PAK2/Pak within 3q29, TBX1/org-1 within 22q11.2,
167 autism-associated CHD8/kis, and microcephaly-associated ASPM/asp also showed smaller wing
168 areas and vein lengths (Fig. 3B-C). In contrast, TRPM1/Trpm within 15q13.3 and the cell
169 proliferation gene PTEN/Pten [45] both showed larger wing areas and vein lengths (Fig. 3B-C).
170 Furthermore, we identified eight homologs that showed no qualitative wing phenotypes but had
171 significant changes in wing areas and vein lengths (Supp. Data 3), including CCDC101/Sgf29 in
172 distal 16p11.2, FMO5/Fmo-2, TRPM1/Trpm, DHRS11/CG9150 in 17q12, and NSUN5/Nsun5 in
173 7q11.23 (Fig. 3B-C; Supp. Data 3). These results indicate that homologs of certain CNV genes
174 may influence variations in size without causing adverse wing phenotypes, and may be
175 specifically implicated towards cellular growth mechanisms.
176
177
178
9
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
179 Homologs of CNV genes show global and tissue-specific effects during development
180 We previously showed that many of the same fly homologs of CNV genes that showed wing
181 defects in the current study also contributed towards neuronal phenotypes in the fly eye [29,30],
182 suggesting a role for these genes in global development. We therefore performed ubiquitous and
183 eye-specific knockdown of fly homologs to assess tissue-specific effects in comparison to the
184 wing phenotypes. First, we used the da-GAL4 driver at 25°C to drive ubiquitous knockdown of
185 RNAi lines for 31 homologs of CNV genes, including 19 that were previously published [29,30],
186 and observed complete or partial lethality at larval and pupal stages with knockdown of 10/31
187 homologs (32.3%) (Fig. 4A). Lethal phenotypes have also been documented for 43/130
188 knockout mouse models of individual CNV genes as well as for the entire deletion (Supp. Data
189 4). For example, mouse models heterozygous for the 16p11.2 deletion showed partial neonatal
190 lethality, while knockout mouse models of four individual genes within the 16p11.2 region,
191 including Ppp4C-/- and Kif22-/-, showed embryonic lethality [13,46,47]. In our study, the
192 DLG1/dlg1 line that showed lethality with wing-specific knockdown also exhibited larval
193 lethality with ubiquitous knockdown, indicating its role in global development (Fig. 4A). In
194 addition, six homologs that showed severe wing phenotypes also showed larval or pupal lethality
195 with ubiquitous knockdown, including ALDOA/Ald and PPP4C/Pp4-19C within 16p11.2 and
196 ATXN2L/Atx2 and TUFM/mEFTu1 within distal 16p11.2 (Fig. 4A). The remaining homologs
197 that showed lethality with ubiquitous knockdown showed at least a mild qualitative or
198 quantitative wing phenotype.
199 We next compared the phenotypes observed with wing-specific knockdown of fly
200 homologs to their corresponding eye-specific knockdowns to evaluate tissue-specific effects. To
201 quantitatively assess the phenotypic severity of cellular defects with eye-specific knockdown of
10
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
202 fly homologs, we developed a tool called Flynotyper [48] that determines the degree of
203 disorganization among the ommatidia in the adult eye. We analyzed phenotypic scores obtained
204 from Flynotyper for 66 RNAi lines of 45 fly homologs, including from previously-published
205 datasets [29,30,48]. We found that 37/45 homologs (82.2%) exhibited both eye and wing-
206 specific defects (Fig. 4B, Supp. Fig. 2, Supp. Data 5). Two homologs with significant eye
207 phenotypes did not show any wing phenotypes, including SPNS1/spin within distal 16p11.2 and
208 microcephaly-associated SLC25A19/Tpc1 [49], while five homologs only showed wing-specific
209 phenotypes, including CDIPT/Pis and YPEL3/CG15309 within 16p11.2, FBXO45/Fsn and
210 OSTalpha/CG6836 within 3q29, and UQCRC2/UQCR-C2 (Fig. 4B, Supp. Fig. 2). In particular,
211 UQCRC2/UQCR-C2 showed lethality with wing-specific knockdown, suggesting potential
212 tissue-specific effects of this gene in non-neuronal cells (Fig. 4B). While most homologs
213 contributed towards both eye and wing-specific phenotypes, we observed a wide range of
214 severity in eye phenotypes that did not correlate with the severity of quantitative or qualitative
215 wing phenotypes (Fig. 4C). For example, TUFM/mEFTu1 showed a severe wing phenotype but
216 only a mild increase in eye phenotypic score, while SH2B1/Lnk, also within the distal 16p11.2
217 region, showed severe rough eye phenotypes but only a mild increase in wing size (Fig. 4D).
218 Similarly, BCL9/lgs also showed opposing tissue-specific effects with mild qualitative wing
219 phenotype and severe eye phenotype, suggesting that the role of these homologs towards
220 development differs across tissue types.
221
222 CNV genes show variable expression across different tissues in flies and humans
223 To assess how expression levels of CNV genes vary across different tissues, we first examined
224 the expression patterns of fly homologs in larval and adult tissues using the FlyAtlas Anatomical
11
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
225 Microarray dataset [50]. We found that 76/77 homologs with available data were expressed in at
226 least one larval and adult tissue (Supp. Fig. 3, Supp. Data 6). In general, we did not observe a
227 correlation between wing phenotype severity and expression patterns of homologs in larval or
228 adult tissues (Fig. 5A). For example, 58/77 homologs (75.3%) showed ubiquitous larval
229 expression, including both fly homologs that showed no qualitative wing phenotypes, such as
230 KCTD13/CG10465 within 16p11.2 and FBXO45/Fsn, and those with severe wing phenotypes,
231 such as PPP4C/Pp4-19C and NCBP2/Cbp20 (Fig. 5A, Supp. Fig. 3). Furthermore, 30/39
232 homologs (76.9%) that showed eye phenotypes also had ubiquitous larval expression, providing
233 further support to the observation that genes causing neuronal phenotypes may also contribute to
234 developmental phenotypes in other tissues (Supp. Data 5). Of note, 9/77 homologs (11.7%) did
235 not have any expression in the larval central nervous system, including FMO5/Fmo-2,
236 BDH1/CG8888 within 3q29, and TBX6/Doc2 within 16p11.2 (Fig. 5A, Supp. Fig. 3). However,
237 we observed wing phenotypes for 8/9 of these homologs, suggesting that they may contribute to
238 tissue-specific phenotypes outside of the nervous system. Except for the epilepsy-associated
239 SCN1A/para [51], which was exclusively expressed in both the larval central nervous system
240 (CNS) and adult brain tissues, other tested neurodevelopmental genes were also expressed in
241 non-neuronal tissues (Fig. 5A).
242 We further used the GTEx Consortium dataset [52] to examine tissue-specific expression
243 of 150 human CNV and known neurodevelopmental genes across six tissues including brain,
244 heart, kidney, lung, liver, and muscle. We found 121 genes that were expressed in at least one
245 adult tissue, including 49 genes (32.7%) that showed ubiquitous expression across all six tissues
246 (Supp. Data 6). Of the 112 genes expressed in non-neuronal tissues, 34 did not have any
247 neuronal expression, including TBX1, FMO5 and GJA5 within 1q21.1, and ATP2A1 within distal
12
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
248 16p11.2 (Fig. 5B, Supp. Data 6). FMO5 and TBX1 also showed non-neuronal expression in
249 Drosophila tissues, suggesting that their tissue-specific expression is highly conserved (Fig. 5A).
250 Other genes showing ubiquitous expression also had preferentially high expression for specific
251 non-neuronal tissues, including ALDOA and UQCRC2 for muscle and heart (Fig. 5B). In
252 contrast, we found nine genes that were expressed only in the adult brain, including FAM57B
253 and DOC2A within 16p11.2, as well as SCN1A, which showed similar CNS-only expression in
254 Drosophila tissues (Fig. 5B, Supp. Data 6).
255
256 Knockdown of fly homologs of CNV genes lead to disruption of cellular processes
257 The disruption of basic cellular processes in neuronal cells, such as cell proliferation and
258 apoptosis, have been implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders [53–55]. We previously
259 identified defects in cell proliferation among photoreceptors neurons in larval eye discs with
260 knockdown of 16p11.2 homologs, as well as increased apoptosis with knockdown of a subset of
261 3q29 homologs [29,30]. Here, we explored how these basic cellular processes are altered in non-
262 neuronal cells, specifically in the developing wing disc, with knockdown of homologs of CNV
263 genes. We targeted 27 fly homologs that showed a range of adult wing phenotypes for changes in
264 cell proliferation and apoptosis, using anti-phospho-Histone H3 Ser10 (pH3) and anti-
265 Drosophila caspase-1 (dcp1), respectively, in the third instar larval wing discs. We identified
266 23/27 homologs that showed significant increases in apoptotic cells compared to controls,
267 including seven homologs, such as PPP4C/Pp4-19C, ATXN2L/Atx2, and AATF/Aatf , which
268 showed dcp1 staining across the entire larval wing pouch (Fig. 6A-B, Supp. Figs. 4-5, Supp.
269 Data 7). In addition, 16/27 genes showed decreased levels of proliferation, including eight
270 homologs which also showed apoptosis defects, such as CYFIP1/Sra-1 within 15q11.2,
13
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
271 SH2B1/Lnk, and the microcephaly gene KIF11/Klp61F (Fig. 6A and 6C, Supp. Figs. 4-5, Supp.
272 Data 7). All six of the tested homologs with severe adult wing phenotypes showed both
273 increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation (Supp. Data 7). Similarly, 3/4 homologs of
274 genes showing lethality with wing-specific knockdown also showed defects in apoptosis or
275 proliferation, with the exception of ACACA/ACC (Supp. Figure 4, Supp. Data 7). As bxMS1096-
276 GAL4 is located on the X-chromosome, we expected to see more severe defects in males
277 compared with females with knockdown of homologs due to the X-linked dosage compensation
278 [42,43]. However, knockdown of 3/11 tested homologs with sex-specific differences in adult
279 wing phenotypes, including BCL9/lgs, CYFIP1/Sra-1, and DNAJC30/CG11035 within 7q11.23,
280 showed significantly decreased levels of cell proliferation in females but no change for males
281 compared to their respective controls, suggesting a sex-specific effect of these genes for cell
282 proliferation (Supp. Fig. 5, Supp. Data 7). Overall, our results suggest that cell proliferation and
283 apoptosis are disrupted by reduced expression of homologs of CNV genes in both neuronal and
284 non-neuronal tissues.
285
286 Knockdown of homologs of CNV genes disrupt conserved signaling pathways
287 Several conserved signaling pathways that are active in a spatial and temporal manner in the
288 larval wing disc, such as Wnt, Hedgehog, BMP, and Notch signaling, regulate the anterior-
289 posterior (A/P) and dorsal-ventral (D/V) boundaries to determine accurate morphology and vein
290 patterning in the adult wing [36,37,56–58]. For example, Wnt and Notch signaling pathways
291 both act along the D/V boundary to determine cell fate [59,60], while Hedgehog signaling is
292 dependent upon expression of both engrailed in the posterior compartment and patched along the
293 A/P border [61,62]. Furthermore, O’Roak and colleagues showed that genes identified from de
14
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
294 novo mutations in patients with autism are linked to β-catenin/Wnt pathway [63]. In addition,
295 familial loss-of-function mutations in the human hedgehog signaling pathway gene PTCH1 are
296 implicated in basal cell nevus syndrome, leading to basal cell carcinoma [64,65].
297 Based on adult wing phenotypes and disruptions to cellular processes, we next tested
298 whether knockdown of 14 fly homologs disrupt conserved signaling pathways in the third instar
299 larval wing disc (Supp. Data 7). In particular, we evaluated the role of Wnt, Hedgehog, and
300 Notch signaling pathways by testing the expression patterns of four key proteins within these
301 pathways, including wingless (Wnt), patched (Hedgehog), engrailed (Hedgehog), and delta
302 (Notch). We found that 9/14 homologs, including 8/10 homologs showing severe wing
303 phenotypes or lethality, exhibited disruptions in at least one signaling pathway. For example, five
304 homologs with severe or lethal phenotypes showed disruptions of all four signaling pathways,
305 including AATF/Aatf, NCBP2/Cbp20, POLR3E/Sin, PPP4C/Pp4-19C, and KIF11/Klp61F (Fig.
306 7, Supp. Data 7). Our observations are in concordance with previous findings by Swarup and
307 colleagues, who showed that PPP4C/Pp4-19C is a candidate regulator of Wnt and Notch
308 signaling pathways in Drosophila larval wing discs [66]. Furthermore, two genes from the 3q29
309 region, DLG1/dlg1 and MFI2/Tsf2, showed altered expression patterns for delta and patched but
310 not for engrailed, indicating that they selectively interact with the Hedgehog as well as Notch
311 signaling pathway (Supp. Fig. 6). In fact, Six and colleagues showed that Dlg1 directly binds to
312 the PDZ-binding domain of Delta1 [67]. In contrast, ACACA/ACC and UQCRC2/UQCR-C2
313 showed no changes in expression patterns for any of the four signaling proteins tested,
314 suggesting that the observed lethality could be due to other cellular mechanisms (Supp. Fig. 6).
315 We conclude that several homologs disrupt the expression of key proteins in signaling pathways
15
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
316 in the developing larval wing discs, potentially accounting for the developmental defects
317 observed in the adult wings.
318
319 Connectivity patterns of CNV genes vary across human tissue-specific networks
320 We examined patterns of connectivity for the nine candidate genes, based on the disruptions of
321 signaling pathways identified in the developing Drosophila wing discs, within the context of
322 human brain, heart, and kidney-specific gene interaction networks [68]. These tissue-specific
323 networks were constructed using Bayesian classifier-generated probabilities for pairwise genetic
324 interactions based on co-expression data [68]. We calculated the lengths of the shortest paths
325 between each candidate gene and 267 Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog pathway genes in each
326 network as a proxy for connectivity (Supp. Data 8). In all three networks, each of the candidate
327 genes were connected to a majority of the tested signaling pathway genes (Fig. 8A, Supp. Fig.
328 7). Interestingly, we observed a higher connectivity (i.e. shorter path distances) between
329 candidate genes and Wnt and Hedgehog pathway genes in the brain-specific network compared
330 to the heart and kidney-specific networks (Fig. 8B). We further identified enrichments for genes
331 involved in specific biological processes among the connector genes that were located in the
332 shortest paths within neuronal and non-neuronal tissue-specific networks (Fig. 8C, Supp. Data
333 8). For example, axon-dendrite transport, dopaminergic signaling, and signal transduction
334 functions were enriched among connector genes only for the brain-specific network, while
335 organelle organization and protein ubiquitination were enriched among connector genes only for
336 kidney and heart networks (Fig. 8C). However, several core biological processes, such as cell
337 cycle, protein metabolism, transcriptional regulation, and RNA processing/splicing, were
338 enriched among connector genes within all three tissue-specific networks (Fig. 8C). Our analysis
16
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
339 highlights that human CNV genes potentially interact with developmental signaling pathways in
340 a ubiquitous manner, but may affect different biological processes in neuronal and non-neuronal
341 tissues.
17
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
342 DISCUSSION
343 We used the Drosophila wing as a model to assess how homologs of key CNV genes contribute
344 towards non-neuronal phenotypes. We tested fly homologs of 79 genes and identified multiple
345 homologs within each CNV region that exhibited strong phenotypes indicative of developmental
346 disruptions. Several themes have emerged from our study highlighting the importance of fly
347 homologs of CNV genes towards both global and tissue-specific phenotypes.
348 First, we found that fly homologs of CNV genes contribute towards developmental
349 phenotypes through ubiquitous roles in neuronal and non-neuronal tissues. Although we did not
350 study models for the entire CNV, nearly all individual fly homologs of CNV genes contribute to
351 wing-specific developmental defects. It is likely that these genes may also contribute to
352 additional phenotypes in other tissues that we did not assess. In fact, a subset of these homologs
353 also showed early lethality with ubiquitous knockdown in addition to severe or lethal wing-
354 specific phenotypes. However, we found no correlation between the severity of the eye and wing
355 phenotypes, suggesting tissue-specific effects of these homologs towards developmental defects.
356 In contrast, fly homologs of known neurodevelopmental genes generally showed milder wing
357 phenotypes compared with eye phenotypes, indicating a more neuronal role for these genes.
358 While our study only examined a subset of CNV genes with Drosophila homologs, phenotypic
359 data from knockout mouse models also support a global developmental role for individual CNV
360 genes. In fact, 44/130 knockout models of CNV genes within the Mouse Genome Informatics
361 (MGI) database [69] exhibited non-neuronal phenotypes, including 20 homologs of CNV genes
362 that showed both neuronal and non-neuronal phenotypes (Supp. Data 4). For example, knockout
363 mouse models of Dlg1-/- show defects in dendritic growth and branching in the developing
364 nervous system, in addition to craniofacial features and multiple kidney and urinary tract defects
18
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
365 [70–73]. Furthermore, Chapman and colleagues showed that knockout of Tbx6-/- caused defects
366 in mesodermal and neuronal differentiation early in development, leading to abnormal vascular,
367 tail bud, and neural tube morphology [74]. These observations further support our findings that
368 most fly homologs of CNV genes have a global role in development that could account for the
369 observed non-neuronal defects.
370 Second, based on tissue-specific phenotypes, we identified fly homologs of CNV genes
371 that are key regulators of conserved cellular processes important for development. For example,
372 9/10 homologs with severe or lethal adult wing phenotypes also exhibited defects in cell
373 proliferation and apoptosis during development. In fact, we found concordance between cellular
374 processes affected by wing and eye-specific knockdown of homologs of genes within 16p11.2
375 and 3q29 regions, including decreased proliferation for MAPK3/rl and increased apoptosis for
376 NCBP2/Cbp20 and DLG1/dlg1 [29,30]. While eye-specific knockdown of BDH1/CG8888
377 showed decreased cell proliferation in larval eye discs [30], we found increased cell proliferation
378 with wing-specific knockdown, suggesting a tissue-specific effect for this gene. Notably, at least
379 one fly homolog per CNV region showed defects in cell proliferation or apoptosis, suggesting
380 these cellular processes are important for development in both neuronal and non-neuronal
381 tissues. For example, ATXN2L/Atx2, SH2B1/Lnk, and CCDC101/Sgf29 each showed decreased
382 proliferation and increased apoptosis, suggesting a potential shared cellular mechanism for
383 several genes within the distal 16p11.2 deletion. Furthermore, a subset of these genes also
384 disrupted multiple signaling pathways, indicating a potential role for these homologs as key
385 regulators of developmental processes. We specifically identified five homologs whose
386 knockdown caused disruptions of Wnt, Notch, and hedgehog signaling pathways. Each of these
387 genes have important roles in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, transcription, or RNA processing,
19
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
388 based on Gene Ontology annotations [75,76]. In fact, we found that the RNA transport protein
389 NCBP2/Cbp20 [77], which we recently identified as a key modifier gene for the 3q29 deletion
390 [30], interfaced with all three signaling pathways. Furthermore, AATF disrupts apoptosis and
391 promotes cell cycle progression through displacement of HDAC1 [78–80], while PPP4C
392 promotes spindle organization at the centromeres during mitosis [81]. While we only evaluated
393 the role of these genes towards development in a single fly tissue, our additional analysis of
394 human gene interaction networks showed strong connectivity between the CNV genes and
395 signaling pathways in multiple neuronal and non-neuronal human tissues. In fact, cell cycle
396 genes were enriched among the connector genes in all three tissue-specific networks, further
397 emphasizing the role of cell cycle processes towards developmental phenotypes. Notably, we
398 also observed certain biological processes enriched among connector genes that were specific to
399 neuronal or non-neuronal tissues, indicating that genes within CNV regions may affect different
400 biological processes in a tissue-specific manner.
401 Overall, we show that fly homologs of most CNV genes contribute towards global
402 developmental phenotypes, although exactly how they contribute toward such phenotypes varies
403 between neuronal and non-neuronal tissues. Previous functional studies for CNV disorders have
404 focused primarily on identifying candidate genes for the observed neuronal phenotypes. In this
405 study, we identified several homologs of CNV genes that are responsible for non-neuronal
406 defects, as well as novel associations between these homologs and conserved biological
407 processes and pathways. We therefore propose that multiple genes within each CNV region
408 differentially disrupt conserved cellular pathways and biological processes in neuronal versus
409 non-neuronal tissues during development (Fig. 9). These results are in line with a multigenic
410 model for CNV disorders, as opposed to models where individual causative genes are
20
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
411 responsible for specific phenotypes [29,30,82]. Our study further exemplifies the utility of
412 evaluating non-neuronal phenotypes in addition to neuronal phenotypes in functional models of
413 individual genes and CNV regions associated with developmental disorders, including future
414 studies in mammalian or cellular model systems. Further studies exploring how CNV genes
415 interact with each other and with other developmental pathways could more fully explain the
416 conserved mechanisms underlying global developmental defects and identify potential
417 therapeutic targets for these disorders.
418
21
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
419 MATERIALS AND METHODS
420 Fly stocks and genetics
421 We tested 59 Drosophila homologs for 130 human genes that span across 10 pathogenic CNV
422 regions associated with neurodevelopmental disorders (1q21.1, 3q29, 7q11.23, 15q11.2, 15q13.3,
423 16p11.2, distal 16p11.2, 16p12.1, 16p13.11, and 17q12) [83] (Supp. Data 1). In addition, we
424 evaluated fly homologs of 20 human genes known to be in involved in neurodevelopmental
425 disorders [48,84] (Supp. Data 1). These include genes involved in beta-catenin signaling
426 pathway (5 genes), core genes implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders (8 genes), and genes
427 associated with microcephaly (7 genes) [85]. We used the DRSC Integrative Ortholog Prediction
428 Tool (DIOPT, v.7.1) to identify the fly homologs for each human gene [41] (Supp. Data 1).
429 To knockdown individual genes in specific tissues, we used RNA interference (RNAi)
430 and the UAS-GAL4 system (Fig. 1A), a well-established tool that allows for tissue-specific
431 expression of a gene of interest [86]. RNAi lines were obtained from Vienna Drosophila
432 Resource Center (VDRC) that include both GD and KK lines. We tested a total of 136 lines in
433 our final data analysis (Supp. Data 9), after eliminating KK lines with additional insertion that
434 drives the overexpression of the Tiptop (tio) transcription factor [87,88]. A complete list of stock
435 numbers and full genotypes for all RNAi lines used in this study is presented in Supp. Data 9.
436 We used the bxMS1096-GAL4/FM7c;;UAS-Dicer2/TM6B driver for wing-specific knockdown and
437 w1118;GMR-GAL4;UAS-Dicer2 driver (Claire Thomas, Penn State University) for eye-specific
438 knockdown of RNAi lines. Ubiquitous knockdown experiments were performed using the w;da-
439 GAL4;+ driver (Scott Selleck, Penn State University). For all experiments, we used appropriate
440 GD (w1118, VDRC# 60000) or KK (y,w1118; P{attP,y+,w3`}, VDRC# 60100) lines as controls to
441 compare against lines with knockdown of individual homologs. All fly lines were reared on
22
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
442 standard yeast Drosophila medium at room temperature. All crosses were set and maintained at
443 25°C, except for the eye knockdown experiments which were maintained at 30°C.
444
445 Phenotypic analysis of adult wing images
446 Adult progeny were isolated from crosses between RNAi lines and bxMS1096-GAL4 driver shortly
447 after eclosion, and kept at 25°C until day 2-5 (Fig. 1A). At that point, the progeny were frozen at
448 -80°C, and were then moved to -20°C prior to imaging and storage. Approximately 20-25
449 progeny, both male and female, were collected for each RNAi line tested. The adult wings were
450 plucked from frozen flies and mounted on a glass slide. The slides were covered with a coverslip
451 and sealed using clear nail polish. Adult wing images were captured using a Zeiss Discovery
452 V20 stereoscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA), with a ProgRes Speed XT Core 3 camera and
453 CapturePro v.2.8.8 software (Jenoptik AG, Jena, Germany) at 40X magnification.
454 For each non-lethal RNAi line, we scored the adult wing images for five qualitative
455 phenotypes, including wrinkled wing, discoloration, missing veins, ectopic veins, and bristle
456 planar polarity defects, on a scale of 1 (no phenotype) to 5 (lethal) (Fig. 2C). Lines showing
457 severely wrinkled wings or lethality were scored as 4 (severe) or 5 (lethal) for all five
458 phenotypes. We calculated the frequency of each phenotypic score (i.e. mild bristle polarity,
459 moderate discoloration) across all of the wing images for each line (Fig. 2A-B), and then
460 performed k-means clustering of these values to generate five clusters for overall wing
461 phenotypes (Fig. 1C). For quantitative analysis of wing phenotypes, we used the Fiji ImageJ
462 software [89] to calculate the wing area using the Measure Area tool, and calculated the lengths
463 of longitudinal veins L2, L3, L4, and L5 as well as the anterior and posterior crossveins (ACV
464 and PCV), by tracing individual veins using the Segmented Line tool (Fig. 3A, Supp. Data 2).
23
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
465 We determined discordant homologs when RNAi lines for the same homologs showed
466 inconsistent wing phenotypes. For each homolog with multiple RNAi lines, we checked
467 discordance among RNAi lines for no phenotype versus any qualitative or quantitative
468 phenotypes, followed by discordance for small or large wing measurement phenotypes (Supp.
469 Data 3).
470
471 Phenotypic analysis of adult eye images
472 We crossed RNAi lines with GMR-GAL4 to achieve eye-specific knockdown of homologs of
473 CNV and known neurodevelopmental genes. Adult 2-3-day old female progenies from the
474 crosses were collected, immobilized by freezing at -80°C, and then moved to -20°C prior to
475 imaging and storage. Flies were mounted on Blu-tac (Bostik Inc, Wauwatosa, WI, USA) and
476 imaged using an Olympus BX53 compound microscope with LMPLan N 20X air objective using
477 a DP73 c-mount camera at 0.5X magnification (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). CellSens
478 Dimension software (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to capture the eye images,
479 which were then stacked using the Zerene Stacker software (Zerene Systems LLC, Richland,
480 WA, USA). All eye images presented in this study are maximum projections of 20 consecutive
481 optical z-sections, at a z-step size of 12.1μm. Finally. we used our computational method called
482 Flynotyper (https://flynotyper.sourceforge.net) to quantify the degree of rough eye phenotypes
483 present due to knockdown of homologs of CNV or neurodevelopmental genes [48]. Flynotyper
484 scores for homologs of 16p11.2 and 3q29, as well as select core neurodevelopmental genes, were
485 derived from our previous studies [29,30,48].
486
487
24
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
488 Immunohistochemistry
489 Wing imaginal discs from third instar larvae were dissected in 1X PBS. The tissues were fixed
490 using 4% paraformaldehyde and blocked using 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). The wing discs
491 were incubated with primary antibodies using appropriate dilutions overnight at 4°C. We used
492 the following primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-pHistone3 (S10) (1:100 dilutions, Cell
493 Signaling 9706L), rabbit polyclonal anti-cleaved Drosophila Dcp1 (Asp216) (1:100 dilutions,
494 Cell Signaling 9578S), mouse monoclonal anti-Wingless (1:200 dilutions, DSHB, 4D4), mouse
495 monoclonal anti-Patched (1:50 dilutions, DSHB, Drosophila Ptc/APA1), mouse monoclonal
496 anti-Engrailed (1:50 dilutions, DSHB, 4D9), and mouse monoclonal anti-Delta (1:50 dilutions,
497 DSHB, C594.9B). Following incubation with primary antibodies, the wing discs were washed
498 and incubated with secondary antibodies at 1:200 dilution for two hours at room temperature.
499 We used the following secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 647 dye goat anti-mouse (A21235,
500 Molecular Probes by Invitrogen/Life Technologies), Alexa Fluor 568 dye goat anti-rabbit
501 (A11036, Molecular Probes by Invitrogen/Life Technologies), and Alexa Fluor 568 dye goat
502 anti-mouse (A11031, Molecular Probes by Invitrogen/Life Technologies). All washes and
503 antibody dilutions were made using 0.3% PBS with Triton-X.
504 Third instar larvae wing imaginal discs were mounted in Prolong Gold antifade reagent
505 with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, P36930) for imaging using an Olympus Fluoview FV1000
506 laser scanning confocal microscope (Olympus America, Lake Success, NY). Images were
507 acquired using FV10-ASW 2.1 software (Olympus, Waltham, MA, USA). Composite z-stack
508 images were analyzed using the Fiji ImageJ software [89]. To calculate the number of pH3
509 positive cells within the wing pouch area of the wing discs, we used the AnalyzeParticles
510 function in ImageJ, while manual counting was used to quantify Dcp1 positive cells. We note
25
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
511 that cell proliferation and apoptosis staining for NCBP2/Cbp20, DLG1/dlg1, BDH1/CG8888, and
512 FBXO45/Fsn were previously published[30].
513
514 Statistical analysis
515 Significance for the wing area and vein length measurements, cell counts for proliferation and
516 apoptosis, and Flynotyper scores were compared to appropriate GD or KK controls using one-
517 tailed or two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests. P-values for each set of experiments were corrected for
518 multiple testing using Benjamini-Hochberg correction. All statistical and clustering analysis was
519 performed using R v.3.6.1 (R Center for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Details for the
520 statistical tests performed for each dataset are provided in Supp. Data 10.
521
522 Expression data analysis
523 We obtained tissue-specific expression data for fly homologs of CNV genes from the FlyAtlas
524 Anatomical Microarray dataset [50]. Raw FPKM (fragments per kilobase of transcript per
525 million reads) expression values for each tissue were categorized as follows: <10, no expression;
526 10-100, low expression; 100-500, moderate expression; 500-1000, high expression; and >1000,
527 very high expression (Supp. Data 6). The median expression among midgut, hindgut,
528 Malpighian tube, and (for adult only) crop tissues was used to represent the overall gut
529 expression. We similarly obtained human tissue-specific expression data for CNV genes from
530 the GTEx Consortium v.1.2 RNA-Seq datasets [52]. Median TPM (transcripts per million reads)
531 expression values for each tissue were categorized as follows: <3, no expression; 3-10, low
532 expression; 10-25, moderate expression; 25-100, high expression; and >100, very high
533 expression (Supp. Data 6). The median expression among all brain and heart sub-tissues was
26
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
534 used to represent brain and heart expression, while the median expression among all colon,
535 esophagus, small intestine, and stomach sub-tissues was used to represent digestive tract
536 expression. Preferential gene expression for a particular tissue within the GTEx dataset was
537 determined if the expression values for that tissue were greater than the third quartile of all tissue
538 expression values for that gene, plus 1.5 times the interquartile range. Venn diagrams were
539 generated using the Venny webtool (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny) (Supp. Fig. 3).
540
541 Network analysis
542 We obtained human tissue-specific gene interaction networks for brain, heart, and kidney tissues
543 from the GIANT network database [68] within HumanBase (https://hb.flatironinstitute.org).
544 These networks were built by training a Bayesian classifier based on tissue-specific gene co-
545 expression datasets, which then assigned a posterior probability for interactions between each
546 pair of genes within the genome for a particular tissue. We downloaded the “Top edge” version
547 of each tissue-specific network, and extracted all gene pairs with posterior probabilities >0.2 to
548 create sub-networks containing the top ~0.5% tissue-specific interactions. Next, we identified the
549 shortest paths in each sub-network between human CNV genes whose fly homologs disrupted
550 signaling pathways in the larval wing disc and human genes within each disrupted pathway,
551 using the inverse of the posterior probability as weights for each edge in the network. Gene sets
552 from the human Notch (KEGG:map04330), Wnt (KEGG:map04310) and Hedgehog pathways
553 (KEGG:map04340) were curated from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)
554 pathway database [90]. Using the NetworkX Python package [91], we calculated the shortest
555 distance between each CNV gene and pathway gene, and identified connecting genes that were
556 within each of the shortest paths for the three tissue-specific networks. We further tested for
27
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
557 enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) terms (PantherDB GO-Slim) among the connector genes
558 using the PantherDB Gene List Analysis tool [92]. Lists of the shortest paths and connector
559 genes in each tissue-specific network, as well as enriched GO terms for sets of connector genes,
560 are provided in Supp. Data 8. Gene networks were visualized using Cytoscape v.3.7.2 [93]
561 using an edge-weighted spring embedded layout.
562
28
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
563 DATA AVAILABILITY
564 All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its
565 supplementary information files.
566
567 CODE AVAILABILITY
568 All source code for data analysis in this manuscript, including scripts for k-means clustering of
569 fly phenotypes and network connectivity of CNV and developmental pathway genes, are
570 available on the Girirajan lab GitHub page at https://github.com/girirajanlab/CNV_wing_project.
571
572 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
573 The authors thank Drs. Scott Selleck and Claire Thomas for providing fly lines for the
574 experiments, and members of the Girirajan Lab for their helpful discussions and comments on
575 the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH R01-GM121907 and resources from the Huck
576 Institutes of the Life Sciences to S.G., and NIH T32-GM102057 to M.J.
577
578 CONTRIBUTIONS
579 T.Y., M.J., S.Y., and S.G. designed the study. T.Y., S.Y., L.P., S.K., D.J.G., A.S., Y.M., J.I., and
580 Z.C.L. performed the functional experiments. T.Y. and M.J. performed the expression and
581 network experiments. T.Y., M.J., and S.G. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript with input
582 from all authors.
583
584 COMPETING OF INTERESTS
585 The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
29
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
586 REFERENCES 587 588 1. Girirajan S, Campbell CD, Eichler EE. Human Copy Number Variation and Complex 589 Genetic Disease. Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45: 203–226. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet- 590 102209-163544 591 2. Malhotra D, Sebat J. CNVs: harbingers of a rare variant revolution in psychiatric genetics. 592 Cell. 2012;148: 1223–1241. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.039 593 3. Cooper GM, Coe BP, Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Vu TH, Baker C, et al. A copy number 594 variation morbidity map of developmental delay. Nat Genet. 2011;43: 838–846. 595 doi:10.1038/ng.909 596 4. Zhang F, Gu W, Hurles ME, Lupski JR. Copy Number Variation in Human Health, 597 Disease, and Evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009;10: 451–481. 598 doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164217 599 5. Greenway SC, Pereira AC, Lin JC, Depalma SR, Israel SJ, Mesquita SM, et al. De novo 600 copy number variants identify new genes and loci in isolated sporadic tetralogy of Fallot. 601 Nat Genet. 2009;41: 931–935. doi:10.1038/ng.415 602 6. Glessner JT, Bick AG, Ito K et al. Increased Frequency of De Novo Copy Number 603 Variations in Congenital Heart Disease by Integrative Analysis of SNP Array and Exome 604 Sequence Data. Circ Res. 2014;115: 884–896. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.304458. 605 7. Sanna-Cherchi S, Kiryluk K, Burgess KE, Bodria M, Sampson MG, Hadley D, et al. 606 Copy-number disorders are a common cause of congenital kidney malformations. Am J 607 Hum Genet. 2012;91: 987–997. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.007 608 8. Zahnleiter D, Uebe S, Ekici AB, Hoyer J, Wiesener A, Wieczorek D, et al. Rare copy 609 number variants are a common cause of short stature. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003365. 610 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003365 611 9. Mefford HC, Sharp AJ, Baker C, Itsara A, Jiang Z, Buysse K, et al. Recurrent 612 rearrangements of chromosome 1q21.1 and variable pediatric phenotypes. N Engl J Med. 613 2008;359: 1685–99. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0805384 614 10. Brunetti-Pierri N, Berg JS, Scaglia F, Belmont J, Bacino CA, Sahoo T, et al. Recurrent 615 reciprocal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications associated with microcephaly or 616 macrocephaly and developmental and behavioral abnormalities. Nat Genet. 2008;40: 617 1466–1471. doi:10.1038/ng.279 618 11. Christiansen J, Dyck JD, Elyas BG, Lilley M, Bamforth JS, Hicks M, et al. Chromosome 619 1q21.1 contiguous gene deletion is associated with congenital heart disease. Circ Res. 620 2004;94: 1429–35. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000130528.72330.5c 621 12. Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;362: 239–52. 622 doi:10.1056/NEJMra0903074 623 13. Horev G, Ellegood J, Lerch JP, Son Y-EE, Muthuswamy L, Vogel H, et al. Dosage- 624 dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 625 2011;108: 17076–17081. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114042108 626 14. Pucilowska J, Vithayathil J, Tavares EJ, Kelly C, Karlo JC, Landreth GE. The 16p11.2 627 Deletion Mouse Model of Autism Exhibits Altered Cortical Progenitor Proliferation and 628 Brain Cytoarchitecture Linked to the ERK MAPK Pathway. J Neurosci. 2015;35: 3190– 629 3200. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4864-13.2015 630 15. Portmann T, Yang M, Mao R, Panagiotakos G, Ellegood J, Dolen G, et al. Behavioral
30
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
631 abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 632 deletion syndrome. Cell Rep. 2014;7: 1077–1092. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.036 633 16. Rutkowski TP, Purcell RH, Pollak RM, Grewenow SM, Gafford GM, Malone T, et al. 634 Behavioral changes and growth deficits in a CRISPR engineered mouse model of the 635 schizophrenia-associated 3q29 deletion. Mol Psychiatry. 2019. doi:10.1038/s41380-019- 636 0413-5 637 17. Baba M, Yokoyama K, Seiriki K, Naka Y, Matsumura K, Kondo M, et al. Psychiatric- 638 disorder-related behavioral phenotypes and cortical hyperactivity in a mouse model of 639 3q29 deletion syndrome. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44: 2125–2135. 640 doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0441-5 641 18. Arbogast T, Ouagazzal A-M, Chevalier C, Kopanitsa M, Afinowi N, Migliavacca E, et al. 642 Reciprocal Effects on Neurocognitive and Metabolic Phenotypes in Mouse Models of 643 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Syndromes. PLOS Genet. 2016;12: e1005709. 644 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005709 645 19. Haller M, Au J, O’Neill M, Lamb DJ. 16p11.2 transcription factor MAZ is a dosage- 646 sensitive regulator of genitourinary development. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115: 647 201716092. doi:10.1073/pnas.1716092115 648 20. Yadav S, Oses-Prieto JA, Peters CJ, Zhou J, Pleasure SJ, Burlingame AL, et al. TAOK2 649 Kinase Mediates PSD95 Stability and Dendritic Spine Maturation through Septin7 650 Phosphorylation. Neuron. 2017;93: 379–393. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.006 651 21. Richter M, Murtaza N, Scharrenberg R, White SH, Johanns O, Walker S, et al. Altered 652 TAOK2 activity causes autism-related neurodevelopmental and cognitive abnormalities 653 through RhoA signaling. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24: 1329–1350. doi:10.1038/s41380-018- 654 0025-5 655 22. Golzio C, Willer J, Talkowski ME, Oh EC, Taniguchi Y, Jacquemont S, et al. KCTD13 is 656 a major driver of mirrored neuroanatomical phenotypes of the 16p11.2 copy number 657 variant. Nature. 2012;485: 363–367. doi:10.1038/nature11091 658 23. Escamilla CO, Filonova I, Walker AK, Xuan ZX, Holehonnur R, Espinosa F, et al. 659 Kctd13 deletion reduces synaptic transmission via increased RhoA. Nature. 2017;551: 660 227–231. doi:10.1038/nature24470 661 24. Ip JPK, Nagakura I, Petravicz J, Li K, Wiemer EAC, Sur M. Major vault protein, a 662 candidate gene in 16p11.2 microdeletion syndrome, is required for the homeostatic 663 regulation of visual cortical plasticity. J Neurosci. 2018;38: 2017–2034. 664 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2034-17.2018 665 25. Dickinson ME, Flenniken AM, Ji X, Teboul L, Wong MD, White JK, et al. High- 666 throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature. 2016;537: 508–514. 667 doi:10.1038/nature19356 668 26. Wangler MF, Yamamoto S, Bellen HJ. Fruit flies in biomedical research. Genetics. 669 2015;199: 639–653. doi:10.1534/genetics.114.171785 670 27. Chien S. Homophila: human disease gene cognates in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 671 2002;30: 149–151. doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.149 672 28. Reiter LT, Potocki L, Chien S, Gribskov M, Bier E. A systematic analysis of human 673 disease-associated gene sequences in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res. 2001;11: 674 1114–1125. doi:10.1101/gr.169101 675 29. Iyer J, Singh MD, Jensen M, Patel P, Pizzo L, Huber E, et al. Pervasive genetic
31
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
676 interactions modulate neurodevelopmental defects of the autism-Associated 16p11.2 677 deletion in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 2548. doi:10.1038/s41467- 678 018-04882-6 679 30. Singh MD, Jensen M, Lasser M, Huber E, Yusuff T, Pizzo L, et al. NCBP2 modulates 680 neurodevelopmental defects of the 3q29 deletion in Drosophila and X. laevis models. 681 bioRxiv. 2019; 614750. doi:10.1101/614750 682 31. Molnar C, Resnik-Docampo M, F. M, Martin M, F. C, de Celis JF. Signalling Pathways in 683 Development and Human Disease: A Drosophila Wing Perspective. Human Genetic 684 Diseases. InTech; 2011. doi:10.5772/23858 685 32. Dworkin I, Gibson G. Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-β 686 signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 687 2006;173: 1417–1431. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.053868 688 33. Testa ND, Dworkin I. The sex-limited effects of mutations in the EGFR and TGF-β 689 signaling pathways on shape and size sexual dimorphism and allometry in the Drosophila 690 wing. Dev Genes Evol. 2016;226: 159–171. doi:10.1007/s00427-016-0534-7 691 34. Yan SJ, Gu Y, Li WX, Fleming RJ. Multiple signaling pathways and a selector protein 692 sequentially regulate Drosophila wing development. Development. 2004;131: 285–298. 693 doi:10.1242/dev.00934 694 35. Strigini M, Cohen SM. A Hedgehog activity gradient contributes to AP axial patterning of 695 the Drosophila wing. Development. 1997;124: 4697–4705. 696 36. Diaz de la Loza MC, Thompson BJ. Forces shaping the Drosophila wing. Mech. Dev. 697 2017;144: 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2016.10.003 698 37. Bier E. Drosophila, the golden bug, emerges as a tool for human genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 699 2005;6: 9–23. doi:10.1038/nrg1503 700 38. Wu Y, Bolduc F V, Bell K, Tully T, Fang Y, Sehgal A, et al. A Drosophila model for 701 Angelman syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105: 12399–12404. 702 doi:10.1073/pnas.0805291105 703 39. Yamamoto S, Jaiswal M, Charng WL, Gambin T, Karaca E, Mirzaa G, et al. A drosophila 704 genetic resource of mutants to study mechanisms underlying human genetic diseases. Cell. 705 2014;159: 200–214. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.002 706 40. Kochinke K, Zweier C, Nijhof B, Fenckova M, Cizek P, Honti F, et al. Systematic 707 Phenomics Analysis Deconvolutes Genes Mutated in Intellectual Disability into 708 Biologically Coherent Modules. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98: 149–164. 709 doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.024 710 41. Hu Y, Flockhart I, Vinayagam A, Bergwitz C, Berger B, Perrimon N, et al. An integrative 711 approach to ortholog prediction for disease-focused and other functional studies. BMC 712 Bioinformatics. 2011;12: 357. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-357 713 42. Capdevila J, Guerrero I. Targeted expression of the signaling molecule decapentaplegic 714 induces pattern duplications and growth alterations in Drosophila wings. EMBO J. 715 1994;13: 4459–4468. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06768.x 716 43. Lindström R, Lindholm P, Palgi M, Saarma M, Heino TI. In vivo screening reveals 717 interactions between Drosophila Manf and genes involved in the mitochondria and the 718 ubiquinone synthesis pathway. BMC Genet. 2017;18: 52. doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0509-3 719 44. Nielsen J, Fejgin K, Sotty F, Nielsen V, Mørk A, Christoffersen CT, et al. A mouse model 720 of the schizophrenia-associated 1q21.1 microdeletion syndrome exhibits altered
32
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
721 mesolimbic dopamine transmission. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7: 1261. doi:10.1038/s41398- 722 017-0011-8 723 45. Huang H, Potter CJ, Tao W, Li DM, Brogiolo W, Hafen E, et al. PTEN affects cell size, 724 cell proliferation and apoptosis during Drosophila eye development. Development. 725 1999;126: 5365–5372. doi:10.5167/uzh-627 726 46. Toyo-oka K, Mori D, Yano Y, Shiota M, Iwao H, Goto H, et al. Protein phosphatase 4 727 catalytic subunit regulates Cdk1 activity and microtubule organization via NDEL1 728 dephosphorylation. J Cell Biol. 2008;180: 1133–1147. doi:10.1083/jcb.200705148 729 47. Ohsugi M, Adachi K, Horai R, Kakuta S, Sudo K, Kotaki H, et al. Kid-Mediated 730 Chromosome Compaction Ensures Proper Nuclear Envelope Formation. Cell. 2008;132: 731 771–782. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.029 732 48. Iyer J, Wang Q, Le T, Pizzo L, Grönke S, Ambegaokar SS, et al. Quantitative assessment 733 of eye phenotypes for functional genetic studies using Drosophila melanogaster. G3 734 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2016;6: 1427–1437. doi:10.1534/g3.116.027060 735 49. Rosenberg MJ, Agarwala R, Bouffard G, Davis J, Fiermonte G, Hilliard MS, et al. Mutant 736 deoxynucleotide carrier is associated with congenital microcephaly. Nat Genet. 2002;32: 737 175–179. doi:10.1038/ng948 738 50. Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JAT. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila 739 melanogaster models of human disease. Nat. Genet. 2007;39: 715–720. 740 doi:10.1038/ng2049 741 51. Claes L, Del-Favero J, Ceulemans B, Lagae L, Van Broeckhoven C, De Jonghe P. De 742 novo mutations in the sodium-channel gene SCN1A cause severe myoclonic epilepsy of 743 infancy. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68: 1327–1332. doi:10.1086/320609 744 52. Ardlie KG, DeLuca DS, Segrè A V., Sullivan TJ, Young TR, Gelfand ET, et al. The 745 Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in 746 humans. Science. 2015;348: 648–660. doi:10.1126/science.1262110 747 53. Ernst C. Proliferation and Differentiation Deficits are a Major Convergence Point for 748 Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39: 290–299. 749 doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.03.001 750 54. Marchetto MC, Belinson H, Tian Y, Freitas BC, Fu C, Vadodaria KC, et al. Altered 751 proliferation and networks in neural cells derived from idiopathic autistic individuals. Mol 752 Psychiatry. 2017;22: 820–835. doi:10.1038/mp.2016.95 753 55. Wei H, Alberts I, Li X. The apoptotic perspective of autism. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2014;36: 754 13–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.04.004 755 56. Hartl TA, Scott MP. Wing tips: The wing disc as a platform for studying Hedgehog 756 signaling. Methods. 2014;68: 199–206. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.002 757 57. de Celis JF, García-Bellido A. Roles of the Notch gene in Drosophila wing 758 morphogenesis. Mech Dev. 1994;46: 109–122. doi:10.1016/0925-4773(94)90080-9 759 58. Raftery LA, Umulis DM. Regulation of BMP activity and range in Drosophila wing 760 development. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24: 158–65. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2011.11.004 761 59. Diaz-Benjumea FJ, Cohen SM. Serrate signals through Notch to establish a Wingless- 762 dependent organizer at the dorsal/ventral compartment boundary of the Drosophila wing. 763 Development. 1995;121: 4215–4225. 764 60. Becam I, Milán M. A permissive role of Notch in maintaining the DV affinity boundary of 765 the Drosophila wing. Dev Biol. 2008;322: 190–198. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.028
33
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
766 61. Zecca M, Basler K, Struhl G. Sequential organizing activities of engrailed, hedgehog and 767 decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Development. 1995;121: 2265–2278. 768 doi:10.5167/uzh-1053 769 62. Tabata T, Kornberg TB. Hedgehog is a signaling protein with a key role in patterning 770 Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell. 1994;76: 89–102. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90175-9 771 63. O ’ Roak BJ, Vives L, Girirajan S, Karakoc E, Krumm N, Coe BP, et al. Sporadic autism 772 exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature. 773 2012;485: 246–250. doi:10.1038/nature10989 774 64. Hahn H, Wicking C, Zaphiropoulos PG, Gailani MR, Shanley S, Chidambaram A, et al. 775 Mutations of the human homolog of drosophila patched in the nevoid basal cell carcinoma 776 syndrome. Cell. 1996;85: 841–851. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81268-4 777 65. Johnson RL, Rothman AL, Xie J, Goodrich L V., Bare JW, Bonifas JM, et al. Human 778 homolog of patched, a candidate gene for the basal cell nevus syndrome. Science. 779 1996;272: 1668–1671. doi:10.1126/science.272.5268.1668 780 66. Swarup S, Pradhan-Sundd T, Verheyen EM. Genome-wide identification of phospho- 781 regulators of Wnt signaling in Drosophila. Development. 2015;142: 1502–1515. 782 doi:10.1242/dev.116715 783 67. Six EM, Ndiaye D, Sauer G, Laâbi Y, Athman R, Cumano A, et al. The Notch ligand 784 Delta1 recruits Dlg1 at cell-cell contacts and regulates cell migration. J Biol Chem. 785 2004;279: 55818–55826. doi:10.1074/jbc.M408022200 786 68. Greene CS, Krishnan A, Wong AK, Ricciotti E, Zelaya RA, Himmelstein DS, et al. 787 Understanding multicellular function and disease with human tissue-specific networks. 788 Nat Genet. 2015;47: 569–576. doi:10.1038/ng.3259 789 69. Bult CJ, Blake JA, Smith CL, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Mouse Genome Database Group. 790 Mouse Genome Database (MGD) 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: D801–D806. 791 doi:10.1093/nar/gky1056 792 70. Zhou W, Zhang L, Guoxiang X, Mojsilovic-Petrovic J, Takamaya K, Sattler R, et al. 793 GluR1 controls dendrite growth through its binding partner, SAP97. J Neurosci. 2008;28: 794 10220–10233. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3434-08.2008 795 71. Iizuka-Kogo A, Ishidao T, Akiyama T, Senda T. Abnormal development of urogenital 796 organs in Dlgh1-deficient mice. Development. 2007;134: 1799–1807. 797 doi:10.1242/dev.02830 798 72. Mahoney ZX, Sammut B, Xavier RJ, Cunningham J, Go G, Brim KL, et al. Discs-large 799 homolog 1 regulates smooth muscle orientation in the mouse ureter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U 800 S A. 2006;103: 19872–19877. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609326103 801 73. Caruana G, Bernstein A. Craniofacial dysmorphogenesis including cleft palate in mice 802 with an insertional mutation in the discs large gene. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21: 1475–1483. 803 doi:10.1128/MCB.21.5.1475-1483.2001 804 74. Chapman DL, Papaioannou VE. Three neural tubes in mouse embryos with mutations in 805 the T-box gene Tbx6. Nature. 1998;391: 695–697. doi:10.1038/35624 806 75. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: 807 Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000;25: 25–29. doi:10.1038/75556 808 76. The Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing 809 strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: D330–D338. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1055 810 77. Pabis M, Neufeld N, Shav-Tal Y, Neugebauer KM. Binding properties and dynamic
34
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
811 localization of an alternative isoform of the cap-binding complex subunit CBP20. 812 Nucleus. 2010;1: 412–421. doi:10.4161/nucl.1.5.12839 813 78. Di Padova M, Bruno T, De Nicola F, Iezzi S, D’Angelo C, Gallo R, et al. Che-1 arrests 814 human colon carcinoma cell proliferation by displacing HDAC1 from the p21WAF1/CIP1 815 promoter. J Biol Chem. 2003;278: 36496–36504. doi:10.1074/jbc.M306694200 816 79. Bruno T, De Angelis R, De Nicola F, Barbato C, Di Padova M, Corbi N, et al. Che-1 817 affects cell growth by interfering with the recruitment of HDAC1 by Rb. Cancer Cell. 818 2002;2: 387–399. doi:10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00182-4 819 80. Page G, Lödige I, Kögel D, Scheidtmann KH. AATF, a novel transcription factor that 820 interacts with Dlk/ZIP kinase and interferes with apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 1999;462: 187–91. 821 doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01529-x 822 81. Sumiyoshi E, Sugimoto A, Yamamoto M. Protein phosphatase 4 is required for 823 centrosome maturation in mitosis and sperm meiosis in C. elegans. J Cell Sci. 2002;115: 824 1403–1410. 825 82. Jensen M, Girirajan S. An interaction-based model for neuropsychiatric features of copy- 826 number variants. PLoS Genet. 2019;15: e1007879. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007879 827 83. Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Coe BP, Parikh S, Friedman N, Goldstein A, et al. Phenotypic 828 Heterogeneity of Genomic Disorders and Rare Copy-Number Variants. N Engl J Med. 829 2012;367: 1321–1331. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1200395 830 84. Coe BP, Girirajan S, Eichler EE. A genetic model for neurodevelopmental disease. Curr 831 Opin Neurobiol. 2012;22: 829–836. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.04.007 832 85. Nicholas AK, Swanson EA, Cox JJ, Karbani G, Malik S, Springell K, et al. The molecular 833 landscape of ASPM mutations in primary microcephaly. J Med Genet. 2009;46: 249–253. 834 doi:10.1136/jmg.2008.062380 835 86. Brand AH, Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and 836 generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993;118: 401–415. 837 doi:10.1101/lm.1331809 838 87. Green EW, Fedele G, Giorgini F, Kyriacou CP. A Drosophila RNAi collection is subject 839 to dominant phenotypic effects. Nat Methods. 2014;11: 222–223. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2856 840 88. Vissers JHA, Manning SA, Kulkarni A, Harvey KF. A Drosophila RNAi library 841 modulates Hippo pathway-dependent tissue growth. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 10368. 842 doi:10.1038/ncomms10368 843 89. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: An 844 open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9: 676–682. 845 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 846 90. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Morishima K, Tanabe M. New approach for 847 understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: D590–D595. 848 doi:10.1093/nar/gky962 849 91. Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function 850 using NetworkX. 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008). 2008. pp. 11–15. 851 Available: http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/paper_2 852 92. Mi H, Huang X, Muruganujan A, Tang H, Mills C, Kang D, et al. PANTHER version 11: 853 Expanded annotation data from Gene Ontology and Reactome pathways, and data analysis 854 tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45: D183–D189. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1138 855 93. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: A
35
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
856 software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. 857 Genome Res. 2003;13: 2498–2504. doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 858
36
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
859 FIGURE LEGENDS
860 Figure 1. Targeted analysis to identify global developmental phenotypes with knockdown
861 of homologs of CNV genes. (A) Strategy for identifying non-neuronal phenotypes and
862 underlying cellular mechanisms for homologs of CNV and known neurodevelopmental genes
863 using the fly wing as a model system. We evaluated 59 Drosophila homologs of genes within 10
864 CNV regions and 20 known neurodevelopmental genes (79 total homologs). Using the UAS-
865 GAL4 system with wing-specific bxMS1096 driver, we knocked down 136 individual RNAi lines
866 for the CNV and neurodevelopmental homologs, and evaluated qualitative and quantitative
867 phenotypes. We next clustered RNAi lines based on severity of qualitative phenotypes, and
868 compared adult wing phenotypes to phenotypes observed with ubiquitous and eye-specific
869 knockdown of homologs. Furthermore, we evaluated underlying cellular mechanisms for the
870 observed wing-specific phenotypes, and examined the connectivity patterns of candidate
871 homologs for developmental phenotypes in multiple human tissue-specific networks. (B)
872 Representative brightfield images of adult wing phenotype severity observed with knockdown of
873 homologs of CNV genes, based on clustering analysis, are shown. (C) Heatmap with k-means
874 clustering of qualitative phenotypes in adult female wings across 136 RNAi lines is shown. The
875 color of each cell represents the frequency of individual fly wings (n=20-25 adult wings) for
876 each RNAi line (x-axis) that show a specific severity (no phenotype, mild, moderate, severe,
877 lethal) for the five qualitative phenotypes assessed (y-axis; wrinkled wings, ectopic veins,
878 missing veins, discoloration, bristle planar polarity), as detailed in Supp. Data 2. Based on these
879 data, we identified clusters for no phenotype (n=75 lines), mild (n=24 lines), moderate (n=10
880 lines), severe (n=21 lines), and lethal (n=6 lines). (D) Summary table of qualitative and
881 quantitative adult wing phenotypes for all tested RNAi lines of homologs of CNV and
37
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
882 neurodevelopmental genes. Quantitative phenotype totals do not include lethal RNAi lines for
883 both area and vein length. In addition, L3 vein length totals do not include severe RNAi lines.
884
885 Figure 2. Qualitative adult wing phenotypes of Drosophila homologs of CNV and
886 neurodevelopmental genes. Heatmaps representing the five qualitative adult wing phenotypes
887 for all 136 RNAi lines, with (A) all 59 tested homologs for 10 CNV regions and (B) 20
888 homologs for neurodevelopmental genes (β-catenin, core neurodevelopmental genes, and
889 microcephaly genes), are shown. The color of each cell represents the frequency of each of the
890 five qualitative phenotypes by severity (wrinkled wings, WR; ectopic veins, EV; missing veins,
891 MV; discoloration, DC; bristle planar polarity, BP), ranging from no phenotype to lethal. (C)
892 Representative brightfield images of adult fly wings (scale bar = 500µm) with wing-specific
893 knockdown of homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes showing the five assessed
894 qualitative phenotypes, including discoloration, wrinkled wings, bristle polarity, ectopic veins,
895 and missing veins are shown. The panels in the bxMS1096-GAL4 control and C6836KK112485 images
896 highlight bristle planar polarity phenotypes for the representative images. Black arrowheads
897 highlight ectopic veins and white arrowheads highlight missing veins. Genotypes for the images
898 are: w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-RphGD7330 RNAi/+;UAS-
899 Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-CG15528KK107736 RNAi/+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-
900 GAL4;UAS-CG6836KK112485 RNAi/+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+;UAS-
901 CG14182GD2738 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, and w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-kisKK100890 RNAi/+; UAS-
902 Dicer2/+.
903
38
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
904 Figure 3. Quantitative adult wing phenotypes of Drosophila homologs of CNV and
905 neurodevelopmental genes. (A) Representative brightfield images of adult fly wings (scale bar
906 = 500µm) with wing-specific knockdown of homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes
907 with size defects are shown. The bxMS1096-GAL4 control image highlights the six veins, including
908 longitudinal veins L2, L3, L4, and L5 as well as the anterior and posterior crossveins (ACV and
909 PCV), that were measured for quantitative analysis. The dotted line in the control image
910 represents the total wing area calculated for each RNAi line. Genotypes for the images are:
911 w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-Fmo-2KK109203 RNAi/+; UAS-
912 Dicer2/+, and w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+;UAS-TrpmGD4541 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2. (B) Boxplot of L3
913 vein lengths for knockdown of select homologs in adult fly wings (n = 9-91, *p < 0.05, two-
914 tailed Mann–Whitney test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction). Vein measurements for all
915 other longitudinal veins and crossveins (ACV and PCV) for these lines are represented in Supp
916 Fig. 2. (C) Boxplot of wing areas for knockdown of select homologs in adult fly wings (n = 9-
917 91, *p < 0.05, two-tailed Mann–Whitney test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction). All boxplots
918 indicate median (center line), 25th and 75th percentiles (bounds of box), and minimum and
919 maximum (whiskers), with red dotted lines representing the control median.
920
921 Figure 4. Comparison of wing-specific, eye-specific, and ubiquitous knockdown of
922 homologs of CNV and known neurodevelopmental genes. (A) Heatmap with the penetrance
923 of phenotypes with ubiquitous knockdown (da–GAL4) of select homologs of CNV genes,
924 compared to their adult wing-specific (bxMS1096–GAL4) phenotypic severity is shown. (B)
925 Boxplots of Flynotyper-derived phenotypic scores for adult eyes with eye-specific knockdown
926 (GMR-GAL4) of select homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes, normalized as fold-
39
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
927 change (FC) to control values (n = 7–40, *p < 0.05, one-tailed Mann–Whitney test with
928 Benjamini-Hochberg correction). The boxplots are arranged by severity of adult wing
929 phenotypes observed for each RNAi line, while the Flynotyper phenotypic scores are categorized
930 into four severity categories: no change (0–1.1 FC), mild (1.1–1.5 FC), moderate (1.5–2.0 FC),
931 and severe (>2.0 FC). (C) Boxplot showing the average eye phenotypic scores for 66 RNAi lines
932 of select homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes, normalized as fold-change (FC) to
933 control values, by wing phenotypic category (n=4–30 RNAi lines per group). We did not observe
934 any significant changes in eye phenotype severity across the five wing phenotypic categories
935 (Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, p=0.567, df = 5, χ2 = 3.881). Examples of average eye phenotypic
936 scores for RNAi lines with no phenotype (paraGD3392_1), mild (rlKK115768), and lethal (dlg1GD4689)
937 wing phenotype severity are highlighted in the graph. All boxplots indicate median (center line),
938 25th and 75th percentiles (bounds of box), and minimum and maximum (whiskers), with red
939 dotted lines representing the control median. (D) Representative brightfield adult eye (scale
940 bar = 100 µm) and adult wing (scale bar = 500µm) images with tissue-specific knockdown of
941 homologs of CNV genes are shown. Genotypes for the eye images are: w1118;GMR-GAL4/+;
942 UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118;GMR-GAL4/UAS-LnkKK105731 RNAi; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118;GMR-
943 GAL4/UAS-mEFTu1GD16961 RNAi; UAS-Dicer2/+. Genotypes for the wing images are:
944 w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4; UAS-LnkKK105731 RNAi/+; UAS-
945 Dicer2/+, and w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4; UAS-mEFTu1GD16961 RNAi/+; UAS-Dicer2/+.
946
947 Figure 5. Expression patterns of Drosophila homologs and human CNV and
948 neurodevelopmental genes across multiple tissues. (A) Heatmap with expression of fly
949 homologs of select CNV and neurodevelopmental genes in multiple Drosophila larval and adult
40
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
950 tissues, derived from the FlyAtlas Anatomical Microarray dataset, compared with adult wing
951 phenotype severity, is shown. Expression values are grouped into no expression (<10 fragments
952 per kilobase of transcript per million reads, or FPKM), low (10–100 FPKM), moderate (100–500
953 FPKM), high (500–1000 FPKM), and very high (>1000 FPKM) expression categories. (B)
954 Heatmap with expression of select human CNV and neurodevelopmental genes in multiple adult
955 tissues, derived from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) dataset v.1.2, is shown.
956 Expression values are grouped into no expression (<3 transcripts per million reads, or TPM), low
957 (3–10 TPM), moderate (10–25 TPM), high (25–100 TPM), and very high (>100 TPM)
958 expression categories. X symbols denote preferential expression in a particular tissue (see
959 Methods). Expression data for all CNV and neurodevelopmental genes are provided in Supp.
960 Data 6.
961
962 Figure 6. Drosophila homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes show altered levels
963 of apoptosis and proliferation. (A) Larval imaginal wing discs (scale bar = 50 µm) stained with
964 nuclear marker DAPI, apoptosis marker dcp1, and cell proliferation marker pH3 illustrate altered
965 levels of apoptosis and cell proliferation due to wing-specific knockdown of select fly homologs
966 of CNV genes. We quantified the number of stained cells within the wing pouch of the wing disc
967 (white box), which becomes the adult wing. Additional representative images of select homologs
968 are presented in Supp Fig. 5. Genotypes for the wing images are: w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-
969 Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-AatfGD7229 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-
970 Pp4-19CGD9561/+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Atx2GD11562 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2,
971 and w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-SinGD7027 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2. (B) Box plot of dcp1-positive
972 cells in larval wing discs with knockdown of select fly homologs of CNV and
41
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
973 neurodevelopmental genes, normalized to controls (n = 7–18, *p < 0.05, two-tailed Mann–
974 Whitney test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction). We note that several RNAi lines showed
975 severe dcp1 staining across the entire wing disc and could not be quantified. The number of dcp1
976 positive cells were calculated manually. (C) Box plot of pH3-positive cells in the larval wing
977 discs with knockdown of select fly homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes,
978 normalized to controls (n = 6–18, *p < 0.05, two-tailed Mann–Whitney test with Benjamini-
979 Hochberg correction). The number of pH3 positive cells were calculated using the
980 AnalyzeParticles function in ImageJ. All boxplots indicate median (center line), 25th and 75th
981 percentiles (bounds of box), and minimum and maximum (whiskers), with red dotted lines
982 representing the control median.
983
984 Figure 7. Candidate Drosophila homologs of genes within CNV regions interact with
985 conserved signaling pathways. Larval imaginal wing discs (scale bar = 50 µm) stained with (A)
986 wingless, (B) patched, (C) engrailed, and (D) delta illustrate disrupted expression patterns for
987 proteins located within the Wnt (wingless), Hedgehog (patched and engrailed), and Notch (delta)
988 signaling pathways due to wing-specific knockdown of select fly homologs of CNV and
989 neurodevelopmental genes. Dotted yellow boxes represent expected expression patterns for
990 signaling proteins in bxMS1096-GAL4 control images. White arrowheads and dotted white boxes
991 highlight disruptions in expression patterns of signaling proteins with knockdown of CNV or
992 neurodevelopmental genes. Additional representative images of select homologs are presented in
993 Supp Fig. 7. Genotypes for the wing images are: w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Dicer2/+,
994 w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-Pp4-19CGD9561/+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-
995 Cbp20KK109448/+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-SinGD7027 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2,
42
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
996 w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-AatfGD7229 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, and w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-
997 Klp61FGD14149/+; UAS-Dicer2/+.
998
999 Figure 8. Connectivity of human CNV genes with conserved signaling pathway genes in
1000 human tissue-specific networks. (A) Representative diagrams of eight human CNV and
1001 neurodevelopmental genes whose fly homologs disrupt the Notch signaling pathway and 57
1002 human Notch signaling genes within kidney, heart, and brain-specific gene interaction networks
1003 are shown. Yellow nodes represent CNV and neurodevelopmental genes, pink nodes represent
1004 Notch signaling pathway genes, and green nodes represent connector genes within the shortest
1005 paths between CNV and Notch pathway genes. (B) Violin plots showing the average
1006 connectivity (i.e. inverse of shortest path lengths) of CNV genes to genes in Hedgehog, Notch,
1007 and Wnt signaling pathways across the tested tissue-specific networks (n=322–810 pairwise
1008 interactions, *p < 0.05, two-tailed Welch’s t-test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction). (C)
1009 Table showing enriched clusters of Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process terms for connector
1010 genes observed for each signaling pathway in the three tested tissue-specific networks,
1011 categorized by enrichments in ubiquitous, neuronal, and non-neuronal tissues (p<0.05, Fisher’s
1012 Exact test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction).
1013
1014 Figure 9. A multigenic model for neuronal and non-neuronal phenotypes associated with
1015 pathogenic CNVs. Schematic of a multigenic model for neuronal and non-neuronal phenotypes
1016 associated with pathogenic CNVs. While a subset of genes within CNV regions contribute
1017 towards tissue-specific phenotypes, a majority of genes contribute towards both neuronal and
43
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1018 non-neuronal phenotypes through disruption of developmental signaling pathways and global
1019 biological processes.
44
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1020 SUPPLEMENTARY LEGENDS
1021 Supplementary Figure 1. Quantitative vein length phenotypes for select Drosophila
1022 homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes. Boxplots of longitudinal veins (A) L2, (B)
1023 L4, (C) L5, and (D) anterior crossvein (ACV) and (E) posterior crossvein (PCV) lengths for
1024 knockdown of select homologs in adult fly wings (n = 9-91, *p < 0.05, two-tailed Mann–
1025 Whitney test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction). All boxplots indicate median (center line),
1026 25th and 75th percentiles (bounds of box), and minimum and maximum (whiskers), with red
1027 dotted lines representing the control median.
1028
1029 Supplementary Figure 2. Comparisons of eye-specific and wing-specific knockdowns for
1030 select Drosophila homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes. Boxplots of Flynotyper-
1031 derived phenotypic scores for 66 tested adult eyes with eye-specific knockdown (GMR-GAL4) of
1032 select homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes, normalized as fold-change (FC) to
1033 control values (n = 1–40, *p < 0.05, one-tailed Mann–Whitney test with Benjamini-Hochberg
1034 correction). RNAi lines that do not show any observable qualitative adult wing phenotypes,
1035 including lines that show wing measurement phenotypes, are represented in (A), and RNAi lines
1036 with observable mild to lethal qualitative wing phenotypes are represented in (B). All boxplots
1037 indicate median (center line), 25th and 75th percentiles (bounds of box), and minimum and
1038 maximum (whiskers), with red dotted lines representing the control median.
1039
1040 Supplementary Figure 3. Expression of Drosophila homologs of CNV and
1041 neurodevelopmental genes in larval and adult tissues. Venn diagrams representing the
1042 number of 76/77 tested fly homologs for CNV and neurodevelopmental genes expressed (>10
45
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1043 fragments per kilobase of transcript per million reads, or FPKM) in (A) larval (central nervous
1044 system or CNS, gut, trachea, and fat body) and (B) adult tissues (brain, gut, heart and fat body),
1045 are shown.
1046
1047 Supplementary Figure 4. Additional Drosophila homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental
1048 genes show altered levels of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Larval imaginal wing discs
1049 (scale bar = 50 µm) stained with nuclear marker DAPI, apoptosis marker dcp1, and cell
1050 proliferation marker pH3 illustrate altered levels of cell proliferation and apoptosis due to wing-
1051 specific knockdown of select fly homologs of CNV genes. We examined changes in the number
1052 of stained cells within the wing pouch of the wing disc (white box), which becomes the adult
1053 wing. Genotypes for the wing images are: w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-
1054 GAL4;UAS-Cbp20KK109448/+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-dlg1GD4689
1055 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-CG8888GD3777/+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-
1056 GAL4;+; UAS-UQCR-C2GD11238 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-ACCGD3482
1057 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-Klp61FGD14149/+; UAS-Dicer2/+, and
1058 w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-RphGD7330 RNAi/+;UAS-Dicer2/+.
1059
1060 Supplementary Figure 5. Select female and male Drosophila homologs of CNV and
1061 neurodevelopmental genes show altered levels of cell proliferation and apoptosis. (A) Larval
1062 imaginal wing discs (scale bar = 50 µm) stained with nuclear marker DAPI, apoptosis marker
1063 dcp1, and cell proliferation marker pH3 illustrate altered levels of cell proliferation and apoptosis
1064 due to wing-specific knockdown of select fly homologs of CNV genes in females and males. We
1065 examined changes in the number of stained cells within the wing pouch of the wing disc (white
46
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1066 box), which becomes the adult wing. Genotypes for the wing images are: w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+;
1067 UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-lgsGD1241/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+;
1068 UAS-Sra-1GD11477/UAS-Dicer2, and w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;UAS-CG11035KK101201 RNAi+; UAS-
1069 Dicer2/+. (B) Box plot of dcp1-positive cells in larval wing discs with knockdown of select fly
1070 homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes, normalized to controls (n = 9–13, *p < 0.05,
1071 two-tailed Mann–Whitney test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction). The number of dcp1
1072 positive cells were calculated manually. (C) Box plot of pH3-positive cells in the larval wing
1073 discs with knockdown of select fly homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes,
1074 normalized to controls (n = 9–13, *p < 0.05, two-tailed Mann–Whitney test with Benjamini-
1075 Hochberg correction). The number of pH3 positive cells were calculated using the
1076 AnalyzeParticles function in ImageJ. All boxplots indicate median (center line), 25th and 75th
1077 percentiles (bounds of box), and minimum and maximum (whiskers), with red dotted lines
1078 representing the control median.
1079
1080 Supplementary Figure 6. Additional Drosophila homologs of genes within CNV regions
1081 interact with conserved signaling pathways to induce developmental phenotypes. Larval
1082 imaginal wing discs (scale bar = 50 µm) stained with (A) wingless, (B) patched, (C) engrailed,
1083 and (D) delta illustrate disrupted expression patterns for proteins located within the Wnt
1084 (wingless), Hedgehog (patched and engrailed), and Notch (delta) signaling pathways due to
1085 wing-specific knockdown of additional fly homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes.
1086 Dotted yellow boxes represent expected expression patterns for signaling proteins in bxMS1096-
1087 GAL4 control images. White arrowheads and dotted white boxes highlight disruptions in
1088 expression patterns of signaling proteins with knockdown of CNV or neurodevelopmental genes.
47
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1089 Genotypes for the wing images are: w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Dicer2/+, w1118/bxMS1096-
1090 GAL4;+; UAS-dlg1GD4689 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Tsf2GD2442
1091 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-Atx2GD11562 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-
1092 GAL4;+; UAS-UQCR-C2GD11238 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-nudEGD15226
1093 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2, and w1118/bxMS1096-GAL4;+; UAS-ACCGD3482 RNAi/UAS-Dicer2.
1094
1095 Supplementary Figure 7. Tissue-specific network diagrams showing connectivity of human
1096 CNV genes with conserved signaling pathway genes. Representative network diagrams of nine
1097 human CNV and neurodevelopmental genes whose fly homologs disrupt the (A) Wnt and (B)
1098 Hedgehog signaling pathway and 162 human Wnt and 46 human Hedgehog signaling genes
1099 within kidney, heart, and brain-specific gene interaction networks are shown. Yellow nodes
1100 represent CNV and neurodevelopmental genes, pink nodes represent Notch signaling pathway
1101 genes, and green nodes represent connector genes within the shortest paths between CNV and
1102 Notch pathway genes.
1103
1104 Supplementary Data 1 (Excel file). Drosophila homologs of human CNV and
1105 neurodevelopmental genes as determined using DIOPT v.7.1.
1106
1107 Supplementary Data 2 (Excel file). Qualitative and quantitative adult wing phenotypic data for
1108 Drosophila homologs of human CNV and neurodevelopmental genes. This file shows the raw
1109 frequencies of severity for the five qualitative wing phenotypes and average areas and vein
1110 lengths for all 136 female and male tested RNAi lines. In addition, this file also includes k-means
1111 clustering analysis for the female RNAi lines.
48
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1112
1113 Supplementary Data 3 (Excel file). Summary of adult wing qualitative and quantitative
1114 phenotypes by Drosophila homologs. This file summarizes qualitative k-means clustering and
1115 longitudinal L3 vein length and wing area changes for all 136 RNAi lines by fly homologs. We
1116 define discordant homologs when RNAi lines for the same homologs showed inconsistent wing
1117 phenotypes. For each homolog with multiple RNAi lines, we checked discordance among RNAi
1118 lines for no phenotype versus any qualitative or quantitative phenotypes, followed by
1119 discordance for small or large quantitative phenotypes.
1120
1121 Supplementary Data 4 (Excel file). Phenotypes of mouse knockdown models for homologs of
1122 CNV genes. This file lists lethality and neuronal and non-neuronal phenotypes, categorized using
1123 top-level Mammalian Phenotype Ontology terms, for knockdown models of 130 mouse
1124 homologs of CNV genes derived from the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) database.
1125
1126 Supplementary Data 5 (Excel file). Summary of eye-specific and wing-specific phenotypes for
1127 fly homologs. This file summarizes eye-specific and wing-specific phenotypes by severity
1128 category for 66 RNAi lines by fly homologs of CNV and neurodevelopmental genes. Eye
1129 phenotype severity is defined by Flynotyper phenotypic scores with fold-change (FC)
1130 normalization to control as follows: no change (0–1.1 FC), mild (1.1–1.5 FC), moderate (1.5–2.0
1131 FC), and severe (>2.0 FC). Wing phenotype severity is defined by k-means clustering for
1132 qualitative phenotypes and quantitative size changes as listed in Supp. Data 3.
1133
49
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1134 Supplementary Data 6 (Excel file). Tissue-specific expression of Drosophila homologs and
1135 human CNV and neurodevelopmental genes. This file lists expression values across multiple fly
1136 and human tissues for all 79 Drosophila homologs and 150 human genes. Fly expression data
1137 (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million reads, or FPKM) was derived from the FlyAtlas
1138 Anatomical Microarray dataset, and human expression data (transcripts per million reads, or
1139 TPM) was derived from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) dataset v.1.2.
1140
1141 Supplementary Data 7 (Excel file). Summary of immunostaining of the larval imaginal wing
1142 discs. This file summarizes changes in apoptosis (27 homologs), cell proliferation (27
1143 homologs), and Wnt, Hedgehog, and Notch signaling pathway proteins (14 homologs), along
1144 with qualitative and quantitative adult wing phenotypes (as listed in Supp. Data 2.), for female
1145 and male fly homologs.
1146
1147 Supplementary Data 8 (Excel file). Tissue-specific network connectivity for candidate CNV
1148 genes and signaling pathway genes. This file lists the shortest path lengths between nine
1149 candidate CNV genes and 265 genes within Wnt, Hedgehog, and Notch signaling pathways for
1150 heart, kidney, and brain-specific gene interaction networks, along with the connector genes that
1151 are within the shortest paths. Enriched Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process, Cellular
1152 Component, and Molecular Function terms for sets of connector genes for each signaling
1153 pathway in each tissue-specific networks are also represented.
1154
1155 Supplementary Data 9 (Excel file). List of Drosophila stocks used for experiments, including
1156 stock numbers and genotypes.
50
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
1157
1158 Supplementary Data 10 (Excel file). Statistics for all experimental data. This file shows all
1159 statistical information (sample size, mean/median/standard deviation of datasets, test statistics, p-
1160 values, degrees of freedom, confidence intervals, and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR corrections) for
1161 all data. Statistical information for Kruskal-Wallis test includes factors, degrees of freedom, test
1162 statistics, and post-hoc pairwise Wilcoxon tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.
51
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Figure 1
A Experimental strategy B Phenotypic analysis of adult wings in Drosophila × bxMS1096-GAL4 control No phenotype Mild Moderate Severe Wing-specific driver UAS-RNAi bxMS1096-GAL4 (79 genes)
C K-means clustering of qualitative wing data Phenotyping of adult wings Qualitative analysis Quantitative analysis No observable phenotype Mild Moderate Severe Lethal Frequency (n=75) (n=24) (n=10) (n=21) (n=6) • Wrinkled wings • Longitudinal veins 1.0 • Ectopic veins (L2,L3,L4,L5) 0.8 • Missing veins • Crossveins (ACV, PCV) • Discoloration • Wing area 0.6 Bristle planar polarity • 0.4
0.2 Tissue-specific effects Phenotypic severity 0.0 • Compare to ubiquitous knockdown 136 Drosophila RNAi lines • Compare to eye-specific knockdown • Gene expression across multiple tissues (Human and flies) D Summary of qualitative and quantitative adult wing phenotypes
Cellular processes and Qualitative phenotypes Quantitative phenotypes Fly homologs RNAi lines developmental pathways No pheno. Mild Moderate Severe Lethal Wing area L3 vein length • Apoptosis CNV genes • Cell proliferation (15q11.2, 15q13.3, 16p11.2, Distal 16p11.2, 16p12.1, 16p13.11, 17q12, 1q21.1, 3q29, 7q11.23) 95 45 21 7 16 6 65 53 • Disruptions in signaling pathways Known neurodevelopmental genes • Human tissue-specific network analysis (β-catenin, core genes, microcephaly) 41 30 3 3 5 0 24 21 (Brain, heart, kidney) Total 136 7524 10 21 6 89 74 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Figure 2 A Qualitative wing phenotypes of homologs of CNV genes 15q11.2 15q13.3 16p11.2 Distal 16p11.2 16p12.1 16p13.3 17q12 1q21.1 3q29 7q11.23 BP MV DC WR Lethal EV BP MV DC WR Severe EV BP MV DC
Mod. WR EV BP MV DC Mild WR EV BP MV DC WR EV No pheno. GD4689 GD7229 GD3061 GD9561 GD6674 GD9689 GD2249 GD1241 GD6991 GD6343 GD3482 GD9362 GD4372 GD2442 GD9322 GD9260 GD7330 GD6560 GD9986 GD7027 GD15691 GD16961 GD11699 GD564_1 GD11803 GD11383 GD11562 GD564_2 GD15226 GD17096 GD13375 GD14217 GD10067 KK104454 KK105731 KK102281 KK108714 KK100134 KK108281 KK101874 KK101201 KK108049 KK107404 KK107824 KK102573 KK108623 KK100453 KK104813 KK109203 KK102092 KK108812 KK108732 KK104762 KK115768 KK109448 KK107680 KK102370 KK108740 KK101936 KK105756 KK109046 KK108466 KK107736 KK116285 KK107305 KK112485 KK110317 KK109207 KK107577 KK108227 KK109717 KK108387 KK101457 GD8318_1 GD4541_1 GD1138_1 GD2738_1 GD3777_1 GD9586_1 GD1266_1 GD2856_1 GD8318_2 GD2738_2 GD4541_2 GD1266_2 GD2856_2 GD1138_2 GD3777_2 GD9586_2 GD11477_1 GD14152_1 GD11238_1 GD14152_2 GD11477_2 GD11238_2 ke r l lgs Sin ke Lnk Pa1 Aatf lgs Cen Rph dlg1 Tsf2 Pis Fsn Sin ACC Lnk shu Lim1 app Pak app Trpm coro Pa1 Ald1 Atx2 Aatf spin dlg1 Pcyt1 Ald1 Marf1 spict nudE a−1 a−1 Lim1 MRP nudE Doc2 Nsun5 Trpm Trpm Sgf29 Pcyt1 Marf1 Syx1A Syx1A Sgf29 Nsun5 Ada2a Nsun5 PIG−Z Cbp20 LIMK1 LIMK1 PIG−X Sr Sr Fmo−2 CG9150 Fmo−2 Fmo−2 PIG−Wb mEFTu1 CG5589 Pp4−19C mEFTu1 CG2059 CG15528 CG5589 CG8204 CG6836 CG8888 CG8888 Grip128 Grip128 BCL7−li α 5 nAChR CG15309 CG11035 CG17841 CG10465 CG15528 CG14411 CG14182 CG11035 CG14411 CG11035 CG14182 α 5 nAChR α 5 nAChR CLIP−190 BCL7−li UQCR−C2 UQCR−C2 UQCR−C2 B Qualitative wing phenotypes of homologs C Representative qualitative phenotypes of neurodevelopmental genes in the adult wing Frequency β-catenin genes Core genes Microcephaly bxMS1096-GAL4 RphGD7330 BP 1.0 MV DC WR Lethal EV BP 0.8 MV DC
WR Discoloration (DC) Severe EV 0.6 BP KK112485 CG14182GD2738_1 MV CG6836 DC
Mod. WR EV 0.4 BP MV DC Mild WR EV
0.2 Ectopic vein (EV) BP Bristle polarity (BP) MV DC CG15528KK107736 kisKK100890 WR EV
No pheno. 0.0 GD39 GD15 GD2619 GD9974 GD1372 GD6852 GD2905 GD2535 rk GD450_1 GD14481 GD11734 GD10101 GD450_2 GD13500 GD12537 KK108009 KK108534 KK109063 KK101542 KK100878 KK109278 KK100890 KK102545 KK107895 KK101537 KK108197 GD3392_1 GD1375_1 GD6121_1 GD9502_1 GD3392_3 GD3392_2 GD6121_2 GD9502_2 GD1375_2 GD14451_1 GD14383_1 GD14149_1 GD14383_2 GD14451_2 GD14149_2 Eph rk arm kis Eph rk rk Wrinkled (WR) Wrinkled Eph Gat Tpc1 asp asp arm Pten para Pten para para para Nrx−1 Sas−4 Missing vein (MV) org−1 Ube3a Ube3a Sas−4 Prosap MCPH1 Cadps Cadps Scs β G Nrx−1 Nrx−1 Prosap MCPH1 Grip163 Grip163 Klp61F Klp61F Cep135 Cep135 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Figure 3 A Representative quantitative phenotypes in the adult wing Smaller area/L3 vein length Larger area/L3 vein length L5
PCV L4 ACV L3
L2 bxMS1096-GAL4 Fmo-2KK109203 TrpmGD4541_2
B L3 vein lengths for select homologs C Wing area for select homologs epha ly epha ly gen es -catenin -catenin q21 .1 5q13 .3 q21 .1 5q13 .3 q2 9 q11 .23 6p11 .2 q2 9 q11 .23 6p11 .2 6p1 3.11 5q11 .2 5q11 .2 1 3 7 1 1 17q12 β Core Genes Microc 1 3 7 1 1 1 β Core Microc 1 1 17q12 Distal 16p11.2 Distal 16p11.2 2500 20 * * ** * * * * * * *
) 15 * * 2 * * * * * * 2000 * * * * * * * * * µm * 5 * * * * * * * 10 * *
Le ngth ( μ m) *
1500 Area (×10 * 5 * * * *
1000 0 124 1 656 0 124 1 656 0 AL 4 AL 4 1156 2 1138 3 1709 6 1006 7 1375 _1 3777 _1 9586 _1 4541 _2 4541 _2 1375 _1 GD GD GD GD -G 14149 _2 11477 _2 -G 11477 _2 14451 _2 GD GD GD GD KK 1092 03 KK 1094 48 KK 1018 74 KK 1087 32 KK 1057 31 KK 1157 68 KK 1087 14 KK 1014 57 KK 1004 53 KK 1092 78 KK 1015 37 KK 1081 97 KK 1008 90 KK 1092 03 KK 1124 85 KK 1018 74 KK 1087 32 KK 1057 31 KK 1025 73 KK 1157 68 KK 1087 14 KK 1084 66 KK 1092 78 KK 1015 37 KK 1081 97 KK 1008 90 GD GD GD GD GD GD GD GD lgs GD GD lgs rl rl kis kis Fsn 91 50 91 50 Atx2 Pa k asp Ln k Pa k asp Ln k Aa tf Pten Pten 109 6 MS 20 59 bp 20 109 6 MS 68 36 20 59 82 04 org-1 88 MRP Sg f29 org-1 Trpm Trpm un 5 Ns 153 09 178 41 153 09 Fmo-2 p6 1F Fmo-2 C Sra-1 LIMK1 CG Nrx-1 Sra-1 CG Prosap Prosap bx bx CG CG CG CG Kl CG CG CG CG bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Figure 4
A Ubiquitous knockdown B Eye versus wing phenotypes
No wing Wing measurement Mild wing Mod. wing Sev. wing phenotype phenotype phenotype phenotype phenotype Lethal 3 * * * * * * Severe * * * * * Fly RNAi line LarvalPupal lethalityWing lethality Nodefects gross defectsWing phenotypeCNV region sco re (FC) 2 * * * Moderate Sra−1GD11477_2 ns
KK102281 15q11.2 yp ic ns spict Mild Grip128GD14152_1 1 CG14411GD8318_2 GD9986 15q13.3 Trpm phen ot No change Ald1KK107680 KK109207 Pis Eye 0 coroGD14217 GD7330 290 5 261 9 124 1 273 8 733 0 468 9
Rph 1350 0 1696 1 KK102573 GD GD GD GD GD GD
CG17841 GD GD KK107577 KK105756 16p11.2 KK 1048 13 KK 1057 56 KK 1057 31 KK 102573 KK 1157 68 KK 1094 48 KK 1088 12 rl CG10465 lgs Rph KK115768 dlg1 Tpc1 Nrx-1 GMR-GAL4 Lnk Pten
rl spin 141 82
GD9561 bp 20 Sgf29
Pp4−19C 104 65 C KK108623 CR -C2 mEFTu1 Doc2 CG CG17841 KK108714 CG CG15309 UQ Atx2GD11562 Sgf29KK107577 C Severity of eye D Representative eye and wing images LnkKK105731 Distal spinKK104813 16p11.2 versus wing phenotype GMR-GAL4 bxMS1096-GAL4 mEFTu1GD16961 3 lgsGD1241 ns KK109203 1q21.1 Fmo−2 KK115768 CG8888GD3777_1 rl dlg1GD4689 FsnGD11383 2 dlg1GD4689 Control Tsf2GD2442 Cbp20KK109448 3q29 sc ore (FC) CG6836KK112485 PakKK101874
KK109717 Average e ye
PIG−X no typic 1 KK107404 PIG−Z GD3392_1
para KK105731 Ubiquitous Wing ph e Lnk Ubiquitous (da-GAL4) Wing-specific MS1096 0 Full penetrance (bx -GAL4)
Partial penetance Lethal Mild
No phenotype Le thal GD16961 Severe Se vere ode rate
Moderate he notype M Mild phenotype
Wing size changes Measurement No p
No phenotype mEFTu1 Wing phenotypic severity Figure 5 Larval Adult CNV regions bioRxiv preprint not certifiedbypeerreview)istheauthor/funder,whohasgrantedbioRxivalicensetodisplaypreprintinperpetuity.Itmadeavailable Drosophila Drosophila (FlyAtlas) (FlyAtlas) Muscle Kidney Heart Brain Lung Liver Wing phenotype B A doi:
CYFIP1 15q11.2 https://doi.org/10.1101/855338 Fat body Fat body Expression patternsofflyhomologs ofCNVgenesacrossmultipleflytissues
NIPA2 Trachea CHRNA7
15q13.3 Heart Brain
X X TRPM1 CNS Gut Gut
X ALD O A
X CORO1A DOC2A FAM57B Expression patternsofCNVgenesacrossmultiplehumantissues KCTD13 16p11.2 MRP MAPK3 Cen
X X PPP4C spin
QPRT under a
asp ; this versionpostedDecember6,2019. X YPEL3 Cadps ATP2A1 Sgf29 ATXN2L CC-BY 4.0Internationallicense SH2B1 Distal 16p11.2 CG9150 SPNS1 Fsn TUFM CG10465 CCDC101 Lim1 CDR2 Nrx−1 16p12.1 PIG−X
X X POLR3E Pten
X X X X UQCRC2 ABCC6 para MYH11 16p13.11 Lnk DHRS11 Trpm AATF Ube3a DDX52 17q12 Fmo−2 . LHX1 CG2059 The copyrightholderforthispreprint(whichwas
X X ACACA lgs HNF1B CG8888 BCL9 1q21.1 CLIP−190 X X X FMO5 CG11035
X GJA5 BDH1 CG17841 DLG1 LIMK1 FBXO45 rl MFI2 org−1 NCBP2 3q29 CG15309 PAK2 BCL7−like Sra−1 X PIGX kis
X TFRC ABHD11 Rph BCL7B Pak CLIP2 Aatf DNAJC30 7q11.23 X Atx2 ELN nAChRα5
X LIMK1 arm
X X STX1A CG5589 CLDN3 Klp61F GTF2IRD1 Tsf2 CTNNB1 β-catenin Cbp20 NRXN1 Pp4−19C
X PTEN TBX1 mEFTu1 CADPS2 UQCR−C2 Core genes ACC
X CHD8 Sin
X SCN1A UBE3A dlg1
ASPM Microcephaly Expression Wing phenotype KIF11 Mild No phenotype No expression Low Moderate High Very high Wing sizechanges Moderate Severe Lethal Expression No expression Low Moderate High Very high Figure 6 A SinGD7027 Atx2GD11562 Pp4-19CGD9561 AatfGD7229 bxMS1096-GAL4 DAPI Cellular processesinlarvalwingdiscs bioRxiv preprint not certifiedbypeerreview)istheauthor/funder,whohasgrantedbioRxivalicensetodisplaypreprintinperpetuity.Itmadeavailable doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338 dcp1 ppoi Cellproliferation Apoptosis Increased Increased Increased Increased pH3 under a ; this versionpostedDecember6,2019. CC-BY 4.0Internationallicense Decreased Decreased Decreased Decreased
Normalized pH3 Normalized dcp1 C B positive cells positive cells 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 . The copyrightholderforthispreprint(whichwas MS1096 bx -GAL4 (GD) bxMS1096-GAL4 (GD) MS1096 bx -GAL4 (KK) MS1096 * bx -GAL4 (KK) armKK102545 * KK109448 KK115768 * Cbp20 rl GD11562 * Atx2 KK105756 ns GD9561 * CG10465
Pp4-19C ns *
Quantification ofproliferatingcells GD3482 GD1241 ACC
lgs Quantification ofapoptoticcells * GD7229 GD11383 ns Aatf Fsn KK108197 * org-1 GD4689 ns LnkKK105731 * dlg1 * GD7330 KK101201 * Rph CG11035 KK107577 * Sgf29 KK107577 *
* Sgf29 Sra-1GD11477_2 *
* GD1241 rkKK108009 lgs * Klp61FGD14149_2 KK108009 * GD7027 * rk
Sin GD11477_2 * rl KK115768 * Sra-1 * CG11035KK101201 KK100890 *
ns kis KK109203 Fmo-2 GD11238_1 * ns UQCR-C2 UQCR-C2GD11238_1 ns KK108197 * CG15309 KK108714 org-1 KK102573 ns CG17841 KK108714 * sns ns CG15309 CG10465 KK105756 *
ns KK102573 ACCGD3482 CG17841
GD15226 KK109203 * nudE Fmo-2 KK100890 ns
kis KK105731 * ns Lnk FsnGD11383 * * GD3777_1 CG8888GD3777_1 CG8888 dlg1GD4689 * bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Figure 7 Disruption of signaling pathways in larval wing discs bxMS1096-GAL4 Pp4-19CGD9561 Cbp20KK109448 SinGD7027 AatfGD7229 Klp61FGD14149_2 A Wnt wingless
B patched
C Hedgehog engrailed
D delta Notch bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Figure 8 A Human CNV genes interact with Notch signaling pathway genes in multiple tissues Kidney Heart Brain
CTNNB1
DTX4
TCF3
CTNNA1 NDE1
GSK3B
SOCS5 ARF1
RBM39 MTA1
PHLDA1
MAML2
NR3C1
ATXN1L PAFAH1B1
IRF9
NUMBL
TIMP3
FOXO1
NDRG1 NCK1 ABL1
WBP11 PML NUMBL
SMAD3 KAT2A OS9 NOTCH2NL
CD44 DTX3L
HNRNPU
BZW1 CREB1
PSME3
TNS1
HES1 VIM
PSEN1
CANX TRIP6
ATXN1L
NRIP1
COL4A2 KAT2B
SIRT1
INPP5D
CIR1 PLSCR1
TMX1 MCL1
COPS5
TRIM27
TAB2 PTEN LYN
CDKN1B PDCD4
UBN1 HMGN4
TRIP10
PRR11
APP
EZR UBE2K MR1
HEY1 DVL1 FEZ1 SLK
TGIF1
STAT2
DLL4
HSPA4
DLL1 PSMC2
ATP2B4
NCOA3
KARS
RANBP2
CSNK1E PSMA1
RELA HLTF
CTDSP2 CREBBP
FMR1 EP300
NAB1 PPP2CA
PSMC6
CASK TM4SF1 HSP90AA1
LUC7L3
SMAD4
SMARCC1 CDC27
PRKD2
H2AFX
CEP170 PSMA1
CAMSAP2 FYN TLE2 KCTD12
CTCF LAPTM4B AZIN1
NARS NRIP1 UBR2 DAG1
PUF60
KAT6A UBE2D3 BUB3
NOTCH3
ATP2B4
TMED10
GFPT1 MORC3
NCOA3 VIM
LEPROTL1
SLC39A6
BHLHE40
FLNA NFKBIA NCOR1 RB1 NPR1 MAML2 NUMB CTBP1 ZNF146 PTDSS1 GRN PSEN2
MYO1B DDX1 DNAJB6
YY1
CSE1L COPS3
PTP4A2
BRCA1 TP53
QKI RBM10 SFSWAP PSENEN C1D
RAN
MKI67
DLL1 UTP6 P4HB PPP1R2
E2F1 DNAJA1 SRSF2
FNDC3B RAD54B LSM14A
BAZ2B HEYL SOCS5 CIR1 DPYSL2 CDK1 RANBP1
TNPO1 RBPJ
NOTCH2 NCSTN
DEK CTBP2 XPO1
PRPF3 CENPA PAXIP1
KAT2B ATXN1 MAML1 NOTCH1 SYNCRIP SRSF10
CCT5
DVL3 NCK1 NCOR2 DAZAP2 MFNG
CTBP2 SSRP1 SIRT1 PSMD14
CCT6A NAB1 SNW1
CIB1
JAG1
PA2G4
NOTCH2
APH1B DDX23 UBE2D2 ABCE1 FLNA SSR1 TRIOBP PUM2 CBX3
PAPOLA SSBP2 AKAP13 ATXN1 SET
GFPT1 PSMD14
DTX2 HDAC1
TUBB4B DVL2
RAB32 RBPMS
USP1 RASA1 PIK3CA ZC3H11A
PPP4R1
HFE RBBP8
SNW1
TLE4 CSNK1D
HES1 RHOXF2 RNF11
SIRT1 COPS2 KHSRP DKC1 PPP6C
BHLHE40
KIAA0355
NCBP2 NUP153 OAT ATF2 TPM4
NUP98 ABI1 IER2 RAB21 DDX39A NUP98 DTX2 AKT3 UBR5
PRPF4 DHX15
KHDRBS1 COPS3
NOTCH3
SNRPG QKI BCL6 HDAC2
FLAD1 ATP2B4
NARS ADAM10 TCF7L2
TLE1 HSPA4 NUMB HACD2 TLE4
ADAM17
RHOXF2 CDC20 PFN1 TGFB2 P4HA1 PARP1 DHX15 ITGB4
NOTCH1 MAD2L1 ARHGAP5
LAMP1 SRSF1 CCT5 DLG1 ILF3 SNRPD3
XRCC5 POLE2 ATP6V0B USP15 UBE2G1 NCK1
MTF2 KMT2A
PRPF40A MCM7 YES1 ARL1 COIL
RBPJ
PAXIP1 IL6ST
TLE4 UBR5
SNRPD1 EGFR SLC19A1
SAP30 SYT7
MAML2 TAGLN2 CYBRD1
CCT5 HDAC2
KDM2A ABL1 USP1
MAPRE1 SRSF3 HEY1
DAZAP2
XRCC6
PIK3R1 KDM5B
SERBP1 PPP1CA ADAM17 CDKN1A SMARCA4 EIF3A
RBPJ PRKDC PAPOLA CDC25A STK24 CTBP2
MAML1 RBPMS VEGFA EP300
IL6ST
MYC TLE1 HNRNPUL1 COIL DDR1 RAC1 MRPL3 PTBP1
LAMP1 TLE3 PSMD13 SMARCC1 CBFB CAVIN1
GSK3B DLG1 PJA2 NOTCH2 PTBP1
CCNA2 POLR3E
APH1A CDKN1A DEK
RB1CC1
CTNNA1 CLIC1 PPP4R1
JAG2 AATF NDE1 RSBN1
PAICS TOPBP1
CREBBP CALD1 WDR77
PUM2 SRSF2 BCAP31 EWSR1
GNA11 SNW1
EWSR1
LEPROTL1 TACC1 PTPN11 TUBG1 SMARCA5 NUDC
TLE2
NRP1
CKAP5
CREBBP PPP2R5C XRCC5 EP300
MRPL3 MAD2L1 SNRPG HDAC1 NRP2 TRIO GNB2 MAML1 NCBP2 NCOA3 SCARB2
AZIN1
RELA FYN ACTN1 JAG2 AATF PTBP1
HSPE1
SEC24A DKC1 DHX15
PDCD11 ACTL6A CTNNA1 HMOX2 YY1 TOPBP1 ATXN1
DDX1 TK1 CDC20 DNAJB6 USP1 XRCC6 NCBP2
DDR1 VARS UBR5
NUMB KIF11 ID4
JAG1 DLL1 UBE2N CCNB1
CIR1 CTBP1 RANBP9
TMED10 HDAC2
DNAJB6 CUL4B PRKDC RNPS1
ATP6V0D1
SERINC3 CSE1L TMEM109
UPF1
PA2G4 GMEB2
MCM5 TP53
JAG1 HSPA13 IL6ST GNA11
APLP2
PARP1 CCT7 SRSF2 CTBP1 TRIM2
ADAM17 CENPA PSEN1 SSRP1 DLG1
NCBP1 SEPT10 TPD52L2
BUB3 UBE2D4 TRIP13 CCT3 RELA ERBB2
ZMYM4 NOTCH1 DTX1 TRIP13 CCT3
SMAD4 PA2G4 SRP19 PDGFRA EIF3B STK24 ILF3
KAT2B BCS1L CCT7
ATIC TRA2B FLNA YWHAZ TPP1 PRPF3
GTSE1
YWHAZ
RUNX1 STAT3
MTF2 RAC1
HRAS HEY1 NUP62 MTDH PNN
EIF3A CCT3
KHDRBS1 PPP4C HEYL HSPA13 AGPAT2 RANBP9 CCT2 SUGP2 SYNCRIP GNB1 TTC3
TMEM97
TOPBP1
GMPS DKC1 NCSTN MAPRE1 ATP1B1
MORC3 PSME3 NCOR1
NUP85 POLR3E CDKN2C NCOR2 AZIN1 KDM5B
PPP1CA EIF2S1 DLL4 TIMP3
ATIC
EIF4G1
CREB1
UBE2D3
HDAC1 KDELR3
KDELR1 USP34
TPP1 DEK POLR3E HSP90AA1 KLC1 ATXN1L MAD2L1 TLE1
DAZAP2
SMARCA4 XRCC6 RFC3 KIF11 AIMP2
SELENOT
PRIM1
DIMT1 HNRNPA3 UBE2M GNB2 NDE1
CDK4 TROAP PARP1 EIF3B UBE2N HGS
CCNB1
UBE2D2 RNASEH2A C15orf39 DVL2 RNF11
GFPT1
CCNF
DLL3
PPP4C TRIM2 RFNG
TRIP13 CASK CDKN2C VARS CEP126 MSH6
CCT6A NUMBL PAICS
PSENEN
CANX
ACOT7 HRAS
SMARCA4 FUBP1 TMED10 SAP30
UBE2K DTX3 DVL3 HES1 CDK4 SRSF1 DDR1 RAD21 ILF3 SART3 TOMM40
CSE1L KAT2A
UBQLN1
APH1B
PKP4
TLE3 HRAS
BRCA1 RBBP7
AATF RNF126 DTX4
WDR77 PRPF3 UBQLN1 CCT7
ADRM1 HEY2
KAT2A CD151
BRCA1 RB1 PSEN2
UBE2D3 RNF138 NOTCH3 CTDSP2
CSNK1E HAP1
FNDC3B
ARFGAP1
HNRNPUL1
RNPS1 SSRP1 CSNK1D
POLE2
ADAM10
AGPAT2
GNB2 PPP4C RIN1 MBNL2 ILF2 TRIM27 UBE2D2
RUVBL2 NSD2 ILF2 CDC20 UPF3A TRIP6
VARS ANK3
CASP2 FKBP4 TCF3 PSEN2 BRD4
ESR1
PTPRK
GNA11 TMPO RAC1 RB1 BAG6 SFRP1 DVL1 KIF11 TLE3
DVL3 APH1B APH1A
DMWD CDK13 PPP2R1A SMAD3 HGS
UBE2H SPEN
PPP1CC CIB1
RANBP9 HSPA4 ARHGDIA
JAG2 MTUS1
NCOR2 TMBIM6 CSNK1G2 TAL1 PSEN1 PPP1CA SNRPA
TOP2A
DMWD MCM7 CXXC1
BOP1 NCSTN TRA2B UBE2K
TUBG1 BRF1 NONO RNPS1 GNB1 UBE2D4 RNF11 MCM5 NUDC
RFNG YWHAG
CUL4B JPT1 ALCAM APH1A
UBE2M
PBK
UBE2D4 CCNA2
HSPG2 UBE2M PLK1
CIB1
NPTXR
DTX3L
STRN4 RBPMS
ERBB4
CDK1 PSMB3
MTA1
EPHB4 DTX3
DTX1 TLE2
ATP6V0B
ADGRL1 SRP19 CTSC PSMB3
LTBP2
PTCRA BOP1
PPP2R1A TPX2 TOMM20
CCNA2
EWSR1 GRK2 PPP4R1
PSENEN MTA1 AKT2
UBE2H
PTCRA E2F4 ZDHHC17
RECQL5 ATP6V0C LAMP1 MCM4
HGS MFI2 SYNCRIP CASP8
JAK3 ATIC DRD2
TRIM27
USP19 E2F1
CCNF RARB ARL4D PLSCR1
RNF126
ARPC1A
DTX3L
MYCBP
ATP6V0C NFIB
TAOK2 GSK3B
RAC2 GTSE1 FEN1
MYO9B PHB
SNTA1
TP53
ARHGDIA RAD50
DTX3 ASXL1
MLF2
ATP6V0D1 MKI67
DTX4 CSNK1E
OTUB1
NOTCH4
VBP1
RCN2 TMBIM6 E2F1
EMP3
PAX8
CYP2A6
FTH1 ATN1
NCKIPSD
RFNG CASP10 DTX1
PLK1 TOMM40 DVL2 PSME2
RUNX2
EPS8L1
DDX11
BTRC CDC25B UBC
DVL1
FGF18
CDKN3 RAD54B BAG6
ARHGEF1
FZR1
MCRS1
NTRK3
GSTM5 FKBP8
MFNG FOXK1
DGKZ
GRK6 VAMP2
RHOXF2 DTX2
RBPJL
COL11A2 LYN
RAC2
HGH1
GET4
DNAJC4 LFNG
MAML3
HEYL
GSK3A
MFNG
PAPPA2
ESR2
CCDC9
BCAN
INPP5D
LFNG CNV/neurodevelopmental gene Signaling pathway gene Connector gene B Average connectivity of CNV genes to C GO term enrichment for connector genes in signaling pathways genes in tissue-specific networks
Hedgehog Notch Wnt en t ns 0.6 0.6 0.6 bo lism ns ub iquitination
* pa ir ne acetylation on se to stimulus Signaling on se to stress lle organizationane lle
* an developm * pathway Tissue Org Protein folding Protein Proteolysis Histo Org Signal trans du ction Dopaminergic signaling Axon-dendrite transport Cell cycle re DNA Chromatin organization Protein localization Protein meta Regulation of transcription 0.4 * 0.4 0.4 Resp Resp processing/splicingRNA Brain Hedgehog Heart path length path length path length Kidney
Brain 0.2 0.2 0.2 Notch Heart Kidney 1/shortest 1/shortest 1/shortest Brain Wnt Heart 0.0 0.0 0.0 Kidney KidneyHeart Brain KidneyHeart Brain KidneyHeart Brain Ubiquitous GO enrichments Neuronal GO Non-neuronal enrichments GO enrichments bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Figure 9
CNV region
( Gene A Gene B Gene C Gene D Gene E Gene F )
Developmental pathways Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog
Biological processes Signal transduction Cell cycle RNA processing Axonal transport Apoptosis Protein degradation
Neuronal phenotypes Non-neuronal phenotypes Autism Cardiac defects Epilepsy Kidney defects Intellectual disability Craniofacial features Micro/macrocephaly Musculoskeletal defects bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Supp. Figure 1 A L2 vein length in adult wing B L4 vein length in adult wing C L5 vein length in adult wing 11 .2 11 .2 11 .2 epha ly epha ly epha ly 16 p 16 p 16 p -catenin -catenin -catenin 5q13 .3 q21 .1 q21 .1 5q13 .3 q21 .1 5q13 .3 6p11 .2 q2 9 q11 .23 q2 9 q11 .23 6p11 .2 6p11 .2 q2 9 q11 .23 5q11 .2 5q11 .2 5q11 .2 1 1 β 1 3 7 Distal 17q12 Core Genes Microc 1 3 7 1 Distal 1 17q12 β Core Genes Microc 1 17q12 Core Genes Microc 1 3 7 1 β 1 1 1 Distal 2000 2000 1500 * * * * ns * * * * * * * ns * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1500 * * * * 1500 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1000 * * * * * * * 1000 1000 * Le ngth ( μm) Le ngth ( μm) Le ngth ( μm)
500 500 500
0 0 0 AL 4 AL 4 AL 4 124 1 656 0 124 1 124 1 656 0 656 0 1138 3 1709 6 1006 7 1138 3 1138 3 1709 6 1709 6 -G 1006 7 1006 7 -G -G 1375 _1 4541 _2 1375 _1 1375 _1 4541 _2 4541 _2 GD GD GD GD GD GD 14451 _2 11477 _2 11477 _2 14451 _2 14451 _2 11477 _2 GD GD GD GD GD GD GD GD GD KK 1087 14 KK 1057 31 KK 1018 74 KK 1025 73 KK 1092 03 KK 1087 32 KK 1157 68 KK 1092 78 KK 1008 90 KK 1084 66 KK 1124 85 KK 1015 37 KK 1081 97 KK 1087 14 KK 1057 31 KK 1087 14 KK 1018 74 KK 1025 73 KK 1092 03 KK 1057 31 KK 1025 73 KK 1018 74 KK 1092 03 KK 1087 32 KK 1157 68 KK 1157 68 KK 1092 78 KK 1087 32 KK 1008 90 KK 1092 78 KK 1008 90 KK 1084 66 KK 1084 66 KK 1124 85 KK 1124 85 KK 1015 37 KK 1015 37 KK 1081 97 KK 1081 97 GD GD GD GD GD GD lgs lgs lgs rl rl rl GD GD GD GD GD GD Fsn 91 50 Fsn Fsn 91 50 91 50 kis kis kis asp Ln k asp asp Ln k Ln k Pa k 109 6 MS Pa k Pa k 109 6 MS 109 6 MS Pten Pten Pten 20 59 Sg f29 org-1 82 04 68 36 20 59 20 59 Sg f29 Sg f29 82 04 org-1 org-1 82 04 68 36 68 36 Trpm Trpm un 5 Ns Trpm un 5 Ns un 5 Ns 178 41 178 41 178 41 CG 153 09 CG CG 153 09 153 09 Fmo-2 Fmo-2 Fmo-2 bx Nrx-1 Sra-1 bx bx Nrx-1 Nrx-1 Sra-1 Sra-1 Prosap Prosap Pros ap CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG D ACV length in adult wing E PCV length in adult wing 11 .2 11 .2 epha ly epha ly 16 p 16 p -catenin -catenin q21 .1 5q13 .3 q21 .1 5q13 .3 6p11 .2 q2 9 q11 .23 6p11 .2 q2 9 q11 .23 5q11 .2 5q11 .2 1 1 1 17q12 β Core Genes Microc 1 3 7 1 1 17q12 β Core Genes Microc 3 7 1 1 Distal Distal 250 100 * * ns ns 200 ns * 80 ns * ns * * ns ns * * * * ns ns * * * * * * ns * * ns * * * * * * * * 60 * * 150 * * * *
100 Le ngth ( μm) 40 Le ngth ( μm)
20 50 Missing ACV 0 0 _1 AL 4 AL 4 124 1 656 0 124 1 656 0 1138 3 1709 6 1138 3 1006 7 1709 6 1006 7 -G -G 1375 4541 _2 1375 _1 4541 _2 GD GD GD GD 14451 _2 11477 _2 14451 _2 11477 _2 D GD GD GD GD GD GD KK 1087 14 KK 1057 31 KK 1025 73 KK 1018 74 KK 1092 03 KK 1157 68 KK 1087 32 KK 1092 78 KK 1008 90 KK 1084 66 KK 1124 85 KK 1087 14 KK 1057 31 KK 1025 73 KK 1015 37 KK 1081 97 KK 1018 74 KK 1092 03 KK 1157 68 KK 1087 32 KK 1092 78 KK 1008 90 KK 1084 66 KK 1124 85 KK 1015 37 KK 1081 97 G GD GD GD lgs lgs rl rl GD GD GD GD Fsn Fsn 91 50 91 50 kis kis asp asp Ln k Ln k Pa k Pa k 109 6 MS 109 6 MS Pten Pten 20 59 Sg f29 org-1 82 04 68 36 20 59 Sg f29 org-1 82 04 68 36 Trpm Trpm un 5 Ns un 5 Ns 178 41 178 41 CG CG 153 09 153 09 Fmo-2 Fmo-2 bx bx Nrx-1 Sra-1 Nrx-1 Sra-1 Prosap Prosap CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG CG Eye phenotypic score (FC) 0 1 2 3 B A Supp. Figure2 bioRxiv preprint not certifiedbypeerreview)istheauthor/funder,whohasgrantedbioRxivalicensetodisplaypreprintinperpetuity.Itmadeavailable
GMR-GAL4
ns Eye phenotypic score (FC) CG15309KK108714 0 1 2 3 Mild phenotype rkKK108009 *
GD3777_1 *
CG8888 GMR-GAL4 doi: ns No phenotype KK109203 * Fmo-2 CenGD9689 https://doi.org/10.1101/855338
GD14152_1 * Grip128 rkGD14383_2 * KK102573 *
CG17841 * Tpc1GD2905 KK110317 *
Pa1 GD3392_2 *
* para Sra-1GD11477_2 GD4541_1 * * Trpm rlKK115768 *
* GD1266_2 lgsGD1241 Fmo-2 Grip128GD14152_2 *
spinKK104813 *
Eye phenotypic score (FC) under a ; 0 1 2 3 this versionpostedDecember6,2019. Moderate CC-BY 4.0Internationallicense GMR-GAL4 Eye phenotypic score (FC) KK101874 *
Pak 0 1 2 3
GD14383_1 * rk GMR-GAL4 phenotype ns No observable phenotype GD11477_1 * CG6836KK112485
Sra-1 Observable phenotype ns PisKK109207 * CG14182 GD2738_1 ns FsnGD11383 * * KK109717 RphGD7330 PIG-X * coroGD14217 . The copyrightholderforthispreprint(whichwas CG14182GD2738_2 *
GD3392_1 * Eye phenotypic score (FC) para * 0 1 2 3 Ube3aGD450_1 * EphGD39 Wing measurement phenotype GMR-GAL4 * Severe GD9986 GD10101 ns Trpm Prosap GD10067 * GD11238_1 ns Sgf29
UQCR-C2 * paraKK108534 GD16961 *
mEFTu1 * phenotype Pa1GD6674 KK107305 *
mEFTu1 * Sgf29KK107577 KK109448 * Cbp20 * Doc2KK108623 *
KK101936 * Sin PtenKK109278 *
KK102545 * arm Fmo-2GD1266_1 *
GD9561 * Pp4-19C PIG-Z KK107404 * GD11562 * Atx2 LnkGD9362
TrpmGD4541_2 * * Ald1GD11803
KK108227 * Eye phenotypic score (FC) app GD2619 * 0 1 2 3 Nrx-1 spictKK102281 * Lethal phenotype GMR-GAL4 ProsapKK101537 *
CadpsGD9502_1 * ns
UQCR-C2 KK108812 KK105756 * CG10465
KK105731 * * Lnk UQCR-C2GD11238_2 CadpsGD9502_2 * * * GD13500 SinGD7027 Pten
dlg1GD4689 * bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Supp. Figure 3
A Larval Drosophila expression B Adult Drosophila expression
Gut Trachea Gut Heart
1 1 1 1
2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 2
58 59 0 0 0 1 CNS 1 2 Fat Body Brain 0 1 Fat Body 1 2 bioRxiv preprint not certifiedbypeerreview)istheauthor/funder,whohasgrantedbioRxivalicensetodisplaypreprintinperpetuity.Itmadeavailable Supp. Figure4 CG8888GD3777 dlg1GD4689 Cbp20KK109448 beadexMS1096-GAL4 DAPI doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338 dcp1 under a ; this versionpostedDecember6,2019. Increased Increased Increased CC-BY 4.0Internationallicense Cellular processesinlarvalwingdiscs pH3 Decreased Increased Increased . The copyrightholderforthispreprint(whichwas
RphGD7330 Klp61FGD14149_2 ACCGD3482 UQCR-C2GD11238_1 No change Increased Increased Increased No change No change Decreased Decreased CG11035KK101201 Sra-1GD11477_2 lgsGD1241 bxMS1096-GAL4 DAPI A Supp. Figure5 bioRxiv preprint not certifiedbypeerreview)istheauthor/funder,whohasgrantedbioRxivalicensetodisplaypreprintinperpetuity.Itmadeavailable Cellular processesinfemaleandmalelarvalwingdiscs dcp1 doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338 Female Increased Increased Increased pH3 Decreased Decreased Decreased under a ; this versionpostedDecember6,2019. CC-BY 4.0Internationallicense . The copyrightholderforthispreprint(whichwas Male Increased Increased Increased No change No change No change B C
Normalized pH3 positive cells Cell proliferationinlarvalwingdiscs Normalized pH3 positive cells 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0 1 2 3 4 Apoptosis inlarvalwingdiscs
MS1096 bx MS1096-GAL4 (GD) bx -GAL4 (GD)
MS1096 bx MS1096-GAL4 (KK) Female
bx -GAL4 (KK) Female *
* GD1241 lgsGD1241 lgs
GD11477_2 * Sra-1GD11477_2 * Sra-1
KK101201 * CG11035 KK101201 * CG11035
MS1096 bx MS1096-GAL4 (GD) bx -GAL4 (GD) MS1096 bx MS1096-GAL4 (KK) bx -GAL4 (KK) Male Male *
ns GD1241 GD1241 lgs lgs *
ns GD11477_2 GD11477_2 Sra-1 Sra-1 * ns CG11035 KK101201 CG11035 KK101201 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Supp. Figure 6 Disruption of signaling pathways in larval wing discs
bxMS1096-GAL4 dlg1GD4689 Tsf2GD2442 Atx2GD11562 UQCR-C2GD11238_1 nudEGD15226 ACCGD3482 A Wnt wingless
B patched
C Hedgehog engrailed
D delta Notch bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/855338; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
Supp. Figure 7 A Human CNV genes interact with Wnt signaling pathway genes in multiple tissues Kidney Heart Brain
SFRP4
CTNNBIP1 WNT10A
FZD8
TCF7
RNF43
WNT5B NFATC2
CEP126
BRF1
CHD3
CAPNS1
JUP
FXYD5
CALM3
NCOA2
ARVCF
SFRP5
AFF2
WIF1
NFATC2
E2F4 CER1 FGFR3
NFATC1
PRICKLE1
ADGRL1
TRIM28 TCF7
TNK2
POLR1B ZNF160
AGRN
VIM
INVS RRBP1 NKD2
DBN1
DHX9
IQGAP1
RUNX1T1 AKAP8L DLX4
ARHGAP5 LAMA4 CTNNBIP1
CYLD
PPP2R1A
PTCRA
APPBP2 GNB2
SGSM2
PDCD5 FGFR1 DVL1
GTF3C1
SS18
TSPAN4
ARHGAP1
MTA1
TBK1
LRP5 SHANK2
PAX8 ZNF207
GTF2H1
DVL1 MINK1
TUBB4B RAD23A GPC5 CAMK2A BCS1L
CYP2A6 PSMA1
FEZ1
GAPDH EPS8
CHD8
CHD4 XPOT
CSNK1D ARHGDIA PRRC2A RAC2
PLAUR AP2S1 RAC2 CCNA2 DLG3
CER1
SFRP2 GLP1R
GTSE1
EIF4G1 SQSTM1 EMP3
MAP1LC3B PAXIP1
PLOD3 7-Mar
PRPF3
PLOD3 TUBB2A SNRPF
CAMK2D
SAC3D1 CDC25A E2F1
TAF9B FEN1 TGFA LEF1 OGG1
GNAI3 DNAJC4 PLCB2 NCBP1 DMWD DAG1 FUT6
CTCF SOX17 WBP11
KLHDC3 DVL3 MSH2 MUC3A
FMR1
ACACA NIFK TCF3 PLCB3
CAMK2B PRPF8 PRKDC CTSC PPP3R1 CCNF
BRCA1
PLOD3 RNASEH2A
FZD2 JUP
COL6A2 MCRS1 ARHGDIB PRKACA
MAPK10 BRD2 NPC2 BCCIP CNBP PLEKHA3 SF3B4 WDR5
CHD8 VARS
PIK3R1 AGPAT2 REL PDIA4
PAFAH1B1 PPIF
STAT3
FEN1 TAL1 GTF3C1 SUPT16H TK1 BAD WNT3
SMARCD1
CSNK2A2
NCK1 B4GALT2
MAPK8
VANGL1
NFATC4 ICMT
TMPO SNRPD3 HNRNPUL1
TOMM20 NONO RHOA WNT8B EIF3H
PPP4R1 EIF3H MBD4
NPM1 BAMBI ACP1 WNT16
TIA1 ARHGDIA FZD8 PABPN1
UBAP2L GSE1 FLII
BAMBI DMWD GNB2
CSNK1E VIM TFDP1 TLE2 SNRPA ARF5 YES1 FOSL1 AMD1
MKI67 DVL2
DVL2 NTRK3
RAD54B GNA11
PPP2R5D CSNK2A3 ESR1 MAPRE1 CHEK1 RNPS1 SSR1 COPS6 HNRNPAB EGFR RELA
PRKCA KARS
MMP7 RAC2 DAD1
CSNK1E SSRP1 MTERF3 ODC1
MOB4 RAC1 SUGP2 PRMT5
CALM1 VARS CASP8 PPIG
SFPQ
PIK3CA
EXOSC8 VEZF1 PSMD14 CSNK2A3
H2AFX CTCF CPSF1 RPA1 CBY1 ZNRF3 DVL3 PPP1CA MCM10 VARS DKK4 UBE2M PRKACG NOTUM GSK3A VANGL1 LRRFIP1
DDX18 SCARB1 GAS6
YY1 PRKCB
RANBP9 CYP2A6 ALDOB CAMK2D
PTBP1 CSNK2B SMARCA4 EMP3 NUP85 CALM1 GMFB
AIMP2 CSNK1D FZR1
CBFB SRSF10 NFATC1 CBY1
ATP6V0B E2F4 MKRN1 PRDX1 PA2G4 RHOA CSNK2A2 CTNND1
OGT
DTL
MCM5 SFPQ DNAJB6
TPX2 CSNK2B TLE3 SRSF3 EIF3M ILF3 NOL11 H2AFX
PA2G4 SERPINF1 TMPO SERBP1 ZNF148 SET PLSCR4
FZD2 RUVBL2 AURKA SMARCC1 PRKDC FOSL1 SUPT16H FZD4 MRPL12 WNT2B LGR4 ESR1 PPP4C SART3
SMAD2 COL4A3BP
PRICKLE4 TRA2B EP300 ZMYND11 PPARD CRK MCM4
BOP1
ITGB3BP MCM7
USP1 PRPF4 BUB3 CDC20 FZD5 IPO7
DAG1 SNX1 FZD9 ATIC USP1 PLSCR1 HDAC2
GNA11
FZD4 TOP1 MYCBP TMX1
EIF2S1 FZD5 WNT6 RUVBL1 CCT6A
UBC MCM7 RUVBL2
BTRC DVL2 ENSA
MCM5 RRS1 PRICKLE3 IKBKG CD44 HDAC1
NFATC4 FLAD1 SYNCRIP ABCE1 CHUK CSNK2A1 GNL3
CSNK2A2
GNA11 COL4A3BP BAMBI LRP6 AASDHPPT
ICMT PPP3R1 GTF3C2 ATP5C1 NFATC3 CCNA2 RUNX1 CAMK2A GLO1
PRPF3
ACTR1A DNAJB6 RAC1 KPNA2 MCM10 RHOXF2 CSE1L RBBP8 COL4A2 CHD8 PKP4 MCAM CTBP1 OCIAD2 GPC4
BRCA1 RNPS1 HSPA4 CCNA2 PSME3 RAC1 UBC AATF
MRPL42 MAPK9
MCM5 COL4A1 WDR77 CDK1 CCND3 PPARD PRIM1 NUP153 ACTN1 CAMK2G WDR77 SMARCA4 SYT7 VBP1 DKC1 RUNX2
SMAD2
CCT2
ARIH1 FZD6
MSH2 PPP2R1A
MYC TP53 OCIAD2 CDKN1A HGH1 PPP6C UBA2 PSMD14
CCNF
WNT1
YTHDF3 RBM10 HNRNPA3 SMC4 HMGA2 NCOR2 PSMB3 CDK4 TLE2 HSPA8 SMARCA4 EIF3H PARP1 UBE2N CCND3 ZNF148 JAG2 CSNK2B RYK MAPRE1 PFKP CREBBP EFEMP2 XRCC5 CSNK1G2
PAPOLA ARHGEF40 JPT1 YWHAZ SSRP1 EWSR1
ATP5C1 PLCB1 CCT5 PTTG1IP CACYBP HDAC2 DDX23 UBE2D3 MYC MRPL3
MSH2 COL4A2 DUT PPP3CC NCOR1
KLC1 SNRPD1 SERPINH1 ACTL6A
PRPF40A PRPF3 CSNK2A1 SNX1 PPP3CA PRSS23 TOP2A NECTIN1 ATF2 KIF11 VBP1 CHRD TP53 TIA1
WNT5A TBL1XR1 TP53 PKMYT1 TCF3 SLC2A1 PRKACA CCNB1 JUN CAMK2G PRKACB PSMD3 PRICKLE4 MAZ FBXW11 TRA2B HRAS PSMC6 BIRC5 SYNCRIP
PLCB4 JUN
AURKA
WNT10A CASP10
NUDC SPTBN1 PPP3CB ACTR3 AATF SLC25A10 CCT6A RNPS1 WNT10B CCND3 PLCB4 NCL CACYBP CCND2 WWP1
EGFR FNDC3B
PSEN2 TBL1XR1 CBY1
CCDC9 MRPS18B MORC3
SLC39A6 ILF2 LEF1 SENP2 TLE2 PSMA1 CDK4 WNT5A ATN1 CDC25A CLPTM1 PRPF40A NCBP2 RBX1 SMAD4 PARP1 KPNB1 SNRNP40 QKI
CSNK2A1 WNT6 YWHAZ MAP3K7 DEK CTBP2 SRSF1
PALLD PSEN1 DTL
PFN1 ARID1A CCT7 AATF EIF3B
ZNRF3 ATIC DDX11 DAZAP2 CCND1 PUM2
TCF7L1 UBAP2L UBE2M PRICKLE1 EP300 HNRNPU TFAP2A MAP3K7
CAND1 SSRP1 OPA1 PFDN2 NOLC1 ILF3 SENP2
CCNB1 WNT3A KIF11 TOP2A CCND2 CAMK2G APC BUB3 SOCS5 KARS CDC25C CDKN2C KLC1
PPP4R1 CAMK2B
PPP2CA PORCN PPP3CC CCT5 WDR5 TNPO1 RANBP2 EFEMP2 KARS CDKN1A CTBP1
CCT3 LRP6
CCND1 NRIP1
PSMA4 FZD1 OTUB1 POLR3E PPP3CA SLC16A1
XPO1 NCBP2 PSMB3 CSNK1A1
NFATC3 PRKACB CSNK1E
SNTA1 SRSF10 RUVBL1 PPP4C CUL1
RFNG CREBBP
RUVBL1
CDKN2C TCF7L1 NLK SFN HSPA4 MAPK10
GNB1 WNT7A
ACP1 LAMC1 TBL1X PSME3 RBX1 GNL3 PTPN11 TCF7L2
DEK ACRV1 UBQLN1 PAPOLA PLK1
PAFAH1B1 TOMM20 C1QBP XRCC5 APC2 UCK2
HSP90AA1 RRS1 CCT2 TYMS
SMAD3 HNRNPR SUMO1 NR3C1 TACR1 RECQL5 TLE3 SIAH1 TUBG1 SKP1 TCF7L2 NCBP2 PRKCG FBXW11 NFATC3 UBE2V2 PPP4C MRPL3 BUB3 CCT7 AZIN1 NLK FZD4 FZD7
YWHAZ RBM39 RFC5 HDAC1 HSPA13
NSD2 ATXN1 NUP62 SIAH1 DAAM1
PLSCR1 SKP1 MAPK10 NUP98
SSBP2 SRSF2 CTBP2 CTNNB1 DKC1 RACGAP1 KHDRBS1 NUDC PRKCA UBE2D2 PLSCR3 SOD1 PRKACB CTBP1 HSPE1 SMAD2
MAPK8 TBL1X RBPMS TRIP13 JAG2
CTPS1 FZD7 CREBBP RANBP2 PTTG1IP NOL9 PPP3CB FBLN1 KIF2C TLE1 KIF11 PARP1 IL6ST
LGR4 CBX3 DEK NFATC1 SFRP1 RAD21
TBL1X RBX1 CUL1 CCT6A KHDRBS1 PPP3CA SOX2
NCOA1 SKP1 HSP90AA1 EP300 SIAH1 HMGB2 PAICS FAM107A TOP1
PRKCA CSNK1A1 PTBP1 CUL1 TCF7L2 WNT11 HGS
EFNB2 ILF3 NIPSNAP2 UBE2N ATP5G1 FZD2 DVL1 CSE1L TLE4 PSMB3 LAMC1 DVL3 ROCK2 BOP1
RBPMS SCUBE3 APC FRAT2 DDX1
HNRNPA3 PAM
MAPK9 STK24
RAN DAAM2 NDUFS6
YWHAB
SMAD4 SERPINF1 SKP2 CSNK1A1 SMC3 CDK4 YY1 CDK1 PPP3CB EWSR1 ALCAM DHX15 SFRP2 NOL11 LRP5 CTBP2 GSK3B DDX18 POLE2 CTPS1 SCP2 SRC RYK HRAS G3BP1 CD151 UBQLN1 MTERF3 MYC
ROCK2
RHOA NUP98 DIP2C YWHAG
HDAC2 DAZAP2 CDC20 SRSF10 VSNL1 PNN PPP2CA ILF2 DNM1L WDR77 ROCK2 FBXW11 CCT3 CCT3 REEP5 TLE1 FKBP8 ROR1
PAFAH1B1 IRAK1
HMGB3 ROR1 SFRP1 RIN1 ADRM1 SNRPG CCT5 HOMER3 CAMSAP2 EIF3B MAPRE1 PSMC6 TCF3 UBE2N DTNB
CTNNB1 VBP1 TBL1XR1
LEF1 AZIN1 HSPA9 PAICS LAMP1 RELA CAND1 KLC1 PPARD PHLDA1 ATXN1 CDH2 AHSA1 TLE4 PRICKLE3 ELOC CDC20 CALU MAD2L1
BTRC
DUT UBE2G1 ATP6V0D1 TLE4
PA2G4 PAEP RSL1D1 MAPK9
GPC4 AURKA FZD1
C1S KCNJ4 PPP2R5E SLC39A6
PRICKLE4 PICK1 ATP5C1 APLP2 SMC4 PPP2CA PPP4R1 CACYBP UPF1
GABARAP
TRIP13 QKI HMGB2 SRRM1 WNT2 CTNND2
CSE1L CAV1 PLCB1 AZIN1 SMAD4 FZD6
TBK1 MAP3K1 RAE1 SRP19 NAB1
CANX LRP5 CSNK2A3
DNAJA1 PNN CCND1 APPBP2
USP1 CANX GAS1
BRD3 POLR3E EFNB3
JUN
RRM2 UBE2D3
PSEN1
ATP2C1 AIMP1
RAD23A CEBPG CBX3 RAD23A STOM UBE2D2
DNAJB6 PRICKLE1 SLC16A1 ATF2 SKP2 TCF7L1 AXIN1 CTNNB1 CLU EWSR1 STRN3 COPS5 DAAM2 MAP3K7 EIF3A
DIMT1 XRCC6 CSNK1G2 DKC1 POLR3E BTRC WNT4 NSD2 CDC27 RYK YWHAG SRSF2 PRMT1
SFRP1 NADK UBE2M
KIF2A CAMK2D
CCND2
CDC27 KIF2C CDC27 TIMP3 ISOC2
CAV1
ANGPTL2 TLE1 PPP3CC
PRPF40A FZD7 ATP6V0C FYN APC
SSR1 SFRP4
MRPL3 ACP1 RAC3
TOMM34
CALU HSPA4 SFRP4
FKBP4 RELA MARS
HSPA13
DKK1 DAAM1 PSD3 FUBP1 TSR1 DDX1 CBX1
XRCC5 NCKAP1
PUM2 DAAM1 PLOD2 RANBP9 ARHGDIA APPBP2 CDC25A
ATF2
COIL JMJD1C CIB1 DHX9 GAK SRP19 SQSTM1 RSL1D1 CEP57 RRS1
LAPTM4B BRD2
ANXA1 TIA1 DLG3 PRSS23
TFDP1 RFC3 QKI IDE CCHCR1 SYNCRIP TAF9 PPP3R1 COL4A2 GSK3B CYLD
ACTR1A NAB1 OPA1 CANX
REV3L
UBQLN1
HNRNPH1 ARIH1 CTNNA1 PRICKLE2 HIF1A NCKIPSD SMC3 PFDN2 EIF3B TFDP2 ATN1
SPTBN1 FTSJ1 MTERF3 NKD1
PSMA1 LRP6
CEBPB RNF43 DNAJA1 GSN NOXA1 GSK3B DNAJC10 MTA1
PTEN REL CKAP5 SUMO2 WNT5B AIMP2 RAB11FIP2 MLF2
WNT5A TRIP6
ERBB3
UPF3A ADSL
ROR1 BZW1 CD44 TLE3
LGR5
PTPN11 ZHX2
YTHDF3 FZD6 NUP85 NFIB TRIP13 AR
AXIN2
ANAPC11
BRWD1 TOPBP1
FZD1 FOSL1 NOL11
PSEN1 EPS8 SUMO1 MTMR4
AXIN1 TK1
MAPK8
PNN NIPBL SF3A2 TM4SF1 FN1
HNRNPDL ARL1
ENAH AKAP8L POLE2 MOB4
ATP2B1 PRKCG
NUP153 HSPA8 GNB2
NTRK2 PRKACA
CXXC4 VANGL2
PPP1R13L PDLIM7 COBLL1 CD164 TRIM27
TM4SF1
ANXA4 FRAT2
GPC4 ARF4 YY1
RANBP9
AXIN2
ASB13 OAT
SFRP2 PLAG1
TACC1 PLCB4
RANBP2 ATP13A3
CDC26 LMNA
WISP1 NUP98
FILIP1L PWP1
BCL11A TBCD IPO5 AMD1 TGFA
VANGL1
KDELR3
PRKCB TUBB6 MAP1LC3B ATXN1
WNT3A
EGFR CDH11 EIF3J JUP
FERMT2
PLCB1 NAV3
SERBP1
NRXN1
MPZL1 SQSTM1 NLK
ZNRF3
ATP5G1
BCL7A
ROR2
PTS CYR61 ASB13 FZD5 PML BAIAP2 ZMYM4 ATR UBR5
CDH11 ARF4 IMMT
RCN2 GRB2
LTBP2
LGR4 CTNNA1 PAXIP1
TUBB2A COIL INVS APC2 SENP2 TRIM27 PTK2
HIF1AN
UCHL1
SERPINF1 CYBA VIM
NR3C1
FBLN1 FRAT2
MCL1
IL6ST
FZD3
WNT5B
ATIC
TNPO1
JUNB
DKK2 CELF2 FRAT1
GPRC5A HIF1AN
CDC26
PAM ITGA2 UBE2I AXIN2
WNT3A
DKK1
CTNND2
CTNNBIP1 VAMP2
GABARAPL2
AXIN1
SH3BGRL
DKK1
RER1
RAB11FIP2
PLCB2
CA12
TTC3 NRP2
TPD52L1
INVS MYCBP2
MMP7 FRAT1
ANAPC11
NBEA
NFATC2
WISP1
FZD10
PRKCB
NKD2
NCF1
RSPO3
FZD8
APC2
MMP7 B Human CNV genes interact with Hedgehog signaling pathway genes in multiple tissues Kidney Heart Brain
PKNOX1
NIPBL
GRK3
NKTR PTCH1
PLOD2
DHX15
AASDHPPT
LUC7L3
PSMC6
ADAM10
ATP2B1 DNAJC10
FMR1 VIM
GRK2
BZW1
CBX1
IMMT EML4
TROVE2
PRPF4B
PWP1
PRR11
HNRNPR
PPP2CA
PIK3CA
SPAG9
ZMYND11
POU2F1
SRSF1
ZNF146
MAP4K5
NCK1 DDX1
GAS1
CSNK1G3
KPNA6
CBX3
E2F4
CSNK1A1
DEK PSMA1
FZD7
KIF3A
ARHGAP5
DICER1 PRKACB
E2F1 PIK3R1
CCT6A SMG1 SS18 PAPOLA
CSNK1G1
ABLIM1 PAXIP1 HSPH1 NDE1
CCT5
EPS8
CALCOCO2 CEP350
SPOP
PUM2
PNN
TNPO1
CBFB
BRAP
RMI1 CCND2
SPOPL
DVL2
ARL1
CCNB1 SMURF2 CDKN1A
TRIP13 RTN4
GPR161
SRSF10 GTF2H1
SPOP
UBE2G2
PRPF40A
NDRG1 JPT1
HSPA4 FLRT2
MAP3K7
FEN1 SMARCA2 TCF3
SYNCRIP
CDK1
RAN DCBLD2
SF3B1
NFATC2IP CBX3 USP1
BRD1
ARHGDIA NCOA2
YWHAG
GNL3 CAND1
TAF9
FYN
CCT2 TACC1 CHD8
UBQLN1 POLR3E SPOPL
CEP350 SMC4
IMMT DDHD1 CDC25A CASK
BIRC5
UBE2I CUL1 KIF3A NCBP2 CKAP5
NUDC CCND1 DUT EIF3A
CSNK1E NUP153 SCYL2
CNOT1 MARCH6
ITCH RANGAP1
ARHGAP5 RAD54B
PTBP1
RACGAP1
UBE2V2
TRIM27 UBE2I KMT2A UBN1
CTCF
CUL4B
RNPS1 RTN3 UCK2 ACTL6A
GLI2 PRKACB KDELR3 RAD54B
DAB2 TRIM2
PPP2R5E SUMO1
ENSA
MGRN1 GSK3B
CSE1L CSNK1D LAMC1 CCNA2 DAZAP2
WDR77 TTC3 DLG1 PAFAH1B1 ATP2B4 MKI67
CDK4 KARS CCNB1 BRWD1 SKP2
CCNB1
AIMP2
PPP2R1A
ETF1
GNB2 SLC39A6
ASXL1 PRIM1 TNPO1
CDK6
WDFY3 TPM1 TMPO SHANK2 EZR
BTRC PKP4
HNRNPU COPS6 RXRB
CSNK1G3 RASA1 MYC
BRCA1 MEN1 AURKA YES1 DKC1 DUT BUB3 ERC1
ATP6V0D1
NOVA1
PRKACB
CDK1
PA2G4 MTF2 ALCAM
XRCC5 NSD2 EIF3B AGO2
DNAJC10 DEK
TARDBP ATXN1 RACGAP1 TRA2B SON
USP1 PPP4R1 MGRN1 ADAM10 CDK1
MYLK GNAQ HSPA13 CSNK1G2 KIF11 ANXA1 BIRC5 RAN CDK4 CUL1 SMURF1 IGFBP5 CSNK1G1
C18orf25
ILF3 TOMM20 CCT5 SLC39A6 CAPRIN1 PPP2CA CSNK1G2 KIF11
CCND2
HMGB1 WDR77 FGFR1 HMGB2
HNRNPAB CAND1
MRPL42
RRM2 SMAD2 CDC20
CCT5 UBE2D3
HNRNPU SRSF10 NDE1
AZIN1 CUL4B SMARCC1 OAT NCOA3
MTUS1 TMX1 SMARCC1
RANBP2 SSRP1
SMAD3 DKC1
PAICS PSMD14 MCM4 TRIM28
BOC CCND1 DIP2C
HDAC1 GRB2 COPS5 HNRNPAB
ZDHHC17
PA2G4
SUGP2
CSNK1D
PLSCR1 GTSE1
ZNF263 ATIC PRKACA SMARCA4
RUNX1 DNAJB6 CCNA2 SMAD4 BRCA1 AP3B1
CHD4 SMURF2 PSME3 PSMD14 PPP4C UBA2
CCT6A
GLP1R ILF3
SKP2 ATP2B4 ILF3
CDK4
HMOX2
HSPA4 HERPUD1
AATF CCT3 NCKIPSD BOP1
CSNK1E TACC3
CSNK1A1
CCNA2 POLR3E RAE1 CHD3 AATF
EWSR1
HDAC1 OTUB1 MAPK1
PPP6C
TMPO BUB3 HMGB2
BCL2L11 DNAJB6 LTBP2 SPOP SRSF10 BAG6 HHIP
ADAMTSL3 RANBP9
RELA EWSR1
UBE2M
E2F1
BMPR1A KDM5C CDKN1A NCBP2 CSNK1A1 DLG1 PIK3R1
CSE1L SSRP1 SMARCD1 USP7 CDH11 ADGRL1 CCT7
HSPA4 CDON FBL RAB2A TMX1 SMURF1 BOP1 CDC20
YWHAB
NRXN2
HNRNPA3
STOM PRPF40A
UBE2M PAICS
CDC27 SMARCC2
SGSM2 ADRM1
MRPL3 AATF NOLC1
ARRB2 BRD4 UBE2D3
PTCH1
CCT6A GFPT1 SSRP1 RUNX2 PPP2CA KIAA0368 TXNDC9 CPSF6
PSMD3
RELA
CREBBP
EVC ATIC TCOF1 CSNK2A1
UBE2I USP1
GNA11 BARD1 NUDC PSME3 WDR77 RASA1 XRCC6 GOLGA2 SMARCA4
NUDC KIF11 ARRB2
ZNF764
MCM7 EIF3A TUBG1
ARID1A
CUL1
TNFAIP1
CCND2
GLI1 ERBB3
HMGXB4 RANBP9 ESRRA
HAP1
IL6ST POLR3E PPP4C CSNK1D BAG6
CCT3 KIF3A PRKD2
ARRB2 SMARCC2 PAPOLA CCND1
ESR1
UBR5
SMAD2 PTBP1
BOP1 NCBP2
UBE2M ARRB1 ADCY1 UPF3A HMGN4
ATXN2L CSNK1G2 EIF3B
GLI3 HGS
BCL2
E2F1
NRP2 ILF2
CTNNA1
TOMM20 PSMC6
SETDB1 MAZ
CLPTM1 RAD21
AIMP1 CCT2 RNPS1
HSPA13
CASK EPHB4
GSK3B
SYNCRIP
CCNF
RELA ATIC
H2AFZ
ARHGDIA CSNK1E
AZIN1 BCAP31
PAX8 BAIAP2 NTRK3
AIMP2 CSNK1G3
DHH VARS GTSE1
BCL2 EZH2
HNRNPA3 SNTA1 FZD7
TMCC1 CAND1 EGFR
ATRX
DBN1 FBXW11 THRA E2F4 TOMM20 PPP4C SKI RAN
ARRB1 NOL11
MGRN1
IRF3 MTA1
CCNF SEC62
BAX
SAP18 SF3B1 SUFU DNAJB6
AZIN1
DVL2
SMURF2
MYCBP NDE1 TNPO1
DDX1
GAS1
SMURF1 ATN1 ARFGAP1 PRKACA TUBB3 DLGAP4
E2F4 ELK1 EWSR1 DLG1 TAF9
GNB2
GSK3B
NECTIN1
MEGF8 DKC1
IHH
MAPK10
TFDP2 PAEP BNIP3L
LAMA4 MINK1
SUFU
SAP18 DMPK GPI EEF1E1 PPP2R5E
COPS2 LRP2
AP2S1
MYO9B BCL2
GRK2 PTP4A3
RB1
SRSF3 SCYL2 GLI3 SOX13
TCF3
CTNNA1 ARRB1
SMO
FKBP8 AGPAT1
CUL4B
TMBIM6 ATF1 TRIP13 VARS PPP2R1A MFI2 MRPL42 CYP2A6 RNPS1
STK35
PKMYT1 PTK7
HRAS
AURKA RET
CACTIN
AGO2
GRK2
PTPN11
FZR1
PSMC2 EPS8 TIMP3
IL6ST
SPOPL
SHH
ATP2B4 PRKACA MEF2D PLOD3 GSK3A NPTXR
COL6A1 EFEMP2
ZNF446
DMWD GRK6
FLYWCH1 COIL
OTUB1
RANBP9
GPR161 GNB2 DNAJC4 DAZAP2 RCN3 STRN4 MFAP1
CD151
RPL7L1 UBN1
MID1IP1
DBN1 RIN1
NUCB1
PFN1
ARHGEF40 BNIP3L
BTRC
SFTPC
SMAD3
ZBTB43
PTCH2
SSBP2
GLI2
GAS1 UBQLN1
FXYD5
ZNF263
PPP1CA
COL6A2 HGS
RARB TAOK2 ADD3
BAD ADAM10
PLA2G6
GRK3 RBPMS EDA
HOXB5 RERE
JAG1 ATN1
LAMB2
MUC3A
CSNK1G1 FBXL18
BCL2L11
UBE2L3
SFRP1
PRKACG
AGPAT2
IGF1R DRD2
ATXN1
SUFU
DIP2C
JAK3
GPR161 ACRV1
HRH3 FLNA
MID1
PLSCR1
MCL1
CDON
FZD7
COL4A2
SVIL
SLC17A7
ZNF764
MEGF8
GLI3
BOC PTCH1 CNV/neurodevelopmental gene Signaling pathway gene Connector gene