PRECARIOUS WORK: • Its Dangers to Workers • How We Can Fight It

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PRECARIOUS WORK: • Its dangers to workers • How we can fight it If you are looking for a job these days, then you already know all about precarious work . It’s almost impossible to find a “normal” job: with steady, full-time hours, a decent wage, and benefits. Instead, most jobs seem to be insecure, short- term, and poorly-paid. There aren’t many jobs out there – and most of the available jobs are pretty lousy. All these forms of precarious What is Precarious Work? work have one thing in com - mon: Workers are forced to bear A precarious job is employment that offers compensation, the risk of any downturn in the hours, or security inferior to a “regular” job. Precarious work employer’s business (because comes in many forms: workers can be disposed of immediately when they’re no longer needed). Yet even when Agency work: Instead of working Seasonal work: You’re employed they are working, workers can’t directly for the employer, you work only in particular seasons when busi - plan their lives or support their for an employment agency (who ness is booming. families: their hours and sched - creams several dollars per hour off of ules are undependable, and Home-work: You do your job from your your wages!). their pay and benefits are rock- own home – fitting work into “free time” bottom. Many of these jobs fail Temporary work: The job only lasts around domestic duties (and paying for to pay normal employment ben - for a few days, weeks, or months. It’s the building and utilities yourself!). efits like health, life insurance, “just-in-time” labour: you work only sick pay, or pensions. Self-employment: Instead of putting as long as the boss needs you. you on the payroll, you’re paid to com - Contracting out : Instead of having plete a contract – and considered regular employees, jobs are con - “self-employed” but still depend on the tracted out to suppliers. boss for all your work . Casual or ‘on-call’ work: You’re Part-Time: Many part-time jobs offer called in only at the employer’s precarious conditions and many “part- request – so you never know ahead of timers” would prefer full-time work, time when you’ll be working. with regular shifts. Who’s Precarious? What is a Good Job, Anyway? Researchers believe that less When we fight against the spread of precarious work, we are fighting to than two-thirds of employed defend the standards of a “good job.” Our goal is a job that offers ade - workers still enjoy a “regular” quate income, security, and stability, so that workers can support their job (full -time, steady work with families and enjoy a decent, full life. benefits). The rest have been Here are the key things we look for in a “good job”: forced into precarious jobs of • Decent pay that allows an adequate, secure standard of living for work - one form or another. ers and their families, and full participation in society. In Canada today, almost one in • Regular, predictable, year-round hours. No excessive overtime. five employed workers is part- • Access to full-time hours for those who want them. time; that’s up dramatically over Health, insurance, and pension benefits (including for part-time workers). the last two decades. One in • six workers are “self-em - • Excellent health and safety conditions and training; comfortable ployed,” many working in very working conditions. poor conditions. Many more • Workplace protection (including against arbitrary punishment or dis - Canadians work in temporary or missal) and elected representation. contract positions. • Equal, fair treatment at work; freedom from harassment or discrimination. Women have always been most • Paid time off work for holidays and vacation; family care needs and per - subject to precarious work. sonal days; and life-long education and training. Employers take advantage of • Meaningful and productive work, that allows for personal development. women’s struggle to balance Naturally, decent wages top the list of these features of a “good job.” But worklife and family duties. But keep in mind: you could earn an hourly wage that seems attractive, yet you the goal is not making work could be hurt by inadequate or unreliable hours, or because you have to pay manageable for women. The for benefits out of your own pocket. So better wages are crucial to the strug - goal is cheap labour. gle for good jobs – but that struggle must also address hours, benefits, Workers of colour and new security, and representation . Canadians have also been very vulnerable to precarious work. A Global Fight: But precarious work strate gies Unions around the world are fighting are now creeping into traditional precarious work. For example, the International Metalworkers Federation sectors of the economy (IMF), to which the CAW belongs, has (like manufacturing), and made the fight against precarious affecting more men, too. work its top priority for organizing, For example, top global bargaining, and lobbying. companies like Toyota October 7 was the World Day for Decent now use contract workers Work , supported by the CAW and unions around the world. to make up 30% or more of See www.imfmetal.org their workforce. 2 for more information. Why Precarious? Precarious work has grown dramatically in recent years, for many reasons: Intense competition: Employers, fighting to survive in a dog-eat-dog economy, squeeze every last cent out of their labour costs. Globalization: To compete with low-cost imports, of goods and services employers try to drive down their own workers to ‘third world’ standards. ‘Flexibility’: In a volatile economy, employers hesitate to take on permanent em - Fighting Precarious Work at the ployees. Bargaining Table Unemployment and recession: When labour markets are weak, and Union members have a special opportunity, and a responsibility, unemployed workers are especially to fight precarious work through collective bargaining. desperate, precarious work becomes more common. Employers know that Some of the contract clauses we fight for include: workers will take any job, no matter how precarious. • Wages sufficient to adequately support workers and their families. Government neglect: • Benefits for part-time workers (eg. full health care coverage). Governments have largely accepted Clear rules regarding hours of work, including maximizing hours the logic that employers should be • free to set employment conditions, (scheduled by seniority), limits on overtime, minimum call-in periods with very little regulation or oversight. (at least 4 hours), and minimum notice of schedule changes. To prevent this kind of excess Provisions to convert part-time or irregular jobs into permanent, full- • competition from driving down time jobs. Limit the number or ratio of part-timers. working conditions and the qual - • Recognition clauses must not exclude temporary or contract workers. ity of work life, governments must • Restrictions on temporary or contract workers, the abuse of “proba - play a more active role (see p.4). tion” periods, and out-sourcing. • Health and safety training to ensure that everyone (including new or temporary workers) is safe. • Protect good jobs during economic downturns through EI work-sharing. If you have other examples of contract provisions that can put limits on precarious work, please send them to the CAW Research Department at [email protected] so we can share them with others! 3 Fighting Precarious Work in the Political Arena We fight at the bargaining table to protect our members against precarious work, with language on job security, contract work, part-time work, hours, and bene - We Can Stop fits. But the quality of our jobs also reflects trends in broader economic and social conditions. That’s why it’s essential for CAW members to be fully active in Precarious Work! the political arena, fighting for economic and social policies that lift up employ - The relentless expansion of precar - ment standards and limit precarious work, for the benefit of all workers. ious work is undermining the Here are some of the demands we will put to governments at all levels, to stop this bargaining power and the working precarious “race to the bottom”: conditions of all workers. That’s • Reduce unemployment, and strengthen Employment Insurance and social why the CAW is making it a prior - assistance: Precarious work is more common in tough economic times, when ity: in our bargaining, our political desperate workers will take whatever employers offer. action, and our education. We must monitor the expansion of • Rules on hours of work: Government employment standards should set out precarious work, understand its basic rules allowing for more stability and predictability in working hours – dangers, and find ways to defend including minimum call-in periods (4 hours or more), and minimum notice for the ideal of a “good job.” changing work schedules. Regulating employment agencies: Agencies profit from the desperation of To win this fight, we will: • workers, creaming outrageous amounts off their hard-earned paycheques. On • Strengthen our work with laid-off average, agency workers make 40% less than the permanent workers they CAW members, through our work beside. Standards must be implemented to stop this exploitation, and Action Centres and other forums. ensure basic fairness in agency work (including stopping illegal deductions, access to paid holidays and vacations, and having freedom to apply for per - • Build alliances with community manent jobs with the same employer). partners and other unions to fight for good jobs. • Legally clarifying the “employer”: Ultimate responsibility for the fair treat - ment of workers (including payment of wages and benefits, health and safety • Push governments to close the protection, holiday pay, and other standards) must lie with the final employer loopholes that allow precarious as well as with any employment agency. Employers can’t “outsource” their workers to be exploited.
Recommended publications
  • Bay Area Apprenticeship Guidebook

    Bay Area Apprenticeship Guidebook

    Alameda • Contra Costa • Marin • Napa • San Fransisco • San Mateo • Santa Clara • Solano Bay Area Construction Apprenticeship Guidebook Bay Area Construction Apprenticeship Guidebook View online at www.ctwi-btca.org Produced by Construction Trades Workforce Initiative, with the generous support and collaboration of many organizations and individuals. We would especially like to thank the many union apprenticeship coordinators and training directors across the region who contributed information and reviewed content, as well as pre-apprenticeship leaders who prepared materials for their organizations’ profiles. Key Partners Alameda County Building Contra Costa Napa-Solano & Construction Trades Building & Construction Building & Construction Council Trades Council Trades Council Bay Area Oakland Apprenticeship Coordinators Workforce Development Association Board Special thanks to Jon Bersche and the City of Seattle for providing the model for this project, and for so graciously granting permission to adapt some of their materials. On the Cover Juju Ruiz is a union sheet metal apprentice currently working on installing ductwork for the new BART headquarters near Lake Merritt in Oakland. Although she loved the idea of working in construction, she was unsure about how to pursue this career path. After enrolling and graduating from Rising Sun Center for Opportunity’s all-female MC3 pre-apprenticeship program, Women Building the Bay, Juju felt prepared to enter the construction trades. Now, she feels empowered as a mother and career woman to support her family doing work that she is passionate about. Dear Valued Community Members, Far too many people in the Bay Area are unaware of career opportunities in the union construction trades. As the non-profit partner of the Building and Construction Trades Councils in Alameda, Contra Costa, Napa and Solano counties, Construction Trades Workforce Initiative (CTWI) is the regional leader in bridging the gap between organized labor and community stakeholders.
  • The Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J

    The Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J

    Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal Volume 16 | Issue 1 Article 1 1998 Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J. Van Bourg Ellyn Moscowitz Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Van Bourg, Victor J. and Moscowitz, Ellyn (1998) "Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace," Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal: Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 1. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol16/iss1/1 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Van Bourg and Moscowitz: Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placin HOFSTRA LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW JOURNAL Volume 16, No. 1 Fall 1998 ARTICLES SALTING THE MINES: THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PLACING PAID UNION ORGANIZERS IN THE EMPLOYER'S WORKPLACE* Victor J. Van Bourg** Ellyn Moscowitz*** Mr. Chairman .... Thank you for Mr. Chairman, I rise to strongly the opportunity to speak today. I oppose H.R. 3246, mistakenly am here to discuss the serious called the Fairness for Small Busi- * This article was made possible, in part, by a summer research grant from Chapman Uni- versity School of Law, while Ellyn Moscowitz was an Associate Professor of Law there.
  • The Struggles of Iregularly-Employed Workers in South Korea, 1999-20121

    The Struggles of Iregularly-Employed Workers in South Korea, 1999-20121

    1 The Struggles of Iregularly-Employed Workers in South Korea, 1999-20121 Jennifer Jihye Chun Department of Sociology University of Toronto [email protected] November 25, 2013 In December 1999, two years after the South Korean government accepted a $58.4 billion bailout package from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), President Kim Dae-Jung announced that the nation’s currency crisis was officially over. The South Korean government’s aggressive measures to stabilize financial markets, which included drastic efforts to reduce labor costs, dismantle employment security, and legalize indirect forms of dispatch or temporary employment, contributed to the fastest recovery of a single country after the 1997 Asian Debt Crisis, restoring annual GDP growth rates to pre-crisis levels.2 While the business community praised such efforts for helping debt-ridden banks and companies survive the crisis, labor unions and other proponents of social and economic justice virulently condemned the government’s neoliberal policy agenda for subjecting workers to deepening inequality and injustice. Despite differing opinions on the impact of government austerity measures, both sides agree that the “post-IMF” era is synonymous with a new world of work. Employment precarity – that is, the vulnerability of workers to an array of cost-cutting employer practices that depress wage standards, working conditions and job and income security – is a defining feature of the 21st century South Korean economy. The majority of jobs in the labor market consist of informal and precarious jobs that provide minimal, if any, legal protection against unjust and discriminatory employment practices. Informally- and precariously- employed workers also face numerous barriers to challenging deteriorating working conditions and heightened employer abuses through the conventional repertoire of unionism: strikes, collective bargaining and union agreements.
  • A Century of Struggle

    A Century of Struggle

    A Century of Struggle To mark the 100th anniversary of the formation of the American Federation of Labor, the National Museum of American History of the Smithsonian Institution invited a group of scholars and practitioners "to examine the work, technology, and culture of industrial America . " The conference was produced in cooperation with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations . The excerpts on the following pages are drawn from papers and comments at that conference, in the Museum's Carmichael Auditorium, November IS and 16, 1986. Mary Kay Rieg, Olivia G. Amiss, and Marsha Domzalski of the Monthly Labor Review provided editorial assistance. Trade unions mirror society in conflict between collectivism and individualism A duality common to many institutions runs through the American labor movement and has marked its shifting fortunes from the post-Civil War period to the present ALICE KESSLER-HARRIS ideology of American trade unions as they developed in Two competing ideas run through the labor movement, as and post-Civil War period. It also tells us something of their they have run through the American past. The first is the the The conglomeration of unions that formed the Na- notion of community-the sense that liberty is nurtured in impact . Union and the 15,000 assemblies of the an informal political environment where the voluntary and tional Labor of Labor responded to the onslaught of industrial- collective enterprise of people with common interests con- Knights the Civil War by searching for ways to reestablish tributes to the solution of problems . Best characterized by ism after of interest that was threatened by a new and the town meeting, collective solutions are echoed in the the community organization of work.
  • Liberty Template

    Liberty Template

    Vol. 16 No 5 December 2017 ISSN 0791-458X Brexit Protecting 2017 the year of breakthrough Whistleblowers women’s football Page 10 Page 13 Page 30 More action needed to curb precarious work by Scott Millar Long awaited government proposals to change em- ployment law in order to provide greater security for workers, have been described by trade unions as a step in the right direction but in need of amendment if they are to provide adequate protections against precarious work practices. The Employment (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2017 was published on 7th December. The Bill proposes to make it mandatory that workers are provided with their core terms of employment within five days of beginning a job. The legislation will also ban zero hours contracts “in most circumstances”, with exceptions including to allow employers to provide cover in emergency situations or to cover short-term absences. SIPTU Services Division Organiser, Ethel Buckley, said: “While there are positive aspects to these proposals more must be done to protect SIPTU members Liz Cloherty, Maria Power and Stephanie Lee calling on the Government to give Section 39 workers’ pay workers against the rapid expansion in precarious work practices. justice outside Leinster House on Wednesday, 8th November 2017. See page 15. Photo: Rolling News SIPTU is focused on this issue because it affects a growing number of workers. “As part of our Fighting for the Future of Work campaign our mem- bers are calling for a remedial social statute which will put right the social wrong of precarious work and provide workers with an entitle- 2017 Highlights Crossword ment to security of hours.” Page 16-17 Page 31 She added: “Together with ICTU, we are campaigning for amend- ments to this Bill so that the scope of its ban on zero hours contracts Continued on page 2 WORKERS RIGHTS CENTRE 8.30 a.m.
  • A New Peonage?: Debt Enforcement As Labor Regulation in the Era of Precarious Work in Preparation for Noah Zatz Zatz@Law.Ucla.Edu

    A New Peonage?: Debt Enforcement As Labor Regulation in the Era of Precarious Work in Preparation for Noah Zatz [email protected]

    A New Peonage?: Debt Enforcement as Labor Regulation in the Era of Precarious Work in preparation for Noah Zatz [email protected] The Thirteenth Amendment Through the Lens of Class and Labor @ Seattle University School of Law Dear Colleagues: I eagerly await our conversations in Seattle. Unfortunately, I am behind schedule on my paper. What I am sending you below is the closely related paper I am presenting two days before at Law & Society. For our conference, I plan to focus in more detail on the child-support enforcement cases and their 13th amendment analysis, so this provides the big picture within which that line of analysis is situated. Thanks Noah “Precarious Work in the Carceral State: Seeing the Invisible Fist” Noah Zatz for presentation at the Law & Society Ass’n Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA May 30, 2015 Preliminary draft as of May 15, 2015 * * * Not for circulation * * * [PP blank] The subtitle’s phrase “invisible fist” of course plays on the notion of the invisible hand by which market outcomes supposedly are produced from the aggregation of private decisions unmolested by the state. What we want to explore 1 here, building on a long tradition of doubting the public/private divide between state and economy, is the extent to which so-called market outcomes are produced through the threat or application of state violence, the strike of the fist. Invisibility here does not connote intangibility, but instead marks the relative absence of state violence from conventional accounts of labor market inequality, including accounts in broadly critical and progressive veins.
  • Precarious Work and Human Rights

    Precarious Work and Human Rights

    International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations 8 Rampe du Pont Rouge, Petit Lancy, CH-1213 Geneva, Switzerland Tel : +41 22 793 22 33 ; Fax : +41 22 793 22 38 ; e-mail :[email protected]; www.iuf.org Precarious Work: Undermining Human Rights Any meaningful investigation of the relationship between business and human rights must address the rights impact of the accelerating dissolution of what the ILO and others refer to as the "standard employment relationship" (i.e. direct, permanent employment) and the rise of precarious work. This note does not attempt to account for the role of institutions like the World Bank and the OECD in pushing for even more precarious work relations, rewarding and rating countries for their efforts to abolish direct employment. Agriculture, which still has the world's largest work force, is almost entirely built on precarious labour, and there is a vital connection between this and the fact that agricultural workers who help to feed the world are often among the most food insecure. The relationship between poverty and deepening inequality, and the growth of precarious work in rich and poor countries alike, has been well documented. The purpose here is to highlight a phenomenon which has not received the attention it requires, i.e. the increasingly widespread use of indirect, precarious employment relations to weaken trade union organization and bargaining power. It is in this context that precarious work emerges as a fundamental human rights issue demanding a strong response rooted in a comprehensive human rights framework. The ILO defines the standard employment relationship in these terms: The traditional pattern of the employment relationship, or standard employment relationship, has for many years been that of full time work, under a contract of employment for unlimited duration, with a single employer, and protected against unjustified dismissal.
  • Feminist Trade Unionism and Post-Work Imaginaries

    Feminist Trade Unionism and Post-Work Imaginaries

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Journal of Applied Social Theory Journal of Applied Social Theory | Article ______________________________________________________________________ Feminist trade unionism and post-work imaginaries Dr Lena Wånggren* Department of English Literature, University of Edinburgh, UK Vol 1, No 2 (2018), 102 - 124 __________________________________________________________ The online version of this text can be found at socialtheoryapplied.com/journal/ Feminist academics in the marketised university are doing not only unpaid emotional and social work, but other unpaid work which makes up the core business of the institution. In a culture of overwork and increased demands for productivity, teaching, research, and administration cannot fit into contracted hours so are done at nights and weekends. This article highlights the gendered impacts of current working conditions, focusing specifically on the conditions of precariously employed researchers and educators in the UK higher education system. Emphasising the unpaid work done by feminists in academia and beyond, this article suggests looking toward a post-work imaginary as one strategy to make possible more inclusive and accessible educational futures. Sharing feminist trade unionist strategies through which to question some of the unrealistic demands put upon university staff, the article emphasises the need for a feminist ethics of care to build sustainable movements and futures. Keywords feminism, higher education, trade unions, post-work, neoliberalism, casualisation * Email: [email protected] 102 Journal of Applied Social Theory, Vol. 1, 2018 While feminist, antiracist and other critical pedagogies might offer possibilities for countering market-driven models of education, academic staff are faced with increasing workloads and insecure working conditions, making not only such labour- intensive pedagogies but also other forms of activism harder to fit in alongside paid work.
  • Labor Rights Violations in Vietnam's Export Manufacturing Sector

    Labor Rights Violations in Vietnam's Export Manufacturing Sector

    Labor Rights Violations in Vietnam’s Export Manufacturing Sector Worker Rights Consortium May 2013 Made in Vietnam Labor Rights Violations in Vietnam’s Export Manufacturing Sector Worker Rights Consortium May 2013 Contents I. Introduction........................................1 II. Sources ...........................................4 III. Issues............................................5 A. Violations of Freedom of Association ................5 B. Forced Labor ..................................10 C. Child Labor ...................................11 D. Gender Discrimination ..........................12 E. Unsafe Working Conditions ......................13 F. Excessive Working Hours ........................14 G. Inadequate Wages ..............................15 H. Precarious Work ...............................17 I. “Wage Theft” and Failure to Enforce Labor Laws ....18 IV. Conclusion.......................................20 Made in Vietnam CREATIVE COMMONS: NTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATON I. Introduction THIS IS A BRIEFING paper for Worker Rights Consortium affiliate universities and colleges and their licensees concerning the labor rights environment in Vietnam and, in particular, its export garment manufacturing industry, a sector which includes the production of collegiate licensed apparel. As of March 2013, Vietnam was second only to China in the number of factories (185) that have been disclosed to the WRC by licensees as locations for the manufacture of collegiate products outside the United States.1 Likewise, over the previous
  • Precarious Work in Asia Pacific Has Been Identified by Trade Unions Across the Region As a Central Concern for Working People

    Precarious Work in Asia Pacific Has Been Identified by Trade Unions Across the Region As a Central Concern for Working People

    A 10 country study by The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) and ITUC Asia-Pacific 2014 Asia Pacific Region Precarious work in the work Precarious FOREWARD ..........................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................7 COUNTRY PROFILES ...........................................................................................................................13 Australia .............................................................................................................................................14 Cambodia ...........................................................................................................................................19 Indonesia............................................................................................................................................23 Japan .................................................................................................................................................29 Contents Korea, Republic of ...............................................................................................................................37 Nepal .................................................................................................................................................47 New Zealand ......................................................................................................................................52
  • Local Officers' Resource Manual

    Local Officers' Resource Manual

    Dear Colleagues: Congratulations on your election. You take office at one of the most critical moments in the history of our country and union. This moment calls for bold leadership as our union responds to three intersecting crises. We are living in an era of extreme economic inequality and Corporate Power. We have seen the largest redistribution of wealth in our nation’s history and the lowest unionized workforce in decades. In 2020 we also faced the threat, destruction, and tragedy of the COVID-19 pandemic. Amidst the devastation of COVID-19, we have found ourselves confronting the plague of racism in America, which has been rampaging in our communities since long before the pandemic. I have been proud of the actions our union has taken to dismantle anti-Black racism and we have so much more work to do. I know that together we are up to the task of confronting these challenges. We can continue building our union’s power through new organizing, bargaining strong contracts, and building independent political power behind a working class agenda. As unprecedented as the COVID-19 pandemic is, CWAers have been on the front lines every day, keeping people informed, connected, and safe during this difficult time. And if we are to make progress in tearing down racism in this country and in our union, we must listen to the experiences of Black CWA members and all Black workers. Every white union member, Black union member, Latino union member, and every ally must fight and organize for Black lives. Unions have a duty to fight for power, dignity and the right to live for every working-class person in every place.
  • FILING. 301 LMRA Complaint Against Local 636 10-23-2020

    FILING. 301 LMRA Complaint Against Local 636 10-23-2020

    Case 2:20-cv-01609-CCW Document 1 Filed 10/26/20 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OK GROCERY COMPANY, ) a division of Giant Eagle, Inc. ) ELECTRONICALLY FILED ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) 2:20-cv-1609 ) TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 636, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, OK Grocery Company, a division of Giant Eagle, Inc. (hereinafter “OK Grocery” or “the Company”), by its undersigned counsel, in support of its Complaint, alleges the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a civil action brought pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (the “LMRA”), to enforce the no strike provisions of a collective bargaining agreement. 2. OK Grocery seeks a declaration that: the actions of the Teamsters Local Union No. 636 (hereinafter “Local 636” or “the Union”) described herein are in violation of the Company and Union’s collective bargaining agreement and an Order requiring that the conduct immediately cease; an award to OK Grocery of monetary damages to compensate it for losses, including, but not limited to increased attendance and morale issues, loss of productivity, Case 2:20-cv-01609-CCW Document 1 Filed 10/26/20 Page 2 of 7 additional overtime, and late deliveries to stores that would not have otherwise been incurred; an award to OK Grocery for its fees, expenses, costs, and disbursements arising from the filing of this action, including attorneys’ fees incurred; and any other relief as the Court deems just and proper. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Section 301 of the LMRA, without regard to the amount in controversy or the parties’ citizenship.