DOCSLIB.ORG

On Evolution Equations in Banach Spaces and Commuting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Evolution Equations in Banach Spaces and Commuting ON EVOLUTION EQUATIONS IN BANACH SPACES AND COMMUTING SEMIGROUPS A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Saud M. A. Alsulami June 2005 This dissertation entitled ON EVOLUTION EQUATIONS IN BANACH SPACES AND COMMUTING SEMIGROUPS by SAUD M. A. ALSULAMI has been approved for the Department of Mathematics and the College of Arts and Sciences by Quoc-Phong Vu Professor of Mathematics Leslie A. Flemming Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ALSULAMI, SAUD M. A. Ph.D. June 2005. Mathematics On Evolution Equations In Banach Spaces And Commuting Semigroups (102 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Quoc-Phong Vu This dissertation is concerned with several questions about the qualitative behavior of mild solutions of differential equations with multi-dimensional time on Banach spaces. For the differential equations ⎫ ∂u(s,t) ⎪ ∂s = Au(s, t)+f1(s, t) ⎬ ∗ ⎪ ( ) ∂u(s,t) ⎭⎪ ∂t = Bu(s, t)+f2(s, t) where A and B are linear (in general, unbounded) operators defined on a Banach space E, we give a definition of the mild solution of (∗). In order for Eq.(∗)tohave a (mild) solution, we introduce the condition(Ds − A)f2 =(Dt − B)f1 (where Ds and Dt are the partial differential operators with respect to s and t, respectively) which is understood in a generalized (mild) sense. We extend the notion of ad- missible subspaces, for closed translation-invariant subspaces M of BUC(R2,E) with respect to Eq.(∗), and we give characterization of the admissibility in terms M M of solvability of the operator equations AX − XDs = C and BX − XDt = CT . As a tool to investigate almost periodic functions of several variables which is important for the study of asymptotic behavior of Eq.(∗), we give answer to a question raised by Basit in 1971, which is an extension of the classical Bohl-Bohr theorem (to almost periodic functions with two or more variables). We also extend a theorem due to Loomis (who obtained it for functions with values in a finite dimensional space) to functions with values in Banach space E, under conditions introduced by Kadets. As an application, we obtain a result on the almost peri- odicity of a double integral of an almost periodic function defined on the plane. Applying to Eq.(∗), we show that the boundedness implies the almost periodicity for solutions of (∗) in the finite dimensional case. For the infinite dimensional case, and under the conditions that A and B are bounded linear operators, we reduce the question of the almost periodicity (resp, almost automorphicity) of the differential equations (∗) for given almost periodic (resp, almost automorphic) functions f1 and f2 to the question of the almost periodicity(resp, almost auto- morphicity) of the homogeneous system (i.e., f1 = f2 = 0). Finally, in chapter 6, we introduce the notion of C-admissible subspaces and obtain various conditions of C-admissibilities, generalizing well known results of Schuler-Vu and others. Approved: Quoc-Phong Vu Professor of Mathematics DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this work to: My parents, My grandmother, My brothers and sisters, My wife, and My kids. Acknowledgments In the Name of ALLAH[God], the Most Gracious and the Most Merciful. All praises and thanks are due to ALLAH, the Lord of all that exists. May the peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon Muhammad, the messenger of ALLAH, and his family and companions and all who follow them in righteousness until the day of judgment. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Prof. Quoc- Phong Vu, my advisor, for his guidance and his friendship. Also, I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee: Prof. A. Gulisashvili, Prof. H. Pasic and Prof. N. Pavel for taking their time to go through my manuscript . There is no doubt that none of this work would have been possible if it was not for the guidance of ALLAH and then for the love, patience and sacrifice of my beloved parents, grandmother and grandfather (who died while I am working on my dissertation) whose sacrifice and prayers have been a major source of strength for me all throughout my life. May ALLAH reward them with the best of reward and grant them mercy, success and happiness as long as they live and when they meet Him on the day of judgment. Also, special thanks go to each one of my brothers and my sisters whose spiritual support greatly enhanced my academic accomplishment. I am also greatly indebted to my beloved wife Um Omar for her patience and sacrifice. A special word of appreciation goes to my beloved kids. Moreover, I would like to thank all of my relatives and all of my friends. Also, I would like to thank King Abdul Aziz University for the scholarship and Ohio University for giving my the chance to continue my higher education. Last but not least, I thank those who help, encourage or pray for me during my stay in the United States. 7 Contents Abstract 3 Dedication 5 Acknowledgments 6 Introduction 9 1 Preliminaries 18 1.1 Almost periodic and almost automorphic functions from R2 into a Banachspace............................. 18 1.2 Thespectrumofvector-valuedfunctions.............. 22 1.3Semigroupsofoperators....................... 24 1.4 The operator equation AX − XB = C ............... 30 2 On mild solutions of differential equations 35 2.1 On mild solutions of differential equations with multi-time . 35 3 Regular admissibility of subspaces 50 3.1 Operator equations AX − XDs = C and BX − XDt = CT .... 50 3.2 Admissibility of difference equations . 56 4 On the integral of almost periodic functions 64 4.1OnBasit’squestion.......................... 64 4.2 Loomis’ theorem for vector-valued almost periodic functions . 69 8 4.3 An alternative form of the theorem on the integral of almost peri- odicfunctions ............................ 72 5 Almost periodic solutions of differential equations 74 5.1Thefinitedimensionalcase ..................... 74 5.2 The infinite dimensional case . 79 6 C-admissibility and analytic C-semigroups 87 6.1 C-admissibility . 87 6.2 C-semigroups and analytic C-semigroups.............. 90 6.3 Operator equation AX −XB = CD,withA generating an analytic C-semigroup.............................. 92 References 96 9 Introduction Consider the differential equation u(t)=Au(t)+f(t),t∈ R (1) where A is a linear operator on a Banach space E and f is a (continuous) function from R to E.IfA is a bounded operator, then the solution of (1) is defined by the following formula t u(t)=eA(t−s)u(s)+ eA(t−v)f(v)dv ∀t ≥ s (2) s where eA is defined by ∞ Ak eA = . (3) k=0 k! InthecasethatA is unbounded, but is generator of a C0-semigroup T (t), then (2) is replaced by t u(t)=T (t − s)u(s)+ T (t − v)f(v)dv ∀t ≥ s (4) s In general, the formula (4) is used as a definition of mild solution of equation (1). See for example: [5], [20] and [36] . The question of asymptotic behavior of (1) is intensively studied by many authors during the last decades, see e.g. [5], [16] and [54]. The primary objective of this dissertation is to initiate a systematic study of the questions of solvability and asymptotic behavior of differential equations with multi-dimensional time (or, for short, equations with multi-time). We are moti- vated by series of papers by Perov and others. See for examples: [37], [38], [39], 10 [40], [41] and [42] and the references therein. The theory of differential equations with multi-time has applications in different fields. We mention for example the multi-time Hamilton-Jacobi equations which arise from the study of problems in mathematical economics, see for example [7] and [31] and the references therein. The importance of the study of almost periodic solutions of differential equations rely on the applications in mathematical physics and astronomy (where are some objects has the almost periodic behavior). For sake of simplicity we restrict our- selves to the case of time dimension two, but we note that the results remain true for arbitrary finite time dimension. The first question we are concerned about in this dissertation is to find a general formula for mild solutions of the following differential equations ⎫ ∂u(s,t) ⎪ ∂s = Au(s, t)+f1(s, t) ⎬ ∗ ⎪ ( ) ∂u(s,t) ⎭⎪ ∂t = Bu(s, t)+f2(s, t) where A and B are commuting closed linear operators on a Banach space E. In chapter 2, we obtain the following formula for mild solutions of Eq. (∗): in order to be a mild solution of (∗)onR × R, u(s, t) must satisfy simultaneously t u(s, t)=T1(s − s0) T2(t − t0) u(s0,t0)+ T1(s − s0) T2(t − w) f2(s0,w) dw t0 s + T1(s − v) f1(v,t) dv (s ≥ s0,t≥ t0) s0 and s u(s, t)=T1(s − s0) T2(t − t0) u(s0,t0)+ T1(s − v) T2(t − t0) f1(v,t0) dv s0 11 t + T2(t − w) f2(s, w) dw (s ≥ s0,t≥ t0) t0 Note that mild solutions of ( ∗ )onR+ × R+ are given by t u(s, t)=T1(s) T2(t) u(0, 0) + T1(s) T2(t − w) f2(0,w) dw 0 s + T1(s − v) f1(v,t) dv (s ≥ 0,t≥ 0) 0 which must simultaneously satisfy s u(s, t)=T1(s) T2(t) u(0, 0) + T1(s − v) T2(t) f1(v,0) dv 0 t + T2(t − w) f2(s, w) dw (s ≥ 0,t≥ 0) 0 We show that in order to the system (∗) to have a solution, the following condition must be satisfied: (Ds − A)f2 =(Dt − B)f1 where Ds and Dt are the partial differentiations with respect to s and t, respectively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functional Analysis Lecture Notes Chapter 2. Operators on Hilbert Spaces
    FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES CHAPTER 2. OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Elementary Properties and Examples First recall the basic definitions regarding operators. Definition 1.1 (Continuous and Bounded Operators). Let X, Y be normed linear spaces, and let L: X Y be a linear operator. ! (a) L is continuous at a point f X if f f in X implies Lf Lf in Y . 2 n ! n ! (b) L is continuous if it is continuous at every point, i.e., if fn f in X implies Lfn Lf in Y for every f. ! ! (c) L is bounded if there exists a finite K 0 such that ≥ f X; Lf K f : 8 2 k k ≤ k k Note that Lf is the norm of Lf in Y , while f is the norm of f in X. k k k k (d) The operator norm of L is L = sup Lf : k k kfk=1 k k (e) We let (X; Y ) denote the set of all bounded linear operators mapping X into Y , i.e., B (X; Y ) = L: X Y : L is bounded and linear : B f ! g If X = Y = X then we write (X) = (X; X). B B (f) If Y = F then we say that L is a functional. The set of all bounded linear functionals on X is the dual space of X, and is denoted X0 = (X; F) = L: X F : L is bounded and linear : B f ! g We saw in Chapter 1 that, for a linear operator, boundedness and continuity are equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Operators and Adjoints
    Chapter 6 Linear operators and adjoints Contents Introduction .......................................... ............. 6.1 Fundamentals ......................................... ............. 6.2 Spaces of bounded linear operators . ................... 6.3 Inverseoperators.................................... ................. 6.5 Linearityofinverses.................................... ............... 6.5 Banachinversetheorem ................................. ................ 6.5 Equivalenceofspaces ................................. ................. 6.5 Isomorphicspaces.................................... ................ 6.6 Isometricspaces...................................... ............... 6.6 Unitaryequivalence .................................... ............... 6.7 Adjoints in Hilbert spaces . .............. 6.11 Unitaryoperators ...................................... .............. 6.13 Relations between the four spaces . ................. 6.14 Duality relations for convex cones . ................. 6.15 Geometric interpretation of adjoints . ............... 6.15 Optimization in Hilbert spaces . .............. 6.16 Thenormalequations ................................... ............... 6.16 Thedualproblem ...................................... .............. 6.17 Pseudo-inverseoperators . .................. 6.18 AnalysisoftheDTFT ..................................... ............. 6.21 6.1 Introduction The field of optimization uses linear operators and their adjoints extensively. Example. differentiation, convolution, Fourier transform,
    [Show full text]
  • 18.102 Introduction to Functional Analysis Spring 2009
    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.102 Introduction to Functional Analysis Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 108 LECTURE NOTES FOR 18.102, SPRING 2009 Lecture 19. Thursday, April 16 I am heading towards the spectral theory of self-adjoint compact operators. This is rather similar to the spectral theory of self-adjoint matrices and has many useful applications. There is a very effective spectral theory of general bounded but self- adjoint operators but I do not expect to have time to do this. There is also a pretty satisfactory spectral theory of non-selfadjoint compact operators, which it is more likely I will get to. There is no satisfactory spectral theory for general non-compact and non-self-adjoint operators as you can easily see from examples (such as the shift operator). In some sense compact operators are ‘small’ and rather like finite rank operators. If you accept this, then you will want to say that an operator such as (19.1) Id −K; K 2 K(H) is ‘big’. We are quite interested in this operator because of spectral theory. To say that λ 2 C is an eigenvalue of K is to say that there is a non-trivial solution of (19.2) Ku − λu = 0 where non-trivial means other than than the solution u = 0 which always exists. If λ =6 0 we can divide by λ and we are looking for solutions of −1 (19.3) (Id −λ K)u = 0 −1 which is just (19.1) for another compact operator, namely λ K: What are properties of Id −K which migh show it to be ‘big? Here are three: Proposition 26.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Toeplitz Operators
    2008.10.07.08 5 Toeplitz Operators There are two signal spaces which will be important for us. • Semi-infinite signals: Functions x ∈ ℓ2(Z+, R). They have a Fourier transform g = F x, where g ∈ H2; that is, g : D → C is analytic on the open unit disk, so it has no poles there. • Bi-infinite signals: Functions x ∈ ℓ2(Z, R). They have a Fourier transform g = F x, where g ∈ L2(T). Then g : T → C, and g may have poles both inside and outside the disk. 5.1 Causality and Time-invariance Suppose G is a bounded linear map G : ℓ2(Z) → ℓ2(Z) given by yi = Gijuj j∈Z X where Gij are the coefficients in its matrix representation. The map G is called time- invariant or shift-invariant if it is Toeplitz , which means Gi−1,j = Gi,j+1 that is G is constant along diagonals from top-left to bottom right. Such matrices are convolution operators, because they have the form ... a0 a−1 a−2 a1 a0 a−1 a−2 G = a2 a1 a0 a−1 a2 a1 a0 ... Here the box indicates the 0, 0 element, since the matrix is indexed from −∞ to ∞. With this matrix, we have y = Gu if and only if yi = ai−juj k∈Z X We say G is causal if the matrix G is lower triangular. For example, the matrix ... a0 a1 a0 G = a2 a1 a0 a3 a2 a1 a0 ... 1 5 Toeplitz Operators 2008.10.07.08 is both causal and time-invariant.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on Riesz Spaces with Property-$ B$
    Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal Ş. Alpay; B. Altin; C. Tonyali A note on Riesz spaces with property-b Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, Vol. 56 (2006), No. 2, 765–772 Persistent URL: http://dml.cz/dmlcz/128103 Terms of use: © Institute of Mathematics AS CR, 2006 Institute of Mathematics of the Czech Academy of Sciences provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use. This document has been digitized, optimized for electronic delivery and stamped with digital signature within the project DML-CZ: The Czech Digital Mathematics Library http://dml.cz Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 56 (131) (2006), 765–772 A NOTE ON RIESZ SPACES WITH PROPERTY-b S¸. Alpay, B. Altin and C. Tonyali, Ankara (Received February 6, 2004) Abstract. We study an order boundedness property in Riesz spaces and investigate Riesz spaces and Banach lattices enjoying this property. Keywords: Riesz spaces, Banach lattices, b-property MSC 2000 : 46B42, 46B28 1. Introduction and preliminaries All Riesz spaces considered in this note have separating order duals. Therefore we will not distinguish between a Riesz space E and its image in the order bidual E∼∼. In all undefined terminology concerning Riesz spaces we will adhere to [3]. The notions of a Riesz space with property-b and b-order boundedness of operators between Riesz spaces were introduced in [1]. Definition. Let E be a Riesz space. A set A E is called b-order bounded in ⊂ E if it is order bounded in E∼∼. A Riesz space E is said to have property-b if each subset A E which is order bounded in E∼∼ remains order bounded in E.
    [Show full text]
  • L∞ , Let T : L ∞ → L∞ Be Defined by Tx = ( X(1), X(2) 2 , X(3) 3 ,... ) Pr
    ASSIGNMENT II MTL 411 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS 1. For x = (x(1); x(2);::: ) 2 l1, let T : l1 ! l1 be defined by ( ) x(2) x(3) T x = x(1); ; ;::: 2 3 Prove that (i) T is a bounded linear operator (ii) T is injective (iii) Range of T is not a closed subspace of l1. 2. If T : X ! Y is a linear operator such that there exists c > 0 and 0 =6 x0 2 X satisfying kT xk ≤ ckxk 8 x 2 X; kT x0k = ckx0k; then show that T 2 B(X; Y ) and kT k = c. 3. For x = (x(1); x(2);::: ) 2 l2, consider the right shift operator S : l2 ! l2 defined by Sx = (0; x(1); x(2);::: ) and the left shift operator T : l2 ! l2 defined by T x = (x(2); x(3);::: ) Prove that (i) S is a abounded linear operator and kSk = 1. (ii) S is injective. (iii) S is, in fact, an isometry. (iv) S is not surjective. (v) T is a bounded linear operator and kT k = 1 (vi) T is not injective. (vii) T is not an isometry. (viii) T is surjective. (ix) TS = I and ST =6 I. That is, neither S nor T is invertible, however, S has a left inverse and T has a right inverse. Note that item (ix) illustrates the fact that the Banach algebra B(X) is not in general commutative. 4. Show with an example that for T 2 B(X; Y ) and S 2 B(Y; Z), the equality in the submulti- plicativity of the norms kS ◦ T k ≤ kSkkT k may not hold.
    [Show full text]
  • Operators, Functions, and Systems: an Easy Reading
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/092 Selected Titles in This Series 92 Nikolai K. Nikolski, Operators, functions, and systems: An easy reading. Volume 1: Hardy, Hankel, and Toeplitz, 2002 91 Richard Montgomery, A tour of subriemannian geometries, their geodesies and applications, 2002 90 Christian Gerard and Izabella Laba, Multiparticle quantum scattering in constant magnetic fields, 2002 89 Michel Ledoux, The concentration of measure phenomenon, 2001 88 Edward Frenkel and David Ben-Zvi, Vertex algebras and algebraic curves, 2001 87 Bruno Poizat, Stable groups, 2001 86 Stanley N. Burris, Number theoretic density and logical limit laws, 2001 85 V. A. Kozlov, V. G. Maz'ya, and J. Rossmann, Spectral problems associated with corner singularities of solutions to elliptic equations, 2001 84 Laszlo Fuchs and Luigi Salce, Modules over non-Noetherian domains, 2001 83 Sigurdur Helgason, Groups and geometric analysis: Integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions, 2000 82 Goro Shimura, Arithmeticity in the theory of automorphic forms, 2000 81 Michael E. Taylor, Tools for PDE: Pseudodifferential operators, paradifferential operators, and layer potentials, 2000 80 Lindsay N. Childs, Taming wild extensions: Hopf algebras and local Galois module theory, 2000 79 Joseph A. Cima and William T. Ross, The backward shift on the Hardy space, 2000 78 Boris A. Kupershmidt, KP or mKP: Noncommutative mathematics of Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, and integrable systems, 2000 77 Fumio Hiai and Denes Petz, The semicircle law, free random variables and entropy, 2000 76 Frederick P. Gardiner and Nikola Lakic, Quasiconformal Teichmiiller theory, 2000 75 Greg Hjorth, Classification and orbit equivalence relations, 2000 74 Daniel W.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic and Almost Periodic Time Scales
    Nonauton. Dyn. Syst. 2016; 3:24–41 Research Article Open Access Chao Wang, Ravi P. Agarwal, and Donal O’Regan Periodicity, almost periodicity for time scales and related functions DOI 10.1515/msds-2016-0003 Received December 9, 2015; accepted May 4, 2016 Abstract: In this paper, we study almost periodic and changing-periodic time scales considered by Wang and Agarwal in 2015. Some improvements of almost periodic time scales are made. Furthermore, we introduce a new concept of periodic time scales in which the invariance for a time scale is dependent on an translation direction. Also some new results on periodic and changing-periodic time scales are presented. Keywords: Time scales, Almost periodic time scales, Changing periodic time scales MSC: 26E70, 43A60, 34N05. 1 Introduction Recently, many papers were devoted to almost periodic issues on time scales (see for examples [1–5]). In 2014, to study the approximation property of time scales, Wang and Agarwal introduced some new concepts of almost periodic time scales in [6] and the results show that this type of time scales can not only unify the continuous and discrete situations but can also strictly include the concept of periodic time scales. In 2015, some open problems related to this topic were proposed by the authors (see [4]). Wang and Agarwal addressed the concept of changing-periodic time scales in 2015. This type of time scales can contribute to decomposing an arbitrary time scales with bounded graininess function µ into a countable union of periodic time scales i.e, Decomposition Theorem of Time Scales. The concept of periodic time scales which appeared in [7, 8] can be quite limited for the simple reason that it requires inf T = −∞ and sup T = +∞.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Analysis (WS 19/20), Problem Set 8 (Spectrum And
    Functional Analysis (WS 19/20), Problem Set 8 (spectrum and adjoints on Hilbert spaces)1 In what follows, let H be a complex Hilbert space. Let T : H ! H be a bounded linear operator. We write T ∗ : H ! H for adjoint of T dened with hT x; yi = hx; T ∗yi: This operator exists and is uniquely determined by Riesz Representation Theorem. Spectrum of T is the set σ(T ) = fλ 2 C : T − λI does not have a bounded inverseg. Resolvent of T is the set ρ(T ) = C n σ(T ). Basic facts on adjoint operators R1. | Adjoint T ∗ exists and is uniquely determined. R2. | Adjoint T ∗ is a bounded linear operator and kT ∗k = kT k. Moreover, kT ∗T k = kT k2. R3. | Taking adjoints is an involution: (T ∗)∗ = T . R4. Adjoints commute with the sum: ∗ ∗ ∗. | (T1 + T2) = T1 + T2 ∗ ∗ R5. | For λ 2 C we have (λT ) = λ T . R6. | Let T be a bounded invertible operator. Then, (T ∗)−1 = (T −1)∗. R7. Let be bounded operators. Then, ∗ ∗ ∗. | T1;T2 (T1 T2) = T2 T1 R8. | We have relationship between kernel and image of T and T ∗: ker T ∗ = (im T )?; (ker T ∗)? = im T It will be helpful to prove that if M ⊂ H is a linear subspace, then M = M ??. Btw, this covers all previous results like if N is a nite dimensional linear subspace then N = N ?? (because N is closed). Computation of adjoints n n ∗ M1. ,Let A : R ! R be a complex matrix. Find A . 2 M2. | ,Let H = l (Z). For x = (:::; x−2; x−1; x0; x1; x2; :::) 2 H we dene the right shift operator −1 ∗ with (Rx)k = xk−1: Find kRk, R and R .
    [Show full text]
  • Baire Category Theorem and Its Consequences
    Functional Analysis, BSM, Spring 2012 Exercise sheet: Baire category theorem and its consequences S1 Baire category theorem. If (X; d) is a complete metric space and X = n=1 Fn for some closed sets Fn, then for at least one n the set Fn contains a ball, that is, 9x 2 X; r > 0 : Br(x) ⊂ Fn. Principle of uniform boundedness (Banach-Steinhaus). Let (X; k · kX ) be a Banach space, (Y; k · kY ) a normed space and Tn : X ! Y a bounded operator for each n 2 N. Suppose that for any x 2 X there exists Cx > 0 such that kTnxkY ≤ Cx for all n. Then there exists C > 0 such that kTnk ≤ C for all n. Inverse mapping theorem. Let X; Y be Banach spaces and T : X ! Y a bounded operator. Suppose that T is injective (ker T = f0g) and surjective (ran T = Y ). Then the inverse operator T −1 : Y ! X is necessarily bounded. 1. Consider the set Q of rational numbers with the metric d(x; y) = jx − yj; x; y 2 Q. Show that the Baire category theorem does not hold in this metric space. 2. Let (X; d) be a complete metric space. Suppose that Gn ⊂ X is a dense open set for n 2 N. Show that T1 n=1 Gn is non-empty. Find a non-complete metric space in which this is not true. T1 In fact, we can say more: n=1 Gn is dense. Prove this using the fact that a closed subset of a complete metric space is also complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Bounded Operator - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Bounded operator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounded_operator Bounded operator From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In functional analysis, a branch of mathematics, a bounded linear operator is a linear transformation L between normed vector spaces X and Y for which the ratio of the norm of L(v) to that of v is bounded by the same number, over all non-zero vectors v in X. In other words, there exists some M > 0 such that for all v in X The smallest such M is called the operator norm of L. A bounded linear operator is generally not a bounded function; the latter would require that the norm of L(v) be bounded for all v, which is not possible unless Y is the zero vector space. Rather, a bounded linear operator is a locally bounded function. A linear operator on a metrizable vector space is bounded if and only if it is continuous. Contents 1 Examples 2 Equivalence of boundedness and continuity 3 Linearity and boundedness 4 Further properties 5 Properties of the space of bounded linear operators 6 Topological vector spaces 7 See also 8 References Examples Any linear operator between two finite-dimensional normed spaces is bounded, and such an operator may be viewed as multiplication by some fixed matrix. Many integral transforms are bounded linear operators. For instance, if is a continuous function, then the operator defined on the space of continuous functions on endowed with the uniform norm and with values in the space with given by the formula is bounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Analysis
    Functional Analysis Lecture Notes of Winter Semester 2017/18 These lecture notes are based on my course from winter semester 2017/18. I kept the results discussed in the lectures (except for minor corrections and improvements) and most of their numbering. Typi- cally, the proofs and calculations in the notes are a bit shorter than those given in class. The drawings and many additional oral remarks from the lectures are omitted here. On the other hand, the notes con- tain a couple of proofs (mostly for peripheral statements) and very few results not presented during the course. With `Analysis 1{4' I refer to the class notes of my lectures from 2015{17 which can be found on my webpage. Occasionally, I use concepts, notation and standard results of these courses without further notice. I am happy to thank Bernhard Konrad, J¨orgB¨auerle and Johannes Eilinghoff for their careful proof reading of my lecture notes from 2009 and 2011. Karlsruhe, May 25, 2020 Roland Schnaubelt Contents Chapter 1. Banach spaces2 1.1. Basic properties of Banach and metric spaces2 1.2. More examples of Banach spaces 20 1.3. Compactness and separability 28 Chapter 2. Continuous linear operators 38 2.1. Basic properties and examples of linear operators 38 2.2. Standard constructions 47 2.3. The interpolation theorem of Riesz and Thorin 54 Chapter 3. Hilbert spaces 59 3.1. Basic properties and orthogonality 59 3.2. Orthonormal bases 64 Chapter 4. Two main theorems on bounded linear operators 69 4.1. The principle of uniform boundedness and strong convergence 69 4.2.
    [Show full text]