DOCSLIB.ORG

FY20 Main Stats- Adaptive Connected.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY20 Main Stats- Adaptive Connected.Xlsx Sacramento International Airport Passenger Statistics December 2019 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % +/(-) 2019/20 2018/19 % +/(-) 2019 2018 % +/(-) Enplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 28,970 21,170 36.8% 176,441 141,817 24.4% 317,113 284,030 11.6% Horizon Air 9,126 10,554 (13.5%) 64,266 54,302 18.3% 125,163 107,360 16.6% American Airlines 51,271 50,483 1.6% 302,585 299,339 1.1% 596,762 581,032 2.7% Boutique 90 - 0.0% 484 - 0.0% 590 - 0.0% Contour 1,636 - 0.0% 7,878 - 0.0% 9,685 - 0.0% Delta Airlines 40,912 28,660 42.7% 245,699 205,975 19.3% 433,683 361,643 19.9% Frontier 6,656 3,968 67.7% 40,523 22,207 82.5% 71,610 22,207 222.5% Hawaiian Airlines 10,756 7,495 43.5% 62,662 43,361 44.5% 116,788 86,000 35.8% Jet Blue 13,161 13,117 0.3% 83,840 80,095 4.7% 152,859 161,066 (5.1%) Southwest 300,782 277,427 8.4% 1,765,562 1,688,081 4.6% 3,428,099 3,237,424 5.9% Spirit 11,512 - 0.0% 67,502 - 0.0% 71,710 - 0.0% Sun Country 2,116 - 0.0% 13,012 - 0.0% 15,763 - 0.0% United Airlines 37,811 44,276 (14.6%) 247,375 267,497 (7.5%) 482,881 455,098 6.1% 514,799 457,150 12.6% 3,077,829 2,802,674 9.8% 5,822,706 5,295,860 9.9% Commuters Alaska/Skywest 10,082 7,145 41.1% 44,372 52,568 (15.6%) 90,844 89,602 1.4% American/Skywest/Compass/Mesa 7,878 6,790 16.0% 44,431 44,691 (0.6%) 82,014 94,927 (13.6%) Delta/Skywest/Compass 20,156 21,894 (7.9%) 128,782 123,628 4.2% 251,553 253,711 (0.9%) United/Skywest/GoJet/Republic 12,246 11,360 7.8% 82,513 82,456 0.1% 168,622 163,824 2.9% 50,362 47,189 6.7% 300,098 303,343 (1.1%) 593,033 602,064 (1.5%) Charter 84 - 0.0% 374 426 (12.2%) 872 760 14.7% 84 - 0.0% 374 426 (12.2%) 872 760 14.7% International AeroMexico 7,776 5,334 45.8% 33,386 27,173 22.9% 61,360 55,712 10.1% Air Canada 1,773 1,537 15.4% 10,743 10,102 6.3% 20,953 12,811 63.6% Alaska Airlines 631 329 91.8% 2,028 1,406 44.2% 4,957 2,443 102.9% Southwest 1,153 1,860 (38.0%) 5,206 5,077 2.5% 9,272 6,789 36.6% Volaris 7,429 7,496 (0.9%) 37,893 29,024 30.6% 73,626 55,191 33.4% 18,762 16,556 13.3% 89,256 72,782 22.6% 170,168 132,946 28.0% Total Enplaned 584,007 520,895 12.1% 3,467,557 3,179,225 9.1% 6,586,779 6,031,630 9.2% Deplaned Domestic Alaska Airlines 29,523 20,606 43.3% 183,295 145,906 25.6% 324,131 288,811 12.2% Horizon Air 9,264 10,697 (13.4%) 64,714 55,449 16.7% 126,685 108,031 17.3% American Airlines 52,394 50,379 4.0% 300,238 299,769 0.2% 595,226 585,725 1.6% Boutique 115 - 0.0% 559 - 0.0% 675 - 0.0% Contour 1,728 - 0.0% 7,223 - 0.0% 9,045 - 0.0% Delta Airlines 40,225 27,950 43.9% 242,147 203,664 18.9% 431,446 361,015 19.5% Frontier 6,550 3,948 65.9% 42,586 23,404 82.0% 74,296 23,404 217.5% Hawaiian Airlines 10,528 7,401 42.3% 64,254 44,901 43.1% 120,200 88,697 35.5% Jet Blue 12,877 12,783 0.7% 82,682 79,190 4.4% 151,685 158,616 (4.4%) Southwest 300,107 278,048 7.9% 1,766,693 1,687,958 4.7% 3,426,251 3,231,379 6.0% Spirit 12,286 - 0.0% 66,533 - 0.0% 70,226 - 0.0% Sun Country 2,373 - 0.0% 14,279 - 0.0% 16,918 - 0.0% United Airlines 38,113 43,652 (12.7%) 247,449 263,737 (6.2%) 482,180 450,008 7.1% 516,083 455,464 13.3% 3,082,652 2,803,978 9.9% 5,828,964 5,295,686 10.1% Commuters Alaska/Skywest 7,524 6,936 8.5% 40,736 51,309 (20.6%) 83,916 85,269 (1.6%) American/Skywest/Compass/Mesa 7,281 6,147 18.4% 42,686 45,068 (5.3%) 77,815 93,661 (16.9%) Delta/Skywest/Compass 20,589 21,745 (5.3%) 133,748 127,974 4.5% 256,420 256,754 (0.1%) United/Skywest/GoJet/Republic 12,549 10,387 20.8% 85,375 80,922 5.5% 167,637 158,440 5.8% 47,943 45,215 6.0% 302,545 305,273 (0.9%) 585,788 594,124 (1.4%) Charter 52 - 0.0% 338 416 (18.8%) 832 748 11.2% 52 - 0.0% 338 416 (18.8%) 832 748 11.2% International AeroMexico 5,755 3,818 50.7% 29,991 24,087 24.5% 60,891 54,953 10.8% Air Canada 1,651 1,527 8.1% 10,100 9,866 2.4% 19,935 11,922 67.2% Alaska Airlines 537 205 162.0% 1,914 1,433 33.6% 5,715 2,252 153.8% Southwest 1,127 1,659 (32.1%) 5,211 4,975 4.7% 9,480 6,567 44.4% Volaris 5,735 5,100 12.5% 36,400 25,823 41.0% 74,456 52,881 40.8% 14,805 12,309 20.3% 83,616 66,184 26.3% 170,477 128,575 32.6% Total Deplaned 578,883 512,988 12.8% 3,469,151 3,175,851 9.2% 6,586,061 6,019,133 9.4% ENPLANED AND DEPLANED PASSENGERS 1,162,890 1,033,883 12.5% 6,936,708 6,355,076 9.2% 13,172,840 12,050,763 9.3% 9/22/2020 Sacramento County Airport System Summary of Activity December 2019 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % + / ( - ) 2019/20 2018/19 % + / ( - ) 2019 2018 % +/(-) Sacramento International Airport Passengers Enplaned 584,007 520,895 12.1% 3,467,557 3,179,225 9.1% 6,586,779 6,031,630 9.2% Deplaned 578,883 512,988 12.8% 3,469,151 3,175,851 9.2% 6,586,061 6,019,133 9.4% 1,162,890 1,033,883 12.5% 6,936,708 6,355,076 9.2% 13,172,840 12,050,763 9.3% Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) 703,188 663,250 6.0% 4,180,077 3,891,813 7.4% 7,937,678 7,345,888 8.1% # of Landings 5,477 5,045 8.6% 33,150 30,320 9.3% 62,935 57,932 8.6% Airmail (Pounds) On 2,479,764 646,826 283.4% 13,098,887 3,704,374 253.6% 16,688,483 7,127,801 134.1% Off 2,245,611 574,416 290.9% 12,150,549 3,283,605 270.0% 15,022,614 6,347,837 136.7% 4,725,375 1,221,242 286.9% 25,249,436 6,987,979 261.3% 31,711,097 13,475,638 135.3% Freight (Pounds) On 11,104,543 14,053,701 (21.0%) 54,285,566 67,225,311 (19.2%) 108,035,758 123,971,642 (12.9%) Off 12,818,675 12,576,195 1.9% 56,765,425 62,406,756 (9.0%) 108,420,240 116,767,144 (7.1%) 23,923,218 26,629,896 (10.2%) 111,050,991 129,632,067 (14.3%) 216,455,998 240,738,786 (10.1%) Aircraft Operations Air Carrier 10,221 9,759 4.7% 61,497 58,284 5.5% 117,817 109,754 7.3% Air Taxi 1,051 669 57.1% 6,089 3,871 57.3% 10,706 9,113 17.5% General Aviation 461 563 (18.1%) 3,606 4,432 (18.6%) 7,978 8,857 (9.9%) Military 146 113 29.2% 475 1,149 (58.7%) 1,980 2,201 (10.0%) 11,879 11,104 7.0% 71,667 67,736 5.8% 138,481 129,925 6.6% Mather Airport Passengers Enplaned 16 - 0.0% 72 98 (26.5%) 97 155 (37.4%) Deplaned 16 - 0.0% 87 86 1.2% 111 136 (18.4%) 32 - 0.0% 159 184 (13.6%) 208 291 (28.5%) Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) 88,870 84,603 5.0% 297,972 310,981 (4.2%) 547,093 553,493 (1.2%) # of Landings 421 413 1.9% 1,723 1,940 (11.2%) 3,282 3,749 (12.5%) Freight (Pounds) On 8,840,743 8,828,153 0.1% 40,339,684 38,694,400 4.3% 74,116,568 71,684,034 3.4% Off 10,157,409 9,602,434 5.8% 49,037,660 44,237,693 10.9% 91,182,112 82,123,453 11.0% 18,998,152 18,430,587 3.1% 89,377,344 82,932,093 7.8% 165,298,680 153,807,487 7.5% Aircraft Operations Air Carrier 1,037 958 8.2% 3,845 4,433 (13.3%) 7,167 8,367 (14.3%) Air Taxi 1,215 1,435 (15.3%) 6,860 8,144 (15.8%) 14,600 16,653 (12.3%) General Aviation 3,715 4,780 (22.3%) 29,548 30,195 (2.1%) 57,658 61,343 (6.0%) Military 661 1,226 (46.1%) 6,996 9,324 (25.0%) 15,067 18,551 (18.8%) 6,628 8,399 (21.1%) 47,249 52,096 (9.3%) 94,492 104,914 (9.9%) Sacramento Executive Airport Landings Landed Weight (1,000 pounds) - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% # of Landings - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Freight (Pounds) On - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Off - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Aircraft Operations Air Carrier - - 0.0% - - 0.0% - - 0.0% Air Taxi 177 159 11.3% 878 1,256 (30.1%) 1,856 2,211 (16.1%) General Aviation 7,316 9,728 (24.8%) 62,682 55,087 13.8% 122,464 108,378 13.0% Military 56 25 124.0% 250 122 104.9% 449 337 33.2% 7,549 9,912 (23.8%) 63,810 56,465 13.0% 124,769 110,926 12.5% 9/22/2020 Sacramento International Airport Passenger Statistics Prior 12 months Current Year Prior Year Year over Year Change Enplaned Deplaned Enplaned Deplaned Enplaned % Difference Deplaned % Difference Jan-2019 453,774 459,655 415,828 422,017 37,946 9.1% 37,638 8.9% Feb-2019 430,685 430,169 393,600 394,989 37,085 9.4% 35,180 8.9% Mar-2019 523,365 524,433 483,778 476,978 39,587 8.2% 47,455 9.9% Apr-2019 540,261 539,600 482,336 485,145 57,925 12.0% 54,455 11.2% May-2019 573,854 578,961 525,039 527,059 48,815 9.3% 51,902 9.8% Jun-2019 597,283 584,092 551,824 537,094 45,459 8.2% 46,998 8.8% Jul-2019 613,351 617,255 549,888 552,159 63,463 11.5% 65,096 11.8% Aug-2019 587,619 598,783 533,469 540,851 54,150 10.2% 57,932 10.7% Sep-2019 555,996 553,547 503,617 500,254 52,379 10.4% 53,293 10.7% Oct-2019 579,159 577,748 535,868 537,513 43,291 8.1% 40,235 7.5% Nov-2019 547,425 542,935 535,488 532,086 11,937 2.2% 10,849 2.0% Dec-2019 584,007 578,883 520,895 512,988 63,112 12.1% 65,895 12.8% 6,586,779 6,586,061 6,031,630 6,019,133 555,149 9.2% 566,928 9.4% Total Enplaned Passengers by Month 650,000 600,000 550,000 2015 2016 500,000 2017 2018 450,000 2019 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 9/22/2020 Sacramento International Airport Landed Weight and Landing Statistics December 2019 CURRENT MONTH FISCAL YEAR TO DATE CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE THIS YEAR LAST YEAR % + / ( - ) 2019/20 2018/19 % + / ( - ) 2019 2018 % + / ( - ) Landed Weight Domestic Alaska Airlines 34,972 22,987 52.1% 208,151 151,797 37.1% 366,752 309,967 18.3% Horizon Air 9,296 10,496 (11.4%) 66,017 52,645 25.4% 128,105 104,599 22.5% American Airlines 53,822 55,331 (2.7%) 315,306 315,705 (0.1%) 626,902 606,829 3.3% Boutique 317 - 0.0% 2,202 - 0.0% 2,689 - 0.0% Contour 3,304 - 0.0% 14,805 - 0.0% 17,986 - 0.0% Delta Airlines 40,600 28,392 43.0% 243,523 203,322 19.8% 429,172 360,726 19.0% Frontier 5,575 3,270 70.5% 37,768 19,554 93.1% 64,818 19,554 231.5% Hawaiian Airlines 10,826 9,720 11.4% 70,025 58,651 19.4% 137,277 117,142 17.2% Jet Blue 14,261 15,428 (7.6%) 93,081 93,669 (0.6%) 177,533 179,620 (1.2%) Southwest 322,624 319,273 1.0% 1,970,560 1,901,435 3.6% 3,841,249 3,632,871 5.7% Spirit 12,842 - 0.0% 75,346
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Here Applicants and Recruiters Can • Read All the Magazine Issues of Aero Crew News
    September 2016 Aero Crew News Your Source for Pilot Hiring Information and More... Contract Talks Moving Benefits Exclusive Hiring Briefing Aviator Bulletins Upgraded Training Facilities, Partnerships with Schools CPP, internship and more! Fitness Corner Calories in Your Drink, Beware You deserve your dream job. ExpressJet o ers everything that you’re looking for when starting your career. Make the smart choice for your future and fly with the best at ExpressJet. Great Pay o $37-40/hr first year pay o Guaranteed profit sharing program o Leading healthcare benefits Path to the Majors o United Career Path Program o JetBlue University and Advanced Gateways o More pilots hired by the majors each year than any other regional Industry-leading Training o ATP CTP o ered for free (always!) as part of paid training o In-house training tailored to each pilot gives you the best rate of success o Advanced Qualification Program (AQP) Learn more about why ExpressJet is the smart choice for your future at flysmartchoice.com Apply today at expressjet.com/apply You deserve your dream job. ExpressJet o ers everything that you’re looking for when starting your career. Make the smart choice for your future and fly with the best at ExpressJet. Great Pay o $37-40/hr first year pay o Guaranteed profit sharing program Aero Crew Solutions Launches New Website Aero Crew Solutions is proud to announce the complete • The ability for companies to publish their latest o Leading healthcare benefits redesign of our website. Our goal is to continue the job news on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada-California, USA November 2014
    Nevada-California, USA November 2014 While the end of 2014 was approaching, I still had about ten vacation days left. Therefore I decided to spent these on a spotting trip. I teamed up with fellow reader EC and we agreed that the south-western part of the United States would be a great place to visit. The chances of finding nice airplanes and good weather in this part of the world are rather high, even at the end of November. We decided to spend three days in Las Vegas and then drive to southern California, where we would spend almost a full week. The primary focus would be on photographing airliners and fire fighting aircraft, but some number crunching was done as well (although most logs below are not complete). Please note that all mm’s mentioned apply to a 1.5 crop factor camera and all aircraft are only noted once per airport. On the morning of Wednesday 19 November Eddy and I met at Schiphol at approximately 8 AM. There we learned that our flight to Houston was delayed for several hours. Fortunately United Airlines rebooked us on flight UA908 to Chicago. 19 November 2014 Schiphol EHAM G-FBEI Embraer 195LR Flybe LZ-FBE Airbus A320-200 Bulgaria Air N14121 Boeing 757-200 United Airlines N652UA Boeing 767-300ER United Airlines YU-APJ Airbus A319-100 Air Serbia A few planes were noted before boarding the 22-year-old Boeing 767. The flight to Chicago was uneventful in my opinion. However some other passengers complained about the cabin temperature and as a result all passengers received an 100 USD online voucher, to be spent on United Airlines flights with in the next year.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel Consumer Report Is a Monthly Product of the Department of Transportation's Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
    U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report Issued: MARCH 2002 Includes data for the following periods: Flight Delays January 2002 12 Months Ending January 2002 Mishandled Baggage January 2002 Oversales 4th Quarter 2001 January-December 2001 Consumer Complaints January 2002 (Includes Disability Complaints) Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings http://www.dot.gov/airconsumer/ TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page INTRODUCTION ......................…2 Flight Delays Explanation ......................…3 Mishandled Baggage Table 1 ......................…4 Explanation ....................…..17 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking ....................…..18 Operations Arriving On Time, by Carrier Table 1A ......................…5 Oversales Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Explanation ....................…..19 Operations Arriving On Time and Carrier Rank, by Month, Quarter, and Data Base to Date Ranking--Quarter ....................…..20 Table 2 ......................…6 Ranking--YTD ....................…..21 Number of Reported Flight Arrivals and Per- centage Arriving On Time, by Carrier and Airport Consumer Complaints Table 3 ......................…8 Explanation ....................…..22 Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Complaint Tables 1-5 ..............23 Operations Arriving On Time, by Airport and Summary, Complaint Categories, U.S. Airlines, Time of Day Incident Date, and Companies Other Than Table 4 .....................…9 U.S. Airlines Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Rankings,
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, Supplemental Schedules for the Year Ended June 30, 2003 and Independent Auditors' Report
    State of Hawaii Department of Transportation - Airports Division (An Enterprise Fund of the State of Hawaii) Financial Statements for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, Supplemental Schedules for the Year Ended June 30, 2003 and Independent Auditors' Report STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - AIRPORTS DIVISION (An Enterprise Fund of the State Of Hawaii) TABLE OF CONTENTS JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2002 Page Independent Auditors' Report 1-2 Management's Discussion and Analysis 3-14 Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002: Statements of Net Assets 15-17 Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets 18-19 Statements of Cash Flows 20-22 Notes to Financial Statements 23-44 Supplementary Information - Schedules as of and for the Year Ended June 30, 2003: 1 - Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses Other Than Depreciation 45 2 - Calculations of Net Revenues and Taxes and Debt Service Requirement 46-47 3 - Summary of Debt Service Requirements to Maturity 48 4 - Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - Airports System Revenue Bonds 49 5 - Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - General Obligation Bonds 50 6 - Airports System Charges - Fiscal Year 1995-97 Lease Extension 51-53 7 - Approved Maximum Revenue Landing Weights and Airport Landing Fees - Signatory Airlines 54 8 - Approved Maximum Revenue Landing Weights and Airport Landing Fees - Nonsignatory Airlines 55 Deloitte & Touche LLP Suite 1200 1132 Bishop Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813· 2870 Tel: (808) 543-0700 Fax: (808) 526-0225 www.us.deloitte.com Deloitte &Touche INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Director Department of Transportation State of Hawaii: We have audited the statements of net assets of the Airports Division, Department ofTransportation, State of Hawaii (an enterprise fund of the State of Hawaii) (Airports Division) as of June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of revenues, expenses and changes in net assets, and of cash flows for the years then ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Fountain
    61 far from solution. The difficulties of acquiring land and financing for this costly project appeared overwhelming. Mean- while, fuel tankers continued to make their noisy take-offs over Honolulu. The airport hoped there would be a technical development that would eliminate the need for this flight path. Highlights July 1, 1962 The Hawaii Visitors Information Program was established to welcome passengers at Honolulu International Airport and Honolulu Harbor, to encourage travel to the Neighbor Islands, and to provide information and other help to airport and harbor visitors. As of June 30, 1963, the staff of the HVIP consisted of 33 full-time and nine part-time employees. July 10, 1962 The widening of Taxiway X and restoration of P Road with a crossing over a new drainage ditch was com- pleted at a cost of $113,463.82. July 22, 1962 The Empress of Lima, a four-engine Britannia jet turboprop, crashed at 11:19 p.m. and burned while making an approach to Runway 8 on the Hickam Field portion of the airport. Twenty-seven persons were killed and 13 survived. It was the worst civil air carrier accident in the Islands’ history. The Air Force Fire Department acted promptly to minimize loss of life. Personnel of the Airport, Navy and City and County assisted in fighting the fire, maintaining order, and pro- viding ambulances and other services. The crash dramatically showed the need for continued cooperation between the Air Force and the airport. Several meetings were held after the crash and a number of suggestions developed for further improvement of the pattern for teamwork.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2
    DCCD Doc No. 28 28/4/09 (English only) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Montréal, 20 April to 2 May 2009) CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AIRCRAFT TO THIRD PARTIES AND CONVENTION ON COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGE TO THIRD PARTIES, RESULTING FROM ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE INVOLVING AIRCRAFT (Presented by the Air Crash Victims Families Group) 1. INTRODUCTION – SUPPLEMENTAL AND OTHER COMPENSATIONS 1.1 The apocalyptic terrorist attack by the means of four hi-jacked planes committed against the World Trade Center in New York, NY , the Pentagon in Arlington, VA and the aborted flight ending in a crash in the rural area in Shankville, PA ON September 11th, 2001 is the only real time example that triggered this proposed Convention on Compensation for Damage to Third Parties from Acts of Unlawful Interference Involving Aircraft. 1.2 It is therefore important to look towards the post incident resolution of this tragedy in order to adequately and pro actively complete ONE new General Risk Convention (including compensation for ALL catastrophic damages) for the twenty first century. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Immediately after September 11th, 2001 – the Government and Congress met with all affected and interested parties resulting in the “Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act” (Public Law 107-42-Sept. 22,2001). 2.2 This Law provided the basis for Rules and Regulations for: a) Airline Stabilization; b) Aviation Insurance; c) Tax Provisions; d) Victims Compensation; and e) Air Transportation Safety. DCCD Doc No. 28 - 2 - 2.3 The Airline Stabilization Act created the legislative vehicle needed to reimburse the air transport industry for their losses of income as a result of the flight interruption due to the 911 attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Iv Regionals/Commuters
    CHAPTER IV REGIONALS/COMMUTERS For purposes of the Federal Aviation REVIEW OF 20032 Administration (FAA) forecasts, air carriers that are included as part of the regional/commuter airline industry meet three criteria. First, a The results for the regional/commuter industry for regional/commuter carrier flies a majority of their 2003 reflect the continuation of a trend that started available seat miles (ASMs) using aircraft having with the events of September 11th and have been 70 seats or less. Secondly, the service provided by drawn out by the Iraq War and Severe Acute these carriers is primarily regularly scheduled Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). These “shocks” to passenger service. Thirdly, the primary mission of the system have led to the large air carriers posting the carrier is to provide connecting service for its losses in passengers for 3 years running. The code-share partners. losses often reflect diversions in traffic to the regional/commuter carriers. These carriers During 2003, 75 reporting regional/commuter recorded double-digit growth in both capacity and airlines met this definition. Monthly traffic data for traffic for the second time in as many years. History 10 of these carriers was compiled from the has demonstrated that the regional/commuter Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Form 41 industry endures periods of uncertainty better than and T-100 filings. Traffic for the remaining the larger air carriers. During the oil embargo of 65 carriers was compiled solely from T-100 filings. 1 1973, the recession in 1990, and the Gulf War in Prior to fiscal year 2003, 10 regionals/commuters 1991, the regional/commuter industry consistently reported on DOT Form 41 while 65 smaller outperformed the larger air carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters Philip E
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 67 | Issue 2 Article 3 2002 Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters Philip E. Crowther Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Philip E. Crowther, Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters, 67 J. Air L. & Com. 241 (2002) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol67/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. TAXATION OF FRACTIONAL PROGRAMS: "FLYING OVER UNCHARTED WATERS" PHILIP E. CROWTHER* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 243 A. GENERAL DESIGN OF THE PROGRAM ............. 243 1. The Basic Agreements ........................ 243 2. General Principles ........................... 244 3. Operation of the Program..................... 246 4. Economic Analysis of the Program............. 249 5. Tax Analysis of the Program ................. 251 II. FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION TAX .............. 251 A. THE GENERAL RULES ........................... 251 1. The Transportation Tax ..................... 251 2. Taxation of Use of Own Aircraft .............. 256 3. Taxation of Joint Ownership Agreement ....... 261 4. Taxation of Dry Lease Exchange .............. 262 B. CHARACTERIZATION OF FRACTIONAL PROGRAMS.. 264 1. The FractionalCompany Rulings ............. 264 2. Executive Jet Aviation ........................ 267 3. Critique..................................... 270 C. CONSEQUENCES AND REMAINING ISSUES ......... 278 III. INCOME TAX ISSUES ............................. 279 A. THE GENERAL RULES ........................... 279 1. The Income Tax ............................. 279 * Attorney, Law Offices of Phil Crowther, a Kansas legal practice limited to aviation business and tax law. From 1986 to 1999, he was the Tax Manager and Assistant Treasurer at Cessna Aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions Needed to Improve Airline Customer Service and Minimize Long, On-Board Delays
    Before the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Aviation United States House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:00 p.m. EDT Actions Needed To Wednesday September 26, 2007 Improve Airline CC-2007-099 Customer Service and Minimize Long, On-Board Delays Statement of The Honorable Calvin L. Scovel III Inspector General U.S. Department of Transportation Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: We are pleased to be here today to discuss airline customer service issues and the actions needed from the Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), airlines, and airports to minimize long, on-board delays. This hearing is both timely and important given the record-breaking flight delays, cancellations, diversions, and on-board tarmac delays that air travelers have already experienced this year. Based on the first 7 months of the year: • Nearly 28 percent of flights were delayed, cancelled, or diverted—with airlines’ on-time performance at the lowest percentage (72 percent) recorded in the last 10 years. • Not only are there more delays, but also longer delay periods. Of those flights arriving late, passengers experienced a record-breaking average flight arrival delay of 57 minutes, up nearly 3 minutes from 2006. • More than 54,000 flights affecting nearly 3.7 million passengers experienced taxi-in and taxi-out times of 1 to 5 hours or more. This is an increase of nearly 42 percent as compared to the same period in 2006. As you know, Secretary Peters has expressed serious concerns about the airlines’ treatment of passengers during extended ground delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport Association
    e AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 1301 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW SUITS 1100 WASHRIGTOH, 0C 20004-1707 20Z.6Z6.4000 www4lirli.nes.org November 9, 2005 The Honorable Tony Cardenas Chairman Committee on Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources Los Angeles City Council 200 N. Spring Street, Room 455 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Chairman Cardenas: During today's meeting of the Committee on Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources, the agenda includes a discussion of the recommendations contained in the Rand Corporation's report from February 3, 2005 entitled ''Near-Term Options for Improving Security at LAX.. " Like you, members of the Air Transport Association (ATA) 1 are united in our support of creating a safer and more secure LAX that maintains a high degree of customer service. We believe these objectives are not mutually exclusive, but are characteristics that should reflect LAX's standing as the world's number one origin and destination airport. We renew our pledge to work with you, your Committee, Rand and LAWA toward the development of cost-justified initiatives which are based on identified risks . When the Rand report was released last year, ATA made public statements expressing the industry's reservations with several of the report's recommendations. We continue to be concerned with the report's focus on staffmg requirements as a means of achieving greater security at LAX when in fact there are certain facility and TSA policy constraints that require greater attention in pursuit of the overall goal. We are hopeful that these 1 The members of the Association are: ABX Air, Alaska Airlines, Aloha Airlines, American Airlines, Astar Air Cargo, AT A Airlines, Atlas Air, Continental Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Evergreen International Airlines, Federal Express Corp., Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, , Midwest Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Polar Air Cargo, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, United Parcel Service, and US Airways; associate members are: Aeromexico, Air Canada, Air Jamaica, and Mexicana de Aviaci6n.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOTS July, 1988
    July, 1988 INTERNATIONAL WOMEN PILOTS We're Building An Airline From The Ground Up. or more than 80 years, UPS has been the leader in small parcel delivery. [. \ Now, as we climb to the top in the air, we have many aviation oppor­ tunities for women. To find out more about these outstanding oppor­ tunitiesF for women pilots, please send your resume to: United Parcel Service, P.O. Box 24265, Louisville, KY 40224 Attn: Air Employment. Wfe are an equal opportunity employer m/f. BARBARA SESTITO r n e Politics and fun do mix From the very first meeting, there were bantering and discussion she said, “ I hope Secretary: Doris Abbate disagreements. The minutes of meetings you don’t take this personally.” Treasurer: Pat Forbes held in early 1930 chronicle the discussions “ Never,” I said. of our strong - willed and independent Nothing we do is so earth shattering as to The election of Gene Nora Jessen as your predecessors. For the ensuing 51 years, we lose a friend over. We can disagree without new international president culminates her have pretty much carried on their tradition. being disagreeable, and we can usually find long career of service to the Ninety-Nines. Our members are still strong - willed, in­ some middle ground on which we can both Gene Nora has served on the board of dependent and opinionated on almost any operate. directors for a total of 10 years, and has subject. The important thing to remember is that held every office. I have enjoyed working A very good friend called, basically to let we need to spend more time doing fun with her throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel Consumer Report
    U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report A Product Of The OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS Aviation Consumer Protection Division Issued: March 2008 1 Flight Delays January 2008 12 Months Ending January 2008 1 Mishandled Baggage January 2008 1 Oversales 4th Quarter 2007 January-December 2007 2 Consumer Complaints January 2008 (Includes Disability and Discrimination Complaints) Customer Service Reports to 3 the Dept. of Homeland Security January 2008 Airline Animal Incident Reports4 January 2008 1 Data collected by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Website: http://www.bts.gov/ 2 Data compiled by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division. Website: http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/ 3 Data provided by the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration 4 Data collected by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page Introduction ......................…2 Flight Delays Mishandled Baggage Explanation ......................…3 Explanation ....................…..26 Table 1 ......................…4 Ranking--Month ....................…..27 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Operations Arriving On Time, by Carrier Oversales Table 1A ......................…5 Explanation ....................…..28 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking—4th Qtr ..................…....29 Operations Arriving On Time and Carrier Rank, Ranking—Jan-Dec ..................…....30 by Month, Quarter, and Data Base to Date Table 2 ......................…6 Consumer Complaints
    [Show full text]