DOCSLIB.ORG

Eagle Rock Aggregates Oakland Terminal Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eagle Rock Aggregates Oakland Terminal Project Port of Oakland Eagle Rock Aggregates Oakland Terminal Project Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report November 2020 Cover: CSL Tacoma, a self-discharging ocean- going vessel entering the San Francisco Bay (having passed the Golden Gate Bridge). Cover image courtesy of CSL Americas. Horizon Water and Environment. 2020. Eagle Rock Aggregates Oakland Terminal Project – Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. (SCH #2001082058). November. (20.008) Oakland, CA. Port of Oakland Eagle Rock Aggregates Oakland Terminal Project Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report SCH #2001082058 Prepared for: Port of Oakland 530 Water Street Oakland, CA 94607 Contact: Khamly Chuop, Associate Environmental Planner Prepared by: Horizon Water and Environment, LLC 266 Grand Avenue, Suite 210 Oakland, CA 94610 Contact: Jeff Thomas, Principal November 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Intended Use of Supplemental EIR ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Background and Context ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3.1 Oakland Army Base Area Redevelopment Plan ..................................................... 1-1 1.3.2 OAB CEQA History .................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.3 OAB Maritime Uses ................................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Purpose of Supplemental EIR .............................................................................................. 1-3 1.5 Scoping Comments and Issues Addressed .......................................................................... 1-5 1.5.1 Scoping ................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.5.2 Summary of Key Scoping Comments ..................................................................... 1-6 1.6 Public Review and Comment .............................................................................................. 1-7 1.7 Content and Organization of this SEIR ................................................................................ 1-8 Chapter 2 Project Description .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Project Need and Objectives ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Project Location and Existing Site Conditions ..................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Existing ERA Operations in the San Francisco Bay Area ...................................................... 2-5 2.3.1 Existing Water Side Operations.............................................................................. 2-5 2.3.2 Existing Land Side Operations .............................................................................. 2-11 2.4 Proposed Project ............................................................................................................... 2-12 2.4.1 Project Duration ................................................................................................... 2-14 2.4.2 Project Onshore Components .............................................................................. 2-14 2.4.3 Offloading Process ............................................................................................... 2-32 2.4.4 Material Storage .................................................................................................. 2-32 2.4.5 Material Transport ............................................................................................... 2-32 2.4.6 Operational Workforce and Equipment............................................................... 2-33 2.4.7 Project Site Maintenance ..................................................................................... 2-34 2.4.8 Potential Future Use of Berths 20 and 21 ............................................................ 2-35 2.5 Project Construction ......................................................................................................... 2-35 2.5.1 Schedule ............................................................................................................... 2-35 2.5.2 Demolition ............................................................................................................ 2-35 2.5.3 Site Preparation and Grading ............................................................................... 2-35 2.5.4 Construction of Project Components ................................................................... 2-36 2.5.5 Paving ................................................................................................................... 2-36 2.5.6 Stormwater Management During Construction .................................................. 2-36 2.5.7 Construction Workforce and Equipment ............................................................. 2-36 2.5.8 Water Use ............................................................................................................ 2-37 Eagle Rock Aggregates Oakland Terminal Project November 2020 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report i Port of Oakland Table of Contents 2.5.9 Energy Use ........................................................................................................... 2-38 2.5.10 Materials and Construction Waste Management ................................................ 2-38 2.6 End-of-Lease Site Restoration ........................................................................................... 2-38 2.7 Required Approvals ........................................................................................................... 2-39 Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis ................................................................................................ 2.7-1 3.1 Introduction to Environmental Analysis .......................................................................... 3.1-1 3.1.1 Baseline Environmental Conditions .................................................................... 3.1-1 3.1.2 Significance of Environmental Impacts ............................................................... 3.1-2 3.2 Environmental Topics Adequately Addressed in the 2002 EIR as Addended .................. 3.2-2 3.2.1 Agriculture ........................................................................................................... 3.2-2 3.2.2 Biological Resources ............................................................................................ 3.2-2 3.2.3 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................. 3.2-3 3.2.4 Mineral Resources............................................................................................... 3.2-5 3.2.5 Population/Housing ............................................................................................ 3.2-5 3.2.6 Public Services ..................................................................................................... 3.2-5 3.2.7 Recreation ........................................................................................................... 3.2-6 3.3 Aesthetics ......................................................................................................................... 3.3-1 3.3.1 Update to Regulatory and Environmental Setting .............................................. 3.3-1 3.3.2 Summary of Prior Analysis .................................................................................. 3.3-3 3.3.3 Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 3.3-4 3.4 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................ 3.4-1 3.4.1 Update to Regulatory and Environmental Setting .............................................. 3.4-1 3.4.2 Summary of Prior Analysis ................................................................................ 3.4-10 3.4.3 Supplemental Analyses Related to the Proposed Project ................................ 3.4-12 3.4.4 Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 3.4-12 3.5 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................. 3.5-1 3.5.1 Update to Regulatory and Environmental Setting .............................................. 3.5-1 3.5.2 Summary of Prior Analysis .................................................................................. 3.5-2 3.5.3 Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 3.5-6 3.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .............................................................................................. 3.6-1 3.6.1 Update to Regulatory and Environmental Setting .............................................. 3.6-1 3.6.2 Summary of Prior Analysis .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assistant City Administrator
    Assistant City Administrator OAKLAND AN EXCITING LEADERSHIP OPPORTUNITY The Assistant City Administrator position for the City of Oakland, California, is a prime opportunity for an innovative leader who is a proven municipal executive with strong general management expertise and a management style that is adaptive in this large, complex organization. The City of Oakland is embarking on transformative initiatives to ensure a resilient and sustainable government, balancing the influx of development with the need to preserve Oakland’s unique culture and diversity. The Assistant City Administrator will be a forward-thinking problem-solver committed to values of transparent communications, collaboration, racial equity and inclusion. The successful candidate will join a top-notch executive leadership team committed to providing excellent services to the entire Oakland community. THE CITY OF OAKLAND – VIBRANT, DIVERSE, AND Kaiser Permanente, Pandora, Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream, and THE PLACE TO BE Revolution Foods. Many of these corporations are in close The City of Oakland is dynamic with 50 distinct and eclectic proximity to new businesses and various small retail shops that neighborhoods, 17 commercial districts, an increasingly have sprung up in the downtown area. High quality educational vibrant downtown, a strong economic base, world-class arts opportunities abound as six major universities, including U.C. and entertainment venues, superior cultural and recreational Berkeley, are within a 40-mile radius. amenities, and a rich multicultural heritage. Oakland is the eighth largest city in California with an estimated population Oakland is enjoying the region’s economic boom, which has of 420,005 (2016 U.S. Census Bureau). The city serves as spurred increased investment, development and building.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ferries to Hornblower Cruises
    Getting Out on San Francisco Bay: From Ferries to Hornblower Cruises Author’s Note: This article “Getting Out on San Francisco Bay: From Ferries to Hornblower Cruises ” is a stand-alone article on my website. Further parallel articles on the Bay include chapters in my two main travel guidebooks/ebooks on California. They are Northern California History Travel Adventures: 35 Suggested Trips and Northern California Travel: The Best Options. All my travel guidebooks/ebooks on California can be seen on my Amazon Author Page. By Lee Foster Getting out on San Francisco Bay in a boat of some kind is a concept I recommend to all visitors and locals. San Francisco Bay is such an inviting body of water, especially if your boat trip takes you across the Bay or out beyond the Golden Gate Bridge. From a boat you can see the Bridges, especially the Bay Bridge and the Golden Gate Bridge, plus the skyline profile of the city of San Francisco. You can see the lovely green Marin hillsides and the profiles of the main Bay islands, such as Alcatraz and Angel Islands. The protected Bay waters are usually not too rough. Sometime you will encounter wildlife, such as sea lions and migrating birds. Occasionally, you may pass close to the immense container ships that come through the Golden Gate into the port of Oakland. Their cargo will likely come from China and Korea. The Ferry Option for San Francisco Bay The excursion boat California Hornblower ready to depart on San Francisco Bay There are many ways to get out on San Francisco Bay in a boat, and I have done most of them at one time or another.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland Coliseum Industrial Center 5800 Coliseum Way | Oakland, CA
    Premier Urban Logistics Location Oakland Coliseum Industrial Center 5800 Coliseum Way | Oakland, CA ±336,680 SF Warehouse For Lease Jason Ovadia Patrick Metzger Greg Matter Jason Cranston Robert Bisnette +1 510 285 5360 +1 510 285 5362 650 480 2220 [email protected] +1 510 661 4011 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] +1 650 480 2100 [email protected] Lic # 01742912 Lic # 01888895 Lic #01380731 Lic # 01253892 Lic # 01474433 Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. Real Estate License # 01856260 Unrivaled Access to Bay80 Area Urban Core 80 Vallejo Port of Benecia 80 Concord San Rafael Richmond Port of 101 Richmond 580 Walnut Creek Oakland 680 Port of Oakland Prologis Oakland Coliseum San Francisco Urban Logistics Center Port of San Francisco Oakland International Airport PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Hayward 580 Pleasanton San Francisco • Close proximity to Oakland Airport and International Airport Port of Oakland Fremont • Overweight accessible location San Mateo 880 • Great access to robust workforce 280 101 • Union Pacific Rail capabilities Driving distance Palo Alto • Heavy Power with Back Up Generator 3.5 mi Oakland International Airport 680 5.3 mi Port of Oakland San Jose • Divisible to ±168,340 SF International Airport • Available Q4 2020 16.2 mi SF Financial District San Jose 16.2 mi Port of San Francisco 27.5 mi SF International Airport 36.4 mi San Jose International Airport ±336,680 SF Current Building Configuration 80 Warehouse ±336,680 SF Office ±16,380 SF Site Size 9.93 acres Vallejo Column
    [Show full text]
  • PORT of OAKLAN D Executive Director FRANK KIANG BOARD of PORT COMMISSIONERS DAVID L
    JOHN PROTOPAPPAS TAY YOSHITANI President PORT OF OAKLAND Executive Director PATRICIA A. SCATES BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS DAVID L. ALEXANDER First Vice President 530 Water Street • Oakland, California 94607 Port Attorney KENNETH S. KATZOFF JOHN T. BETTERTON Second Vice President Telephone: (510) 627-1100 Secretary of the Board Facsimile: (510) 763.3562 DARLENE AYERS-JOHNSON TDD: (510) 763.5730 Commissioner ANTHONY A. BATARSE, JR. E-Mail: [email protected] Commissioner WEB: www.portofoakland.com FRANK KIANG Commissioner DAVID KRAMER MINUTES Commissioner Regular Meeting of the Board of Port Commissioners Tuesday, January 20, 2004 - 3:00 PM ROLL CALL President Protopappas called the meeting to order at 3:08 p.m., and the following Commissioners were in attendance: Commissioners Ayers-Johnson, Commissioner Batarse, Second Vice-President Katzoff, Commissioner Kramer, First Vice-President Scates and President Protopappas. Commissioner Kiang was excused. CLOSED SESSION The Board entered into Closed Session at 3:10 p.m. to consider the following items: 1. Conference With Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: (1 Matter) 2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation. Pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9. Names of Cases: Socorro Salizar v. Port of Oakland, Workers Compensation Appeals Board Case No. OAK 0280204. REGULAR MEETING January 20, 2004 3. Conference With Real Property Negotiator. Government Code Section 54956.8. Property: Oakland Army Base Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland, Oakland Base Reuse Authority, Oakland Redevelopment Agency and City Council Agency Negotiator: Executive Director Tay Yoshitani Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment OPEN SESSION President Protopappas reconvened the Board in Open Session at 4:11 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Oakland Maritime Facilities
    Port of Oakland Maritime Facilities 0 1/2 1 nautical mile 80 Berths Terminal Union Pacific Tides in San Francisco Bay BNSF Railway N MAGNETIC Railroad San Francisco Bay Area 80 0 1/2 1 mile Mean Mean Mean 14° 11' 20–26 Ports America high low range Sacramento 0 1/2 1 kilometer +5.6 ft -1.3 ft +6.9 ft E Outer Harbor Terminal +1.7m -0.4m +1.3m N 505 50 Operator: Ports America W 580 Santa Rosa Terminal Gates / Berth Numbers 101 Carriers Petaluma UPRR CCNI Maersk S Napa r ive o R Hamburg Süd MSC nt Major Warehouse / Transload Facility Faireld e m ra Hapag-Lloyd Polynesia c 37 80 a S City Development Area Horizon Yang Ming 32nd St. K-Line 80 Vallejo 5 Trade and Logistics Complex San Rafael Richmond 30–32 TraPac Terminal 80 99 Public Truck Scales 101 Operator: TraPac Inc. Concord Carriers Permitted Heavy Weight Container Routes BNSF Toll Plaza BNSF MOL Hyundai For info visit www.portofoakland.com (westbound only) 24 Intermodal San Francisco Facility APL Northport City Truck Telegraph Av. Freeways City Parking San Oakland Stockton Beach Development Francisco Port of 580 UPRR Bay Oakland 680 UPRR 35–38 Ben E. Nutter Terminal Intermodal Rail Facilities Area Alaska St. PCC Logistics SF Int’l Int’l Airport Intermodal OT411 Facility AMNAV Maritime Africa St. West Grand Av. Oakland Airport (OAK) Crowley 808 Operator: Seaside Transportation Corregidor Av. (SFO) Tug Services Tug Service Bataan Av. UPRR 580 Lathrop Services (STS)/Evergreen Burma Rd. S Container Cranes (Port Owned) UPRR a 9 807 n J o 8 Buna St.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge Accepted
    SUMMER 2018 Challenge Accepted THE KATAYANAGI FAMILY AND THOUSanDS OF OTHER PARK VISitORS MARK THE 25TH anniVERSARY OF THE TRaiLS CHALLEngE IN THIS ISSUE: TILDen FOREVER P. 4 | intO the REDWOODS P. 12 | A PLAnneD SHORELine PARK P. 16 DID YOU ON THE RIGHT TRACK This year marks a milestone time for the Park District KNOW? Fun facts about the with the 25th anniversary of the Trails Challenge and East Bay Regional park membership at an all-time high. The vital role our Park District parks play in keeping the East Bay happy, healthy and active is clearer than ever. Park visitors of all ages can take part in the annual Trails Challenge—finding new paths to hike and parks to explore. A few years ago, the Foundation heard from two senior women who had been walking together at Lake Chabot for decades. After taking the challenge, one of the women shared: “I get to see new places, clear my head and get healthy. I feel great about it.” The Trails Challenge had a similar impact on our cover subjects: Jonathan, Donica, Penny and Rocky Katayanagi. Jonathan and his daughter, Penny, took on the 2017 Trails Challenge when Penny was 6, completing all five trails in one day. Now, the challenge is a family tradition, with all $192,839 four of them hitting the trails together—and fostering a lifelong love Total amount of bequests given to of hiking. the Foundation in 2017 Inspiring people to be active and enjoy our beautiful regional parks is one of the best parts of the Trails Challenge, and it’s why the program continues to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of San Francisco Maritime Cargo and Warehouse Market Analysis
    PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME CARGO AND WAREHOUSE MARKET ANALYSIS January 5, 2009 FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Port of San Francisco Prepared by: CBRE Consulting, Inc. Martin Associates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 3 II. ASSESSEMENT OF EXISTING MARKETS............................................................................ 4 1 HISTORIC MARINE CARGO ACTIVITY AT WEST COAST PORTS............................................ 4 2 ASSESSMENT OF COMPETING BAY AREA PORTS ................................................................... 6 2.1 Port of Redwood City ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Port of Richmond .............................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Port of Stockton ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Port of Sacramento........................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Port of Benicia................................................................................................................................... 8 3 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland Army Base Oral History Project
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Peter Lew: Oakland Army Base Oral History Project Interviews conducted by Robin Li in 2008 Copyright © 2008 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Peter Lew, dated July 10, 2008. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Port Commissioners City of Oakland
    BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS CITY OF OAKLAND RESOLUTION NO. 05079 RESOLUTION ADOPTING POLICY FOR AWARDING CONCESSION AND CUSTOMER SERVICE PRIVILEGES IN THE TERMINAL BUILDINGS AT OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. RESOLVED that the Board of Port Commissioners hereby finds and determines it is in the best interest of the Port to adopt the Policy For Awarding Concession and Customer Service Privileges in the Terminal Buildings at Oakland International Airport, as described in Agenda Report Item A-3 dated March 15, 2005. At the regular meeting held on March 15, 2005 Passed by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Ayers-Johnson, Batarse, Katzoff, Kiang, Kramer, Protopappas and President Scates – 7 Noes: None Absent: None 67066.v1 POLICY FOR AWARDING CONCESSION AND CUSTOMER SERVICE PRIVILEGES IN THE TERMINAL BUILDINGS AT OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA PORT OF OAKLAND Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. OVERALL POLICY FOR AWARDING CONCESSION AND CUSTOMER SERVICE PRIVILEGES 2 A. Public Notice 2 B. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises C. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND SMALL Local business utilization Policy 3 D. LIVING WAGE AND LABOR STANDARDS POLICY 3 E. Qualifications of Prospective Bidders or Proposers 3 F. Alternative Method of Awarding Concession and Customer Service Privileges 4 G. General Financial Basis for Proposals 7 H. Preproposal and Prebid Conferences 7 I. Local Outreach Meetings 8 J. Formal Submission of Bids or Proposals 8 III. POLICY OUTLINE - INDIVIDUAL CONCESSION AND CUSTOMER SERVICE PRIVILEGES 10 I. INTRODUCTION The Board of Port Commissioners ("Board") of the Port of Oakland ("Port") adopts this concession policy (the "Concession Policy") to govern the awarding of concession and customer service privileges in and adjacent to the Terminal Buildings at the Oakland International Airport ("the Airport").
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Gordon Coleman: Oakland Army Base Oral History Project Interviews conducted by Lisa Rubens in 2007 Copyright © 2008 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Gordon Coleman date August 1, 2008. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Redeveloping Oakland
    WHAT’S INSIDE FALL 2009 / ISSUE 3 / VOL 3 NON-PROFITS HELP BUIld ‘modEL CITy’ Pages 2-8, 10 THANKS FOR YOUR FEEDBACK! Page 5 HOLIDAYS IN OAKLAND Page 7 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR Page 9 FOOT PATROLS CUT CRIME BY HALF Page 10 ARMY BASE DEVELOPER CHOSEN Page 11 WANTED: A FEW REDEVELOPING GOOD DEVELOPERS Page 12 CHECK OUT THE OPPORTUNITIES IN OAKLAND OAKLAND REASSESS / REEVALUATE / REBUILD / REVITALIZE Page 12 NON-profits help build ‘Model City’ ationwide, governments from the municipal level to the federal level are facing huge challenges: rebuilding the economy following the financial crisis and collapse of the housing market, improving our infrastructure and reversing global warming. Oakland is not immune to these challenges, but the City has spent more than two years Ndeveloping a roadmap for its future: the Model City vision initiated by Mayor Ronald V. Dellums and created with the input of more than 800 members throughout the community. THE MODEL CITY HAS THREE KEY GOALS: 1. Healthy Communities, including safe neighborhoods and access to health care at school-based sites; 2. Educational and Cultural Stimulation, with opportunities from preschool through college and job training; 3. Sustainable Economic Development, including job training, in both the growing “green” sector and for residents with barriers to employment, and preservation of land for business and economic development needs. But City officials know that these goals aren’t achievable by government working in a vacuum. They will take the support of the state, the engagement of our diverse community and public-private partnerships. (continued on page 2) s MAYOR DELLUMS’ GREEN JOBS PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS.
    [Show full text]
  • West Oakland TRUCK MANAGEMENT PLAN
    West Oakland TRUCK MANAGEMENT PLAN An action-based plan designed to reduce the effects of transport trucks on local streets in West Oakland A joint plan by the City of Oakland and Port of Oakland May 2019 The West Oakland Truck Management Plan and supporting documentation is available electronically on the City’s website at www.oaklandca.gov/topics/west-oakland-truck-management-plan and on the Port’s website at www.portofoakland.com/community/environmental-stewardship/west-oakland-truck-management-plan/ Translation services for limited English proficient (LEP) persons will be provided upon request; please contact 510-627-1135. Para información en Español, llame al 510-627-1135. 中文聯絡電話 510-627-1135. May 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The West Oakland Truck Management Plan (TMP) is an action-based plan designed to reduce the effects of transport trucks on local streets in West Oakland. When the TMP is implemented, the West Oakland community should experience fewer trucks driving or parking in residential areas. The TMP will improve safety for people walking, biking, and driving in West Oakland. It will reduce the nuisance of trucks driving or parking where they should not. And the TMP will improve the quality of life for people living and working in West Oakland, including a reduction in local- ized diesel emissions. The TMP is the result of a joint planning effort undertaken by the Port of Oakland (Port) and City of Oakland (City) over the past two years with substantial input from the West Oakland residential and business communities. Community input was obtained through a series of stakeholder workshops, as well as one-on-one meet- ings, presentations before community and business associations, and surveys.
    [Show full text]