DOCSLIB.ORG

Des Moines River Upstream Mitigation Study April 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Des Moines River Upstream Mitigation Study April 2020 Des Moines River Upstream Mitigation Study April 2020 IIHR Technical Report No. 533 Prepared by: Antonio Arenas Daniel Gilles Michael Krasowski Nathan Young Larry Weber Iowa Flood Center | IIHR—Hydroscience & Engineering The University of Iowa C. Maxwell Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory Iowa City, Iowa 52242 ii | Des Moines River Upstream Mitigation Study iii Acknowledgements The Iowa Flood Center and IIHR—Hydroscience & Engineering at the University of Iowa would like to thank Des Moines Public Works Department for providing funding for and supporting this work. iv | Des Moines River Upstream Mitigation Study Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ iv List of Figures ....................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ........................................................................................................... x Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1. Literature Review ............................................................................................. 5 a. Hydrologic History of the Des Moines Lobe ............................................................................. 5 b. Impact of climate change on hydrology .................................................................................... 5 c. History of conservation in Iowa ................................................................................................. 7 d. Benefits of conservation practices ............................................................................................. 7 Contour Buffer Strips, Riparian Practices, and Grassed Waterways ....................................... 8 Water and Sediment Control Basins ......................................................................................... 8 Drainage Water Management .................................................................................................... 8 Nutrient Removal Wetlands – Water Quantity ........................................................................ 9 Nutrient Removal Wetlands – Water Quality ........................................................................... 9 Cover Crops .............................................................................................................................. 10 No-Till ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................... 10 e. History of Hydrologic modeling .............................................................................................. 10 f. Modern uses of hydrologic modeling to study flooding ........................................................... 11 g. Comparison of modeling approaches ...................................................................................... 12 h. Conservation siting tools ..........................................................................................................13 i. Summary ....................................................................................................................................13 2. Conditions in the Des Moines River Watershed .............................................. 14 a. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 14 b. Geology and Soils ......................................................................................................................15 c. Topography ............................................................................................................................... 20 d. Land Use/Cover ....................................................................................................................... 21 e. Instrumentation/Data Records ............................................................................................... 23 f. Streamflow Historic Trends ..................................................................................................... 27 g. Floods of Record ...................................................................................................................... 29 h. Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) ....................................................... 32 i. Application of ACPF tools in representative HUC12 watersheds............................................ 33 v 3. Des Moines River Hydrologic Model Development ......................................... 39 a. Attributing the Model .............................................................................................................. 40 Surface ...................................................................................................................................... 40 Subsurface ................................................................................................................................ 41 Forcing Data and Computational Mesh .................................................................................. 41 b. Model Performance Evaluation ............................................................................................... 41 Monthly Water Cycle ................................................................................................................ 44 Annual Maximum Peak Discharge .......................................................................................... 45 Tile Drainage ............................................................................................................................ 46 4. Analysis of Watershed Scenarios .................................................................... 49 a. Increased Precipitation and Index Points ............................................................................... 49 b. Simulations with observed precipitation. 2002-2018. ........................................................... 52 Mitigating the Effects of High Runoff with Increased Infiltration ......................................... 52 Mitigating the Effects of High Runoff with Native Vegetation ............................................. 53 Mitigating the Effects of High Runoff with Cover Crops/Soil Health/No-Till .................... 56 Mitigating the Effects of High Runoff with Distributed Storage ............................................ 59 Mitigating the Effects of High Runoff with Distributed Storage and Increased Infiltration 62 Saylorville Emergency Spillway ............................................................................................... 64 c. Simulations with increased precipitation (IP) ........................................................................ 65 5. Summary and Conclusions ............................................................................. 67 a. Des Moines River Watershed Water Cycle and Conditions .................................................... 67 b. Des Moines River Watershed Hydrologic Model .................................................................... 67 c. Watershed Scenarios for the Des Moines River Watershed ................................................... 67 Appendix A – Policy and Legal Analysis ................................................................ 72 Appendix B – References ...................................................................................... 87 vi | Des Moines River Upstream Mitigation Study List of Figures Figure 1. The extent of the flooding during the 1993 and 2008 floods (Bradley, 2010). ................ 1 Figure 2. Number of flood-related federally declared disasters in Iowa counties (1988–2016). Data source: https://www.fema.gov/. ....................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3. The number of flood-related federally declared disasters in Iowa (1988–2016). Data source: https://www.fema.gov/. ....................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2.1. The Des Moines River Watershed. The Des Moines River joins the South Raccoon River near Van Meter, Iowa. ..................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 2.2. General soil and geologic characteristics within the Des Moines River Watershed. .. 15 Figure 2.3. Typical Des Moines Lobe cross-section (Prior 1991). .................................................. 16 Figure 2.4. Depth to bedrock in the Des Moines River Watershed. ...............................................17 Figure 2.5. Distribution of Hydrologic Soil Groups in the Des Moines River Watershed. Hydrologic Soil Groups reflect the degree of runoff potential a particular soil has, with Type A representing the lowest runoff potential and Type D representing the highest runoff potential. 19 Figure 2.6. Topography of the Des Moines River Watershed. ....................................................... 20 Figure 2.7. Terrain slopes derived from LiDAR data. .................................................................... 21 Figure 2.8. Land use composition in the Des Moines River Watershed, according to the 2018 Crop Data Layer provided by USDA’s National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journal the Center for Regenerative Practice
    SUMMER 2021 JOURNAL THE CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE PRACTICE Field of the Future New Definition of Nutrient Growing a New Crop SUSAN JENNINGS Density Goes Beyond Labels of Regenerative Farmers DAN KITTREDGE AMY HARPER & KAT CHRISTEN CONTRIBUTORS Matan Mazursky, Educator AGRARIA JOURNAL SUMMER 2021 Gabby Amrhein, Megan Bachman, Beth Bridgeman, Jyoti Miller, Database Coordinator Ariella Brown, Caressa Brown, Kat Christen, Scott Montgomery, Webmaster CONTENTS Sheryl Cunningham, David Diamond, Emily Foubert, Pam Miller, Office Manager Rose Hardesty, Amy Harper, Bob Huston, Rachel Isaacson, Teddy Pierson, Asst. Landuse Coordinator Susan Jennings, Dan Kittredge, Jim Linne, Peggy Nestor, Kaylee Rutherford, Miller Fellow An Invitation to Pay Attention— and Thrive, SHERYL CUNNINGHAM 4 Teddy Pierson, Kenisha Robinson, Rich Sidwell, Kenisha Robinson, Farmer Training Assistant What’s In a Name? Cheryl Smith Xinyuan Shi, Americorps VISTA 5 McKenzie Smith, Miller Fellow Field of the Future, PHOTOGRAPHY SUSAN JENNINGS 6 Mark Thornton, Educator Dennie Eagleson, Amy Harper, Rose Hardesty, New Definition of Nutrient Density Goes Beyond Labels, Tiffany Ward, Educator DAN KITTREDGE 9 Susan Jennings, Teddy Pierson, Renee Wilde Joseph Young, Melrose Acres Grant Coordinator Edible Ethics: To Harvest or Not to Harvest, GABBY LOOMIS-AMRHEIN 12 ILLUSTRATION FARMER PARTNER Natural Foods – Native Edible Plants, BY TEDDY PIERSON Bob Huston 14 Jason Ward Black Farming and Beyond, ARIELLA J. BROWN HORN 15 EDITORS COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS Amy Harper and Susan Jennings Farmer
    [Show full text]
  • Great Plains. in Respiration and Increase in Net Primary Productivity Due Source: Adapted from Anderson (1995) and Schaefer and Ball (1995)
    Great Plains Gary Bentrup and Michele Schoeneberger Gary Bentrup is a research landscape planner, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service, USDA National Agroforestry Center; Michele Schoeneberger is research program lead and soil scientist (retired), USDA Forest Service, USDA National Agroforestry Center. Description of the Region generates a total market value of about $92 billion, approx- imately equally split between crop and livestock production Extending from Mexico to Canada, the Great Plains Region (USDA ERS 2012). Agricultural activities range in the northern covers the central midsection of the United States and is Plains from crop production, dominated by alfalfa, barley, corn, divided into the northern Plains (Montana, Nebraska, North hay, soybeans, and wheat to livestock production centered on Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming) and the southern Plains beef cattle along with some dairy cows, hogs, and sheep. In (Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas). This large latitudinal range the southern Plains, crop production is centered predominantly leads to some of the coldest and hottest average temperatures in on wheat along with corn and cotton, and extensive livestock the conterminous United States and also to a sharp precipitation production is centered on pastureland or rangelands and inten- gradient from east to west (fig. A.6). The region also experi- sive production in feedlots. Crop production is a mixture of 82 ences multiple climate and weather hazards, including floods, percent dryland and 18 percent irrigated cropland, with 34 and droughts, severe thunderstorms, rapid temperature fluctuations, 31 percent of total irrigated cropland in the region occurring in tornadoes, winter storms, and even hurricanes in the far Nebraska and Texas, respectively (USDA NRCS 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Planting and Care of Trees in South Dakota E
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Extension Circulars SDSU Extension 2-1936 Planting and Care of Trees in South Dakota E. R. Ware Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/extension_circ Recommended Citation Ware, E. R., "Planting and Care of Trees in South Dakota" (1936). Extension Circulars. Paper 355. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/extension_circ/355 This Circular is brought to you for free and open access by the SDSU Extension at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Extension Circulars by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Extension Circular 356 F'ebruary 1936 Planting and Care of TreeS:in0 J South Dakota Fig. 1.-Large specimen of a Russian olive tree. SOUTH DAKOTA STATE COLLEGE EXTENSION SERVICE A. M. Eberle, Director, Brookings, South Dakota ( South Dakota State Planning Board Board Members Forestation Committee W. R. Ronald, Mitchell, Chairman Robert D. Lusk, Huron, Chairman Robert D. Lusk, Huron, Vice Chair. Walter Webb, Mitchell S. H. Collins, Aberdeen, Secretary A. L. Ford, Brookings I. D. Weeks, Vermillion Theodore Krueger, Deadwood Theodore Reise, Mitchell Robert G. Fair, Huron Nick Caspers, Rapid City Emil Loriks, Arlington Judge J. R. Cash, Bonesteel Theo W osnuk, Aberdeen Dr. P. B. Jenkins, Pierre C. A. Russell, Pierre Dr. James C. Clark, Sioux Falls Dr. Chas. W. Pugsley, Consultant Charles Entsminger, Chamberlain Dr. T. H. Cox, Associate Consultant Charles Trimmer, Pierre Walter Slocum, Researc;h Assistant EXPLANATION OF COVER CUT Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The "Great Plains Shelterbelt" and Its Development Into "The Prarie States
    (con) THE "GREAT PLAINS SHELTERBELT" AND ITS DEVEWPM!NT iiro "THE PRAIRIE STATES FORESTRY PROJECT" by Lester C. Dunn A Thosis Presented to the Faculty JAN 7 1958 of the School of Forestry Oregon State College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Decree Bachelor of Science March 1914 Approved: Professor of Forestry Table of Contents Pago Introduotion Part One i The'Groat Plaina Shelterbelt" Project I The Inception of the Plan i II. Reasons for the Prorsn 2 III. The Scopo of the Proram Iv. Development of the Project V. The Aims und Pror&n of the Forat Sorvice in the light of the investigations made 9 VI. Organisation of the Sholterbolt Administration when planting was started 13 VII. Work Conzpleted by the "Groat Plaine Sheiterbolt Project" 13 Part Two 15 "The Prairie States Forestry Project" 15 I. The Establishment of the Treo Planting Project on a Secure Basis 15 Ii. The Organization and Provisions of the Now Program 15 Part Three Results of the Plantings Under Both Systems 17 I, General Results 17 II. Specific Results 10 Part Four The Major Difforencea Between the Oriina1 and Present Shelterbelt Planting Programs I. Sise and Location of the Shelterboits 19 II . The Type of Belts to be Planted 19 III. The Permanence of the Program 19 IV. The Distribution of Expense 20 V.. Rho Representation in the Planning 20 Part Five Conclusions 21 Appendix Table i 22 Table 3 23 Table 14 214 Bibliography I NTRODUCT IO' The purposc of this thesis is the presentation of a olear, understand- able review of the original "Great Plain8 Sheltorbelt" and its successor tIThe Prairie Stateß Forestry Project." Due to the rather unfortunate publioity attendant to the announcement of the oriina1 shelterbelt ,1an, and the many and varied ideas pained concerning it, there is often a somewhat confused conception of the entire program in the minds of those who hear "he1terbe1t" mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Qualifications to Provide Airport Services TABLE of CONTENTS Related to the Development of a Regional Class C Airport
    CONSULTANT INFORMATION | 1 INTRODUCTION Snyder & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications to provide airport services TABLE OF CONTENTS related to the development of a regional class C airport. 1. CONSULTANT INFORMATION 1 The Request for Qualifications issued by the South 2. QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY PERSONNEL 8 Central Regional Airport Agency (SCRAA) sets forth the 3. CAPABILITIES, KNOWLEDGE & EXPERIENCE 17 following objectives: Airport Site Selection Airport Layout Plan and Narrative/Master Plan Environmental Documentation and Mitigation Land Acquisition Preliminary and final design associated with the construction of runways, taxiways, aprons, landing and navigational aids. Preliminary and final design associated with the construction of aircraft storage facilities, fuel facilities, utilities, vehicle access and parking facilities, terminal building and other landside infrastructure improvements Obstruction mitigation ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Snyder & Associates, Inc. has assembled a team of highly qualified professionals to provide the SCRAA with the technical expertise and public relations experience required to successfully complete the above referenced proejcts. The following organizational chart depicts how the team will interact with the governing bodies and stakeholders. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Scott Tener, FAA Planner for Iowa Donald Harper, P.E., Iowa Airport Engineer South Central Regional Airport Agency Iowa DOT Office of Aviation Michelle McEnany, Director Jim Hansen (chair),
    [Show full text]
  • The Shelterbelt “Scheme”: Radical Ecological Forestry and the Production Of
    The Shelterbelt “Scheme”: Radical Ecological Forestry and the Production of Climate in the Fight for the Prairie States Forestry Project A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY MEAGAN ANNE SNOW IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Roderick Squires January 2019 © Meagan A. Snow 2019 Acknowledgements From start to finish, my graduate career is more than a decade in the making and getting from one end to the other has been not merely an academic exercise, but also one of finding my footing in the world. I am thankful for the challenge of an ever-evolving committee membership at the University of Minnesota’s Geography Department that has afforded me the privilege of working with a diverse set of minds and personalities: thank you Karen Till, Eric Sheppard, Richa Nagar, Francis Harvey, and Valentine Cadieux for your mentorship along the way, and to Kate Derickson, Steve Manson, and Peter Calow for stepping in and graciously helping me finish this journey. Thanks also belong to Kathy Klink for always listening, and to John Fraser Hart, an unexpected ally when I needed one the most. Matthew Sparke and the University of Washington Geography Department inspired in me a love of geography as an undergraduate student and I thank them for making this path possible. Thank you is also owed to the Minnesota Population Center and the American University Library for employing me in such good cheer. Most of all, thank you to Rod Squires - for trusting me, for appreciating my spirit and matching it with your own, and for believing I am capable.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Airports by IATA Code: a ­ Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia List of Airports by IATA Code: a from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    9/8/2015 List of airports by IATA code: A ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia List of airports by IATA code: A From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia List of airports by IATA code: A ­ B ­ C ­ D ­ E ­ F ­ G ­ H ­ I ­ J ­ K ­ L ­ M ­ N ­ O ­ P ­ Q ­ R ­ S ­ T ­ U ­ V ­ W ­ X ­ Y ­ Z See also: List of airports by ICAO code A The DST column shows the months in which Daylight Saving Time, a.k.a. Summer Time, begins and ends. A blank DST box usually indicates that the location stays on Standard Time all year, although in some cases the location stays on Summer Time all year. If a location is currently on DST, add one hour to the time in the Time column. To determine how much and in which direction you will need to adjust your watch, first adjust the time offsets of your source and destination for DST if applicable, then subtract the offset of your departure city from the offset of your destination. For example, if you were flying from Houston (UTC−6) to South Africa (UTC+2) in June, first you would add an hour to the Houston time for DST, making it UTC−5, then you would subtract ­5 from +2. +2 ­ (­5) = +2 + (+5) = +7, so you would need to advance your watch by seven hours. If you were going in the opposite direction, you would subtract 2 from ­5, giving you ­7, indicating that you would need to turn your watch back seven hours. Contents AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ AR AS AT AU AV AW AX AY AZ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airports_by_IATA_code:_A 1/24 9/8/2015 List of airports by IATA code: A ­ Wikipedia, the free
    [Show full text]
  • The Lippisch Letter
    The Lippisch Letter August 2007 Experimental Aircraft Association Chapter 33 A monthly publication of the Dr. Alexander M. Lippisch AirVenture Cup Air Race 2007 Chapter of the Experimental By Greg Zimmerman Aircraft Association, Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The Airventure cup race is the world’s largest Cross Country air race. Last year Harry Hinkley raced 301E to a third place finish in Editor: David Koelzer the Sport class, at 278.53 MPH. He was only 6 seconds off the 2nd EAA Chapter 33 Officers place plane which was also a Swearingen SX300. This Year I was able to race, with Harry being the Co-Pilot. President: Randy Hartman 319-365-9775 We arrived in Dayton just before Noon on Saturday the 21st. We [email protected] checked in, got our Race credentials, met with some old friends and Vice President: TomCaruthers looked over the competition. This year the planes to beat were one 319-895-6989 Nemesis NXT, several Lancair Legacy’s and Glassair III’s, along [email protected] with the usual Swearingen competition. That night we had a nice banquet at the Engineers Club, a few beverages and then off to Secretary & Newsletter Editor: bed. David Koelzer 319-373-3257 [email protected] Sunday morning we were at the field early for last minute speed tweaks, wax job etc. There was much good natured ribbing with the Treasurer: Thomas Meeker other Racers about running this year with the gear down, flying the 319-899-0037 [email protected] Flight Advisors: Dave Lammers 319-377-1425 Technical Counselors: Tom Olson 319-393-5531 Ron White 319-393-6484 Marv Hoppenworth 396-6283 Young Eagles: John Anderson 319-362-6159 Connie White 319-393-6484 Board of Directors: Todd Millard Tom Olson Alan Kritzman www.eaa33.org EAA Chapter 33 1 The Lippisch Letter race at 18,000 feet etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Wind Erosion with Barriers
    Reducing Wind Erosion with Barriers E. L. Skidmore, L. J. Hagen ASSOC. MEMBER ASAE ABSTRACT or drag force exerted on the ground surface is deter­ mined by velocity gradient or the change in velocity HEN wind shear forces on the soil surface exceed with height. The velocity gradient windspeed profile is the soil's resistance to those forces, soil particles W given by detach and are transported by the wind. Barriers ob­ struct the wind and reduce the wind's speed, thus, du u* reducing wind erosion. [1] Application of a model, developed for evaluating ef­ dz kz fectiveness of a barrier for reducing the capacity of local wind to cause erosion, illustrated: (a) Wind erosion forces are reduced more than windspeed. (b) Properly where oriented barriers give much more protection when pre­ u = mean windspeed at height z above the mean ponderance of wind erosion forces in prevailing wind ground surface; erosion direction is high than when preponderance is k = the von Karman constant (0.4); and low. (c) When preponderance of wind erosion forces is u* = friction velocity further defined as (T/Q)1/2, low, barrier orientation is almost inconsequential. where (d) Because of seasonal variation of wind direction and T = surface shear (force per unit area) and speed, need for and amount of protection also vary Q = fluid density. seasonally. The surface shear then is Many trees, shrubs, tall growing crops, and grasses, and slat-fences all can be used as barriers to reduce T = PU* [2] wind erosion. INTRODUCTION The eddy diffusion equation for steady-state, one- Wind erosion continues to be a serious problem in dimensional momentum transport is many parts of the world (Food and Agricultural Or­ ganization, 1960) and is the dominant problem on about 30 million ha of land in the United States (USDA, T = pK.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Agriculture
    Plant Agriculture “The soil is the great connector of lives, the source and destination of all… without proper care for it we can have no life.” - Wendell Barry 1 ● Plants need three basic components to grow: ● Energy, which they gain by absorbing sunlight through chlorophyll in their leaves. ● The elements carbon, oxygen and hydrogen for producing sugar, which they gain from the air and water. ● Smaller amounts of other elements like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, which they absorb through the soil. 2 The Great ● During the early exploration of the Great Plains in the United States, the land was American found to be unsuitable for European-style Desert agriculture because the ecosystems were too dry. ● The area was called the “Great American Desert”. 3 ● The area of the United States from the eastern Rockies through Nebraska is considered mixed or shortgrass prairie. ● Precipitation is lower than the tallgrass prairie to the east, leading to overall shorter plant species. 4 ● Farmers encouraged to settle into these arid shortgrass prairies also had a difficult time plowing, or turning over the soil. ● Cast iron plows would become stuck and caked with clay stuck in the thick mat of prairie grasses. 5 ● A blacksmith named John Deere invented a polished steel plow that was able to cut through the Midwestern soil. ● Further improvements, including gasoline tractors and combine harvesters, lead to the conversion of arid grassland into fields of corn, wheat, and cotton. 6 ● A combination of overhunting and habitat loss severely diminished the population of grey wolves and Eastern coyotes in the Great Plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Description of Project Total Estimated Project
    FY 2020 RIIF - General Aviation Vertical Infrastructure Program Date Completed or Total Estimated State Funds Remaining Airport Description of Project State Share Other Revenue Sources Status of Project Estimated Project Cost Used Obligated Completion Date Airport funds In Design 12/31/2021 Marshalltown Municipal Airport Terminal Building Improvements 1,050,000 150,000 $0 150,000 Airport funds In Design 5/31/2021 Algona Municipal Airport 3 Stall Hangar Extension 360,000 150,000 $0 150,000 Airport funds In Design 1/1/2021 Atlantic Municipal Airport Hangar Rehabilitation 168,750 75,000 $0 75,000 Airport funds In Design 5/31/2021 Knoxville Municipal Airport Construct T-Hangar 300,000 150,000 $0 150,000 Airport funds In Design 5/31/2021 Forest City Municipal Airport Hangar Building 55,000 30,250 $0 30,250 Airport funds In Design 5/31/2021 Shenandoah Regional Airport Construct 6 Unit T-Hangar 250,000 150,000 $0 150,000 Airport funds In Design 10/1/2020 Iowa City Municipal Airport Fuel Facility Expansion 177,900 150,000 $0 150,000 Airport funds In Design 12/31/2020 Perry Municipal Airport New Fuel Facility 149,800 104,860 $0 104,860 Airport funds In Design 5/31/2021 Harlan Municipal Airport Install Hangar Doors 101,140 75,000 $0 75,000 Airport funds In Design 12/31/2020 Sibley Municipal Airport Construct New Hangar 233,500 150,000 $0 150,000 Total $2,846,090 $1,185,110 $0 $1,185,110 FY 2019 RIIF - General Aviation Vertical Infrastructure Program Date Completed or Total Estimated State Funds Remaining Airport Description of Project State Share
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 82 Tuesday, No. 6 January 10, 2017 Pages 2849–3130
    Vol. 82 Tuesday, No. 6 January 10, 2017 Pages 2849–3130 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER VerDate Sep 11 2014 19:30 Jan 09, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\10JAWS.LOC 10JAWS asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER II Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions: Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Email [email protected] Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the Phone 202–741–6000 issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]