The Ingenious Mr.Henry Care, Restoration Publicist Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ingenious Mr.Henry Care, Restoration Publicist Pdf, Epub, Ebook THE INGENIOUS MR.HENRY CARE, RESTORATION PUBLICIST PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Lois G. Schwoerer | 376 pages | 15 Jan 2002 | JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780801867279 | English | Baltimore, MD, United States The Ingenious Mr.Henry Care, Restoration Publicist PDF Book Lois G. Mr Henry Care deserves to be rescued from the shadows, he lived an exciting life at a very exciting time, the book is teeming with notable characters whom the author bring to life with skill and care. It explains how guns became available to men, women, and children of all social standings, how subjects responded to guns, how firearms changed their lives, how the government reacted to civilians possessing guns, and the role of guns in the settlement of the Revolution of Sorry, there was a problem saving your cookie preferences. Total Pageviews. New York: , Schwoerer has identified a novel angle of approach to a well-studied period that will require reconsideration of familiar issues. At the same time, each is careful to detail the idioms of "the constitution" and "the law" that so often disguised that radicalism and its periodic excursions into political violence. The Complete First Season. Associated Subjects. From to he penned the savage anti-Catholic periodical, the Weekly Pacquet of Advice from Rome , which Schwoerer goes so far as to describe as "the most important popular history of the seventeenth century in England" p. Tulp was also known as Claes Pietersz or Pieterszoon and Tulpius. Get to Know Us. I have not found evidence of a connection between Sloane and the other two. Read the latest issue. I thank Dr. Google Scholar. Publication Timeline. London's First Spin Campbell R. Gibson for his personal communication of January 24, Stephen D. Unlimited One-Day Delivery and more. She is now working on a study of John Locke's midwifery notes. He re-emerged in as the leading Protestant writer publishing in support of James II's policy of religious toleration. Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. Add a Comment. Description: Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Debus Berkeley: , 33—48; Harold J. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Add links. Elizabeth A. For medicine in the eighteenth-century English universities, see Gascoigne, Cambridge and The History of the University of Oxford , eds. Each writer has, in effect, been commissioned to produce a book which is not quite a textbook and yet not quite a monograph either. Michigan State University Department of History. Newer Post Older Post Home. The Ingenious Mr.Henry Care, Restoration Publicist Writer Schwoerer's own sympathies are always clear, which does sometimes mean that she applies subtly varying standards in her judgments. There are many accounts of the battle between the physicians and the apothecaries. Lois G. The standing army controversy in England : by Lois G Schwoerer Book 5 editions published between and in English and held by 6 WorldCat member libraries worldwide. In , the Society of Apothecaries limited membership to those working as apothecaries. Lois Schwoerer has taken an intrinsically interesting topic and provided a great deal of fascinating and deeply researched information stretching back over five centuries. Citation: Andrew Barclay. Finally, in an essay responding to all of the preceeding contributions, Professor Schwoerer offers her own view and summary of that "wicked and turbulent" era. New York: , chapter 1, 1— His discussion about government control of the press is particularly strong, although, unsurprisingly, not as definitive as the more detailed chapter on the subject in Schwoerer's book. By the end of the book the distinct impression remains that Schwoerer is still uncomfortable with Care's support for James II, however provisional that support might have been. Few beyond the ranks of the specialists on the print culture of the reign of Charles II would have heard of him before Schwoerer decided to write a whole monograph about him. A significant aspect was the intention to employ Archibald Campbell, 9th Earl of Argyll for a military rebellion in Scotland. Approved third parties also use these tools in connection with our display of ads. Professor Schwoerer, one of the leading political historians of the late Stuart period, has produced a fine study of a Restoration writer, while Professor Keeble, a distinguished literary scholar, has produced a textbook on the Restoration dominated by politics. In , George II conferred 32 Cambridge MD degrees on physicians and an additional 5 degrees on members of the nobility. Several overriding conclusions emerge. Lady Rachel Russell, : one of the best of women by Lois G Schwoerer Book 2 editions published in in English and held by 24 WorldCat member libraries worldwide. London: , 49— There was some crossover between the religious and the political groups; some Dissenters, for example, voted Tory. Cite chapter How to cite? Related Books. Download as PDF Printable version. James had been expressing support for religious toleration for at least as long as Care. Albert M. Rumbold was introduced to West's group by John Wildman , but when the plot was discovered, both had distanced themselves, Wildman by refusing to finance Rumbold in the purchase of arms and Rumbold by losing his earlier enthusiasm. Gowing, Domestic Dangers , —4; V. Schouwburg der Ruspen, Wormen, Maden en Vliegende Dierkens daaruit voortkommende Amsterdam: ; Leipzig: The theater of caterpillars, worms, grubs and little flying animals. Schwoerer also makes large claims for Care's intellectual impact. By exploring his life and work, this text offers insight into how the non-elite affected politics. Schwoerer is inclined to accept the theory that during these years he was also the author of the newssheet Poor Robin's Intelligence p. Hayward , 10 Google Scholar. According to Matthews see n. Anne was possibly the widow of the printer G. Lady Rachel Russell : "one of the best of women" by Lois G Schwoerer Book 15 editions published between and in English and Undetermined and held by WorldCat member libraries worldwide. One suspects however that this series format had rather more to do with half-baked editorial thinking. Its format resembled closely the official organ of information, the London Gazette , but its content was rather different. Thomas Walcot and Robert Ferguson had accompanied Shaftesbury to the Netherlands in his self-imposed exile of November ENW EndNote. Being a help to justicies as well as a guide to constables London, detailing legal safeguards of individual rights, starting with the iconic Magna Charta, and running to several editions, which grew in size with each republication;". The Ingenious Mr.Henry Care, Restoration Publicist Reviews He sees the turmoil as a competition for Royal and Court patronage. If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. Skip to main content. See also chapter 1, n. Related Identities. De Volder appears often in Jonathan I. A new edition in listed Nicholas Culpeper as a co-translator. Loudon believes that Rose did not effect any major change in the profession because it merely ratified the de facto situation. See also Allen G. Radical as well as conservative ideas survived. The assassination plot centred on a group that was convened in — by Robert West of the Middle Temple , a Green Ribbon Club member: [3] it is now often called the Rye House cabal. Schwoerer American historian. A lively print culture assured the circulation and importance of political and religious ideas. Gun culture in early modern England by Lois G Schwoerer 9 editions published in in English and held by WorldCat member libraries worldwide "This volume identifies, describes, and analyses early modern England's gun culture. Hayward , 10 Google Scholar. Schwoerer has written a book that places Henry Care firmly into his historical context and shows the enormous range of his writing and how influential it really was. Other Formats: Hardcover , Paperback. See also Roger L. Guns were featured in the Bill of Rights, but it did not, as some scholars aver, grant individual Protestants a right to bear arms. Spurr, England in the s Oxford, , —9. Richard Greaves cites as proof that there was a plot in , the armed rebellions of the fugitive Earl of Argyll and Charles' Protestant illegitimate son, James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth. In late March a new serial publication hit the streets of London. David L. DeLacy discusses the medical views of religious sectarians during the English Civil War and the postwar effort to stamp out sectarianism, which affected the profession through the end of the eighteenth century. European History. Cook argues that the membership of the Society is difficult to place politically. The overt violence of the Civil War was gone the violence of the rhetoric remained and became refined and amplified in a series of savage press and pamphlet wars. New York: , chapter 1, 1— Gowing, Domestic Dangers , —4; V. Schwoerer has written a gripping and insightful biography of one of the central characters in the violently sectarian politics of Restoration London. For Harvey, see below, chapter 3. Popular reaction to the Tories' reactive excesses, sometimes known as the "Stuart Revenge" though that term is contested, led to the discontent expressed decisively in the Glorious Revolution of The Ingenious Mr.Henry Care, Restoration Publicist Read Online On the other hand, unlike Spurr and Rose, he uses only sources in print. John Fothergill of London, — , eds. What Care had actually said was that James's support for toleration was "no sudden or occasional Overture to serve a present turn, but the well-weigh'd and long-confirmed Result of his Royal Judgment, which as he had many years ago declared on sundry occasions. Located first in London, the gun industry brought the city new sounds, smells, street names, shops, sights, and communities of gun workers, many of whom were immigrants.
Recommended publications
  • Algernon Sidney on Public Right
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 10 Issue 2 Article 3 1987 Algernon Sidney on Public Right Edward Dumbauld Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the European Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Edward Dumbauld, Algernon Sidney on Public Right, 10 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 317 (1988). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol10/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALGERNON SIDNEY ON PUBLIC RIGHT Hon. Edward Dumbauld* In response to criticisms that the Declaration of Independence lacked originality,' its author Thomas Jefferson explained that the political purpose and object of that document was: not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the sub- ject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet cop- ied from any particular and previous writing,' it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Other Voices: Dissenting Women Mary Franklin (d. 1711) was the wife of the Reverend Robert Franklin (1630–1703), one of some two thousand Nonconformist ministers who were “ejected” from their pulpits and their livings on Black Bartholomew’s Day,1 August 24, 1662, following the Restoration of Charles II (1630–1685). In May 1660, Charles returned from exile in Europe, beginning the Restoration of the monarchy. He was crowned on April 23, 1661. Though for many English subjects the Restoration was a joyous occasion, for the Dissenters,2 and especially for ministers and their relations, these became times that tried their souls. Mary Franklin wrote a narrative of her experi- ence of these times, taking up, late in life, one of her husband’s incomplete sermon notebooks, turning it upside down, and using its blank pages for her purposes.3 She wrote about her life as a minister’s wife and her family’s suffering under a govern- ment that exacted religious conformity to the Church of England as a measure of loyalty to the crown. She also recorded the triumph of God’s providences through it all. She did not seek publication of her brief, detailed, and moving testimony but rather seems to have kept the notebook within her family until her death, after 1. The name Black Bartholomew’s Day harkens back to a day of infamy for the Protestant godly, St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre, August 24, 1572, when tens of thousands of French Huguenots (Calvinists) were slaughtered by the Catholic King Charles IX. See N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Levellers' Conception of Legitimate Authority
    Araucaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política y Humanidades ISSN: 1575-6823 ISSN: 2340-2199 [email protected] Universidad de Sevilla España The Levellers’ Conception of Legitimate Authority Ostrensky, Eunice The Levellers’ Conception of Legitimate Authority Araucaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política y Humanidades, vol. 20, no. 39, 2018 Universidad de Sevilla, España Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28264625008 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative e Levellers’ Conception of Legitimate Authority A Concepção de Autoridade Legítima dos Levellers Eunice Ostrensky [email protected] Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil Abstract: is article examines the Levellers’ doctrine of legitimate authority, by showing how it emerged as a critique of theories of absolute sovereignty. For the Levellers, any arbitrary power is tyrannical, insofar as it reduces human beings to an unnatural condition. Legitimate authority is necessarily founded on the people, who creates the constitutional order and remains the locus of political power. e Levellers also contend that parliamentary representation is not the only mechanism by which the people may acquire a political being; rather the people outside Parliament are the collective agent able to transform and control institutions and policies. In this sense, the Levellers hold that a highly participative community should exert sovereignty, and that decentralized government is a means to achieve that goal. Araucaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Keywords: Limited Sovereignty, Constitution, People, Law, Rights. Filosofía, Política y Humanidades, vol. Resumo: Este artigo analisa como os Levellers desenvolveram uma doutrina da 20, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry and Robert Danvers
    32 THE BAPTIST QUARTERLY will help to build bridges between the W.C.C. and the Lausanne/Pattaya approach, and between Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox. It was a privilege to attend such a gathering, to meet such a wide range of Christian experience from all over the world, and to be the recipient of so much first-class theological thinking. I do recommend, particularly, if readers can get hold of it, Bishop John V. Taylor's address on "The Church witnesses to the Kingdom" and also Kosuke Koyama's address on "The Crucified Christ challenges Human Power" - these were undoubtedly the two finest pieces of thinking put before the conference. Raymond Fung's address "Good News to the Poor - the case for a missionary movement" is also very good value. Extracts from these addresses, together with other reports of the conference can be found in the latest issue of the International Review of Mission, Vol. LXIX (275) July 1980. Issues of I.R.M. from about mid-1978 onwards give further background to the Melbourne conference. I returned home from Melbourne with a deepened awareness of the richness and variety of the people of God, and with a renewed confidence in the power and relevance of the gospel. P. CLEMENTS-JEWERY, Minister, Wigan Baptist Church. The Tangled Careers of Two Stuart Radicals: Henry and Robert Danvers IN the decades after the restoration of the Stuart monarchy in 1660, most Baptists adjusted themselves to the new regime by practising quiescent obedience in political matters and worshipping as best they could in conventicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Perspectives on the Execution of Sir Thomas Armstrong (1684): Tory Triumphalism and Dutch Distaste
    Two Perspectives on the Execution of Sir Thomas Armstrong (1684): Tory Triumphalism and Dutch Distaste James Drabble Abstract This essay analyses two accounts of the execution of Sir Thomas Armstrong, which took place at Tyburn on 20 June 1684: the broadside ballad, The Traytors Last Farewel, published within days of his death, and the etching, Thomas Armstrong, Binnen Londen, gehangen en gevierendeelt, created by Jan Luyken in 1698. The study finds two different interpretations of the execution: the ballad reflecting Tory triumphalism at its height, four years before its deflation with the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and the etching displaying Dutch distaste for the betrayal of their cherished right of refuge. London, June 20. This day Sir Thomas Armstrong was Executed, being drawn upon a Sledge to Tyburn, and then Hanged and Quartered.1 This stark notice in the London Gazette of June 23 1684 announced what was later to be officially acknowledged as an egregious miscarriage of justice. Armstrong had been implicated in the Rye House plot to kill Charles II and his brother, the duke of York (later, James II), in 1683 but was later exonerated by parliament. His case evidently caught the public’s imagination; one of a number of commercially-produced, competing accounts published just days after the execution reports that his demise attracted crowds from all classes ‘that the like hath not been of late observed in any Execution of this Nature’.2 However, this study wishes to look beyond the prosaic, journalistic accounts of Armstrong’s death to consider two contrasting artistic responses to the event.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCKE STUDIES Vol
    LOCKE STUDIES Vol. 17 https://doi.org/10.5206/ls.2017.879 | ISSN: 2561-925X Originally published: 2017 Published online: 01 JANUARY 2019 © Locke Studies, 2017 Shaftesbury, Locke, and their Revolutionary Letter? D.N. DELUNA (UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON) A corrigendum for this article was published in vol. 18 of Locke Studies available here. Scholars are kindly asked to reference the corrigendum only and not this version of the article. For more information about this article: see this article’s webpage. Locke Studies is published by The John Locke Society. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and shared under the original license. SHAFTESBURY, LOCKE, AND THEIR REVOLUTIONARY LETTER? D. N. DELUNA I knew of none besides the Duke [of Monmouth] who had an interest in the minds & affections of the people to draw them to Arms for asserting their Rights & Liberties Robert Ferguson (1683)1 §1 Late in 1675, the anonymous Letter from a Person of Quality, to His Friend in the Country was condemned in the House of Lords as a ‘dangerous Book’, indeed a ‘lying, scandalous, and seditious Book’. The Peers ordered it to be burned by the public hangman, and opened an investigation designed to discover its author, printer, and publisher.2 About this search and its success in tracking the author(s) down, very little is known. But as J. R. Milton and Philip Milton, who included the pamphlet in their Clarendon edition of John Locke’s Essay Concerning Toleration and his Other Writings on Law and Politics, 1667–1683, have pointed out, ‘no one has ever doubted that it was written by someone in Shaftesbury’s circle and for Shaftesbury’s purposes.3 1 Robert Ferguson, ‘Concerning the Rye House business’, printed in James Ferguson, Robert Ferguson, the Plotter; or, The Secret of the Rye-House Conspiracy and the Story of a Strange Career (Edinburgh, 1887), 420.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Ralph Stewart IRSS 33 (2008) 37 Gilbert Burnet’s Politics Ralph Stewart * In July, 1663, Archibald Johnston of Wariston was hanged at the market cross of Edinburgh, officially for the ‘high treason’ of accepting office in Cromwell’s government. Although many people in Scotland had held similar positions, and assisted Cromwell in other ways, only three were executed. (The others were the Earl of Argyle, and Wariston’s friend James Guthrie, a minister.) Wariston’s real crime was to have spearheaded the Scottish revolt against Charles I in the late 1630s, which began with bitter opposition to Charles’ plans to make the Presbyterian Scottish church more like the English one, and more amenable to his wishes. Wariston was co-composer of the Scottish Covenant which challenged the King’s authority, and Clerk of the unofficial parliamentary committee (made up of noblemen, lairds, merchants and ministers) which had subscribed the Covenant. When the King’s decrees on the Kirk were read out by a herald at Edinburgh’s market cross, in the traditional manner, supporters of the Covenant would oblige the herald to stay while Wariston read out a ‘Protestation’ asking for remedy of grievances and a ‘free [Kirk] Assembly and Parliament’.1 In insisting on the execu- tion and quartering of this arch-Covenanter (his head was stuck on the Netherbow Port, beside James Guthrie’s) Charles II may have been motivated partly by personal resentment - though Wariston had no significant part in Charles I’s death - but was also eliminating a symbol of resistance to the King’s authority.
    [Show full text]
  • JSR 3-2.Indd
    ariel hessayon goldsmiths, university of london Early Modern Communism The Diggers and Community of Goods Freedom is the man that will turn the world upside downe, therefore no wonder he hath enemies. —Gerrard Winstanley, A Watch-Word to the City of London and the Armie (1649), preface I. Positioning the Diggers within a Communist Tradition Since their rediscovery in the nineteenth century—first by Liberal, Social- ist, and Marxist historians and then by Protestant nonconformists—the English Diggers of 1649–50 have been successively appropriated; their image refashioned in the service of new political doctrines that have sought legitimacy partly through emphasizing supposed ideological antecedents. In a previous article I demonstrated that recent attempts to incorporate the Diggers within a constructed Green heritage are unconvincing and that at worst these emerging “Green narratives” are insensitive to historical context.1 Similarly, here I want to show how, either through lack of understanding the finer points of Protestant theology or deliberate distortion, most explanations of the Diggers’ implementation of the doctrine of community of goods have been misleading. Journal for the Study of Radicalism, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2009, pp. 1–50. issn 1930-1189. © 2009 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. All rights reserved. 1 2 Ariel Hessayon Although the term “Communism” is anachronistic in an early modern context—the Chartist Goodwyn Barmby apparently coined it in 1840—Fried- rich Engels nonetheless used it in his study of Th e Peasant War in Germany (summer 1850). Engels, at that time a journalist and political activist with republican sympathies, linked the revolutionary struggle of the German people in 1848 with the defeated uprising of their forebears.2 Moreover, since the 1890s a number of scholars writing in the wake of the emergence of British socialism and burgeoning trade union movement have used the word to describe an ideology that burst forth during the English Revolu- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Cromwelliana
    Cromwelliana The Journal of The Cromwell Association 2017 The Cromwell Association President: Professor PETER GAUNT, PhD, FRHistS Vice Presidents: PAT BARNES Rt Hon FRANK DOBSON, PC Rt Hon STEPHEN DORRELL, PC Dr PATRICK LITTLE, PhD, FRHistS Professor JOHN MORRILL, DPhil, FBA, FRHistS Rt Hon the LORD NASEBY, PC Dr STEPHEN K. ROBERTS, PhD, FSA, FRHistS Professor BLAIR WORDEN, FBA Chairman: JOHN GOLDSMITH Honorary Secretary: JOHN NEWLAND Honorary Treasurer: GEOFFREY BUSH Membership Officer PAUL ROBBINS The Cromwell Association was formed in 1937 and is a registered charity (reg no. 1132954). The purpose of the Association is to advance the education of the public in both the life and legacy of Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658), politician, soldier and statesman, and the wider history of the seventeenth century. The Association seeks to progress its aims in the following ways: campaigns for the preservation and conservation of buildings and sites relevant to Cromwell commissions, on behalf of the Association, or in collaboration with others, plaques, panels and monuments at sites associated with Cromwell supports the Cromwell Museum and the Cromwell Collection in Huntingdon provides, within the competence of the Association, advice to the media on all matters relating to the period encourages interest in the period in all phases of formal education by the publication of reading lists, information and teachers’ guidance publishes news and information about the period, including an annual journal and regular newsletters organises an annual service, day schools, conferences, lectures, exhibitions and other educational events provides a web-based resource for researchers in the period including school students, genealogists and interested parties offers, from time to time grants, awards and prizes to individuals and organisations working towards the objectives stated above.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title “Poetick Rage” to Rage of Party: English Political Verse, 1678-1685 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/67k814zg Author McLaughlin, Leanna Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE “Poetick Rage” to Rage of Party: English Political Verse, 1678-1685 A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Leanna Hope McLaughlin December 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Thomas Cogswell, Chairperson Dr. Randolph Head Dr. Patricia Fumerton Copyright by Leanna Hope McLaughlin 2018 The Dissertation of Leanna Hope McLaughlin is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While saving the best for last may seem like a great idea, the acknowledgements are actually some of the harder words I have ever written. How does one put into words the boundless gratitude to the people and organizations that have made this book possible? Still, I must try. This dissertation simply would not have been possible without the patience, encouragement, and guidance of Dr. Thomas Cogswell. In addition to pointing me in the direction of the most delightful and scandalous sources in early modern England, Tom’s help and advice helped me craft the larger argument and his laughter at the content fueled my drive. Thanks to Tom I will eternally move “onward and upward.” I owe Dr. Randolph Head a great deal for his unending support, his uncanny ability to help me see the narrative flow and the bigger picture, and his dogmatic attention to questions of historical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/148274 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-10 and may be subject to change. NATHANIEL THOMPSON TORY PRINTER, BALLAD MONGER AND PROPAGANDIST G.M. Peerbooms NATHANIEL THOMPSON Promotor: Prof. T.A. Birrell NATHANIEL THOMPSON TORY PRINTER, BALLAD MONGER AND PROPAGANDIST Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de letteren aan de Katholieke Universiteit te Nijmegen, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr. J.H.G.I. Giesbers volgens besluit van het College van Dekanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 28 juni 1983 des namiddags te 2 uur precies door GERARD MARIA PEERBOOMS geboren te Bom Sneldruk Boulevard Enschede ISBN 90-9000482-3 С. 19Θ3 G.M.Peerbooms,Instituut Engels-Amerikaans Katholieke Universiteit,Erasmusplein 1«Nijmegen. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the authorities and staffs of the following libraries and record offices for permission to examine books and manuscripts in their possession, for their readiness to answer my queries and to provide microfilms: the British Library, London; the Corporation of London Record Office; Farm Street Church Library, London; the Greater London Record Office; the Guildhall Library, London; Heythrop College Library, London; the House of Lords Record Office, London; Lambeth Palace Library, London; the Public Record Office, London; St. Bride's Printing Library, London; the Stationers' Company, London; Westminster Public Library, London, the Bodleian Library, Oxford; Christ Church College Library, All Souls Collecte Library, Merton College Library, New College Library, Worcester College Library, Oxford; Chetam's Library, Manchester; the National Library of Scotland, Edinburgh; the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University; the Houghton Library, Harvard University; the H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Jury's Constitutional Role, Originalism, and Judicial
    The Jury's Constitutional Role, Originalism, and Judicial Usurpation © by Tom Glass* I. Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 3 II. The Originalist Method ....................................................................................................... 4 III. The Evidence of Support for Jury Power by the Founders ............................................. 7 A. The Political and Intellectual Atmosphere of the Founding Era........................................... 7 1. Liberty and Justice for All ................................................................................................. 7 2. Natural Law Concepts Underlie Jury Power ..................................................................... 8 B. Defining The Jury ............................................................................................................... 15 C. The History of the Jury as the Founders Knew It ............................................................... 19 1. John Lilburne – Father of Most Criminal Procedural Rights .......................................... 19 2. William Penn, William Mead, and Bushell’s Case.......................................................... 22 3. The Restoration, the Seven Bishops’ Case, and the Glorious Revolution ....................... 27 4. Zenger’s Case – Press Freedom Protected by a Law-Judging Jury................................. 31 5. The Battle over Libel in Eighteenth Century England....................................................
    [Show full text]