DOCSLIB.ORG

NORTHEAST NIGERIA CAMP MANAGEMENT BI-WEEKLY TRACKER REPORT Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NORTHEAST NIGERIA CAMP MANAGEMENT BI-WEEKLY TRACKER REPORT Report No NORTHEAST NIGERIA CAMP MANAGEMENT BI-WEEKLY TRACKER REPORT Report No. 23 | 01-15 October 2020. 164 189,562 823,344 154 IDP camps managed by partners Households (HH) reached by CCCM partner Individuals (ind) reached by CCCM partner Site facilitators managing in Adamawa and Borno state. agencies. agencies in Adamawa and Borno state. camps. The Camp Management bi-weekly tracker report is a service monitoring and gap analysis tool produced by the CCCM/Shelter/NFI sector. The tracker supports humanitarian partners in iden�fying gaps in assistance and service YOBE delivery. It enables stakeholders to track ac�vi�es, iden�fy gaps and thereby improving the delivery of assistance. BORNO As of September 2020, 164 camps were covered by partner agencies in the following Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Adamawa State: Fufore, Girei, Mubi South, Yola South and Yola North while in Borno State, the sites are located in Bama, Biu, Damboa, Dikwa, Gwoza, Jere, Kaga, Konduga, Mafa, Magumeri, Maiduguri, Monguno, Ngala and Nganzai LGA. KEY HIGHLIGHTS ADAMAWA The CCCM, Shelter and NFI sector in the repor�ng period of 1st -15th October received a series of Ad-hoc reports on the widespread destruc�on and damages to shelters in camps and camps-like se�ng as a result of exceeded shelters life-span and vandalism. Hence, a total of 9,656 vulnerable households in dire need of shelter, shelter repairs and essen�al non-food items (NFIs) were recorded. The affected persons are currently living in precarious LGA with CCCM activity condi�ons and are exposed to a range of protec�on threat and concerns. Access to shelter and NFI response LGA with no CCCM activity Inaccessible LGA materials has been slow due to inconsistencies in security and impediments in reaching affected popula�ons thus Lake Chad hampering the repair and reconstruc�on of damaged shelters in Borno and Adamawa by sector partners. The sector is capitalizing on its ac�ve collabora�on with its partners and other sectors to coordinate and advocate CCCM PARTNER AGENCIES for quick and �mely responses through cross-sectoral partnerships to bridge the exis�ng gaps. Collabora�on between CCCM, Shelter/NFI sector and WASH, Protec�on and Logis�cs sectors have thus been strengthened to provide lifesaving and sustainable assistance in a flexible and targeted approach during this interven�on. INTERVENTIONS/GAPElderly BY SECTOR CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE • There are 46 formal and 235 informal camps in the BAY states. 58% of these sites has dedicated or mobile site facilita�on. WATER SOURCE • Management of COVID-19 quaran�ne shelters and informa�on centres in camps and • The main source of drinking and host communi�es. non-drinking water at displacement sites is the borehole (81%). Other Informal camps with facilita�on 97 21 4% Borno sources of water supply include hand 17% Informal camps without facilita�on 93 4 20 Adamawa pumps, wells, water vendors and Yobe water trucking. 48% Formal camps with facilita�on 44 2 • 79% of the displacement sites has an Figure 1: Number of displacement sites by states and by facilitation. average wai�ng �me at water points 31% less than 30minutes while 17% is SHELTER between 30minutes and an hour and 4% is above one hour (figure 8). • 46% of the IDPs are living in emergency shelter, 28% in makeshi�, 12% in collec�ve/ 15 - 29Mins <15mins 30Mins - 1hour >1hour communal shelter, 9% in public facili�es and 5% in transi�onal shelter. Figure 8: Average waiting time at water points. • 2,729HH are sharing shelter across 30 sites in 8 LGAs. LATRINES • 84% of latrines in Borno are func�onal while 16% are damaged. 1% 5% • 5 sites in 4 LGAs (Girei in Adamawa state, Jere, Konduga and MMC in Borno state) do 9% 9% not have latrines on site. 12% 46% Adamawa 23% 77% Damaged Latrines Func�onal latrines 28% 90% Borno 16% 84% Figure 6: Latrines status in Adamawa and Borno state. Emergency shelters Makeshi� shelters Communal shelters • 51% of latrines across 113 sites in 17 LGAs need gender marking. Public facili�es Transi�onal shelters HH in a form of shelter Damaged shelters HH sharing shelter Figure 2: % of households living in various type of shelter. Figure 3: Total shelter and their status. • 15% latrines needs desludgement across 73 sites in 16 LGAs (table 1). LGA No. of latrines LGA No. of latrines LGA No. of latrines NON-FOOD ITEMS Jere 999 Damboa 222 Girei 67 • A total of 73,211HH need complete NFI kits. This include 13,809HH in Maiduguri, Monguno 595 Dikwa 218 Konduga 64 13,580HH in Monguno, 9,255HH in Jere, 8,276 in Ngala, 7,081HH in Dikwa, 5,283HH in Maiduguri 468 Ngala 218 Biu 40 Bama 354 Mafa 200 Fufore 34 Damboa, 3,789HH in Bama, 2,835HH in Konduga, 2,832HH in Gwoza, 2,000HH in Mafa, Gwoza 230 Yola North/South 95 Kaga 6 4,471HH in Magumeri, Yola North, Yola South, Girei, Fufore, Biu and Kaga LGA. Table 1: Latrines in need of desludgment per displacement LGA • 44% of the sites reported that blankets/mats are the most needed NFIs while Kitchen sets are the second most needed NFIs. SHOWERS • 82% of the total showers are func�onal while 18% need16 to be repaired. 5% 7% 5% • 16 sites in 5 LGAs (Girei in Adamawa state, Konduga, Jere, Maiduguri and Dikwa in 6% Borno state) do not have shower on site. 11% 29% 14% • 1,647 showers needs to be repaired across 80 sites in 17 LGAs (table 2). 44% 15% LGA No. of showers LGA No. of showers LGA No. of showers 22% Monguno 432 Ngala 119 Mugumeri 43 24% 18% Konduga 221 Maiduguri 82 Girei 29 Jere 187 Damboa 77 Yola North/South 24 Dikwa 132 Fufore 63 Biu 16 Blankets/Mats Kitchen Sets Plas�c Shee�ng Blankets/Mats Kitchen Sets Mosquito Nets Kaga 127 Gwoza 63 Bama 12 Mosquito Nets Bucket/Jerry Can Soap Bucket/Jerry Can Plas�c Shee�ng Soap Showers in need of repairs per displacement LGA Figure 4: % of sites by the most needed NFI Figure 5: % of sites by the second most needed NFI Table 2: FOOD SECURITY (FS) EARLY RECOVERY AND LIVELIHOOD (ERL) • 71% of the IDP popula�on received food assistance the previous month. (Fig. 9) • 45% of the camps in the displaced Dikwa 8 • 1,828HH received agricultural livelihood assistance in Dikwa [747], Damboa, [462], LGAs currently have access to Gwoza 7 Gwoza [292], Monguno [212], Ngala [25] and Konduga [10]. voca�onal trainings. Monguno 5 Konduga 5 • 55% do not have access to any form of Maiduguri 4 Monguno 11,269 voca�onal training within the site or Jere 4 Dikwa 8,212 Kaga 3 Damboa 5,930 nearby. Yola South 2 Gwoza 5,875 • IDPs in all the camps have access to Fufore 2 Maiduguri 5,399 29% market on site or nearby. Ngala 1 Jere 4,761 Damboa 1 Mafa 3,886 Bama 1 Ngala 3,000 71% Konduga 2,744 Camps with ERL services Bama 899 Figure 14: Sites per LGA with early recovery Yola South 878 and livelihood service(s) Fufore 814 Girei 798 Magumeri 589 PROTECTION Biu 266 • 18% of the total households are headed by vulnerable popula�on with 17% being HH that received food assistance the previous month Kaga 149 headed by women (>18 years) and 1% by children (<18 years). HH NOT benefi�ng from food distribu�on Yola North 88 Figure 9: % of HH currently benefitting from Figure 10: HH not benefitting from food Pregnant/lacta�ng 50,602 food distribution distribution by LGA Female headed households 33,432 NUTRITION People with special needs 6,187 • Supplementary feeding for children, pregnant and lacta�ng mothers was carried out in Unaccompanied/Seperated children 3,937 60% of the camps while screening and supplementary feeding for malnourished children was carried out in 45% of the IDP camps. Child headed households 936 Figure 15: Protection concerns Maiduguri 17 Jere 16 Dikwa 12 AVAILABLE ACTIVITIES/SERVICES BY SECTOR Monguno 12 Sector Activities/Services Konduga 10 Awareness raising/sensitization, camp coordination meeting, Gwoza 8 Kaga 5 complaints and feedback mechanism, hygiene promotion campaigns, Magumeri 4 inspection of site infrastructure, LGA coordination meeting, Damboa 4 monitoring/facilitating fire sensitization campaign, PWSN meeting, Ngala 2 registration for shelter allocation, registration of new arrivals, safety Fufore 2 CCCM mapping/safety audit, set up committee structures and identification of Bama 2 members, shelter addressing, site coordination meeting with partners Mafa 1 and committee representatives, site inspection in reponse to storm, Girei 1 site level management meetings with committee representatives, site Biu 1 management committee meeting, training of committee members, Figure 11: Number of camps per displacement LGA that are benefitted from the nutrition activities variant committee meetings and sensitization on COVID-19. Construction of emergency shelters, distribution of cash/voucher for Shelter/NFI HEALTH NFI, NFI kits distribution, shelter repair and improvements. Early Recovery and Employment through cash-for-work, social cohesion, community •All the camps has established health structures, COVID-19 sensi�za�on, response Livelihood reconciliation, establishment or scale up of small businesses. pathway and access to mobile clinics where vaccina�on ac�vi�es and essen�al medicine Classroom construction, rehabilitation/re-opening, extra curricular distribu�on services are provided by health partners. Education activities, distribution of learning supplies, training of teachers. •15% of camps reported cases of malaria. Distribution of essential medicines and equipments, establishment of Health EDUCATION health structure, food distribution, medical referrals, vaccination. •68% of camps has access to a form of educa�on in the camp or nearby.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CPSWG RESPONSE DASHBOARD - ADAMAWA STATE - Quarter 1, 2019 Child Protection Sub Working Group, Nigeria
    CPSWG RESPONSE DASHBOARD - ADAMAWA STATE - Quarter 1, 2019 Child Protection Sub Working Group, Nigeria YobeCASE MANAGEMENT REACH BY LGA PSYCHOSOCIALYobe SUPPORT SERVICES (PSS) REACH BY LGA 78% 14% Madagali ± Madagali ± Borno Borno Michika Michika 86% 10% 82% 16% Mubi North Mubi North Hong 100% Mubi South 5% Hong Gombi 100% 100% Gombi 10% 27% Mubi South Shelleng Shelleng Guyuk Song 0% Guyuk Song 0% 0% Maiha 0% Maiha Chad Chad Lamurde 0% Lamurde 0% Nigeria Girei Nigeria Girei 36% 81% 11% 96% Numan 0% Numan 0% Yola North Demsa 100% Demsa 26% Yola North 100% 0% Adamawa Fufore Yola South 0% Yola South 100% Fufore Mayo-Belwa Mayo-Belwa Adamawa Local Government Area Local Government (LGA) Target Area (LGA) Target LGA TARGET LGA TARGET Demsa 1,170 DEMSA 78 Fufore 370 Jada FUFORE 41 Jada Ganye 0 GANYE 0 Girei 933 GIREI 16 Gombi 4,085 State Boundary GOMBI 33 State Boundary Guyuk 0 GUYUK 0 LGA Boundary Hong 16,941 HONG 6 Ganye Ganye LGA Boundary Jada 0 JADA 0 Not Targeted Lamurde 839 LAMURDE 6 Not Targeted Madagali 6,321 MADAGALI 119 % Reach Maiha 2,800 MAIHA 12 % REACH Mayo-Belwa 0 0 MAYO - BELWA 0 0 Michika 27,946 Toungo 0% MICHIKA 232 Toungo 0% 1 - 36 Mubi North 11,576 MUBI NORTH 154 1 - 5 Mubi South 11,821 MUBI SOUTH 139 37 - 78 Numan 2,250 NUMAN 14 6 - 11 Shelleng 0 SHELLENG 0 79 - 82 12 - 16 Song 1,437 SONG 21 Teungo 25 83 - 86 TOUNGO 6 17 - 27 Yola North 1,189 YOLA NORTH 14 Yola South 2,824 87 - 100 YOLA SOUTH 47 28 - 100 SOCIO-ECONOMICYobe REINTEGRATION REACH BY LGA MINEYobe RISK EDUCATION (MRE) REACH BY LGA Madagali Madagali R 0% I 0% ±
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Economics of Fresh and Smoked Fish Marketing in Some Local Government Areas in Adamawa State, Nigeria
    COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS OF FRESH AND SMOKED FISH MARKETING IN SOME LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS IN ADAMAWA STATE, NIGERIA. ONYIA, L.U., ADEBAYO, E.F., ADEWUYI, K.O., EKWUNIFE, E.G., OCHOKWU,I.J, OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION • INTRODUCTION • MATERIALS AND METHODS • RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS • CONCLUSIONS • RECOMMENDATIONS INTRODUCTION ü FISH IS A MAJOR SOURCE OF ANIMAL PROTEIN, ü ESSENTIAL FOOD ITEM IN THE DIET OF NIGERIANS (JIM-SAIKI AND OGUNBADEJO, 2003), ü AN IMPORTANT SOURCE OF LIFE AND LIVELIHOODS FOR MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD AND FOR THAT MATTER THE SELECTED COMMUNITIES, ü PROVIDES A SPENDABLE INCOME FOR MANY FAMILIES IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD (JERE AND MWENDO-PEHIRI, 2004). INTRODUCTION CONTINUED v IN NIGERIA, FISH IS SOLD TO CONSUMERS AS: ü FROZEN OR ICED, ü CURED (SMOKED), ü SUN DRIED, ü FRESH EITHER FROM A CULTURED POND OR FROM THE WILD. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY • TO IDENTIFY SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FISH MARKETERS • TO COMPARE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF FRESH AND SMOKED FISH ENTERPRISES IN THE STUDY AREAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS THE STUDY AREA ü SEVEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS OF ADAMAWA STATE (NGURORE, YOLA SOUTH, YOLA NORTH, GIREI, DEMSA, FUFORE AND NUMAN) WERE RANDOMLY SELECTED BASED ON THEIR PROXIMITY TO THE FISH LANDING SITES, ü DATA COLLECTED THROUGH WELL-STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE OF FRESH AND SMOKED FISH MARKETERS FROM 7 MARKETS, ü 286 QUESTIONNAIRES WERE RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE FISH MARKETERS. METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS • DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS IN TERMS OF FREQUENCIES AND PERCENTAGES • GROSS MARGIN ANALYSIS WAS USED TO DETERMINE
    [Show full text]
  • LGA Demsa Fufore Ganye Girei Gombi Guyukk Hong Jada Lamurde
    LGA Demsa Fufore Ganye Girei Gombi Guyukk Hong Jada Lamurde Madagali Maiha Mayo Belwa Michika Mubi North Mubi South Numan Toungo Shellenge Song Yola North Yola South PVC PICKUP ADDRESS Along Gombe Road, Demsa Town, Demsa Local Govt. Area Gurin Road, Adjacent Local Govt. Guest House, Fufore Local Govt. Area Along Federal Government College, Ganye Road, Ganye Lga Adjacent Local Govt. Guest Road, Girei Local Govt. Area Sangere Gombi, Aong Yola Road, Gombi L.G.A Palamale Nepa Ward Guyuk Town, Guyuk Local Govt. Area Opposite Cottage Hospital Shangui Ward, Hong Local Govt. Area Old Secretariat, Jada Along Ganye Road, Jada Lafiya Lamurde Road, Lamurde Local Govt. Area Palace Road, Gulak, Near Gulak Police Station, Madagali Lga Behind Local Govt. Secretariat, Mayonguli Ward, Maiha Jalingo Road Near Maternity Mayo Belwa Lga Michika Bye-Pass Zaibadari Ward Michika Lga Inside Local Govt. Secretariat, Mubi North Lumore Street, Opposite District Head's Palace, Gela, Mubi South Councilors Quarters, Off Jalingo Road, Numan Lga Barade Road, Oppoiste Sss Office, Toungo Old Local Govt Secretariat Street, Shelleng Town, Shelleng Lga Opp. Cattage Hospital Yola Road, Song Local Govt. Area No. 7 Demsawo Street, Demsawo Ward, Yola North Lga Yola Bye-Pass Fufore Road Opp. Aliyu Mustapha College, Bako Ward, Yola Town, Yola South Lga Yola Bye-Pass Fufore Road Opp. Aliyu Mustapha College, Bako Ward, Yola Town, Yola South Lga.
    [Show full text]
  • Adamawa - Health Sector Reporting Partners (April - June, 2020)
    Nigeria: Adamawa - Health Sector Reporting Partners (April - June, 2020) Number of Local Reporting PARTNERS PER TYPE Government Area Partners OF ORGANIZATIONS BREAKDOWN OF PEOPLE REACHED PER CATEGORY NGOs/UN People Reached PiN/Target IDP Returnee Host Agencies Community 21 Partners14 including 230,996 LGAs with ongoing International NGOs and activities 95,764 13,922 1,268 80,573 UN Agencies 11/3 212,433 DEMSA (4 Partners) MICHIKA (6 Partners) FSACI, IOM, JHF, WHO GZDI, IRC, JHF, PLAN, WHO, ZSF MADAGALI REACHED: 6,070 REACHED: 6,578 FUFORE (4 Partners) MUBI NORTH (7 Partners) MICHIKA GDZI, IOM, JHF, LESGO, PLAN, IOM, JHF, UNICEF, WHO SWOGE, WHO REACHED: 17,309 REACHED: 6,924 MUBI NORTH GANYE (2 Partners) MUBI SOUTH (6 Partners) HONG JHF GDZI, IOM, JHF, LESGO, RHHF, ZSF GOMBI MUBI SOUTH REACHED: - REACHED: 4,090 GIREI (4 Partners) NUMAN (1 Partner) SHELLENG JHF AGUF, IOM, JHF, WHO MAIHA REACHED: 22,348 REACHED: - SONG GUYUK GOMBI (3 Partners) SHELLENG (1 Partner) JHF GDZI, JHF, WHO LAMURDE REACHED: 220 REACHED: - GIREI GUYUK (2 Partners) SONG (2 Partners) NUMAN AGUF, JHF JHF DEMSA REACHED: - REACHED: 7,355 YOLA SOUTH YOLA NORTH HONG (3 Partners) TOUNGO (1 Partner) GDZI, JHF, WHO JHF MAYO FUFORE REACHED: 423 REACHED: - BELWA JADA (1 Partner) YOLA NORTH (4 Partners) HARAF, IOM, JHF, UNICEF JHF JADA REACHED: - REACHED: 1,224 LAMURDE (1 Partner) YOLA SOUTH (4 Partners) GANYE JHF IOM, JHF, SWOGE, UNICEF Number of Organizations REACHED: - REACHED: 7,355 (3 Partners) MADAGALI 1 7 JHF, PLAN, WHO TOUNGO REACHED: 4,537 MAIHA (2 Partners) JHF, WHO
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Information System Approach in Evaluating Security Challenges to Critical Infrastructures
    GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM APPROACH IN EVALUATING SECURITY CHALLENGES TO CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES A. N. Jatong, PhD Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Federal Polytechnic Mubi PMB 35, Mubi, Adamawa state, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In the past, criminality was a taboo and almost everybody franked at it and thus security challenges were so minimal or non-existent. Unfortunately it has now become a means of livelihood or a means to address disagreements where lives as well as critical infrastructures are destroyed mindlessly. While there are recognized occasional natural security challenges such as volcanic eruptions, Hurricane Katrina among others, most frequent security challenges are man-made organized and executed with cut edge professionalism and sophistication. Conventional methods and hence measures of monitoring and addressing various man-made security challenges have in the past been adopted by security operatives but criminals have always responded with sophisticated countermeasures and overwhelming successes maiming and massively in most cases destroying badly needed critical infrastructures. The intention of this research is to adopt Geographic Information System (GIS) approach, a real- time and speedy as well as reliable approach to address real-time security challenges to lives and critical infrastructures. In this method the study area was subdivided into geographic cells and an evaluation on each cell from some chosen observation posts were analyzed in a GIS environment to establish intervisibility to identified target location(s) which includes human habitations, critical infrastructures among others. Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was used as the platform for Line-Of-Sight (LOS) and Viewshed Analysis (VA).Observation points were selected on both high and lowlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Biometric Registration 4 December 2018
    State: LGA: Ward: DTM Dakri, Damare, Nigeria Adamawa Girei Girei Girei 1, Modire/Vinikilang Biometric Registration 4 December 2018 Yobe Total Registered Borno individuals households Gombe 16,479 6,327 Adamawa PPP Girei 1 76% 16% Cameroon Dakri SANGERE DUTSE _IDPs Women and Children Children under 5 years Taraba P SABON GARI P 43% 57% Male Female ± Girei 2 Girei 3% 11% Elderly People with ANGWAN KARA vulnerabilities P FEDERAL HOUSING P LGA of origin of registered individuals LGA % Household size distribution MADAGALI 40% % Damare % GWOZA 24% 20 20 BADIRISA/LAINDE MICHIKA 12% % P HONG 4% 5 BAJABURE 1 ASKIRA / UBA 3% % % P Modire 3 MUBI NORTH 2% 2 1 1 DAMBOA 2% NUMAN 2% % 9 BAMA 2% Others 10% % JABBORE 5 P % P 3 Registration site 1% Percentage of households Percentage 1% 1% Yola North 0 0.75 1.5 3 Km Ward boundary 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 Household size Recently concluded Biometric Registra�on in Girei Local Government Area (LGA), within the period of 13 November – 28 November 2018, has brought the total number of Returnees and Displaced persons in Girei (LGA) to 16,476 individuals (6,327 households). The average family size within the loca�on is 3, with 33 per cent of families comprising of 1 - 2 members; 35 per cent comprising of 3 - 4 members; 21 per cent comprising of 5-6 members; 8 per cent comprising of 7-8 members; and 3 per cent comprising of 9 and above members. During the registra�on exercise, the enumerators collected vulnerability data to iden�fy individuals who may require addi�onal humanitarian assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Week 29 Report
    CCCM - NIGERIA Multi Sector Tracker weekly report Date of report 29 July 2017 17 to 23 July 2017 (Week 29) INTRODUCTION The site tracker is a weekly gap analysis and monitoring of services tool used by the site facilitators and site management agencies, in support of the Government camp management agencies and in areas with no camp managers, to identify and refer gaps in delivery and assistance in IDP sites. It enables stakeholders to track activities and avoid duplication of eorts, in support of the sectors as a basis of follow-up on quality of services delivered. It contributes to speed up the time of response by concerned partners and avoid unnecessary delays. As of July 2017, over 87 camps are covered in Borno and Adamawa by the IOM site facilitators in support of the Government Site Managers, either dedicated or mobile team, to strengthen camp management mechanisms and coordination of delivery. The areas sites covered are located in the following LGAs: Girei,Yola South, Yola North and Fufore. The report must not be misconstrued to represent the situation of all IDP camps in North-eastern Nigeria and covers only the sites in review during the week. 17 Sites in, GIREI, YOLA NORTH and YOLA SOUTH LGAs in ADAMAWA State in review this week GIREI EYN CHURCH VINIKILANG, SEGERE DUTSE, CHEKAMIDERI, LOWCOST QUARTERS, NANA VILLA, UNGWAN ABUJA FUFORE DAWARE CAMP, WURO AHI, FUFORE CAMP YOLA ST. THERESAS CATHEDRAL NORTH YOLA MALKOHI CAMP, DOKKITILLA WUROCHEKKE, HULLERE, SABON DEAL NGURORE, MALKOHI VILLAGE, KILBAJE EXTENSION SOUTH Yobe Borno Adamawa
    [Show full text]
  • Borno Cameroon
    NIGERIA: GENDER BASED VIOLENCE SUB SECTOR OPERATIONAL PRESENCE ADAMAWA STATE - MARCH, 2019 Date: 24-April-19 Gulak Plan/LHI BORNO 7 LGAs Covered Co�age Hosp.Gulak Duhu/Shuwa Plan/LHI Partners Madzi 5 Plan/LHI ± Jigalambu IRC 36Health Facilities* Bazza Margi IRC Mayo Bani Minksi/Wuri Ngiki IRC IRC Kolere MADAGALI GZDI, IOM Michika IRC Digil IOM, IRC Michika II Shangui Mujara General Hospital Michika IRC MICHIKA Hong General Hospital Futudou/Futules MICHIKA Plan/LHI Guyaku Vi/Boka Guyaku Primary Health Care MUBI NORTH Plan/LHI HONG Digil Muchalla MUBI NORTH Betso Garkida Kolere General Hospital Garkida Bahuli SatamIRC Health Clinic MUBI SOUTH Duwa MUBI SOUTH GOMBI HONG Mijilu Fo�a PHCC GOMBI GZDI Gombi South Lokuwa Nyailo PHCC IOM, IRC MAIHA Lokuwa PHC SHELLENG Bahuli Guyuk MAIHA SONG Plan/LHI Co�age Hospital Guyuk Mujara Guyuk PHCC SONG IOM GUYUK Gella GUYUK Gyawana GZDI, IRC Gyawana PHCC Nassarawo IOM LAMURDELAMURDE General Hospital Mubi GIREI DEMSA GIREI Mayonguli SabonDuhu Pegi NUMAN Mayonguli PHCC Numan General Hospital NUMAN YOLAYOLA SOUTH SOUTH Song Gari NassarawoDuhu Clinic B Health Clinic Yola Specialist Hospital Wuro Dole YOLAYOLA NORTH NORTH J/Lamba PHCC Waduku PariyaDuhu Tingno Dutse PHCC IOM MAYO-BELWA Girei II ToungoDuhu IOM Meddy Private Clinic FUFORE FUFORE Girei B PHCC Namtari Gereng IOM Gereng PHCC Wuro Jabbe PHCC KomaDuhu II BodeDuhu Yolde Pate NAPTIP Modire Yolde PHCC JADA JADA FMC Yola IOM JADA Co�. Hosp. Fufore Fufore CAMEROON IOM Vunoklang PHCC KomaDuhu I NAPTIP GANYEGANYE Karewa New Boshang Hospital Ltd Zenith Care Consultant Ajiya Ajiya PHCC TONGUNO Jada II Jada I PHCC Ganye I Old Market Health Clinic Women and Girls Friendly Space Functional RPs Functional Health Facility (HF) providing CMR- For feedback, please contact SV-IPV services 1:1,753,895 Kilometers Coordiantor, Sylvia Opinia:- [email protected] SS/HF presence IMO, Toyese Oyelade:- [email protected] 0 12.5 25 50 75 100 No presence Data Source:- GBVSWG 5Ws.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case for the Political Redistricting of Adamawa State, Nigeria
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 19, Issue 1, Ver. II (Jan. 2014), PP 12-24 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org The Geography of Politics: A Case for the Political Redistricting of Adamawa State, Nigeria AbdullahiLimanTukur ,Mohammed MahmudBarde Department of Geography,School of Environmental Sciences,ModibboAdama University of Technology Yola,Adamawa State Nigeria Abstract: This paper examines current political representations in Adamawa State in the light of democratic principles of fairness, justice and equity to propose a redistricting of the state with a view to redressing imbalances and deviations from standard practices and the law. It is argued that the current situation where an area is being represented by six members in the state assembly and one member at the federal house of representative on the one hand and another area represented by two members in the state assembly and one member at the federal house of representative on the other hand is not only absurd, lopsided and illogical but also cannot be said to be democratic. This situation has created and sustained feelings of marginalization and deprivation. A redistricting that redresses such imbalances and inequities is proposed using standard criteria,within a Geographic Information System environment, to achieve democratic imperatives of fairness and justice. Key Words: Redistricting Adamawa, democratic fairness, justice I. Introduction Early on return to civil rule in Nigeria in 1999 notable international agencies concerned with democracy and development; such as the Commonwealths Office, the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) and the United Nations Electoral Assistance Division (UNEAD), were approached to help review Nigeria‟s electoral arrangement with a view to achieving a realistic electoral reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Cameroon Chad
    Nigeria: Adamawa State - Education Operational Presence Overview (June 2020) Jigawa TOTAL PARTNERS NUMBER OF LOCAL Yobe Kano GOVERNMENT Partners with Ongoing and AREAS Madagali 5 Completed Activities Borno out 16 of 21 Michika AUN: MoE, RoHI 2 2 - 1 LGAs with partners Michika Bauchi GOV NNGO INGO UN activities Gombe Hong Mubi North Kaduna Gombi Mubi South Number of Partner Activities per LGAs Fufore Ganye Jada Shelleng Yola South Numan Song Maiha Mubi North Guyuk 4 Guyuk Toungo Mayo - Belwa Girei Lamurde Yola North Song Michika Girei Chad Hong Numan Shelleng Demsa Adamawa Mubi South 1 Nigeria Yola South 0 50 100 150 200 250Plateau Yola North UNICEF: SUBEB Monthly Activity Trend Mayo-Belwa Girei, Mubi North, Yola South, Mayo-Belwa, Fufore Jada 1000 800 AUNCameroon: MoE, UNICEF: SUBEB 600 Jada Fufore, Ganye, Guyuk, Numan, Song, Toungo, Yola North 400 Nasarawa 200 Ganaye AUN: MoE 0 Taraba January February March April May Hong, Mubi South, Shelleng Toungo Number of ORGANIZATION ACRONYMS Organisations 0 6 - 8 AUN American University of Nigeria 9 - 18 RoHI Restoration of Hope Initiative 1 - 3 4 - 5 MoE Ministry of Education SUBEB State Universal Basic Education Board Niger UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund Chad Burkina Faso Benin Benue Nigeria Togo Ghana Cameroon Reporting Partner: Implementing Partner Central African Republic Equatorial Guinea Update: 20 June 2020 Sources: Partners 5Ws submission on reporthub.org Feedback: [email protected], [email protected] For more information: www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/nigeria/education The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map/infographic do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • 344153-Eng.Pdf (‎1.133Mo)
    AFRICAN PROGRAM FOR ONCHOCERCIASIS CONTROL (APOC) YEAR l REPORT ON COMMT]NITY DIRECTED TREATMENT WITHIYERMECTIN (cDrr) I L. ,i Action lo: -l c t ,r.9,, c!,r, ,.i. ' ";-'t' t 't _'t \ , ('f l r A,i ,' / )-l €ri+ j,/.8.$o For lnformotlon To, ;r p JUNE, 1999 TO MAY , 2000. ADAMAWA STATE on the 1. BAqKGRo:**D#?ilXl#IStonsola State in August leel is located Adamawa State, crt northeastern Part of Nigeria' llyzo and 14 !/ao East:' 7o 28r and 10o 551 and longitude The State "lies between latitude ^gtttteg TherearelllocalGovernmentCouncilareas(LGAs).TheStatelieswithintwonotabletfi"" a1a spafe trees in the the sub-SuOon Su'unnatr *itf' rhe vesetational zones, ,iirQ ;'itn in the southern zone' nolth.rn part and,i,.'E i"r*"S.;;".h where three major rivers along the camerooniui-iora","rl^9fi;;t presence of few d;J;;ntains 'l"t"i;ffi';,t* These with has given th, .watercourses for and have their sources ji"ri,r," .ntiir"trd;"* luna ur.u into arable place traversed and.turriJ their tributaries have Damnosum' breeding sites for the Similium agriculturat activitill ;;;;" The rainy season begins in the dry and the rainy seasons. The state has two main seasons, tsq in the northern parts and ;,* l%i*.;;;1f4i'"; wettest April and ends in ;il'b;i;t* and" Toungo LGAs' The in the southern part, parti^cyiarif?i"rq fanye The dry l0l lmm rainfalls' *"lLugutt aid' September' signify the perio-d of ftJni"'t January and months, which oo"urr? ooJi, *i tt th; ;#J months being season starts rror,r'iti" "ro'oi il;",y when humidity is as low as l3o/o' groups Their rural cultures' languages and dialect State is multi-ethnic with varied not along socro- The ,utJriitJ'grt"prl*f,ich are often than settrements are in large and ,.un cultural, and language lineage' together by their natural hospitality, diversity the peopre are still bound Despite this apparent tgi'''on languages Hausa and d; St'te and ft* 'like as political/administrati"vl'r,."iur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idp Situation in North-Eastern Nigeria
    DTM Nigeria THE IDP SITUATION IN NORTH‐EASTERN NIGERIA (Adamawa, Bauchi, Gombe, Taraba, Yobe) DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX REPORT (DTM) December 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 389,281 IDPs (60,232 households) were identified in in Adamawa, Bauchi, Gombe, Taraba and Yobe states. The highest number of IDPs are in Yobe (125,991 IDPs), followed by Adamawa (123,601 IDPs) and Taraba (81,790 IDPs). The IDP population is composed of 54 % women and 46% men. 58% of the total IDP population are children of which more than half are up to 5 years old, while 42% are adults. 77% of IDPs were displaced by the insurgency. The majority of the current IDP population was displaced in 2014 (81%). The IDPs come mainly from Adamawa (37.7%), Borno (20.3%) and Yobe (20%). 92.4% of IDPs live with host families while 7.6% live in camps. 1 DTM Nigeria INTRODUCTION Nigeria has experienced recurring conflicts and natural disasters which have caused many people to flee their homes. In 2014, the escalating violence caused by the Boko Haram insurgency in the north eastern region has led to an increase in the number of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), especially in Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe and Taraba States. According to the United Nations multi‐sectoral needs assessment conducted in May 2014, there were 650.000 IDPs1 in the northeast region of Nigeria. In December 2014, the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) reported that 868,335 IDPs2 had been displaced in the country. The data presented in this report is the result of the assessments conducted as part of the Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) program with the objective to support the Government of Nigeria in establishing a comprehensive system to collect and disseminate data on IDPs by strengthening the capacity of State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) offices, Contents Nigerian Red Cross Society (NRCS) and other partners in the field to Introduction 2 undertake IDP assessments in a unified and systematized manner.
    [Show full text]