CR-+Ekumfi 2017+APR.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CR-+Ekumfi 2017+APR.Pdf CHAPTER ONE 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document is the sixth Annual Progress Report (APR), and an assessment of the progress of implementation of the development plan developed for the district covering the period January 2017 - December 2017. The Development Plan was prepared from the government’s Medium- Term National Development Policy Framework - The Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda II (GSGDA II), 2014-2017 with the underlying theme as socio-economic transformation, which involves a change in structure and composition of the national output in ways that enhance broad-based, inclusive and sustainable growth. The 2017 APR has been prepared from the assessment of the status of indicators and targets adopted for monitoring the progress of key policy and programme interventions. It also documents key policy measures and strategies implemented during the year to bring about the expected change in indicators. 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION FOR THE STATED PERIOD The purpose of this document is to assess key policy measures and strategies implemented during the year to bring about the expected change in indicators. 1.2 SUMMARY OF ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DMTDP Monitoring visits to project sites were organized. Four District Planning Co-ordinating Unit (DPCU) meetings and site meetings were organized, and public fora to improve social accountability in the district. Public hearings were also organized in all the Area Councils. In as much as the implementation of the Medium Term Development Plan saw a lot of progress, it was not without challenges. Some challenges were met during the implementation period. First and foremost and perhaps the most challenging was the delay in release of the District Assembly Common Fund. The DACF is a source of fund for many projects and program in the district. The delay in the release of funds for the Getfund projects stalled the implementation of projects in the education sector. Data and information on certain projects were unavailable and this made it difficult for effective monitoring of such projects. The Works Department and the Monitoring Team could not visit projects as frequently as expected due to certain logistical challenges. Annual Progress Report (2017) Ekumfi District Assembly Page 1 – PROPORTION OF THE DMTDP IMPLEMENTED ITEM INDICATORS 2017 2016 2015 2014 1. Proportion of the Annual Action Plans 85% 86% 85% 80% Implemented by the end of the year 2 Proportion of the overall Medium-Term 80% 86% 85% 80% Development Plan Implemented by the end of the year 1.3 CHALLENGES ENCOUNTERED IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DMTDP The implementation process was also beset by certain problems/issues. Prominent among them were the following: Statutory Deductions and Delay in Release of Funds Most of the activities in the plan were to be implemented by funds to be received from the Central Government (i.e. District Assembly’s Common Fund (DACF), District Development Facility (DDF) and GoG transfers to Departments). However, some statutory deductions and delay in release of funds had greatly affected the plan as such some of the activities earmark could not be implemented due to inadequate funds. Inadequate equipment, logistics and personnel The DPCU Secretariat within the planning period had only One (1) Budget Analyst, no Typist, One (1) computer laptop, and no vehicle for its activities. These proved to be woefully inadequate considering the volume of work that needed to be done. Monitoring of projects This problem was largely due to the fact that the DPCU Secretariat does not have a designated vehicle to undertake regular monitoring of programmes with the District. Report Preparation and Submission by Departments Most departments do not prepare and submit their quarterly and annual reports to the Assembly on time. This most often delays the preparation and submission of the Assembly’s progress reports to the RCC and the NDPC. Also, the departments have different reporting formats and this actually makes compilation very cumbersome. Apathy and Inadequate Capacity Building for some DPCU members Most meetings of the District Planning Co-coordinating Unit (DPCU) were attended by representatives of some DPCU members especially the decentralized departments. Also, most of the members’ capacities were not built so they could not make major contributions towards the development of the District. Annual Progress Report (2017) Ekumfi District Assembly Page 2 – 1.4 PROCESSES INVOLVED AND DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED The following members formed the Team for the preparation of the year report: District Development Planning Officer Budget Analyst District Engineer Assistant Development Planning Officers District Budget Analysts The team consulted secondary information from the various departments to gather information on the performance on the implementation of activities and programmes outlined in the AAP. Meetings were organized to validate the data collected. The team embarked on a 3-day monitoring exercise to project sites to have first hand information about the progress of project implementation. An interim report was compiled by the team and presented to members of the DPCU for their inputs, comments and validation. The report was sent to management for their comments after which copies were transmitted to relevant recipients. The major challenge encountered in the preparation of the report was the unavailability of data from the relevant Departments. Most of them were now compiling their information. Annual Progress Report (2017) Ekumfi District Assembly Page 3 – CHAPTER TWO 2.1 MONITORING AND EVALUATION ACTIVITIES As a new district, structures are being put in place to strengthen monitoring of projects. The District Planning and Co-ordinating Unit has prepared an M&E Plan to guide monitoring of the Development Plan prepared by the Assembly. The District Monitoring Team, the DPCU and other relevant Sub Committees have been formed to strengthen monitoring of projects in the district. Funds have also been allocated in the budget of the Assembly for monitoring activities. The RPCU in collaboration with GIZ has introduced monitoring software in the Central Region which is facilitating monitoring at the district level. This software enables officers and the DCE to be updated on progress of projects periodically with pictures and other relevant information. All the 4 mandatory DPCU meetings were held during the period under review. Although the district was challenged with transportation, the Works Department carried out series of project inspections to ensure that projects were carried out according to specifications. The quarterly review meetings to assess the implementation of the development plan could not be carried out due to inadequate funding. Steps would be outlined to undertake this review to keep other stakeholders abreast with the implementation of projects and programmes. 2.2 PROGRAMMES / ACTIVITIES REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2.2.1 ENSURING AND SUSTAINING MACROECONOMIC STABILITY The main objective under this thematic area was to improve fiscal revenue mobilization. Revenue mobilization drive was also embarked upon. Series of community sensitization meetings were organized to educate citizens on the need to meet their tax obligations. The fee fixing resolution could however not be gazetted to facilitate prosecutions. The numerical strength of the Permanent Revenue Collector was four (4) whiles Commission Revenue Collectors were three (3) due to the following reasons; Even though the commission collectors enjoyed 30% commission on their generation, they still lamented that, the percentage was inadequate and as such saw revenue collection as not profitable employment. About 80% of the collectors vacated their post as a result of late release of commission due to them. Political Interference (Apathy) Lack of market / businesses / industries Annual Progress Report (2017) Ekumfi District Assembly Page 4 – INTERNALLY GENERATED FUND (IGF) PERFORMANCE REVENUE ITEMS 2017 BUDGET ACTUALS AS AT % DECEMBER 2017 PERFORMANCE RATES 5,000.00 1,983.74 39.7 LANDS 15,435.00 42,520.00 275.5 FEES 17,986.00 7,695.50 42.8 FINES 33,905.00 19,126.34 56.4 LICENSES 19,698.00 32,261.00 163.8 RENT 2,200.00 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS 4,776.00 0 0 TOTAL 99,000.00 103,586.00 104.6 Source: Ekumfi District Assembly, 2018 2.2.2 ENHANCED COMPETITIVENESS OF EKUMFI DISTRICT’S PRIVATE SECTOR The district is predominantly agrarian and Small and Medium Enterprises are not well organized. The objective in the Development Plan was to build a data base on small and medium scale enterprises as well as build their capacity and create the enabling environment for them to promote their activities. The district has potential in the salt industry due to availability of lagoons at the coastal communities. The Assembly initiated the move to acquire land at Abor along the Trans Ecowas Highway as part of the measures to create an enabling environment for private sector participation in the The BAC held one stakeholders forum for the year under review. The forum was graced with representation from the members of the SPGE subcommittee, LBA executives and other business owners TRAINING PROGRAMS CARRIED OUT IN THE YEAR PERIOD TYPE OF TARGET GENDER NO. OF ACTIVITY CLIENTS PARTICIPANTS MALE FEMALE TOTAL 1st Bead Making Youth 0 31 31 31 Annual Progress Report (2017) Ekumfi District Assembly Page 5 – PERIOD TYPE OF TARGET GENDER NO. OF ACTIVITY CLIENTS PARTICIPANTS Quarter Soap Making Women Group 3 18 21 21 Group
Recommended publications
  • Ghana Marine Canoe Frame Survey 2016
    INFORMATION REPORT NO 36 Republic of Ghana Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development FISHERIES COMMISSION Fisheries Scientific Survey Division REPORT ON THE 2016 GHANA MARINE CANOE FRAME SURVEY BY Dovlo E, Amador K, Nkrumah B et al August 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 2 LIST of Table and Figures .................................................................................................................... 3 Tables............................................................................................................................................... 3 Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.2 AIM OF SURVEY ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 PROFILES OF MMDAs IN THE REGIONS ......................................................................................... 5 2.1 VOLTA REGION .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 GREATER ACCRA REGION .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana Poverty Mapping Report
    ii Copyright © 2015 Ghana Statistical Service iii PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Ghana Statistical Service wishes to acknowledge the contribution of the Government of Ghana, the UK Department for International Development (UK-DFID) and the World Bank through the provision of both technical and financial support towards the successful implementation of the Poverty Mapping Project using the Small Area Estimation Method. The Service also acknowledges the invaluable contributions of Dhiraj Sharma, Vasco Molini and Nobuo Yoshida (all consultants from the World Bank), Baah Wadieh, Anthony Amuzu, Sylvester Gyamfi, Abena Osei-Akoto, Jacqueline Anum, Samilia Mintah, Yaw Misefa, Appiah Kusi-Boateng, Anthony Krakah, Rosalind Quartey, Francis Bright Mensah, Omar Seidu, Ernest Enyan, Augusta Okantey and Hanna Frempong Konadu, all of the Statistical Service who worked tirelessly with the consultants to produce this report under the overall guidance and supervision of Dr. Philomena Nyarko, the Government Statistician. Dr. Philomena Nyarko Government Statistician iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Campaigns on Child Labor and Trafficking
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PROJECT (SFMP) Radio Campaigns on Child Labor and Trafficking SEPTEMBER, 2017 This publication is available electronically in the following locations: The Coastal Resources Center http://www.crc.uri.edu/projects_page/ghanasfmp/ Ghanalinks.org https://ghanalinks.org/elibrary search term: SFMP USAID Development Clearing House https://dec.usaid.gov/dec/content/search.aspx search term: Ghana SFMP For more information on the Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project, contact: USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project Coastal Resources Center Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island 220 South Ferry Rd. Narragansett, RI 02882 USA Tel: 401-874-6224 Fax: 401-874-6920 Email: [email protected] Citation: Friends of the Nation. (2017). Radio Campaign on Child Labor and Trafficking. The USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island and Friends of the Nation. GH2014_COM049_FoN. 36 pp. Authority/Disclaimer: Prepared for USAID/Ghana under Cooperative Agreement (AID-641-A-15-00001), awarded on October 22, 2014 to the University of Rhode Island, and entitled the USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). This document is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the SFMP team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the cooperating organizations. As such, the contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the SFMP team and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • PTF Bi Annual Newsletter Dec 2020 – May 2021
    POWER to the Fishers Project Biannual Newsletter December 2020 – May 2021Edition In This Issue: ❖ Training on Best Fish Handling Practices ❖ Construction of Fish Processing Centers ❖ Engagement with Fisherfolk on Management Regime ❖ Inauguration of Fish Processing Centers ❖ Partnership Agreement with CCM ❖ NHIS Registration & Renewal Exercise ❖ Meeting with Financial Service Providers ❖ Year 2 Learning Workshop ❖ VSLA Formation & Monitoring ❖ Enterprise Development Training ❖ Inter-District Dialogue Funded by: Implemented by: Community Centered Training on Best Fish Construction Activities (Smoking Centres, Stove Handling Practices and Use of the Ahotor Oven. Host Assessments & Provision of Stoves) The project strategically adopted a hybrid approach, which combines the fish-processing Centre (FPC) model and the stove host model. Following this approach, the FPC model focuses on the construction of modern fish processing centres for communal use, while the stove host model aims at the construction of improved fish smoking ovens in the households of selected fish processors for their use. Owing to the nature of the fish smoking business in the coastal communities, the stove host model is deemed as the best approach to combine with the FPC model to Training on improved fish packaging methods in the Otuam enhance the fast rate of adoption of the fish smoking community The Power to the Fishers project organized training technology. Moreover, during the preparatory phase sessions for fish processors in Kesewokan, Apo and Anlo towards the construction of the FPCs, the project faced Beach communities in the Shama district in December 2020, some challenges, which justifies the need for the stove and also for fish processors in Otuam, Kontankore, host model.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Annual Progress Report
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICE 2013 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT Local Government Service Secretariat (LGSS) University Post Office, Private Mail Bag L-52, Legon-Accra, Ghana Tel. + 233 – 302 – 662799, 677929 Fax + 233 – 302 – 662799 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.lgs.gov.gh/ December 2013 2013 Annual Progress Report – Local Government Service FOREWORD Since the early 1980’s, decentralization has been pursued by successive governments as a means to ensure sustainable development across the country. To this end, decentralization and local governance was entrenched in the provisions of the 1992 Constitution. The Local Government Service (Local Government Service Secretariat, Regional Coordinating Councils, and Metropolitan Municipal and District Assemblies) was established to manage the decentralization process including reporting on the activities of the Service to inform policy. The Local Government Service (LGS) has been churning out Annual Progress Reports to serve as documentary evidence on the progress of the Service to inform its numerous stakeholders. The 2013 Annual Progress Report reflects the status of implementation of programmes across the Local Government Service. It documents the strides made by the Service in collaboration with its stakeholders and Development Partners (DPs) for the 2013 fiscal year. The highlights of the report include progress made in the area of deepening Administrative Decentralization. Another aspect touches on training and development, as capacity building forms the bedrock of the activities of the Secretariat. It also features strides made with regards to organizational development and the implementation of the Communication Strategy of the Service. The report also includes a summary of some activities undertaken by the ten (10) Regional Coordinating Councils (RCCs).
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Capabilities in Ghana's Districts
    Manufacturing capabilities in Ghana’s districts A guidebook for “One District One Factory” James Dzansi David Lagakos Isaac Otoo Henry Telli Cynthia Zindam May 2018 When citing this publication please use the title and the following reference number: F-33420-GHA-1 About the Authors James Dzansi is a Country Economist at the International Growth Centre (IGC), Ghana. He works with researchers and policymakers to promote evidence-based policy. Before joining the IGC, James worked for the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change, where he led several analyses to inform UK energy policy. Previously, he served as a lecturer at the Jonkoping International Business School. His research interests are in development economics, corporate governance, energy economics, and energy policy. James holds a PhD, MSc, and BA in economics and LLM in petroleum taxation and finance. David Lagakos is an associate professor of economics at the University of California San Diego (UCSD). He received his PhD in economics from UCLA. He is also the lead academic for IGC-Ghana. He has previously held positions at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis as well as Arizona State University, and is currently a research associate with the Economic Fluctuations and Growth Group at the National Bureau of Economic Research. His research focuses on macroeconomic and growth theory. Much of his recent work examines productivity, particularly as it relates to agriculture and developing economies, as well as human capital. Isaac Otoo is a research assistant who works with the team in Ghana. He has an MPhil (Economics) from the University of Ghana and his thesis/dissertation tittle was “Fiscal Decentralization and Efficiency of the Local Government in Ghana.” He has an interest in issues concerning local government and efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Gomoa West District
    GOMOA WEST DISTRICT Copyright © 2014 Ghana Statistical Service ii PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT No meaningful developmental activity can be undertaken without taking into account the characteristics of the population for whom the activity is targeted. The size of the population and its spatial distribution, growth and change over time, in addition to its socio-economic characteristics are all important in development planning. A population census is the most important source of data on the size, composition, growth and distribution of a country’s population at the national and sub-national levels. Data from the 2010 Population and Housing Census (PHC) will serve as reference for equitable distribution of national resources and government services, including the allocation of government funds among various regions, districts and other sub-national populations to education, health and other social services. The Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) is delighted to provide data users, especially the Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies, with district-level analytical reports based on the 2010 PHC data to facilitate their planning and decision-making. The District Analytical Report for the Gomoa West District is one of the 216 district census reports aimed at making data available to planners and decision makers at the district level. In addition to presenting the district profile, the report discusses the social and economic dimensions of demographic variables and their implications for policy formulation, planning and interventions. The conclusions and recommendations drawn from the district report are expected to serve as a basis for improving the quality of life of Ghanaians through evidence- based decision-making, monitoring and evaluation of developmental goals and intervention programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDELINES for PREPARATION of 2015-2017 BUDGET Prepared and Issued by Ministry of Finance
    GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF 2015-2017 BUDGET REPUBLIC OF GHANA Prepared and Issued by Ministry of Finance th 27 June, 2014 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AAP Annual Action Plan CoA Chart of Accounts DACF District Assemblies Common Fund DDF District Development Facility EPVS E-Payment Voucher System G&S Goods and services GFS Government Finance Statistics GIFMIS Ghana Integrated Financial Management Information System GoG Government of Ghana GSGDA Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda II L.I. Legislative Instrument MDAs Ministries, Departments and Agencies MMDAs Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies MMDCEs Metropolitan, Municipal and District Chief Executives MOF Ministry of Finance MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework NTR/IGFs Non-Tax Revenue/ Internally Generated Funds PBB Programme Based Budgeting PBWGs Programme Budget Working Groups S/DMTDP Sector/District Medium Term Development Plan UDG Urban Development Grant ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... iv 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 1 2. GHANA SHARED GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENDA (GSGDA II), 2014-2017 ...... 3 3. MEDIUM TERM FISCAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Procurement Plan-Goods Country/Organisation: Community Water & Sanitation Agency Project/Programme: P120026 Sustainable Rural water & Sanitation Project Credit #: 4789 GH BASIC DATA Public Disclosure Authorized Procu Pre-or Prior Packa Estimated Lot remen Post or ge Amount Description* Numb t Qualif Post Numb in US er Metho icatio Revie er $'000 d n w If Prequalification Norm Duration of Proc Steps add 7-13 wks Public Disclosure Authorized List of Contracts Public Disclosure Authorized 754270v20PROP00t0Plan00020130Update.xls 1 of 36 2/21/2013 2:55 AM Public Disclosure Authorized Procurement Plan-Goods Total Cost 754270v20PROP00t0Plan00020130Update.xls 2 of 36 2/21/2013 2:55 AM Procurement Plan-Goods Country/Organisation: Community Water & Sanitation Agency Project/Programme: P120026 Sustainable Rural water & Sanitation Project If Post-Review, No-objection Dates are not needed Draft Bid Documents, Spec Proc including specs and Credit #: 4789 GH Notice Bidding Period Bid Evaluation quantities, draft SPN Advert On-line Prep & No- Bid Submission Plan vs. UNDB Bid Closing- Description* Submission objection Invitation Bid Eval Actual Gateway Opening by Ex Agency Date Date Rpt Nat Press Plan 4 - 7 wks 1 - 1.5 wks 1.5 - 2 wks 6 to 12 wks 1.5 - 3 wks Norm Duration of Proc Steps Actual List of Contracts 754270v20PROP00t0Plan00020130Update.xls 3 of 36 2/21/2013 2:55 AM Procurement Plan-Goods Plan Actual Total Cost Plan 754270v20PROP00t0Plan00020130Update.xls 4 of 36 2/21/2013 2:55 AM Procurement Plan-Goods Country/Organisation: Community Water &
    [Show full text]
  • EVALUATION Fisheries and Coastal Management Capacity Building Support Project Final Performance Evaluation Report
    EVALUATION Fisheries and Coastal Management Capacity Building Support Project Final Performance Evaluation Report 2020 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by Della E. McMillan, Lynn Hurtak, Annie Dela Akanko, and Evans Arizi. FISHERIES AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT CAPACITY BUILDING SUPPORT PROJECT FINAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION February 28, 2020 Contracted under 641-A18-FY14-IL#007 Prepared by: Della E. McMillan Lynn Hurtak Annie Dela Akanko With Technical Advisor Evans Arizi Submitted by: USAID/Ghana Monitoring, Evaluation, and Technical Support Services (METSS) II Project Photo credit: Centre for Coastal Management, University of Cape Coast. Photo Archive. February 28, 2020. Photo taken by FCMCBSP drone. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................ II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ V 1.0. EVALUATION OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1. EVALUATION PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mfantseman Municipal Assembly
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW OF MFANTSEMAN MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY ................. 3 1.0 BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF MFANTSEMAN MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY ....................... 3 2.0 POLICY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 6 3.0 VISION STATEMENT ............................................................................................................. 6 4.0 MISSION STATEMENT .......................................................................................................... 6 5.0 GOAL ......................................................................................................................................... 6 6.0 CORE FUNCTIONS ................................................................................................................ 7 7.0 MUNICIPAL ECONOMY ......................................................................................................... 7 8.0 REVENUE MOBILIZATION STRATEGIES FOR KEY REVENUE SOURCES ........... 12 9.0 POLICY OUTCOME INDICATORS AND TARGETS ....................................................... 13 PART B: BUDGET PROGRAMME SUMMARY ............................................................................. 14 PROGRAMME1: MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION ..................................................... 14 PROGRAMME 2: INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT ............................ 24 PROGRAMME 3: SOCIAL SERVICES DELIVERY ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clat Regional District Child Protection Committees Durbars with Community Advocates
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PROJECT (SFMP) Clat Regional District Child Protection Committees Interface Durbars with Community Advocates SEPTEMBER, 2018 This publication is available electronically in the following locations: The Coastal Resources Center http://www.crc.uri.edu/projects_page/ghanasfmp/ Ghanalinks.org https://ghanalinks.org/elibrary search term: SFMP USAID Development Clearing House https://dec.usaid.gov/dec/content/search.aspx search term: Ghana SFMP For more information on the Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project, contact: USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project Coastal Resources Center Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island 220 South Ferry Rd. Narragansett, RI 02882 USA Tel: 401-874-6224 Fax: 401-874-6920 Email: [email protected] Citation: Johnson, Kbr (2018). CLaT Regional District Child Protection Committees Durbars with Community Advocates. The USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island and Friends of the Nation. GH2014_ACT175_FON. 25 pp Authority/Disclaimer: Prepared for USAID/Ghana under Cooperative Agreement (AID-641-A-15-00001), awarded on October 22, 2014 to the University of Rhode Island, and entitled the USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). This document is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the SFMP team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the cooperating organizations. As such, the contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the SFMP team and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]