DOCSLIB.ORG

An Introduction to Ffmpeg Interacting with the Computer • Command-Line Interface (CLI) Graphical User Interface (GUI) Reto Kromer • AV Preservation by Reto.Ch •

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Introduction to Ffmpeg Interacting with the Computer • Command-Line Interface (CLI) Graphical User Interface (GUI) Reto Kromer • AV Preservation by Reto.Ch • An Introduction to FFmpeg Interacting with the computer • command-line interface (CLI) graphical user interface (GUI) Reto Kromer • AV Preservation by reto.ch • Open-Source Tools and Resources for Audio-Visual Archives Elías Querejeta Zine Eskola Donostia (San Sebastián), Spain 19, 21, 26 and 28 May 2020 1 2 Components Tools Libraries • ffmpeg • libavutil • ffplay • libavcodec The FFmpeg Family • ffprobe • libavformat • libavdevice • libavfilter • libswscale • libswresample 3 4 Audio-Visual Exemple Data Transformations QuickTime demultiplex WAVE demultiplex: libavformat ProRes 422 HQ pcm_s24le decode decode: libavcodec yuv422p10le filter filter: libavfilter pcm_s16le AAC encode yuv420p encode: libavcodec H.264 multiplex multiplex: libavformat MP4 5 6 File Transformations Metadata Extraction ffmpeg (CLI) MediaInfo (GUI, CLI) ➔ ffmpeg.org ➔ mediaarea.net/MediaInfo ffprobe (CLI) FFmpeg Cookbook for Archivists ➔ ffmpeg.org ➔ avpres.net/FFmpeg/ ffmprovisr ➔ amiaopensource.github.io/ffmprovisr/ 7 8 Media Player A GUI for FFmpeg VLC (GUI) FFCommand Engine (GUI) ➔ www.videolan.org/vlc/ ➔ github.com/ColorlabMD/FFCommand_Engine mpv (CLI) ➔ mpv.io version 0.6 for macOS via Homebrew: ffplay (CLI) brew tap avpres/formulae ➔ ffmpeg.org brew install --HEAD ffcommand-engine 9 10 avantages disavantages TIFF data easier DPX to process bigger files OpenEXR JPEG 2000 smaller files data complexer FFV1 to process 11 12 Single Images and Streams RAWcooked RAWcooked (CLI) • encoding into Matroska (.mkv) using FFV1 ➔ mediaarea.net/RAWcooked video codec and FLAC audio codec • all metadata preserved • decoding with bit-by-bit reversibility possibility to embed sidecar files, for • example MD5, LUT, XML, PDF • compatibility with media players 13 14 Exercises Basics 15 16 Set the Working Space Generate an Image File Linux/Mac: ffmpeg cd ~/Desktop -lavfi mandelbrot -t 10 Windows: -c:v rawvideo cd Desktop -pix_fmt uyvy422 mandelbrot.avi 17 18 Play the Image File Generate a Sound File ffplay ffmpeg mandelbrot.avi -lavfi sine=frequency=440 -t 10 la.wav 19 20 Play the Sound File ffplay la.wav 311 Hz 415 Hz 370 Hz 277 Hz 466 Hz 330 Hz 523 Hz 349 Hz 392 Hz 440 Hz 494 Hz 294 Hz 262 Hz 21 22 Merge Image and Sound Play the AV File ffmpeg ffplay -i mandelbrot.avi mandela.avi -i la.wav -c:v copy mandela.avi 23 24 Extract the Metadata Container ffprobe ffprobe mandela.avi -show_format mandela.avi 25 26 Codec Container and Codec ffprobe ffprobe -show_streams -show_format mandela.avi -show_streams mandela.avi 27 28 Format the Output Save the Metadata ffprobe ffprobe -show_format -show_format -show_streams -show_streams -print_format json -print_format json mandela.avi mandela.avi > mandela.txt 29 30 Find Help ffmpeg -h ffmpeg -codecs ffmpeg -decoders ffmpeg -h decoder=aac Transformations ffmpeg -encoders ffmpeg -h encoder=libx264 ffmpeg -filters ffmpeg -pix_fmts 31 32 Modify the Container MD5 Checksums (1) ffmpeg ffmpeg -i mandelbrot.avi -i mandelbrot.avi -c copy -f framemd5 mandelbrot.mov mandelbrot_avi_framemd5.txt 33 34 MD5 Checksums (2) Compare the Checksums ffmpeg Linux/Mac: -i mandelbrot.mov diff -s -f framemd5 mandelbrot_avi_framemd5.txt mandelbrot_mov_framemd5.txt mandelbrot_mov_framemd5.txt Windows: fc mandelbrot_avi_framemd5.txt mandelbrot_mov_framemd5.txt 35 36 Play Single Images ffplay -loop 0 Master to Access DUFAY_TIFF/Dufay_%06d.tif 37 38 File Transformations • from the master file to a mezzanine file • from the master file to an access file • from the mezzanine file to an access file 39 40 Video Exemple Is the Quality the Same? master file ➔ mezzanine file ➔ access file QuickTime demultiplex master file ➔ access file ProRes 422 HQ decode yuv422p10le filter yuv420p H.264 encode multiplex MP4 41 42 Master –> Mezzanine ProRes 422 and ProRes 4444 ffmpeg • QuickTime (.mov) -f image2 -framerate 24 Matroska (.mkv) -i DUFAY_TIFF/Dufay_%06d.tif • MXF = Material eXchange Format (.mxl) -filter:v • "scale=1440:1080:flags=lanczos, pad=1920:1080:240:0" -c:v prores_ks -profile:v 3 Dufay_ProRes.mkv 43 44 Master –> Access Mezzanine –> Access ffmpeg ffmpeg -f image2 -framerate 24 -i Dufay_ProRes.mkv -i DUFAY_TIFF/Dufay_%06d.tif -pix_fmt yuv420p -filter:v -c:v libx264 -preset veryslow -crf 30 "scale=1440:1080:flags=lanczos, Dufay_2_H264.mp4 pad=1920:1080:240:0" -pix_fmt yuv420p -c:v libx264 -preset veryslow -crf 30 Dufay_1_H264.mp4 45 46 Quality control Split screen • difference file ffmpeg split screen -i Dufay_1_H264.mp4 • -i Dufay_2_H264.mp4 -filter_complex "[0]crop=iw/2:ih:0:0[left]; [1]crop=iw/2:ih:iw/2:0[right]; [left][right]hstack" Dufay_H264_split.mp4 47 48 Difference file AV Preservation by reto.ch ffmpeg zone industrielle Le Trési 3 -i Dufay_1_H264.mp4 1028 Préverenges -i Dufay_2_H264.mp4 Switzerland -filter_complex "[1]format=yuva444p, Web: reto.ch lut=c3=128, Twitter: @retoch negate[1_with_alpha]; Email: [email protected] [0][1_with_alpha]overlay" Dufay_H264_delta.mp4 49 50.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'DIY' Digital Preservation for Audio Identify · Appraise · Organise · Preserve · Access Plan + Housekeeping
    'DIY' Digital Preservation for Audio Identify · Appraise · Organise · Preserve · Access Plan + housekeeping Part 1 (10:00am-10:50am) Part 2 (11:00am-11:45am) 10:00am-10:10am Intros and housekeeping 10:50am-11:00am [10-minute comfort break] 10:10am-10:30am Digital Preservation for audio 11:00am-11:15am Organise (Migrate) What material do you care 11:15am-11:45am Store, Maintain, Access about and hope to keep?_ Discussion & Questions 10:30am-10:50am Locate, Appraise, Identify What kind of files are you working with?_ Feel free to Using Zoom swap to ‘Grid View’ when slides are not in use, to gage ‘the room’. Please use the chat Please keep function to your mic on ask questions ‘mute’ when while slides not speaking. are in use. Who are we? • Bridging the Digital Gap traineeship scheme • UK National Archives (National Lottery Heritage Fund) • bringing ‘digital’ skills into the archives sector Why are we doing these workshops? • agitate the cultural record to reflect lived experience • embrace tools that support historical self-determination among non- specialists • raise awareness, share skills, share knowledge What is digital preservation? • digital material is vulnerable in different ways to analog material • digital preservation = “a series of managed activities undertaken to ensure continued access to digital materials for as long as necessary.” Audio practices and technological dependency Image credit: Tarje Sælen Lavik Image credit: Don Shall Image credit: Mk2010 Image credit: Stahlkocher Image credit: JuneAugust Digital preservation and ‘born-digital’ audio Bitstream File(s) Digital Content Rendered Content • codecs (e.g. LPCM) • formats and containers (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Speech Recognition Work on the Web Christopher J. Varenhorst
    Making Speech Recognition Work on the Web by Christopher J. Varenhorst Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Engineering in Computer Science and Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2011 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011. All rights reserved. Author.................................................................... Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science May 20, 2011 Certified by . James R. Glass Principal Research Scientist Thesis Supervisor Certified by . Scott Cyphers Research Scientist Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Christopher J. Terman Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students Making Speech Recognition Work on the Web by Christopher J. Varenhorst Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on May 20, 2011, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Engineering in Computer Science and Engineering Abstract We present an improved Audio Controller for Web-Accessible Multimodal Interface toolkit { a system that provides a simple way for developers to add speech recognition to web pages. Our improved system offers increased usability and performance for users and greater flexibility for developers. Tests performed showed a %36 increase in recognition response time in the best possible networking conditions. Preliminary tests shows a markedly improved users experience. The new Wowza platform also provides a means of upgrading other Audio Controllers easily. Thesis Supervisor: James R. Glass Title: Principal Research Scientist Thesis Supervisor: Scott Cyphers Title: Research Scientist 2 Contents 1 Introduction and Background 7 1.1 WAMI - Web Accessible Multimodal Toolkit . 8 1.1.1 Existing Java applet . 11 1.2 SALT .
    [Show full text]
  • A Forensic Database for Digital Audio, Video, and Image Media
    THE “DENVER MULTIMEDIA DATABASE”: A FORENSIC DATABASE FOR DIGITAL AUDIO, VIDEO, AND IMAGE MEDIA by CRAIG ANDREW JANSON B.A., University of Richmond, 1997 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado Denver in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Recording Arts Program 2019 This thesis for the Master of Science degree by Craig Andrew Janson has been approved for the Recording Arts Program by Catalin Grigoras, Chair Jeff M. Smith Cole Whitecotton Date: May 18, 2019 ii Janson, Craig Andrew (M.S., Recording Arts Program) The “Denver Multimedia Database”: A Forensic Database for Digital Audio, Video, and Image Media Thesis directed by Associate Professor Catalin Grigoras ABSTRACT To date, there have been multiple databases developed for use in many forensic disciplines. There are very large and well-known databases like CODIS (DNA), IAFIS (fingerprints), and IBIS (ballistics). There are databases for paint, shoeprint, glass, and even ink; all of which catalog and maintain information on all the variations of their specific subject matter. Somewhat recently there was introduced the “Dresden Image Database” which is designed to provide a digital image database for forensic study and contains images that are generic in nature, royalty free, and created specifically for this database. However, a central repository is needed for the collection and study of digital audios, videos, and images. This kind of database would permit researchers, students, and investigators to explore the data from various media and various sources, compare an unknown with knowns with the possibility of discovering the likely source of the unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Ffmpeg Documentation Table of Contents
    ffmpeg Documentation Table of Contents 1 Synopsis 2 Description 3 Detailed description 3.1 Filtering 3.1.1 Simple filtergraphs 3.1.2 Complex filtergraphs 3.2 Stream copy 4 Stream selection 5 Options 5.1 Stream specifiers 5.2 Generic options 5.3 AVOptions 5.4 Main options 5.5 Video Options 5.6 Advanced Video options 5.7 Audio Options 5.8 Advanced Audio options 5.9 Subtitle options 5.10 Advanced Subtitle options 5.11 Advanced options 5.12 Preset files 6 Tips 7 Examples 7.1 Preset files 7.2 Video and Audio grabbing 7.3 X11 grabbing 7.4 Video and Audio file format conversion 8 Syntax 8.1 Quoting and escaping 8.1.1 Examples 8.2 Date 8.3 Time duration 8.3.1 Examples 8.4 Video size 8.5 Video rate 8.6 Ratio 8.7 Color 8.8 Channel Layout 9 Expression Evaluation 10 OpenCL Options 11 Codec Options 12 Decoders 13 Video Decoders 13.1 rawvideo 13.1.1 Options 14 Audio Decoders 14.1 ac3 14.1.1 AC-3 Decoder Options 14.2 ffwavesynth 14.3 libcelt 14.4 libgsm 14.5 libilbc 14.5.1 Options 14.6 libopencore-amrnb 14.7 libopencore-amrwb 14.8 libopus 15 Subtitles Decoders 15.1 dvdsub 15.1.1 Options 15.2 libzvbi-teletext 15.2.1 Options 16 Encoders 17 Audio Encoders 17.1 aac 17.1.1 Options 17.2 ac3 and ac3_fixed 17.2.1 AC-3 Metadata 17.2.1.1 Metadata Control Options 17.2.1.2 Downmix Levels 17.2.1.3 Audio Production Information 17.2.1.4 Other Metadata Options 17.2.2 Extended Bitstream Information 17.2.2.1 Extended Bitstream Information - Part 1 17.2.2.2 Extended Bitstream Information - Part 2 17.2.3 Other AC-3 Encoding Options 17.2.4 Floating-Point-Only AC-3 Encoding
    [Show full text]
  • © 2019 Jimi Jones
    © 2019 Jimi Jones SO MANY STANDARDS, SO LITTLE TIME: A HISTORY AND ANALYSIS OF FOUR DIGITAL VIDEO STANDARDS BY JIMI JONES DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Library and Information Science in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2019 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Jerome McDonough, Chair Associate Professor Lori Kendall Assistant Professor Peter Darch Professor Howard Besser, New York University ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on standards for digital video - the social aspects of their design and the sociotechnical forces that drive their development and adoption. This work is a history and analysis of how the MXF, JPEG 2000, FFV1 and Matroska standards have been adopted and/or adapted by libraries and archives of different sizes. Well-funded institutions often have the resources to develop tailor-made specifications for the digitization of their analog video objects. Digital video standards and specifications of this kind are often derived from the needs of the cinema production and television broadcast realms in the United States and may be unsuitable for smaller memory institutions that are resource-poor and/or lack staff with the knowledge to implement these technologies. This research seeks to provide insight into how moving image preservation professionals work with - and sometimes against - broadcast and film production industries in order to produce and/or implement standards governing video formats and encodings. This dissertation describes the transition of four digital video standards from niches to widespread use in libraries and archives. It also examines the effects these standards produce on cultural heritage video preservation by interviewing people who implement the standards as well as people who develop them.
    [Show full text]
  • (A/V Codecs) REDCODE RAW (.R3D) ARRIRAW
    What is a Codec? Codec is a portmanteau of either "Compressor-Decompressor" or "Coder-Decoder," which describes a device or program capable of performing transformations on a data stream or signal. Codecs encode a stream or signal for transmission, storage or encryption and decode it for viewing or editing. Codecs are often used in videoconferencing and streaming media solutions. A video codec converts analog video signals from a video camera into digital signals for transmission. It then converts the digital signals back to analog for display. An audio codec converts analog audio signals from a microphone into digital signals for transmission. It then converts the digital signals back to analog for playing. The raw encoded form of audio and video data is often called essence, to distinguish it from the metadata information that together make up the information content of the stream and any "wrapper" data that is then added to aid access to or improve the robustness of the stream. Most codecs are lossy, in order to get a reasonably small file size. There are lossless codecs as well, but for most purposes the almost imperceptible increase in quality is not worth the considerable increase in data size. The main exception is if the data will undergo more processing in the future, in which case the repeated lossy encoding would damage the eventual quality too much. Many multimedia data streams need to contain both audio and video data, and often some form of metadata that permits synchronization of the audio and video. Each of these three streams may be handled by different programs, processes, or hardware; but for the multimedia data stream to be useful in stored or transmitted form, they must be encapsulated together in a container format.
    [Show full text]
  • Ease Your Automation, Improve Your Audio, with Ffmpeg
    Ease your automation, improve your audio, with FFmpeg A talk by John Warburton, freelance newscaster for the More Radio network, lecturer in the Department of Music and Media in the University of Surrey, Guildford, England Ease your automation, improve your audio, with FFmpeg A talk by John Warburton, who doesn’t have a camera on this machine. My use of Liquidsoap I used it to develop a highly convenient, automated system suitable for in-store radio, sustaining services without time constraints, and targeted music and news services. It’s separate from my professional newscasting job, except I leave it playing when editing my professional on-air bulletins, to keep across world, UK and USA news, and for calming music. In this way, it’s incredibly useful, professionally, right now! What is FFmpeg? It’s not: • “a command line program” • “a tool for pirating” • “a hacker’s plaything” (that’s what they said about GNU/Linux once!) • “out of date” • “full of patent problems” It asks for: • Some technical knowledge of audio-visual containers and codec • Some understanding of what makes up picture and sound files and multiplexes What is FFmpeg? It is: • a world-leading multimedia manipulation framework • a gateway to codecs, filters, multiplexors, demultiplexors, and measuring tools • exceedingly generous at accepting many flavours of audio-visual input • aims to achieve standards-compliant output, and often succeeds • gives the user both library-accessed and command-line-accessed toolkits • is generally among the fastest of its type • incorporates many industry-leading tools • is programmer-friendly • is cross-platform • is open source, by most measures of the term • is at the heart of many broadcast conversion, and signal manipulation systems • is a viable Internet transmission platform Integration with Liquidsoap? (1.4.3) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Video Player for Pc 10 Best and Free Video Players for Windows 10 PC in 2021
    download video player for pc 10 Best And Free Video Players For Windows 10 PC in 2021. We all love to watch TV shows, Movies on our computers. Since computers are more preferred nowadays, more and more streaming sites are popping out of the web. However, not everyone out there loves to stream videos because video streaming can be expensive. We first need to have a proper internet connection and a subscription to the streaming service to watch videos. In this case, downloading videos seems to be the best option as we have to spend the internet data once rather than streaming it again and again. But, what after downloading the video? Is it enough to get the best media experience? Well, no! To get the best video experience, we need to use the best media player. The media player is the only thing that decides our media consumption experience. So, having a good media player app is the most vital thing for media consumption. In this article, we will share the list of the best free video players for Windows. List of 10 Best And Free Video Players For Windows 10. These video players are free to download, and you can use them to get the most amazing video watching experience. So, let’s explore the ten best free video players for Windows. 1. Media Player Classic. If you are searching for a powerful video player tool for Windows 10 operating system, you need to give Media Player Classic a try. Guess what? The tool provides users with lots of customization options.
    [Show full text]
  • Opus, a Free, High-Quality Speech and Audio Codec
    Opus, a free, high-quality speech and audio codec Jean-Marc Valin, Koen Vos, Timothy B. Terriberry, Gregory Maxwell 29 January 2014 Xiph.Org & Mozilla What is Opus? ● New highly-flexible speech and audio codec – Works for most audio applications ● Completely free – Royalty-free licensing – Open-source implementation ● IETF RFC 6716 (Sep. 2012) Xiph.Org & Mozilla Why a New Audio Codec? http://xkcd.com/927/ http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards.png Xiph.Org & Mozilla Why Should You Care? ● Best-in-class performance within a wide range of bitrates and applications ● Adaptability to varying network conditions ● Will be deployed as part of WebRTC ● No licensing costs ● No incompatible flavours Xiph.Org & Mozilla History ● Jan. 2007: SILK project started at Skype ● Nov. 2007: CELT project started ● Mar. 2009: Skype asks IETF to create a WG ● Feb. 2010: WG created ● Jul. 2010: First prototype of SILK+CELT codec ● Dec 2011: Opus surpasses Vorbis and AAC ● Sep. 2012: Opus becomes RFC 6716 ● Dec. 2013: Version 1.1 of libopus released Xiph.Org & Mozilla Applications and Standards (2010) Application Codec VoIP with PSTN AMR-NB Wideband VoIP/videoconference AMR-WB High-quality videoconference G.719 Low-bitrate music streaming HE-AAC High-quality music streaming AAC-LC Low-delay broadcast AAC-ELD Network music performance Xiph.Org & Mozilla Applications and Standards (2013) Application Codec VoIP with PSTN Opus Wideband VoIP/videoconference Opus High-quality videoconference Opus Low-bitrate music streaming Opus High-quality music streaming Opus Low-delay
    [Show full text]
  • Codec Is a Portmanteau of Either
    What is a Codec? Codec is a portmanteau of either "Compressor-Decompressor" or "Coder-Decoder," which describes a device or program capable of performing transformations on a data stream or signal. Codecs encode a stream or signal for transmission, storage or encryption and decode it for viewing or editing. Codecs are often used in videoconferencing and streaming media solutions. A video codec converts analog video signals from a video camera into digital signals for transmission. It then converts the digital signals back to analog for display. An audio codec converts analog audio signals from a microphone into digital signals for transmission. It then converts the digital signals back to analog for playing. The raw encoded form of audio and video data is often called essence, to distinguish it from the metadata information that together make up the information content of the stream and any "wrapper" data that is then added to aid access to or improve the robustness of the stream. Most codecs are lossy, in order to get a reasonably small file size. There are lossless codecs as well, but for most purposes the almost imperceptible increase in quality is not worth the considerable increase in data size. The main exception is if the data will undergo more processing in the future, in which case the repeated lossy encoding would damage the eventual quality too much. Many multimedia data streams need to contain both audio and video data, and often some form of metadata that permits synchronization of the audio and video. Each of these three streams may be handled by different programs, processes, or hardware; but for the multimedia data stream to be useful in stored or transmitted form, they must be encapsulated together in a container format.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended File Formats for Long-Term Archiving and for Web Dissemination in Phaidra
    Recommended file formats for long-term archiving and for web dissemination in Phaidra Edited by Gianluca Drago May 2019 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Premise This document is intended to provide an overview of the file formats to be used depending on two possible destinations of the digital document: long-term archiving uploading to Phaidra and subsequent web dissemination When the document uploaded to Phaidra is also the only saved file, the two destinations end up coinciding, but in general one will probably want to produce two different files, in two different formats, so as to meet the differences in requirements and use in the final destinations. In the following tables, the recommendations for long-term archiving are distinct from those for dissemination in Phaidra. There are no absolute criteria for choosing the file format. The choice is always dependent on different evaluations that the person who is carrying out the archiving will have to make on a case by case basis and will often result in a compromise between the best achievable quality and the limits imposed by the costs of production, processing and storage of files, as well as, for the preceding, by the opportunity of a conversion to a new format. 1 This choice is particularly significant from the perspective of long-term archiving, for which a quality that respects the authenticity and integrity of the original document and a format that guarantees long-term access to data are desirable. This document should be seen more as an aid to the reasoned choice of the person carrying out the archiving than as a list of guidelines to be followed to the letter.
    [Show full text]
  • FFV1 Video Codec Specification
    FFV1 Video Codec Specification by Michael Niedermayer [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Terms and Definitions 2 2.1 Terms ................................................. 2 2.2 Definitions ............................................... 2 3 Conventions 3 3.1 Arithmetic operators ......................................... 3 3.2 Assignment operators ........................................ 3 3.3 Comparison operators ........................................ 3 3.4 Order of operation precedence .................................... 4 3.5 Range ................................................. 4 3.6 Bitstream functions .......................................... 4 4 General Description 5 4.1 Border ................................................. 5 4.2 Median predictor ........................................... 5 4.3 Context ................................................ 5 4.4 Quantization ............................................. 5 4.5 Colorspace ............................................... 6 4.5.1 JPEG2000-RCT ....................................... 6 4.6 Coding of the sample difference ................................... 6 4.6.1 Range coding mode ..................................... 6 4.6.2 Huffman coding mode .................................... 9 5 Bitstream 10 5.1 Configuration Record ......................................... 10 5.1.1 In AVI File Format ...................................... 11 5.1.2 In ISO/IEC 14496-12 (MP4 File Format) ......................... 11 5.1.3 In NUT File Format ....................................
    [Show full text]