DOCSLIB.ORG

Monthly Performance Report May 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monthly Performance Report May 2018 MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORT MAY 2018 gatwickairport.com/performance CONTENTS At Gatwick we are committed to ensuring all areas of our business live up to the Core Service Standards > expectations of our passengers, our partners and our regulator. As part of this commitment we publish monthly reports Airline Service Standards > which we have now brought together into one easy to follow report. PRM Service and Notification > You can view or download these reports at any time at gatwickairport.com/performance On-time Performance > If you have any comments or feedback to help us improve please send them to ACI Airport Service Quality Ranking > [email protected] CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 departure lounge TERMINAL seating availability 3.80 4.01 4.01 SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Ease of finding a seat TERMINAL Results from our passenger surveys 3.80 3.94 3.94 Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor NORTH Target Average score May 2018 airport TERMINAL cleanliness 4.00 4.13 4.12 SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Overall cleanliness of the terminal TERMINAL Results from our passenger surveys 4.00 4.15 4.15 Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. Average score measured over the last 12 months. 3 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 airport TERMINAL wayfinding 4.10 4.21 4.20 SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Ease of finding your way around our airport TERMINAL Results from our passenger surveys 4.10 4.26 4.26 Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor NORTH Target Average score May 2018 airport TERMINAL flight information 4.20 4.42 4.41 SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Accuracy and ease of finding flight information TERMINAL Results from our passenger surveys 4.20 4.49 4.49 Measured as a score from 1-5 5 = Excellent 1 = Extremely Poor Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. Average score measured over the last 12 months. 4 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 waiting time at TERMINAL central security search 95.00% 97.64% 97.38% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of time when passengers TERMINAL queued for 5 minutes or less 95.00% 98.01% 97.10% The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. NORTH Target Average score May 2018 waiting time at TERMINAL central security search 98.00% 99.94% 99.96% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of time when passengers TERMINAL queued for 15 minutes or less 98.00% 99.98% 100% The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. Average score measured over the last 12 months. 5 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 waiting time at TERMINAL central security search 0 0 0 SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Instance where a single queue is measured TERMINAL at 30 minutes or more 0 0 0 The waiting time is the delay imposed by the queue for security including ticket presentation and facial capture, up to the point that the passenger reaches the security roller bed. NORTH Target Average score May 2018 flight connections TERMINAL security search 95.00% 99.87% 99.60% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of time when passengers TERMINAL queued for 10 minutes or less 95.00% 98.79% 97.98% This measure applies to 95% of core hours. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. Average score measured over the last 12 months. 6 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 staff TERMINAL security search 95.00% 99.75% 98.26% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of time when staff TERMINAL queued for 5 minutes or less 95.00% 99.80% 99.92% This measure applies to 95% of core hours. North Terminal Staff performance calculated as average performance of both search areas. EXTERNAL Target Average score May 2018 external control posts CONTROL security search POSTS 95.00% 99.93% 100% Percentage of time when queue time is 15 minutes or less This measure applies to 95% of core hours. Performance for the Northen Approach Gate. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. Average score measured over the last 12 months. 7 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 passenger sensitive equipment TERMINAL priority availability 99.00% 99.63% 99.62% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Availability of priority equipment including lifts, TERMINAL escalators and passenger conveyors 99.00% 99.63% 99.29% This covers instances of equipment breakdown or unplanned maintenance affecting the availability of priority Passenger Sensitive Equipment (PSE) during core operational hours. NORTH Target Average score May 2018 passenger sensitive equipment TERMINAL general availability 99.00% 99.63% 99.63% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Availability of general equipment including lifts, TERMINAL escalators and passenger conveyors 99.00% 99.69% 99.52% This covers instances of equipment breakdown or unplanned maintenance affecting the availability of general Passenger Sensitive Equipment (PSE) during core operational hours. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. Average score measured over the last 12 months. 8 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 baggage TERMINAL outbound baggage process 97.00% 99.58% 99.97% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of flights when bags are delivered to the TERMINAL airline ground handler 25 minutes or more before 97.00% 99.58% 99.95% the scheduled time of departure This is a daily event based measure, the score shown relates to the lowest daily performance NORTH Target Average score May 2018 baggage TERMINAL outbound baggage process 99.00% 99.98% 100% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of flights when bags are delivered to the TERMINAL airline ground handler 25 minutes or more before 99.00% 99.97% 100% the scheduled time of departure This is a monthly average measure Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA. Average score measured over the last 12 months. 9 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 airfield TERMINAL stand availability 99.00% 99.87% 99.85% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of time when aircraft stands are available TERMINAL Stand availability is measured between the following agreed 99.00% 99.85% 99.90% core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 airfield TERMINAL jetty/airbridge availability 99.00% 99.87% 99.93% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of time when aircraft jetties (airbridges) TERMINAL are available for aircraft boarding/disembarking 99.00% 99.81% 99.95% Jetty availability is measured between the following agreed core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00 Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA Average score measured over the last 12 months. 10 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 airfield TERMINAL pier service 95.00% 96.81% 96.24% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of time when stands with pier service are TERMINAL available as opposed to remote stands 95.00% 97.63% 98.16% This measure is based on the total number of passenger movements (arrivals and departures). If a passenger is able to walk into the pier, then the stand is classed as a pier served stand. NORTH Target Average score May 2018 airfield TERMINAL fixed electrical ground power 99.00% 99.91% 100% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Percentage of time when fixed electrical ground TERMINAL power (FEGP) units are available for aircraft 99.00% 99.90% 100% FEGP availability is measured between the following agreed core hours: 00:00-11:00 and 19:00-00:00. FEGP powers aircraft when on a stand allowing engines to be turned off. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA Average score measured over the last 12 months. 11 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 INTER Target Average score May 2018 inter-terminal shuttle TERMINAL one shuttle available 99.00% 100% 100% Percentage of time when one shuttle with a minimum of one car is available Core hours vary dependent on agreed maintenance periods. INTER Target Average score May 2018 inter-terminal shuttle TERMINAL two shuttles available 97.00% 99.20% 98.87% Percentage of time when two shuttles with a minimum of one car each are available Core hours vary dependent on agreed maintenance periods. Measures defined and targets set in agreement with the airlines and endorsed by the CAA Average score measured over the last 12 months. 12 CORE SERVICE STANDARDS MAY 2018 NORTH Target Average score May 2018 arrivals TERMINAL baggage reclaim carousels 99.00% 99.89% 99.91% SOUTH Target Average score May 2018 Availability of our baggage reclaim TERMINAL carousels for arriving flights 99.00% 99.83% 99.87% For information on the arrivals baggage performance please refer to the Airline Service Standards section of this report.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EGNOS Implementation Status
    EGNOS implementation status H2020 BlueGNSS Final meeting Katerina Strelcova, Aviation Market Development Innovation Officer, Project officer of H2020BlueGNSS project 18 July 2018 @ENAV, Rome Table of Content • GSA introduction • EGNOS implementation status • Airspace user capabilities • GSA support to foster EGNOS implementation 2 European GNSS Agency Mission: Resourcing: Gateway to Services • Galileo & EGNOS Operations and Service Provision 160 21 Staff Nationalities • Market Development of the applications and the receivers Gatekeeper of security • Security Accreditation Prague, Cz Rep – HQ St. Germain en Laye, FR – GSMC • Operation of Galileo Security Swanwick, UK – GSMC (tbc) Monitoring Centre, governmental Torrejon, ES – GSC Noordwijk, NL – GRC service (PRS) activities Toulouse, FR – EGNOS Brussels, BE – COMM 4 1. How GSA fits in the EU structure he GSA: governance summary Political Oversight Council and European Parliament Programme Management European GNSS Programme Committee EuropeanEuropean CommissionCommission Delegation Delegation and assistance European Space Agency Working Arrangement Administrative Board Security Accreditation Board Market Development Security GSMC operation GNSS exploitation European Satellite Navigation Programmes • Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) • Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS) • Worldwide coverage • Continental coverage • 22 Satellites constellation today • Increased accuracy and integrity over GPS • Full Operational Capability by 2020 • Next version will augment Galileo 5 EGNOS
    [Show full text]
  • UK Office December 2018 TDC Report Prepared By
    UK Office December 2018 TDC Report Prepared by: Venessa Alexander UK Director Tour Operators • Virgin Holidays – We visited their office to provide Christmas cakes and branded giveaways to their Florida sales agents ahead of peak booking season. The items were very well received from the staff. • Funway Holidays - We visited their office to provide Christmas treats and branded giveaways to their sales agents ahead of the peak booking season. We got the chance to speak to the reservations team as well as the reservations manager and the treats and giveaways were gratefully received. • USAirtours/TravelPlanners - We had the chance to visit the USAirtours / TravelPlanners office to provide Christmas treats and branded giveaways to their sales agents. We had the chance to talk to the sales agents if they were not busy on the phones and then held a lunch meeting with both the product and marketing teams to discuss the proposed co-op marketing proposal that we have now received. The proposal is currently being assessed and once activity has been finalised, we will get final sign off from Brand USA. Meetings/Training/Events • SeaWorld Parks – We met with Simon Parry and Ruth Roseweir to further discuss our joint event and fam trip for next year. We will follow up in the New Year to begin sourcing a venue for the event and to work with Norwegian to secure seats for the trip. • Norwegian – We met with Nicole Richards, Marketing Manager, alongside Kenneth Strickland, Tampa Airport and Becky Fairlie-Clarke, Tampa Bay. All partners provided an update on the destination and recent and upcoming marketing activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Cook Group Airlines
    Thomas Cook Group Airlines Arne Kirchhoff c/o Condor Flugdienst GmbH Director Commercial Airport Relations FRA HI/C (Condor) & Ground Handling Procurement Condor Platz D-60549 Frankfurt am Main Direct Tel: +49 (0)6107 939 7301 Germany e-mail: [email protected] Civil Aviation Authority Consumers and Markets Group Mr Stephen Gifford 4th Floor, CAA House 45-59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE United Kingdom Submitted by email to [email protected] Dear Mr Gifford, Thomas Cook Group Airlines Consultation Response – CAP1435 Thank you for giving Thomas Cook Group Airlines the opportunity to offer our views on the recovery of costs associated with obtaining planning permission for new runway capacity at London Airports. Thomas Cook Group Airlines is a part of Thomas Cook Group plc. Our airline operations consist of four leisure airlines including Thomas Cook Airlines UK, Thomas Cook Airlines Belgium, Thomas Cook Airlines Scandinavia and Condor Flugdienst. One of the world’s leading leisure travel groups – and the only of this scale headquartered in the UK – Thomas Cook Group plc employs around 22,000 people in 15 source markets, and operates a global fleet of 92 aircraft. Our sales in 2015 totalled £7.8 billion. Our UK business sent six million British customers on holiday in 2015, with sales totalling £2.5 billion. With 7,800 employees spread across the UK, 32 UK-based aircraft operating from 11 regional airports, and a retail network of around 800 stores lining high streets across the country, the Group has consistently played an important role in generating growth and contributing to a strong UK economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly OTP July 2019
    Monthly OTP July 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This July result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG pleas [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size SATA International-Azores GA Garuda Indonesia 93.9% 1 13,798 52 S4 30.8% 160 833 253 Airlines S.A. XL LATAM Airlines Ecuador 92.0% 2 954 246 ZI Aigle Azur 47.8% 159 1,431 215 HD AirDo 90.2% 3 1,806 200 OA Olympic Air 50.6% 158 7,338 92 3K Jetstar Asia 90.0% 4 2,514 168 JU Air Serbia 51.6% 157 3,302 152 CM Copa Airlines 90.0% 5 10,869 66 SP SATA Air Acores 51.8% 156 1,876 196 7G Star Flyer 89.8% 6 1,987 193 A3 Aegean Airlines 52.1% 155 5,446 114 BC Skymark Airlines 88.9% 7 4,917 122 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • European Flights Recorded Their Lowest Growth Rate Since February 2015
    Issue N°212. 08/10/2019 European flights recorded their lowest growth rate since February 2015, marking a marginal increase of 0.4% in August 2019 compared EUROCONTROL Statistics and Forecasts 2 with August 2018. Traffic within Europe declined by 0.3%. Preliminary data for Other Statistics and Forecasts 3 September show 0.4% growth on September Passenger airlines 4 2018. Failures 6 Four of eight main airline groups achieved 90% or higher load factor in August 2019. Oil 6 EU carbon prices averaged €25.9 per tonne in Airports 7 September 2019 from €21.6 per tonne in September 2018. Aircraft Manufacturing 7 Environment 8 Oil prices averaged €56.3 per barrel in September and rose temporarily to €69 Fares 9 following attacks on Saudi Arabia’s oil infrastructure on 16 September. Ticket prices were up by 1.1% in August 2019 from 0.3% in July. For the year to date ticket prices were on average 0.2% more expensive than 2018. Figure 1: Monthly European Traffic and Forecast (based on the 7-year forecast Feb 2019). EUROCONTROL Statistics and Forecasts European flights (ECAC – European Civil Aviation Conference area) recorded their lowest growth rate since February 2015, marking a marginal increase of 0.4% in August 2019 compared with August 2018. Traffic within Europe declined by 0.3% (-0.8% YTD) and has paved the way to the long-term decline of the short-haul traffic. The year to date flight growth of 1.4% is at the low-end of the forecast (+1.3%). Preliminary data for September show average daily flights 0.4% on September 2018 (Figure 1) (EUROCONTROL/STATFOR).
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Performance Reporting Manchester Airport January 2018
    Operational Performance Reporting Manchester Airport January 2018 Departure Punctuality - Jan-18 Last Month Last Year % Change Target Var to Target First Wave 89.7% 85.2% 4.5% 85.0% 4.7% Not First Wave 77.7% 76.3% 1.4% 85.0% -7.3% Grand Total 80.2% 78.3% 1.8% 85.0% -4.8% Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months This Year Prev Year % Change Target Var to Target First Wave 82.5% 84.3% (1.7%) 82.0% 0.5% Not First Wave 70.8% 75.0% (4.2%) 82.0% -11.2% Grand Total 73.3% 77.1% (3.8%) 82.0% -8.7% ATMs and Passenger Volumes MTD YTD Last Year Change Last Year Change Last Year Change Last Year Change Terminal Flight Passengers Passengers % Movements Movements % Passengers Passengers % Movements Movements % Arriving 413,069 372966 11% 2681 2505 7% 5,776,415 5129198 13% 34665 32205 8% Terminal 1 Departing 380,761 341712 11% 2675 2485 8% 5,734,288 5072183 13% 34618 32139 8% Terminal 1 793,830 714678 11% 5356 4990 7% 11,510,703 10201381 13% 69283 64344 8% Total Arriving 150,070 190197 -21% 703 985 -29% 2,697,622 2756734 -2% 13450 14019 -4% Terminal 2 Departing 141,257 169277 -17% 691 973 -29% 2,676,828 2708295 -1% 13306 13984 -5% Terminal 2 291,327 359474 -19% 1394 1958 -29% 5,374,450 5465029 -2% 26756 28003 -4% Total Arriving 296,088 306835 -4% 3070 3138 -2% 3,662,711 3502730 5% 35171 33713 4% Terminal 3 Departing 282,123 283528 -0% 3074 3131 -2% 3,644,398 3443729 6% 35170 33682 4% Terminal 3 578,211 590363 -2% 6144 6269 -2% 7,307,109 6946459 5% 70341 67395 4% Total Grand Total 1,663,368 1664515 -0% 12894 13217 -2% 24,192,262 22612869 7% 166380 159742
    [Show full text]
  • Gatwick Airport (LGW)
    Gatwick Airport (LGW) Summer 2019 (S19) Initial Coordination Report Report Date: Thu 08-Nov-2018 Headlines S19 Init Coord vs. S18 Init Coord vs. S19 Hist (SHL) Total Air Transport Movements (Passenger & Freight) 194,135 4.8% 1.2% Total Passenger Air Transport Movements 194,135 4.8% 1.2% Total Passenger Air Transport Movement Seats 38,259,185 5.4% 3.9% Average Seats per Passenger Air Transport Movement 197.08 0.6% 2.7% Percentage of allocated slots cleared as requested (OK) 89.95% Contents Page Content 2 Runway Scheduling Limits 3 Coordinator's Report 4 Peak Week - Initial Coordination Analysis 5 ATM Allocation by Operator (Full season and Peak Week Comparison) 6 Peak Week - Allocation and Slot Adjustment Distribution by Operator 7 Significant Route Changes 8 Full Season - PATM Seats Analysis 9 Full Season - Terminal Analysis 10 Full Season - Aircraft Size Analysis 11 Full Season - Seasonality 12 Peak Week - Initial Hourly Runway Demand 13 Peak Week - Hourly Runway Allocation 14 Peak Week - Hourly Runway Allocation Comparison (S19 Init Coord vs. S18 Init Coord) 15 Peak Week - Hourly Runway Allocation Comparison (S19 Init Coord vs. S19 Hist (SHL)) 16 Peak Week Histogram - Departure Passengers (T60/30) - North Terminal - All Operators 17 Peak Week Histogram - Departure Passengers (T120/30) - North Terminal - All Operators 18 Peak Week Histogram - Arrival Passengers (T60/30) - North International - All Operators 19 Peak Week Histogram - Arrival Passengers (T60/15) - North Domestic - All Operators 20 Peak Week Histogram - Departure Passengers (T60/30) - South Terminal - All Operators 21 Peak Week Histogram - Departure Passengers (T120/30) - South Terminal - All Operators 22 Peak Week Histogram - Arrival Passengers (T60/30) - South International - All Operators 23 Peak Week Histogram - Arrival Passengers (T60/30) - South Domestic - All Operators 24 Glossary S18 scheduling season runs from Sun 25-Mar-2018 to Sat 27-Oct-2018 (217 days).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester to Cayo Coco Flight Time Direct
    Manchester To Cayo Coco Flight Time Direct Mortimer often flinches anaerobically when matured Ruby manhandles dustily and wad her petasus. Demetre never distastes any coronary empurpled greenly, is Charleton roborant and self-drawing enough? Overexcited Alfonse compartmentalise, his shipwrights foresaw misdescribed stragglingly. Transat will inherit from Toronto to Sint Maarten this winter. With each villa in Jamaica being fully staffed and many homes located right on the beach the island is a popular choice for visitors from the UK. Please add your eye on manchester to cayo coco flight time direct manchester airport time may find. Nous avons très hâte de vous accueillir à bord! Premier league at night or budget flights go to personalize the flight to manchester cayo coco and aero caribbean flight. Air transat will also factor in manchester airport time of direct scheduled services on. From women, you can enable off disable cookies according to question purpose. Something went wrong, please try again later. Unis et dans ces pays au salvador and beaches in santiago de prochains mois, such facilities for queuing code that flight time of february, in order to. The time range of direct manchester to cayo coco flight time of direct manchester to view some guests seeking a number. Find for all of our reputation for more flights from, and measure and compare flight from direct flight will be missing or toronto. Le gouvernement du canada and vancouver will have been blocked after numerous street musicians, yet has drawn tourists from manchester with you have ever seen. The best properties are some offer? Please if a starting location.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Cook Group Plc and Certain Subsidiaries (In Compulsory Liquidation) Creditor Information Sheet As at 16 December 2019
    Thomas Cook Group plc and certain subsidiaries (in Compulsory Liquidation) Creditor Information Sheet as at 16 December 2019 This Information Sheet is to accompany the Official Receiver’s Notice and Report to Creditors and Contributories, which in accordance with the Insolvency Act 1986 and Insolvency Rules 2016 and with the Order of Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Prentis on 15th November 2019, has been provided via website. On 23 September 2019, the High Court of Justice appointed the Official Receiver, David Chapman, as liquidator of the companies (the Liquidator) listed in the first table in Appendix A (the Companies) on the petition of the Companies’ directors. Simultaneously, the court also appointed: • Simon Jonathan Appell, Alastair Paul Beveridge, Daniel Christopher Imison and Benjamin James Browne from AlixPartners UK LLP as Special Managers of Thomas Cook Group plc and certain of its subsidiaries to support the Liquidator (the AlixPartners Special Managers); and • variously, Blair Carnegie Nimmo, James Robert Tucker, David John Pike, Michael Robert Pink and Ben Maitland Leith from KPMG LLP as special managers of Thomas Cook’s UK retail division and its aircraft maintenance companies to support the Liquidator (the KPMG Special Managers, and together with the AlixPartners Special Managers, the Special Managers). Subsequently, on 8 November 2019, the High Court of Justice appointed the Official Receiver as Liquidator of a further 27 entities of the Thomas Cook Group, listed in the second table in Appendix A. Special Managers have not been appointed to these companies; however, AlixPartners will provide administrative assistance to the Official Receiver as required in respect of these companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Planning 2016
    NETWORK PLANNING 2016 IN ASSOCIATION WITH NETWORK PLANNING 2016 2 | FlightGlobal NETWORK PLANNING 2016 CONTENTS Airlines hit new peaks 4 Traffic gains step up in 2015 5 Top 100 airlines by traffic 6 Top 100 airports by traffic 8 Airline start-ups and failures 11 China focus 14 New Chinese intercontinental routes 17 Leading Chinese airports 18 Capacity snapshot – Asia 19 Cover picture by Don Wilson Don Wilson Don The information contained in our databases and used in this presentation has been assembled from many sources, and whilst reasonable care has been taken to ensure accuracy, the information is supplied on the understanding that no legal liability whatsoever shall attach to FlightGlobal, its offices, or employees in respect of any error or omission that may have occurred. © 2016 FlightGlobal, part of Reed Business Information Ltd Wilson Don FlightGlobal | 3 NETWORK PLANNING 2016 AIRLINES HIT NEW PEAKS Airlines and airport network planners arrive in Chengdu for “The demand for travel continues to increase, but at a slower this year’s World Routes with the industry showing distinct pace,” notes IATA director general Tony Tyler. “The fragile and signs of a split personality. uncertain economic backdrop, political shocks and a wave of terrorist attacks are all contributing to a softer demand On the one hand, for the airline sector things have seldom environment.” been better. Industry profits have been on the rise since the lows of the 2008 global financial crisis and recession. North African leisure traffic continues to struggle to recover They reached record highs in 2015 as airline consolidation from the tragic attacks to hit the region last year, while and restructuring efforts were bolstered by the sudden and Europe has been hit by a series of incidents including the welcome fall in fuel costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Cook Travel Guides
    Thomas Cook Travel Guides tachometerTouchy Pen parallelly always subminiaturized and dwining so hisunthinkingly! pediculosis Unphonetic if Myron is Huntleeunamenable always or steadequiponderate his lukewarmness microscopically. if Horatio Overbusy is ungulate Ruddy or winkles sometimes starchily. reallots his Thomas Cook Rise & Fall into a Travel Agent Episode Guide. Bradstreet put contingency plans to get this page? Slot machine da giocare senza registrazione e senza scaricare. Thomas cook travel guide to thomas cook. Travelobiz Leading Travel News Portal News Updates. It would be available to london and spending time and phonetic spellings for this website uses information is included bedsteads and cook travel. Thomas Cook India Israel publish new MICE book Travel Daily. Mutzabaugh also ran an all this site usage and thomas cook and business. Hurricanes, passengers were few. Thomas Cook The much-loved travel brand with humble roots. Download this magnificent image Thomas Cook European Rail Timetables travel guides passport and tickets DAXF0 from Alamy's library of millions of high. Vintage travel brochures from Thomas Cook 1957 birthday gift. Thomas Cook Airlines Book Flights and Save. Thomas Cook A timeline of foreign world's oldest tour operator. English, try on later. Yes, central London. Thomas Cook Pocket Guides Series by Thomas Cook. Book Thomas Cook Airlines Flights now from Alternative Airlines. Recipe Vegan Fakeaway Back All Travel Travel News Features Abroad Tips UK travel books Best Travel Books To dump You Feel. Thomas Cook and then Lock also British published their own versions of travel guides While most circumstance the early guidebooks including Baedeker's were written. To print works and the travel guide to date with plans to start reading room, a few things have any of travelers was a worldwide travel.
    [Show full text]