DOCSLIB.ORG

This Section Provides an Overview of Marine-Based Operations of the Canaport Energy East Marine Terminal Located Near Saint John, NB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Section Provides an Overview of Marine-Based Operations of the Canaport Energy East Marine Terminal Located Near Saint John, NB CA PDF Page 1 of 30 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Consolidated Application Section 5 Volume 7: Construction and Operations Marine Operations 5.0 MARINE OPERATIONS This section provides an overview of marine-based operations of the Canaport Energy East marine terminal located near Saint John, NB. It also includes: a brief review of the regulatory framework and industry standards related to navigation and marine operations in Canadian waters, including a description of the Technical Review Process of Marine Terminal Systems and Transshipment Sites (TERMPOL) that Energy East is undertaking for the marine terminal a description of the site-specific marine shipping elements associated with the navigation of tankers to and from the marine terminal an overview of the marine terminal operations, including the loading of tankers and spill prevention The Canaport Energy East marine terminal will involve facilities for loading crude oil from the onshore tank terminal onto crude oil tankers. It will be constructed at the terminus of the Project near Saint John, NB, and will be operated by a subsidiary of Irving Oil Company, Limited (Irving Oil) on behalf of Energy East. Safety and environmental protection measures have been incorporated in the design of the marine terminal to reduce the potential for, and risk of incidents. 5.1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR SHIPPING The design and operation of the Canaport Energy East marine terminal is in accordance with the regulatory framework outlined in the following paragraphs. Marine transportation in Canadian waters is authorized and regulated through the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 and related legislation and regulations administered by Transport Canada and the Canadian Coast Guard. The Canada Shipping Act, 2001 is the umbrella act for marine activities in Canadian waters and includes numerous regulations. For all of the regulations and orders pursuant to the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, and related acts and regulations, see the Transport Canada website1. In conjunction with the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act and the international conventions and standards established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), these regulations and standards provide the framework for: marine safety pollution prevention enforcement 1 http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/acts-regulations/acts-2001c26.htm May 2016 Page 5-1 CA PDF Page 2 of 30 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Section 5 Consolidated Application Marine Operations Volume 7: Construction and Operations oil spill preparedness 5.1.1 Canada Shipping Act The Canada Shipping Act, 2001 is the principal legislation governing safety in marine transportation and recreational boating, as well as protection of the marine environment. It applies to Canadian vessels operating in all waters and to all vessels operating in Canadian waters. The Canada Shipping Act, 2001 “promotes the sustainable growth of the marine shipping industry without compromising safety.”2 The objectives of the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 are to:3 protect the health and well-being of individuals, including the crews of vessels, who participate in marine transportation and commerce promote safety in marine transportation and recreational boating protect the marine environment from damage due to navigation and shipping activities develop a regulatory scheme that encourages viable, effective and economical marine transportation and commerce promote an efficient marine transportation system develop a regulatory scheme that encourages the viable, effective and economical use of Canadian waters by recreational boaters ensure that Canada can meet its international obligations under bilateral and multilateral agreements with respect to navigation and shipping encourage the harmonization of marine practices establish an effective inspection and enforcement program for marine transportation 5.1.2 Vessel Regulation In addition to the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, marine transportation is also subject to international conventions, including the: International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), which was designed to minimize pollution of the marine environment by ships from both operational and accidental causes, and which sets the regulations for ballast water discharge International Safety Management (ISM) Code, which was developed by the IMO and became mandatory in 1994 with the adoption of Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), Chapter IX. 2 Extract from Transport Canada website (see Footnote 1). 3 Extracted from the Canada Shipping Act, 2001. Page 5-2 May 2016 CA PDF Page 3 of 30 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Consolidated Application Section 5 Volume 7: Construction and Operations Marine Operations Implementation of the ISM Code became mandatory for all tankers and chemical carriers (and gas and bulk carriers over 500 gross tons) on 1 July 1998. A key element of the code stipulates that companies must develop, implement and maintain a verifiable safety management system with the objective of obtaining a Safety Management Certificate for the vessel. 5.1.3 Pilotage Act The Canadian government (Transport Canada) enacted the Pilotage Act in 1972. The mandate of pilotage authorities is to establish, operate, maintain and administer, in the interest of safety, an efficient pilotage service in their region. Pursuant to the Pilotage Act, each authority: establishes compulsory pilotage areas prescribes the class of ship requiring pilotage administers and regulates pilot’s licences and certificates controls tariffs The Pilotage Act establishes four authorities, each with regulations and responsibility for the following regions: Atlantic Pacific Great Lakes Laurentian The Atlantic Pilotage Authority’s area of operation is all Canadian waters in and around the provinces of NB, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Located in NB, Saint John is one of the compulsory pilotage areas under the Atlantic Pilotage Authority. 5.1.4 Canada Marine Act The Canadian port authorities were created under the Canada Marine Act to operate particular ports on behalf of the Government of Canada. In 1999, the Minister of Transport incorporated the Saint John Port Authority (SJPA), making it one of the designated port authorities under the Canada Marine Act. The Canaport Energy East marine terminal will be located within the designated jurisdiction of the SJPA. 5.1.5 Saint John Port Authority The Canaport Energy East marine terminal will be located in the jurisdiction of the Port of Saint John, which is New Brunswick’s largest port, handling primarily bulk and break-bulk cargo such as petroleum products and liquefied natural gas (LNG), May 2016 Page 5-3 CA PDF Page 4 of 30 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Section 5 Consolidated Application Marine Operations Volume 7: Construction and Operations potash and salt and other bulk cargos. The Port of Saint John also has the only container terminal in NB and a growing cruise ship industry. The Port of Saint John harbour limits (i.e., regulatory limits) extend into the Bay of Fundy, from Partridge Island west to Musquash Harbour, and due south to Cape Spencer at 45 08' 03"N, 65 54' 37"W. The harbour includes the Irving Canaport Single Buoy Mooring (SBM) and Canaport LNG Terminal. The Port of Saint John’s designated anchorages and pilot boarding areas are also contained within the limits of the outer harbour. For the limits of the SJPA, see Figure 5-1. 4 Figure 5-1: Limits of the Saint John Port Authority (CA Rev. 0) The SJPA publishes detailed vessel practices and procedures that include: pilot boarding stations heavy weather provisions tugs navigation restrictions 4 Figure 5-1 was extracted from Saint John Port Authority 2011 Land Use Plan. Port Saint John. Page 5-4 May 2016 CA PDF Page 5 of 30 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Consolidated Application Section 5 Volume 7: Construction and Operations Marine Operations 5.1.6 Vessel Traffic Services Regulations Under the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, the Vessel Traffic Services Zones Regulations define the Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) provided by the Canadian Coast Guard MCTS, which includes marine safety communications and management of vessel traffic movement. Local Marine Communication and Traffic Services (MCTS) centres monitor distress frequencies, broadcast weather information and notices to shipping, and coordinate the movement of vessel traffic within VTS zones. The Bay of Fundy region is covered by the VTS Zone Fundy. The local MCTS office is located at Shannon Hill in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia at the time of this filing. For the VTS Zone Fundy, see Figure 5-2. 5.1.7 Oil-Handling Facility Requirements The Canaport Energy East marine terminal will be an OHF, as defined by Section 2 of the Canada Shipping Act, 2001. As such, there are oil spill planning and prevention requirements that the terminal must comply with. The following regulations and standards apply to oil spill response requirements at OHFs: Response Organizations and Oil-Handling Facilities Regulations, SOR/95-405 Oil-Handling Facilities Standards, 1995 (TP12402) Environmental Response Arrangements Regulations, SOR/2008-275 Vessel Pollution and Dangerous Chemicals Regulations’ SOR/2012-69 OHF requirements will be assessed as part of TERMPOL. This study details the planning and prevention measures that the marine terminal, as an OHF, will implement. For emergency planning procedures, see Section 6, Emergency Preparedness and Response. 5.1.8 Terminal Security The Marine Transportation Security Regulations (MTSR) enacted pursuant to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regulation of Access to Oil Pipelines 777
    REGULATION OF ACCESS TO OIL PIPELINES 777 THE NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD: REGULATION OF ACCESS TO OIL PIPELINES JENNIFER HOCKING* In the past few years, a number of long-distance oil pipelines have been proposed in Canada — Northern Gateway, the Trans Mountain Expansion, Keystone, and the Energy East Project. This article describes the criteria used by the National Energy Board in approving the allocation of capacity in oil pipelines to firm service contracts while requiring that a reasonable percentage of capacity is allocated for uncommitted volumes (common carriage). It explains the economic theory related to regulation of access to major oil pipelines. It reviews and analyzes relevant NEB decisions, which show that the NEB supports well- functioning competitive markets, but will exercise its discretion to resolve complaints where markets are not functioning properly. The article also explains the economic significance of the proposed long-distance oil pipelines to Canada and Alberta despite the current low price of crude oil. The article concludes with recommendations for a written NEB policy regarding access to capacity in oil pipelines. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SIGNIFICANCE OF PROPOSED OIL PIPELINES TO THE CANADIAN ECONOMY ................................. 778 A. PIPELINES NEEDED DESPITE LOW PRICE OF OIL ............... 780 B. SHIPPING OF OIL BY RAIL ................................ 781 II. OIL PIPELINES AS COMMON CARRIERS ........................... 781 A. THE NATURE OF COMMON CARRIERS ....................... 781 B. COMMON CARRIAGE OBLIGATION SUBJECT TO REASONABLENESS TEST ............................... 783 C. WHY WERE OIL PIPELINES ORIGINALLY DESIGNATED AS COMMON CARRIERS? ................................. 784 III. MAJOR LONG-DISTANCE OIL PIPELINES TODAY ................... 785 A. ENBRIDGE PIPELINES .................................... 786 B. TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE .............................. 787 C. SPECTRA ENERGY EXPRESS-PLATTE .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Pilotage in Canada: a Cost Benefit Analysis
    Canadian Marine Pilots’ Association Marine Pilotage in Canada: A Cost Benefit Analysis Prepared by Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. March, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Project Background .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Discounting Technique and Time Period ......................................................................... 8 1.3 Approach to the Economic Evaluation ............................................................................. 9 2. The Safety Case for Pilotage: Background and Methodology ........................................... 10 2.1 The Effectiveness of Pilotage in the Great Belt of Denmark ......................................... 11 2.2 The Effectiveness of Escort Tugs in Puget Sound and Vancouver ................................ 17 2.3 Summarizing the Safety Effectiveness of Pilotage ........................................................ 18 3. Safety Cost Benefit Analysis by Vessel Type ................................................................... 23 3.1 Tanker Ship Assessment ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts from Operation of Canada's Energy Transmission
    Economic Impacts from Operation of Canada’s Energy Transmission Pipelines A Special Report Prepared for the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association By Angevine Economic Consulting Ltd. April 2016 The Economic Impacts from Operation of Canada’s Energy Transmission Pipelines | April 2016 Economic Impacts from Operation of Canada’s Energy Transmission Pipelines Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Results of I-O Model Simulations A. Impacts from operation of crude oil, natural gas liquids and refined petroleum products transmission pipelines ................................................................................. 1 B. Impacts from operation of natural gas transmission pipelines ................................... 4 C. Impacts from operation of all transmission pipelines………………………………….. 6 D. Impacts of two proposed pipelines ……………………………………………...............7 E. Impact summary……………………………………………………………………….….10 Detailed Methodology…………………………………………………………………….…11 Energy Pipelines Included in the Analysis……………………………………………...12 The Economic Impacts from Operation of Canada’s Energy Transmission Pipelines | April 2016 Introduction This report summarizes key findings obtained from using the current (2010) version of the Statistics Canada Interregional Input/Output (I-O) Model to estimate the economic impacts from operation of the energy transmission pipelines currently operating in Canada as well as from two proposed but not yet approved
    [Show full text]
  • Energy East Pipeline Project
    WhenEnergy the pipeline East: spills... Previous ruptures along TransCanada’s Mainline – part of the planned Energy East pipeline project. Photos by the Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Cover photos Pipeline Investigation Report P09H0074 Top left: Aerial Photo of the Englehart Occurrence Site, from , Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Available at http://www.tsb. gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/pipeline/2009/p09h0074/p09h0074.aspPipeline Investigation Report P11H0011 Top right: Downstream line-break section of Line 100-2, from , Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Available at http://www.tsb. gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/pipeline/2011/p11h0011/p11h0011.aspPipeline Investigation Report P09H0083 Bottom: Aerial photo of the Marten River occurrence site, from , Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Available at http://www.tsb. gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/pipeline/2009/p09h0083/p09h0083.aspEnergy East: When the pipeline spills... is published under the Creative Commons licence Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0. Images used within this document remain copyrighted by their respective owners except where specifically indicated. Energy East: When the pipeline spills... TransCanada’s Energy East pipeline project would convertIt would an up be to the40-year-old largest oil natural pipeline gas inpipeline North to America, carry crude oil from Saskatchewan to Ontario, connecting it with new pipeline through Quebec and on to Saint John, New Brunswick. transporting 1.1 million barrelsif of oil every day. when where how much When it comes to pipelines, it is not a matter of a pipeline spills, it is a matter of , and it spills. NL AB SK MB Edmonton Hardisty Regina ON QC PE Winnipeg Thunder Bay Quebec City NB Montreal NS North Bay Saint John Ottawa Selective memory: TransCanada’s safety record.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2010 Red Head United Church Hall, Saint John, NB Meeting 6:10 Pm – 8:00 Pm
    Canaport LNG Project Canaport Community Environmental Liaison Committee (CCELC) Minutes of Meeting CCELC # 60 Monday, 8 March 2010 Red Head United Church Hall, Saint John, NB Meeting 6:10 pm – 8:00 pm APPROVED AS AMENDED Committee Present: • Armstrong, Carol Resident • Brown, Alice Resident • Debly, Teresa Resident • Dalzell, Gordon SJ Citizens Coalition for Clean Air • Forsythe, Fraser Co-Chair (Canaport LNG) • Garnett, Vern SJ Citizens Coalition for Clean Air • Griffin, Dennis Resident • Hunter, Roger Resident • Johnston, Jan Resident • MacKinnon, Claude ACAP Representative • McNeill, Pam Resident • Smith, Elsie Resident • Thompson, David H. Fundy Baykeeper Committee Absent: • Court, Ivan Mayor of Saint John • Griffin, Glenn Resident • Melvin, Keith Department of Energy • Perry, Yvonne Member • Rogers, Kathy Member • Thompson, David Member • Turner, Rick Saint John Board of Trade Resources: • Forsythe, Joel Fundy Engineering • O’Brien, Kevin City of Saint John • Peterson, David Department of the Environment Observers: • 1 Person CCELC Meeting Minutes: 8 March 2010 1 (1) OPENING REMARKS: The meeting commenced at 6:10 pm with Fraser Forsythe welcoming everyone. Mr. Forsythe introduced Captain John McCann, Director of Operations and Harbour Master for the Port of Saint John. The agenda was approved. Review & Approval of Minutes from Meeting #5 (1 February 2010): The minutes of meeting #59 on 1 February 2010 were approved, motioned by Vern Garnett and seconded by Gordon Dalzell with the following amendments: Within question 17 some comments by Mr. Dalzell were missing. The minutes will be amended to include comments by Mr. Dalzell that the discussion surrounding question 17 exemplifies the need for continued monthly meetings. The approved minutes will be posted to the Canaport LNG website (www.canaportlng.com).
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Route for the Intercolonial Railway Through the Provinces Of
    : 7. - --^;»" y e t- * /^ THE BEST ROUl^ FOR THE "TV INTERCOLONIAL RAILWAY THROUGH THE PROVINCES OP QUEBEC AND NEW BRUNSWICK, CONSIDERED BY A\^ALTER. M. BUCK, O. E. ST. JOHN, N. B. ' wrS5 WILLIAM M.WRIGHT, CORNER MARKET SQUARE & FRINGE WILLIAM (STREET, 1867. %.« rr t^ i I- /, I/; ^^ / I >'' ^ f j.i^i i ^ 1/.' I •, :;( I'^s ? : rM}^^!.vjy ^ >*- '>? -•• '" '• ? 'd; .. •^vt^^l::..', fc:^,^'J '^''H'tiH •5;-.-i .j-"^ , ( THE INTERCOLONIAL RAILWAY. WHICH IS TEE BEST ROUTE THROUGH THE PROVINCES OF QUEBEC AND NEW BRUNSWICK? , =. , .. This has become the momentous question of the day, the great topic for Editorial correspondence and comment, and will, before long, be made the important subject for debate iu the new House of Commons at Ottawa. Three routes have been selected from many already surveyed and reported upon. The chosen three are, 1st,—" North Shore" ; 2nd,—'' Central " ; 3rd,— •'Frontier," To these may now be added a fourth, more recently advocated, viz : the "Western" —beinga combination of the "Frontier" and "Central" includ- ing the proposed branch from Fredericton to Hartt's Mills on the Oromocto Kiver, and the Western Extension Railway to St. John. ; Each of these routes has, doubtless, numerous firm supporters as representatives of the Northern and Eastern, the Central, and the Western interests of the Province : and the combined influence of each sectional interest will be brought to bear upon the deliberations of the General Government, during the first Session of the Parliament of the New Dominion. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ROUTES.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments
    Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments Updated April 1, 2015 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43787 Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments Summary TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for further delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day. Because it would cross the Canadian-U.S. border, Keystone XL requires a Presidential Permit from the State Department based on a determination that the pipeline would “serve the national interest.” To make its national interest determination (NID), the department considers potential effects on energy security; environmental and cultural resources; the economy; foreign policy, and other factors. Effects on environmental and cultural resources are determined by preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NID process also provides for public comment and requires the State Department to consult with specific federal agencies. TransCanada originally applied for a Presidential Permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2008. Since then various issues have affected the completion of both the NEPA and NID processes for the project. In particular, during the NID process for the 2008 application, concerns over environmental impacts in the Sand Hills of Nebraska led the state to enact new requirements that would change the pipeline route. Facing a 60-day decision deadline imposed by Congress, the State Department denied the 2008 permit application on the grounds that it lacked information about the new Nebraska route.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint John YMCA • Maritime Ontario • Bath Iron Works • 45 Stuart St. First
    connections the biannual newsmagazine of the OSCO Construction Group fall & winter 2014 Saint John YMCA • Maritime Ontario • Bath Iron Works • 45 Stuart St. First 2000 NEBT Girders in Maritimes • Cabela’s • Floating Concrete the biannual newsmagazine of fall & winter 2014 connections the OSCO Construction Group what’s inside projects 4 .....Saint John YMCA 16 ...Cabela’s 22 ...Icon Bay Tower 6 .....Maritime Ontario 17.... Harbour Isle 22 ... Miscellaneous 8 .....Bath Iron Works Hazelton Metals Division 9 .....45 Stuart Street 17....Mr. Lube 23 ...Spryfield Bridge 18 ... Marine Terminal 24 ...Floating Concrete 10 ...Irving Oil Refinery 3 ..... Message from Projects 14 ... Fire Training 24 ...Scotia Wind Farms the President 20 ... Misc Rebar Projects Structure 25 ... The Bend Radio 52 ...Our Locations 14 ...Starfish Properties 20 ...Food Station 15 ... First 2000 NEBT 21 ...Bell Aliant 30 ... Wood Islands Girders in Maritimes 22 ...Varners Bridge Wharf profiles priorities 12 ... Product: Staggered Truss Framing (Summer House) 31 ... Safety: Safety Awards & Strescon Pipe Plant Milestone 26 ... Product: Precast Parking Garages 32 ... Technology: Summerside Plant Renovations 33 ...Technology: Best Nests 36 ... Environment: Restoring the landscape 37 ... Environment: e-waste people 41 ...Communication: Information Corner 42 ... OSCO Announces 41 ...Communication: Email sign up Promotions 44 ... Employee Appreciation Celebration 47 ... Employee Recognition Program public & 48 ...Retirement Lane community 49 ...Group Picnic 50 ...Group Golf Tournament 38 ...Saint John Touch a Truck 50 ... Strescon Golf 38 ...OSCO Bursary Winners Tournament 38 ...Steel Day 51 ...Fresh Faces 38 ...NSCC Foundation Bursary 51 ...Congratulations 39 ... Pte. David Greenslade Bursary & Park 39 ...Special Olympics 40...OSCO Group Career Fair OSCO 40...Employer of the Year construction group CONNECTIONS is the biannual magazine of the OSCO on our cover..
    [Show full text]
  • 'Much More Gets Accomplished When Hyper-Partisanship Is Taken out of Politics': Mps, Experts, Politicos Weigh in on Leadersh
    System racism in Canada’s security and intelligence community is a persistent threat, says former CSIS intelligence officer p. 14 Michael Harris p.11 Hill Climbers p.23 THIRTY-SECOND YEAR, NO. 1770 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2020 $5.00 News New Green Leader Paul says she’s been invited to run in ridings ‘across the country,’ as she sets sights on Toronto Centre byelection BY ABBAS RANA week when she was elected as the sociations across the country to run In an interview with The Hill would run in a different riding if first Black person to lead a major as their candidate if she is unsuc- Times, Ms. Paul said she was opti- she doesn’t win Toronto Centre. ew Green Party Leader Anna- political party, says she has received cessful in her bid to win the Toronto mistic she would win the Toronto Nmie Paul, who made history last invitations from Green riding as- Centre byelection on Oct. 26. Centre riding. She also said she Continued on page 6 News News Conservative Fund says ‘Much more gets accomplished it can’t keep O’Toole’s when hyper-partisanship is taken promise to return election out of politics’: MPs, experts, rebates to riding associations politicos weigh in on leadership because of a possible fall or during global pandemic spring election ‘This is exactly the time that BY ABBAS RANA you need to have confidence onservative Leader Erin that your political leadership CO’Toole won’t be able to keep is going to be making those his leadership campaign prom- ise to return candidates’ election types of decisions with one rebates the party received in 2019 thing in mind, and that is back to the riding associations, Publications Mail Agreement #40068926 the chair of the Conservative what is best needed to save Fund told associations across the country, because of the possibility the lives of people,’ said of a fall or spring election.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Brief 1: Developments in Crude Oil Extraction and Movement
    Issue Brief 1 02/20/2015 Developments in Crude Oil Extraction and Movement Overview This paper examines crude oil extraction in North America and the transportation of extracted products within and through the Great Lakes basin to refineries in the United States, Canada and overseas. In the binational Great Lakes region, states, provinces and tribal governments experience both benefits and risks from crude oil transportation, in particular in light of the recent growth in oil extraction in North America. The benefits and risks vary depending on a variety of factors, such as the type and amount of oil transported, refinery location and the mode of transportation used to get the oil to its destination. Various modes of transportation are used to move crude oil: pipeline, train, barge/tanker vessel and truck. The majority of crude oil transported in the Great Lakes basin travels by pipeline or train. Most of that oil is brought in from other locations, some of it for refining within the region, some of it en route to refineries on the east coast or along the Gulf of Mexico. Crude oil extraction does take place in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River region, but the quantities produced and transported are minimal compared to the quantities brought in from the Alberta oil sands and the Bakken shale formation. Vastly increased production from the latter two sources has led to an important increase in oil transportation through the basin. Description of U.S. and Canada Crude Oil Oil Sands Crude Oil Oil sands (also called tar sands) crude oil is considered an unconventional type of hydrocarbon and is found in two main reserves in the world, one in Venezuela and one in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Emergency Response Protocols for Crude Oil Transportation: Pipeline Vs Rail
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies Master of Public Policy Capstone Projects 2015-09 Evaluation of Emergency Response Protocols for Crude Oil Transportation: Pipeline vs Rail Bhura, Alisha Bhura, Alisha. (2015). Evaluation of Emergency Response Protocols for Crude Oil Transportation: Pipeline vs Rail ( Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51657 report Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Master of Public Policy Capstone Project Evaluation of Emergency Response Protocols for Crude Oil Transportation: Pipeline vs. Rail Submitted by: Alisha Bhura Approved by Supervisor: Dr. Bev Dahlby, September 15, 2015 Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of PPOL 623 and completion of the requirements for the Master of public Policy degree Acknowledgements Completion of this capstone project would not have been possible without a number of individuals. I would like to thank Dr. Bev Dahlby for his advice and guidance, Laura Fitterer for her constant support and Dan McFayden for his direction and experience. Executive Summary This capstone project reviews and evaluates the emergency response protocols for crude oil transportation via pipeline and rail. The growth of the Canada’s oil sands and the use of hydraulic fracturing are providing access to what were previously thought to be uneconomic oil and gas deposits. This coupled with our growing use of crude oil is changing the energy landscape in North America. To accommodate this changing environment, increased transportation of crude oil is necessary. The increase in energy production and transport has had a parallel increase in public awareness of energy and dangerous goods transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT VOLUME 1 OF 2: ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT BRUNSWICK PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT NO. 1003790 MAY 2006 REPORT NO. 1003790 REPORT TO Brunswick Pipeline Project c/o 1801 Hollis Street, Suite 1600 Halifax, NS B3J 3N4 FOR Brunswick Pipeline Project ON Environmental & Socio-Economic Assessment May 2006 Jacques Whitford 711 Woodstock Road Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5C2 Phone: 506-457-3200 Fax: 506-452-7652 www.jacqueswhitford.com BRUNSWICK PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT 1003790. May 2006 i BRUNSWICK PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT 1003790. May 2006 ii GLOSSARY Units % percent $ dollars oC degrees Celsius cm centimetre dB decibel dBA decibel on the A-weighted scale Dth/d decatherms per day ha hectare km kilometre kPa kilopascal kPag kilopascal, gauge km/h kilometre per hour L litre Leq equivalent sound level Lpm litres per minute m metre m2 square metre m3 cubic metre mg/L milligrams per litre mm millimetre NTU nephelometric turbidity units ppb parts per billion ppm parts per million psig pounds per square inch, gauge tcf trillion cubic feet µg/m3 micrograms per cubic metre Acronyms/Abbreviations AC CDC Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Al aluminum BRUNSWICK PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT 1003790. May 2006 iii As arsenic ARD acid rock drainage ASU Archaeological Services Unit ATV all terrain vehicle BCWLAP British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection CAC conventional air contaminant CBSA Canadian Blood Services Agency CCME Canadian Council of Ministers
    [Show full text]