2011/2012 PFA Stadium Ratings Key: 1 = Unacceptable/Poor; 5 = Perfect/Excellent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2011/2012 PFA Stadium Ratings Key: 1 = Unacceptable/Poor; 5 = Perfect/Excellent 18/04/2012 2011/2012 PFA Stadium Ratings Key: 1 = Unacceptable/Poor; 5 = Perfect/Excellent Overall Rating Overall Rating 2011/2012 2010/2011 2009/2010 Hindmarsh (AUFC) 3.46 4.20 3.90 Suncorp Stadium (BR) 3.96 4.50 4.30 Bluetongue Stadium (CCM) 3.12 3.40 3.80 Skilled Stadium (GCU) 3.54 3.50 3.60 AAMI Park (MBH/MBV) 4.29 4.10 n/a Etihad Stadium (MBV) 4.20 4.00 2.70 Ausgrid Stadium (NUJ) 3.08 3.10 2.50 NIB Stadium (PG) 3.23 4.10 3.70 Sydney Football Stadium (SFC) 3.17 2.90 3.70 Westpac Stadium (WPX) 3.42 3.90 3.70 Average 3.55 3.77 3.54 PFA Pitch Rating System: Average Overall Rating 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 2011/12 1.50 1.00 2010/11 0.50 0.00 2009/10 Professional Footballers Australia Inc Tel. +61 (0) 3 9287 1888 833 Bourke Street Docklands VIC Australia 3008 Fax. +61 (0) 3 9287 1760 ARBN 083 328 581 • ABN 86 647 742 383 Web. www.pfa.net.au Registration No. A0027415N Email. [email protected] Page 2 Atmosphere Atmosphere Rating (Avg) 2011/2012 Adelaide United 3.46 Brisbane Roar 3.50 Central Coast Mariners 2.92 Gold Coast United 0.92 Melbourne Heart 3.65 Melbourne Victory 4.50 Newcastle Jets 3.42 Perth Glory 3.42 Sydney FC 3.46 Wellington Phoenix 2.79 PFA Stadium Rating 2011/12, Atmosphere 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 Ave 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 AUFC Roar CCM GCU MBH MBV NUJ Perth Sydney WPX Page 3 Pace Pace Rating (Avg) 2011/12 2010/11 Hindmarsh Stadium 3.11 3.9 Suncorp Stadium 4.04 4.5 Bluetongue Stadium 3.31 3.5 Skilled Stadium 3.58 3.6 AAMI Park 4.02 4.0 Etihad Stadium 4.00 4.0 Ausgrid Stadium 2.96 3.0 NIB Stadium 2.85 4.3 Sydney Football Stadium 3.63 2.8 Westpac Stadium 2.75 3.9 PFA Stadium Rating 2011/12, Pace 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 Ave 0.50 0.00 Page 4 Hardness Hardness Rating (Avg) 2011/12 2010/11 Hindmarsh Stadium 3.43 4.2 Suncorp Stadium 3.77 4.2 Bluetongue Stadium 2.77 3.6 Skilled Stadium 3.42 3.4 AAMI Park 3.71 4.0 Etihad Stadium 3.40 4.2 Ausgrid Stadium 3.00 3.0 NIB Stadium 3.12 4.2 Sydney Football Stadium 3.04 2.9 Westpac Stadium 3.42 3.8 PFA Stadium Rating 2011/12, Hardness 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 Ave 0.50 0.00 Page 5 Smoothness Smoothness Rating (Avg) 2011/12 2010/11 Hindmarsh Stadium 3.71 4.1 Suncorp Stadium 3.92 4.5 Bluetongue Stadium 2.73 3.5 Skilled Stadium 3.83 3.6 AAMI Park 4.43 4.2 Etihad Stadium 4.00 4.0 Ausgrid Stadium 2.88 3.1 NIB Stadium 3.35 4.3 Sydney Football Stadium 3.29 2.9 Westpac Stadium 3.83 4.1 PFA Stadium Rating 2011/12, Smoothness 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 Ave 0.50 0.00 .
Recommended publications
  • Sydney Football Stadium Redevelopment Community
    Sydney Football Stadium Redevelopment Community Consultative Committee (CCC) MEETING NOTES Meeting # 12, 21 October 2020, John Holland Offices on the SFS site, 6.30 pm PRESENT Margaret Harvie (MH - Chairperson) COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES Chelsea Ford (CF) Linda Gosling (LG) Tom Harley (TH) Sofie Mason-Jones (SMJ) Robert Postema (RP) Steve Rankin (SR) Vivienne Skinner (VS) LOCAL GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES Mayor Danny Said (Randwick City Council) SYDNEY FOOTBALL STADUM REPRESENTATIVES Peter Hynd, SFS Project Director, Infrastructure NSW (PH) PRESENTERS AND GUESTS Paul Cassel, Project Director, John Tiffany Jones, Communications Erica van den Honert, Acting Vlad Popovski, Senior Holland until 7.23 pm (PC) and Stakeholder Manager, John Executive Director, Infrastructure Communication Officer, Holland (TJ) until 7.23 pm Assessments, Department of Infrastructure NSW (VP) Planning, Industry & Environment (EVDH) APOLOGIES Mayor Paula Masselos (Waverly Cr Phillip Thallis (City of Sydney Kerrie Mather, CEO, Sydney Julie Osborne Council) Council) (PT) – PT attended the Cricket Ground and Sports Trust site tour but was unable to remain for the meeting MEETING NOTES Leanne Smith, Governance House Pty Ltd 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY Margaret Harvie Acknowledged that the meeting is taking place on Aboriginal lands and paid respect to Elders past, present and emerging. 2. AGENDA ITEM # 1- WELCOME & OPENING Margaret Harvie Welcomed all attendees to the twelfth meeting of the Sydney Football Stadium (SFS) Redevelopment Community Consultation Committee (CCC) and declared proceedings open at 6.51 pm. Asked for any outstanding questions arising from the tour of the site? (none tabled). DISCUSSION Committee members and guests introduced themselves to the meeting. 3. APOLOGIES The Committee noted apologies from Paula Masselos, Phillip Thallis (who was present for the tour), and Kerrie Mather.
    [Show full text]
  • Councils' Special Requirements for Displays
    20 Australian Parachute Federation Display Manual Appendix 3: Councils’ Special Requirements for Displays At the May 1999 meeting, the APF Board required the APF Office to compile and publish periodically a list of Councils’ special requirements for displays. LDOs should ensure that they replace the list in their Display Manual with a copy of this list. Following is a list of all special requirements that have been made known to the APF National Office. If other Councils have special display requirements, or if these details change, please notify the office of up-dates. [email protected] South Queensland (last updated/confirmed May 2007) SQPC adopt the following re Permanent Displays involving tandems; SQPC will not permit regular tandem skydives as display jumps unless it is at an approved training organization drop zone or as an approved satellite organization of an approved training organization with a duly appointed CI. New South Wales (last updated/confirmed October 2014) For displays into Sydney Showground, SCG, Stadiums Australia stadiums and the Olympic Park site at Homebush Bay: Day Jumps: LDO direct supervision (either on the jump or ground crew) Display PRO Site inspection by all jumpers. Night Jumps: LDO direct supervision. Display PRO and F licence practice jump into venue during daylight Victoria incorporating Tasmania (last updated/confirmed Aug 2014) MCG/Olympic Precinct/Docklands Stadium Special requirements When a crowd is in attendance at the MCG/ Olympic Precinct, or Docklands Stadium, an Certificate Class F, Display PRO, at least one jump in the last 12 months into the display target, and if not, a practice jump in the preceding 30 days using all gear intended for the display.
    [Show full text]
  • Syndrome in Big and Iconic Projects in the Public and Private Sectors
    5. Overcoming the ‘White Elephant’ Syndrome in Big and Iconic Projects in the Public and Private Sectors Scott Prasser, Faculty of Business, University of Sunshine Coast Introduction This chapter1 analyses `big,' `iconic' or `mega' projects and their impact on effective project management and also on the effective allocation of funds for priority infrastructure. It is argued that part of the problem of Australia's perceived present infrastructure shortfall is not just the lack of spending on infrastructure as many suggest. Rather, it is as much about the misallocation of spending on `big' and so called `iconic' or prestige projects that too often become expensive `white elephants' requiring considerable post-completion maintenance and support and further wasting valuable resources that could be used elsewhere. Such projects, because of their status, size, and complexity too often disrupt effective project management practices in their original scoping, assessment and implementation and fail to have clear purposes or functions. This is not a project management or even an infrastructure problem confined to Australia. Concerns about misallocation of funding of big, mega or iconic infrastructure type projects have been observed elsewhere. Flyvbjerg (2003: 3, 9) in his overview of `megaprojects' around the world noted: At the same time as many more and much larger infrastructure projects are being proposed and built around the world, it is becoming clear that many such projects have strikingly poor performance records in terms of economy, environment and public support. Cost overruns and lower than predicted revenues frequently place project viability at risk and redefine projects that were initially promoted as effective vehicles to economic growth as possible obstacles to such growth ..
    [Show full text]
  • MATCHING SPORTS EVENTS and HOSTS Published April 2013 © 2013 Sportbusiness Group All Rights Reserved
    THE BID BOOK MATCHING SPORTS EVENTS AND HOSTS Published April 2013 © 2013 SportBusiness Group All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publisher. The information contained in this publication is believed to be correct at the time of going to press. While care has been taken to ensure that the information is accurate, the publishers can accept no responsibility for any errors or omissions or for changes to the details given. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements including forecasts are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified and, consequently, the actual performance of companies mentioned in this report and the industry as a whole may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Author: David Walmsley Publisher: Philip Savage Cover design: Character Design Images: Getty Images Typesetting: Character Design Production: Craig Young Published by SportBusiness Group SportBusiness Group is a trading name of SBG Companies Ltd a wholly- owned subsidiary of Electric Word plc Registered office: 33-41 Dallington Street, London EC1V 0BB Tel. +44 (0)207 954 3515 Fax. +44 (0)207 954 3511 Registered number: 3934419 THE BID BOOK MATCHING SPORTS EVENTS AND HOSTS Author: David Walmsley THE BID BOOK MATCHING SPORTS EVENTS AND HOSTS
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Heritage Management Plan SFS-JHG-00-PLN-PM060009
    Sydney Football Stadium Redevelopment Stage 2 Construction Heritage Management Plan SFS-JHG-00-PLN-PM060009 SSD-9835 This Plan is the property of John Holland and may not be copied, distributed or used without the written consent of John Holland Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... 2 1. Revisions and distribution ................................................................................................ 4 1.1. Revisions 4 1.1.1. Distribution list...................................................................................................... 4 2. Compliance matrix ............................................................................................................ 5 3. References, definitions and abbreviations ...................................................................... 8 3.1. Definitions and abbreviations 8 4. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 9 4.1. Purpose and application 9 4.1.1. Purpose ............................................................................................................... 9 4.1.2. Objectives ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1.3. Targets ................................................................................................................ 9 4.1.4. Personnel ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stadiums Taskforce Report
    4.0 Stadiums Queensland Business Model >> Stadium Taskforce - Final Report 61 4.0 Stadiums Queensland Business Model The SQ business model is the way SQ coordinates and strategically manages its asset portfolio responsibilities. The SQ business model takes into consideration items such as SQ’s approach to market testing and outsourcing of services, as well as to the shared support services for the organisation and portfolio and to SQ’s role in stadium planning. At a venue level, the SQ business model incorporates SQ’s consideration and determination of the preferred management approach for each of its venues, taking into account specifics of the asset, the use of the venue and historic operations. SQ’s intent of applying its business model is to implement management arrangements that maximise the likelihood of individual venues and the portfolio as a whole, operating as efficiently as possible. SQ achieves this by employing a variety of venue management, venue operations and venue hiring models, in addition to portfolio-wide arrangements. Market Testing and Outsourcing As a matter of business policy, SQ consistently tests the market to establish whether services are more cost effective if delivered on an outsourced basis. SQ is incentivised to do so because of customer requirements (hirers and patrons) to contain costs so that attending venues for patrons remains affordable. The Taskforce understands that a majority of SQ business is historically outsourced, including stadium services such as ticketing, catering, security, cleaning and waste management and corporate business functions such as audit, incident management, insurance and risk management. The final small percentage of services are directly delivered by SQ if it is more cost effective to do so, or if the risk to the Queensland Government is more effectively managed.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Sports Stadiums
    We need to 'climate-proof' our sports stadiums https://theconversation.com/we-need-to-climate-proof-our-sports-stad... Close Academic rigour, journalistic flair Aerial view of the Sydney Football Stadium, which is to be rebuilt, and Sydney Cricket Ground. Questions of stadium design to deal with extreme heat are becoming more urgent. AAP January 17, 2018 6.14am AEDT For many Australians summer is synonymous with cricket and tennis. But as Author Australian summers become more prone to extreme heat conditions, sustainable and climate-adaptable stadium design has become a leading consideration for both sporting codes and governments. Paul J Govind The final Ashes test played at the Sydney Cricket Ground recently showed that the Lecturer in Enviromental Law, Macquarie University cricketing community must adapt to heatwaves made worse by climate change. Read more: Just not cricket – how climate change will make sport more risky And in recent years the Australian Open has produced many stories of both tennis players and spectators suffering in extreme heat. And more are expected over the two weeks of the current tournament. As the New South Wales government embarks on a hugely expensive rebuild of major stadiums across Sydney, now is a good time to ask whether major Australian sports venues are adequately “climate- proofed” for a warming future. 1 of 5 12/11/2020, 3:32 pm We need to 'climate-proof' our sports stadiums https://theconversation.com/we-need-to-climate-proof-our-sports-stad... Climate change is literally a ‘game changer’ The Climate Council released a report in 2016 detailing the risks of extreme heat to human health, exacerbated by climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • 1991—No. 673 SYDNEY CRICKET and SPORTS GROUND ACT 1978— BY-LAW (Relating to the Sydney Football Stadium and Regular Membership Guest Entitlements)
    1991—No. 673 SYDNEY CRICKET AND SPORTS GROUND ACT 1978— BY-LAW (Relating to the Sydney Football Stadium and regular membership guest entitlements) NEW SOUTH WALES [Published in Gazette No. 180 of 20 December 1991] HIS Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, and in pursuance of the Sydney Cricket and Sports Ground Act 1978, has been pleased to make the By-law set forth hereunder. GEORGE SOURIS Minister for Sport, Recreation and Racing. Amendments 1. The Sydney Cricket Ground By-law 1986 is amended: (a) by omitting clause 1 and by inserting instead the following clause: Citation 1. This By-law may be cited as the Sydney Cricket Ground and Sydney Football Stadium By-law 1986. (b) by omitting the definitions of “Ground”, “Lady, Guest or Club Card” and “member” from clause 2 and by inserting instead in alphabetical order the following definitions; “Ground” means such parts of the scheduled lands as are or dedicated from time to time pursuant to Part 3 of the Act, and includes the land commonly known as the Sydney Cricket Ground and the Sydney Football Stadium; “Guest or Club Card” means a Regular Member’s Guest Card, Regular Member’s Club Card, Gold Member’s Guest Card or Gold Member’s Club Card; 2 1991—No. 673 “member” means a member of the Sydney Cricket Ground, and includes a member of both the Sydney Cricket Ground and the Sydney Football Stadium; (c) by omitting from the definition of “ticket of admission” in clause 2 and from clauses 23 (4), 30, 31 (2) and 35 (11) the word “Lady,” wherever occurring; (d) by
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Football Stadium Redevelopment
    SYDNEY FOOTBALL STADIUM REDEVELOPMENT STATE SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Concept Proposal and Stage 1 Demolition SSDA 9249 APPENDIX C: Urban Design Guidelines (including Landscape Concept Plan, Shadow Diagrams, Concept Envelope Plans, Stage 1 Demolition Plan, and Public Art Strategy) SJB Architects Sydney Football Stadium Urban Design Guidelines Prepared for Infrastructure NSW Issued 6 June 2018 Level 2, 490 Crown Street Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T. 61 2 9380 9911 [email protected] sjb.com.au We create amazing places At SJB we believe that the future of the city is in generating a rich urban experience through the delivery of density and activity, facilitated by land uses, at various scales, designed for everyone. Date of Issue Issue No. Issued by Issue Purpose 08.02.18 01 TH TOC for review 26.02.18 02 TH SCG Trust Workshop Ref: #5812 20.03.18 03 TH TK Draft Version: 14 Prepared by: TH, JF, LV 27.03.18 04 TH To COX/ASPECT for Checked by: JK, FL information 29.03.18 05 TH Preliminary Issue to Contact Details: consultants for comment SJB Architects 06.04.18 06 TH Draft Issue to TK Level 2, 490 Crown Street 24.24.18 07 TH Draft Issue to TK Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia 08.05.18 08 TH Draft Issue to TK T. 61 2 9380 9911 22.05.18 09 JK Draft Issue to TK [email protected] 23.05.18 10 TH Final Issue to TK sjb.com.au 25.05.18 11 TH Final Issue #2 to TK SJB Architecture (NSW) Pty Ltd ABN 20 310 373 425 25.05.18 12 TH Final Issue #3 to TK/MO ACN 081 094 724 04.06.18 13 TH Final Issue #4 to TK/MO Adam Haddow 7188 John Pradel 7004 06.06.18 14 TH Final Issue #5 to TK/MO Executive Summary SJB has been engaged by Infrastructure NSW to prepare In a competitive rectangular stadium landscape nationally, Urban Design Guidelines which set out qualitative and the existing Sydney Football Stadium is now facing serious quantitative criteria for the design of new Sydney Football commercial and operational challenges in remaining relevant Stadium (SFS).
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Football Stadium Redevelopment
    SYDNEY FOOTBALL STADIUM REDEVELOPMENT STATE SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Concept Proposal and Stage 1 Demolition SSDA 9249 APPENDIX N: Environmentally Sustainable Design Strategy and Statement for Demolition Sydney Football Stadium Redevelopment Environmentally Sustainable Design Strategy Infrastructure NSW Reference: 501857 Revision: 1 11 May 2018 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 Level 5, 116 Military Road Neutral Bay NSW 2089 PO Box 538 Neutral Bay NSW 2089 Australia T +61 2 9465 5599 F +61 2 9465 5598 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Environmentally Sustainable Design Strategy Document ID Project number 501857 File path Client Infrastructure NSW Client contact David Riches Client reference Rev Date Revision details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) 0 5 April 2018 DRAFT for comment ZK QJ QJ 1 11 May 2018 Issue to client ZK QJ QJ Current revision 1 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name Zofia Kuypers Name Quentin Jackson Title Senior ESD Consultant Title Associate Project 501857 File 180528 SFS ESD Strategy.docx 11 May 2018 Revision 1 Contents 1 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 - Site Analysis
    Appendix 1 - Site Analysis 4 Moore Park 2040 Future Directions HASSELL 5 © 2017 A1 A1 - Site Analysis Existing Land Use Existing Land Use Victoria Barracks Moore Park serves a large residential catchment PADDINGTON including Paddington to the north-east, Kensington M O O R E OXFO P A to the south, Surry Hills to the west and the rapidly R K R R growing Green Square renewal precinct to the D D ST south-west. This growing population has reinforced the importance of the parklands, challenging its SCGT - ability to cater effectively to the needs of local SFS residents. D R I Moore Park is comprised mainly of open parkland; Moore Park V E SURRY SOUTH DOWLING STREET with the exception of the former Showground (now Moore Park East R A Fox Studios, the Entertainment Quarter and the HILLS West V SCGT - Equestrian Centre). Although Moore Park Golf E Sydney Course comprises open space, it is not publicly Cricket Fox Studios accessible parkland. Sydney A Ground N The SCGT land (including Sydney Cricket Ground & Boys High Z A C C Sydney Football Stadium) and the two secondary L E V Sydney P E D high schools (Sydney Boys High and Sydney Girls L A E N Girls High), while located outside of the Moore Park D S Hordern Entertainment boundary, make a key contribution to the overall THigh precinct. Pavilion Quarter AY RHI D The diversity of uses across Moore Park precinct are R a defining factor in the current success of the G LANG ROAD N A parklands, drawing people from a broad array of CPEC L interests into one central location.
    [Show full text]
  • K226 Description.Indd
    AGOAUKN SportsWorld TION_1 5050th Auction 25 10 2013 Große Jubiläums Live-Auktion AGON SportsWorld Kassel Fußball Olympische Spiele AGON_SportsWorld +49 (0)561 - 927 98 27 www.agon-auktion.de AGON SportsWorld 2 50th Auction 50th AGON Sportsmemorabilia Auction 25th October 2013 Contents SPORTSWORLD 25th October 2013 Lots 1 - 1039 Football Hightlights 5 Football World Cup 10 German Football 25 International Football 56 Football Autographs 71 Olympics 85 Olympic Autographs 112 Other Sports 120 The essentials in a few words: - all prices are estimates - they do not include value-added tax; 7% VAT will be additionally charged with the invoice. - if you cannot attend the public auction, you may send us a written order for your bidding. - in case of written bids the award occurs in an optimal way. For example:estimate price for the lot is 100,- €. You bid 120,- €. a) you are the only bidder. You obtain the lot for 100,-€. b) Someone else bids 100,- €. You obtain the lot for 110,- €. c) Someone else bids 130,- €. You lose. - In special cases and according to an agreement with the auctioneer you may bid by telephone during the auction. (English and French telephone service is availab- le). - The price called out ie. your bid is the award price without fee and VAT. - The auction fee amounts to 15%. - The total price is composed as follows: award price + 15% fee = subtotal + 7% VAT = total price. - The items can be paid and taken immediately after the auction. Successful orders by phone or letter will be delivered by mail (if no other arrange- ment has been made).
    [Show full text]