DOCSLIB.ORG

October 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
October 2017 Sacramento International Airport Passenger Statistics October 2017 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % +/(-) 2017/18 2016/17 % +/(-) 2017 2016 % +/(-) Enplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 23,070 23,554 (2.1%) 96,537 107,778 (10.4%) 229,808 258,538 (11.1%) Horizon Air 6,490 9,729 (33.3%) 33,196 39,720 (16.4%) 87,879 95,001 (7.5%) American Airlines 49,244 43,304 13.7% 207,849 192,107 8.2% 496,036 437,439 13.4% Delta Airlines 35,762 32,898 8.7% 140,738 129,415 8.7% 300,736 281,583 6.8% Hawaiian Airlines 7,491 7,435 0.8% 28,913 28,770 0.5% 72,385 71,140 1.8% Jet Blue 11,385 11,630 (2.1%) 55,544 51,124 8.6% 131,615 119,509 10.1% Seaport - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - 13 (100.0%) Southwest 260,285 234,283 11.1% 997,456 906,949 10.0% 2,318,861 2,171,621 6.8% United Airlines 42,267 35,453 19.2% 154,488 128,866 19.9% 329,349 281,567 17.0% 435,994 398,286 9.5% 1,714,721 1,584,729 8.2% 3,966,669 3,716,411 6.7% Commuters Alaska/Skywest 7,169 - 0.0% 31,009 - 0.0% 55,572 - 0.0% American/Skywest/Compass Eagle 9,972 9,408 6.0% 33,966 40,488 (16.1%) 78,829 97,542 (19.2%) Delta/Skywest/Compass 19,680 15,893 23.8% 83,515 69,593 20.0% 187,910 176,147 6.7% United/Skywest Express 11,052 12,532 (11.8%) 45,523 52,813 (13.8%) 116,390 129,072 (9.8%) 47,873 37,833 26.5% 194,013 162,894 19.1% 438,701 402,761 8.9% Charter 64 - 0.0% 277 - 0.0% 616 136 352.9% 64 - 0.0% 277 - 0.0% 616 136 352.9% International AeroMexico 4,850 6,159 (21.3%) 16,947 25,794 (34.3%) 46,462 52,746 (11.9%) Volaris 3,405 3,040 12.0% 15,628 14,605 7.0% 40,484 35,172 15.1% 8,255 9,199 (10.3%) 32,575 40,399 (19.4%) 86,946 87,918 (1.1%) Total Enplaned 492,186 445,318 10.5% 1,941,586 1,788,022 8.6% 4,492,932 4,207,226 6.8% Deplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 24,920 23,949 4.1% 101,567 112,077 (9.4%) 230,914 259,705 (11.1%) Horizon Air 6,612 9,625 (31.3%) 34,347 39,246 (12.5%) 89,222 94,117 (5.2%) American Airlines 49,089 42,229 16.2% 208,086 190,236 9.4% 492,313 430,998 14.2% Delta Airlines 36,406 33,663 8.1% 141,673 131,442 7.8% 301,759 286,930 5.2% Hawaiian Airlines 7,607 7,685 (1.0%) 29,346 29,292 0.2% 73,695 72,389 1.8% Jet Blue 11,077 11,630 (4.8%) 54,751 50,935 7.5% 129,485 117,684 10.0% Seaport - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - 34 (100.0%) Southwest 262,316 237,013 10.7% 1,000,108 909,691 9.9% 2,320,175 2,173,418 6.8% United Airlines 44,628 37,375 19.4% 154,380 130,903 17.9% 333,603 282,709 18.0% 442,655 403,169 9.8% 1,724,258 1,593,822 8.2% 3,971,166 3,717,984 6.8% Commuters Alaska/Skywest 6,682 - 0.0% 29,386 - 0.0% 53,538 - 0.0% American/Skywest/Compass Eagle 10,152 9,583 5.9% 34,860 42,345 (17.7%) 80,510 101,621 (20.8%) Delta/Skywest/Compass 20,056 16,558 21.1% 85,501 69,517 23.0% 188,760 174,031 8.5% United/Skywest Express 10,748 12,213 (12.0%) 46,590 51,211 (9.0%) 113,340 123,144 (8.0%) 47,638 38,354 24.2% 196,337 163,073 20.4% 436,148 398,796 9.4% Charter 62 - 0.0% 269 - 0.0% 701 136 415.4% 62 - 0.0% 269 - 0.0% 701 136 415.4% International AeroMexico 3,898 5,555 (29.8%) 17,079 27,221 (37.3%) 48,276 55,361 (12.8%) Volaris 3,198 2,919 9.6% 15,937 15,010 6.2% 42,101 37,803 11.4% 7,096 8,474 (16.3%) 33,016 42,231 (21.8%) 90,377 93,164 (3.0%) Total Deplaned 497,451 449,997 10.5% 1,953,880 1,799,126 8.6% 4,498,392 4,210,080 6.8% ENPLANED AND DEPLANED PASSENGERS 989,637 895,315 10.5% 3,895,466 3,587,148 8.6% 8,991,324 8,417,306 6.8% 1/22/2018 Sacramento County Airport System Summary of Activity October 2017 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % + / ( - ) 2017/18 2016/17 % + / ( - ) 2017 2016 % +/(-) Sacramento International Airport Passengers Enplaned 492,186 445,318 10.5% 1,941,586 1,788,022 8.6% 4,492,932 4,207,226 6.8% Deplaned 497,451 449,997 10.5% 1,953,880 1,799,126 8.6% 4,498,392 4,210,080 6.8% 989,637 895,315 10.5% 3,895,466 3,587,148 8.6% 8,991,324 8,417,306 6.8% Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) 587,818 520,422 13.0% 2,311,051 2,091,576 10.5% 5,309,692 4,947,775 7.3% # of Landings 4,785 4,268 12.1% 19,022 17,272 10.1% 43,996 41,390 6.3% Airmail (Pounds) On 843,657 664,935 26.9% 2,616,034 2,461,151 6.3% 5,723,636 4,385,214 30.5% Off 640,752 659,167 (2.8%) 2,368,362 2,302,353 2.9% 5,093,222 3,942,929 29.2% 1,484,409 1,324,102 12.1% 4,984,396 4,763,504 4.6% 10,816,858 8,328,143 29.9% Freight (Pounds) On 5,619,030 5,936,330 (5.3%) 20,968,532 22,786,267 (8.0%) 56,839,152 56,979,336 (0.2%) Off 5,844,746 5,536,758 5.6% 21,315,348 22,212,241 (4.0%) 53,683,764 56,768,347 (5.4%) 11,463,776 11,473,088 (0.1%) 42,283,880 44,998,508 (6.0%) 110,522,916 113,747,683 (2.8%) Aircraft Operations Air Carrier 9,011 7,779 15.8% 35,392 30,654 15.5% 81,276 73,778 10.2% Air Taxi 882 963 (8.4%) 3,622 4,651 (22.1%) 9,071 10,598 (14.4%) General Aviation 646 633 2.1% 2,872 2,596 10.6% 6,466 6,731 (3.9%) Military 206 67 207.5% 888 656 35.4% 1,454 1,884 (22.8%) 10,745 9,442 13.8% 42,774 38,557 10.9% 98,267 92,991 5.7% Mather Airport Passengers Enplaned 14 1 1300.0% 50 55 (9.1%) 117 122 (4.1%) Deplaned 15 6 150.0% 66 55 20.0% 127 120 5.8% 29 7 314.3% 116 110 5.5% 244 242 0.8% Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) 38,513 26,229 46.8% 149,391 110,075 35.7% 333,411 276,925 20.4% # of Landings 301 232 29.7% 1,137 967 17.6% 2,693 2,501 7.7% Freight (Pounds) On 5,218,361 3,751,547 39.1% 20,378,811 16,472,250 23.7% 47,049,174 40,474,636 16.2% Off 6,454,737 4,616,258 39.8% 24,596,878 19,385,177 26.9% 55,655,877 46,839,201 18.8% 11,673,098 8,367,805 39.5% 44,975,689 35,857,427 25.4% 102,705,051 87,313,837 17.6% Aircraft Operations Air Carrier 632 413 53.0% 2,431 1,740 39.7% 5,395 4,520 19.4% Air Taxi 1,648 1,389 18.6% 5,433 5,532 (1.8%) 13,237 12,586 5.2% General Aviation 6,523 4,843 34.7% 22,637 21,446 5.6% 50,585 50,310 0.5% Military 2,069 1,558 32.8% 7,503 7,804 (3.9%) 16,693 19,474 (14.3%) 10,872 8,203 32.5% 38,004 36,522 4.1% 85,910 86,890 (1.1%) Sacramento Executive Airport Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - 16 (100.0%) # of Landings - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - 1 (100.0%) Freight (Pounds) On - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Off - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - 772 (100.0%) - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - 772 (100.0%) Aircraft Operations Air Carrier - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Air Taxi 262 147 78.2% 965 753 28.2% 2,304 1,708 34.9% General Aviation 11,083 8,650 28.1% 39,040 35,700 9.4% 86,646 81,194 6.7% Military 14 74 (81.1%) 102 247 (58.7%) 415 552 (24.8%) 11,359 8,871 28.0% 40,107 36,700 9.3% 89,365 83,454 7.1% 1/22/2018 Sacramento International Airport Passenger Statistics Prior 12 months Current Year Prior Year Year over Year Change Enplaned Deplaned Enplaned Deplaned Enplaned % Difference Deplaned % Difference November 2016 429,585 423,945 400,150 400,164 29,435 7.4% 23,781 5.9% December 2016 429,231 418,727 408,283 402,372 20,948 5.1% 16,355 4.1% January 2017 371,974 377,352 355,570 359,304 16,404 4.6% 18,048 5.0% February 2017 347,689 347,864 342,807 345,053 4,882 1.4% 2,811 0.8% March 2017 432,606 429,524 413,096 407,800 19,510 4.7% 21,724 5.3% April 2017 433,623 434,386 397,014 398,326 36,609 9.2% 36,060 9.1% May 2017 466,269 470,354 437,615 441,637 28,654 6.5% 28,717 6.5% June 2017 499,185 485,032 473,102 458,834 26,083 5.5% 26,198 5.7% July 2017 492,727 497,980 465,824 469,659 26,903 5.8% 28,321 6.0% August 2017 485,310 493,541 449,243 458,908 36,067 8.0% 34,633 7.5% September 2017 471,363 464,908 427,637 420,562 43,726 10.2% 44,346 10.5% October 2017 492,186 497,451 445,318 449,997 46,868 10.5% 47,454 10.5% 5,351,748 5,341,064 5,015,659 5,012,616 336,089 6.7% 328,448 6.6% Total Enplaned Passengers by Month 525,000 475,000 2013 425,000 2014 2015 375,000 2016 2017 325,000 2017 Est.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Here Applicants and Recruiters Can • Read All the Magazine Issues of Aero Crew News
    September 2016 Aero Crew News Your Source for Pilot Hiring Information and More... Contract Talks Moving Benefits Exclusive Hiring Briefing Aviator Bulletins Upgraded Training Facilities, Partnerships with Schools CPP, internship and more! Fitness Corner Calories in Your Drink, Beware You deserve your dream job. ExpressJet o ers everything that you’re looking for when starting your career. Make the smart choice for your future and fly with the best at ExpressJet. Great Pay o $37-40/hr first year pay o Guaranteed profit sharing program o Leading healthcare benefits Path to the Majors o United Career Path Program o JetBlue University and Advanced Gateways o More pilots hired by the majors each year than any other regional Industry-leading Training o ATP CTP o ered for free (always!) as part of paid training o In-house training tailored to each pilot gives you the best rate of success o Advanced Qualification Program (AQP) Learn more about why ExpressJet is the smart choice for your future at flysmartchoice.com Apply today at expressjet.com/apply You deserve your dream job. ExpressJet o ers everything that you’re looking for when starting your career. Make the smart choice for your future and fly with the best at ExpressJet. Great Pay o $37-40/hr first year pay o Guaranteed profit sharing program Aero Crew Solutions Launches New Website Aero Crew Solutions is proud to announce the complete • The ability for companies to publish their latest o Leading healthcare benefits redesign of our website. Our goal is to continue the job news on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada-California, USA November 2014
    Nevada-California, USA November 2014 While the end of 2014 was approaching, I still had about ten vacation days left. Therefore I decided to spent these on a spotting trip. I teamed up with fellow reader EC and we agreed that the south-western part of the United States would be a great place to visit. The chances of finding nice airplanes and good weather in this part of the world are rather high, even at the end of November. We decided to spend three days in Las Vegas and then drive to southern California, where we would spend almost a full week. The primary focus would be on photographing airliners and fire fighting aircraft, but some number crunching was done as well (although most logs below are not complete). Please note that all mm’s mentioned apply to a 1.5 crop factor camera and all aircraft are only noted once per airport. On the morning of Wednesday 19 November Eddy and I met at Schiphol at approximately 8 AM. There we learned that our flight to Houston was delayed for several hours. Fortunately United Airlines rebooked us on flight UA908 to Chicago. 19 November 2014 Schiphol EHAM G-FBEI Embraer 195LR Flybe LZ-FBE Airbus A320-200 Bulgaria Air N14121 Boeing 757-200 United Airlines N652UA Boeing 767-300ER United Airlines YU-APJ Airbus A319-100 Air Serbia A few planes were noted before boarding the 22-year-old Boeing 767. The flight to Chicago was uneventful in my opinion. However some other passengers complained about the cabin temperature and as a result all passengers received an 100 USD online voucher, to be spent on United Airlines flights with in the next year.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel Consumer Report Is a Monthly Product of the Department of Transportation's Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
    U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report Issued: MARCH 2002 Includes data for the following periods: Flight Delays January 2002 12 Months Ending January 2002 Mishandled Baggage January 2002 Oversales 4th Quarter 2001 January-December 2001 Consumer Complaints January 2002 (Includes Disability Complaints) Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings http://www.dot.gov/airconsumer/ TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page INTRODUCTION ......................…2 Flight Delays Explanation ......................…3 Mishandled Baggage Table 1 ......................…4 Explanation ....................…..17 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking ....................…..18 Operations Arriving On Time, by Carrier Table 1A ......................…5 Oversales Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Explanation ....................…..19 Operations Arriving On Time and Carrier Rank, by Month, Quarter, and Data Base to Date Ranking--Quarter ....................…..20 Table 2 ......................…6 Ranking--YTD ....................…..21 Number of Reported Flight Arrivals and Per- centage Arriving On Time, by Carrier and Airport Consumer Complaints Table 3 ......................…8 Explanation ....................…..22 Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Complaint Tables 1-5 ..............23 Operations Arriving On Time, by Airport and Summary, Complaint Categories, U.S. Airlines, Time of Day Incident Date, and Companies Other Than Table 4 .....................…9 U.S. Airlines Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Rankings,
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, Supplemental Schedules for the Year Ended June 30, 2003 and Independent Auditors' Report
    State of Hawaii Department of Transportation - Airports Division (An Enterprise Fund of the State of Hawaii) Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, Supplemental Schedules for the Year Ended June 30, 2003 and Independent Auditors' Report STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AIRPORTS DIVISION (An Enterprise Fund of the State Of Hawaii) TABLE OF CONTENTS JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2002 Page Independent Auditors' Report 1-2 Management's Discussion and Analysis 3-14 Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002: Statements of Net Assets 15-17 Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets 18-19 Statements of Cash Flows 20-22 Notes to Financial Statements 23-44 Supplementary Information - Schedules as of and for the Year Ended June 30, 2003: 1 - Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses Other Than Depreciation 45 2 - Calculations of Net Revenues and Taxes and Debt Service Requirement 46-47 3 - Summary of Debt Service Requirements to Maturity 48 4 - Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - Airports System Revenue Bonds 49 5 - Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - General Obligation Bonds 50 6 - Airports System Charges - Fiscal Year 1995-97 Lease Extension 51-53 7 - Approved Maximum Revenue Landing Weights and Airport Landing Fees - Signatory Airlines 54 8 - Approved Maximum Revenue Landing Weights and Airport Landing Fees - Nonsignatory Airlines 55 Deloitte & Touche LLP Suite 1200 1132 Bishop Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813· 2870 Tel: (808) 543-0700 Fax: (808) 526-0225 www.us.deloitte.com Deloitte &Touche INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Director Department of Transportation State of Hawaii: We have audited the statements of net assets of the Airports Division, Department ofTransportation, State of Hawaii (an enterprise fund of the State of Hawaii) (Airports Division) as of June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of revenues, expenses and changes in net assets, and of cash flows for the years then ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Fountain
    61 far from solution. The difficulties of acquiring land and financing for this costly project appeared overwhelming. Mean- while, fuel tankers continued to make their noisy take-offs over Honolulu. The airport hoped there would be a technical development that would eliminate the need for this flight path. Highlights July 1, 1962 The Hawaii Visitors Information Program was established to welcome passengers at Honolulu International Airport and Honolulu Harbor, to encourage travel to the Neighbor Islands, and to provide information and other help to airport and harbor visitors. As of June 30, 1963, the staff of the HVIP consisted of 33 full-time and nine part-time employees. July 10, 1962 The widening of Taxiway X and restoration of P Road with a crossing over a new drainage ditch was com- pleted at a cost of $113,463.82. July 22, 1962 The Empress of Lima, a four-engine Britannia jet turboprop, crashed at 11:19 p.m. and burned while making an approach to Runway 8 on the Hickam Field portion of the airport. Twenty-seven persons were killed and 13 survived. It was the worst civil air carrier accident in the Islands’ history. The Air Force Fire Department acted promptly to minimize loss of life. Personnel of the Airport, Navy and City and County assisted in fighting the fire, maintaining order, and pro- viding ambulances and other services. The crash dramatically showed the need for continued cooperation between the Air Force and the airport. Several meetings were held after the crash and a number of suggestions developed for further improvement of the pattern for teamwork.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Iv Regionals/Commuters
    CHAPTER IV REGIONALS/COMMUTERS For purposes of the Federal Aviation REVIEW OF 20032 Administration (FAA) forecasts, air carriers that are included as part of the regional/commuter airline industry meet three criteria. First, a The results for the regional/commuter industry for regional/commuter carrier flies a majority of their 2003 reflect the continuation of a trend that started available seat miles (ASMs) using aircraft having with the events of September 11th and have been 70 seats or less. Secondly, the service provided by drawn out by the Iraq War and Severe Acute these carriers is primarily regularly scheduled Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). These “shocks” to passenger service. Thirdly, the primary mission of the system have led to the large air carriers posting the carrier is to provide connecting service for its losses in passengers for 3 years running. The code-share partners. losses often reflect diversions in traffic to the regional/commuter carriers. These carriers During 2003, 75 reporting regional/commuter recorded double-digit growth in both capacity and airlines met this definition. Monthly traffic data for traffic for the second time in as many years. History 10 of these carriers was compiled from the has demonstrated that the regional/commuter Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Form 41 industry endures periods of uncertainty better than and T-100 filings. Traffic for the remaining the larger air carriers. During the oil embargo of 65 carriers was compiled solely from T-100 filings. 1 1973, the recession in 1990, and the Gulf War in Prior to fiscal year 2003, 10 regionals/commuters 1991, the regional/commuter industry consistently reported on DOT Form 41 while 65 smaller outperformed the larger air carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters Philip E
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 67 | Issue 2 Article 3 2002 Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters Philip E. Crowther Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Philip E. Crowther, Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters, 67 J. Air L. & Com. 241 (2002) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol67/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. TAXATION OF FRACTIONAL PROGRAMS: "FLYING OVER UNCHARTED WATERS" PHILIP E. CROWTHER* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 243 A. GENERAL DESIGN OF THE PROGRAM ............. 243 1. The Basic Agreements ........................ 243 2. General Principles ........................... 244 3. Operation of the Program..................... 246 4. Economic Analysis of the Program............. 249 5. Tax Analysis of the Program ................. 251 II. FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION TAX .............. 251 A. THE GENERAL RULES ........................... 251 1. The Transportation Tax ..................... 251 2. Taxation of Use of Own Aircraft .............. 256 3. Taxation of Joint Ownership Agreement ....... 261 4. Taxation of Dry Lease Exchange .............. 262 B. CHARACTERIZATION OF FRACTIONAL PROGRAMS.. 264 1. The FractionalCompany Rulings ............. 264 2. Executive Jet Aviation ........................ 267 3. Critique..................................... 270 C. CONSEQUENCES AND REMAINING ISSUES ......... 278 III. INCOME TAX ISSUES ............................. 279 A. THE GENERAL RULES ........................... 279 1. The Income Tax ............................. 279 * Attorney, Law Offices of Phil Crowther, a Kansas legal practice limited to aviation business and tax law. From 1986 to 1999, he was the Tax Manager and Assistant Treasurer at Cessna Aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions Needed to Improve Airline Customer Service and Minimize Long, On-Board Delays
    Before the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Aviation United States House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:00 p.m. EDT Actions Needed To Wednesday September 26, 2007 Improve Airline CC-2007-099 Customer Service and Minimize Long, On-Board Delays Statement of The Honorable Calvin L. Scovel III Inspector General U.S. Department of Transportation Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: We are pleased to be here today to discuss airline customer service issues and the actions needed from the Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), airlines, and airports to minimize long, on-board delays. This hearing is both timely and important given the record-breaking flight delays, cancellations, diversions, and on-board tarmac delays that air travelers have already experienced this year. Based on the first 7 months of the year: • Nearly 28 percent of flights were delayed, cancelled, or diverted—with airlines’ on-time performance at the lowest percentage (72 percent) recorded in the last 10 years. • Not only are there more delays, but also longer delay periods. Of those flights arriving late, passengers experienced a record-breaking average flight arrival delay of 57 minutes, up nearly 3 minutes from 2006. • More than 54,000 flights affecting nearly 3.7 million passengers experienced taxi-in and taxi-out times of 1 to 5 hours or more. This is an increase of nearly 42 percent as compared to the same period in 2006. As you know, Secretary Peters has expressed serious concerns about the airlines’ treatment of passengers during extended ground delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport Association
    e AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 1301 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW SUITS 1100 WASHRIGTOH, 0C 20004-1707 20Z.6Z6.4000 www4lirli.nes.org November 9, 2005 The Honorable Tony Cardenas Chairman Committee on Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources Los Angeles City Council 200 N. Spring Street, Room 455 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Chairman Cardenas: During today's meeting of the Committee on Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources, the agenda includes a discussion of the recommendations contained in the Rand Corporation's report from February 3, 2005 entitled ''Near-Term Options for Improving Security at LAX.. " Like you, members of the Air Transport Association (ATA) 1 are united in our support of creating a safer and more secure LAX that maintains a high degree of customer service. We believe these objectives are not mutually exclusive, but are characteristics that should reflect LAX's standing as the world's number one origin and destination airport. We renew our pledge to work with you, your Committee, Rand and LAWA toward the development of cost-justified initiatives which are based on identified risks . When the Rand report was released last year, ATA made public statements expressing the industry's reservations with several of the report's recommendations. We continue to be concerned with the report's focus on staffmg requirements as a means of achieving greater security at LAX when in fact there are certain facility and TSA policy constraints that require greater attention in pursuit of the overall goal. We are hopeful that these 1 The members of the Association are: ABX Air, Alaska Airlines, Aloha Airlines, American Airlines, Astar Air Cargo, AT A Airlines, Atlas Air, Continental Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Evergreen International Airlines, Federal Express Corp., Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, , Midwest Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Polar Air Cargo, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, United Parcel Service, and US Airways; associate members are: Aeromexico, Air Canada, Air Jamaica, and Mexicana de Aviaci6n.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOTS July, 1988
    July, 1988 INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOTS We're Building An Airline From The Ground Up. or more than 80 years, UPS has been the leader in small parcel delivery. [. \ Now, as we climb to the top in the air, we have many aviation oppor­ tunities for women. To find out more about these outstanding oppor­ tunitiesF for women pilots, please send your resume to: United Parcel Service, P.O. Box 24265, Louisville, KY 40224 Attn: Air Employment. Wfe are an equal opportunity employer m/f. BARBARA SESTITO r n e Politics and fun do mix From the very first meeting, there were bantering and discussion she said, “ I hope Secretary: Doris Abbate disagreements. The minutes of meetings you don’t take this personally.” Treasurer: Pat Forbes held in early 1930 chronicle the discussions “ Never,” I said. of our strong - willed and independent Nothing we do is so earth shattering as to The election of Gene Nora Jessen as your predecessors. For the ensuing 51 years, we lose a friend over. We can disagree without new international president culminates her have pretty much carried on their tradition. being disagreeable, and we can usually find long career of service to the Ninety-Nines. Our members are still strong - willed, in­ some middle ground on which we can both Gene Nora has served on the board of dependent and opinionated on almost any operate. directors for a total of 10 years, and has subject. The important thing to remember is that held every office. I have enjoyed working A very good friend called, basically to let we need to spend more time doing fun with her throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel Consumer Report
    U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report A Product Of The OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS Aviation Consumer Protection Division Issued: March 2008 1 Flight Delays January 2008 12 Months Ending January 2008 1 Mishandled Baggage January 2008 1 Oversales 4th Quarter 2007 January-December 2007 2 Consumer Complaints January 2008 (Includes Disability and Discrimination Complaints) Customer Service Reports to 3 the Dept. of Homeland Security January 2008 Airline Animal Incident Reports4 January 2008 1 Data collected by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Website: http://www.bts.gov/ 2 Data compiled by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division. Website: http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/ 3 Data provided by the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration 4 Data collected by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page Introduction ......................…2 Flight Delays Mishandled Baggage Explanation ......................…3 Explanation ....................…..26 Table 1 ......................…4 Ranking--Month ....................…..27 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Operations Arriving On Time, by Carrier Oversales Table 1A ......................…5 Explanation ....................…..28 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking—4th Qtr ..................…....29 Operations Arriving On Time and Carrier Rank, Ranking—Jan-Dec ..................…....30 by Month, Quarter, and Data Base to Date Table 2 ......................…6 Consumer Complaints
    [Show full text]