DOCSLIB.ORG

{Download PDF} Who Was Marie Antoinette? Kindle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{Download PDF} Who Was Marie Antoinette? Kindle WHO WAS MARIE ANTOINETTE? PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Dana Meachen Rau | 112 pages | 15 Oct 2015 | Grosset and Dunlap | 9780448483108 | English | New York, United States Who Was Marie Antoinette? PDF Book The couple would not consummate their marriage until seven years later — this became a popular matter of discussion and ridicule both at court and among the public. Full name Maria Antonia Josefa Johanna. Throughout her imprisonment and up to her execution, Marie Antoinette could count on the sympathy of conservative factions and social-religious groups which had turned against the Revolution, and also on wealthy individuals ready to bribe republican officials to facilitate her escape; [] These plots all failed. Unlike during her years as queen, Marie Antoinette captivated the French public in her early years in the country. Fersen became a trusted adviser to the Swedish king. In May the queen reached out to the comte de Mirabeau , a prominent member of the National Assembly who hoped to restore the authority of the crown. Retrieved 16 December There is no evidence to support the accusations. At least once she received a visit by a Catholic priest. They were 15 and 16 years old, and they had never met. Many historians conclude that Louis suffered from phimosis, a physiological handicap that makes sex painful, and that he eventually had surgery to correct the problem. Marie still manages however to write letters and smuggle them out, appealing to Europe's rulers to crush the revolution by force. The prestige of the French monarchy had never been at such a low level. A working farm completed what Zweig satirized as "this expensive pastoral comedy," though tales of the queen herself herding sheep are false, Baulez insists. Four years later, Marie Antoinette and the dauphin were married by proxy in Vienna. When the queen implored Madame Richard for a fresh supply of clothing, the orders from the revolutionary government were so stern and strict that the apprehensive warden did not dare grant her wishes. The initial reaction to the marriage between Marie Antoinette and Louis-Auguste was mixed. Tarred by pamphleteers for sexual wantonness, she was actually rather prudish, at least according to her brother, Austrian emperor Joseph II. Robespierre: man of terror. It's the 18th century at the Court of Versailles, the residence of the last queen of France, Marie Antoinette, a figure who is still controversial today. Maximilien de Robespierre was an official during the French Revolution and one of the principal architects of the Reign of Terror. In June , the year-old boy, a king—Louis XVII to Royalists—without a country, died in the Temple tower, most likely of the same tuberculosis that had felled his elder brother. House of Habsburg-Lorraine. Marie Antoinette would likely have been perfectly happy to have played only a ceremonial part as queen. Marie Antoinette was prevented from seeing it, but fainted upon learning of it. Early on 16 October, Marie Antoinette was declared guilty of the three main charges against her: depletion of the national treasury, conspiracy against the internal and external security of the State, and high treason because of her intelligence activities in the interest of the enemy; the latter charge alone was enough to condemn her to death. To escape palace life, Marie Antoinette built a hideaway for herself and her intimate friends that included cottages equipped with couches, stoves, and billiard tables. Marie Antoinette's actions in refusing to collaborate with the Girondins , in power between April and June , led them to denounce the treason of the Austrian comity, a direct allusion to the queen. The tutor found Marie Antoinette "more intelligent than has been generally supposed," but added that since "she is rather lazy and extremely frivolous, she is hard to teach. In a sermon at the town's Church of Saint Louis, the Bishop of Nancy railed against the queen's profligate spending. Rousseau ascribes these words to a "great princess", but the purported writing date precedes Marie Antoinette's arrival in France. But times had changed. Denise Folliot. Human Behavior. Maria Theresa of Austria. Marie Antoinette. The basis of their secret understanding with the queen was that, after the constitution had been revised so as to bolster the executive power of the king, it should be loyally accepted and implemented by Louis XVI. Her head was affixed on a pike and paraded through the city to the Temple for the queen to see. Louis XVI was executed by guillotine on 21 January Who Was Marie Antoinette? Writer She directed architect Richard Mique and artist Hubert Robert to conjure up a sylvan fantasy of artificial streams, grottoes and winding paths. On 21 September , the monarchy was abolished. The brick-tiled floor was covered with muddy slime and water trickled down the walls due to the proximity to the Seine. She had the tastes of an actress, not an austerely regal queen. After Madame Roland sent a letter to the king denouncing the queen's role in these matters, urged by the queen, Louis XVI disbanded [ citation needed ] the government, thus losing his majority in the Assembly. He also wanted to be a minister and was not immune to corruption. Marie Antoinette was born an Austrian princess. A fortune hunter named Jeanne de Lamotte Valois persuaded the gullible Cardinal de Rohan that she was a close friend of the queen's—though Marie Antoinette had never heard of her. In , the queen played a decisive role in the nomination of Charles Alexandre de Calonne , a close friend of the Polignacs, as Controller-General of Finances , and of the baron de Breteuil as the Minister of the Royal Household , making him perhaps the strongest and most conservative minister of the reign. The purchase of Saint-Cloud thus damaged the public's image of the queen even further. Four guards accompanied the queen wherever she went, and her bedroom door had to be left open at night. But it was not to be. Their enmity continuing, Marie Antoinette played a decisive role in defeating him in his aims to become the mayor of Paris in November Louis XVI was executed by guillotine on 21 January King Louis XV died on 10 May after contracting smallpox. Demonstrating little interest in the ceremonial conventions of courtly life, she occupies her time with balls, fashion matters and imaginative hairstyles. Mary Chestnut. Monarchy abolished. Cloistered in the luxury of Versailles, the royal couple was oblivious to their subjects' plight. Irvine, Scotland: Isaac MacDonald. The couple would not consummate their marriage until seven years later — this became a popular matter of discussion and ridicule both at court and among the public. Marie Antoinette was prevented from seeing it, but fainted upon learning of it. Amidst the atmosphere of a wave of libelles , the Holy Roman Emperor Joseph II came to France incognito, using the name Comte de Falkenstein, for a six-week visit during which he toured Paris extensively and was a guest at Versailles. After a hour marathon trial, she is unanimously declared guilty on all counts. Marie-Antoinette was not, at that time, interested in politics except as a way of securing favours for her friends, and her political influence never exceeded that formerly wielded by the royal mistresses of Louis XV. But Louis' weakness forced her to take a more dominant role—for which the French people could not forgive her. Many French people were beginning to blame her for the degrading economic situation, suggesting the country's inability to pay off its debt was the result of her wasting the crown's money. Who Was Marie Antoinette? Reviews When Madame Richard handed him a bowl of soup, he stabbed her in the heart with a knife. Like Lafayette, Mirabeau was a liberal aristocrat. The princess de Lamballe, who remained loyal to the queen throughout the Revolution, was imprisoned along with her. Marie Antoinette was instrumental in the reinstatement of Jacques Necker as Finance Minister on 26 August, a popular move, even though she herself was worried that it would go against her if Necker proved unsuccessful in reforming the country's finances. Few women in history have inspired as many myths as Marie-Antoinette, the last queen of France, typically portrayed as the embodiment of excess and debauchery. Marie still manages however to write letters and smuggle them out, appealing to Europe's rulers to crush the revolution by force. She was Louis XV's mistress and had considerable political influence over him. But times had changed. Septembre Instead, emissaries dispatched by the Assembly arrived with orders to return the family to Paris. But "her character, her heart, are excellent," he reported. Video Ingenuity Awards. Earth Optimism Summit. In October of the same year Marie Antoinette is brought before the court. When Mirabeau died in April without securing the Assembly's promise to retain Louis as king in a constitutional monarchy, Louis and Marie Antoinette put their plan into action. Retrieved 1 September She was brought before the Revolutionary tribunal on October 14, , and was guillotined two days later. Anna Maria Luisa, Electress Palatine. Translated by Julie Rose. In , the queen was busy with the creation of her " hamlet ", a rustic retreat built by her favored architect, Richard Mique , according to the designs of the painter Hubert Robert. Louis Auguste de Bourbon and Marie Antoinette were married on May 16, , in the royal chapel at the palace of Versailles. Thomas, Chantal The young queen invited him to several balls at Versailles, but not long after, he left for England. Rougeville did return on Friday to escort the queen to safety, but a guard who had been bribed stopped the queen at the last minute from leaving the premises, for reasons unknown.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHRISTOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE of the Venerable M. María Antonia
    CHRISTOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE Of The Venerable M. María Antonia Paris and Saint Anthony Maria Claret Founders of the Religious of Mary Immaculate Claretian Sisters A BRIEF PRESENTATION OF THE ORIGINAL PAPER Paper submitted by Sister Margarita Gomez, rmi. US Independent Delegation West Palm Beach, Fl. January 5, 2010 1 This paper is a summary presentation of the paper introducing the Christological experience of our founders, the Venerable M. Maria Antonia Paris, and Saint Anthony Maria Claret. This paper was presented at the workshop held in Barcelona on December 28, 2009 till January 6, 2010. It is very important to have from the very beginning an attitude of wonder and reverence in order to be able to have a glimpse into the intimate relationship between Christ and our Founders. We are entering a sacred space, the in depth relationship held between Christ and Mother Maria Antonia and Fr. Claret. Let us allow ourselves to be amazed by the intimacy they had with Christ and how this intimate relationship was an ongoing reality until the time the Lord called them home. I also would like to underline that our Founders did not write any Christological treatise, yet in their autobiographies they opened their hearts letting us know how their lives were centered in Christ, they did it in a very candid way, with honesty and in truth. They lived in Christ to such an extent that they truly could say with Saint Paul: It is not I who lives, it is Christ who lives in me. (Gal. 2:20) The first part of this paper deals with the vocation of Mother Maria Antonia y Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Trial July 21, 2021 at 600Pm
    Page 1 of 15 RPT008 6/28/2021 11:46:58 Wednesday Jul 21, 2021 HUP152397-3832-0 ABRO,SANA U DDIN BACKING - UNSAFE / ILLEGAL Apr 7, 2021 William J Citizen Jr 18:00 WEIKEL,D 101.00 134.00 0 $235.00 $0.00 0.00 $235.00 HUP109135-3049-0 AGUAS,MARIA ANTONIA FAIL TO MAINTAIN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Jun 16, 2017 Rene S Gonzalez 18:00 Porter, Will 221.00 217.10 0 $438.10 $0.00 0.00 $438.10 HUP109135-3103-0 AGUAS,MARIA ANTONIA DL - NO DRIVERS LICENSE Jun 16, 2017 Rene S Gonzalez 18:00 Porter, Will 156.00 197.60 0 $353.60 $0.00 0.00 $353.60 HUP152488-3001-0 ARGUETA,JOEL BLADIMIR SPEEDING Apr 11, 2021 Paul Anthony Kubosh 18:00 MANYK, MITCHELL 188.00 134.00 0 $322.00 $0.00 0.00 $322.00 HUP152784-3001-0 BELLO,EMIL JOSE SPEEDING Apr 22, 2021 Paul Anthony Kubosh 18:00 GUIDRY, KENT 103.00 134.00 0 $237.00 $0.00 0.00 $237.00 HUP151654-3006-0 BLANCOSORTO,ELI VLADIMIR RAN STOP SIGN Mar 13, 2021 Rene S Gonzalez 18:00 GUIDRY, KENT 83.00 134.00 0 $217.00 $0.00 0.00 $217.00 Page 2 of 15 RPT008 6/28/2021 11:46:58 Wednesday Jul 21, 2021 CC 148070-2012-0 BURRELL,TODD DURAN FAILURE TO APPEAR Apr 13, 2021 Paul Anthony Kubosh 18:00 Salinas, Laura 500.00 76.00 0 $576.00 $0.00 0.00 $576.00 HUP148070-3001-0 BURRELL,TODD DURAN SPEEDING Nov 2, 2020 Paul Anthony Kubosh 18:00 ROSE, TIMOTHY 88.00 134.00 0 $222.00 $0.00 0.00 $222.00 HUP151758-3006-0 CAMPOS-SOSA,STEVEN VALMORE RAN STOP SIGN Mar 17, 2021 Paul Anthony Kubosh 18:00 Thomas Meek 83.00 134.00 0 $217.00 $0.00 0.00 $217.00 HUP150273-3049-0 CARDONA,DAVID ALEXANDER FAIL TO MAINTAIN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Jan 22, 2021
    [Show full text]
  • European Art & Old Masters (1577) Lot 68
    European Art & Old Masters (1577) June 12, 2017 EDT, Main Floor Gallery Lot 68 Estimate: $50000 - $70000 (plus Buyer's Premium) HUBERT ROBERT (FRENCH 1733-1808) PAYSAGE AVEC UNE STATUE ÉQUESTRE Signed with initials 'H.R.' and dated '1780' on stone tablet at bottom center left, oil on canvas 22 x 35 in. (55.9 x 88.9cm) Provenance: Collection of Leon M. Lowenstein, Paris, France (1935). Galerie Jean Charpentier, Paris, sale of Collection of Leon M. Lowenstein, December 17, 1935, lot 76. Private Collection, Paris, France. Hôtel Drouot, Paris, sale of June 23, 24 and 25, 1921, lot 83. Palais Galliera, Paris, sale of March 31, 1966, lot 32. Palais Galliera, Paris, sale of March 28, 1968, lot 58. Property from the Daniel W. Dietrich II Foundation. LITERATURE: Galerie Jean Charpentier, In the Collection of Leon M. Lowenstein, exhibition catalogue, December 17, 1935, p. 32, no. 76 (illustrated). NOTE: Earning the nickname 'Robert des Ruines' ("Robert of Ruins"), Hubert Robert is considered amongst the most important painters of architectural ruins and capriccios (imaginary landscapes) in 18th century France. His paintings were particularly popular with French aristocracy, undoubtedly helped by his father Nicolas Robert being an upper-servant to the Marquis of Choiseul-Stainville. By the 1770s, Robert had received the appointment of Draftsman and Designer of the King's Gardens. He also designed gardens for the Marquis de Laborde and the Marquis de Girardin, and the philosopher Voltaire commissioned him to paint decorations for his theater at Ferney. Robert received a classical education at the Collège de Navarre in Paris, and later with the entourage of the Count of Stainville in Rome in 1754.
    [Show full text]
  • Fragonard, Jean Honoré Also Known As Fragonard, Jean-Honoré French, 1732 - 1806
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS French Paintings of the Fifteenth through Eighteenth Centuries Fragonard, Jean Honoré Also known as Fragonard, Jean-Honoré French, 1732 - 1806 BIOGRAPHY Fragonard was one of the most prolific of the eighteenth-century painters and draftsmen. Born in 1732 in Grasse in southern France, he moved with his family at an early age to Paris. He first took a position as a clerk, but having demonstrated an interest in art, he worked in the studio of the still life and genre painter Jean Siméon Chardin (French, 1699 - 1779). After spending a short time with Chardin, from whom he probably learned merely the bare rudiments of his craft, he entered the studio of François Boucher (French, 1703 - 1770). Under Boucher’s tutelage Fragonard’s talent developed rapidly, and he was soon painting decorative pictures and pastoral subjects very close to his master’s style (for example, Diana and Endymion). Although Fragonard apparently never took courses at the Académie royale de peinture et de sculpture, he entered the Prix de Rome competition in 1752, sponsored by Boucher, winning the coveted first prize on the strength of Jeroboam Sacrificing to the Idols (Paris, École des Beaux-Arts). Before leaving for Italy, however, he entered the École des élèves protégés in Paris, a school established to train the most promising students of the Académie royale. There he studied history and the classics and worked with the director, Carle Van Loo (French, 1705 - 1765), one of the leading painters of the day. Van Loo’s influence on Fragonard’s art is evident in the large Psyche Showing Her Sisters the Gifts She Has Received from Cupid (London, National Gallery), a fluidly painted work that was exhibited to King Louis XV (r.
    [Show full text]
  • France in Ruins: Paintings by Hubert Robert C.1786-1788
    FRANCE IN RUINS: PAINTINGS BY HUBERT ROBERT C.1786 – 1788 by LAUREN LOUISE DUDLEY A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Art History, Film and Visual Culture School of Languages, Culture, Art History and Music The University of Birmingham November 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis considers French artist Hubert Robert’s (1733-1808) paintings from 1786-1788, including his contributions to the 1787 Salon exhibition. This study examines the artist’s major commission for King Louis XVI, the Monuments de France series (1787), which depicts antique ruins in the south of France. The series is compared to Robert’s images of urban demolition projects in eighteenth-century Paris, which are discussed in relation to contemporary discourses relating to architecture, politics, history, hygiene, morality and social changes. The focus paintings of contemporary Paris include L’intérieur de l’Eglise des SS. Innocents, dans le commencement de sa destruction (c.1786-87), La démolition des maisons du Pont Notre-Dame (c.1786) and La démolition des maisons du Pont-au-Change (c.1788).
    [Show full text]
  • France in Ruins: Paintings by Hubert Robert C.1786-1788
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository FRANCE IN RUINS: PAINTINGS BY HUBERT ROBERT C.1786 – 1788 by LAUREN LOUISE DUDLEY A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Art History, Film and Visual Culture School of Languages, Culture, Art History and Music The University of Birmingham November 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis considers French artist Hubert Robert’s (1733-1808) paintings from 1786-1788, including his contributions to the 1787 Salon exhibition. This study examines the artist’s major commission for King Louis XVI, the Monuments de France series (1787), which depicts antique ruins in the south of France. The series is compared to Robert’s images of urban demolition projects in eighteenth-century Paris, which are discussed in relation to contemporary discourses relating to architecture, politics, history, hygiene, morality and social changes. The focus paintings of contemporary Paris include L’intérieur de l’Eglise des SS.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regeneration in Eighteenth Century French Art
    RUIN IMAGERY AND THE ICONOGRAPHY OF REGENERATION IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY FRENCH ART by Stephen Henry Whitney "" Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 1977 APPROVAL SHEET Title of Thesis: Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regeneration in Eighteenth Century French Art Name of Candidate: Stephen Whitney Master of Arts, 1977 Thesis and Abstract Approved: Boctor George Levitine Professor Department of Art Date Approved: ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: Ruin Imagery and the Iconography of Regen­ eration in Eighteenth Century French Art Stephen Henry Whitney, Master of Arts, 1977 Thesis directed by: Doctor George Levitine Professor, Art Department While the extraordinary popularity of ruin imagery in eighteenth century France is well known to art historians, it has remained a largely unstudied, and thus misunderstood, cultural phenomenon. The profusion of ruin pictures and ruinous garden pavilions during the Enlightenment is general- ly interpreted as symptomatic of the emotional febrility and escapist perversity of a society bogged down in decadence. The popularity of ruins as motifs of interior decoration is taken as proof of the reign of rococo frivolity. The present study seeks to bring into focus how eight- eenth century artists, connoisseurs and writers themselves felt about their ruin imagery. This examination is called for because the evidence of documents, literary sources and the art itself overwhelmingly suggests that ruins were consid- ered to be symbolic of nature's regenerative vitality and wholesomeness. To the contemporary viewer, therefore, the experience of a ruin was an antidote to, not a symptom of, social and personal lethargy.
    [Show full text]
  • 36 the Happy Family
    Notes 1. Georges Wildenstein wrote to Fern Rusk Shapley 36 that his father had purchased the paintings from the 1960.6.12 marquis des Isnards, whose unwritten family tradi- tion was that they had owned the pair since they The Happy Family were painted (letter of June 21, 1948, NGA curato- c. 1775 rial files). The CA“ ” numbers on the stretchers of both paintings, and the corresponding prospectus for the pair (in NGA curatorial files) indicate that oil on canvas, oval, 53.9 × 65.1 (21 1/4× 25 5/8) they were on consignment with M. Knoedler & Timken Collection Co. at some time during the Simpsons’ ownership. 2. “[D]es plus agréables,” Leroy de Senneville sale, Desmarest, Paris, April 5, 1780, no. 56; quoted in Distinguishing Marks and Labels Rosenberg 1989, 127 (Wildenstein 1960, 271). On stretcher: two NGA labels; label printed with “11517”; 3. See Rosenberg 1989, 103. label with penciled inscription “63 Fragonard”; double 4. Wildenstein 1960, 19. 5. See Cuzin 1987 – 1988, nos. 249 – 251; Rosenberg impression of an inked stamp with a “7” 1989, nos. 157 – 160. 6. Wildenstein 1960, 271. For the gouaches (Ananoff Technical Notes: The painting is secured to an eight-member oval 1961 – 1970, 2: nos. 1000, 1001), which belonged to stretcher with inset horizontal and vertical crossbars. The stretcher is the important collector marchal de Saincy (his sale, probably original to the painting. The primary support is a loosely Paris, April 29, 1789, and days following, lot 79), woven, medium-weight, plain-weave fabric. The painting has been see Grasse 1995, 32 – 33.
    [Show full text]
  • REPRESENTATIONS of MARIE- ANTOINETTE in 19Th
    L’AUGUSTE AUTRICHIENNE: REPRESENTATIONS OF MARIE- ANTOINETTE IN 19th CENTURY FRENCH LITERATURE AND HISTORY --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- by KALYN ROCHELLE BALDRIDGE Dr. Carol Lazzaro-Weis, Dissertation Superviser MAY 2016 APPROVAL PAGE The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled L’AUGUSTE AUTRICHIENNE: REPRESENTATIONS OF MARIE-ANTOINETTE IN 19th CENTURY FRENCH LITERATURE AND HISTORY presented by Kalyn Rochelle Baldridge, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Carol Lazzaro-Weis Professor Ilyana Karthas Professor Valerie Kaussen Professor Megan Moore Professor Daniel Sipe ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first of all like to acknowledge the Department of Romance Languages at the University of Missouri for having supported me throughout my dissertation writing process, allowing me to spend time in France, and welcoming me back to the campus for my final year of study. Secondly, I would like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Valerie Kaussen, Dr. Megan Moore and Dr. Daniel Sipe, for taking the time to read my research and offer their welcome suggestions and insight. I would especially like to thank Dr. Ilyana Karthas, from the Department of History, for having spent many hours reading earlier drafts of my chapters and providing me with valuable feedback which spurred me on to new discoveries. I am most grateful to my dissertation superviser, Dr. Carol Lazzaro-Weis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Annual Report a Note About the Cover Artist
    The Life Raft Group 2007 Annual Report A note about the cover artist: This picture is one of many stunning pieces of art from the collection of Rachel Gilbert. Rachel is a 21-year-old GIST patient from the United Kingdom. She has been living with GIST for almost seven years. She uses her art to channel beauty into the world to cope with her disease. © 2007 Life Raft Group The Life Raft Group Dear Friends, Since last year’s annual report much has happened. The Life Raft Group (LRG) continues to grow in size and complexity to match the needs of today’s GIST (Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor) patient. Our program priority areas remain the same: Research, Information and Support, Patient Outreach and Assistance and Advocacy. However, in 2007, we expanded our capacity through innovative technologies and approaches to reach the evolving GIST community. From a birds-eye view the Life Raft Group is a thriving young organization, its message reaching hundreds of thousands each year to help GIST patients and their loved ones in as many ways as possible. Here on the ground, the LRG is running a race against time, a relentless pursuit of survival. Faced with increasing cases of resistance to first-line treatment, the LRG continues its commitment to finding a cure through its work and funding the Resistance Research Project. GIST is a rare cancer, but the struggle of cancer survivors is not uncommon in our world today. We will continue, with the help of our supporters, medical professionals and volunteers, to ensure that no one has to face GIST alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel FB Morse's "Gallery of The
    A New Look Samuel F. B. Morse’s Gallery of the Louvre Natio Nal Gallery of art July 3, 2011 – July 8, 2012 The exhibition is made possible by the generous support of the Terra Foundation for American Art and is organized in partnership with the National Gallery of Art. Kw No N today primarily as the inventor of the telegraph, Samuel F. B. Morse fiG. 2 Hubert Robert, Project for the (1791 – 1872) began his career as a painter. Born in Charlestown, Massachusetts, he Transformation of the Grande Galerie of the attended Yale University, graduated in 1810, and moved to Boston. There he became Louvre, 1796, Musée du Louvre, Paris. Photo the private pupil and friend of the painter Washington Allston, who introduced him credit, Réunion des to a traditional program of study that encompassed drawing, anatomy, and art theory. Musées Nationaux / Art Resource, NY; photo, With Allston’s encouragement, Morse went to London, where he met Benjamin Jean-Gilles Berizzi West and was accepted as a student at the Royal Academy of Arts. Morse’s first major painting there, The Dying Hercules (1812 – 1813, Yale University Art Gallery), earned high praise. Returning home in 1815, full of optimism and national pride, Morse confronted an artistic climate unfavorably disposed to history painting in the grand manner and was forced to turn to portrait painting for financial support. Throughout the late 1810s and 1820s, he painted portraits of clients in cities and towns along the Atlantic seaboard. His practice as a portraitist and his ambitions to advance a strong national art came together in his first great picture,The House of Representatives (fi G.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Rediscovered Paintings by Hubert Robert and Their French
    .VENUS (;AVIN IIAMII.'I()N'S PI{IiSENTIN(i IIEI,EN Io I'ARIS 'small' :lnnounced that he had already beg;un some paintings. Wc know of at leasttwo snrall paintings of rhe samesubject and composifion as the large painting in the Louvre. One of these, on canvas and measuring jo by 62 cm., appeared in a sale at Chriscie's, New York, on r8th May 1994.8 and has a similar formet to Hamilton's other known modelli. Another painring (-1oby 38 cm.) was sold in Portland in eoo5o,rand is currently rn a private collection in New York (Fig.r9). It is probable that ir\ 1777 Harnilton produced his usual modelli for Lord Shelbumet.' including; one or orher of these small paintings. It rvould follow that tor the Paris and Helen series, Hamilton would have wanted to start with the encounter of the two lovers that he had already painted for Kedleston Hall. Yet he failed to win the commission from Lord Shelburne. Did he paint the large Louvre painting in the hope of attracting rnother potenfial purchaser? In r78r Prince Marcantonio Borghese(r73o-t8oo) offered Hamilton the chance to desigr the entire decorative scherne tbr one of the finest rooms in the Villa Borghese.r, Hamilton zo. Padsand Helot byJacque-Louis David. r788-t19.Cmvs, r46 by r8l cm. revived the subject of Venuspresenting Helen to Pans, but the (Mus6c du Louvrc, Peris). .lirnensions of this venion are even larger than the painting now in the Louwe, its vertical axis probably dicteted by the height of r784-BJ (Mus6e du Louwe, Paris),dso remembered Harnilton's the room.
    [Show full text]