The Evolution of Double-Entry Bookkeeping
The Evolution of Double-Entry Bookkeeping by Sudipta Basu (Temple University) and Gregory Waymire (Emory University and Chapman University) September 7, 2020 We thank two anonymous referees, Patty Dechow, Deirdre McCloskey, Karl Schuhmacher, Alan Sangster, Matt Sooy, Shyam Sunder, Daniel Tinkelman, attendees at the Chapman Behavioral Finance Conference, Hawaii Accounting Research Conference and American Accounting Association annual meeting, and workshop/brownbag participants at several universities— Alaska (Economics), Emory, Oklahoma, Southern California, Temple and Yale—for helpful comments and suggestions. The Evolution of Double-Entry Bookkeeping ABSTRACT Double-entry bookkeeping (DEB) slowly displaced single-entry bookkeeping (SEB) over 800 years and is now used by all but the smallest firms. We address three questions about DEB’s evolution: (1) What is the main benefit of DEB? (2) How did DEB emerge and evolve? and (3) Why did individual firms and economies choose DEB over SEB? We hypothesize that DEB better measures the profits from individual transactions. The crucial innovation was the DEBITS=CREDITS constraint, which required an equity account to balance assets and liabilities that led to continuously updated cumulative profits. We argue that DEB improved firms’ survival prospects by enabling more effective discovery of future profit opportunities. We suggest tests of our arguments about how and why DEB improved the functioning of firms and economies. Keywords: double-entry bookkeeping, economic exchange, profit measurement, discovery process JEL Classification: M41, D23, D83, B15 1 “We make constant use of formulas, symbols and rules whose meaning we do not understand and through the use of which we avail ourselves of the assistance of knowledge which individually we do not possess.
[Show full text]