Cyrus Mccormick by Sharon Fabian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cyrus Mccormick by Sharon Fabian Name Date Cyrus McCormick By Sharon Fabian For hundreds, maybe thousands, of years farmers harvested grain with a scythe. A scythe was a tool with a long curved blade and a bent handle with bars for both hands to grip. A strong farmer could cut down about an acre of grain in one day with his scythe. Cyrus McCormick was born in 1809 and, when he was growing up, farmers were still harvesting their grain by hand. It was hard work, and it required all of their time during harvest season. Farmers could plant only as much grain as they felt confident of being able to harvest in time. Cyrus' father had thought for a long time that there must be a more efficient way to harvest grain -- some way to make use of a machine to do part of the work. He tried out all kinds of ideas in his blacksmith shop on their Walnut Grove farm, in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley, but never came up with an idea that worked well. Cyrus took up where his father left off. In 1831, at the age of 22, he had a machine ready to demonstrate. His reaper had a straight blade that was turned by a large wheel by way of some gears. The whole machine was pulled by a horse. One farmer would steer the horse, while another worker raked the cut stalks from the reaper's platform. Several more workers were needed to bind all of the grain cut by the reaper. With McCormick's reaper, farmers could harvest up to ten acres of wheat or oats per day. Farmers were quick to see the advantage of McCormick's machine; it meant that they could plant more grain than ever before. In 1834, McCormick patented his reaper after another inventor began trying to sell a model of his own. In 1840, McCormick began selling his reapers, which he made in his family's blacksmith shop at Walnut Grove. By 1844, McCormick had expanded to other states, and in 1847 he expanded again, moving his manufacturing operation to Chicago. In addition to being a creative inventor, McCormick was also a good businessman. In Chicago his modern, steam-powered plant used the latest techniques of mass production. He attracted buyers with easy credit and written guarantees. His business included a repair department and a parts department that were popular with the farmers. Chicago was a smart choice for the location of his business. It brought him closer to the huge, flat fields of the Midwest where the reaper would be most appreciated. From Chicago he could also ship reapers to the East, by way of the Great Lakes, and to the South, by way of the Mississippi River. McCormick's business later spread to England, when he entered his reaper in London's Crystal Palace Exhibition in 1851, and then on to the rest of Europe. As McCormick's business grew, he continued to make improvements to the reaper too. In 1857, he patented the new and improved McCormick Patented Reaping Machine which featured seats for the driver and the raker. In 1858, he came up with the McCormick Automatic Self-Rake Reaper. Next was the McCormick Marsh-Type Harvester, which featured a platform where two men could stand to bind the grain as it was cut. By 1876, he had figured out a machine that would bind the grain itself. This McCormick Harvester and Binder was a marvel; it required only one man to do the whole job! Later improvements produced a twine binder. And later still, tractors -- rather than horses -- pulled McCormick's reapers. Today a McCormick-Deering Harvester Thresher can harvest 40-50 acres of grain per day. Once Cyrus McCormick got his start in the reaper business, he stayed with it. McCormick was president of the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company until his death in 1884. Later, McCormick's company merged with four other companies to form the giant International Harvester Company. Name Date Cyrus McCormick Questions 1. In 1831, McCormick invented ______. A. the reaper B. the tractor C. the McCormick-Deering Harvester Thresher D. the twine binder 2. McCormick was president of the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company for a long time. A. false B. true 3. McCormick's original reaper was pulled by a tractor. A. false B. true 4. McCormick grew up in ______. A. England B. Virginia C. Washington, DC D. Chicago 5. McCormick was ______. A. both B. an inventor C. neither D. a good businessman 6. One man alone could harvest ten acres of grain per day using McCormick's original reaper. A. false B. true 7. The McCormick Marsh-Type Harvester added which improvement? A. the ability to harvest 40-50 acres per day B. a self-rake feature C. a seat for the driver and the raker D. a platform for workers to stand on while they bound the stalks 8. List three words that you could use to describe Cyrus McCormick or another successful inventor..
Recommended publications
  • Improved Innovative Siddhant Windrower Automated Reaper (IISWAR) B.S Dangi 1, S
    12603 B.S Dangi et al./ Elixir Mech. Engg. 54 (2013) 12603-12605 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Mechanical Engineering Elixir Mech. Engg. 54 (2013) 12603-12605 Improved Innovative Siddhant Windrower Automated Reaper (IISWAR) B.S Dangi 1, S. Sen Sharma 2, RK Bharilya 2 and A.K. Prasad 2 1Windrower Reaper, NIF, (National Innovation Foundation), Ahmedabad, India. 2Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur 713 209, (CSIR, Govt. of India) ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The paper reflects, machine designed and developed by authors that suit medium sized Received: 26 November 2012; farmer and farm industrialist holding only few acres of land. It has been designed and Received in revised form: developed by CMERI, Durgapur, India, in collaboration with NIF(National Innovation 15 January 2013; Foundation, Ahmedabad, India). A number of crops i.e., wheat, and pulse like soybean, Accepted: 18 January 2013; gram have been successfully reaped(harvested), and, concurrently the m/c is ready to undergo reliability&feasibility trial/inspection/check, desired for an Agri Machinery. It will Keywords be indigenously get checked for Nation wide R&D standard. The system is designed by Chaff, inculcating years of expertise in this stream. There is a keen observation by designer to Ear Heads, simplify assembling/disassembly and maintenance/ operations/ of picker reel, cutter link & Straw, blade, roll & push type auger and simplest possible bevel PTO. This prototype is a foolproof Maneuverability, machine, designed with consideration of global knowhow of scientific mechanisms of this Ergonomics. stream. The basic research work has been done thoroughly by selecting adequate technology and scientific calculations in all the assemblies and critical parts e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Producing a Past: Cyrus Mccormick's Reaper from Heritage to History
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2014 Producing a Past: Cyrus Mccormick's Reaper from Heritage to History Daniel Peter Ott Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ott, Daniel Peter, "Producing a Past: Cyrus Mccormick's Reaper from Heritage to History" (2014). Dissertations. 1486. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1486 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2014 Daniel Peter Ott LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO PRODUCING A PAST: CYRUS MCCORMICK’S REAPER FROM HERITAGE TO HISTORY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY JOINT PROGRAM IN AMERICAN HISTORY / PUBLIC HISTORY BY DANIEL PETER OTT CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2015 Copyright by Daniel Ott, 2015 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the result of four years of work as a graduate student at Loyola University Chicago, but is the scholarly culmination of my love of history which began more than a decade before I moved to Chicago. At no point was I ever alone on this journey, always inspired and supported by a large cast of teachers, professors, colleagues, co-workers, friends and family. I am indebted to them all for making this dissertation possible, and for supporting my personal and scholarly growth.
    [Show full text]
  • George W. Perkins and the International Harvester Steel Properties
    "... a dishonestman isat leastprudent." GeorgeW. Perkinsand theInternational Harvester Steel Properties Fred V. Carstensen University of Virginia On the afternoon of 13 February, 1902, Judge Elbert H. Gary had a "long talk" with Cyrus H. McCormick, Jr., president of the leading harvester manufacturer, the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company. Gary was worried. McCormick's principal competitor, the Deering Haverster Company, was installing a small rolling mill at their Chicago factory; the Deerings had also purchased the large Hawkins mine in the Mesabi range, and bought controlling interest in South Chicago Furnace Company, located just south of Chicago, where new steel furnaces were under construction. If completed, such vertical integration would not only deprive Judge Gary's US Steel of an important consumer of steel, but its example and com- petitive implications would surely impel McCormick and others in the same direction, threatening US Steel's market. Gary, speaking explicitly for the recently organized steel company, told McCormick that he wanted to see if it were "possible to prevent the further prosecution of" the Deering efforts. A solution to this "difficul- ty" had come to Gary "immediately" -- "the idea of a combination." Not only would combination "be a good thing" for the reaper manu- facturers, he believed he "could prove...that it would be to their interests not to go into the steel business" as the Deerings were now doing [12]. This conversation initiated the chain of events which led to creation of International Harvester just six months later, in August 1902. The successful negotiations between the McCormicks, Deerings, and owners of two smaller companies, Warder, Bushnell & Glessner and the Plano Company, were completed in six weeks of intensive work in New York in late June and July, negotiations handled by GeorgeW.
    [Show full text]
  • ROSE Is the Best!
    HOME-SCALE GRAIN PRODUCTION John Wallace Mark Dempsey Carolina Farm Stewardship Association Organic Growers School Spring Conference – March 2020 INTRODUCTION Grain Crops Cereals Legumes Pseudo-cereals Oilseed crops Why grow on small scale? Can grow staple foods Family-scale Retail high-end grains Reduce animal feed costs Match what you grow with what you eat SCALE & EFFICIENCY Will never be efficient as: Big grain growers (lbs/hr) Vegetables ($/acre) But can: Diversify your operation Help meet nutritional needs Help rethink food system Reduce feed costs Improve soil nutrient management THE CROPS Cereals Legumes Pseudo-cereals Oilseed crops CEREALS Corn Sorghum Small Grains Wheat Rye Barley Oats “Ancient” wheats Rice CEREALS Highest yields Tolerate wider soil water range Warm vs. cool season Affects crop rotation Affects yields: Summer (corn+sorghum) > winter (small grains) Fall-planted (“winter”) > spring-planted (“spring”) Differ in nutrient requirements Warm: Higher N / Lower K Cool: Lower N / Higher K CEREALS High N demand Corn: 130 lb/a (3 lb/1000 sq.ft) Sorghum: 100 lb/a (2.3 lb/1000 sq.ft) Small grains: 60 lb/a (1.4 lb/1000 sq.ft) Lots of calories, but low nutritional value: bu/a lbs/1000sq.ft % Protein % Fat % Carb Corn 160 205 10% 5% 82% Sorghum 90 115 12% 4% 82% Wheat, rye & barley 60-90 80-125 11-14% 2% 84-86% Oat 80 60 18% 7% 71% Yields are high, they have culinary value, high energy feed for animals LEGUMES Warm Season: Dry bean & other Phaseolus spp Soybean Cowpea, Adzuki & other Vigna spp Peanut Cool Season: Pea Lentil Chick- pea LEGUMES Lower yields than cereals Narrower moisture tolerance range More sensitive to wet than dry Warm vs.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did It Happen? What Do You Know?
    NAME _____________________________________________ DATE __________________ CLASS ____________ North and South Lesson 1 The Industrial North ESSENTIAL QUESTION Terms to Know clipper ship ship with sleek hulls and tall sails that How does technology change the way “clipped” time from long journeys people live? Morse code a system of dots and dashes that represent the alphabet GUIDING QUESTIONS telegraph a device that used electric signals to 1. How did technology and industry change send messages during the 1800s? 2. What changes made agriculture more profitable in the 1830s? When did it happen? 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1807 Robert Fulton 1825 Erie 1834 McCormick introduces the Canal opens reaper is patented 1847 Elias steamboat Howe invents 1837 John Deere the sewing develops the steel- machine tipped plow 1840 First American 1844 Samuel steam-powered Morse sends the locomotive runs first telegraph message What do you know? In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column. Now... Later... What was one change as a result of the Erie Canal? In which part of the country was there more industry? What was the telegraph? Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission 181 NAME _____________________________________________ DATE __________________ CLASS ____________ North and South Lesson 1 The Industrial North, Continued Technology and Industry The early 1800s saw many innovations in industry, or the Explaining production of goods. Innovations are improved ways of doing 1. List three changes in things. There were new machines and new ways to use them.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Survey Form ER# 2018-1595-003 PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL and MUSEUM COMMISSION 03/07/2018 Bureau for Historic Preservation
    Key # 4024 Historic Resource Survey Form ER# 2018-1595-003 PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL AND MUSEUM COMMISSION 03/07/2018 Bureau for Historic Preservation International Harvester Company of America Building; McCormick Harvesting Machine Company of America Harry Guckert Company 810 W NORTH AVE ASSOCIATES LP / 1008 BRIANNA LN BETHEL PARK , PA 15102-3795 1 Allegheny Pittsburgh Pittsburgh West, PA 15233 810 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA ZIP uilding District Object Site Structure Private Public/County Public/State Public/Federal TAX PARCEL #/YEAR 0023-N-00130-0000-00 Function (Items 7-8; see Instructions, pages 4-6) Historic Function Subcategory Particular Type Industry/Processing/Extracting Industry/Processing/Extract - Manufacturing Facility Ag. Implements Current Function Subcategory Particular Type Work In Progress Domestic - Multiple Dwelling Commerce/Trade Commerce/Trade - Business Office Property Features (Items 15-17; see Instructions, pages 7-8) Setting Mixed use neighborhood Ancillary Features 0.3 PA Historic Resource Survey Form Key # 4024 ER# 2018-1595-003 Architectural/Property Information (Items 9-14; see Instructions, pages 6-7) ARCHITECTURAL CLASSIFICATION Late 19th and Early 20th Century EXTERIOR MATERIALS and STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Foundation Stone Walls Brick Roof Asphalt Other Structural System Masonry WIDTH 140 (feet) or (# bays) DEPTH 100 (feet) or (# rooms) STORIES/HEIGHT 3-4 Historical Information (Items 18-21; see Instructions, page 8) Year Construction Began 1902 Circa Year Completed 1902 Circa Date of Major Additions, Alterations Circa Circa Circa Basis for Dating Documentary Physical Explain Newspaper articles and ledger of building permit applications Cultural/Ethnic Affiliation(s) Associated Individual(s) Associated Event(s) Architect(s) Unknown Builder(s) R&S Sollitt & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Test Analysis of Straw Reaper Combine for Optimized Operating Condition to Improve the Performance
    Field test analysis of straw reaper combine for optimized operating condition to improve the performance ABSTRACT The profitability of ex-situ straw management largely depends on the quantity and quality of straw recovered from the field. The straw reaper-combine is one of the widely used ex-situ straw management technologies being used to retrieve the leftover residue in the field after grain combine operation. Besides considering the positive implication of this technology in recent times, the quality of operation, which accounts for maximizing the performance parameters of straw reaper-combine in a wheat crop. The relationship among these parameters was established using multiple linear regression techniques through the regression equation. The ANOVA test of this experiment also established the significant (P < 0.01) effect of forwarding speed and cutting height on all performance parameters. It was observed from the experiment that when the forward speed was increased while keeping the cutting height at a constant level the recovery percentage and specific energy consumption were decreased whereas, straw split percentage and actual field capacity were increased. Likewise, when cutting height was increased keeping the forward speed at a constant level the recovery and split percentage were reduced but, the actual field capacity and specific energy consumption were increased. In order to achieve maximum performance at optimum energy consumption, the straw reaper should be operated at a speed between 3-4 km/h with cutting height between 30-60 mm. Keywords: Straw recovery, Straw reaper, Specific energy consumption, Straw split, Cutting height INTRODUCTION The RWS (Rice-Wheat system) is one of the widely practiced cropping systems in India and covers about 12.3 Mha (Ladha et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Works Robert Mccormlck
    The Lif e a n d Wo rks Rob e rt M c C ormlck I n c lu d i n g Hi s I n v e n t i o n o f t h e R e a p e r Hall M cormi ck R . c J ame s Hall Shi elds P RE F A C E We have long contempl ated w riting an d comp iling a histo ry of ou r r McC ormi ck G an dfather, Robert , an d thus putting on record all the known facts conce rning h is li fe , his wo rk , an d h is inventions , an d in ou r connection the rewith fu rn ish ing all the evi dence , long in posses c r sion , rel ating to h is i nvention of the M c ormick Reape , but h ave i t now postponed f rom time to time , until , by reason of the app lica “ tion th at has b een m ade fo r the en rollment of h is n ame in the Ha ll of ” F a me r , i t becomes necessa y to fu rnish such info rm ation ; therefo re , r we h ave ca efully taken u p the subject, and on the succeed ing pages Will be f ou n d all the facts we h ave at h an d conce rning Robert M e affid av i ts i n Co rmick , togethe r with cop ies of letters , an d statements ou r i i possess ion bea r ng on the quest on of h is va rious inventions , bu t p rinci p ally an d first of all relating to h is great an d inestim able i n v en ti on r of the Reape r , an d his ea rn ing thereby a right to an en du ing H F r .
    [Show full text]
  • Cum--Binder for Harvesting of Soybean and Rice
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(3): 1754-1762 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 7 Number 03 (2018) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.207 Performance Evaluation of Reaper--cum--Binder for Harvesting of Soybean and Rice Ashutosh Tripathi, B.P. Mishra, Mithlesh Kumar*, Yogesh Singh Thakur and Kipoo Kiran Singh Mahilang Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering SVCAET & RS, FAE, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Krishak Nagar, Raipur, 492012, Chhattisgarh, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT The mechanization of harvesting operation is essential to minimize the cost of harvesting, grain production cost, grain loss, turnaround time, weather risk, and to increase benefit by appropriate technology. In order to achieve the above goal, a manually controlled reaper - cum- binder machine was tested and evaluate. This self-propelled reaper was operated in low 1st gear at forward speed of 2.5 km/h. It has 1400 mm size of cutter bar and dropped bundling mechanism. The testing of the machine was carried out with rice and soybean K e yw or ds crop during Kharif season of 2012 at the research farm of Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur. This machine made crop bundles of rice weighing about 5.3. Reaper, Binder, Rice, Soybean, The fuel consumption of machine was varied with crop type. It was found 1.22 and 1.15 Harvesting loss lit/h with soybean and rice crop respectively. According the cost of operation of reaper - cum- binder machine also varied according to type of crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyrus Mccormick & Western Agriculture Thomas Alva Edison
    HANDOUT B Rise of Big Business Radio Interview Role-Play For those with Big Business Roles: With your group members, read the Directions: biographical sketch on your assigned figure who contributed to the rise of big business. Prepare to answer questions from the interviewer and audience members. For those with Interviewer Roles: With your group members, prepare a list of questions for the figures who contributed to the rise of big business. After asking your own questions, invite audience participants to contribute their own questions. For the audience: Prepare your own questions for the figures who contributed to the rise of big business. Suggested topics: The character of the business figure The contribution of the business figure to the rise of big business General economic and social questions from the time period Rise of Big Business Role-Play Nametags Cyrus McCormick & Western Agriculture Thomas Alva Edison & Technological Inventions The Gilded Age and Progressive Era Unit 1, Lesson 1: The Rise of Big Business © Bill of Rights Institute Handout B, page 2 James J. Hill & the Railroads Andrew Carnegie & the Steel Industry John D. Rockefeller & the Oil Industry Jay Gould & American Finance J.P. Morgan & American Finance Interviewer The Gilded Age and Progressive Era Unit 1, Lesson 1: The Rise of Big Business © Bill of Rights Institute Handout B, page 3 Cyrus McCormick & the mechanical reaper was in use around the Western Agriculture world…He and his competitors had converted the American prairies from open space to the “In the open spaces of the American Midwest, breadbasket that fed the United States and much old Northwest, and Great Plains lay a potential of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Croplink Reaper
    CROPLINK REAPER Contains 200 g/l (20.6% w/w) fluroxypyr as an emulsifiable concentrate FOR USE AS AN AGRICULTURAL HERBICIDE IN WINTER AND SPRING CEREALS, FORAGE AND GRAIN MAIZE AND GRASSLAND. Please see inside for DIRECTIONS FOR USE. FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY Croplink Reaper is a translocated herbicide for the control of broad-leaved weeds, especially cleavers; • Barley • Oats • Triticale • Forage & Grain maize • Rye • Wheat • Grassland - Safety Information Danger Flammable liquid and vapour. May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways. Causes skin irritation. May cause an allergic skin reaction. Causes serious eye irritation May cause respiratory irritation May cause drowsiness or dizziness. Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects Contaminated work clothing should not be allowed out of the workplace. date IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. If skin irritation or a rash occurs: Get medical advice/attention. If eye irritation persists get medical advice/attention. Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep cool. Dispose of contents/container to a licensed to hazardous waste disposal contractor or collection site except for triple rinsed empty containers which can be disposed of as non-hazardous waste. To avoid risks to human health and the environment, comply with the instructions for use. SPECIMEN PCS No: 05842 PROTECT FROM FROST2019 Croplink (Ireland) Ltd., Springhill, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork Tel: 065 7077331 Fax: 065 7077334 5/24561-FF PRECAUTIONS In case of emergency contact the Poisons Information Center Tel: +353 1 8092566 or +353 1 8379964 Do not contaminate water with the product or its container (Do not clean application equipment near surface water/Avoid contamination via drains from farmyards and roads).
    [Show full text]
  • Who Will Help Me Harvest the Wheat: Combines and Careers in Ag Mechanics
    Who Will Help Me Harvest the Wheat? Combines and Careers in Ag Mechanics Grades: 6-12 Purpose Students will read about the development and operation of a combine harvester and learn about careers in agricultural mechanics. Students will build a model of a Archimedes’ screw, analyze design flaws and improve on the design. Keywords wheat, harvest, careers, technology, electronics, mechanics, engineering, inventions, machines, farm equipment, tools past and present Materials • Diagram of a combine, provided with this lesson • Archimedes’ Screw Lab Instruction Sheet • Reading page (Essay): “Combine Harvester: Innovating Modern Wheat Farming, Impacting the Way the World Thinks About Bread” • “Careers in Wheat Harvest Mechanics” worksheet Interest Approach or Motivator Ask students to list modern machines that combines more than one task. What modern machines are used for more than one task (smart phones, computers)? Imagine a time when there was a separate machine for each task. Ask students if they have ever invented anything or wished they could invent something to combine more than one task. Make a list of the proposed inventions on the board. Background From the early 1900s to the mid 1920s, the wheat fields of the middleWest and Great Plains were scenes of great movement. Only a few workers were needed to plant the wheat crop, using horse and plow, but large numbers of workers were needed for the harvest, because most of the work was done by hand or using hand tools. To do this work as many as 250,000 men were annually on the move from field to field, following the ripening crop.
    [Show full text]