DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning for Language Use in Education: Best Practices and Practical Steps to Improve Learning Outcomes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning for Language Use in Education: Best Practices and Practical Steps to Improve Learning Outcomes PLANNING FOR LANGUAGE USE IN EDUCATION: BEST PRACTICES AND PRACTICAL STEPS TO IMPROVE LEARNING OUTCOMES EdData II: Data for Education Research and Programming (DERP) in Africa AUGUST 2015 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by RTI International. Cover photo: A student working on her writing skills in Uganda, supported through USAID/Uganda School Health and Reading Program (SHRP). Photo by Medina Korda RTI International. 2015. Planning for Language Use in Education: Best Practices and Practical Steps to Improve Learning Outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Agency for International Development. The views expressed by the authors at RTI International do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Planning for Language Use in Education: Best Practices and Practical Steps to Improve Learning Outcomes Prepared for USAID Bureau for Africa United States Agency for International Development Prepared by Alison Pflepsen With contributions from Carol Benson, Colette Chabbott, and Agatha van Ginkel RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road Post Office Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Table of Contents Tables ............................................................................................................................................ iv Figures............................................................................................................................................ iv Boxes ............................................................................................................................................ iv Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. v Introduction .................................................................................................................................... vi Concepts and definitions ................................................................................................................ ix 1 Rationale for more effective language planning in education ............................................ 1 1.1 Context and benefits ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Putting research into practice .................................................................................. 2 2 Key factors to consider when planning for language use in education ............................... 5 2.1 Research on language, literacy, and learning.......................................................... 6 2.1.1 Summary of the research ............................................................................ 6 2.1.2 Language models and LOI transition .......................................................... 8 2.1.3 Research implications for planning ............................................................ 9 2.2 Relationship between LOI and the goals of the education system ....................... 13 2.3 Sociolinguistic context .......................................................................................... 15 2.3.1 Language environment.............................................................................. 15 2.3.2 Language development and standardization ............................................. 17 2.4 Educational context ............................................................................................... 18 2.5 Stakeholder considerations ................................................................................... 21 3 Recommendations and steps for planning for language use in education ........................ 23 3.1 Conduct situation analysis and assemble country-specific information ............... 27 3.2 Engage a wide range of stakeholders and conduct social advocacy ..................... 29 3.3 Identify pedagogical approach and specific languages to use .............................. 31 3.4 Support language standardization and development ............................................. 33 3.5 Develop curriculum, materials and assessment for target languages, grades and subjects ........................................................................................................... 34 3.6 Align teacher training, recruitment, and placement with language policies and practice ........................................................................................................... 36 3.7 Develop and implement a language policy and/or language plan ........................ 37 3.8 Monitor and evaluate outcomes ............................................................................ 41 4 Conclusion: Summary and way forward........................................................................... 42 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................. 44 ii Annexes Annex A. Detailed literature review of worldwide evidence and best practices on L1- based multilingual instruction .................................................................................... 58 Annex B. Language models ....................................................................................................... 66 Annex C. Language competencies and vocabulary thresholds .................................................. 68 Annex D. Exploring language goals in relation to LOI planning .............................................. 69 Annex E. Planning for language use in education: Illustrative timeline and activities ............. 71 Annex F. Country situational analysis worksheet for planning for language use in education .................................................................................................................... 74 Annex G. Resources for planning for language use in education .............................................. 79 iii Tables Table 1. Evidence-based responses to frequently cited concerns about L1-based instruction .................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2. Summary of language models common references in LOI discussions ...................... 9 Table 3. Conditions for effective language plan development and implementation ............... 26 Figures Figure 1. Research on language and learning: Key ideas for effective language planning ....................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2. Relationship between language use in education and goals of the education system ........................................................................................................................ 15 Figure 3. Factors to consider when planning for language use in education ............................ 23 Figure 4. Steps to take for effective language planning ............................................................ 25 Boxes Box 1. Questions to explore language, literacy, and learning .................................................... 12 Box 2. Questions to explore LOI and the goals of the education system ..................................... 14 Box 3. Questions to explore the sociolinguistic context ............................................................... 18 Box 4. Questions to explore language and educational context .................................................. 20 Box 5. Questions to explore LOI and stakeholder engagement ................................................... 22 iv Abbreviations ADEA Association for Development of Education in Africa CAL Center for Applied Linguistics CEFR Common European Framework Reference for Languages DFID British Department for International Development EGAT/ED USAID Bureau of Economic Growth Agriculture and Trade, Office of Education EGRA Early Grade Reading Assessment EQUIP2 Education Quality Improvement Program KEP Kom language program (Cambodia) L1, L2 first and second language LOI language of instruction LOLT language of learning and teaching LWC language of wider communication M&E monitoring and evaluation MLE multilingual education MOI medium of instruction MTB-MLE mother tongue-based multilingual education MTPDS Malawi Teacher Professional Development Support (program) NGO nongovernmental organization PIRLS Progress in International Reading Literacy Study PRIMR Primary Math and Reading Initiative (Kenya) READ TA Reading for Ethiopia’s Achievement Developed, Technical Assistance (project) RTI RTI International (registered trademark and trade name of Research Triangle Institute) SACMEQ Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality TIMSS Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study UIL UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund USAID United States Agency for International Development v Introduction The concept of Education for All, as operationalized by the Millennium Development Goals, drives current efforts in educational development. The assumption underlying the expansion of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vowel Harmony in Chiru Mechek Sampar Awan, Ph.D
    ================================================================= Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 17:7 July 2017 UGC Approved List of Journals Serial Number 49042 ================================================================ Vowel Harmony in Chiru Mechek Sampar Awan, Ph.D. Scholar ================================================= Abstract This paper is an attempt to describe vowel harmony in Chiru. Chiru is an endangered Kuki-Chin language of Tibeto-Burman language family (Grierson 1904) spoken by 8599 speakers (Census of India: 2011). Harmony is a term used in phonology to refer to the way the articulation of one phonological unit is influenced by another unit in the same word or phrase (Crystal 1997). An analogous notion is that of assimilation. The two main processes are consonant harmony and vowel harmony. Interestingly vowel harmony is found only in a few languages among Kuki-Chin groups, viz., Biate, Chiru etc. Most of the Kuki-Chin languages like Thadou, do not have vowel harmony. The vowel harmony in Chiru mainly occurs in pronominal prefixes and genitives of the first and third persons, causative prefixes, numeral prefixes and a few disyllabic words. This phonological process in Chiru is due to the regressive assimilation of vowels in which the vowel phoneme in the first syllable is influenced by the vowel phoneme in the following syllable to become identical to each other in a word. Keywords: Chiru, Kuki-Chin, Vowel harmony Introduction Chiru, the language spoken by the Chiru people, belongs to the Kuki-Chin group of the Tibeto-Burman language family (Grierson 1904). Chiru is one of the thirty-three recognised tribal languages of Manipur. The total population of Chiru speakers is only 8599 (census of India: 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Imperatives in Language Planning
    Demographic Imperatives In Language Planning Lachman M Khubchandani Centre for Communication Studies Pune [email protected] Elitist Moorings In the realm of language policy-making and language planning we tend to 'perceive' languages in monolitihic terms. Language rights movements also generally focus attention on monistic aspects of language A or language B. in everyday life. We may identify languages as 'strong' or 'weak' in categorical terms. But when looking at the scene in a plurilingual paradigm, we need to devise a scale plotting stronger and weaker languages in relative terms which respond in a unique manner to the space-and time-bound institutional reality, viz. language accreditation by the state, identity aspirations of a speech community, accessibility of a language in everyday communication. In the entire process of language planning (it also includes language policy-making), the common man - the 'consumer' of LP programs - is present only by proxy, carrying the elite 'cross'. It is mainly the custodians of languages who decide loftily what is 'good' for the masses, by the virtue of their hold on the socio-political and literary scene (Khubchandani 1983: 149). A few remarks from the critique of language planning (Khubchandani 1997) may be relevant here "The notion of language planning in its exhaustive sense is a relatively new concept 1 [ 1 ]. Its models, to a large extent, are influenced by those in the spheres of industrial and agricultural planning. From the narrow linguistic concerns of 'intellectual fostering' of the standard languages (Prague School 1932, Tauli 1968), the canvas of language planning is now enlarged to include language as an object of human manipulation, introducing, the cost-benefit and 1 A distinct enquiry concerning the issues of language planning is attributed to the 1996 Airlie House Conference held in the United States (Fishman et al 1968); it was followed up by the 1969 Conference on corpus language planning at the East-west Center, Honolulu (Rubin and Jernudd 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistics As a Resouvce in Language Planning. 16P
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 095 698 FL 005 720 AUTHOR Garvin, Paul L. TITLE' Linguistics as a Resouvce in Language Planning. PUB DATE Jun 73 NOTE 16p.; PaFPr presented at the Symposium on Sociolinguistics and Language Planning (Mexico City, Mexico, June-July, 1973) EPRS PPICE MF-$0.75 HC-$1.50 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Applied Linguistics; Language Development; *Language Planning; Language Role; Language Standardization; Linguistics; Linguistic Theory; Official Languages; Social Planning; *Sociolinguistics ABSTPACT Language planning involves decisions of two basic types: those pertaining to language choice and those pertaining to language development. linguistic theory is needed to evaluate the structural suitability of candidate languages, since both official and national languages mast have a high level of standardizaticn as a cultural necessity. On the other hand, only a braodly conceived and functionally oriented linguistics can serve as a basis for choosiag one language rather than another. The role of linguistics in the area of language development differs somewhat depending on whether development is geared in a technological and scientific or a literary, artistic direction. In the first case, emphasis is on the development of terminologies, and in the second case, on that of grammatical devices and styles. Linguistics can provide realistic and practical arguments in favor of language development, and a detailed, technical understanding of such development, as well as methodological skills. Linguists can and must function as consultants to those who actually make decisions about language planning. For too long linguists have pursued only those aims generated within their own field. They must now broaden their scope to achieve the kind of understanding of language that is necessary for a productive approach to concrete language problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naga Language Groups Within the Tibeto-Burman Language Family
    TheNaga Language Groups within the Tibeto-Burman Language Family George van Driem The Nagas speak languages of the Tibeto-Burman fami­ Ethnically, many Tibeto-Burman tribes of the northeast ly. Yet, according to our present state of knowledge, the have been called Naga in the past or have been labelled as >Naga languages< do not constitute a single genetic sub­ >Naga< in scholarly literature who are no longer usually group within Tibeto-Burman. What defines the Nagas best covered by the modern more restricted sense of the term is perhaps just the label Naga, which was once applied in­ today. Linguistically, even today's >Naga languages< do discriminately by Indo-Aryan colonists to all scantily clad not represent a single coherent branch of the family, but tribes speaking Tibeto-Burman languages in the northeast constitute several distinct branches of Tibeto-Burman. of the Subcontinent. At any rate, the name Naga, ultimately This essay aims (1) to give an idea of the linguistic position derived from Sanskrit nagna >naked<, originated as a titu­ of these languages within the family to which they belong, lar label, because the term denoted a sect of Shaivite sadhus (2) to provide a relatively comprehensive list of names and whose most salient trait to the eyes of the lay observer was localities as a directory for consultation by scholars and in­ that they went through life unclad. The Tibeto-Burman terested laymen who wish to make their way through the tribes labelled N aga in the northeast, though scantily clad, jungle of names and alternative appellations that confront were of course not Hindu at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Differences in Beliefs About English Language Policies (Elps): the Case of Saudi Higher Education English Departments
    International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies ISSN: 2202-9478 www.ijels.aiac.org.au Gender Differences in Beliefs about English Language Policies (ELPs): The Case of Saudi Higher Education English Departments Suliman Mohammed Nasser Alnasser* Department of English Language and Literature, College of Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Corresponding author: Suliman Mohammed Nasser Alnasser, E-mail: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history Review of literature suggests that issues in English language policies (ELPs) in higher education Received: March 2, 2018 foreign language department levels have not been addressed, and the relationship between Accepted: April 28, 2018 beliefs about general notions of ELPs and gender has been disregarded. The current study Published: April 30, 2018 investigates gender-related differences in beliefs on five main notions of ELPs among staff Volume: 6 Issue: 2 members in Saudi Arabian English departments. An online survey was administered to staff members in different Saudi English departments from different regions in Saudi Arabia. Five general statements on ELPs were included in the survey and were responded to by male (n = 67) Conflicts of interest: None and female (n = 143) staff members (total = 210). Pearson’s chi-square test of independence and Funding: None the calculated percentages of responses were used to analyze gender differences. No statistically significant differences were found between male and female participants, with the exception of one statement. Both genders had generally similar beliefs on ELPs. Moreover, the female staff had slightly stronger beliefs than the male staff, and males showed more hesitation than females did when deciding on ELP matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Status: on the Limits of Language Planning
    Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 39, 2010, 41-58 doi: 10.5774/39-0-3 Language and status: On the limits of language planning Lloyd Hill 1 Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland, South Africa Email: [email protected] Abstract 'Language status' is a concept that has been central to South African language policy debates since the early days of the negotiated transition, which culminated in the 1996 Constitutional commitment to developing eleven official languages. This constitutional commitment has not however been translated into a concrete legislative and administrative agenda. Recent critiques of language policy have attributed this 'policy gap' to problems associated with policy implementation. In this article I argue that policy difficulties can equally be attributed to theoretical problems associated with the concept of 'language status', which have their origins in a broader international discourse on language planning. This article is therefore presents a sociological critique of 'language planning', based on a conceptual analysis of key terms that underpin the current debate on language policy: principally 'language', 'language planning' and 'status.' Keywords : Language politics, language policy, language planning, corpus planning, status planning 1. Introduction "A language is a dialect with an army and a navy."2 This well known comment – attributed to Max Weinreich in 1945 – marked the beginning of a new era in the study of language in society. Weinreich's controversial assertion about the historical significance of political conflict in language standardisation also hints at a crucial ontological issue in debates on the meaning of language: to what extent can the status attributed to a language be distinguished from the status associated with those who speak it? 'Language status' is a concept that has been central to South African language policy debates since the early 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Perspectives on Language Planning and Policy in Africa: Accounting for the Notion of Multilingualism
    Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS, Vol. 38, 2009, 1-11 doi: 10.5842/38-0-50 Critical perspectives on language planning and policy in Africa: Accounting for the notion of multilingualism Felix Banda Linguistics Department, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper draws on the notion of multilingualism as social practice (Heller 2007) to critique postcolonial language planning and policies in Africa. Drawing on illustrations from Ethnologue 's (2009) languages of Africa, studies on language planning and policy in Africa, and recent developments in harmonisation of cross-border language research (Prah 1998; Banda 2008), the paper argues that there are distortions in the conceptualisation of multilingualism and what it entails in Africa's socio-cultural contexts. In turn, the paper faults monolingual biases in the notions and models used to describe and promote multilingualism in Africa, which mirror descriptions of the language situation in Western socio-cultural contexts. The paper argues for cross-linguistic and cross-border status and corpus planning to take advantage of multilingualism as a linguistic resource for socio- economic development in Africa. The paper concludes by highlighting the prospects for linguistic repertoire-based multilingual models for language planning and policy in Africa. Keywords : multilingualism, language policy, linguistic repertoire, urbanization, postcolonial 1. Introduction The aim of the paper is to critique the monolingual characterisation that has informed language planning and policy in Africa. This entails an exploration of the utility of certain language planning and policy pronouncements, as well as models arising out of these.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section H
    H (The sound) H.P. 15 (Bomber) Giha (African people) [P235.5] USE Handley Page V/1500 (Bomber) Ikiha (African people) BT Consonants H.P. 42 (Transport plane) Kiha (African people) Phonetics USE Handley Page H.P. 42 (Transport plane) Waha (African people) H-2 locus H.P. 80 (Jet bomber) BT Ethnology—Tanzania UF H-2 system USE Victor (Jet bomber) Hāʾ (The Arabic letter) BT Immunogenetics H.P. 115 (Supersonic plane) BT Arabic alphabet H 2 regions (Astrophysics) USE Handley Page 115 (Supersonic plane) HA 132 Site (Niederzier, Germany) USE H II regions (Astrophysics) H.P.11 (Bomber) USE Hambach 132 Site (Niederzier, Germany) H-2 system USE Handley Page Type O (Bomber) HA 500 Site (Niederzier, Germany) USE H-2 locus H.P.12 (Bomber) USE Hambach 500 Site (Niederzier, Germany) H-8 (Computer) USE Handley Page Type O (Bomber) HA 512 Site (Niederzier, Germany) USE Heathkit H-8 (Computer) H.P.50 (Bomber) USE Hambach 512 Site (Niederzier, Germany) H-19 (Military transport helicopter) USE Handley Page Heyford (Bomber) HA 516 Site (Niederzier, Germany) USE Chickasaw (Military transport helicopter) H.P. Sutton House (McCook, Neb.) USE Hambach 516 Site (Niederzier, Germany) H-34 Choctaw (Military transport helicopter) USE Sutton House (McCook, Neb.) Ha-erh-pin chih Tʻung-chiang kung lu (China) USE Choctaw (Military transport helicopter) H.R. 10 plans USE Ha Tʻung kung lu (China) H-43 (Military transport helicopter) (Not Subd Geog) USE Keogh plans Ha family (Not Subd Geog) UF Huskie (Military transport helicopter) H.R.D. motorcycle Here are entered works on families with the Kaman H-43 Huskie (Military transport USE Vincent H.R.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Awkward Questions: Language Issues in the 2011 Census in England
    Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ISSN: 0143-4632 (Print) 1747-7557 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rmmm20 Awkward questions: language issues in the 2011 census in England Mark Sebba To cite this article: Mark Sebba (2017): Awkward questions: language issues in the 2011 census in England, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2017.1342651 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1342651 Published online: 30 Jun 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 7 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rmmm20 Download by: [Lancaster University] Date: 03 July 2017, At: 08:36 JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUAL AND MULTICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1342651 Awkward questions: language issues in the 2011 census in England Mark Sebba Department of Linguistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The 2011 Census in England broke new ground, as a question about Received 28 July 2016 language had never previously been asked. After stakeholder Accepted 10 June 2017 consultations and a series of trials, the census authority decided on two KEYWORDS questions based on earlier censuses in the USA: one about the ’ ‘ ’ Census; multilingualism; respondent s main language and another about proficiency in English. language policy; self- This paper provides a critique of the census questions, showing how the assessment of language pressure to produce questions which were straightforward to answer proficiency and consistent with the predominant monolingual ideology led to the choice of two questions which were problematic in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Schiffman, Harold F. TITLE Language and Society in South Asia. Final Report
    DOCUMEKT RESUNE ED 127 806 PL 007 948 AUTHOR Shapiro, Michael C.; Schiffman, Harold F. TITLE Language and Society in South Asia. Final Report. INSTITUTION Institute of International Studies (DHEW/OE), Washington, D.C. BUREAU NO BR-110012HH PUB DATE Sep 75 CONTRACT OEC-0-74-2093 NOTE 380p. EDRS PRICE MF-$C.83 Hc-$20.75 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Asian Studies; *Bilingualism; Burmese; Cultural Context; *Dialects; Dialect Studies; Dravidian Languages; Language Classification; *Language Variation; Linguistic Borrowing; Multilingualism; Regional Dialects; Social Dialects; *Sociolinguistics; Tibetan IDENTIFIERS *Asia (South); *Code Switching; Indo Aryan Languages; Munda Languages; Tibeto Burman Languages ABSTRACT This work attempts to provide an overview of liuguistic diversity in South Asia and to place this diversity in a cultural context. The work tries to describe the current state of knowledge concerning socially conditioned language variation in the subcontinent. Each of five major language families contains numerous mutually intelligible and unintelligible dialects. Different dialects of a language may be required for 'written and spoken use and for different social groups. Bilingualism and multilingualism are common for communication between groups. Language choice is important for education, politics, radio and television. Chapter 2 of this book enumerates criteria used in the taxonomy of language forms, discussing a number of theories of dialect formation from the points of view of linguistic innovation and diffusion of linguistic change. Chapter 3 surveys literature on classification of South Asian languages. Chapter 4 considers South Asia as a distinct linguistic area and Chapter 5 evaluates literature on South Asian social dialects. Chapter 6 examines linguistic codes encompassing elements from more than one autonomous language.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilingualism, Diglossia and Language Planning : Three Major Topics of Socio- Linguistic Concern in Belgium ·
    Bilingualism, Diglossia and Language Planning : Three Major Topics of Socio­ linguistic Concern in Belgium · door ROLAND Wll.LEMYNS The aim of this lecture is to introduce in a nutshell the linguistic or sociolinguistic problems to be encountered in Belgium and to discuss the ways they are currently being investigated by ( socio )linguists. Although one might theoretically distinguish between domestic and crossnational linguistic problems in Belgium, none are purely domestic since they are either in origin and/ or in their further de­ velopment, related to the fact that the different language groups in Belgium use a language which is not only used elswhere, hut is moreover used immediately across the national border. None of these language groups (Dutch, French and German) constitutes the centre of gravity of the evolution of these languages. Although I would not go as far as Haugen who says that every language in Belgium "belongs to its neighbours" (Haugen 1966: 928) it is obvious that the fact of speaking a so-called exoglottic language determines linguistic fate as well as intem;lation. Before turning to the linguistic situation of the Dutch speaking part of the country which will bear the main focus of my lecture, I should give you some basic information concerning the part played by language issues in Belgian politica! life, as wel! as the linguistic facts which account for it. I should like to start with a quotation from my Brussels collegue Hugo Baetens Beardsmore, a distinguis­ hed scholar of bilingualism : , , Language is the most explosive force in Belgian political life '' he says , , .. .language loyalties override all other questions that form part of the body politie of Belgian life, uniting conflicting ideologies, drawing to­ gether social classes with contradictory interests, producing bedfellows who without the common bond of a mutually shared language would have little contact" (Baetens Beardsmore 1980: 145 ).
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section I
    I(f) inhibitors I-270 (Ill. and Mo. : Proposed) I Ho Yüan (Peking, China) USE If inhibitors USE Interstate 255 (Ill. and Mo.) USE Yihe Yuan (Beijing, China) I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor (Ill.) I-270 (Md.) I-hsing ware USE Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage USE Interstate 270 (Md.) USE Yixing ware Corridor (Ill.) I-278 (N.J. and N.Y.) I-Kiribati (May Subd Geog) I & M Canal State Trail (Ill.) USE Interstate 278 (N.J. and N.Y.) UF Gilbertese USE Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail (Ill.) I-394 (Minn.) BT Ethnology—Kiribati I-5 USE Interstate 394 (Minn.) I-Kiribati language USE Interstate 5 I-395 (Baltimore, Md.) USE Gilbertese language I-10 USE Interstate 395 (Baltimore, Md.) I kuan tao (Cult) USE Interstate 10 I-405 (Wash.) USE Yi guan dao (Cult) I-15 USE Interstate 405 (Wash.) I language USE Interstate 15 I-470 (Ohio and W. Va.) USE Yi language I-15 (Fighter plane) USE Interstate 470 (Ohio and W. Va.) I-li Ho (China and Kazakhstan) USE Polikarpov I-15 (Fighter plane) I-476 (Pa.) USE Ili River (China and Kazakhstan) I-16 (Fighter plane) USE Blue Route (Pa.) I-li-mi (China) USE Polikarpov I-16 (Fighter plane) I-478 (New York, N.Y.) USE Taipa Island (China) I-17 USE Westway (New York, N.Y.) I-liu District (China) USE Interstate 17 I-495 (Mass.) USE Yiliu (Guangdong Sheng, China : Region) I-19 (Ariz.) USE Interstate 495 (Mass.) I-liu Region (China) USE Interstate 19 (Ariz.) I-495 (Md.
    [Show full text]