DOCSLIB.ORG

GIS Design for in Situ Conservation of Rare and Endangered Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GIS Design for in Situ Conservation of Rare and Endangered Species Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 46, 2010 (Special Issue): S50–S53 GIS Design for in situ Conservation of Rare and Endangered Species R. HAUPTVOGEL1, R. KUNA2, P. ŠTRBA2 and P. HAUPTVOGEL1 1SARC – Research Institute of Plant Production Piešťany, 921 68 Pieštany; 2Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, , 949 74 Nitra, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Two projects: Conservation and use of genetic resources of non-traditional crops, related wild spe- cies and wild species for food and agriculture; and Characterization and evaluation of diversity of wheat and their wild relatives and utilising in breeding involve research into rare and endangered species in the territory of Slovakia. In Slovakia, many threatened and rare plant species occur. In this group of plants, Aegilops cylin- drica Host and Arctous alpina (L.) Nied are also listed. They are registered in the Red Data Book of Slovakia. To locate the occurrences of these species, we have used a GPS system. In this article, we illustrate using GIS (Geographic Information System) in plant conservation. Keywords: Aegilops; Arctous; endangered species; GIS; in situ; rare species GIS (Geographic Information System) is a system Moreover, the modern human in the present utilising both technologies and instruments which computer era is used to getting large quantities can make decision-making process easier. It follows of information in the shortest possible time. For from the name itself, as it is a system of information these reasons, the GIS products are being used technology, containing some geographic charac- more and more for geographic data processing. teristics. According to several authors (Guarino These products enable the manipulation of geo- et al. 1995; Tuček 1998), GIS can be defined as an graphic data and the presentation of results in organized system of computer hardware, software, digital or visual forms. The computer processing of and geographic data (filled databases) designed geographic data of course does not mean the end for the effective acquisition, storage, processing, of classical maps. Both forms of processing have management, analysing, and display of all forms their advantages and disadvantages (http://www. of geographic information. gis.sudolska.sk/). GIS stands for Geographic Information System, The main parts of a GIS are as follows (Haupt- and indicates a computer system oriented to vogel 2005): geographic data processing presented through – Data input, verification, and modification. maps. Before the start of the computer era, all – Data maintenance, acquisition, and manage- information of this type had been manually pro- ment. cessed. The resulting maps showed the results of – Manipulation of the data, data analysis, and the mutual effects of several data sets. In case of output. the need to interconnect the data in yet another In a very simplified way, we can say that within way, or to enter new data, the map had to be re- a GIS one has the possibility to add collected drawn. This procedure is very time and money informational data to various graphic objects intensive. into a digital map; and/or based on this data one S50 Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 46, 2010 (Special Issue): S50–S53 can make one’s own digital map, according to – Line, or line element – organized set of coordi- what is needed. Using a GIS, we can analyse and nates in a sequence (stream, contours). interpret various data which describes places, lo- – Polygons, or area element – closed pattern, calities, and objects on the Earth’s surface. These whose perimeter is created by the set of organ- so-called geospaces can be divided into three ized coordinates (settlement, forest, area). The territorial categories: large territorial or regional term topology for this data model is typically geospaces (territories of a state, region), local defined as the relationships between mutual geospaces (cadastre or an area of enterprise), and objects (neighbouring, crossing). micro geospaces (occurrence of an individual, a A raster data model is characterised by a set concrete locality). of points of the same size, regularly arranged in The result is the geospatial information in the rows and columns, similar to any other image in form of a map, visualisation, graph or other dia- a computer. The precision of a given model is grammatic output. When designing and creating determined by the size of a point, which has a such a system, it is necessary to understand that given characteristic colour. the data (in our case the database formed on the The basis of each GIS is a digital map created basis of passport data) forms a substantial part by many attributes. For spatial phenomena, divid- of the system. For this reason, the structure of ing into thematic areas (layers) is typical. Each graphic and descriptive data must be designed writable theme is defined as a set of elements of very carefully, with an emphasis on their mutual a given type, with a common attribute (forests, relationship. In general, the general task of a GIS settlemets, streams, hills). For vector and raster is to answer the question, ‘What is in a given lo- data, it is typical to arrange the information into cality, or where is the locality with the desired geographic layers (coverages). One can imagine characteristics’. It also can attempt to find changes these layers as transparent thematic layers overlay- in a locality over time, to investigate the spatial ing one another. The user decides which layers he background (i.e. to determine the effect of a factor wants to work with, which layers will be displayed, affecting a given population, and to answer the and which not. Such a system offers not only the question, ‘What happens if’?). classical possibilities of questions answered us- In the present rapidly developing technologi- ing a database, but also graphics on vector and cal world, GIS is one of the most dynamic and raster themes. developing information technologies. Especially A GIS offers the ability of geographic modelling in recent years, it has become an integral part and analysis for completely new themes, created on of the development of information systems in the basis of combined selections from the original areas such as: environment, geology, geography, graphical layers. In a GIS, there are contained a geophysics, geodesy, as well as banking, market- set of user tools for working with vector and raster ing, human demographic research, medicine, and data, which further enable the processing and biology. It is also used in the area of plant genetic analysis of the data in detail and in different ways; resources, in either local or the worldwide level using different methods. An integral part of the where, GIS starts to influence the mapping and work with a map is also a transparent presentation surveying of plant genetic resources, the produc- of the processed data. A geographic information tion of phytogeographic maps, and the analysis of system has the ability to integrate sources from populations of particular species in a given locality various areas of interest, and it therefore becomes (http://www.esri.com/). an effective and rational instrument for adminis- Geographic data in a GIS can be organized into trative actions in a given administration unit; at two basic data, specifically by the vector or raster the same time an impulse for further management model. These representations are reflective of (http://www.lesy.sk/). the different possibilities of processing, storage, analysis, and presentation of the data. The vector data model reflects real objects. They MATERIAL AND METHODS can be divided into three basic types of elements in space in a selected coordinate system. During the monitoring and collecting of diaspore, – Points, or point element – characterized by we have collected other passport data, together coordinates in space (tree, plant). with samples of plant genetic resources. These S51 Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 46, 2010 (Special Issue): S50–S53 were processed as a database in the form of tables. The geographical position of localities were re- The Microsoft Excel program was used; the sets of corded by means of GPS (Global Position System) data and passport data was stored in .xls format from the Garmin Company GPS60CS, with an and then exported in .dbf format (because this accuracy of 5 to 10 m. Processing of phytogeo- format was suitable for our needs). graphic thematic maps, and layers on the basis The passport portion of the database was proc- of the databases created, was accomplished using essed according to the following collected data: ArcGIS 9.1 software from the ESRI Company. We ACRONYM – acronym of collecting expedition, have used the digitally processed maps from ESRI, COLL_DATE – date of collecting, LOCALITY_N especially European global maps. – serial number of locality, ACCESSION – serial number of sample, GENUS – botanical name of genus, CROP_CODE – code of crop, MATERIAL RESULTS – type of collected material (seeds or vegetative parts), LOCALITY – name of locality or data of Within the monitoring and collecting of plant grower, HABITAT – place of occurrence (descrip- data, and using the methodogy of geographic infor- tion of locality), EXPOSITION – exposition in mation systems, we processed the data of selected terrain, SLOPE – slope, LATITUDE – latitude, rare and endangered species from monitoring in LONGITUDE – longitude, ALTITUDE – altitude, the Slovak Republic. The monitoring was focused HOLDER – holder of sample, NOTICE – notes. on Aegilops cylindrica Host (Figure 1) and Arctous Based on the results processed this way we can alpina (L.) Nied. ask questions for the GIS to answer: Aegilops cylindrica Host, jointed goatgrass, – What is on this locality? Poaceae family is a critically endangered species, – Where are the localities with the desired cha- according to the IUCN category. Jointed goatgrass racteristics? is a submediterranean and subcontinental species – What has been changed since …? with a Euro-Asian distribution. The centre of occur- – What spatial background exists? rence is in South-Eastern Europe and Asia Minor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Bear in Eurasian Plant Names
    Kolosova et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:14 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0132-9 REVIEW Open Access The bear in Eurasian plant names: motivations and models Valeria Kolosova1*, Ingvar Svanberg2, Raivo Kalle3, Lisa Strecker4,Ayşe Mine Gençler Özkan5, Andrea Pieroni6, Kevin Cianfaglione7, Zsolt Molnár8, Nora Papp9, Łukasz Łuczaj10, Dessislava Dimitrova11, Daiva Šeškauskaitė12, Jonathan Roper13, Avni Hajdari14 and Renata Sõukand3 Abstract Ethnolinguistic studies are important for understanding an ethnic group’s ideas on the world, expressed in its language. Comparing corresponding aspects of such knowledge might help clarify problems of origin for certain concepts and words, e.g. whether they form common heritage, have an independent origin, are borrowings, or calques. The current study was conducted on the material in Slavonic, Baltic, Germanic, Romance, Finno-Ugrian, Turkic and Albanian languages. The bear was chosen as being a large, dangerous animal, important in traditional culture, whose name is widely reflected in folk plant names. The phytonyms for comparison were mostly obtained from dictionaries and other publications, and supplemented with data from databases, the co-authors’ field data, and archival sources (dialect and folklore materials). More than 1200 phytonym use records (combinations of a local name and a meaning) for 364 plant and fungal taxa were recorded to help find out the reasoning behind bear-nomination in various languages, as well as differences and similarities between the patterns among them. Among the most common taxa with bear-related phytonyms were Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng., Heracleum sphondylium L., Acanthus mollis L., and Allium ursinum L., with Latin loan translation contributing a high proportion of the phytonyms.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    The Ecology and Conservation of California's Maritime Chaparral Evolution and distribution of Archtostaphylos Tom Parker Maritime Chaparral No real definition has stabilized for maritime chaparral. There is Understanding Maritime a continuum of chaparral types distributed along the Chaparral Post-fire at Ft.Ord coast of California. Using Arctostaphylos as the road to and from confusion Summer fog is the one characteristic that links these chaparral types together. Pfeiffer Rock ? Origin within the Ericaceae • The Arbutoideae is a subfamily of the Ericaceae, a widespread and diverse family. The family itself dates beyond 100 MYBP, The recent Arctostaphylos (manzanitas) radiation in and some estimates California has resulted in a confusing group for most place it older. people. As a principal dominant of maritime chaparral, one question is where did all these manzanitas come from? One theory proposed relationships within the family based upon their fungal root mutualists, or mycorrhizae. Using Suggesting single origins for the various mycorrhizal molecular types within the family, the Arbutoideae comes out as sequence one of the oldest lineages. data, these relationships within the Ericaceae were confirmed. Elkhorn Slough Coastal Training Program Workshop January 17, 2003 1 The Ecology and Conservation of California's Maritime Chaparral Evolution and distribution of Archtostaphylos Tom Parker The subfamily Arbutoideae contains 6 What are the relationships among the genera within the Arbutoideae? genera. These genera are found in the northern hemisphere, with most species confined to North America. • Arbutus ~12 species • Arctostaphylos ~60-90 species • Arctous 2 species • Comarostaphylis ~16 species • Ornithostaphylos 1 species • Xylococcus 1 species Molecular sequences suggest Arbutus as the basal genus for the subfamily, and Arbutus Arctostaphylos as the most derived.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants on the North Slope | the North Slope Borough
    8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough CALENDAR CONTACT Harry K. Brower Jr. , Mayor COMMON PLANTS ON THE NORTH SLOPE Home » Departments » Wildlife Management » Other Topics of Interest » Common Plants on the North Slope Plants are an important subsistence resource for residents across the North Slope. This page provides information on some of the common plants found on the North Slope of Alaska, including plants not used for subsistence. Plant names (common, scientific and Iñupiaq) are provided as well as descriptions, pictures and traditional uses. The resources used for identification are listed here as well as other resources for information on plants. List of Common Plants and others of the North Slope PDF Version Photo Identification of these Common Plants Unknowns - Got any ideas? Please send them to us! Plant Identification and Other Resources Thes pages are a work in progress. If you see any misinformation, misidentifications, or have pictures to add, please contact us. Information on the Iñupiaq names and traditional uses of these plants is especially welcomed. Check out "Unknown" pictures at bottom of page. Thanks! DISCLAIMER: This guide includes traditional uses of plants and other vegetation. The information is not intended to replace the advice of a physician or be used as a guide for self- medication. Neither the author nor the North Slope Borough claims that information in this guide will cure any illness. Just as prescription medicines can have different effects on www.north-slope.org/departments/wildlife-management/other-topics/common-plants-north-slope 1/3 8/17/2020 Common Plants on the North Slope | The North Slope Borough individuals, so too can plants.
    [Show full text]
  • D: Rare Plants Species and Wildlife Habitats
    Appendix D – Rare Plant Species and Wildlife Habitats Rare Plant Species and Wildlife Habitats The habitat profiles created for the Wildlife Action Plan have been developed for the purpose of describing the full range of habitats that support New Hampshire’s wildlife species. However, these habitats can also serve as useful units for identifying rare plant habitats. This appendix provides lists of rare plant species known to be associated with each WAP habitat type. In accordance with the Native Plant Protection Act (NH RSA 217-A), the New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau (NHB) maintains a list of the state’s rarest and most imperiled plant species. This list has been developed in cooperation with researchers, conservation organizations, and knowledgeable amateur botanists. Plant locations have been obtained from sources including herbarium specimens, personal contacts, the scientific literature, and through extensive field research. The list is updated regularly to reflect changes in information. For each habitat, a list of associated rare plant species is presented. These rare plant – habitat associations are based on known occurrences of each species in New Hampshire. It is possible that an individual species will have different habitat associations elsewhere in its range. For more information on dominant and characteristic plant species for each habitat, refer to the individual habitat profiles. For each species, the following information is provided: Scientific name: The primary reference used is: Haines, Arthur. 2011. Flora Novae Angliae: A Manual for the Identification of Native and Naturalized Higher Vascular Plants of New England. Yale University Press. New Haven and London. Common name: Many plant species have more than one common name, and some common names are applied to multiple species.
    [Show full text]
  • Loamy Flood Plains (131B 100)
    Loamy Frozen Slopes, High Elevation (M131B_415) Ecoregion Classification Section: Kuskokwim Mountains (M131B) Subsection(s): Alpine Low Mountains (M131B.M1A) Boreal Low Mountains (M131B.M1) Physiographic Features RV Range Elevation (meters): 488 197 to 632 Slope Gradient (percent): 10 4 to 16 Aspect (clockwise direction): non-influencing Landform: hummocks on mountains; nonsorted circles on mountains Landform Positions: backslopes; shoulders; summits Frequency Flooding: None Ponding: None Climatic Features RV Range Annual Precipitation (millimeters): 465 356 to 549 Annual Air Temperature (°C): -2.8 -2.9 to -2.0 Frost Free Days: 60 50 to 70 Soil Features Parent Materials: mossy organic material and/or woody organic material over silty cryoturbate over gravelly cryoturbate derived from schist silty eolian deposits over gravelly cryoturbate derived from schist Rooting Depth (cm): RV: 36 Range: 28 to 45 Soil Layers and Properties within Representative Rooting Depth: Layers are described from the surface downward. If more than one texture is listed, the predominant texture is listed first. AWC = available water capacity. CEC = cation exchange capacity. Thickness Texture Permeability AWC pH Effective CEC CEC (cm) (cm/cm) (me/100g) (me/100g) 1 to 20 peat; slightly decomposed plant moderately rapid .34 3.9 to 4.6 30 material 2 to 14 silt loam, muck; silt loam moderate .26 4.4 to 5.3 12 to 15 2 to 25 very channery silt loam; very moderately rapid .12 4.4 to 5.7 5 to 6 6 channery loam Restrictive Features: bedrock (paralithic) at 88 to 150 cm or more permafrost at 42 to 150 cm strongly contrasting textural stratification at 1 to 34 cm Water Table (May to September): 0 to 120 cm Drainage Class: moderately well drained to poorly drained Vegetation Features Common Vegetation Types: Vegetation Type Ecological Status Mixed ericaceous shrub-shrub birch scrub Climax plant community Ecological Status-Transition Description: A single plant community with mixed ericaceous shrub-shrub birch scrub is identified on this site.
    [Show full text]
  • FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords
    FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords 29,958 entries as KEYWORD (PARENT) Descriptive phrase AB (CANADA) Alberta ABEESC (PLANTS) Abelmoschus esculentus, okra ABEGRA (PLANTS) Abelia × grandiflora [chinensis × uniflora], glossy abelia ABERT'S SQUIRREL (MAMMALS) Sciurus alberti ABERT'S TOWHEE (BIRDS) Pipilo aberti ABIABI (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella abietina, abietinella moss ABIALB (PLANTS) Abies alba, European silver fir ABIAMA (PLANTS) Abies amabilis, Pacific silver fir ABIBAL (PLANTS) Abies balsamea, balsam fir ABIBIF (PLANTS) Abies bifolia, subalpine fir ABIBRA (PLANTS) Abies bracteata, bristlecone fir ABICON (PLANTS) Abies concolor, white fir ABICONC (ABICON) Abies concolor var. concolor, white fir ABICONL (ABICON) Abies concolor var. lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIDUR (PLANTS) Abies durangensis, Coahuila fir ABIES SPP. (PLANTS) firs ABIETINELLA SPP. (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella spp., mosses ABIFIR (PLANTS) Abies firma, Japanese fir ABIFRA (PLANTS) Abies fraseri, Fraser fir ABIGRA (PLANTS) Abies grandis, grand fir ABIHOL (PLANTS) Abies holophylla, Manchurian fir ABIHOM (PLANTS) Abies homolepis, Nikko fir ABILAS (PLANTS) Abies lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILASA (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica, corkbark fir ABILASB (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. bifolia, subalpine fir ABILASL (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILOW (PLANTS) Abies lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIMAG (PLANTS) Abies magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGM (ABIMAG) Abies magnifica var. magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGS (ABIMAG) Abies
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Natural Areas Program Maine Endangered and Threatened Plant List
    Maine Natural Areas Program Maine Endangered and Threatened Plant List Global State Federal Scientific Name Common Name State Rank Rank Status Status Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian Maidenhair Fern S1 G5? E Adlumia fungosa Allegheny Vine S1 G4 E Agalinis neoscotica Nova Scotia False‐foxglove S1 G4 T Agalinis purpurea Large‐purple False Foxglove S1 G5 E Agrostis mertensii Boreal Bentgrass S2 G5 T Amelanchier nantucketensis Nantucket Shadbush S2 G3Q T Amerorchis rotundifolia Small Round‐leaved Orchis S2 G5 T Anemone multifida Cut‐leaved Anemone S1 G5 T Anthoxanthum moncola † Alpine Sweet Grass S1 G5 T Arctous alpina † Alpine Bearberry S1 G5 T Arnica lanceolata Hairy Arnica S2 G3 T Asarum canadense Wild Ginger S1S2 G5 T Asplenium viride † Green Spleenwort S1 G4 E Astragalus robbinsii var. minor Robbins' Milk‐vetch S1 G5T5 E Bartonia paniculata Screwstem S1 G5 T Benthamidia florida † Flowering Dogwood S1 G5 E Betula glandulosa Tundra Dwarf Birch S1 G5 E Betula minor Dwarf White Birch S1 G4Q E Bistorta vivipara † Alpine Bistort S1 G5 E Boechera laevigata † Smooth Rockcress S1 G5 T Boechera missouriensis † Missouri Rockcress S1 G5?Q T Bolboschoenus novae‐angliae Marsh Bulrush S1 G5 E Botrychium lunaria Moonwort S1 G5 E Botrychium oneidense Blunt‐lobed grapefern SU G4Q T Botrychium pallidum Pale Moonwort S1 G3 E Bromus kalmii Wild Chess S1 G5 E Calamagrostis pickeringii Pickering's Reed Grass S1 G4 T Calamagrostis stricta ssp. inexpansa Northern Reed Grass S1 G5T5 E Calamagrostis stricta ssp. stricta Neglected Reed Grass S2 G5T5 T Calystegia spithamaea Upright Bindweed S2 G4G5 T Cardamine bellidifolia Alpine Bitter‐cress S1 G5 E Cardamine concatenata Cut‐leaved Toothwort S1 G5 E Cardamine longii Long's Bitter‐cress S2 G3 T Carex adusta Swarthy Sedge S2 G5 E Carex atherodes Awned Sedge S1 G5 T Carex bicknellii Bicknell's Sedge S1 G5 E Carex eburnea Ebony Sedge S1 G5 E Carex granularis Meadow Sedge S1 G5 T Carex laxiculmis Spreading Sedge S2 G5 E Carex media † Intermediate Sedge S1 G5T5? E Carex muehlenbergii var.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree/Shrub Species Code List As
    SppCode SpeciesName NewSpeciesName CommonName AB1 Abelia species abelia ABCH Abelia chinensis Abelia ABGR4 Abelia x grandiflora Glossy abelia DOHE2 Aberia gardneri Dovyalis hebecarpa Ceylon gooseberry AB Abies species fir ABAL Abies alba Silver fir ABAM Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir ABBA Abies balsamea Balsam fir ABBI Abies balsamea ssp. lasiocarpa Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABBI Abies balsamea var. fallax Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABPH Abies balsamea var. phanerolepis Abies x phanerolepis Balsam fir ABBI Abies bifolia Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABBO Abies borisii-regis Bulgarian fir; macedonian fir ABBR Abies bracteata Bristlecone fir ABCO Abies concolor White fir ABLO Abies concolor var. lowiana Sierra white fir ABFR Abies fraseri Fraser fir ABGR Abies grandis Grand fir ABHO Abies holophylla Manchurian fir ABHO2 Abies homolepis Japanese fir ABLA Abies lasiocarpa Subalpine fir ABBI Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABLO Abies lowiana Abies concolor var. lowiana Sierra white fir ABMA Abies magnifica California red fir ABSH Abies magnifica var. shastensis Abies x shastensis Shasta red fir ABPR Abies nobilis Abies procera Noble fir ABNO Abies nordmanniana Nordman fir ABPI Abies pinsapo Abeto de espaÑa ABPR Abies procera Noble fir ABBI Abies subalpina Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABBR Abies venusta Abies bracteata Bristlecone fir ABPH Abies x phanerolepis Balsam fir ABSH Abies x shastensis Shasta red fir AB3 Abutilon species Indian mallow ABBE Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier's indian mallow ABBE Abutilon californicum Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier's indian mallow ABER Abutilon eremitopetalum Hiddenpetal indian mallow ABGR3 Abutilon grandifolium Hairy indian mallow ABME2 Abutilon menziesii Ko'oloa 'ula ABPA Abutilon palmeri Palmer's indian mallow ABSA2 Abutilon sandwicense Greenflower indian mallow ABSA2 Abutilon sandwicense var.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetational Relationships with Air Mass Frequencies: Boreal Forest and Tundra
    Vegetational Relationships With Air Mass Frequencies: Boreal Forest and Tundra JAMES A. LARSEN1 ABSTRACT. Recent studies have demonstrated a striking correspondence between air mass frequencies and theposition of the North American forest border. Analysis by principal component techniques demonstrates that relative abundance of certain species in a number of kinds of plant communities found in central northern Canada is strongly correlated with the frequencies of given air mass types. The conclusion is reached that distribution and frequency of occurrence of at least a number of species found in the plant communities of that region are markedly influenced by climate. In addition, the resultcan be interpreted as evidence supporting the continuum theory of species distribution in vegetation of the region. RfiSUMfi. Rapports entrela végétation et les fréquences des masses d'air, pour la forêt boréale et Za toundra. De récentes études ont démontré une correspondance frappante entre les fréquences des masses d'air et la position de la limite de la forêt en Amérique du Nord. Une analyse démontre que l'abondance relative de certaines espèces dans un bon nombre desortes de communautés végétales que l'on retrouve dansle centre duCanada nordique est fortement liée aux fréquences de types donnés de masses d'air. On en arrive à la conclusion que. la distribution et la frb quence d'au moins un certain nombre d'espèces présentes dans les communautés végétales de cette région sont fortement influencées par le climat. De plus, on peut interpréter ce résultat comme une preuve 8 l'appui de la théorie du continuum de distribution des espèces de lavégétation de larégion.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for the Improvement of Arbutus Unedo L. (Strawberry Tree): in Vitro Propagation, Mycorrhization and Diversity Analysis
    Maria Filomena Figueiredo Nazaré Gomes Strategies for the improvement of Arbutus unedo L. (strawberry tree): in vitro propagation, mycorrhization and diversity analysis 2011 Departamento de Ciências da Vida Universidade de Coimbra Maria Filomena Figueiredo Nazaré Gomes Orientador: Prof. Doutor Jorge Manuel Pataca Leal Canhoto Strategies for the improvement of Arbutus unedo L. (strawberry tree): in vitro propagation, mycorrhization and diversity analysis 2011 Dissertação apresentada à Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade de Coimbra para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Biologia, especialidade de Fisiologia. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My first thanks must go to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Jorge Canhoto who helped me, for his encouragement, scientific support and careful review of this work. To Dr. Rita Costa, Dr. Helena Machado and Dr. Maria Margarida Ribeiro, a very special thanks for their scientific support, encouragement and careful review of Chapters 4 and 5. To Dr. António Portugal, Dr. Maria Teresa Gonçalves and Dr. Nuno Mesquita I am very grateful for their scientific support. To Prof. Justina Franco, Dr. Conceição Costa and to the team work of Laboratory of Plant Science and Chemistry from ESAC, I am very grateful for the fruit analyses performed. To Dr. Ludovina Lopes, Dr. Isabel Evaristo and Dr. Elisa Figueiredo, I express my gratitude for their support, scientific advises and encouragement. To Prof. Dr. Fernando Páscoa, I would like to thank for his support, encouragement and friendship always stated. I would also like to express my gratitude to my colleagues José Maia, Fernando Casau, David Rodrigues, Célia Ferreira, Carmo Magalhães, and Cristina Cameira for their support, encouragement and friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey of Selected Sites in the White Mountains National Recreation Area and the Steese National Conservation Area, Yukon-Tanana Uplands, Alaska
    ~ i U. S. Department of the Interior BLM-Alaska Technical Report 53 " Bureau of Land Management BLM/AK/ST-03/012+6700+028 July 2003 Alaska State Office 222 West 7th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Botanical Survey of Selected Sites in the White Mountains National Recreation Area and the Steese National Conservation Area, Yukon-Tanana Uplands, Alaska Carolyn Parker, Alan R. Batten, James D. Herriges, Jr. Cover Photo Eritrichium splendens. This beautiful dwarf forget-me-not was growing on limestone rock outcrops near Mount Schwatka in the White Mountains National Recreation Area (photo by Carolyn Parker). Authors Carolyn L Parker and Alan R Batten are research associates with the University of Alaska Museum Herbarium. James D. Herriges, Jr. is a wildlife biologist with the Bureau of Land Management, Northern Field Office in Fairbanks, Alaska. Disclaimer The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recom­ mendation for use by the federal government. The BLM Mission The Bureau of Land Management sustains the health, diversity and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Technical Reports Technical Reports issued by the Bureau of Land Management-Alaska present the results of research, studies, investigations, literature searches, testing, or similiar endeavors on a variety of scientific and technical subjects. The results presented are final, or are a summation and analysis of data at an intermediate point in a long-term research project, and have received objective review by peers in the author's field. The reports are available while supplies last from BLM External Affairs, 222 West 7th Avenue #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513, telephone (907) 271-3318; and from the Juneau Minerals Information Center, 100 Savikko Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Official NH Rare Plants List
    New Hampshire Official Rare Plants List – Effective 01/01/2020 Table 312.1 Federally Listed Rare Plant Species Scientific Name (with authority) Common Name Federal Status Astragalus robbinsii (Oakes) Gray var. jesupii Egglest. & Jesup's milk-vetch Endangered Sheldon Isotria medeoloides (Pursh) Raf. small whorled pogonia Threatened Scirpus ancistrochaetus Schuyler northeastern bulrush Endangered New Hampshire Official Rare Plants List – Effective 01/01/2020 Table 312.2 State Listed Endangered Plant Species Scientific Name (with authority) Common Name Acalypha virginica L. Virginia three-seeded-Mercury Adlumia fungosa (Ait.) Greene ex B.S.P. Allegheny-vine Aletris farinosa L. white colic-root Allium canadense L. var. canadense meadow garlic Allium schoenoprasum L. wild chives Allium tricoccum Ait. var. burdickii Hanes narrow-leaf wild leek Amerorchis rotundifolia (Banks ex Pursh) Hultén round-leaved orchid Andersonglossum virginianum (L.) J.I. Cohen ssp. boreale wild hound's-tongue (Fern.) A. Haines [ined.] Anemone cylindrica Gray long-headed windflower Arabis pycnocarpa M. Hopkins var. pycnocarpa hairy eared-rockcress Arctous alpina (L.) Nied. alpine bearberry Arethusa bulbosa L. dragon's-mouth Argentina anserina (L.) Rydb. common silverweed Arisaema dracontium (L.) Schott green-dragon Aristida tuberculosa Nutt. seaside threeawn Arnica lanceolata Nutt. ssp. lanceolata lance-leaved arnica Artemisia campestris L. ssp. caudata (Michx.) Hall & field wormwood Clements Asclepias purpurascens L. purple milkweed Asclepias quadrifolia Jacq. four-leaved milkweed Asclepias tuberosa L. ssp. tuberosa butterfly milkweed Asplenium rhizophyllum L. walking spleenwort Astragalus alpinus L. var. brunetianus Fern. alpine milk-vetch Astragalus robbinsii (Oakes) Gray var. jesupii Egglest. & Jesup's milk-vetch Sheldon Atriplex subspicata (Nutt.) Rydb. saline orache Aureolaria virginica (L.) Pennell downy false foxglove Barbarea orthoceras Ledeb.
    [Show full text]