I hereby give notice that a hearing by commissioners will be held on:
Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019 Time: 9.30am Meeting Room: Council Chambers Venue: Level 1, Orewa Service Centre, 50 Centreway Road, Orewa, Auckland
HEARING AGENDA LAND BETWEEN STATE HIGHWAY 1 AND MATAKANA ROAD WARKWORTH VOLUME TWO AUCKLAND TRANSPORT
COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson Alan Watson Commissioners Michael Parsonson Peter Reaburn
Tanisha Hazelwood HEARINGS ADVISOR
Telephone: 09 890 4940 or 021 560 871 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as a decision of Council. Should Commissioners require further information relating to any reports, please contact the Hearings Advisor.
WHAT HAPPENS AT A HEARING At the start of the hearing, the Chairperson will introduce the hearing panel and council staff and will briefly outline the procedure. The Chairperson may then call upon the parties present to introduce themselves to the panel. The Chairperson is addressed as Mr Chairman or Madam Chair.
Any party intending to give written or spoken evidence in Māori or speak in sign language should advise the hearings advisor at least five working days before the hearing so that a qualified interpreter can be provided.
Catering is not provided at the hearing. Please note that the hearing may be audio recorded.
Scheduling submitters to be heard
A timetable will be prepared approximately one week before the hearing for all submitters who have returned their hearing attendance form. Please note that during the course of the hearing changing circumstances may mean the proposed timetable is delayed or brought forward. Submitters wishing to be heard are requested to ensure they are available to attend the hearing and present their evidence when required. The hearings advisor will advise submitters of any changes to the timetable at the earliest possible opportunity.
The hearing procedure
The usual hearing procedure is: • The Requiring Authority (the applicant) will be called upon to present their case. The Requiring Authority may be represented by legal counsel or consultants and may call witnesses in support of the application. After the Requiring Authority has presented their case, members of the hearing panel may ask questions to clarify the information presented • The relevant local board may wish to present comments. These comments do not constitute a submission however the Local Government Act allows the local board to make the interests and preferences of the people in its area known to the hearing panel. If present, the local board will speak between the applicant and any submitters. • Submitters (for and against the application) are then called upon to speak. Submitters may also be represented by legal counsel or consultants and may call witnesses on their behalf. The hearing panel may then question each speaker. The council officer’s report will identify any submissions received outside of the submission period. At the hearing, late submitters may be asked to address the panel on why their submission should be accepted. Late submitters can speak only if the hearing panel accepts the late submission • Submitters wishing to present written information (evidence) in support of their applications or submissions should provide the number of copies indicated in the notification letter • Only members of the hearing panel can ask questions about submissions or evidence. Attendees may suggest questions for the panel to ask but it does not have to ask them. No cross-examination - either by the applicant or by those who have lodged submissions – is permitted at the hearing • After the Requiring Authority and submitters have presented their cases, the chairperson may call upon council officers to comment on any matters of fact or clarification • When those who have lodged submissions and wish to be heard have completed their presentations, the Requiring Authority or their representative has the right to summarise the application and reply to matters raised by submitters. Hearing panel members may further question the Requiring Authority at this stage
• The chairperson then generally closes the hearing and the Requiring Authority, submitters and their representatives leave the room. The hearing panel will then deliberate “in committee” and make a decision on the resource consent application and a recommendation to the Requiring Authority on the Notice of Requirement. The Requiring Authority then has 30 working days to make a decision and inform council of that decision. You will be informed in writing of both decisions separately, the reasons for the decision and what your appeal rights are • The decision on the resource consent component is usually available within 15 working days of the hearing closing.
Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent application Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019
A NOTIFIED DISCRETIONARY ACTIVITY RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION BY AUCKLAND TRANSPORT AND
A NOTIFIED NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT TO THE AUCKLAND COUNCIL UNITARY PLAN RODNEY SECTION DISTRICT PLAN BY AUCKLAND TRANSPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO:
VOLUME ONE Combined reporting officers report 13 – 120 Attachment 1 Application 121 – 122 Application material has not been reproduced and can be found here:
Resource consent - https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/have-your-say/have-your-say- notified-resource-consent/notified-resource-consent-applications- open- submissions/Pages/ResourceConsentApplication.aspx?itemId=258& applNum=BUN60328269
Notice of requirement – https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/have-your-say/hearings/find- hearing/Pages/Hearing-documents.aspx?HearingId=275
Attachment 2 Updated plans 19 February 2019 123 – 148 Attachment 3 Section 92 responses 149 – 198 Attachment 4 Memo and supporting documentation regarding changes to the 199 – 244 application Attachment 5 Technical memo stormwater – Jack Turner 245 – 262 Attachment 6 Technical memo development engineering – Samuel Holmes 263 – 270 Attachment 7 Technical memo freshwater ecology – Rhian Ingley 271 – 314 Attachment 8 Technical memo – terrestrial ecology – Rue Statham 315 – 326 Attachment 9 Technical memo earthworks – Matt Byrne 327 – 342 Attachment 10 Technical memo traffic – Leo Hills 343 – 358 Attachment 11 Technical memo heritage – Joe Mills 359 – 366 Attachment 12 Technical memo noise – John Styles 367 – 378 Attachment 13 Technical memo groundwater – Sian France 379 – 398 Attachment 14 Technical memo Landscape Architecture – Julia Wick 399 – 406 Attachment 15 Technical memo open space – James Hendra 407 – 416 Attachment 16 Summary of submissions 417 – 426 Attachment 17a Copies of submissions – Notice of Requirement 427 – 542
Page 5 Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent application Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019
VOLUME TWO
Attachment 17b Copies of submissions – Resource Consent 543 – 890 Attachment 18 Discussions with submitters regarding intersections access 891 – 894 Attachment 19 Rodney Local Board comment 895 – 900 Attachment 20 Email from David Nelson regarding showgrounds link 901 – 906 Attachment 21 Recommended regional consent conditions 907 – 960 Attachment 22 Permitted activity review – Air quality and contaminated land 961 – 968 Attachment 23 Letter to Auckland Council regarding iwi engagement and 969 – 972 consultation Attachment 24 Meeting notes – AT and NZTA discussion with Healthy Waters 973 – 976 Attachment 25 Plan Change 14 extract 977 – 1006 Attachment 26 NoR recommended conditions 1007 – 1018
Reporting Officers: Resource Consent, Gemma Hayes - Notice of Requirement, Alison Pye
Reporting on a Resource Consent application for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project. The reporting officer is recommending, subject to contrary or additional information being received at the hearing, that the application be GRANTED, subject to certain condtions.
Reporting on a Notice of Requirement for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road. The reporting officer is recommending that the notice(s) of requirement be CONFIRMED, subject to the amended and additional conditions and modifications.
APPLICANT / REQUIRING AUTHORITY: Auckland Transport
Page 6 Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent application Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019
SUBMITTERS ON NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT: Page 429 Shelley Anne Trotter 591 Sandspit road Warkworth Page 431 Matakana Community Group 11 Ward Rd, RD 5 Warkworth Page 433 Colin R Beckwith 273 Green Road Matakana Page 435 Wayne Franks 35 Whitmore Road Warkworth Page 437 Robin Barclay Page 439 Wendy J Parkins 181 Govan Wilson Road Matakana Page 441 Warkworth A&P Society 95A Point Wells Road Point Wells Page 445 Phil Francis PO Box 89 Matakana Page 447 Peter Hogg 24 Oak River Drive Warkworth New Zealand Transport attn: Belinda Petersen. System Design and Page 449 Agency Principal Planner Delivery Page 452 Roger and Patte Williams 56 Alnwick Street Warkworth Page 455 Warkworth Land Company attn: Vaughn Bell PO Box 5908 Page 467 Warwick and Hueline Massey PO Box 335 Warkworth c/- Terra Nova Page 469 Stellan Trust attn: Shane Hartley Planning Ltd Barker and Page 485 Stubbs Farm Estate Limited Burnette O'Connor Associates Ltd c/- Terra Nova Page 494 Goately Holdings limited attn: Shane Hartley Planning Ltd c/- Terra Nova Page 509 Karariki Limited attn: Shane Hartley Planning Ltd c/- Terra Nova Page 514 Alan and Jan Stevenson attn: Shane Hartley Planning Ltd One Warkworth Business attn: Chris Murphy, c/-Murray Chapman, Page 519 Association Chairperson Association Manager c/- Kate Madsen, Page 521 Northern Arena attn: Matthew Saunders Paua Planning The National Trading Page 537 Company of New Zealand attn: Douglas Allan Ellis Gould Limited Mahurangi Community Sport Zest Communications Page 540 Auckland and Recreation Collective and Marketing
SUBMITTERS ON RESOURCE CONSENT: Page 545 A. G. Dryden Ltd C/- Alistair Dryden 6, The Rise Page 547 Allan Moors 25 Day Dawn Crescent Omaha Page 549 Andrew Daly 74d France Street Newton Page 551 Anne Marie Fisher 903,8 Hereford Street Freemans Bay Page 553 Anne Waddington 15 Ashmore Crescent Warkworth Page 555 Antony Paul Kortegast 6 Hiriri Avenue Remuera Page 557 Arlett Farland 142 anderson road RD5 Warkworth Armacup Maritime Services Page 559 C/- Mark Ching PO Box 106-001 Ltd
Page 7 Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent application Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019
Page 561 Arnie Gielens 66 Atkin Avenue Auckland 1071 Page 563 AZ & JM Tisot Ltd c/- Joanne Marie Tisot 7 Meiklejohn Way Page 565 AZ & JM Tisot Ltd c/- Zvonko Tisot 7 Meiklejohn Way Page 567 Barbara Gorton PO Box 46173 Herne Bay Page 569 Ben Saunders PO Box 259081 Botany L1, 17 Elizabeth Page 571 BetterWorld NZ C/- Bevan Woodward Street Page 575 Betty Anne Rutter 46 Quebec Road Milford Page 577 Brett Chamberlain 11a Norana Avenue Remuera Page 579 Brian Holmes 20A Ruby Cove Auckland 0986 Page 581 Bruce Neville Batty 15B Craig Road Milford Page 583 Bruce Snowsill 43 Riveereside Drive Point Wells Page 585 Bryn Jamieson PO Box 208 Auckland 0947 Page 587 Campbell Bruce Jackson 10 Edmund Street Auckland 1071 Page 589 Carmel Paul 14 Darroch Slope Omaha Page 591 Charles Orrell Skinner 189 Saint Andrews Road Epsom Page 593 Charlie Meade 418 Remuera road Remuera 1050 Page 595 Chris Allan 9 Tuatua Lane Omaha Page 597 Chris Ryder 47 Arthur Street Ellerslie Page 599 Colin Leuschke 221A Ponsonby Road Freemans Bay Page 601 Daniel McCarthy 31 Tuna Place Omaha Page 603 David Orchard 5A Buckley Road Auckland 1023 Page 605 David Price 15 Kitty Frazer Lane Omaha Page 607 Deborah Harrison-Flynn 16 Mangatawhiri Road Omaha Page 609 Deborah Louise Bower 3a Hope Street Grey Lynn Page 611 Denis Horner PO Box 307 Matakana Page 613 Denise Crimp 502 Leigh Road Whangateau Page 615 Diane Bennett 2 O'Neill's Avenue Takapuna Page 617 Donal O'Sullivan PO Box 302421 North Harbour Page 619 Donald Nixon 135 Omaha Drive Omaha Page 621 Elizabeth Corlett 77 Omaha Valley Road Omaha Valley Page 623 Elizabeth Jane Winstone 17 Esme Grove RD6 Page 625 Estelle Tant PO Box 25601 St Heliers Page 627 Euan Glenn Beattie 12 Kitirawa Road Remuera Forest and Bird Warkworth Page 629 C/- Roger Williams 65 Alnwick Street Area Page 633 Gavin Hamilton PO Box 333 Point Wells 0986 Page 635 Gemma Wills 68A Tarawera Terrace St Heliers Page 637 Gerard Crombie 9 Bannings Way Hobsonville Page 639 Glen Hosking 30 The Terrace Herald Island Page 641 Glyn Evan Williams 186/31 Mansel Drive Warkworth
Page 8 Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent application Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019
C/- Terra Nova Planning Page 643 Goately Holdings Ltd PO Box 466 Ltd Page 659 Graeme Ross Pinfold 41 Allum Street Kohimarama Page 661 Grant Shaw 58 Pah Road Epsom Page 663 Heather Robinson 6 Niccol Avenue Narrow Neck Page 665 Helen Slater 110 Percy Street Warkworth 0910 Page 667 Ines Curin 295 Point Wells Road Warkworth Page 669 James Dryden 23 Ida Way Omaha Page 671 James Howard Fletcher 2 Green Road Matakana Page 673 James Mitchell 2/18 Tuhaere Street Orakei Page 675 Jason Morrison PO Box 652 Warkworth Page 677 Jennifer and Phil Francis PO Box 89 Matakana Page 679 Jeremy Scott 109 Churchill road Murrays Bay Page 681 Jo Haswell 7 Lysnar Road RD5 Warkworth Page 683 Joan Ashworth 50 The Parade Auckland 1071 Page 685 Joanne Barker PO Box 82 013 Highland Park Page 687 Johannes Slabbert 20 Christopher Lane Woodcocks Page 689 John Alfred Cowan 5/16 Atkin Avenue Mission Bay Page 691 John Linton 5 Karahu Lane Omaha Beach Page 693 John Robert Chetwynd 170 Mangatawhiri Road Omaha 0986 Page 694 John Stuart Taylor 7b Kenneth Small Place Remuera Page 695 Julie Barclay 6 Davie Martin Road RD1 Karen Pegrume on behalf of C/- Better Living 460 Kaipara Flats Page 697 White Light Family Landscapes Ltd road Page 749 Karl Moreton 10 Rangitoto Terrace Auckland 0620 Page 751 Kenneth Mathew Hunter 60 Hill Street Warkworth 0910 Page 753 Kerri Patricia Meuli 1B/28 Market Place The Parc Page 755 Kim Bennett 27 Paraoa Crescent Omaha Page 757 Les Fejos 14 Darroch Slope Omaha Page 759 Liz Sharek 28 Tamahunga Drive RD5 Warkworth Page 761 Luis Casas-Peschard 8 Galaxy Drive Mairangi Bay Page 763 Lynn Mellsopp 96 Frost Road Leigh C/- Jillian Elizabeth Page 765 Mackenzie Country Trust 24 Meiklejohn Way Heath Stone Page 767 Margaret Florence Collie 501/18 St Martins Lane Grafton Page 769 Mark Brighouse 63 Point Wells Road Point Wells Page 771 Mark Richard Bower PO Box 147192 Ponsonby PO Box 62-547 Page 773 Martin Personnel Ltd C/- Mark Douglas Greenlane C/- Omaha Beach Page 775 Martin Roland Dancy 424 Whitmore Road Community Inc Page 777 Matakana Community Group C/- Simon Barclay 11 Ward Road Page 779 Michael Dowd 7 St Anne Place RD6
Page 9 Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent application Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019
Page 781 Michael Thomas 38 Campbell Road Campbell's Beach Page 783 Mike Francis C/- General Store Hauraki Road Leigh Page 785 Mike Prebble PO Box 90-352 Auckland Central Page 787 Mohammed Faris Azimullah 19 Tohora Crescent Omaha Page 789 Murray James Beatson 18 Inanga Lane Omaha Page 791 Murray Ward 34A Beach Road Auckland 0620 368B Mahurangi East Page 793 Nadia Els Snells Beach Road Page 795 Nigel Tse PO Box 74233 Greenlane Page 797 Noel Coom 2/14 Otakau Road Auckland 0620 Page 799 Oliver Wills 68a Tarawera Terrace Auckland 1071 Page 801 Pat Carrigan 2 Kotiri Street St Heliers 1071 Page 803 Paul Head 3 Patiki Place Omaha Beach Page 805 Paul Heiplik 17 Taumata Road Omaha Page 807 Paul Robert King 54 Mangatawhiri Road Warkworth 0986 Page 809 Peggy Lowe 17 Landscape Road Mt Eden Page 811 Peter Hogg 24 Oak River Drive RD5 Warkworth Page 813 Peter MacLeod 199 Bleakhouse Road Auckland 2014 Page 815 Peter Pettit 6 Ingram Road Remuera Page 817 Peter Thomas 102 Omaha Drive Omaha Page 819 Phil Hadfield 8 Rural View Lane Warkworth 0910 Page 821 Philip Joseph Molloy PO Box 62635 Greenlane Page 823 Philip Winstone PO Box 99253 New Market C/- Point Wells Citizens Page 825 Graeme Beals & Ratepayers 16B Waimanu Place Association Page 827 Richard Harris PO Box 46 294 Herne Bay Page 829 Richard Holden PO Box 28488 Remuera Page 831 Richard Patirck Longdon PO Box 297 Matakana Page 833 Sandra Cathrine Winger 58 Clinton Road RD6 Page 835 Sarah Gunn 11 Hexham Street Warkworth 0910 Page 837 SB 68 Bob Street Auckland Page 839 Sharron Marshall 57 Victoria Street Warkworth 0910 Page 840 Shauna Thorburn 471a Wyllie Road Warkworth Page 841 Shelley Anne Trotter 591 Sandspit Road RD2 Page 843 Sheryll Frances Keane 6 Rivendell Place Warkworth 0910 Page 845 Simon Robert Demler 89 Omaha Valley Road Big Omaha Page 847 Simon Watts 24 Richmond Avenue Northcote Point Page 849 Stephen Crockett 265 Omaha Drive Warkworth Page 851 Stephen Gutman PO Box 47017 Ponsonby Page 853 Stephen M Hamilton 29 Mahoe Avenue Remuera
Page 10 Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent application Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019
Page 855 Stephen Michael Reynolds PO Box 677 Warkworth 0941 PO Box 303161 Page 857 Terry Anderson Auckland 0751 Rosedale Page 859 Terry Cornelius 15/8 Tobago Place Sunnynook 2A/381 Hibiscus Coast Page 861 Terry Tolich Orewa 0931 Highway Page 863 Tim Watts Matakana Auckland Page 865 Tom Berkovits 123 Ladies Mile Auckland 1051 Page 867 Tony Gorton 6 Kutai Lane Omaha Page 869 Vadim Tarasoff Unit 11 22 Kilarney Street Page 871 Verena Steele 76 Falls Road Warkworth 190c Ahuroa Valley Page 873 Victoria Joule RD1 Warkworth Road Page 875 Vivienne Louise Redding 20 Tohunga Crescent Parnell Wallace Roy Maxwell Page 877 10 Kildare Avenue St. Heliers Jackson Page 878 Wayne Drinnian PO Box 584 Warkworth Page 879 Wayne Michael Mccarthy 13 Riverside Drive Point Wells 368B Mahurangi East Page 881 Will McKay Snells Beach Road Page 883 Will Selles 29 John Stokes Terrace Remuera Page 885 William Freeth 21 Meiklejohn Way Omaha Beach Page 887 William James Swain 22b tarawera terrace St Heliers Page 889 Winifred Ann Skinner 189 Saint Andrew's Road Epsom LATE SUBMITTER: Page 834 Sandy Meharry Clayden Road Warkworth
Page 11 Notice of Requirement and Resource Consent application Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth Date: Wednesday 27 March 2019
Page 12
ATTACHMENT 17b
RESOURCE CONSENT SUBMISSIONS
543
544 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3225] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:30:38 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Alistair Dryden
Organisation name: A.G.Dryden Ltd
Contact phone number: +64 274982740
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 6,The Rise St Heliers Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support application because present Hill Street intersection is terrible and Puhoi motorway and Matakana Link Road will be great improvement.
What are the reasons for your submission? I think road should be 4 lanes to support extra growth and avoid higher costs of later construction when road is congested.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Make 4 lanes.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
545 546 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3283] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 7:30:12 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Allan Moors
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 094229773
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 25 Day Dawn Crescent Omaha Warkworth Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES V 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS V TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING $89 M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN .
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS. ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
547 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
548 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3228] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:45:51 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Andrew Daly
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021747129
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 74d France Street Newton Auckland 1010
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Matakana round-bout Cycle & pedestrian requirements Location of link connection from Sate highway one Lighting requirements
What are the reasons for your submission? The access location off State highway one means the majority of traffic needs to pass through the intersection at Hill Street, which is where the traffic problem occurs. The round-a-bout at Matakanana Road favours traffic approaching from Warworth, creating traffic ques back to state high one There is an excess requirement for pedestrians & cyclists - where are they coming from or going too?..& how many will there be?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Locate a link road to the south of Warkworth Or create an over bridge or tunnel at Hill street to allow better traffic flow Remove the roundabout on Matakana Road in preference to allowing traffic priority from the link road towards Matakana Reduce pedestrian / cycle way to a more appropriate width one side of road olny. Provide pedestrian crossings as required Omit over head lighting for something more appropriate & less offensive, reduce number of lights to service only required areas - separate lighting for pedestrian & cycle way not required
549 Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
550 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3237] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 2:45:37 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Anne Marie Fisher
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274942425
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 903,8 Hereford Street Freemans Bay Auckland 1011
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Timing of the construction
What are the reasons for your submission? The delays occasioned by the dreadful intersection at Warkworth are uneconomical for both private individuals and the business community
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? I desire that the Council approves the construction and commences construction as soon as possible
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
551 552 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3075] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 10:15:46 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Anne Waddington
Organisation name: N/a
Contact phone number: 0212689613
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 15 Ashmore Cres Warkworth Auckland 0910
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Requirement for 4 Lanes
What are the reasons for your submission? $90 million was approved around 6 years ago to build a 4 lane link road. Now $66 million for only a 2 lane road, which will have at least 2 intersections on it for the newly zoned industrial area and a 1000 section residential area. This will create another bottleneck, just like the Hill St intersection. The outlying areas of Warkworth, to the east in particular, are growing more rapidly than the actual Warkworth township and the residents of Warkworth are trapped in their own homes at peak times and cannot get out to the beaches without taking 1-2 hrs to get back eg weekends, school start and finish times, touch rugby evenings, and any events that are held in town or outlying areas. Families and friends, tourist buses will not visit as they are not guaranteed they will get back to Ak without delay because of the queues of traffic. A lot of people agreed to the Ak fuel tax as it was to be used for reading in this area.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Get quotes from local contractors to help with the planning and building of a 4 lane link road, without intersections on it. Look at the whole area, not just Warkworth central. 25,000 proposed
553 residents from 4500 is just around central Warkworth, not the wider district. The wider district traffic impacts Warkworth significantly.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
554 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3255] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:30:34 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: ANTHONY PAUL KORTEGAST
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021952062
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 6 Hiriri Ave, Remuera AUCKLAND 1050
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES, ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS, TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? I SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. THE LINK ROAD AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION ARE CRITICAL AND MUCH NEEDED ELEMENTS OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THIS RAPIDLY GROWING PART OF GREATER AUCKLAND AND ARE AN ESSENTIAL ADJUNCT TO THE CURRENT PUHOI-WARKWORTH MOTORWAY CONSTRUCTION.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? THE MLR SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED WITH 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELED. ACCESS TO THE NEW MOTORWAY AND ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIAL SITES SHOULD BE BY ROUNDABOUTS AND NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS, A FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS SHOULD BE ADOPTED TO ALLOW PROPER ASSESSMENT OF ALL COSTED OPTIONS, BUT IN ANY EVENT THE PURCHASE OF LAND SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 4 LANES & ASSOCIATED PATHWAYS.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
555 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
556 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3086] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 9:45:46 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Arlette Farland
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: +64275512131
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 142 Anderson Road RD5 Warkworth 0985
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Construction of the Matakana Link Road
What are the reasons for your submission? I live on Anderson Road, directly off Matakana Road not far from where the Matakana Link road will end.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? I would like the council to accept that a 2 lane road will not work and will not fix our traffic issues. It MUST be four lanes. With the development set to occur in this area, AT needs to redo it's modelling as it's based on pre-development modelling. It must take into account the growth and development around this road. I am seriously concerned that I will not be able to access the new motorway in a timely manner, due to this and the other issues with Hill Street I am already considering selling and moving away (really!). The link road is also a collector road. With lights and a roundabout in the design. This will slow traffic down. in addition, the fact that it costs $66 million to build a 1.4km road with 40% of this amount on contingency and risk is appalling. As a business owner if 40% of my money went on C&R I would be broke (and Auckland council practically is). AT should look at using 'Design Thinking' to question the existing system and make
557 it human-centered from this will come innovation.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
558 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3204] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:45:37 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Mark Ching
Organisation name: Armacup Maritime Services Ltd
Contact phone number: 021954982
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P.O Box 106-001 Auckland City Auckland 1143
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes vs 2 lanes Round abouts vs traffic lights Tendering Process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council/Auckland Transport seem to have changed their decision on the 4 lane costing of $89M which has already been signed off on despite the huge growth of Warkworth under the Unitary plan. This decision seems to be based on new unrealistic modelling.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled. Access to Motorway and new industrial sites by round abouts not traffic lights Flexible Tendering process to quote on all options but in all cases to purchase land for the 4 lanes and 2 pathways
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
559 Supporting information:
560 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3246] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 7:45:40 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Arnie Gielens
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021407744
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 66 Atkin Avenue Auckland Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: We need to have the total 4 lanes as per original plan with roundabouts. Not lights
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Only consider original 4 lanes with roundabouts not lights
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
561 562 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3215] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:45:33 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Joanne Marie Tisot
Organisation name: AZ & JM Tisot Ltd
Contact phone number: 0211587508
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 7 Meiklejohn Way Omaha Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: MATAKANA LINK ROAD - 4 lanes vs 2 lanes, roundabouts vs traffic lights & tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland council / Auckland transport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing of $89m already signed off on, based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the Unitary Plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled Access to motorway and new industrial sites by roundabouts not traffic lights. Flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes & pathways, 4 lanes no pathways, 2 lanes & pathways , 2 lanes and no pathways but in all cases purchase land for the 4 lanes & pathways. Estimate cost of retrofit and traffic chaos in short term if option one not chosen.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
563 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
564 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3214] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:30:50 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Zvonko Tisot
Organisation name: AZ & JM Tisot Ltd
Contact phone number: 0224227106
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 7 Meiklejohn Way Omaha Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes vs 2 lanes, roundabouts vs traffic lights & tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland council / Auckland transport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing of $89m already signed off on, based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the Unitary Plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled Access to motorway and new industrial sites by roundabouts not traffic lights. Flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes & pathways, 4 lanes no pathways, 2 lanes & pathways , 2 lanes and no pathways but in all cases purchase land for the 4 lanes & pathways. Estimate cost of retrofit and traffic chaos in short term if option one not chosen.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
565 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
566 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3299] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 4:00:43 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Barbara Gorton
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021743153
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P O Box 46173 Herne Bay Auckland 1011
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
567 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
568 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3242] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 4:30:46 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Ben Saunders
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0276227698
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 259081 Botany Auckland 2016
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes required for steady long term growth. Wide roundabouts for easy entry/exit traffic flow.
What are the reasons for your submission? 4 lanes longer term less expensive, less disruptive, permanent. 2 lanes to 4 lanes disruptive (again) and expensive "double-handling". The visitor traffic (tourism to Matakana / Omaha / Leigh) is higher than general growth, traffic surge needs to be addressed.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Keep to the 4 lane model. Be real. Access to m/way via wide entry / exit (think trucks), not traffic lights. Flexible tender process for contractors to quote Purchase land for decent 4 lane highway and pathways.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
569 Supporting information:
570 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3269] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 11:45:17 AM Attachments: RMA Submission re MLP.docx
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Bevan Woodward
Organisation name: BetterWorld NZ
Contact phone number: 0211226040
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: L1, 17 Elizabeth St Warkworth Auckland 0910
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: See attached
What are the reasons for your submission? See attached
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? See attached
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information: RMA Submission re MLP.docx
571 572
BetterWorld NZ Ltd L1, 17 Elizabeth St W a r k w o r t h 910
______
28 November 2018
Matakana Link Road Resource Consent Application:
I would like to make the following submission:
1. The application omits any reference to Auckland Council’s Greenways Plan for walking and cycling access (see page 26 of the Plan, endorsed by Rodney Local Board dated May 2017).
This needs to be rectified and the application must illustrate how its walking and cycling provision ties in with the Greenways Plan, including the A&P Showgrounds and the new suspension bridge linking the Showgrounds to Warkworth’s Kowhai Park (funding has been secured by the Rodney Local Board for its construction in 2019/20).
2. Concerns re: a. The large radius roundabout at intersection with Matakana Road will lead to high traffic speeds b. the Stage 1 pedestrian and cyclist crossings at the roundabout are low level of service c. lack of pedestrian and cycle path at extent of works on Matakana Road
3. Out of date info re PT services and lack of provision for public transport, eg: bus stops and shelters
4. Agree with AEE “the modelling is suggesting that four lanes are not required until between 2036 and 2046.” See further notes below.
5. Support the inclusion of planting to make the roading environment more attractive.
6. Disagree with AEE’s advise that “Overall, the Project has significant positive effects and its adverse effects will be adequately avoided, remedied or mitigated” as new roading projects invariably lead to an increase in traffic1 which creates additional greenhouse gas emissions, air, soil and water pollution.
1 Researchers refer to this phenomenon as “induced demand”: https://www.wired.com/2014/06/wuwt-traffic-induced-demand/
Transport Solutions for the 21st Century 573
Matakana Link Road: Why two lanes are sufficient:
1) Intersections are the main reason for congestion and delay, the width of the adjoining roads intersections is less critical.
2) OneWarkworth has overstated the demand for Matakana Link Road by: a. Claiming that Matakana Link Road will be the principal road used by Auckland and Northland traffic to access Snells Beach and Algies Bay. This is incorrect as such traffic will travel south to the Hill St intersection and turn left onto Sandspit Road. b. Ignoring the use of public transport and ride-sharing. c. Ignoring that the industrial zone also has access from Goatley Road (and will have future access to Clayden Road). It is not only accessed via Matakana Link Rd.
3) What vision do we have our region? Do we want to turn it into another car centric suburb of Auckland, like Albany? That’s what will happen if we build roads that are oversize and not in scale with the adjacent environment.
4) Long-term, traffic volumes will decline. Due to spatial constraints, environmental damage and social costs relating our high level of car dependency, we will use technology and pricing mechanisms to reduce traffic volumes: Autonomous vehicles will enable mobility to be delivered as a service. This will include ride-sharing and integration across the transport modes. We will move away from the current expectation of every adult having a vehicle. We will not have the space nor budget to expand the capacity of our roads to meet uncontrolled demand. Road pricing will be used to address congestion, users of ride- sharing will rewarded, and free car parking will be phased out.
Taking a holistic view, the only long-term solution to our transport challenges is to: Ensure all modes are optimised and integrated so that our high reliance on private motor vehicles is reduced Adopt technology and pricing mechanisms to encourage efficient, sustainable and healthy transport outcomes.
Prepared by:
Bevan Woodward Transport Planner B.Com PGCertEng (Transportation) E-mail: [email protected] Mobile 021-122 6040
Transport Solutions for the 21st Century 574 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3183] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:30:44 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Betty Anne Rutter
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021313480
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 46 Quebec Rd Milford Auckland 0620
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: WE SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. THE MLR, AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION, IS CRITICAL, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PUHOI TO WARKWORTH MOTORWAY, AND MUCH NEEDED. 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
575 Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
576 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3203] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:30:41 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Brett Chamberlain
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274950226
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 11a Norana Ave Remuera Auckland 1050
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: To build extension road, to get rid of issues with the bottle neck intersection at Hills rd.
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? To start and build all other link roads as in document labelled "AEE" with map picture labelled figure 3.4 please see Figure 3.4 – Transport Projects identified by the Balanced Response Programme Resource Consent Application & Assessment of Environmental Effects IZ072700- 0023-NP-RPT-0001
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
577 578 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3097] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Friday, 16 November 2018 8:45:41 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: BRIAN HOLMES
Organisation name: 1949
Contact phone number: +64274843100
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 20A RUBY COVE AUCKLAND AUCKLAND 0986
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Link road must be 4 lanes as originally proposed.
What are the reasons for your submission? Traffic on all these roads around and in and out of Warkworth is very heavy and getting much heavier by the day.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Keep to the original 4 lane road.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
579 580 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3270] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 12:00:13 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Bruce Neville Batty
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 09 4893659
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 15B Craig Rd Milford Auckland 0620
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the application. The MLR, and the timing of its completion is critical, together with the new Puhoi to Warkworth Motorway and much needed
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council / Auckland Transport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing $89M already signed off on, based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the Unitary Plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled Access to Motorway and new industrial sites by roundabout NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS Flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes and pathways, 4 lanes no pathways, 2 Lanes & pathways, 2 lanes & no pathways BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHARE LAND FOR THE 4 LANE & PATHWAYS. Estimate the cost of retrofit and traffic chaos in short term if option one not chosen
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
581 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
582 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3079] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 2:00:47 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Bruce Snowsill
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0279410254
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 43 Riverside Drive Point Wells RD6 Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Number of lanes, Cycle ways
What are the reasons for your submission? The proposal to reduce the number of lanes from 4 to 2 is short sighted and does not take into account present and projected growth in the greater area such as Matakana, snells beach, Point Wells, Omaha and Leigh. When it sinks in that 2 lanes was short sighted there will be major disruption widening the road to 4 lanes. Providing cycle ways is a waste of money. You can count on two hands the daily number of cyclists using the cycle way.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Build 4 lanes immediately. Scrub the cycle ways
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
583 Supporting information:
584 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3290] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 7:15:48 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Bryn Jamieson
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: +6494226294
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 208 Auckland Auckland 0947
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES V 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS V TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING $89 M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN .
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS. ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
585 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
586 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3264] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 10:30:12 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Campbell Bruce Jackson
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: +64211524248
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 10 Edmund St Auckland Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes vs 2 lanes Roundabout vs Traffic lights Tendering Process The four lane road and completion time is critical along with the completion of the motorway to Warkworth.
What are the reasons for your submission? The Auckland Council and Auckland Transport are using unrealistic modelling for the growth of the Warkworth area. Scaling back would be extremely short sighted.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct four lanes and the pathways as originally decided. Access to the motorway and industrial sites via roundabout, not traffic lights. Allow a flexible tender process to tender on the full four lanes and pathways, four lanes and not pathways, two lanes and pathways, two lanes. Land should be purchased to allow the full 4 lanes and pathways.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at
587 the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
588 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3293] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 10:30:41 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Carmel Paul
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021710162
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 14 Darroch Slope Omaha Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
589 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
590 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3196] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:16:35 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Charles Orrell Sklnner
Organisation name: Individual
Contact phone number: 09 6255924
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 189 Saint Andrews Rd Epsom Auckland 1022
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The timing of the commencement date Needs to be ASAP Need 4 lanes plus footpath Roundabouts neededcommence work S
What are the reasons for your submission? Current congestion Rapid growth of the matakana area
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? All of the above plus commencement date as per original plan
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
591 592 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3254] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:15:33 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Charlie Meade
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021488466
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 418 Remuera Rd Remuera Remuera 1050
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: WE SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. THE MLR, AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION, IS CRITICAL, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PUHOI TO WARKWORTH MOTORWAY, AND MUCH NEEDED. 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
593 Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
594 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3234] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 1:16:00 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Chris Allan
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021745337
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 9 Tuatua lane Omaha Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The MLR ,and th etiming of its completion is critical ,together withthe new Puhoi to Warkworth Motorway and much needed . 4 Lanes vs 2 lanes Roundabouts vs Traffic lights Tendering Process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council /Auckland Transport are changing their decision on th e4 lane costing of $89 m already signed off on ,based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of warkworth and surrounding areas under th eunitary plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
595 Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
596 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3213] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:15:48 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Chris Ryder
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021943418
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 47 Arthur St Ellerslie AUCKLAND 1051
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: WE SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. THE MLR, AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION, IS CRITICAL, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PUHOI TO WARKWORTH MOTORWAY, AND MUCH NEEDED.
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
597 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
598 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3198] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:17:07 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Colin Leuschke
Organisation name: Private
Contact phone number: 021 661661
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 221A Ponsonby Rd Freemans Bay Auckland 1011
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Construction of road
What are the reasons for your submission? Road is necessary
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Build the road
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
599 600 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3208] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:00:36 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Daniel McCarthy
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212412952
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 31 Tuna Llace Omaha AUCKLAND 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
601 Supporting information:
602 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3257] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 5:16:03 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: David Orchard
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 6254406
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 5A Buckley Road Auckland Auckland 1023
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes vs 2 lanes Roundabouts vs traffic lights
What are the reasons for your submission? I regularly travel this area and know that 2 lanes will not be enough to cope with the heavy traffic that frequents this area. All too often traffic lights do not allow the "free flow" of the traffic as the volume is often from one side of intersection and very little from another and thus the larger traffic volumes are held up by red lights when NO VEHICLES are using the green lights!
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Keep to their original submission
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
603 Supporting information:
604 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3197] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:16:37 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: David Price
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0272249700
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 15 Kitty Frazer Lane Omaha Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes v 2 lanes Roundabouts v traffic lights Tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council/Auckland Transport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing of $89m already signed off on. Based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the Unitary Paln.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled Access to motorway and new industrial sites by roundabouts not traffic lights Flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes & pathways, 4 lanes no pathways, 2 lanes and pathways, 2 lanes no pathways. But in all cases purchase land for 4 lanes & pathways Estimate cost of retrofit and traffic chaos in short term if 4 lanes with pathways not chosen
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
605 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
606 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3231] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 12:05:39 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Deborah Harrison-Flynn
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0210470234
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 16 Mangatawhiri Road Omaha Auckland 0926
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
607 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
608 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3249] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:30:36 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Debra Louise Bower
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021766274
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 3a Hope Street Grey Lynn Auckland 1022
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
609 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
610 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3229] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 12:02:17 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Denis Horner
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021949132
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P O Box 307, Matakana Auckland 0948
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: WE SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. THE MLR, AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION, IS CRITICAL, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PUHOI TO WARKWORTH MOTORWAY, AND MUCH NEEDED.
What are the reasons for your submission? 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN. I am a very keen cyclist, I live in the area and support cycle trails in general. However, what is included in the application is an over kill for cycling and is not required. Certainly not required as part of stage 1. I suggest a 1800 to 2000mm gravel cycle way between the rugby fields and the new link road. Not required to link with Matakana Road at this stage as it is too dangerous to cycle any where on the Matakana road as there is no shoulder.
611 Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
612 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3077] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 12:45:44 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Denise Crimp
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0272502435
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 502 Leigh Road Whangateau Auckland 0985
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: It should be a four lane road
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Make it a 4 lane road
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
613 614 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3207] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:00:43 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Diane Bennett
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021489415
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 2 O'Neill's Avenue Takapuna Auckland 0624
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
615 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
616 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3296] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 1:16:10 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Donal O'Sullivan
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021774475
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P.O.Box 302421, North Harbour Auckland 0751
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
617 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
618 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3194] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:16:16 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Donald Nixon
Organisation name: N/A
Contact phone number: 0275962703
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 135 Omaha Drive Omaha Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes v 2 lanes. Roundabouts v traffic lights
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
619 620 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3103] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 20 November 2018 2:16:06 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Elizabeth Corlett
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 094229569
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 77 Omaha Valley Rd Big Omaha Valley Auckland 0985
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The proposed reduction of a 4 lane link road to a 2 link road.
What are the reasons for your submission? The road will exacerbate existing traffic congestion in the area. Proposed intersections on the link road to service planned light industrial and new housing areas will result in traffic backing up to the new motorway off ramp. A two lane road will not work. Population projections are conservative and do not take into account growth in the Matakana area and beyond, Snells Beach or Algies Bay, the areas which are meant to be serviced by the planned link road. Modelling six years ago recommended a four lane road. Traffic pressure has exponentially increased since then. A two lane road does not represent value for money as it will not work.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Retain the four lane option. Investigate options for a flyover to avoid intersections. Examine traffic management options at the Matakana Rd end of the link road to reduce congestion there, otherwise there will still be traffic at a standstill at peak times eg weekends and holidays. Use local contractors to minimise costs and revisit the 40% contingency currently eating into the allocated budget. Revisit the 4 lane option to come up with a cheaper estimated cost plan, which
621 retains 4 lanes.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
622 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3250] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:45:36 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Elizabeth Jane Wnstone
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021539844
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 17 Esme Grove, R D 6 Omaha Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: That the MLR be restored to four lanes. Ideally the road should have no side roads accessing onto it. If it has to then roundabouts and no traffic lights. Allow local roading companies to tender.
What are the reasons for your submission? Congestion! The decision to reduce the number of lanes to two from four was made using floored modelling. The new industrial area alongside this new road will mean impeded traffic flow. Cycle tracks are not required for this stretch of road. There are other tracks and trails available. Cyclists cycle for recreation not commuting in this area.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct four lanes,not two. Allow for footpaths by purchasing the land required but do not build any initially. Take into account the populated areas of Snell's Beach, Matakana and Omaha in all your considerations. The modelling must be realistic.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
623 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
624 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3300] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 4:45:42 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Estelle Tant
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021992391
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 25601, St Heliers Auckland 1740
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
625 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
626 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3277] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 2:45:21 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Euan Glenn Beattie
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021798923
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 12 Kitirawa Road Remuera Auckland 1050
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
627 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
628 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3278] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 2:45:13 PM Attachments: Matakana Link Road Submission 18-11-2018.docx
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Roger Williams
Organisation name: Forest and Bird Warkworth Area
Contact phone number: 094259127
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 65 Alnwick St Warkworth Warkworth 0910
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Ecology of Stream F, Revegetation, Walkway/Cycleway
What are the reasons for your submission? To ensure that the project meets the requirements of the local community
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? See attached file
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information: Matakana Link Road Submission 18-11-2018.docx
629 630 Matakana Link Road - Notice of Requirement Submission by Forest and Bird Warkworth Area 18th November 2018
Prepared by Roger Williams, Committee member Forest and Bird, Warkworth Area 65 Alnwick Street, Warkworth 0910. Email [email protected]. If there is a hearing then we would like to be heard.
We support the Notice of Requirement provided that the following matters are adequately addressed.
The main stream, Stream F, that leads down to the Mahurangi River through QE2 land and the Kowhai Park from the MLR is one of the cleanest streams in the Rodney Area and deserves special measures to ensure that it remains that way. Measures Required are:- 1. A baseline water quality and baseline aquatic survey (this was not carried out in the AEE Appendix G Ecology Assessment despite us asking for it on our earlier submissions). 2. 3 monthly monitoring of water quality and also after high rainfall events. 3. Measures to protect the stream during construction. The plans provided with the NOR show 3 catchment ponds for detention and treatment of the final road surface runoff but none for the construction works. This is a critical omission because most of the earthworks filling for the project is near stream F and there is also a temporary bridge across the stream. The Catchment Ponds only protect the surface runoff from the final road surfaces and are all located at a much higher level than the works mentioned above. 4. Measures to prevent the establishment and spread of invasive weeds. 5. Measures to control animal pests. 6. There needs to be measures to prevent weeds being dumped in the vicinity of the bridge. It is suggested that both the bridge and its approach fills be no stopping areas marked with yellow lines. 7. The proposal to put both footpaths and cycleways on both sides of the road is both extravagant and inappropriate. Walkways and cycleways adjacent to a busy road are not pleasant places to use. A good example is the new cycleway/walkway between Hudson Road and Hill Street on State Highway 1 receives very little usage because of the heavy traffic adjacent to it. It is therefore suggested only a 1.5m wide Walkway be built on the south side of the MLR and that a 3m wide combined walkway cycleway be built through the A & P grounds, see plan. The land uses proposed south of the MLR are a pool complex and a school. These uses are complimentary to the A&P grounds. The proposed route through the A&P grounds provide good connectivity with the Park and Ride and the walkway and footbridge planned to go to Heritage Lane. There may still be a need for a combined walkway/cycleway on the north side but this could be reduced to 3.5m width. The cost savings of the earthworks on the MLR are significant. 8. Mitigation Planting for vegetation removed by the MLR can be located in the valley above and below the bridge site and an area of 3hA is available in the same catchment within the A&P grounds, see plan. It is recommended that a total of 5hA is planted as restorative planting for the 2hA lost.
631
632 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3224] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:30:35 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Gavin Hamilton
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021925888
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PoBox 333 Point Wells Point Wells 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The Link road should be a 4 lane to Matakana,
What are the reasons for your submission? Road is already busy and getting more so, particularly on weekends. 2 lane is short term thinking and sooner or later the road will need upgrading - do it once properly.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? above
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
633 634 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3222] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:00:41 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Gemma Wills
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0221080643
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 68A Tarawera Terrace St Heliers Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
635 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
636 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3285] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 8:15:10 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Gerard Crombie
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0272261549
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 9 Bannings Way Hobsonville Auckland 0618
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
637 Supporting information:
638 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3256] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:45:35 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Glen Hosking
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: +6421895969
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 30 The Terrace Herald Island Auckland 0168
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
639 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
640 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3099] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Saturday, 17 November 2018 9:30:49 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Glyn Evan Williams
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 9029333
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 186/31 Mansel Drive Warkworth Auckland 0910
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the full four laning of the MLR. However, I do not support the incorporation of costly and unnecessary "Rolls Royce" separated cycle and pedestrian lanes and planted medians.
What are the reasons for your submission? I am very concerned that the costly over-design of the MLR has forced a redesign to reduce costs. The simple, short sighted and uninformed "2-Lane" knee jerk response will lead not only to a "not fit for purpose" outcome but also lead to potentially disastrous delays in the construction and completion of the MLR the completion of which was promised to COINCIDE with that of the RoNS as justification of advancing the timing of the MLR construction ahead of the crucial Hill St intersection rebuild.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The council MUST be able to provide absolute surety that the MLR completion will COINCIDE with that of the RoNS. If not, it is CRUCIAL that a Traffic Management Plan reflecting the obvious and inevitable impacts on the Hill St intersection is given high priority. This process must involve "CAG-style" consultation with local groups eg One Warkworth, WALG, etc.
641 Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
642 Submission no 16
Form 21 Submission on requirement for designation that is subject to public notification or limited notification by a territorial authority Sections 168A, 169, 181, 189A, 190, and 195A, Resource Management Act 1991
To: Auckland Council
Name of submitter: Goatley Holdings Ltd
This is a submission on a notice of requirement from Auckland Transport for a designation for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road, Warkworth.
I am not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308B of the Resource Management Act 1991. The Requirement directly affects my property (refer Attachment A), for which I have jointly lodged (with Stellan Trust) an application for light industry subdivision.
The specific parts of the notice of requirement that my submission relates to are:
A. I support the Matakana Link Road in principle and generally along the proposed alignment, subject to the specific issues in B to D below.
As background, I originally proposed a Matakana link road across part of my property and other sites generally in a submission to the Auckland Unitary Plan in 20141 and sought that it be provided as an “indicative road”. This accompanied my submission seeking a Light Industry Zone (accepted by both the Independent Hearings Panel recommendation and the Auckland Council). At the time of the Submission Hearing neither Auckland Transport or NZTA had planned or adopted the concept of a link road that would help to address the “Hill Street” intersection problems.
Although my submission seeking that a Matakana Link road be defined as an indicative road in the Unitary Plan was not accepted by either the IHP or Auckland Council, AT initiated the MLR design and designation process not long after, and we have been engaged in frequent consultation with AT over the last three years, and have conveyed our preference for two intersections serving our industrial land on numerous occasions.
B. I oppose the proposed staging with two lanes to be constructed as stage 1, and four lanes as a later stage.
(a) Level of Service: Industrial Development
i). The entire road should be constructed as four lanes and not staged, or at the very least, constructed to four lanes to the second intersection from SH1 accessing the light industry development as illustrated in the attached marked up subdivision scheme plan ‐ jointly lodged by Goatley Holdings and Stellan Trust for consent (Attachment B)2.
1 http://www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/UPSubs/UPASEP007025.pdf 2 This application was lodged on 18 September 2018, prior to notification of the Requirement (1 November 2018). Goatley Holdings (along with Stellan Trust) has also advised Auckland Transport (and NZTA) of its plans for two intersections with the MLR during consultation between the parties since 2017, and formally on 21 June 2018 when a copy of the draft scheme for our land was provided (Attachment C).
643 Submission no 16
ii). I consider that two lanes will not adequately cope with the traffic accessing the Link Road with the development of more than 60ha of Light Industry zoned land, most of which is owned by Goatley Holdings, and likely to be subdivided and developed on a staged basis over the next 5‐10 years. iii). The prospect of heavy trucks entering and exiting the industrial area, inter‐mixed with other vehicular traffic accessing or transiting this area with other origins and destinations will clearly create potential congestion with only two lanes. iv). At the very least, the Link Road should be four‐lane to the second intersection to enable efficient and safe separation of traffic and turning movements into or out of the industrial area, and traffic transiting the area. v). The road should be surfaced with hot‐mix to limit noise and maximise ride quality (or similarly performing surface).
(b) Level of Service: Warkworth‐Wide Integrated Roading Network i). A two lane MLR will not efficiently accommodate the urban growth and general rural and urban activities that will occur east of Warkworth within the next 5 to 10 years, partly stimulated by the motorway terminating at Warkworth in 2021. ii). The proposal to only four‐lane the MLR in the mid‐2030s applies an arbitrary and undesirable planning constraint on the early contribution that the wider northern and north‐eastern FUZ can make to Warkworth’s industrial and residential land supply. This contribution is not properly addressed in the analysis undertaken by AT in the supporting NoR documents. iii). The reliance on Auckland Council growth modelling undertaken for the FULSS is flawed to the extent that this growth modelling does not appear to have properly assessed the infrastructure provision costs and constraints of the alternative and currently preferred identified growth areas (e.g. Warkworth South). It has also not undertaken a wider cost / benefit analysis of four‐laning the MLR, and a Matakana to Sandspit Roads link, in tandem with the earlier urbanisation of the north‐eastern FUZ (i.e. from 2021). iv). AT shares the responsibility to enable the achievement of the Auckland and Unitary Plan’s objectives for accommodating Warkworth’s growth as part of Auckland’s overall urban land supply provision. In this regard, two‐laning the MLR to save a relatively minor additional construction cost, when the overall AT roading costs for the alternative and currently advanced southern and western FUZ sectors have not been determined (or are not explained in the supporting documentation for the MLR) is highly questionable. At the very least, a more comprehensive roading cost and funding analysis should be provided to support the NoR staging proposals (and by implication, the FULSS preferences). v). Regarding funding options, Council / AT roading development contributions would already enable a significant contribution towards the cost of two additional lanes on the MLR and the construction of a Matakana Road to Sandspit Road link. These contributions can also be
644 Submission no 16
reviewed and increased if warranted, or alternatively, a Government Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) established as has recently been developed for the Wainui area.
C. I oppose stormwater management that (i) proposes a stormwater pond on our property and (ii) directs and / or diverts stormwater from separate catchments (e.g. the southern side of the Link Road route to the northern side including other land to the south not to be acquired by Auckland Transport, but which will or may be developed for urban or other purposes) to or through my property.
There are alternative stormwater management locations and options that have not been thoroughly investigated. Work has only been recently carried out jointly to explore further site options, at my encouragement. Where the ponds are currently proposed is unacceptable, being on a prime commercial corner site, and is of the utmost interest to potential businesses looking to locate there. This land has been held over a long period of time by Goatley Holdings, and over the past two years consultation with AT, my plans for development have been conveyed very clearly. I do not agree to put a stormwater pond on what will be one of the busiest corners of the Matakana coast access points.
AT should examine more practical and cost‐efficient options, which also would save costs, noting that I have committed significant costs in engaging engineers to assess these options more thoroughly.
D. I oppose the absence of any provision in the Requirement for access and intersection design and construction to both the Light Industry zoned land to the north‐west or to the Warkworth Showgrounds to the south‐east. These are both significant land uses for which proper access design and provision should be made as part of the proposed work. Provision for adjoining development should also include (or not preclude) civil infrastructure such as water, wastewater, stormwater, and internet/telecoms being made available for adjoining development.
1. I seek the following recommendation or decision from the territorial authority:
A. That the Matakana Link Road designation be confirmed, subject to the matters identified in B to D below.
B. That the Link Road be constructed to four lanes (not staged) over its full length; or at least from SH1 to the second intersection with our proposed light industry subdivision (refer Attachment B), and the road should be surfaced with hot‐mix (or similarly preforming surface).
C. That (i) a stormwater pond not be located on our property, and (ii) stormwater from other catchments be managed and retained within their local catchment and not directed to the catchment our property is in.
D. That provision should be made for access and intersection design and construction to both the Light Industry zoned land to the north‐west and to the Warkworth Showgrounds to the south‐east, and should also include (or not preclude) civil infrastructure such as water, wastewater, stormwater, and internet/telecoms being made available for adjoining development.
645 Submission no 16
I wish to be heard in support of my submission.
If others make a similar submission, I will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing.
Signature of submitter (or person authorised to sign on behalf of submitter) Date: 28 November 2018 Electronic Address for service: Goatley Holdings Ltd: c/‐ Terra Nova Planning Ltd: [email protected]. Telephone: 09 426 7007 Postal address: Terra Nova Planning Ltd; PO Box 466; Orewa Contact person: Shane Hartley (Director; Terra Nova Planning Ltd): [email protected]
Note to submitter If your submission relates to a notice of requirement for a designation or an alteration to a designation, and you are a trade competitor of the requiring authority, you may make a submission only if you are directly affected by an effect of the activity to which the requirement relates that— (a) adversely affects the environment; and (b) does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
You must serve a copy of your submission on the person who gave the notice of requirement as soon as reasonably practicable after you have served your submission on the territorial authority (unless the territorial authority itself gave the notice of requirement). Please note that your submission (or part of your submission) may be struck out if the authority is satisfied that at least 1 of the following applies to the submission (or part of the submission): it is frivolous or vexatious: it discloses no reasonable or relevant case: it would be an abuse of the hearing process to allow the submission (or the part) to be taken further: it contains offensive language: it is supported only by material that purports to be independent expert evidence but has been prepared by a person who is not independent or who does not have sufficient specialised knowledge or skill to give expert advice on the matter.
Schedule 1 form 21 heading: amended, on 1 November 2010, by regulation 19(1) of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Amendment Regulations 2010 (SR 2010/279). Schedule 1 form 21: amended, on 18 October 2017, by regulation 15(1) of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Amendment Regulations 2017 (LI 2017/231). Schedule 1 form 21: amended, on 3 March 2015, by regulation 11(1) of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Amendment Regulations 2014 (LI 2014/386). Schedule 1 form 21: amended, on 3 March 2015, by regulation 11(2) of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Amendment Regulations 2014 (LI 2014/386). Schedule 1 form 21: amended, on 1 November 2010, by regulation 19(1) of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Amendment Regulations 2010 (SR 2010/279). Schedule 1 form 21: amended, on 1 June 2006, by regulation 10(2) of the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Amendment Regulations 2006 (SR 2006/99).
646 Submission no 16
ATTACHMENT A
GOATLEY HOLDINGS LTD PROPERTY AND NOR
647 648 Submission no 16
Lot 2 DP 155679 2 2 2 Land Requirement Area (m ) Proposed Easement Area (m ) Temporary Occupation for contractors (during construction)(m ) ¯ 7223 448 1517
7m
Lot 2 DP 155679
12m
68m
NOTE 190m 1. These land plans are related to the Indicative Plus Option associated with Matakana link road. These are to facilitate discussion between Auckland Transport and local landowners. These do not fulfil the requirements of the Public Works Act.
2. All property boundaries are indicative only and are subject to survey
3. Subject to Matakana Link Road project works for Auckland Transport and inclusion for NX2 project works for New Zealand Transport Agency. Required split between both to be confirmed.
Land Requirement Area
SH 1 Temporary Occupation for contractors (during construction)
Proposed Easement
0 50 100 150 200 Meters
CLIENT AUCKLAND TRANSPORT PROJECT Property Impact Plan MATAKANA LINK ROAD MATAKANA LINK ROAD SPATIAL SCALE PROJECT CODE Carlaw Park 1:1,500 @ A3 IZ080100 12-16 Nicholls Lane PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN Parnell, Auckland MA NR Tel +64 9 928 5500 PROJECT DIRECTOR DATE Lot 2 DP 155679 Fax +64 9 928 5501 \\Jacobs.com\ANZ\IE\Projects\02_New Zealand\IZ080100\01 Design\SPATIAL\MXD\A3_Land_take_plan_opA3_20181008_mapseries.mxdTT 8/10/2018 649 Submission no 16
Lot 3 DP 155679 2 2 2 Land Requirement Area (m ) Proposed Easement Area (m ) Temporary Occupation for contractors (during construction)(m ) ¯ 3678 1357 836
12m
Lot 3 DP 155679
175m
NOTE 1. These land plans are related to the Indicative Plus Option associated with Matakana link road. These are to facilitate discussion between Auckland Transport and local landowners.
337m These do not fulfil the requirements of the Public Works Act.
2. All property boundaries are indicative only and are subject to survey
3. Subject to Matakana Link Road project works for Auckland Transport and inclusion for NX2 project works for New Zealand Transport Agency. Required split between both to be confirmed.
Land Requirement Area
Temporary Occupation for contractors (during construction) SH 1
Proposed Easement
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Meters
CLIENT AUCKLAND TRANSPORT PROJECT Property Impact Plan MATAKANA LINK ROAD MATAKANA LINK ROAD SPATIAL SCALE PROJECT CODE Carlaw Park 1:2,500 @ A3 IZ080100 12-16 Nicholls Lane PROJECT MANAGER DRAWN Parnell, Auckland MA NR Tel +64 9 928 5500 PROJECT DIRECTOR DATE Lot 3 DP 155679 Fax +64 9 928 5501 \\Jacobs.com\ANZ\IE\Projects\02_New Zealand\IZ080100\01 Design\SPATIAL\MXD\A3_Land_take_plan_opA3_20181008_mapseries.mxdTT 8/10/2018 650 Submission no 16
ATTACHMENT B
STELLAN TRUST / GOATLEY HOLDINGS SUBDIVISION SCHEME PLAN LODGED FOR CONSENT WITH MINIMUM EXTENT OF FOUR-LANING SOUGHT
651 652 Lot 1 Submission no 16 Lot 3 DP 400133 Lot 2 DP 38104 2 DP 204148 Part Allot 97 3 1 PSH of Mahurangi 7 Lot 1 4 DP 73280 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 8 36 37 5 Z 35 Goatley Road 9 18 38 Legal Road Unformed 6 11 17 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 40 23 Y 24 39 10 12 16 22 94 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 21 25 81 34 13 20 26 33 Road to Vest in Auckland80 Council 41 19 27 32 43 93 79 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 14 31 78 28 30 92 44 X 77 15 42 71 29 45 91 76 46 72 47 75 67 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 48 73 66 49 Part Lot 1 90 50 DP 61693 74 59 W 68 65 58 State Highway 891 60 Road to Vest 70in Auckland Council 64 57 52 69 61 51 Notes: 88 63 56 V Minimum extent of - Areas and dimensions are approximate only 62 and are subject to survey. 87 55 54 four laning sought - Zone: Road to Vest in Auckland Council 53 Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part 86 U - Business Light Industry 85 Lot 1 - This plan is for Resource Consent Purposes DP 135480 only. 84 Warkworth Showgrounds - This plan is subject to geotechnical, planning, engineering, ecological, urban design, 83 82 landscape, traffic analysis & design - Areas T-Z are to be subject to land covenants (riparian planting protection) - Existing ROW easements created by
Proposed Matakana Link Road C957090.5 are to be cancelled at the T relevant stage
Scale 1:4000 Lot 1 40 0 40 80 120 160 200 OVERALL SCHEME PLAN DP 119681 Applicant: Scale: Proposed Subdivision of Lots 1-3 SUB60325728, 1:4000 (A3) Goatley Holdings Lot 3 DP 61693, Lots 1-3 DP 155679, Part Allot 95 Job: Date: Drawn: Reviewed: 8116 14/09/18 DC DC Part Allot 57 PSH Mahurangi Drawing: Rev: Sheet: 16 Mill Lane, P.O.Box 107, Warkworth 0941, 09 425 8950 This document is the property of Buckton Consulting Surveyors Ltd., Address: www.buckton.co.nz, [email protected] and is not to be reproduced without their written authority. Goatley Road & State Highway 1, Warkworth SP 02 - 6531 of 6 654 Submission no 16
ATTACHMENT C
21 JUNE ADVICE RE SCHEME TO AUCKLAND TRANSPORT
655 Submission no 16
TNP Ref: 1261-0618 21 June 2018
Auckland Transport Private Bag 92250 Auckland 1142 Attention: Diana Bell
PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN; WARKWORTH - GOATLEY HOLDINGS AND STELLAN TRUST
Dear Diana
We attach an advanced subdivision concept plan for the development of the Light industrial Zone subdivision at SH1 / Goatley Road, Warkworth which has been developed over the past 12 months.
This has required consideration and provision for several interrelated environmental, market demand, geotechnical, civil infrastructure, roading and related development matters.
Our clients see this plan as informing the basis for current and future discussions and processes regarding State Highway and arterial roading proposals, among other matters. In this regard it is further to our letter to you dated 23 February 2018.
We would be happy to meet you to further discuss this at an opportune time, or as part of related discussions concerning the Link Road.
It is our intention also to hold a pre-application meeting with the Auckland Council soon.
Yours sincerely
Shane Hartley Director
Director: PO Box 466, Orewa 0946 Ph 09 426 7007 Shane Hartley BA BTP Florence House Fax 09 426 7001 16 Florence Ave Email [email protected] Orewa 0931 Web www.tnp.co.nz 656 Lot 1 Submission no 16 Lot 3 DP 400133 Lot 2 DP 38104 2 DP 204148 Part Allot 97 3 1 PSH of Mahurangi 7 Lot 1 4 DP 73280 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 8 36 37 5 Z 35 Goatley Road 9 18 38 Legal Road Unformed 6 11 17 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 40 23 Y 24 39 10 12 16 22 94 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 21 25 81 34 13 20 26 33 Road to Vest in Auckland80 Council 41 19 27 32 43 93 79 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 14 31 78 28 30 92 44 X 77 15 42 71 29 45 91 76 46 72 47 75 67 Road to Vest in Auckland Council 48 73 66 49 Part Lot 1 90 50 DP 61693 74 59 W 68 65 58 State Highway 891 60 Road to Vest 70in Auckland Council 64 57 52 69 61 51 Notes: 88 63 56 V - Areas and dimensions are approximate only 62 and are subject to survey. 87 55 54 - Zone: Road to Vest in Auckland Council 53 Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in Part 86 U - Business Light Industry 85 Lot 1 - This plan is for Resource Consent Purposes DP 135480 only. 84 Warkworth Showgrounds - This plan is subject to geotechnical, planning, engineering, ecological, urban design, 83 82 landscape, traffic analysis & design - Areas T-Z are to be subject to land covenants (riparian planting protection) - Existing ROW easements created by
Proposed Matakana Link Road C957090.5 are to be cancelled at the T relevant stage
Scale 1:4000 Lot 1 40 0 40 80 120 160 200 OVERALL SCHEME PLAN DP 119681 Applicant: Scale: Proposed Subdivision of Lots 1-3 SUB60325728, 1:4000 (A3) Goatley Holdings Lot 3 DP 61693, Lots 1-3 DP 155679, Part Allot 95 Job: Date: Drawn: Reviewed: 8116 14/09/18 DC DC Part Allot 57 PSH Mahurangi Drawing: Rev: Sheet: 16 Mill Lane, P.O.Box 107, Warkworth 0941, 09 425 8950 This document is the property of Buckton Consulting Surveyors Ltd., Address: www.buckton.co.nz, [email protected] and is not to be reproduced without their written authority. Goatley Road & State Highway 1, Warkworth SP 02 - 6571 of 6 658 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3280] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 4:00:16 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Graeme Ross Pinfold
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021358001
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 41 Allum St Kohimarama Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 Lanes v 2 Roundabouts Tendering
What are the reasons for your submission? This project and its timing is critical to alleviate a significant existing travel problem and to cater for the future of the new Puhoi motorway extension to Warkworth. It is consistent with the broader plans for the region including the significant planned expansion of Warkworth under the Unitary plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct the 4 lane and pathway as originally proposed - any less than this will compromise the benefits originally determined and is shortsighted Access to motorway and industrial area by roundabout to ensure free flowing traffic movement. Flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes and paths/2 lanes and paths but in all cases purchase land to allow 4 lanes and paths to ensure future proofing. Costs of retrofit v present should be assessed along the the impacts if only 2 lanes built.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
659 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
660 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3184] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:45:33 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Grant Shaw
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021 933095
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 58 Pah Road Epsom Auckland 1023
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Im sick of the horrific traffic going from Matakana to Warkworth so this link is vital. 2 hour trips for what should be a 15min leg is just wrong
What are the reasons for your submission? Please make this happen. Its a lot different to what it used to be even 5 years ago with huge amounts of traffic heading to this beautiful; part of the world. We are sick of the back log in traffic getting from Matakana to Warkworth, not only on long weekend in summer but almost every time of the year now.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? None
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
661 Supporting information:
662 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3262] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 9:30:21 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Heather Robinson
Organisation name: NA
Contact phone number: 0211038223
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 6 Niccol Avenue Narrow Neck Auckland 0624
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 Lanes rather than 2 Lanes Roundabouts rather than Traffic Lights Tendering Process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council/Auckland transport originally signed off for 4 lanes and pathways at $89M or better. Now they have used new modelling which doesn’t take account of the full growth potential of Warkworth’s expansion under the Unitary Plan, including the 90 unit industrial estate alongside the MLR requiring access.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct MLR with 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled. Construct access to State Highway 1 and new Industrial sites with roundabouts not traffic lights. Council to purchase land for provision of 4 lanes and pathways. Have a flexible tendering process for contractors to quote on options of 4 lanes and pathways, 4 lanes without pathways, 2 lanes and pathway, 2 lanes without pathway.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
663 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
664 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3078] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 1:31:00 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Helen Slater
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0272221985
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 110 Percy St Warkworth Warkworth 0910
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Number of lanes
What are the reasons for your submission? We need to future-proof Warkworth and ensure our roads are adequate for the long- term, avoiding the issues metropolitan Auckland faces now through lack of forward planning.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The Matakana Link Rd needs to be four lanes in its entirety. To four lane in parts will create dangerous bottlenecks. To two-lane only will see it rapidly clogged.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
665 666 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3170] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Monday, 26 November 2018 10:45:46 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Ines Curin
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021866659
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 295 Point Wells Road Warkworth Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES V 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS V TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING $89 M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN .
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS. ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
667 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
668 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3258] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 7:15:24 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: James Dryden
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021982745
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 23 Ida Way Omaha Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
669 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
670 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3068] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 8 November 2018 2:15:19 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: James Howard Fletcher
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 6494227161
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 2 Green Road Matakana Warkworth 0985
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The reduction of the proposed road from 4 lanes to two
What are the reasons for your submission? As a local resident, I am concerned that the road as proposed will be inadequate for purpose.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Reinstate the original design that called for two lanes each way.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
671 672 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3189] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:45:39 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: JAMES MITCHELL
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274736820
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 2/18 Tuhaere Street Orakei Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
673 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
674 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3080] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 6:00:44 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Jason Morrison
Organisation name: Jason Morrison Funeral Services
Contact phone number: 0272266866
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P O Box 652 Warkworth Auckland 0941
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The Matakana Link Road needs to be FOUR LANES from the outset. I would favour seeing 4 lanes constructed first then add footpaths and cycle ways at a later date.
What are the reasons for your submission? Due to expected development, the MLR will very quickly become a collector road and as such the necessary intersections should be part of the initial design and construction so as not to create further congestion of SH1 (both the new motorway, and the existing Hill Street intersection).
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Make the MLR a FOUR LANE road from the outset. Enter into Early Contractor Engagement to assist in keeping costs down to an affordable level.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at
675 the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
676 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3104] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 20 November 2018 2:46:02 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Jennifer and Phil Francis
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 094230094
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P O Box 89 Matakana Auckland Auckland 0948
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I am submitting of the reduction of the planned route from four lanes to two.
What are the reasons for your submission? 1) It is extremely short sighted to reduce the number of lanes. It is easier to add the cycle lanes and footpaths later, but more difficult to add extra lanes. 2) Not enough attention has been paid to the huge increase in population that will occur and is occurring in the warkworth and surrounds. 3) It has gone past being a link road, and already plans are being developed for a light industrial and residential subdivision right beside the road, necessitating intersections and roundabouts.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Build a 4 lane road, plan for developers to complete the cycle paths and footpaths as part of their resource consents.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at
677 the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
678 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3199] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:16:47 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Jeremy Scott
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021662182
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 109 Churchill road. Murrays Bay Auckland 0630
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
679 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
680 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3069] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Friday, 9 November 2018 2:00:10 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Jo Haswell
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274306822
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 7 Lysnar Road, RD5 Warkworth Auckland 0985
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The number of lanes proposed for the link road
What are the reasons for your submission? The decision to reduce the link road to two lanes, which is not providing for the fast growth in the area and the frustration and inconvenience that traffic snarl ups have on the area.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? That the Matakana Link Road should be four lanes
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
681 682 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3209] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:01:01 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Joan Ashworth
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 095756679
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 50 The Parade Auckland Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The urgency to get this work underway in conjunction with development of SH1 motorway to Warkworth... a growing area
What are the reasons for your submission? Concern that changes and development in this area do not result in another "Hill Street" type traffic congestion problem
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? There needs to be a four lane road in this busy area.....it is shortsighted to think of only 2 lanes Roundabouts are preferred to traffic lights...allows traffic to move according to demand.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
683 Supporting information:
684 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3272] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 12:15:13 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Joanne Barker
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021 776 006
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 82 013 Highland Park Auckland 2143
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
685 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
686 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3180] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Monday, 26 November 2018 8:00:45 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Johannes Slabbert
Organisation name: Retired
Contact phone number: 0212606721
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 20 Christopher Lane, Woodcocks Woodcocks Warkworth 0910
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the principle of the link road but I would like to urge the Council to return to the original proposal of 4 lanes and pathways, together with the preferred method of traffic control, namely traffic circles instead of traffic lights, as lights would only slow down the traffic flow
What are the reasons for your submission? New Zealand ( and Councils and governments all over the world ) have a history of deferring needed and practical infrastructure and replacing it with cheaper options, only to regret the short- sighted money-saving decisions when public demand exposes the earlier poor option. Just look at New Zealand's prime example of the Auckland Harbour Bridge, where earlier bad decisions to save money have forced expensive additions as the demand for services rose. increased. Please do not fall into the fatal trap of saving money now and diverting some of the funds to another scheme. The future huge increase of Warkworth's population MUST be taken into account now, especially as this growth is forms part of the Auckland Unitary Plan. Why ignore your own forecasts and planning?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? I would respectfully urge a mental switch from a later, less practical plan that is contrary not only
687 to common sense but also to the wishes of the majority of your ratepayers that are affected by your changing the goalposts.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
688 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3218] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:45:39 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: John Alfred Cowan
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021469000
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 5/16 Atkin Avenue Mission Bay Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS, 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
689 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
690 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3195] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:16:25 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: John Linton
Organisation name: N/A
Contact phone number: 0272445728
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 5 Karahu Lane Omaha Beach, Warkworth Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
691 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
692 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3221] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:00:40 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: John Robert Chetwynd
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274975168
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 170 Mangatawhiri Road Omaha Omaha 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: This is an important link to Matakana so it has my full support
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Support the application
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
693 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3251] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:00:49 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: John Stuart Taylor
Organisation name: NA
Contact phone number: 021 248 6199
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 7b Kenneth Small Place Remuera Auckland 1050
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the proposed new road from SH1 to Matakana Road
What are the reasons for your submission? We have a holiday home at Omaha, and I have spent hours in traffic trying to get out of Matakana at the current complex intersection at the north end of the Warkworth Township
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? To decide to purchase any land necessary to build the proposed new
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
694 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3072] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 9:45:43 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Julie
Organisation name: Barclay
Contact phone number: 0212349834
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 6 Davie Martin Road RD 1 Warkworth Auckland 0981
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Number of lanes
What are the reasons for your submission? Once the Puhoi to WW Motorway is completed traffic volumes will surely increase along with housing development. Surely building 4 lanes in the beginning is cheaper and less disruptive.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? To make the road 4 lanes instead of 2.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
695 696 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3301] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 5:00:54 PM Attachments: SUBMISSION WLT.pdf Council Consent 125 Matakana Rd.pdf
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: karen pegrume ON BEHALF OF the WHITE LIGHT FAMILY
Organisation name: Better Living Landscapes Ltd
Contact phone number:
Email address:
Postal address:
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: see attached submisson
What are the reasons for your submission? see attached submission
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? see attached submisson
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
697 SUBMISSION WLT.pdf Council Consent 125 Matakana Rd.pdf
698 Submission for the White Light Family Trust Project: Matakana Link Road Referenced by Auckland Council as:
For the: White Light Family Trust who own the property known as 245 Matakana Road LOT 1 DP 101758 and wish to be heard at the hearing. Contact: Planning Agent Karen Pegrume Better Living Landscapes Ltd
699
1 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Introduction
The white Light Family Trust are accepting of the need for the Matakana Link Road to enable the projected development of Warkworth as a satellite town, and the need for a clean connection from the motorway with dispersal out to the outlying towns of Matakana, the beaches, Snells Beach, Sandspit and Algies Bay as well as Warkworth. The White Light Family Trust are accepting that their property, that has been in the family for 4 generations is part of “changing times” with the road dissecting their family land into two portions of land with the Matakana Link Road and the bridge taking a significant portion of land and severely compromising future use of this land.
What they are not accepting of is being unnecessarily compromised in the future use of this land, with severe access limitations, loss of amenity values of what is identified as bush meeting the Significant Ecological Factors as set out in the Unitary Plan, and other amenity values that will be degraded more than may well be required or can be adequately mitigated but such mitigation has not been offered.
The land (245 Matakana Road) has been zoned “Future Urban” in the Unitary Plan. The FLSS has this land as “first off the blocks” coinciding with the construction completion of the Motorway Extension, and the Matakana Link Road. Water Care are advancing the Algies Bay Wastewater plant upgrade and have installed a unique interim solution at the Warkworth Wastewater Plant in the interim to cater for the current development occurring in Warkworth on the “live zoned” land in the Unitary Plan. Warkworth is not standing still, 700
2 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
land as fast as it became Live Zoned has come on line and is being development. Much of the Future Urban zoned land along the proposed corridor has been purchased by developers that are ready to develop.
It is noted that the FLSS strategy is not part of the Unitary Plan but is a non-statutory document, however the point here is that currently there is no impediments - (in particular access) to developing 245 Matakana Road once the Motorway is completed along with the Matakana Link Road. It is situated close to Warkworth Town Centre and ideally placed for high density types of living. (meeting the compact urban form) and this type of zoning is accepted as likely by various expert reports supplied with the NoR.
Auckland Transport (AT) (as part of Auckland Council) have the responsibility of providing a roading network to enable the development of Warkworth. Auckland Transport are not there to dictate or restrict the development potential.
Auckland Council have chosen to lead the Structure Planning Process for Warkworth but have since put this on hold whilst they wait for AT to provide an updated transport strategy. This, whilst an indirect issue, is relevant to how the Matakana Link Road development is being staged as AT are supposed to be enabling development. ATs Transport strategy should be following the structure plan process or be in tandem - but not before.
These points are important as the process of HOW AT proposed to manage the project in 2 full stages now- and in 25 years will have important negative/ adverse effects on this land, for access and other amenity matters.
701
3 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
As Future Urban Land for the next 5 years at the most this land still has a variety of optional uses as Restricted Discretionary or Discretionary Activities that would generate traffic movements on and off the “site” greater than as a family property with a home occupation operating from it.
AT have made it clear that 245 will NOT have access to the Matakana Link Road. This block of land that will be severed in half will require Road Access (not just a driveway) to Matakana Road and will become reliant on Clayden Road and its access for the severed northern portion. Therefore the design of the roundabout and the Clayden Road intersection is critical for the future intended use and also for the interim potential use of this land. As one of AT’s critical success factors with this project is to “enable access to/integration with the FUZ” - that it actually does the opposite for 245 is of great importance. (assuming AT are there to enable the future development as well as the existing potential uses and not disable those uses).
In terms of making a comprehensive submission the White Light Family Trust are still waiting for the new noise data that has been re-done due to incorrect positioning of the monitors. Without that information the White Light Trust are not in a position to have any reasoned commentary. But reserve that right in this submission.
It is also of concern that on the 22nd November the White Light Family Trust (via Trustee Deb Steel) received an email from AT that states as yet AT have not yet decided if the bridge is a single span bridge or a three span bridge. (email attached) There is a big difference between the two design outcomes in terms of the impact on the environment, its ecology and the amenity values left for the remaining land. It is not possible to make a valued 702 submission without that design route known. (see attachment) but reserve that right as part of the ongoing process.
4 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
The Plan this submission has attached to this report by Warkworth Surveyors Ltd is different to that in the NoR documents as this is the latest plan that has been sent to the White Light Trust in terms of the Land Take and the temporary Lease area. The Plan has drawn indicative stream locations and has contour information The underlying Arial Photography is ortho correct and recently flown with a surveyor’s drone. The underlying vegetation is as it currently exists. Some slope information has been laid onto the Plan.(based on accurate Survey data)
Attached also to this submission is information from HG Traffic input for the Trust.
Key points to the submission
703 The submission has a table that has created topics from which points are raised directly from all the reports submitted with the NoR.
5 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
1. Access:
Section/Pg Extract from Document Issue/s for 245/ submission point NoR 5. “Road access will be provided to a large area of FU and Light Industrial zoned land, therefore Not for 245 Matakana Road (245) this site is expressly allowing these sections of land to be developed. excluded from access rights. NoR “will facilitate the development of the future urban and Light Industrial … therefore Restrictions on development of FU land imposed on 245 Part C supporting growth” goes against Project obj#1 NoR 2.2 pg 9 This is particularly important given the greenfield location of the Project and the need to Not for 245 ensure adequate transport connections for future development. AT acknowledges the importance the Project will have in place making, given that it has a critical role in ‘Critical role’ yet is ignoring impacts of Clayden Rd establishing the pattern of future development and land uses within the surrounding area. NoR 3.3 Future intersections along the length of Matakana link road will be constructed by developers We’ve been told no intersections allowed MLR for 245. Pg 12 as the surrounding area is urbanised….. NoR 5.3.2 Road Layout “The design and location of these intersections will be determined once the Access – not the case for either clayden rd or southern development of the neighbouring sites is confirmed through either structure planning or access issues. Not true for 245. development proposals and will be constructed by developers. The number and location of these intersections will be determined following further modelling and engagement with ‘Safe’ functioning of Clayden rd traffic is obviously not developers to ensure the safe and efficient functioning of the corridor.” considered here as is only 70m from roundabout which does not comply with road safety standards. Both left and right-hand turns from Clayden Road will be maintained, with a merge lane on Matakana Road providing safe access for traffic coming from Clayden Road. NoR 6.2.2 Critical success factors for the project Clayden rd safety issue is ignored here & does not enable 7) Must enable access to/integration with the Future Urban Zone and the Light Industrial access to the FUZ at 245 Zone between SH1 and Matakana Rd…. The Project had to enable access to the FUZ
NoR 6.5 AT has evaluated a wide range of alternatives for addressing the transport needs for the This describes how Option A was preferred and forms the Pg 41 northern approaches to Warkworth and Matakana. That evaluation confirmed that the basis of this NoR application – yet they have chosen alleviating of future transport constraints between SH1 and the wider Warkworth township option B - The justification for this is appears minimal and area was best addressed through the preferred alignment (Option A). This alignment also is certainly not clear. avoided SEA’s and was unlikely to disturb historic heritage. The corridor provides for land The alignment does not avoid SEA- (refer to applicants development to both the north and south of the road corridor while also avoiding the loss of own report). The current layout of the Matakana Road the Warkworth Showground facilities, thereby supporting the development objectives of the Roundabout as proposed does not present for safe AUP-OP. It is also able to be safely connected to the existing road network and meet the access from the southern severance for a subdivision that future operational requirements of both the P2Wk and local road network. This is the corridor would likely have up to 100 Lots within it based on mixed 704 which is the basis of the NoR application. housing urban or 50 Lots based on single house zone
6 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
onto Matakana Road and the same applies for the northern severance in trying to come off Clayden Road. NoR 8.5.2 Road safety has also been a key consideration in the design process. The diversion of traffic Clayden Rd is 70m from intersection does not meet safety pg 53 from SH1 to the Project is expected to provide a midblock crash reduction benefit due to the requirements of the NZTA Planning Policy Manual. Yet safer design of the new road and reduction in network congestion. It is acknowledged that this will be a negative to developers up Clayden Rd. the distance at both the Clayden Road/Matakana Road and the Matakana link There is also no safe road access provided or proven for road/Matakana Road intersections do not meet the safety requirements of the New Zealand the southern land severance block that must come onto Transport Agency’s Planning Policy Manual as there is less than 200m between proposed Matakana Road. There is no response for the future and existing intersections. In response, a raised median strip and shoulder improvements are landuse of 245. proposed on Matakana Road to reduce the risk of unsafe vehicle movements to and from This last sentence implies immediate change to Clayden Clayden Road. Rd (re island etc) - this will not occur until 2036!. NoR 9.1 pg 63 Public consultation – response to submissions – chose their corridor (Look) Route selection - Justification of moving from As a response to these submissions, the project corridor now avoids the most significant option A? ecological features within the immediate area. In addition, the corridor is future proofed for Yet In ecological assessment said B & C scored more the construction of intersections along its length, thereby supporting urban development in negatively pg 33) the Project Corridor. NoR 10.7.2 Auckland Future Land Supply Strategy (FULSS) This property is not advantaged by the Link Road as it is The FULSS was adopted by AC in July 2017 and is a region wide strategic document expressly denied access to it and must come off detailing the location and timing for the release of new greenfield areas. It recognises the Matakana and Clayden Road and on application for importance of aligning infrastructure planning with growth management and identifies the subdivisionn will strike all manner of issues in meeting the Warkworth North area as being development ready by 2022. The Project is critical to access requirements within E27 Infrastructure Chapter delivering this greenfield capacity, given the improved accessibility it provides to sites along and the Transport design guidelines. its length. Without the Project, the opening up of these sites to greenfield development could be delayed and/or at lower development yields, thereby undermining the growth objectives of the FULSS and the wider sustainable urban development of Auckland. O&Policy In addition, the Project will improve transport connections to Future Urban zoned land, Access for 245 is not facilitated rather it is hindered by the Pg 2 facilitating the delivery of new development sites and supporting the planned growth of proposed alignment and roundabout configuration. Warkworth over the coming decades….. Without the provision of the proposed road corridor, the ability to develop these sites will be compromised. This will have adverse effects on both their development timeframes and yield which will undermine the urban form sought by the AUP-OP O&Policy The Project takes into consideration the adjacent land and zoning and has been designed in The precise opposite has occurred for 245. Pg 5 a manner that will ensure that the maximum development potential can be achieved along with ensuring the provision of sufficient access to any future development that may take place O&Policies (infrastructure) The Project will enable the general social and economic growth of Warkworth Restricts 245 not enables Pg 41 and also facilitate urban development in areas where such development is planned and zoned appropriately. The Project supports the outcomes sought by the Future Urban Zone. While no structure plan Restricts the existing use of 245 unless AT are happy to
705 O&Policies Pg 49 has been finalised for the Project area, it is critical that future transport links, such as this be running cattle up Matakana Road and onto Clayden Project, are planned for and protected. The Project will assist in the urbanisation of Northern
7 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Warkworth, improving access to both live zoned light industrial sites, as well as Future Urban road to get to the northern severance. (or across the link zoned land beside Matakana Road and SH1. The options assessment process which was road that has not provided access to this site. undertaken for the Project determined that the chosen option was the best for supporting Misses also that future Urban Land is NOT restricted to a urban development, providing for development to both the North and South of the corridor, pastoral use and includes uses that has high traffic while also linking to possible future connections to West Warkworth and Sandspit Road. counts, that this design has not catered for in terms of 245 Furthermore, the Project does not compromise the ability for the surrounding sites to in the interim period. continue to be used for rural land use activities prior to their urban development. The effects It is not even possible now for the owners of 245 to park of the Project are limited and are unlikely to prevent pastoral farming to continue. As such, their equipment and walk to their house as there is no the Project is also consistent with the objectives and policies of the underlying rural zone safe pedestrian access provided from the northern severance land across the Link Road and Roundabout. This design has made no consideration of getting from Clayden Road on foot safely to Warkworth without having to navigate running the link road or dodging cars on a roundabout. The design process seems to have shrugged off the issues that have been created for 245 The land owned by 245 will be unable to be farmed in any practical way now.
Transport Property Access: The Project is intended to provide access to FUZ sites and create a section Access to this site and its two severances with the link 4.4 pg 27 of an arterial road network which will enable access for the urban land development expected road going through the middle has NO certainty for 245 for in northern Warkworth. The road will provide certainty for developers on land accessibility. future development, and in fact when addressing the Transport Rules in E27 it will be almost impossible to be able to comply as an RD activity. Transport While the proposed road currently does not provide public transport facilities, any future Appendix e aspirations for public transport to use the Project before staging can be accommodated in the In AT’s own reports it is noted that development will be Proposed Stage 1 cross section. Once urban development along the corridor occurs bus stop locations occurring from 2022. network can be revisited, and appropriate locations identified. Someone is not aware that the development alongside improvements In Stage 2, after the population increases and development has begun adjacent to the this transport corridor is set to occur as the Link Road 4. Pg 34 Project, buses may be more viable in the corridor. In Stage 2, the cross section design is opens. ! ie within 5 years or less. wide enough to accommodate public transport infrastructure and turning radii are suitable for buses. 4.2 Matakana The project proposes a roundabout at the intersection of Matakana Road with the new MLR, How will this southern entrance work in 5 years time when Link Road/ which would be constructed in stages. The proposed single lane layout for Stage 1 is shown the land is developed for urban use? Matakana in Figure 4-5. Driveways will be reconstructed to maintain access from Matakana Road to AT need to be committed to enabling future development. Road 245 Matakana Road. This driveway may be cut off during construction but appropriate intersection access to the properties will be maintained through temporary accesses or other measures. Due to the proximity to the intersection, the main access to 245 Matakana Road may become “Left In Left Out” only. An alternative access will be provided at the southern end of the 706 section which will allow all movements in and out of the property. This access is shown in Figure 4-5 just south of the roundabout on the northbound side of Matakana Road.
8 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
2. Safety: NoR Have removed comment from v1 that re Clayden Rd ‘safe access’. We know a reason for staging was budget constraints and 3. Reasons for staging stated as due to modelling ‘to align with current traffic modelling”, this was publicly stated yet now “modelling is the driving factor, but the modelling information at the time of submission closure was not available”.
NoR 1.1 “While project design does not include intersections, it has been designed to appropriate Safety - Clayden Rd Issue – within 70m (accepted distance vertical and horizontal geometry to ensure adequate sightlines to safely accommodate new 200m) of the proposed new roundabout. 245 have been intersections along its length, therefore catering for the development of the surrounding sites” expressly denied access from the Link road, so are then reliant on Clayden and Matakana Road. The design has expressly not been developed with 245 in mind for safe urban development or even existing uses. NoR 5.3.2 Road Layout “The design and location of these intersections will be determined once the Access – not the case for either Clayden Road or southern development of the neighbouring sites is confirmed through either structure planning or access issues. Not true for 245. development proposals and will be constructed by developers. The number and location of these intersections will be determined following further modelling and engagement with ‘Safe’ functioning of Clayden rd traffic is obviously not developers to ensure the safe and efficient functioning of the corridor.” considered here as 70m from roundabout which does not comply and no safe ROAD access for future development Both left and right-hand turns from Clayden Road will be maintained, with a merge lane on of the southern severance. Obfiscating this to the developer Matakana Road providing safe access for traffic coming from Clayden Road. is not reasonable. AT need to demonstrate safe road access for both sides of 245. This last comment only relates to stage 2 - from 2036.. surely a cost benefit of fitting the upgrades in now is not onerous. NoR 6.2.2 Critical success factors for the project continued..
3) Route geometry must meet the appropriate design standards without significant departures Access - Clayden Rd, and other access issues for all of 245 as listed above NoR 6.2.2 Critical success factors for the project continued..
5)Safe intersections must be provided both along the new link and at either end of it. “Safe for Pedestrians – north to south at 245 does not seem to have all Users” been designed for. At the moment the only safe way to get over the road would be in a flight!
NoR 6.2.2 Critical success factors for the project continued.. Clayden Roadd safety issue is ignored here & does not 7) Must enable access to/integration with the Future Urban Zone and the Light Industrial Zone enable access to 245 FUZ land. Does not enable FUZ between SH1 and Matakana Rd…. The Project had to enable access to the FUZ access for southern portion of 245. 707 NoR 9.1 pg Public consultation – response to submissions – chose their corridor Route selection - Justification of moving from option A? 63 9 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
As a response to these submissions, the project corridor now avoids the most significant Yet A, B & D better for bush preservation? (In ecological ecological features within the immediate area. In addition, the corridor is future proofed for the assessment said B & C score more negatively pg 33) construction of intersections along its length, thereby supporting urban development in the Project Corridor. Transport The Clayden Road intersection is also expected to operate reasonably well with the tested How accurate actual flows vs demand flows – numbers Pg 44 amounts of traffic. The table below shows the LOS, delay, and queue length for the right turn used in modelling using FUZ land up Clayden rd? what from Clayden Road onto Matakana Road in the one-lane scenario for the 2036 PM peak. density of development has been assumed? Transport In the current design, there is only approximately 70m between the Clayden Road / Matakana Clayden rd safety seems to have been justified for the Pg 48 Road intersection and the Project/ Matakana Road intersection. According to the Transport purpose but if a developer was to present this it would be Agency’s Planning Policy Manual, it is typically recommended that two intersections have at likely to be objected to by AT, with significant upgrades least 200m between them. With shorter distance, there are a number of issues that can arise. required. Is there a guarantee that the land of 245 that will These issues have been addressed in the design, as described in Table 7.8. be dependent on Clayden Road will not at the time of development be hindered by the safety matters raised by The roundabout will slow vehicles entering and exiting the intersection, so the speed past the AT as input in a subdivision application lodged in the Clayden Road intersection will be slower than the current posted speed of 80 kph. It will be future. easier for vehicles turning out of Clayden Road to judge the Safety Concern Response gap distance. Any crashes that still occur would be less severe at a slower speed. A drainlaying business operates currently at this location,, with trucks and trailers turning right often - this is of concern that no proposed changes until stage 2.
Transport Operational and capacity issues with the increase in traffic that Clayden Road may be assumed Clayden Rd Safety .. how is its “assumed” in what levels Pg 49 to service with the development of the surrounding FUZ area. The original application was quite certain Clayden Road There is still a high level of uncertainty around the level of future development in this area. was an issue, yet now seems less certain yet there is no There is potential for the Clayden Road intersection to be improved in the future, in conjunction new information to develop this idea. with development. As part of the structure plan process that is underway by Auckland Council, the design and operation of the Clayden Road intersection may need to be considered. V1 “Clayden rd intersection will need to be considered” V2 changed to ‘may’ need to be considered.. our opinion is it must be considered.
3. Ecology:
708
10 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
NoR 4.3.1, The ecological assessment did not observe Kauri within the Project corridor, but there are many P 17 semi-mature and mature sized kauri elsewhere in the forest remnant adjacent to the proposed This is a new paragraph within the newer amended works area. application. See high Court Decision on SEA. “Immediately outside the Project corridor, at 245 Matakana Road, are fragments of (see attached) CIV 2016-404 2343 anthropogenic tōtara forest. These areas are dominated by tōtara and have open understorey It is an agreed error that irrespective of the planning due to the browsing of stock. Ongoing agricultural practices has resulted in a highly-modified outcome that SEA is not based on the planning maps but is ecosystem at this location. It is noted that these forest fragments are not subject to any based on the objective criteria. protection under the AUP-OP given their location outside any riparian margins. As future Urban Land such corridors are highly regarded and there would be an expectation of re-assessment of its values as part of any structure plan process..
It has also been omitted from the reports that this bush has been approved for covenanting and has a 223 Plan lodged. It would be a discretionary activity to apply to destroy this native bush. The entire area of bush as a total sequence including its attachment to the QEII bush to the south should not be dismissed.
– and looking at recent exploded drawing of road – this totara fragment is totally within the project corridor. The majority of the bush area has dense understory and has not been actively grazed , it is fenced!
NoR 4.3.3 “Assessed by Ecologist to have a high current ecological value due to high levels of Not happy about amount of mature bush and impact of Pg 18 shadowing, wide riparian margin and diverse aquatic habitat”. abutments with removal of 90m bridge option they are now App G – 2.3.1.3 – the effect of the loss would be high (WF11 is endangered) going to have to clear. (although it is still not clear why a single span option would be better than the 3 span option. A single Span option will require a lot more earthworks in the riparian forest. NoR 5.2.4 “However, during the detailed design phase, there may be opportunities to reduce the scale of Concerned about lack of information on bridge design now land disturbance and vegetation clearance within the riparian margins of Stream F. This may 11 months out and an email from AT suggesting that this is include the use of a different bridge design. Any design changes to the bridge structure will be not yet confirmed. It is of concern that bridge design simply documented and provided in the Stage 1 OPW.” falls into OPW as the effects of the bridge design on the environment will not have been adequately assessed. (Version 1 stated a 90m bridge would “limit vegetation clearance – ecological mitigation capture To just give the nod as an OPW would be somewhat and release of natural fauna and offsite mitigation planting”.) surprising as an approach to assessing effects. The effects between the design options now on the table are very different. 709 The Council are building a pedestrian bridge at considerable expense in this same stream catchment to
11 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
avoid damage to the forest and riparian margins rather then a culvert and abuttment type design, so why is it ok here? The large abutments required for the v2 bridge design have negative effects for land fragments remaining in both amenity and ecological outcomes. The outcome is not in keeping with the expectations of the Structure Planning Process set out in the AUP.
NoR 5.3.4 Mentions how a culvert in stream F would involve a “magnitude of vegetation clearance” – No culvert mentioned v1. Bridge downgrade financial only. bridge mitigates this. A key component of the road corridor will be the new bridge which runs across Stream F. An indicative bridge design is shown in Figure 5.2 as a possible “worse case” scenario for land and vegetation clearance. Through detailed design, the design of the bridge may change. The indicative bridge design features a deck width of 13.2m, based on a pile structure across the stream’s gully. NoR 5.3.4 Mentions how a culvert in stream F would involve a “magnitude of vegetation clearance” – No culvert mentioned v1. Bridge downgrade financial only. bridge mitigates this. A key component of the road corridor will be the new bridge which runs across Stream F. An indicative bridge design is shown in Figure 5.2 as a possible “worse case” scenario for land and vegetation clearance. Through detailed design, the design of the bridge may change. The indicative bridge design features a deck width of 13.2m, based on a pile structure across the stream’s gully. NoR 6.2.2 Critical success factors for the project: Excerpt from Scrub Consultants Ltd Bush Assessment re our bush 8.0 Summary 2)The alignment must not pass through any QEII Trust land or any Significant Ecological Areas (SEA) The 3.3ha area proposed for formal protection on the Steel and Membery property qualifies as a significant natural area (SNA) under the RDC assessment process.
A combination of native forest, regenerating shrubland and native revegetation is present throughout the proposed covenant area. …. Cont..
The proposed covenant area is worthy of protection under the DP provisions due to the indigenous biodiversity values contained therein (both actual and potential), along with the erosion protection and soil conservation services the areas provides for.
The 3.3ha area is therefore recommended for protection.
710 The NoR documents identify that this bush meet the SEA status (refer to the assessment by Bio Researchers)
12 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Far more notice of this assessment needs to be taken in the design options for the bridge and managing vegetation in this part of the corridor. Environmental vandalism for the sake of it is not acceptable. NoR 6.2.7 “The agreed preferred option was Option A” Inadequate evidence why went away from this option to current option B? Option B would minimise the access issues currently faced by 245. NoR 9.1 pg Public consultation – response to submissions – chose their corridor (Look) Route selection - Justification of moving from option 63 As a response to these submissions, the project corridor now avoids the most significant A? ecological features within the immediate area. In addition, the corridor is future proofed for the Yet A, B & D better for bush preservation? (In ecological construction of intersections along its length, thereby supporting urban development in the assessment said B & C score more negatively pg 33) Project Corridor. O&Policy In addition, it is not possible to move the corridor, given the steep slopes towards the North. Steep slopes? – may mean other option further up Clayden E 15.3 This would require further earthworks and undermine the performance of the corridor due to Road but not option A as grades similar to chosen option B. Pg 36 road geometry. These further earthworks would also have the potential to affect the water Land Grades have been shown on WWS Plan supplied. quality of Streams E and F. Transport In Stage 1, Clayden Road will remain as existing but with appropriate signage in place so that Clayden Rd - Signage is going to help mitigate? Just what Pg 27, 4.3 potential safety effects the Project may have can be mitigated signage can mitigate playing jump the gap to get out at rush hour or peak traffic times, this requires much more explanation. Ecological It is estimated that a 0.12 ha fragment of anthropogenic tōtara forest would be removed for Mentioned earlier Dispute the notion that chopping down 2.3.1.3 construction of the carriageway, including approximately 0.00048ha of this vegetation within the the trees is permitted based on the SEA assessment riparian margin. Outside of the riparian margin the removal of this totara forest is a permitted provided, and just how necessary is it to remove these activity. trees. Also of concern is there is a 20 riparian margin on this stream under the Future Urban Rules. (see attached email Dan Rodie)
Ecological A Planting, Weed and Pest Management plan, for all areas of mitigation planting to be Must should replace should. Where is the Plan up front 2.4.2.4 undertaken as well as along the edges of all retained vegetation, should be prepared by a and how and who will be managing the planting if the land qualified ecologist and the Kauri Dieback Operating Procedure (Bioresearches 2017 (Appendix is given back. Why is it even being removed?, Where is the VIII)) should be adhered to at all times. planting plan. It should not be an OPW condition but have a level of agreement now to ensure effects are being mitigated. Ecological The construction of the temporary staging bridge and the permanent bridge (Stage 1 and 2) Bridge effects – temp and stage I. minor effects should not 3.3.5 would result in the loss of riparian vegetation which would in turn cause minor indirect adverse be ignored. Part II Section 6 RMA matters of national effects including reduced filtration activity and organic input. importance need to be addressed properly. Ecological Prior to stream works commencing a Native Fish Relocation Plan (NFRP) should be prepared Must? Should is not a strong enough requirement. and submitted to Auckland Council for approval.
711 3.4 Erosion Damming of creek and pumping around… ecologist to move fish Yard access to water?, Kauri dieback. How is this all to 6.5 work in real life.
13 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
4. Mitigation
NoR 1.7m of berm along southern boundary. Can find no info about berm design other then the cross 3. pg 6 sections. For stage 2 in 25 years time. What happens in the meantime for pedestrians, and land not developed.
NoR 7 Program objectives: 3 – provide a transport corridor that contributes positively to a quality urban Amenity value of FU Zoned land, is being compromised by environment (noise at 245?) AT short hanging on noise measures and berm design (none noted) and waiting for 25 years for that contribution. NoR 3.1 The project has been designed to contribute to a quality urban environment for WW – . Noise - not happy with road chip proposed in Stage 1 - 25 years seems an unreasonable time for future urban A second driver for the Project is the projected growth of Warkworth and the surrounding area. dwellers to have to listen to excessive noise Stage II Warkworth has a current population of 4,650 people and is expected to provide capacity for a upgrades being 25 years away just does not match with the community approximately 5 times this size over the coming decades. development projections for 245 which all reports other then the planners accept will be likely to occur in alignment with the completion of the motorway and the Link Road. The owners are not obliged to wait for Auckland Council to complete the structure plan, but even that is a temporary delay. NoR 4.1 pg While there are some dwellings that will be relatively close to construction activities and the 4m is not relatively close! It’s almost on top of the road. 245 19 alignment once operational, House location see attached diagram. 4.3 Clayden Road/ Matakana Road intersection The intersection of Clayden Road/ Matakana Road is a give way controlled intersection located 70m north of the new roundabout. In Stage 1, Clayden Road will remain as existing but with appropriate signage in place so that potential safety effects the Project may have can be mitigated.
In Stage 2, upgrades and minor realignment to the Clayden Road intersection is proposed as part of the Project. The upgrades include a minor realignment of the Clayden Road intersection to allow widening of Matakana Road on the approach to the roundabout.
In Stage 2, a splitter island on the approach to the roundabout will separate northbound and southbound traffic on Matakana Road. A gap in the splitter island will allow for right turning traffic out of Clayden Road to head south on Matakana Road. The splitter island will restrict right turns into Clayden Road from the north. Southbound vehicles wanting to turn right into Clayden Road will have to continue south making a U-turn at the roundabout and turn left into 712 Clayden Road.
14 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
NoR 8.8.2 The assessment undertaken for the Stage 1 works confirmed that due to the distance (i.e. Vibration, noise and dust are likely to be untenable for this Pg 57 approximately 30m) between the majority of the nearest buildings and the location of the works submitter. Just what uncertainty is there about the and/or any construction vehicles, the Project will comply with the required standards for the continued occupation of this family home. Even with majority of sites. It is noted that the dwelling at 245 Matakana Road is located closer than 30m complying noise and vibration the lives of this family will be to the area of works, but given the uncertainty associated with the continued occupation of this disrupted severely during the construction process and this dwelling, AT will continue to work with the landowners to address any potential effects on the should not be equated to decibels and vibration metres, but property, including through the development of the CNVMP and a Site Specific Noise and to ordinary everyday living and being able to keep a cup of Vibration Management Plan if needed). tea on the table, and being able to hear birds sing, not Pg 58 - Where it is not possible to comply with noise standards due to the proximity or duration machinery rumble. The affected party issues around this of works, such as potentially at 245 Matakana Road, the use of site-specific noise management have not been resolved. At this stage site specifc nise plans will address any adverse effects and ensure that practicable mitigation is put in place management has not been offered to the landholders at 245. NoR 8.8.3 The second scenario involved a “do minimum” approach, where the road was constructed without any noise-specific mitigation. Suggests no mitigation for noise in stage 1. The modeling The results of the modelling demonstrated that overall the “do nothing” option generated more data is currently back being re assessed so this part of the noise for those residents along existing road corridors, due in part to the concentration of traffic assessment is not accurate to 245. flows into a smaller number of road corridors. Noting that the modelling was based on the ‘do minimum’ scenario which does not include noise-specific mitigation, there are a range of measures available to manage and mitigate the operational effects, specifically those anticipated at 42A State Highway 1, although the dwelling Do minimum does not acknowledge 2022 FU still has the at this site is located within a light industrial zone. Potential options include bunding, noise walls right to a quality environment even if it has a different set of or the use of low noise road surfaces, although given the uncertainty with the continued modelling parameters. Noting 245 currently enjoys high occupation of these dwellings, site specific mitigation may not be required. amenity values that would have continued into an urban With regard to Stage 2, it was noted in the report by Marshall Day, that the surrounding area environment that includes the native forest and its morning and its associated ambient noise levels will have changed significantly in comparison to the and evening bird chorus.Noise id far more complicated then existing environment. This is due to the proposed urbanisation of the surrounding area and the taking background level.. Back ground levels of what? presence of an operating first stage of the Project. Modelling undertaken by Marshall Day indicates that the majority of PPFs within the Project area will continue to within Category A noise levels, with the exception of the same properties that do not achieve Category A status under Stage 1.
The second scenario involved a “do minimum” approach, where the road was constructed without any noise-specific mitigation. There will be a whole lot more of these post 2022.
The results of the modelling demonstrated that overall the “do nothing” option generated more noise for those residents along existing road corridors, due in part to the concentration of traffic flows into a smaller number of road corridors It is a nonsense to suggest there will be less noise to 245 property with MLR than a do nothing approach. – road 713 within 2.5 m of the new boundary and 4 metres from the house. There will now be two road boundaries instead of 1.
15 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
The timing of FUZ being developed – live 2022. Simply does not tie in with AT approach. Transport The project proposes a roundabout at the intersection of Matakana Road with the new MLR, PG 26 which would be constructed in stages. The proposed single lane layout for Stage 1 is shown in Affected party issues poorly addressed. Figure 4-5. Driveways will be reconstructed to maintain access from Matakana Road to 245 Driveway access – construction of driveway, fencing Matakana Road. This driveway may be cut off during construction but appropriate access to the amenity, planting etc? – when done? Lack of information. properties will be maintained through temporary accesses or other measures. Due to the Lack of information for re instatement of lease land. proximity to the intersection, the main access to 245 Matakana Road may become “Left In Left Out” only. An alternative access will be provided at the southern end of the section which will Loss of our access to yard, limited access main driveway. allow all movements in and out of the property. Transport Generally 7am to 5:30pm – although 6pm in summer would be beneficial to the project (even if Hours of operation noted for this family will be a recipe for AWPS., pg this later time this is limited to weekdays only) ● 6 days per week generally but 7 days per week extreme stress at 245. 14 for earthworks, bearing in mind that when it rains productions will slow or stop completely for earthworks related activities Air Quality Specific additional measures may be needed for those sensitive receptors that are very close to Mentions possible mitigation options for ‘sensitive 8.2 the works, and could include: wind fencing; house cleaning; and/or temporary relocation. receptors’.. but nothing yet offered. Affected party issues. Specific mitigation measures for the operational effects of the Project are not needed because the potential effects assessed for the alignment are acceptable. Noise During the construction of Stage 1, all dwellings except 245 Matakana Road are more than 50 Mitigation 5.5 metres from the construction site….
The dwelling at 245 Matakana Road is approximately 10 metres from the closest works, with 245 family home is 4m from proposed works boundary. noise levels for closest earthworks likely to be between 75 to 80 dB LAeq without mitigation. This isalso the north side of the house, so not just noise, Mitigation would need to be determined and implemented if the dwelling is inhabited during but dust, and fumes from heavy machinery, vibration, heat construction. This could be done through a site-specific noise management plan. (windows and doors on north side) , Loss of privacy (trees being cut down) and amenity. Affected party issue.
Noise Look Table 1 pg 6– numbers differ from v1 Are they using the correct land designation? Noise For stage I of this report – the design year is 2036? What? Seems somewhat stretched out to consider noise in Pg 8 2036 when the issues will be and are far more current then 24 years away. Noise The dwelling at 245 Matakana Road would be the closest to the works. A partial land take Mitigation .. affected party matters still not resolved. 5.2 would be required from this property. Therefore, discussions with the owner would be required 245 is still an affected party and matters agreed is not with the view of reaching agreement, which would go beyond noise and/or vibration effects but resolved. involve a raft of measures as agreed between the parties. 714 Noise However, in addition, some night-time and Public Holiday works may be required at the tie in Working hours… - any work within 250 m of 245 house not with the existing SH1 and Matakana Road, in order to avoid traffic disruption. Due to the remote allowed on Sundays? Leased yard?...
16 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
nature of some of the Stage 1 works, in a currently vacant rural block, Sunday and Public Holiday works would be appropriate in these areas, with a minimum distance of 250 metres to Some exceedance of noise 3 consecutive nights or 10 any dwelling in order to achieve compliance with the 50 dB LAeq daytime noise criterion on consectutive days. All of these things are extreme stress Sundays or Public Holidays. matters for this family at 245. Noise Vibration: The dwelling at 245 Matakana Road is potentially within 10 metres of closest Email from AT dated 6/11 shows construction boundary 4m earthworks. This means that equipment such as vibratory rollers and large excavators should from house. Mitigation hasn’t been provided for and even if be used with caution in the vicinity of this dwelling. A site-specific vibration management plan specific vibration management is provided for, the cup of setting out specific management and mitigation may be required if the dwelling still exists during tea won’t stay on the table. It is also noted that electronic construction of the Project. equipment hates vibration.
As noted in Section 5.2, the land take required at 245 Matakana Road would involve negotiations to result in agreements that would cover a variety of issues including construction noise and vibration, and would deal with the specific mitigation and management measures required at this dwelling, should it be occupied during construction. Nevertheless, a site specific vibration management schedule is recommended should this prove necessary at the time of construction. Noise Assessment of traffic noise effects – “generally unnoticeable change” A joke. A road this close to this house and to future 6.4.1 houses on the link road boundaries will obviously be far greater then if the road was not there for this site. What additional costs would be incurred on a subdivision to address amenity factors because AT has not offered a noise wall or quiet seal or visual amenity mitugation on the boundaries of the road (north and south). The roundabout will be a significant queue point in peak periods as people come off the Link Road onto the Matakana Road and then queue to get on Sharp Road to go to Sandspit/Snells Algies etc. Amenity values for this property will be compromised compared to now. Landscape Visual effects on houses low – ours missed out? 245 does not seem to be properly assessed in terms of 4.9 visual effects, which is somewhat surprising in terms for the road, and bridge construction and commentary in the expert information lodged with the application. Landscape Temp effects during construction: “ additional adverse effects from the clutter of materials, Mitigation 245 gets all the crap on its boundary..what is machinery and construction yards. The main construction yard is envisaged at the eastern end offered to manage this issue, toilets, sheds, rubbish, of the road at 245 Matakana rd. storage, ..site offices… etc Landscape Very high adverse effects during construction on 245. Nothing offered to 245. Very high adverse effects is not 4.16 minor or less then minor its more than minor.
715 5. Various
17 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
NoR 3.2 Talks about removal of opportunities after stage I to ‘reduce boundaries’ What does this mean to 245 . Further information required to asses effects properly. NoR 3.3 Future intersections along the length of Matakana link road will be constructed by developers We’ve been told no intersections allowed MLR for 245. Pg 12 as the surrounding area is urbanised…..
NoR Pg 47 It is not proposed to undertake mitigation planting for the remaining 0.67 ha of vegetation To say as FUZ land that the loss of vegetation is provided removal within the podocarp forest. This vegetation is not subject to protection, given the for is somewhat perplexing as a Structure Plan permitted activity status for its removal under the AUP-OP. The AUP-OP has identified this requirement (AUP Appendix 1) states; 1.4.2. Natural section of the Project corridor as suitable for urban development, which includes the removal of resources (1) The protection, maintenance and enhancement of vegetation outside the protected riparian margins. While the detailed design will seek to natural resources, particularly those that have been scheduled minimise the overall quantum of vegetation clearance required for the Project, this clearance in the Unitary Plan in relation to Mana Whenua, natural was anticipated and provided for when the affected area was included in the FUZ. resources, and the coastal environment. The majority of this fragment is not protected under the AUP-OP and can be removed as of (2) Demonstrate how proposed subdivision, use, and right without the need for resource consent, although AT will seek to retain as much of this development will protect, maintain and enhance the values of vegetation, where practicable. the resources identified in 1.4.2(1) above. (3) The integration of green networks (such as freshwater and coastal water systems, and ecological corridors) with open space and pedestrian and cycle networks, showing how they reflect the underlying natural character values and provide opportunities for environmental restoration and biodiversity. NoR 8.4 Visual and Landscape Effects: Given that the project is an enabler of this planned urban Turnstone Environment Court ruling shows developers are development – (footnote 8) the FULSS indicated that the FUZ sites within the Project Corridor land banking and progressing individual plans.. and it is and planned to be released for development from 2022. known to be the case for the North Warkworth FUZ land holdings. NoR Pg 50 When viewed from the surrounding private properties, the greatest effects expected will be on Acknowledgement of negative effects here but poorly the property at 245 Matakana Road, given the proximity of the Project to the existing dwelling. articulated in the planning report. While the Project will alter the outlook of this property, the road will be 1.5m below the The point is 245 can not use this road. It has not advantage property’s yard and once redevelopment of the area occurs, this proximity to a road corridor will to this landholding. be similar, if not greater, than experienced for other potential residential properties along the corridor. NoR 8.5.2 Road safety has also been a key consideration in the design process. The diversion of traffic Clayden Rd is 70m from intersection does not meet safety pg 53 from SH1 to the Project is expected to provide a midblock crash reduction benefit due to the requirements of the NZTA Planning Policy Manual. Yet this safer design of the new road and reduction in network congestion. It is acknowledged that the will be a negative to developers up Clayden Rd who in all distance at both the Clayden Road/Matakana Road and the Matakana link road/Matakana likelihood within 5 years will be having a hell time getting Road intersections do not meet the safety requirements of the New Zealand Transport consent as AT will be citing its standards. This needs Agency’s Planning Policy Manual as there is less than 200m between proposed and existing sorting now. intersections. In response, a raised median strip and shoulder improvements are proposed on Matakana Road to reduce the risk of unsafe vehicle movements to and from Clayden Road. NoR Pg 55 Air Quality Effects AT’s own description of likely land use for 245 accepts that 716 A minimum 2m separation distance was utilised given the likely residential zoning within the this land will be developed to a reasonably high density (in current FUZ and the setback controls of the AUP-OP’s Residential Mixed Housing Suburban keeping with the compact form)
18 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
zone, which was considered the densest form of residential development likely to occur along the Project corridor. NoR 9.1 pg Public consultation – response to submissions – chose their corridor Route selection - Justification of moving from option A? 63 As a response to these submissions, the project corridor now avoids the most significant Yet A, B & D better for bush preservation? (In ecological ecological features within the immediate area. In addition, the corridor is future proofed for the assessment said B & C score more negatively pg 33) construction of intersections along its length, thereby supporting urban development in the Project Corridor. NoR 10.7.2 Auckland Future Land Supply Strategy (FULSS) The road is not critical for 245, as this property has no The FULSS was adopted by AC in July 2017 and is a region wide strategic document detailing access from it ever. the location and timing for the release of new greenfield areas. It recognises the importance of aligning infrastructure planning with growth management and identifies the Warkworth North area as being development ready by 2022. The Project is critical to delivering this greenfield capacity, given the improved accessibility it provides to sites along its length. Without the Project, the opening up of these sites to greenfield development could be delayed and/or at lower development yields, thereby undermining the growth objectives of the FULSS and the wider sustainable urban development of Auckland. NoR Plans Property Impact Plan – red construction zone enters over our garden/trees Have received exploded drawing – while have been (Visual affects plan talks about retaining trees if possible – what mitigation if not?) verbally told that while they will try to retain two mature oak trees, have also said will replant if needed. The construction zone comes within 4m of the house. O&Policy The Project takes into consideration the adjacent land and zoning and has been designed in a Access constraints to 245 will not maximize the Pg 5 manner that will ensure that the maximum development potential can be achieved along with development potential with the issues on Matakana Road ensuring the provision of sufficient access to any future development that may take place and Clayden road and the roundabout design. O&Policies FUZ - Rural Production Zone until it has been rezoned for urban purposes. Impossible to farm 245 with a giant road corridor severing it Pg 49 (2) Rural activities and services are provided for to support the rural community until the land is in half and having to use Matakana Road to walk the cattle rezoned for urban purposes. up and then through a busy roundabout and even more fun coming south.
O&Policies The Project supports the outcomes sought by the Future Urban Zone. While no structure plan Pg 49 has been finalised for the Project area, it is critical that future transport links, such as this Restricts 245s land. Project, are planned for and protected. The Project will assist in the urbanisation of Northern Warkworth, improving access to both live zoned light industrial sites, as well as Future Urban zoned land beside Matakana Road and SH1. The options assessment process which was Cannot find in any of the reports that support this notion in undertaken for the Project determined that the chosen option was the best for supporting urban the publically available documents. development, providing for development to both the North and South of the corridor, while also linking to possible future connections to West Warkworth and Sandspit Road. Furthermore, the Project does not compromise the ability for the surrounding sites to continue to be used for rural land use activities prior to their urban development. The effects of the Project are limited and are unlikely to prevent pastoral farming to continue. As such, the Project is also consistent Unable to farm or use this land as a single title following the 717 with the objectives and policies of the underlying rural zone development of the corridor from the minute site works commence so this statement is simply incorrect for 245.
19 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Transport Property Access: The Project is intended to provide access to FUZ sites and create a section of Access is far from certain for 245. 4.4 pg 27 an arterial road network which will enable access for the urban land development expected in northern Warkworth. The road will provide certainty for developers on land accessibility. Transport Regional transport demands from the ART20 model. The demand forecasts from ART are This provides enough information to assume a higher Pg 29 based on Scenario I11.4 growth assumptions to reflect the latest forecasts from AFC. This density then single house zone for 245 and more likely a scenario was developed by Auckland Council to reflect the Auckland Unitary Plan and the 2017 mixed housing urban or suburban type of zone. refresh of the Future Urban Land Supply Strategy. This scenario reflects a quality compact approach to urban form.21 Compared to the previous land use scenario (I9 modified), I11.4 assumes a more compact urban form with more employment in Warkworth and results in reduced travel demand and shorter trips around Warkworth. Air Quality In the AUP, the front yard setback in the Future Urban zone is 20 m for sites adjoining arterial 2.2.6 roads and 10 m for all other sites, however, when the land is rezoned following a structure V1 specified 2.5m setback planning process, it has the potential to be rezoned for residential purposes in which case the front yard setback may be as little as 1.5 m. As such, this assessment has been undertaken with a 10 m, 5 m and 2 m front yard in the Future Urban Zone, to account for potential future sensitive receptor locations and likely development patterns. Air Quality The traffic modelling takes into account the AUP Future Urban zone around the proposed What does this actually mean? 7.1 alignment.10 The Matakana Link Road is considered a committed road and is a necessity to cater for expected future development. In order to model the ‘Without Project 2036’ scenario, the Matakana Link Road was severed rather than removed entirely to maintain access for local traffic to and from the development located on Matakana Link Road. The traffic model assumes that development will go ahead whether or not infrastructure is provided. Air Quality Should the future urban land be rezoned as residential land, following structure planning, this What is the generous berm; Stage one or stage 2? And just 7.2.2 xxxi could likely result in future residential development being located as close as 2.5 m to the how wide is it. This property is within walking distance to Project and Matakana Road - road edge, based on the Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone town, so will have a higher density house zone to meet the setbacks. More intensive forms of residential development are unlikely given the distance of the “compact Urban Form” surrounding sites from the town centre, although modelling indicates that the Project would Air quality is obviously important. comply with relevant air quality standards were residential dwellings located closer than 2.5m from the road boundary. It is also noted that the generously sized berms and active transport facilities also provide separation distance between emission generating vehicles and potential housing sites. Jacobs has therefore assessed the ‘With Project 2036’ scenario for all roads with receptor locations at a 10 m, 5 m and 2 m separation distance from the edge of the carriageway. Assessing this separation distance from all three roads included in the model assumes that a sensitive receptor could be located anywhere up to 2 m to any of the road edges, ensuring a conservative assessment allowing for future development.
718
20 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Erosion Preliminary structure planning for land use shows the easterly extend of the project route as This is accepted in some documents but then treated as an 4.1 having an underlying residential zone. unkown in other documents. This creates uncertainty which is not helpful. Noise The dwelling at 245 Matakana Road would be the closest to the works. A partial land take Mitigation not yet agreed. Still an affected party. 5.2 would be required from this property. Therefore, discussions with the owner would be required with the view of reaching agreement, which would go beyond noise and/or vibration effects but involve a raft of measures as agreed between the parties. Landscape Such urbanization is likely to occur around the same time the road is constructed or shortly If so, then why is access to an improved roundabout not for 1.4 afterwards 25 years. It does not make sense to create a “Hill Street” when the ability to take the land and construct a decent intersection exists now. Landscape The alignment traverses land that is in the process of urbanization on the north-west fringes of See all of above. 2.2 Warkworth. It is anticipated that the land adjacent to the Project will be developed at around the same time as the road is constructed, or shortly thereafter. Landscape It is reasonable to assume the future urban zone will be mainly used for residential activities 3.13 given the context. However areas could also be assigned to other urban activities such as Whilst as stated the Unitary Plan allows for a range of community facilities, open space or business uses. It is therefore not possible to be certain activities unless the current owner committed to one of what mix of urban activities will adjoin the road. those activities this is speculation and that would not throw the traffic modelling to that great a level to be significant based on balance of probabilities.
Landscape The other main factor that will determine the character and amenity of the road is the manner in – (relatively high amenity – this amenity value because of 4.24 which the adjacent land is developed. Such development will be subject to the AUP(OP), the MLR will be lower than it would have been otherwise.) including the outcomes of structure planning for the Future Urban Zone> As discussed, it has chopping down large chunks of bush “because we can” been assumed that the ‘Future Urban’ and adjacent to the eastern end of the road will be zoned attitude is AT Planner is not in keeping with this for residential activities (although other urban activities may be incorporated) and that it will assessment. The complemented bush back drop is being have a relatively high amenity, complemented by the bush backdrop” ignored by the planning approach that is contrary to the Structure Plan aspirations (required to be assessed).
6. Lease Area: NoR 5.2.2 Leased area will be “fenced off for security” Lease - fencing, will it be removed after? And reinstatement to what standard? NoR 5.3.3 Stormwater – in accordance with “AC’s GD01” Was TP10 in V1?- what is the difference in documents and Catch pits and associated pipework in the Project corridor will collect surface run-off and implications in design and amenity for what will be transfer it to each of the respective stormwater wetlands, where it is stored and slowly released neighboring houses to a wet pond. to ensure hydraulic neutrality while also providing appropriate levels of treatment. Each of these wetlands have been designed to take flows from their respective catchments within the road Note a catch pit seems to encroach outside of project corridor, with their location defined by local geotechnical conditions. The wetland outlets will designation area into 245s land - what effects on 719 also be designed to minimise scouring and erosion of downstream channels. neighboring future properties? 245 is an affected party NoR 5.4.2 Lease Access for Stage II “it is not currently possible to identify the location of construction Assuming not 245’s as it will have had houses on it for yards/site office. 25years ! poor planning ! 21 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Air Quality Excavation of Contaminated Material Any material that has been identified as contaminated is Storage of contaminated materials on lease land? This is a expected to be immediately evaluated and disposed of. ● If material cannot be taken off-site real concern given NES contamination requirements and 6.1.3, xix immediately, it will be covered to prevent dust generation. impacts on the future use of this land. Erosion “Final location of yard confirmed after contract award? Assume within lease area? 3.1 Erosion Asphalt works and concrete pumping: Wash all equipment and tools in a designated wash area Lease area contamination issues of major concern. 5.4 pg 14 or on a large grassed area… Erosion Wheel wash – silt fences Lease area/stream contamination – kauri dieback 6.1 Erosion Mana whenua – retention of excavated soils on site contaminated materials remediated on site At odds with Construction plan? Contamination of lease 7 - or safely and appropriate disposed of land. Appropriately disposed of is of concern as what standard will this meet in terms of the land future use. Erosion (Site reinstatement) any trapped sediment will be moved off site to landfill. Management plan to ensure this happens is required! 11 Erosion Any requirement for chemical treatment including design…. What does this mean? How will flocculation be managed 12 and monitored. Erosion Should excessive sediment be found downstream contractor may be required to cover the cost May? Surely all consent conditions must be part of a 9 of cleaning and remediation. contractors and subcontractors requirement to comply with and they should have a copy of this document on site. A designation should have a set of conditions that ensure compliance otherwise the whole point is lost.
7. Issues for Future Development NoR 6.4 pg Pg 41 – constructed wetland provides the best stormwater mngt solution as opposed to earlier What ongoing contingency plan has been made for the 41 design involving dry ponds. cleaning of the constructed wetland which will be required from time to time, it will require contaminated sludge to be removed and dried before transporting. How will this be carried out and where. Affected party matters here not yet resolved.
NoR It is noted that the Project will also entail a number of large box cuts and fill embankments to Effect on land for future development? Will the design Pg 49 & 50 provide a safe road corridor. While these ground level changes will range between 4.3m and ensure that future development is not impeded? 10.1m in height, the box cuts will assist in obscuring views of the Project from the surrounding properties (including the Warkworth Showgrounds) while the embankments will also affect minor gullies. NoR Pg 59 Given the future urbanisation of the sites adjacent to the Project corridor, it is possible that FU from 2022 – concerned about effects on many buildings more sensitive vibration receivers will be present when Stage 2 is delivered. In response, at Stage II Marshall Day have recommended that mitigation be undertaken to avoid building damage, such 720 as the use of non-vibratory compaction equipment or similar measures
22 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
O&Policy Objective B2.3.1 – maximise resource and infrastructure efficiency Restrictions on land development for 245 that don’t meet App D (Air Quality) - Modelling undertaken for the Project also demonstrates that the operation of the this objective that result because of the designation Pg 19 road is not expected to generate significant air quality effects or limit the ability for surrounding proposed. sites to be developed for residential or other sensitive land use activities. O&Policies (Noise & Vibration) The operational effects from the proposed new road and the alteration to Concerned about mitigation of noise on properties Pg 40 Matakana Road are considered negligible and in line with those anticipated by the zoning and developed post 2022. will not prevent the development of Future Urban zoned land for residential activities. Transport Regional transport demands from the ART20 model. The demand forecasts from ART are Do we assume that this land will be developed to a Mixed Pg 29 based on Scenario I11.4 growth assumptions to reflect the latest forecasts from AFC. This Housing Suburban or Urban density. Which means higher scenario was developed by Auckland Council to reflect the Auckland Unitary Plan and the 2017 traffic volumes. Work in Warkworth is based on 1:1 per refresh of the Future Urban Land Supply Strategy. This scenario reflects a quality compact household, so that means a lot of jobs will still be out of the approach to urban form.21 Compared to the previous land use scenario (I9 modified), I11.4 region. ( and not in keeping with standards) assumes a more compact urban form with more employment in Warkworth and results in reduced travel demand and shorter trips around Warkworth. Transport When the project opens, there will not yet be any development along the road that would No intersection for 245s land – development ready 2022. Pg 48 require pedestrian access and no footpath on the other side of the road, and therefore, no need The visual amenity report talks about land being developed for crossing the road midblock. When the adjacent land is developed there will be intersections soon after – so a road intersection will be required yet this constructed onto MLR; pedestrian crossing facilities will be considered at this point in time. has not been considered at all and this site is being put into immediate non compliance with Council and AT standards for development.
Air Quality It also noted that any future residential and commercial areas during the Stage 2 works are Concerns re effects on properties stage II. A common error XII likely to have a “high air quality’ classification as per the AUP. This future classification has is running along this whole assessment that it is assumed been considered in the modelling undertaken and discussed further in this report. the North will not be developed for 25 years, which is plain incorrect. Also noting the FULSS strategy is not a statutory Figure 1 presents the location of the sensitive receptors that have the most potential to be document, and AT are not supposed to be using the affected by the construction and operation of the Project and Table 4 presents the receptors FULSS to determining development. AT are supposed to that are considered to be in representative worst case locations within 200 m of the proposed be enabling development. Water Care are enabling alignment. development so why is AT restricting development.
The whole property (245) is within 200m of alignment – effects for FU properties.. (look diagram xxii) Noise During the construction of Stage 2 of the road the area adjacent to the designation may already Stage II concerns re noise 5.5 be developed with commercial or residential activities. In that event, any works would need to comply, as far as practicable, with the relevant noise standards at buildings existing during construction. Noise The road surface for Stage 1 of the Matakana Link Road (Tuhonohono ki Tai) would be chip Noise – Given land is urban from 2022 – to have to wait for 6.1 seal and the average speed is understood to be 50 km/h. When Stage 2 is constructed, the low noise chip seal proposed not until 2036-36! – Up to 24 721 entire road, including the Stage 1 traffic lanes, will be resealed with asphalted concrete, which years after development! is a lower noise generating road surface than chip seal
23 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
V1 had “stone mastic asphalt” surely ding the job up front Section 7 – conclusion says: “It is noted that low noise road surface is proposed to be has a cost benefit ratio in the positive. implemented in Stage 2”. Landscape In terms of the planned urban environment, it is anticipated that the surrounding land will be 4.7 extensively re-graded to accommodate development. It is reasonable to assume that such re- What evidence do AT have that they whole of 245 would be grading will reduce the spurs and fill in the gullies so as to bring the topography towards the earth-worked at the time of construction. Are they lodging a level set by the MLR project. It is also reasonable to anticipate that such earthworks might be consent to allow this to occur in cooperation with the carried out around the same time as the bulk earthworks for the road are carried out. owners of 245? Bulk earthworks are not cheap. Nothing known by 245.
8. Other: NoR 3.3 Further modelling undertaken post-March 2018 under the i11.4 land use scenario (as See change in modelling for traffic. This is very poor developed by AC to reflect the Auckland Plan update and FULSS) identified changes in behavior on the part of AC as the role of AT is to facilitate Pg 12 projected traffic volumes under the previous i9 land use scenario. This modelling indicated a development. The FULSS states development will be slower increase in traffic volumes, limiting the need to provide a full four-lane corridor by the constrained without the roading network. Which dog is mid-2020s.To align with the modelling, AT has introduced a staged approach to the Project’s wagging which tail. AT are then deliberately constraining delivery, as described in Section 5 of the AEE. development which is perverse to requirements of AT to enable development. NOR pg 14 Subject to detailed design, there may be opportunities after Stage 1 to reduce the boundaries. What does this mean to the land at 245? NoR 5.1 pg “align with current traffic modelling associated with the i.11.4 land use scenarios, where the Noise - Concerned about adverse effects on FU homes 20 modelling is suggesting that four lanes are not required until between 2036 and 2046” built from 2022. Need low noise road chip. NoR 6.2.2 Critical success factors for the project continued.. One Warkworth advocating link rd access will block end of 6) must not adversely affect the performance of the rd of national significance. motorway? NoR 6.2.7 “The agreed preferred option was Option A” Inadequate evidence why went away from this option? NoR 9.4 Furthermore, the use of management plans for the Project provides a flexible approach to What is definition of minor? Worried they will make more implementation of both the NoR and resource consent applications, thereby allowing for minor than minor changes and address through management design changes to improve the operation of both projects. plans that the landholders of 245 will then have no say in. Transport V1 used the Saturn Model, v2 uses the ART model(pg 29) 5.1v1 Transport Traffic demands have been grown to the year 2021, using an annual growth rate of 2.5% per Version 1 growth rate was 4.3% how has this altered so 5.2 year. This growth rate is the average growth rate of the total traffic in the model between 2016 significantly? and 2026. Transport This indicates that the Project would be congested at this stage. To provide resilience and Timing of Stage II – to mention stage 2 from 2036-46 when Pg 45 reduce the risk of queuing four lanes would need to be provided by 2036 or very shortly after. says will fail by 2036!
9. Statutory Assessment 722 Rules not adequately assessed in terms of reasonable future use of 245 land and expectation of assessment for NoR designation
24 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Table E26.2.3.2 Activity table for road network activities The assessment in consideration of ensuring that the land within 245 (north (A69) Construction of unformed roads RD# (normal tests for notification) and south of the new corridor) will be able to meet the current standards for roading with compliance with the position of the roundabout. (d) the extent to which severance effects and changes to drainage patterns can be avoided, remedied or mitigated; and (e) whether the safety and efficiency of the transport network will be compromised and the impact on the network and levels of service if the work is not undertaken. Road Activity Status E27.9 E27 has not been adequately tested to ensure that the road corridor can meet the requirements of future development without triggering high level of non compliance. 245 Matakana Road will be compromised as the road intersections with the new Roundabout are being forced into a non compliance. (5) Any new activity or change to an existing activity, which is not specifically As above provided for in the activity tables in the applicable zone or is a non- complying land use activity, and which will generate 100 vehicles or more (any hour) may need to include an Integrated Transport Assessment prepared in accordance with the Auckland Transport Integrated Transport Assessment Guidelines in force at the time of the application. Access (20) Require vehicle crossings and associated access to be designed Not adequately assessed to ensure that the road design of MLR is not going and located to provide for safe, effective and efficient movement to and to unreasonably hinder the future development of 245. It is unreasonable to from sites and minimise potential conflicts between vehicles, pedestrians, have not addressed these issues in the design of the road and the and cyclists on the adjacent road network. roundabout intersection with Matakana Road and Clayden Road. (21) Restrict or manage vehicle access to and from sites adjacent to intersections, adjacent motorway interchanges, and on arterial roads, so that: (a) the location, number, and design of vehicle crossings and associated access provides for the efficient movement of people and goods on the road network; and (b) any adverse effect on the effective, efficient and safe operation of the motorway interchange and adjacent arterial roads arising from vehicle
723 access adjacent to a motorway interchange is avoided, remedied or mitigated.
25 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Regional Earthworks- E11.4.1 RD rules (A5) Greater than 50,000m2 where land has a slope less than 10 degrees The earthworks have been assumed to be a controlled activity however just outside the Sediment Control Protection Area1 (refer to definition) looking at 245 and the area of the Sediment Control Area as well as the (A8) Greater than 2,500m2 where the land has a slope equal to or greater gradient of the slopes on this property alone, it is unlikely that sediment than 10 degrees control is a controlled activity under the regional rules and should be re - (A9) Greater than 2,500m2 within the Sediment Control Protection Area1 assessed. Refer to Warkworth Surveyors Plan of 245 to see slopes and 50 metre line. Sediment Control Protection Area (a) 100m either side of a foredune or 100m landward of the coastal area (whichever is the more landward of Assessment criteria relating to loss of vegetation as part of earthworks mean high water springs); or (b) 50m landward of the edge of a lake, river or inadequately assessed. (see assessment criteria) stream, or the edge of a wetland of 1,000m2 or greater.
Loss of vegetation as part of earthworks Kauri are on the property and neighboring property. Given the disease Earthwork protocols for Kauri Dieback travels well through water protocols should be assessed. Vegetation removal (see below)
SEA vegetation rules As a designation full consideration should have been given to the SEA assessment of the stand of riparian forest on 245. The Council have an agreed position in the high court that SEA regardless of the planning consequences is based on the policy criteria. The applicants own expert opinion has this forest as SEA. It is adjacent to SEA and to ignore the High Court Decision is not acceptable. It is not known if this forest was deliberately excluded due to future works and a then incorrect approach to SEA by Council at the time of the PAUP development). It must be correctly considered. (see attached decision details) Using leaseland that is obviously forest clad is an appalling disregard to the quality and value of the forest including the totara trees and including the regenerating bush. Most of the lease area is within native vegetation. E 15 Vegetation Management Rules These simply have not been assessed. Clarification on the margin size is
724 required as Future Urban Land is not yet an Urban Zone. See attached
26 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
email from Dan Rodie Principal Planner . Margin size should be taken as 20 metres.
725
27 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Summary of Submission:
Route Selection – insufficient evidence to justify the switch from preferred route A to B? the evidence may well exist but it hasn’t been articulated well.
Access: the key Objective of the Link road is to open up land to development – it may do the opposite for 245. With Clayden Rd and access onto Matakan aRoad severely restricted.,(MLR takes into consideration modelling of growth in the direct vicinity (to which is opening to dvlp)– but not prepared to include this growth into figures (as outside scope of this project). Structure plan, contrary to objectives to allowing develop of FUZ, our driveway, loss of driveway to yard, woolshed. Fence quality of new driveway, maintenance etc… not well assessed.
Farm – inability to continue rural use from construction onwards (compensation). splits 245’s title – need seperate titles, who is going to survey and manage title.
Mitigation during and post works has not been well thought through for 245– noise, vibration, dust, hours of work (nights/Sundays), specimen trees to property – replant/mitigation/cost? Have a say in design of retaining wall, berm planting etc as will effect FU development. No description of berm planting? “1.7m berm on projects southern boundary”. Mitigation should specimen trees in garden not able to be saved?
Lease area - affected party matters– fences, silt, gradient/earthworks planned works with the landowners plans for land? contamination, stockpiling materials, kauri dieback, water/power supply, portaloos etc, return to grass, containers moved. Waterway in lease area. Fill – engineered and regressed? – what else? Stage II assuming no lease area on 245
Amenity - FU Properties – noise, stage II construction 2036 – development ready 2022 – 24 years later get low noise seal. 11-12 months of construction effects. Loss of amenity due to bush removal, wetlands. Street lighting. Talks about berm being upgraded to future separate walking and cycling facilities for both sides of the road.
726
28 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Protection of bush and waterways – movement of water/soil – kauri dieback. Sufficient replanting weed and pest control not noted in the application. This bush has a 223 plan so has legal effect as a site and the covenant plan has been lodged. The Bush meets the SEA criteria and not assessed properly.
Issues Register with AT ● Noise – no mitigation of any noise effects until 2036/46 ● Movement of our containers – to where? ● Chook shed. ● Mitigation of visual effects – garden – retain trees, what if not? – retaining wall, planting, cost of replacement trees, driveway and trees, metaling etc? o 245’s land will end up being subdivided by this road. Who will pay for the surveying of this? Will need separate title?
Management Plans being post consent Affected Party concerns - Worried about these management plans – outside of the NoR document – ability for them to dictate what they want to landowners outside of the consenting process with no ability other than the court process to participate. A designation is a powerful planning tool with little or no recourse to challenge, so any “after the event” management plans can be very problematic, particularly when there is not clear parameters to them.
Stage 2 development- inappropriate to hinder the development of 245 for 25 years. Not acceptable and does not fit the purpose of AT providing this road.
727
29 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Remediation sought
● The Road intersection access with Matakana Road, the Link Road and Clayden Road is designed now to ensure 245 Matakana Road will be in compliance with the AT standards and the AUP subdivision requirements for its future Urban subdivision.
● The more than minor effects on the Amenity values and Ecological values on 245 Matakana Road in terms of Loss of riparian forest and other trees is minimized to that actually required ( truck parking, and sheds for construction isn’t a requirement to remove trees)
● Contaminated land following development that is Lease Land is fully remediated ● Leased land is handed back in a manner that will not require major earthworks to remediate for future development so any filling is carried out to engineered standards for future development.
● Temporary construction effects are properly addressed as they affect 245 Matakana Road
● The design of the road is based on development along the road corridor occurring in a 5 year framework NOT a 25 year plus framework
● AT enable development, not control development
● The effects for the family business are addressed properly.
● The effects on the total severance of this property in half are properly addressed.
● As a cover all, all the matters raised in this submission and submission points are addressed as they affect 245 Matakana Road, now and in the future, including design of the corridor, and all amenity matters raised.
728
30 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
● The designation does not leave matters that will have adverse effects to management plans, or detailed design plans without clear parameters to those plans.
Attachment1 High Court Decision Reference to SEA Maps
729
31 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
730
32 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Attachment 2 Exploded drawing of house and road construction 731
33 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
732 Attachment 3 – Plan By Warkworth Surveyors with latest alignment from AT and slope information with 50 metre earthworks sediment control area
34 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Attachment 4 Detailed design still not started- work in the field still to commence From: Kimdon Nguyen (AT)
Hi Deb and Alastair
FYI, Marion has advised that she has not engaged an update on the valuations for your property just yet until we can confirm the design philosophy for the bridge. We have a workshop planned with our detailed designers in early December, so we will be able to confirm the approach for the valuers then. If you recall we are debating whether or not we will be doing a single span or three span bridge.
Also, our detailed designers have indicated that they would like to undertake additional topographical surveys of the streams and also some geotechnical investigations around the planned bridge piles/abutements, depending on the outcomes of the design meetings.
The geotechnical work and surveys would likely be planned in January 2019. At this stage, we are thinking of a window between Jan 14th and 25th, depending on weather and your availability. We would confirm the time and duration later this year once they’ve confirmed their requirements.
I understand that this may be a busy time for you and your family, therefore I wanted to see if there was any issues with undertaking further investigations on your property so close to the holiday periods.
Are you able to confirm if this period is suitable for you? Or alternatively propose another period which would suit you and your family best.
Kind regards
733 Attachment 5 Explanatory Email on vegetation removal rules in the Future Urban Zone within Riparian Margins for Margin width
35 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
I guess it may be open to a contrary view but based on the “H18.1 Zone description” I would say they would be rural streams until the urban zoning is determined.
H18.1. Zone description The Future Urban Zone is applied to greenfield land that has been identified as suitable for urbanisation. The Future Urban Zone is a transitional zone. Land may be used for a range of general rural activities but cannot be used for urban activities until the site is re- zoned for urban purposes.
Dan Rodie | Principal Specialist – Planning North-West Resource Consenting Unit – Resource Consents Department Auckland Council | DDI Ph 09 427 3299 | Mobile 021 826 067, Orewa Office, Level 1, Pacific Building, 50 Centreway Road, Orewa Visit our website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
From: Karen Pegrume < > Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 4:07 PM To: Dan Rodie
Vegetation removal in a riparian yard E15. Within the future Urban Zone The vegetation rules state 10 metres (protection)for urban streams and 20 for Rural. Is it an urban stream or a rural stream?
From: Dan Rodie [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 2:41 PM To: Karen Pegrume < > Subject: RE: Future Urban Riparian Margins..
Hi Karen,
Not sure of the context of your query? The land use rules that apply to the FUZ address riparian and coastal yards, see table below. Most 734 subdivision in the FUZ is a non-complying activity so the standards don’t apply apart from in relation to Table E39.4.1 or E39.4.3, is that the basis of the question?
36 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Regards Dan
H18 Future Urban Zone Table H18.6.3.1 Yards
Dan Rodie | Principal Specialist – Planning 735 North-West Resource Consenting Unit – Resource Consents Department Auckland Council | DDI Ph 09 427 3299 | Mobile 021 826 067,
37 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
Orewa Office, Level 1, Pacific Building, 50 Centreway Road, Orewa Visit our website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
From: Karen Pegrume < > Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 11:41 AM To: Dan Rodie
Hi Dan Can you please clarify- is the riparian margin 10 or 20 metres in the Future Urban Zone. My take is it is still rural land so would be 20, but I may be wrong. It forms part of a submission due in Tomorrow.
Regards Karen
CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. We do not accept responsibility for any viruses or similar carried with our email, or any effects our email may have on the recipient computer system or network. Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Council.
Attachment 6 Traffic Assessment of effects on 245 Matakana Road Report by HG Traffic Engineer
736
38 |Submission to Matakana Link Road Notice of Requirement and Regional Consent south by Auckland Transport. Version 2 fully notified application. 11/29/2018 By Better Living Landscapes LTD on behalf of the White Light Family Trust.
737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745
245 MATAKANA ROAD, MATAKANA
TO: HG PROJECT NO : FROM: DATE:
1.0 INFORMATION PROVIDED
2.0 ACCESS
Page 1 of 3 746 3.0 MODELLING CONCERNS
Page 2 of 3 747 4.0 SAFETY CONCERNS
Page 3 of 3 748 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3192] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:00:34 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Karl Moreton
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212862601
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 10 Rangitoto Terrace Auckland Auckland 0620
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: To emphasis 4 lanes are needed, as are roundabouts, and that it should be a tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Akld Council/AT are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing of $89m already signed off on - this is based on unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the unitary plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The 4 lanes and pathways should be built as originally modeled There should be a flexible tender process for contractors to quote on different permutations of lanes and pathways, but the land needs to be purchased for 4 lanes and pathways Have roundabouts instead of traffic lights
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
749 Supporting information:
750 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3088] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 7:00:35 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Kenneth Matthew Hunter
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274491054
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 60 Hill St Warkworth Warkworth 0910
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The 4 lane aspect
What are the reasons for your submission? With the rapid growth and popularity of the area it is a no brainer to build 4 lanes, now than to find out in a couple years that it wasn't a good decision to take the wait and see attitude.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Build 4 lanes now and be ready for future growth of the area. Costs to add another 2 lanes at a later date will only escalate and funding even harder to find.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
751 752 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3284] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 8:15:11 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Kerri Patricia Meuli
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: +64021666021
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 1B/28 Market Place, The Parc Auckland Auckland 1010
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Matakana Link Road
What are the reasons for your submission? Travel Omaha to Auckland every day and the sooner the Puhoi to Warkworth motorway and the link road are completed , the better.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Build the link road as soon as possible
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
753 754 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3205] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:45:34 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Kim Bennett
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021489450
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 27 Paraoa Crescent Omaha Auckland 0629
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
755 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
756 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3294] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 10:30:47 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Les Fejos
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021467228
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 14 Darrch Slope Omaha Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
757 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
758 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3102] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Monday, 19 November 2018 6:15:48 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Liz Sharek
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 02102513552
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 28 Tamahunga Drive RD5, Warkworth Warkworth Auckland 0985
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the building of a 4 lane Matakana Link Road and therefore the purchase of the land accordingly.
What are the reasons for your submission? A four lane road, built now, is absolutely necessary for the future development of Warkworth and it's infrastructure.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? 4 lane road now
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
759 760 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3271] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 12:00:21 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Luis Casas-Peschard
Organisation name: NA
Contact phone number: 094788890
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 8 Galaxy Drive Mairangi Bay Auckland 0630
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes roundabouts Tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? AC/AT chaanging their decision to do a 4 lane road
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Constrict 4 lanes as originally modelled.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
761 762 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3098] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Friday, 16 November 2018 6:00:49 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Lynn Mellsopp
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0272868625
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 96 Frost road Leigh R.D. 5 Warkworth 0985
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Staging of the Proposed Road
What are the reasons for your submission? We need this road as soon as possible, but it needs to be 4 lanes.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? I support the submission. BUT I comment that 4 lanes will be required within a few years at the latest. Economically it is best to build the final design all at once. Otherwise there will be significant disruption when the additional 2 lanes are required as well as duplication of design, administration, and construction costs. It will be needed within a very short time. I suggest that the road be built with 4 lanes, not in 2 stages. A second best (but still hugely less economic) scenario would be: 1. to build 4 lanes along the Western half in Stage 1 to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the Industrial zone which will be built within the next few years, and to allow better clearance of Southbound traffic on the present State Highway 1, and: 2. the roundabout at Matakana Road needs to be to the Stage 2 design now (2 lanes around the roundabout), allowing better flow of Southbound traffic heading towards Warkworth or North and the new motorway to flow better. Traffic is often built up from the Hill Street intersection to beyond
763 this point now, and that doesn't take into account that a large number of residents from Leigh, Matakana, Omaha etc do not travel to or through Warkworth unless they have to, and the many visitors and tourists who just don't come up here. Future developers' contributions of adjoining properties should be tagged to help pay off the additional costs of building the 4 lanes now.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
764 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3190] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:00:32 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Jillian Elizabeth Heath Stone
Organisation name: Mackenzie Country Trust
Contact phone number: 0274909188
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 24 Meiklejohn Way Auckland Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. THE MLR, AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION, IS CRITICAL, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PUHOI TO WARKWORTH MOTORWAY, AND MUCH NEEDED. The aspects I am submitting on are: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
765 Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
766 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3295] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 11:00:44 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: margaret florence collie
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0211648195
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 501/18 st martins lane grafton auckland 1010
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
767 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
768 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3227] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:45:33 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Mark Brighouse
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021711547
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 63 point wells road point wells auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 Lanes v 2 Lanes
What are the reasons for your submission? Council are underestimating the likely growth in the resident population, tourism activity and commerce in the region after Ara Tūhono (Pūhoi to Wellsford) highway is completed. Two lanes will be insufficient to cope with traffic volume increases on a route that has no obvious alternatives.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? I would like council to construct the four lanes and pathways in 2019-2021 and not delay them until 2036-2046.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
769 Supporting information:
770 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3187] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:45:35 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Mark Richard Bower
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021898987
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 147192 Ponsonby Auckland 1144
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
771 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
772 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3193] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:00:42 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Mark Douglas
Organisation name: Martin Personnel Ltd
Contact phone number: 021495513
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 62-547 Greenlane Auckland 1546
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 Lanes V 2 Lanes Roundabout v Traffic lights Tendering Process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council and Auckland Transport are changing their decision on the costed $89m 4 lane road already signed off based on unrealistic modelling of the growth in Warkworth under the unitary plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes instead of 2 as originally costed and approved. Create access to the motorway and the new industrial sites by roundabouts not traffic lights. Have a flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes and pathways, 4 lanes without pathways, 2 lanes and pathways and 2 lanes and no pathways but in all cases purchase land to allow for 4 lanes and pathways irrespective of the decision of what to build. And council needs to estimate and publicize the cost of retrofitting the extra lanes at a later date and the effects of the traffic chaos that will be encountered in the short term should the wrong option (2 lanes) be taken.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
773 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
774 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3133] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Sunday, 25 November 2018 11:30:44 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: MARTIN ROLAND DANCY
Organisation name: OMAHA BEACH COMMUNITY INC
Contact phone number: 021837383
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 424 WHITMORE ROAD MATAKANA RD6 AUCKLAND 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES V 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS V TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING $89 M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN .
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS. ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
775 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
776 Submission no 2
From: NoticeOfRequirementOnlineSubmissionForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Sent: Friday, 16 November 2018 7:31 AM To: Unitary Plan Subject: [ID:42] Notice of Requirement online submission - Simon Barclay
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Simon Barclay
Organisation name: Matakana Community Group
Full name of your agent: Simon Barclay
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number:
Postal address: 11 Ward Road RD 5 Warkworth Warkworth 0985
Submission details
Name of requiring authority: Auckland Transport
The designation or alteration: Matakana Link Road
The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: The provision of a 4 lane road (2 each way), which can be provided under the current budget but only if AT uses the help of local contractors in the design and build process
Do you support or oppose the Notice of Requirement? I or we support the Notice of Requirement
The reason for my or our views are: The community requires a 4 lane link road to avoid a repeat of the traffic issues at the Whangaparoa exit in SH1 and Hill St. The current issues with budget are largely due to a disconnect between the community contractors and the AT designers, the former understanding what can be done locally and the latter designing "gold plated" projects
I or we seek the following recommendation or decision from Auckland Council: Continue with the 4 lane road as originally planned, with the use of community contractors and liaison with the community
Submission date: 16 November 2018
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration 1 777 Submission no 2 I accept and agree that:
by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public, I or we must serve a copy of the submission on the person who gave the notice of requirement as soon as reasonably practicable after submitting to Auckland Council.
2 778 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3260] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 8:45:09 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Michael Dowd
Organisation name: Please select
Contact phone number: +64212888128
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 7 St Anne Place RD6 Warkworth Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes versus 2 lanes Roundabout vs Traffic Lights Tendering Process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council / Auckland Transport are changing their decision on an already signed off decision of 4 lane costing of $89M. This change is based on a new unrealistic model which ignores the forecasted growth of Warkworth the Unitary plan.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes & pathways as originally modelled Access to Motorway & New Industrial Block by Roundabout not traffic lights Flexible tender process enabling tenderers to quote on 4 Lanes & pathways 4 Lanes & no pathways 2 Lanes & pathways 2 Lanes & no pathways Purchase land now for 4 Lanes & pathways Estimate cost of retrofit & traffic chaos in short term if option 1 not chosen
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
779 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
780 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3090] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 9:15:31 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Michael Thomas
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274959500
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 38 Campbell rd Campbell’s Beach Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The proposed rd is too narrow
What are the reasons for your submission? A 4 lane road is essential to future proof this investment
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Go back to the original proposal for a 4 lane road
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
781 782 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3076] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 10:45:53 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Mike Francis
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021353176
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: c/o Leigh General Store, Hauraki Road Leigh Auckland 0947
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: the entire project
What are the reasons for your submission? support of the project with some areas for consideration
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Approve the project but remove the gold plated aspects for this stage of the construction and ensure that the 4 lane road is built in the first stage.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
783 784 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3230] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 12:05:10 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: MIKE PREBBLE
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021934152
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P O Box 90-352 AUCKLAND CENTRAL AUCKLAND CENTRAL 1142
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes v 2 lanes Roundabouts v Traffic lights Tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council/Auckland Transport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing of a $89m already signed off on, based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the unitary plan.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? - Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled - Access to motorway and new industrial sites by roundabouts not traffic lights - Flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes and pathways, 4 lanes no pathways, 2 lanes and pathways, 2 lanes and no pathways but in all cases purchase land forte 45 lanes and pathways. - Estimate cost of retrofit and traffic chaos in short term if option one not chosen
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
785 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
786 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3282] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 5:45:10 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Mohammed Faris Azimullah
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021485021
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 19 Tohora Crescent Omaha Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
787 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
788 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3239] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 3:15:37 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Murray James BEATSON
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021741391
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 18 Inanga Lane Omaha RD6 Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: WE SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. THE MLR, AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION, IS CRITICAL, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PUHOI TO WARKWORTH MOTORWAY, AND MUCH NEEDED.
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The aspects of the application I am submitting on are ... 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS I would like to see the following decisions and amendments made by Council ... CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS
789 ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
790 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3236] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 2:30:38 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Murray Ward
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: +64274955645
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 34A Beach Road Auckland Auckland 0620
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
791 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
792 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3101] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Monday, 19 November 2018 8:45:50 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Nadia Els
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0211051219
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 368B Mahurangi East Road, Snells Beach, Auckland 0920 Snells Beach Auckland 0920
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The number of lanes
What are the reasons for your submission? Two lanes is not sufficient, it will continue crippling traffic for both commuters and businesses with the huge amount of development and growth going on. Four lanes is the only way to make it work.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The latest proposal includes downgrading from four to two lanes. I'd like this to be amended to four lanes.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
793 Supporting information:
794 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3226] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:31:10 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Nigel Tse
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021656318
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 74233 Greenlane Auckland 1546
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Support 4 lanes with a roundabout
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Progress and construct the 4 lane carriageway with a roundabout
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
795 796 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3274] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 12:15:16 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: noel coom
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: +6421890955
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 2/14 Otakau Road Auckland Auckland 0620
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The Matakana link Road as part and parcel of the new Puhoi to Warkworth motorway extension is essential and sensible. My support is for 4 lanes and not two lanes and my preference is for roundabouts and not traffic lights.
What are the reasons for your submission? I am a home owner at Omaha and have witnessed the fast growth of this region and foresee that very quickly Warkworth and its catchment settlements will become a satellite town and with its suburbs a key area of greater Auckland. The original decision was for 4 lanes and considering the projected growth ( which will exceed projection) building 4 lanes from the outset seems prudent and will surely prove most cost effective.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modeled. Access by way of roundabouts. Flexibility in the tendering process and end ensuring they provide for the optimal solution and not short terms "accountants" planning decisions.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
797 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
798 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3216] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:45:34 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Oliver Wills
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212768559
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 68a Tarawera Terrace Auckland Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
799 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
800 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3211] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:01:03 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Pat Carrigan
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021944739
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 2 Kotiri Street St Heliers St Heliers 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 Lanes vs 2 lanes Roundabouts vs Traffic Lights Tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland council/AucklandTransport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing of $89m already signed off on,based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the unitary plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled. Access to motorway and new Industrial sites by roundabouts not traffic lights
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
801 Supporting information:
802 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3240] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 3:30:43 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Paul Head
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021574062
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 3 Patiki Place, Omaha beach Omaha, Warkworth Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
803 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
804 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3235] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 2:00:39 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Paul Heiplik
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021 998 001
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 17 Taumata Road Omaha Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: THE MLR, AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION, IS CRITICAL, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PUHOI TO WARKWORTH MOTORWAY, AND MUCH NEEDED.
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
805 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
806 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3279] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 3:30:12 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Paul Robert King
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 094227359
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 54 MANGATAWHIRI ROAD WARKWORTH WARKWORTH 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 Lanes vs 2 Lanes Roundabouts vs Traffic Lights Tendering Process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council / Auckland Transport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing of $98M already signed off, based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the unitary plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modeled. Access to motorway and new industrial sites by roundabouts, not traffic lights. Flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes, no pathways, 4 lanes and pathways, 2 lanes and pathways, 2 lanes and no pathways but all cases purchase land for 4 lanes and pathways. Estimated cost to retrofit and traffic choas in short term if option one not chosen
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
807 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
808 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3219] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:45:39 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Peggy Lowe
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212948299
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 17 Landscape Road Mt Eden Auckland 1024
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The MLR and the timing of completion is critical and a high priority, together with the new Puhoi to Warkworth motorway. Retain 4 Lanes as opposed to 2 lanes Install rounabouts instead of traffic lights Follow a tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council/ Auckland Transport have changed their original decision on the 4 lane costing of $89M which had already been signed off, based on a new unrealistic model despite the projected growth of Warkworth under the Unitary Plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled Provide access to motorway and new industrial sites by roundabouts, not traffic lights Flexible tendering process for contractors to quote on: 4 lanes & pathways; 4 lanes and no pathways; 2 lanes & pathways; 2 lanes & no pathways; - in all cases purchase land to future proof for the 4 lanes and pathways
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
809 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
810 Submission no 9
From: NoticeOfRequirementOnlineSubmissionForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Sent: Friday, 23 November 2018 8:45 AM To: Unitary Plan Subject: [ID:50] Notice of Requirement online submission - Peter Hogg
The following customer has submitted a Notice of Requirement online submission.
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Peter Hogg
Organisation name:
Full name of your agent: Hogg
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number:
Postal address: 24 Oak River Drive RD 5 Warkworth Auckland 0985
Submission details
Name of requiring authority: Auckland Transport
The designation or alteration: Matakana Link Road
The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: The need to see this project advance from a mere "wish" to reality. Due to the rapid development of the local areas of Matakana, Omaha, Point Wells Leigh and beyond this link road needs to become an essential part of the infrastructure that is necessary to support the development already permitted by the Territorial Authority
Do you support or oppose the Notice of Requirement? I or we support the Notice of Requirement
The reason for my or our views are: The process seems to be a fair and understandable requirement
I or we seek the following recommendation or decision from Auckland Council: That the due process be followed but instigated with a realistic time frame to ensure that it actually does happen. Further outlying development of residential areas needs this project for reasonable acces to the areas
Submission date: 23 November 2018
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
1 811 Submission no 9 I accept and agree that:
by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public, I or we must serve a copy of the submission on the person who gave the notice of requirement as soon as reasonably practicable after submitting to Auckland Council.
2 812 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3223] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:15:34 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: PETER MACLEOD
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021439977
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 199 BLEAKHOUSE ROAD AUCKLAND AUCKLAND 2014
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: - number of lanes - roundabouts vs lights - tender process
What are the reasons for your submission? I am not happy with the change of decision proposed to the costing of the 4 lane proposal. It seems unrealistic and ignores the growth that provided for in the auckland Unitary Plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
813 If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
814 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3185] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:45:33 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Peter Pettit
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021982822
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 6 Ingram Rd Remuera Auckland 1050
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
815 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
816 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3275] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 12:30:10 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Peter Thomas
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021816261
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 102 Omaha Drive Omaha Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: - 4 lanes vs 2 lanes - Roundabout vs traffic lights - Tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Both Auckland Council and Transport are changing the decisioning on the 4 lane to reduce to 2 lanes
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? - Construct the 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled. - Use of roundabouts rather than traffic lights. - Enable tender process to cover different configuration scenarios. Land purchase and base build/earthworks needs to be for 4 lanes, but delivery of physical sealed lanes could be scalable
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
817 Supporting information:
818 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3070] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 13 November 2018 8:30:35 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Phil Hadfield
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 09 945 2956
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 8 Rural View Lane Warkworth Warkworth 0910
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The proposal for the Matakana link road is a good one, however I believe that the proposed two- lane road will not meet the demands of the local area. The original proposal for a four-lane road is far more sensible.
What are the reasons for your submission? It is unlikely that a two-lane road will be able to cope with the demands of the immediate area when it is developed as an industry hub. A four-lane road will be more cost effective in the long term. Implementing in one phase of work will be less disruptive.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Revert to a four-lane road.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
819 Supporting information:
820 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3297] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 3:45:44 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Philip Joseph Molloy
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021 275 7982
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 62635, Greenlane Auckland, 1546
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 Lanes, with roundabouts,
What are the reasons for your submission? With the growth in the area it is wporth maximising the opportunity now.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? 4 lanes
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
821 822 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3233] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 12:30:42 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Philip Winstone
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274 999 581
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 99253 Newmarket Auckland 1149
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: The MLR and the timing of its completion is critical to the ability of people driving from the east of Warkworth presently and in coming years given the projected population increases in the wider district. Warkworth's population alone is projected to increase from 5000 to 25,000. The MLR needs to be dovetailed in with completion of the Puhoi to Warkworth motorway. Given the existing traffic congestion and population projections. 1. the MLR must be 4 lanes from the start, not the revised proposal to 2 lanes. 2. Tendering process. Tenderers are being asked to quote on a gilt edged spec. As a local contractor said at a recent meeting held at the Bridgehouse, let the engineers and contractors draw up a specification for the 4 lane road. The much of the contingency ( is it $40) will disappear
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Council and Auckland Council are changing their decision to build a 4 lane $89million road, instead making the MLR two lanes plus footpaths and cycleways
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? 1.Construct a 4 lane MLR as originally planned 2.Access to the motorway and new industrial estate by roundabouts, not traffic lights. 3. Adopt a flexible tender process, 4 lanes plus pathways,
823 4 lanes no path and cycle ways. 4. Ensure land is purchased for 4 lanes regardless of the out come.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
824 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3066] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 6 November 2018 9:00:51 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Graeme Beals
Organisation name: Point Wells Citizens and Ratepayers Association
Contact phone number: 027 203 7682
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 16B Waimanu Place, Point Wells, RD6, Warkworth 0986 Point Wells Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: We urge the Council to insist on a t least a 3 lane minimum, with the centre lane being reversible if 3 lanes are built rather than 4.
What are the reasons for your submission? In summer there is intense traffic at certain times in different directions, such that it can take hours to get into our out of the Matakana region. Growth will only worsen that situation. A reversible centre lane would be a cheaper alternative than four lanes, but would harness many of its values to the area.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Approve the Application only if it is three or more lanes.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
825 Supporting information:
826 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3243] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 4:45:39 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Richard Harris
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021775898
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 46 294, Herne Bay Auckland 1147
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes versus 2 lanes Roundabouts vs Traffic Lights Tendering Process
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
827 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
828 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3177] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Monday, 26 November 2018 4:00:43 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Richard Holden
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021928222
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P.O. Box 28488 Remuera Auckland 1541
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Needs to be a 4 lane road as previously decided
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The area requires a 4 Lane road as previously decided and agreed too
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
829 830 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3276] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 2:45:12 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: richard patrick Longdon
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021503114
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 195 Omaha Drive(PO BOX 297 Matakana 09480 OMAHA auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes vs 2 lanes roundabouts tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland council/Auckland Transport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing of $89 m already signed off on, based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of Warkworth under the unitary plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? 4lanes and pathways as originally modelled access to motorway and industrial sites by ROUNDABOUT,NOT traffic lights Flexible tender process for contractors to quote on4 lanes and pathways,2 lanes and no pathways,2lanes &pathways,BUT in all cases purchase land for 4 lanes and pathways.True estimation of retro fit andTRAFFIC CHAOSif option 1 not taken
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at
831 the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
832 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3105] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 7:46:04 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Sandra Cathrine Winger
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0223597295
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 58 Clinton Rd RD6 Campbells Beach Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the original 4 lane road with cycle/ walkways.
What are the reasons for your submission? The obvious reason of huge and only increasing volume of traffic using the present road which causes long traffic delays at certain times.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? To go back to the original plan of a 4 lane road.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
833 From: Diana Bell (AT) To: Kimdon Nguyen (AT); Heather Horgan Subject: FW: Matakana link road Date: Wednesday, 5 December 2018 8:52:22 AM
From: Sandy Meharry
Hi Diana,
My apologies I seemed to have missed the close off for submissions to this application which closed 29th November - I did however submit towards the first round and even attended the meeting:) I live in Clayden Road, just before the proposed round about to the new Link Road and so am very keen to keep in touch with progress and how it will positively benefit both my family and the close and wider community. I just wanted to let you know my family and I very much support the inclusion of cycle ways and walk-ways, as a way to move towards a better more healthy future for NZ. Although traffic can congest on Sundays and Holidays with returning holiday makers- in general the traffic is fairly easy going and I would support a 2 lane road as been well adequat to cope with traffic, especially when the motorway bypasses traffic from Warkworth and the Hill street intersection gets upgraded and modernised. I believe roads promote cars and a four lane road would just breed more cars - let's invest into public transport and cycling etc, plus the overall vision for future infrastructure and circle roads of Warkworth. I wish you all the best with the project moving forward and look forward to cycling to the swimming pool at the Show Grounds and into town :)
Thank you for recieving my email and apologies for its lateness. HOPEFULLY IT CAN STILL HELP!
Yours sincerely Sandra Meharry and family
Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Auckland Transport.
834 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3095] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 9:30:35 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Sarah Gunn
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0223956756
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 11 Hexham Street Warkworth Warkworth 0910
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I am in favour of the proposed plan.
What are the reasons for your submission? The current infrastructure does not support the volume of traffic to the area during weekends and holidays.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Make the road four lanes
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
835 836 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3100] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Sunday, 18 November 2018 5:15:33 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: sb
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 09444111
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 68 bob street nl akl 1123
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: for
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? nil
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
837 838 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3081] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 6:15:46 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Sharron Marshall
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0211404836
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 57 Victoria Street Warkworth Warkworth 0910
Submission details
This submission: opposes the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Do not agree with 2 lanes.
What are the reasons for your submission? Do 4 lanes from start to ease congestion in a busy, growth area and tourist area. Long overdue in this area.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Take off bells and whistles. Add cycle lane in the future but get the roading future proofed to 4 lanes. This will help the local businesses and residents with traffic flow.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
839 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3083] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 7:00:44 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Shauna Thorburn
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021403360
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 471a wyllie road Warkworth Auckland 0981
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes are required
What are the reasons for your submission? It impacts our day to day life
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? To make the road 4 lanes from the outset
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
840 From: NoticeOfRequirementOnlineSubmissionForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2018 8:30 PM To: Unitary Plan Subject: [ID:41] Notice of Requirement online submission - Shelley Anne Trotter
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Shelley Anne Trotter
Organisation name:
Full name of your agent:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number:
Postal address: 591 Sandspit Rd RD2 Warkworth Auckland 0982
Submission details
Name of requiring authority: Auckland Transport
The designation or alteration: Matakana Link Road
The specific provisions that my submission relates to are:
Do you support or oppose the Notice of Requirement? I or we support the Notice of Requirement
The reason for my or our views are: We need this road as soon as possible.
I or we seek the following recommendation or decision from Auckland Council: Secure the land for our future four lanes and if at all possible build all four now. Secure the land for walking and cycling access.
Submission date: 13 November 2018
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
I accept and agree that:
1 841 Submission no 1 by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public, I or we must serve a copy of the submission on the person who gave the notice of requirement as soon as reasonably practicable after submitting to Auckland Council.
2 842 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3096] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 9:45:34 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Sheryll Frances Keane
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021999653
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 6 Rivendell Place Warkworth Auckland 0910
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: This link road is vital for traffic flows from the end of motorway extension and also to reduce pressure on the Hill St intersection.
What are the reasons for your submission? I believe it should be 4 lanes and include a walk/cycle way. To suggest this can be added later is folly. The surrounding area is planned for development of housing, industrial centre and even schools. What chaos would ensue if it was done when all that is in place?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? See above comments
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
843 Supporting information:
844 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3093] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 8:45:29 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Simon Robert Demler
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0210656969
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 89 Omaha Valley Road Big Omaha Auckland 0985
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the building of the Matakana Link Road. However the road should specify four lanes not two.
What are the reasons for your submission? Communities east of Warkworth are very poorly served for roading infrastructure. It is important that when investments are made that they are built in a way that supports the future. Traffic demand in the Warkworth area clearly shows that four lanes will be necessary sooner than expected. The council (and Its unelected quango Auckland Transport) must honour the original commitments made to the community.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Restore the Matakana Link Road to four lanes.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at
845 the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
846 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3094] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 9:15:35 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Simon Watts
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0221239814
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 24 Richmond Avenue Northcote Point Auckland 0627
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: All
What are the reasons for your submission? Interested in economical development of region
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Increase road from 2 to 4 lanes
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
847 848 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3210] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:00:37 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Stephen Crockett
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021672795
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 265 Omaha Drive, Warkworth RD6 Auckland Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: link road should be four lanes not two.
What are the reasons for your submission? With the ever increasing permanent residents commuting to the City and day trvellers to the beaches and national parks in the area then a two lane link road woud be just another traffic nightmare. Similar t what we have at the Hill Street intersection at the present time.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Makr the Matakana Link Rd FOUR Lnes.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
849 850 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3259] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 7:45:09 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Stephen Gutmann
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021957504
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Bo 47 017 Ponsonby Auckland 1011
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes vs. 2 lanes, and roundabouts vs. traffic lights
What are the reasons for your submission? We regularly travel between Omaha and Warkworth and peak traffic is horrendous
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The existing 2 lane road can't cope with the volume hence a new road of 4 lands would be preferred. Roundabouts ensure a better traffic flow than traffic lights.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
851 852 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3232] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 12:30:32 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Stephen M Hamilton
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021924275
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 29 Mahoe Avenue Remuera Auckland 1050
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: SUPPORT THE APPLICATION. HOWEVER, THE MLR, AND THE TIMING OF ITS COMPLETION, IS CRITICAL. IT DOES NOT STAND ALONE, IT MUST BE VIEWED AS A 'PACKAGE' TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PUHOI TO WARKWORTH MOTORWAY. BOTH ARE ESSENTIAL. ASPECTS SPECIFICALLY BEING SUBMITTED; 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? As a dual resident of Rodney & Auckland City I use this road for business and family. AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT appear to have changing their minds and walked-back on already signed-off funding-commitment of $89M. their decision making has used modelling that is at best unrealistic and fails to fully acknowledge the projected growth in the Warkworth region (particularly under the new Unitary Plan).
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The 4 lane highway with pathways as modeled at the outset. Access to motorway and new industrial park via roundabout (not lights from the outset). Land MUST be purchased for the 4- Lane option with pathways. Flexible tenders should be sought for 4-Lane with path, 4 Lane
853 without paths, 2-Lane with &n without paths. If the 4-lane option is not pursued, the economic impact of the traffic bottlenecks should be modeled and tabled with the proposal. The retrofit of adding lanes should also be financially-modeled and presented with any 'slimmed-down' option (so that decision-makers and elected officials can be held-accountable).
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
854 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3085] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 9:45:44 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Stephen Michael Reynolds
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274787427
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P.O. Box 677 Warkworth Warkworth 0941
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes
What are the reasons for your submission? Concerned financial cut backs have been made and money moved to the city rail link.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Make sure it’s 4 lanes wide Make sure it connects to Sandspit road link
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
855 856 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3186] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:45:34 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Terry Anderson
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212280070
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: PO Box 303161 Rosedale Auckland 0751
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Roundabouts
What are the reasons for your submission? Traffic flow
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Access should be via roundabouts The predominance of peak traffic is at quite defined times i.e. Friday afternoon/Saturday morning, and Sunday afternoon. Traffic lights unnecessarily hinder smooth traffic flow for the other 90%
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
857 858 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3089] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 8:45:30 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Terry Cornelius
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021825342
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 15/8 Tobago Place Sunnynook Auckland 0620
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: That the road go ahead but it must be increased to four lanes as originally planned.
What are the reasons for your submission? As a regular user of the Matakana I have experienced the almost continual congestion and tail backs on Matakana Rd. By making the loop road only 2 lanes this congestion will only be transferred to another point, not relieved.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? That the original plan to have 4 lanes be reinstated, and if cost savings are required they be achieved in areas other than reducing the number of lanes.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
859 Supporting information:
860 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3220] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:00:33 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Terry Tolich
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212221561
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 2A/381 Hibiscus Coast Highway Orewa Orewa 0931
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
861 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
862 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3087] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 6:15:35 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Tim Watts
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0275492894
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: [email protected] Matakana Auckland 0985
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: While I support the new link road in principle it can not go ahead unless it is 4 lanes. It is imperative this is done properly as originally planned. You can’t sustain this regional growth without it being support by adequate infrastructure spend - don’t let this area become like Queenstown. The cost difference in the build price should be able to be managed.
What are the reasons for your submission? I live in the area and use the existing road daily. The growth the area is experiencing means this is a very important issue. AT are making a big mistake wanting to do 2 lanes
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? The road needs to be 4 lanes as originally proposed. 2 lanes is not going to be acceptable
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
863 Supporting information:
864 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3268] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 11:30:09 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Tom Berkovits
Organisation name: Mr
Contact phone number: 021907867
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 126 LADIES MILE AUCKLAND AUCKLAND 1051
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
865 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
866 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3292] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 29 November 2018 9:15:44 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: tony gorton
Organisation name: Private citizen
Contact phone number: 021 971637
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 6 Kutai lane, Omaha Omaha Auckland 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes vrs 2 lanes Roundabouts vs Traffic lights Tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland Transport are changing there decision on the 4 lanes costing $89 million already signed off on, based on new unrealistic modelling despite growth of Warkworth
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled Access to motorway and new industrial sites by roundabouts not Traffic lights Estimate cost of retrofit and traffic chaos in short term if option one not chosen
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
867 Supporting information:
868 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3188] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 8:45:37 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Vadim Tarasoff
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212754040
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: Unit 11, 22 Killarney Street Takapuna Auckland 0622
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 LANES vs 2 LANES ROUNDABOUTS vs TRAFFIC LIGHTS TENDERING PROCESS
What are the reasons for your submission? AUCKLAND COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING OF $89M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON, BASED ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
869 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
870 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3074] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 9:45:45 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Verena Steele
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212123780
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 76 Falls Rd Warkworth Auckland 0984
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I believe it is very short sighted to 2 lane this road. I also have issues around the "cycle lane"..
What are the reasons for your submission? The traffic now is very heavy through Hill street, most of this will be going onto the main highway towards the new Motorway, essentially blocking off the lanes in the same way as now - at least 2 lanes each way will allow a larger number of traffic off/on to the main road more quickly.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? 4 lane the road and ensure that the very expensive "cycle lanes" have a continuation that is not making them cycle on SH1 or just allow for a future cycleway.. when the land is available for the links, presumably into Warkworth - thru Dome - and out to Matakana...
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
871 Supporting information:
872 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3082] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 7:00:42 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Victoria Joule
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212096705
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 190c Ahuroa Valley Road, RD1 Warkworth Auckland 0981
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the Matakana Link Road but I am in favour of 4 lanes
What are the reasons for your submission? Because we need better access to the different parts of our regions - particularly during NZs popular tourist seasons when the roading infrastructure is totally inadequate !
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? I would like the Council to make a decision in favour of 4 lanes for the Matakana Link Road
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
873 874 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3288] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 10:30:10 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Vivienne Louise Redding
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0212637807
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 20 Tohunga Crescent Parnell Auckland 1052
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Highway between State Highway 1 and Matakana
What are the reasons for your submission? We have a house at Omaha and travel up there every week. We have battled clogged roads for 15 years.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? We feel the Council should be planning for the future rather than be planning for immediate needs. Two lanes either way should seriously be considered.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
875 876 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3244] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 5:30:39 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Wallace Roy Maxwell Jackson
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 095758316
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 10 Kildare Ave St. Heliers Auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support 4 lanes
What are the reasons for your submission? Council are changing an already decidion
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Construct 4 lanes and foot path as originally planned
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
877 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3106] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Thursday, 22 November 2018 7:16:03 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Wayne drinnan
Organisation name: Drinnan Drive ltd
Contact phone number: 021457372
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: P.O. Box 584 Warkworth Auckland 0981
Submission details
This submission: is neutral regarding the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: I support the imediate building of the four lane link road. Not two lanes. If over budget reduce the cost by delaying the cycle way and foot paths.
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Just get on and build the four lane road as promised to the public. Change the way these jobs are tendered, use a pre design local contractor consultation.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
878 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3200] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:30:38 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Wayne Michael Mccarthy
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021422650
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 13 Riverside Dr, Point Wells Warkworth Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Number of lanes
What are the reasons for your submission?
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? This road needs to be two lanes each way. There is an increasing residential population in the catchment area for this road, as well as an expanding visitor population. Comments that the savings from making it a two lane road could be spent on cycle and walkways, does not take in to consideration that a large part of the current and future population will be using this road to commute to Auckland on the soon to be completed Puhoi motorway. Visitors to the wineries and other attractions will not be walking or cycling from Auckland airport; they will be using their cars and motorhomes. Along with an increase in population comes an increase in service and delivery vehicles. Lastly, every dollar saved now by making it only two lanes will cost the country two or more when it is upgraded to four lanes.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
879 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
880 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3073] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 9:45:50 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Will McKay
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: +64211122715
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 368B Mahurangi East Rd Snells Beach Auckland 0920
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes not 2
What are the reasons for your submission? Living and running local business we need 4 lanes to ensure as little disruption to traffic as possible
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Ensure 4 lanes are constructed for practicalities sake, don't waste money building a pretty 2 lane road
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
881 882 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3286] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 8:30:08 PM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Will Selles
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 021 425 444
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 29 John Stokes Terrace Remuera Auckland 1050
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 Lanes Vs 2 Lanes Roundabouts Vs Traffic Lights Tendering Process
What are the reasons for your submission? COUNCIL / AUCKLAND TRANSPORT ARE CHANGING THEIR DECISION ON THE 4 LANE COSTING $89 M ALREADY SIGNED OFF ON NEW UNREALISTIC MODELLING DESPITE THE GROWTH OF WARKWORTH UNDER THE UNITARY PLAN .
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? CONSTRUCT 4 LANES AND PATHWAYS AS ORIGINALLY MODELLED ACCESS TO MOTORWAY AND NEW INDUSTRIAL SITES BY ROUNDABOUTS NOT TRAFFIC LIGHTS FLEXIBLE TENDER PROCESS FOR CONTRACTORS TO QUOTE ON 4 LANES & PATHWAYS, 4 LANES NO PATHWAYS, 2 LANES & PATHWAYS , 2 LANES AND NO PATHWAYS BUT IN ALL CASES PURCHASE LAND FOR THE 4 LANES & PATHWAYS. ESTIMATE COST OF RETROFIT AND TRAFFIC CHAOS IN SHORT TERM IF OPTION ONE NOT CHOSEN.
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
883 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
884 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3191] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:00:34 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: William Freeth
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 094227323
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 21 Meiklejohn Way Omaha Beach Warkworth 0986
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Retain the 4 lane road proposal
What are the reasons for your submission? We always seem to be reactive rather than proactive in long term planning. In all of your considerations you seem to ignore the huge traffic volume generated by visitors going to Goat Island Reserve, Tawharanui Peninsular and beach, Kawau Island, Pakiri Beach, Matakana, Ti Point Walkway, the list goes on. All of this heavy at time traffic causes terrible delays in getting an ambulance for emergency , often life saving, and with the growth of greater Auckland, the Rescue Helicopter is covering a huge area from out at Great Barrier, through to say Raglan and at times Coromandel. St. Johns Ambulance will confirm these concerns.
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Retain the connector road as a 4 lane roadway, use roundabouts rather tha Traffic Control lights. Let commonsense make the decision, not simply the poor decisions which are always based upon false long term saving of money. Do it right the first time!! Please!!
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
885 Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? No
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: No
Supporting information:
886 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3212] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 10:00:43 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: william james swain
Organisation name:
Contact phone number: 0274595011
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 22b tarawera tce st heliers auckland 1071
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: 4 lanes vs 2 lanes roundabouts vs traffic lights tendering process
What are the reasons for your submission? Auckland council / Auckland transport are changing their decision on the 4 lane costing $89M already signed off on, based on new unrealistic modelling despite the growth of warkworth under the unitary plan
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? construct 4 lanes and pathways as originally modelled access to motorway and new industrial sites by roundabouts not traffic lights flexible tender process for contractors to quote on 4 lanes pathways, 4 lanes no pathways, 2 lanes and pathways, 2 lanes and no pathways but in all cases purchase land for 4 lanes and pathways
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at
887 the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
888 From: NotifiedResourceConsentSubmissionOnlineForm@donotreply.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz To: Resource Consent Admin Cc: Diana Bell (AT) Subject: [ID:3201] Submission received on notified resource consent Date: Tuesday, 27 November 2018 9:30:37 AM
We have received a submission on the notified resource consent for Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth.
Details of submission
Notified resource consent application details
Property address: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road Warkworth
Application number: BUN60328269
Applicant name: Auckland Transport
Applicant email: [email protected]
Application description: Auckland Transport has applied for a Notice of Requirement and the associated resource consents for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Matakana Link Road - Tūhonohono ki Tai (Pathway to the Sea) Project.
Submitter contact details
Full name: Winifred Ann Skinner
Organisation name: Individual
Contact phone number: 021 404055
Email address: [email protected]
Postal address: 189 Saint Andrew’s Rd Epsom Auckland 1022
Submission details
This submission: supports the application in whole or in part
Specify the aspects of the application you are submitting on: Original commencement date for 4 lanes with footpaths.Connected to Puhoi to Warkworth highway.
What are the reasons for your submission? Live also in the area Increasing congestion Growth of the matakana/Warkworth area makes original proposal a necessity
What decisions and amendments would you like the council to make? Flexible tendering process 4 lanes Footpaths Roundabouts NOT traffic lights
Are you a trade competitor of the applicant? I am not a trade competitor of the applicant.
Do you want to attend a hearing and speak in support of your submission? Yes
If other people make a similar submission I will consider making a joint case with them at the hearing: Yes
Supporting information:
889 890 ATTACHMENT 18
DISCUSSIONS WITH SUBMITTERS REGARDING INTERSECTIONS ACCESS
891
892 From: Alison Pye To: Alison Pye Subject: FW: Discussions with submitters re intersections /access Date: Thursday, 28 February 2019 12:51:03 PM
From: Kimdon Nguyen (AT)
Hi Alison
We have discussed with representatives for Goatley, WLC, 245 Matakana road (white light). This was to discuss access onto MLR and identify their proposed access points.
We intend to model these proposals and run it past NZTA to confirm their acceptance in principal. This will hopefully give the submitters some peace of mind regarding likely intersection locations and designs which would be acceptable to AT and NZTA in the future when they go for their consents.
Regards
Kimdon Nguyen | Principal Project Manager Major Projects | Integrated Networks 20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010 M 021 409 032 www.at.govt.nz cid:[email protected]
From: Alison Pye
Hi Diana
For accuracy in my report – can you please confirm who AT has met with and discussed access/intersection concerns raised in the submissions.
893 Thanks
Alison
Alison Pye | Principal Planner North, West and Islands Planning|Plans and Places MOB: +64 21 591 242 Auckland Council, Level 23, 135 Albert Street, Auckland
CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. We do not accept responsibility for any viruses or similar carried with our email, or any effects our email may have on the recipient computer system or network. Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Council.
Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Auckland Transport.
894 ATTACHMENT 19
RODNEY LOCAL BOARD COMMENT
895
896
Local Board Feedback on Publicly Notified Application: Land between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road, Warkworth
(includes: Resource Consents, Plan Changes, Notice of Requirements, Reserves Act process)
Date: 30 November 2018
Attention: Gemma Hayes
Form to be Resource Consents sent to:
Application BUN60328269; LUC60328290; DIS60328291; WAT60328292; reference: LUS60328463
Location: Between State Highway 1 and Matakana Road, Warkworth
Applicant: Auckland Transport
Brief summary of the proposal: A notified application for regional resource consents to construct, operate and maintain the Matakana link road.
Local Board Feedback: The Rodney Local Board provides the following feedback in relation to the notified application for regional resource consents to construct, operate and maintain the Matakana link road
The Rodney Local Board shares significant concerns, expressed by the Warkworth community, that the two lane (Stage 1) option will be inadequate by the time it is built. This will result in ongoing significant traffic congestion issues. At the completion of the proposed Stage 1 the new motorway will result in an increase in visitors to the area as it will be quicker and easier to visit places like Matakana and Omaha.
In addition to anticipated visitor growth there is also significant urban land release planned over the next two decades. Some of the first areas are scheduled to be released in the next 12 months. As the motorway will effectively reduce travel time this will make Warkworth a quicker trip to central Auckland, it will drive demand for local properties and further land for residential growth. As a
897 result, traffic numbers will increase overall.
The proposed Stage 1 (two lanes) will be impacted immediately by the proposed industrial park being developed to the north of the Matakana Link Road. This will result in an increase of slower moving heavy vehicles that will be turning into and out of the Industrial Park area and on to the proposed Matakana Link Road. Through traffic will need a dedicated lane or the intersection could quickly become congested. The future residential subdivisions will also require at least two major intersections. Based on current plans one intersection is proposed to be a roundabout, and the other a controlled intersection. These intersections need to be built to a four lane standard at the outset as they will be difficult, costly and disruptive to try to reconfigure at a later date.
There are additional subdivisions proposed along the Matakana Link Road length for both commercial and residential purposes, which again will require additional intersections. Turning traffic moving in and out of these subdivisions will cause congestion for through traffic travelling between the motorway off-ramp and Matakana in both directions. The bridge at the eastern end of the proposed new road should at least be built to a four lane standard from the outset. In the local board experience extending and widening bridges is an expensive and disruptive undertaking and planning for the future growth should take into account that potential from the outset.
Any congestion on the Matakana Link Road will result in queueing at busy times, which could reach all the way to and from the motorway. By staging the design as proposed (with Stage 1 due in 2021), and waiting for the demand before building the additional 2 lanes the proposed bypass effect of the new State Highway 1 will not be achieved. The development proposed will also support future increases in passenger transport services and the establishment of new routes in the wider Warkworth area.
The local board considers that the Warkworth Showgrounds will be impacted by increased traffic adjacent and around the Showgrounds and requests that consideration be given to the provision of another access/entrance off the Matakana Link Road. This will alleviate any congestion from vehicles entering and leaving the Showgrounds from the current entrance. As the premier sports ground in the north, including a future indoor multi-sports building that is to be built on the site, the increased numbers of users and visitors should be factored into future transport planning of the area.
The local board is very supportive of the walking and cycling infrastructure proposed as this will provide significant alternative options for residents and visitors to be active and this is a priority of the 2017 Local Board Plan. However, of concern is that the proposed infrastructure will not connect to any dedicated cycle-ways or footpaths nor to the Warkworth township. Matakana Road and also the current State Highway 1 have no cycle-ways or walkways currently, so creating the infrastructure that will provide a wider connected network is seen as a priority. Reducing the extent of the infrastructure on the northern side of the proposed new road, could then be applied to support and create the connections from the new Matakana Link Road back to Warkworth township. The local board would support this consideration as a priority.
The local board considers that the staged approach for delivering the Matakana Link Road is not a viable or ideal approach when the future growth signalled for the area is taken into account. Evidence of similar projects, that have taken a staged approach, clearly show that delays associated with planning, the physical building of future stages and securing necessary funding for future projects can add unnecessary and costly delays to the final outcomes. The proposed Notice of Requirement will not deal with traffic growth and therefore would have a negative effect on
898 residents and businesses in Warkworth, including visitors to the area.
The Rodney Local Board requests that the scope of the Notice of Requirement be amended to remove the stages as proposed and support the project being confirmed as a four lane road to adequately deal with the anticipated traffic effects. In addition, provision of a connected walking and cycling network from the proposed Matakana Link Road to Warkworth is a key priority.
The Rodney Local Board would like to speak to this feedback at any hearing on these applications.
Outcome sought by local board: Seeking amendment to the consent application or appropriate conditions.
Attendance at any Hearing: The Rodney Local Board seeks an opportunity to speak to this feedback at any hearing on this matter.
This feedback is authorised by: Phelan Pirrie, Deputy Chair, Rodney Local Board
Phelan Pirrie, Deputy Chair, Rodney Local Board Email: [email protected] Date: 30 November 2018
899 900 ATTACHMENT 20
EMAIL FROM DAVID NELSON REGARDING SHOWGROUNDS LINK
901
902 From: Alison Pye To: Gemma Hayes Subject: FW: MLR - Rodney Local Board discussions with AT for walkway cycle way linkage from MLR through the Warkworth Showgrounds Date: Thursday, 28 February 2019 2:08:42 PM
From: David Nelson (AT)
Thanks Kimdon
Also, we are at a detailed design stage for the Matakana works so at this stage the best approach is to make sure we don’t preclude the of the showgrounds path to be connected to the Matakana Link Path and support how we can to enable that to happen.
Thanks.
David.
From: Kimdon Nguyen (AT)
Hi Alison
Yes we have received a request from the RLB to discuss this. At this stage a meeting is planned in March.
Our position is that this is beyond the scope of the MLR project, and at this stage, we are not considering funding any cycleways through the showgrounds.
However we are willing to consider how our proposed design could link into future greenways to avoid any unnecessary rework.
Note, the information from the Local Board on their proposals is very limited. I envisage that the discussions will generally be that yes, the greenways (when constructed by the Local Board) could be connected to the MLR project.
903
Kimdon Nguyen | Principal Project Manager Major Projects | Integrated Networks 20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010 M 021 409 032 www.at.govt.nz
From: Alison Pye
HI Diana
904 I understand that the Rodney Local Board has been in discussions with AT about having a walking/cycling connection from the showgrounds to the MLR. These discussions are to progress greenways plans recently developed by the Rodney Local Board which you can view via this link - the one relevant to the MLR is ‘Puhoi to Pakiri Greenways - Local Paths Plan’ https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/about-auckland-council/how-auckland-council-works/local- boards/all-local-boards/rodney-local-board/Pages/rodney-local-board-plans-agreements-reports.aspx
Are you able to advise on the progress of these discussions and whether they have resulted in agreements?
Thanks
Alison Alison Pye | Principal Planner North, West and Islands Planning|Plans and Places MOB: +64 21 591 242 Auckland Council, Level 23, 135 Albert Street, Auckland
Go to ourauckland.nz/mysummer to create your summer play list.
CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. We do not accept responsibility for any viruses or similar carried with our email, or any effects our email may have on the recipient computer system or network. Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Council.
Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Auckland Transport.
905 906 ATTACHMENT 21
RECOMMENDED REGIONAL CONSENT CONDITIONS
907
908 Proposed Regional consent conditions reviewed and amended by Auckland Council Specialists
Proposed Conditions Auckland Transport Amendments Comments BUN60328269
These general conditions apply to all resource consents.
1. 1. The activity is to be carried out in general The activity is to be carried out in Removed the word “general” accordance with the plans and all information general accordance with the plans and submitted with the application, detailed below, and all all information submitted with the referenced by the Council as consent number BUN#: application, detailed below, and all referenced by the Council as consent a) Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by number BUN60328269, LUC60328290, Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018; DIS60328291, WAT60328292, b) Transport Assessment prepared by Jacobs LUS60328463. Limited, dated October 2018; Report references and additional c) Constructability assessment prepared by Andy information to be inserted. Wright Project Services Limited, dated
October 2018;
d) Geotechnical and Groundwater Assessment prepared by Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018 e) Ecological Effects Assessment prepared by Bioresearchers Limited, dated October 2018; f) Preliminary Site Investigation prepared by Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018; 909 g) Air Quality Assessment prepared by Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018; h) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by AECOM Limited, dated October 2018; i) Noise and Vibration Assessment prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics, dated October 2018; j) Archaeology Assessment prepared by Clough and Associates, dated October 2018; k) Stormwater Assessment Report prepared by AECOM Limited dated October 2018; Where there is a conflict between the documents listed above and the consent conditions, the conditions will prevail.
2. Consent Lapse 2. Under section 125 of the RMA, this consent will lapse five years after the date it is granted unless: a. The consent is given effect to; or b. On application, the Council extends the period after which the consent will lapse. For the avoidance of doubt, the stormwater management system will be constructed at Stage 1 to manage the full stormwater volume anticipated after the completion of Stage 2. The stormwater discharge consent will be given effect to at Stage 1, even
910 though stormwater volumes will increase with the completion of Stage 2. 3. Consents expiry Consents expiry 3. Pursuant to section 123 of the RMA, the consents In accordance with section 123 of the for streamworks (WAT#), ground dewatering and RMA, the consents for streamworks diversion (WAT#) and operational stormwater (LUS60328463), ground dewatering and diversion and discharge (DIS#) will expire 35 years diversion (WAT60328292) and from the date of the activities commencing. operational stormwater diversion and discharge ) will expire 35 years from the date of the activities commencing.
4. Monitoring charge Monitoring charge Inserted amount of monitoring fee 4. The consent holder is to pay the Council an initial The consent holder is to pay the Council consent compliance monitoring charge of $X (GST an initial consent compliance monitoring inclusive) plus any further monitoring charge(s) to charge of $990 (GST inclusive) plus any recover the actual and reasonable costs incurred to further monitoring charge(s) to recover ensure compliance with the conditions of these the actual and reasonable costs incurred consents. to ensure compliance with the conditions of these consents. Advice note: Advice note: The initial monitoring deposit is to cover the cost of inspecting the site, carrying out tests, reviewing The initial monitoring deposit is to cover conditions, updating files, etc., all being work to the cost of inspecting the site, carrying ensure compliance with the resource consents. In out tests, reviewing conditions, updating order to recover actual and reasonable costs, files, etc., all being work to ensure monitoring of conditions, in excess of those covered compliance with the resource consents. by the deposit, will be charged at the relevant hourly In order to recover actual and rate applicable at the time. The consent holder will be reasonable costs, monitoring of advised of the further monitoring charge(s). Only after conditions, in excess of those covered all conditions of the resource consent have been met, by the deposit, will be charged at the
911 will the Council issue a letter confirming compliance relevant hourly rate applicable at the at request by the consent holder. time. The consent holder will be advised of the further monitoring charge(s). Only after all conditions of the resource consent have been met, will the Council issue a letter confirming compliance at request by the consent holder.
5. Management plan and document certification Management plan and document It is considered that deemed process certification process approval is unnecessary and inappropriate for this consent. As 5. At least 20 working days prior to commencement Prior to the commencement of demonstrated in the technical of construction of any stage of the project or activity earthworks activity on the subject site, a assessment there is still a (whichever is relevant) the consent holder must finalised Erosion and Sediment Control significant amount of detail submit all relevant management plans and Plan (ESCP), shall be prepared in required that will have to be documentation required by these conditions to be general accordance with the application validated by Auckland Council. certified (unless otherwise specified in these documents referred to under condition 1, conditions) to the Council for the Council to certify and in accordance with Auckland that they comply or are consistent with the relevant Council’s Guideline Document 2016/005 consent condition(s). The consent holder shall Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for include with the submitted management plans details Land Disturbing Activities in the of engagement with iwi for the development of the Auckland Region (GD05) and shall plans. If the consent holder does not receive any include, but is not limited to: response from the Council within 10 working days of • specific erosion and the management plan being submitted for sediment control works certification, the consent holder will be deemed to for the earthworks have (location and certification and can commence the works, stage or dimensions, capacity) in activity. accordance with GD05; • supporting calculations and design drawings as
912 necessary; • details of construction methods; • monitoring and maintenance requirements; • catchment boundaries and contour information; and, • details relating to the management of exposed areas (e.g. grassing, mulching).
These finalised ESCP shall be submitted to the Team Leader – Compliance NW 1, Auckland Council, on [email protected]. No earthworks activity on the subject site shall commence until written confirmation from the Team Leader is provided that the ESCP is satisfactory.
Advice Note: In the event that minor amendments to the ESCP are required, any such amendments should be limited to the scope of this consent. Any amendments which affect the performance of the ESCP may require an application to be made in accordance 913 with section 127 of the RMA. Any minor amendments should be provided to the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW 1, Auckland Council, prior to implementation to confirm that they are within the scope of this consent. 6. At least 20 working days prior to Additional condition to certify commencement of construction of any plans prior to works stage of the project or activity (whichever commencing. is relevant) the consent holder must submit all relevant management plans and documentation required by these conditions to be certified (unless otherwise specified in these conditions) to the Council for the Council to certify that they comply or are consistent with the relevant consent condition(s). The consent holder shall include with the submitted management plans details of engagement with iwi for the development of the plans. No streamworks activity on the subject site shall commence until confirmation from the Team Leader -Compliance Monitoring NW1 is provided that the plans referred to in conditions 6, 7 and 8 are satisfactory. Prior to the commencement of 7. Additional condition to address earthworks at the site, a Chemical chemical treatment of sediment Treatment Management Plan shall be 914 laden run off. submitted for the written approval of the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW 1, Auckland Council. The plan shall include as a minimum:
a) Specific design details of the chemical treatment system based on a rainfall activated methodology for the site’s sediment retention ponds, decanting earth bunds, and any other impoundment systems; b) Monitoring, maintenance (including post storm) and contingency programme (including a record sheet); c) Details of optimum dosage (including assumptions); d) Results of initial chemical treatment trial; e) A spill contingency plan; and f) Details of the person or bodies that will hold responsibility for long term operation and maintenance of the chemical treatment system and the organisational structure which will support this system. 915 The Chemical Treatment 8. Management Plan referred to under condition 7 above, shall be implemented prior to the start of any earthworks at areas of the site where decanting earth bunds or the sediment retention pond are established. Advice Note: The CTMP may be based on existing CTMPs for the remaining Long Bay development with confirmation of treatment design dosage rates. In the event that minor amendments to the CTMP are required, any such amendments should be limited to the scope of this consent. Any amendments which affect the performance of the CTMP may require an application to be made in accordance with section 127 of the RMA. Any minor amendments should be provided to the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW 1, prior to implementation to confirm that they are within the scope of this consent. 9. 6. The management plans and documents to be The management plans and documents Revised condition to include submitted to the Council for certification under the to be submitted to the Council for ‘stormwater management plan’ above condition include: certification under the above condition 8 to provide some flexibility in the include: design approach, particularly for a) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP); 916 wetland 3. Plan will also need to b) Streamworks Management Plan (SMP); c) Streamworks Offsetting Plan (SOP); a) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan address long term operation and (ESCP); maintenance. d) Restoration Planting Plan (RPP); b) Streamworks Management Plan e) Native Lizard Management Plan (NLMP); and (SMP); f) Kauri Dieback Management Plan (KDMP) c) Streamworks Offsetting Plan (SOP); g) Chemical Treatment Management Plan (CTMP). d) Restoration Planting Plan (RPP); e) Native Lizard Management Plan (NLMP); and f) Kauri Dieback Management Plan (KDMP) g) Chemical Treatment Management Plan (CTMP). h) Stormwater Management Plan
10. Management plan revisions At any time, the consent holder is Comments, as above for entitled to update or to revise any deemed approvals. 6. At any time, the consent holder is entitled to management plans, required to be update or to revise any management plans, required Removing word material to certified by the Council, including for a to be certified by the Council, including for a new include any change that is made new project stage, if there is a material project stage, if there is a material change required to that changes the effects of the change required to the document or to the document or to address unforeseen adverse works. address unforeseen adverse effects effects arising from construction and/or unresolved arising from construction and/or Granting approval by doing complaints. unresolved complaints. nothing is not an appropriate The consent holder must submit the updated or way to manage effects. If The consent holder must submit the revised document to the Council for certification at anything requires amendment
917 updated or revised document to the least five working days prior to the new stage of the written approval from the Council for certification at least five project commencing or as soon as practicable Compliance Team Leader will working days prior to the new stage of following identification of the need for a material the project commencing or as soon as need to be obtained before change during construction, (whichever is relevant). If practicable following identification of the management plans are revised. the consent holder has not received a response need for a material change during (short of certification) from the Council within five construction, (whichever is relevant). If working days of submitting the revised information, the consent holder has not received a the consent holder will be deemed to have response (short of certification) from the certification and can commence the works, stage or Council within five working days of activity. submitting the revised information, the consent holder will be deemed to have certification and can commence the works, stage or activity
LUC60328290 Prior to the commencement of the 11. Earthworks – Pre-Construction Meeting The relevant plans are listed for earthworks activity, the consent holder reference. 7. Five working days prior to the commencement of shall hold a pre-start meeting that: bulk earthworks on the site for Stage 1, a • is located on the subject preconstruction site meeting between Council and all site; relevant parties, including the supervising site • is scheduled not less engineer, shall be arranged. than five days before the The following information shall be provided at the pre- anticipated construction meeting: commencement of a) Timeframes for key stages of the works authorised earthworks; under this consent; • includes Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring b) Contact details of the site contractor and NW 1, Auckland Council, supervising site engineer; and representatives; and c) Relevant certified management plans. • includes representation
918 from the contractors who will undertake the works. The meeting shall discuss the erosion and sediment control measures, the earthworks methodology and shall ensure all relevant parties are aware of and familiar with the necessary conditions of this consent.
The following information shall be made available at the pre-start meeting:
• Timeframes for key stages of the works authorised under this consent; • Resource consent conditions; • The finalised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; • The Chemical Treatment Management Plan; and • The Streamworks Management Plan. A pre-start meeting shall be held prior to the commencement of the earthworks activity in each period between October 1 and April 30 that consent LUC60328290 is exercised. 919 12. Earthworks - Completion or Abandonment of Earthworks - Completion or Works Abandonment of Works 8. Upon completion or abandonment of earthworks Upon completion or abandonment of on the subject site all areas of bare earth shall be earthworks on the subject site all areas permanently stabilised against erosion to the of bare earth shall be permanently satisfaction of the Council. stabilised against erosion to the satisfaction of the Team Leader - Compliance Monitoring NW 1, Auckland Council.
Advice Note: Should the earthworks be completed or abandoned, bare areas of earth shall be permanently stabilised against erosion. Measures may include:
• the use of mulching • top-soiling, grassing and mulching of otherwise bare areas of earth • aggregate or vegetative cover that has obtained a density of more than 80% of a normal pasture sward The on-going monitoring of these measures is the responsibility of the consent holder. It is recommended that you discuss any potential measures with the Council’s monitoring officer who will guide you on the most appropriate approach to take. Please contact the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring
920 NW 1, Auckland Council, for more details. Alternatively, please refer to Auckland Council Guide, ‘Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region’, June 2016 Guideline Document 2016/005 (GD05). The Consent Holder shall implement all Construction Not required. This condition is from the Puhoi Works in accordance with the best methods available to Warkworth motorway consent at the time of construction to: and is not relevant to this AT application. In addition, this (a) Minimise the volume and area of the proposed condition refers to an Adaptive earthworks required for the Project through the Monitoring Program which is not design of batter slopes appropriate to expected soil something that has been types and geology; recommended for the AT (b) Maximise the effectiveness of erosion and application within the ESCP and sediment control measures associated with therefore the condition should be earthworks by minimising potential for sediment removed altogether to avoid generation and sediment yield; and confusion. (c) Minimise effects on freshwater and marine water environments within or beyond the Project boundary, with particular regard to reducing the likelihood that the Project will generate sediment at the trigger level specified in Condition RC36(d). Prior to the commencement of 13. Earthworks - Erosion and Sediment Control Plan This is a repeat of the first part of earthworks activity on the subject site, a (ESCP) recommended condition 5 above finalised Erosion and Sediment Control 10. At least 20 working days prior to the Plan (ESCP), shall be prepared in commencement of bulk earthworks for Stage 1, the general accordance with the application consent holder shall submit to the Council for documents referred to under condition 1, 921 certification an ESCP which provides for the and in accordance with Auckland management of all bulk earthworks to minimise any Council’s Guideline Document 2016/005 discharge of debris, soil, sediment or sediment-laden Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for water beyond the site to either land and/ or Land Disturbing Activities in the stormwater drainage systems. Auckland Region (GD05) and shall An ESCP shall include, but is not limited to, the include, but is not limited to: following matters: • specific erosion and sediment control works a) Specific erosion and sediment control works for the earthworks (location, dimensions, capacity supporting (location and calculations and design drawings), which should be in dimensions, capacity) in line with Industry Best Practice that will meet or accordance with GD05; exceed the performance of measures detailed in • supporting calculations Auckland Council’s Erosion and Sediment Control and design drawings as Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland necessary; Region Guideline Document 2016/005 (GD05); • details of construction b) Catchment boundaries; methods; c) The timing and duration of construction and • monitoring and operation of control works (in relation to the staging maintenance and sequencing of earthworks); requirements; catchment boundaries and contour d) Details relating to the management of dust information; generated by earthworks; and • details relating to the e) Details relating to the management of exposed management of dust areas. generated by earthworks; The consent holder shall comply with the ESCP for and, the duration of the earthworks associated with the • details relating to the Project. management of exposed areas (e.g. grassing, mulching). 922 These finalised ESCP shall be submitted to the Team Leader – Compliance NW 1, Auckland Council, on [email protected]. No earthworks activity on the subject site shall commence until written confirmation from the Team Leader is provided that the ESCP is satisfactory.
Advice Note: In the event that minor amendments to the ESCP are required, any such amendments should be limited to the scope of this consent. Any amendments which affect the performance of the ESCP may require an application to be made in accordance with section 127 of the RMA. Any minor amendments should be provided to the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW 1, Auckland Council, prior to implementation to confirm that they are within the scope of this consent. Prior to the commencement of 14. earthworks, a certificate signed by a suitably qualified person shall be submitted to the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW1, to certify that the erosion and sediment controls have been constructed in accordance 923 with the approved ESCP referenced under Condition 13.
Certified controls shall include any 15. Sediment Retention Ponds, Decanting Earth Bunds, Other Impoundment Systems, Silt fences and Super Silt Fences. The certification for these measures shall be supplied immediately upon completion of their construction. Information supplied if applicable, shall include:
• Contributing catchment area; • Size of structure (dimensions, including volume of structure); • Position of inlets/outlets; and • Stabilisation of the structure. Prior to the commencement of 16. Additional condition earthworks at the site, a Chemical Treatment Management Plan shall be submitted for the written approval of the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW 1, Auckland Council. The plan shall
924 include as a minimum: g) Specific design details of the chemical treatment system based on a rainfall activated methodology for the site’s sediment retention ponds, decanting earth bunds, and any other impoundment systems; h) Monitoring, maintenance (including post storm) and contingency programme (including a record sheet); i) Details of optimum dosage (including assumptions); j) Results of initial chemical treatment trial; k) A spill contingency plan; and l) Details of the person or bodies that will hold responsibility for long term operation and maintenance of the chemical treatment system and the organisational structure which will support this system.
The Chemical Treatment 17. Addition condition – chemical
925 Management Plan referred to treatment management plan under condition 16 above, shall be implemented prior to the start of any earthworks at areas of the site where decanting earth bunds or the sediment retention pond are established. Advice Note: The CTMP may be based on existing CTMPs for the remaining Long Bay development with confirmation of treatment design dosage rates. In the event that minor amendments to the CTMP are required, any such amendments should be limited to the scope of this consent. Any amendments which affect the performance of the CTMP may require an application to be made in accordance with section 127 of the RMA. Any minor amendments should be provided to the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW 1, prior to implementation to confirm that they are within the scope of this consent. Earthworks - General Performance Standards
18. 11. The Consent Holder shall ensure that there shall There shall be no deposition of earth, Revised for clarity be no deposition of earth, mud, dirt or other debris on mud, dirt or other debris on any public any public road or footpath resulting from bulk road or footpath resulting from bulk earthworks on the subject site. In the event that such earthworks on the subject site. In the deposition does occur, it shall immediately be event that such deposition does occur, it removed. In no instance, shall roads or footpaths be shall immediately be removed. In no
926 washed down with water without appropriate erosion instance, shall roads or footpaths be and sediment control measures in place to prevent washed down with water without contamination of the stormwater drainage system, appropriate erosion and sediment watercourses or receiving waters. control measures in place to prevent contamination of the stormwater drainage system, watercourses or receiving waters.
19. 12. The operational effectiveness and efficiency of all Accepted erosion and sediment control measures specifically required as a condition of resource consent, including the certified ESCP referred to shall be maintained throughout the duration of earthworks, or until the Project site is permanently stabilised against erosion. Advice Note: In accordance with 20. 13. The site shall be progressively stabilised against Additional advice note added to Condition 20, earthworks shall be erosion at all stages of earthworks activity, and shall this condition be sequenced to minimise the discharge of progressively stabilised against erosion contaminants to groundwater or surface water. during all stages of the earthwork activity. Interim stabilisation measures may include:
• the use of waterproof covers, geotextiles, or mulching • top-soiling and grassing and mulching of otherwise bare areas of earth • aggregate or vegetative cover that has obtained a density of more than 80% of a normal pasture sward
927 It is recommended that you discuss any potential measures with the Council’s monitoring officer who may be able to provide further guidance on the most appropriate approach to take. Please contact the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW 1, Auckland Council, for more details. Alternatively, please refer to Auckland Council Guide, ‘Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region’, June 2016 Guideline Document 2016/005 (GD05).
The sediment and erosion controls 21. 14. The consent holder shall ensure that the erosion This condition combines at the site of the works shall be and sediment control measures are constructed and applicants conditions 14 and 15. maintained in accordance with GD05, except where a constructed and maintained in higher standard is detailed in an ESCP, in which case accordance with Auckland the higher standard shall apply. Council’s Guideline Document 2016/005 Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region (GD05), except where a higher standard is detail in the approved ESCP, in which case this higher standard shall apply. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be inspected on a regular basis and within 24 hours of each 928 rainstorm event that is likely to impair the function or performance of the controls. A record shall be maintained of the date, time and any maintenance undertaken in association with this condition which shall be forwarded to the Council on request. 15. Sediment control measures shall be inspected on Not required Condition combined with the a weekly basis and after a significant storm event to condition above. ensure effective operation.
22. 16. The consent holder shall ensure that all material The consent holder shall ensure that all Can’t impose conditions on a removed from or delivered to the Project site shall be material removed from the Project site third party. There’s also no covered during transportation. shall be covered during transportation. requirement for washed aggregate or similar, to be covered.
Archaeological and Cultural Earthworks Supervision
23. 17. The consent holder shall ensure that the Accepted commencement of earthworks within the riparian margins of Stream F are supervised by the Project Archaeologist.
24. 18. The consent holder shall invite interested iwi to Accepted supervise the commencement of earthworks within the riparian margins of Stream F.
Avifauna Management 929 25. 19. Should vegetation removal within the podocarp No vegetation within protected riparian Could prove to be unworkable if forest be proposed to take place during the native areas shall be removed between 1 the tree with nests in is in the bird nesting period which is between 1 September September and 28 February unless the middle of the new route. and 28 February, a suitably qualified ornithologist matters below have been addressed. Would be more suitable to have shall complete a survey at least one week before any Should vegetation removal within the a condition that states no tree vegetation is to be cleared to ensure that there is no podocarp forest be proposed to take removal during nesting season, active native bird nesting occurring at that time. place during the native bird nesting if habitat removal is necessary a Should any active nesting be found, then a 10m wide period which is between 1 September management plan to be radius of vegetation, or buffer area, shall be retained and 28 February, a suitably qualified submitted for approval. around the nest until such time that all eggs have ornithologist shall complete a survey at Furthermore, the condition is hatched and nestlings have naturally left the natal least one week before any vegetation is only specific to podocarp forest, nesting tree/trees. to be cleared to ensure that there is no and birds may be within active native bird nesting occurring at wetlands and riparian areas, and that time. is specific to ‘protected’ birds. Should vegetation removal be required within the podocarp forest, and wetland / riparian areas, during bird nesting season (1 September and 28 February), a suitably qualified ornithologist shall complete a survey at least one week before any vegetation is to be cleared to ensure that there is no active native bird nesting occurring at that time. Should any active nesting be found, the ornithologist shall prepare a management plan to avoid any disturbance to protected avifauna until
930 such time that all eggs have hatched, and nestlings have naturally left the natal nesting tree/trees.
Bat Management Prior to undertaking vegetation removal Survey is required, as monitoring 26. 20. Prior to undertaking vegetation removal within the within the podocarp forest, a suitability may be misleading to the reader, podocarp forest, a suitability qualified ecologist shall qualified ecologist shall undertake and an appropriate buffer be undertake monitoring in accordance with the Wildlife appropriate survey and/or monitoring in defined around the tree(s) to Act to confirm that no roosting bats are present in the accordance with the Wildlife Act to safeguard the animals. works area. Should any bats be discovered, the confirm that no roosting bats are present
affected tree(s) shall be retained until the bats have in the works area. Should any bats be left it for a new roosting location. discovered, the affected tree(s), and an appropriate buffer, shall be retained until the bats have left it for a new roosting location.
Native Lizard Management Plan The condition should be specific 27. 21. Prior to the commencement of any vegetation Prior to the commencement of any all areas where lizards may be. clearance or earthworks within the podocarp forest or vegetation clearance or earthworks the riparian margins of Stream E and F, a Native within lizard habitat the podocarp forest Relocation sites should be Lizard Management Plan (NLMP) shall be submitted or the riparian margins of Stream E and suitable and certified as optimal to and certified by the Council. The NLMP shall F, a Native Lizard Management Plan release areas. include a capture-and-relocation operation for native (NLMP) shall be submitted to and skinks and geckos and release of rescued individuals certified by the Council. The NLMP shall to suitable protected sites in the surrounding area. If include a capture-and-relocation necessary, the sites are to have wood debris or other operation for native skinks and geckos natural refuges provided. and release of rescued individuals to suitable protected sites in the 931 The NLMP shall include at least the following: surrounding area, capable of sustaining relocated animals. If necessary, the sites a) Recommendations for salvage techniques and are to have wood debris or other natural actions suitable for different lizard species. refuges provided. b) Prior to the commencement of vegetation The NLMP shall include at least the clearance within the podocarp forest of the riparian following: margins of Stream E and F, details of an intensive a) Recommendations for salvage search and trapping programme of at least four techniques and actions suitable for weeks in total, to be undertaken only in favourable different lizard species. seasonal and weather conditions by an experienced and Department of Conservation permitted b) Prior to the commencement of herpetologist, together with the presence of the same vegetation clearance within the during actual vegetation clearance. podocarp forest of the riparian margins of Stream E and F, details of an c) Identified release sites and any associated habitat intensive search and trapping restoration to sustain numbers and recruitment of programme of at least four weeks in both resident and rescued animals if required. total, to be undertaken only in favorable d) Details of any rodent control (pre and post release) seasonal and weather conditions by an to sustain lizard numbers of both resident and experienced and Department of rescued animals together with details of monitoring Conservation permitted herpetologist; the effectiveness of rodent control. together with the presence of the same ecologists during actual vegetation The NLMP shall be implemented as certified, unless clearance. otherwise agreed to by Council. c) Identified release sites and any associated habitat restoration to sustain numbers and recruitment of both resident and rescued animals if required. Surveys shall be undertaken, and presented to Council, of the release sites to provide surety of their suitability
932 d) Details of any rodent control (pre and post release) to sustain lizard numbers of both resident and rescued animals together with details of monitoring the effectiveness of rodent control. The NLMP shall be implemented as certified, unless otherwise agreed to by Council.
Restoration Planting Plan
28. 22. Prior to the opening of Stage 1 of the Project to Prior to the opening construction of Revised timing to provide general traffic, the consent holder shall provide to Stage 1 of the Project to general traffic, restoration planting plan prior to Council for certification, a Restoration Planting Plan the consent holder shall provide to construction. The applicant will (RPP) for the removal of vegetation within the riparian Council for certification, a Restoration know at detailed design stage of margins of Streams E and F. The RPP shall outline Planting Plan (RPP) for the removal of the extent of vegetation the location of intended planting, intended species, vegetation within the riparian margins of alteration and should provide a density of planting, the methods, implementation and Streams E and F. The area of habitat plan at this time. monitoring processes for the restorative planting of loss will be appropriately surveyed to The applicant should be assured indigenous vegetation that is damaged or destroyed ascertain the fullest extent of loss. at detailed design stage of the by construction works. The RPP shall outline the location of extent of vegetation alteration. The restoration plan shall detail any necessary intended planting/ enhancement And this will include the area as surveyed; this will identify a full management of the planting, including weed and (including protection of gully / mature extent of habitat removal animal pest control and replacement of plants, on an trees where applicable), intended ongoing basis. All plants used within the restoration species, density of planting, the Time frame of 3 years added to process shall be eco-sourced from the local area. methods, implementation timing (within 3 set a limit on when mitigation The mitigation proposed shall be calculated using years of construction), legal protection, would be implemented. More current best ecological practices. and monitoring processes for the effective monitoring and allows restorative planting of indigenous off-set outcomes to be more vegetation that is damaged or destroyed consistently assessed.
933 by construction works. Whilst there may be some constraints on timing due to eco- The restoration plan shall detail any sourcing, this can be agreed necessary management of the planting, during the RPP consultation including weed and animal pest control process and be sourced during and replacement of plants, on an the construction phase; all plant ongoing basis. All plants used within the stock should be sourced from an restoration process shall be eco-sourced approved NZPPI supplier; a from the local area and sourced from a nursery which will have excellent nursery that is New Zealand Plant biosecurity procedures and Producers Incorporated (NZPPI) protocols. accredited. Relying on “current best The mitigation proposed shall be ecological practice” for calculated using current best ecological accountancy on offsetting is too practices accounting models e.g. DoC open to interpretation. There are Guidance on Good Practice Offsetting in national guidance models and New Zealand. documents, and Mr Statham has recommended the DoC model.
29. 23. A monitoring and maintenance period for all A monitoring and maintenance period for The AUP guidelines and mitigation planting shall be no less than 3 years or all mitigation planting shall be no less ecological best practice defines unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Council. An than 3 5 years or unless otherwise 5 years as the minimum time audit of tree/plant condition shall be sent to the agreed in writing by the Council. An required to implement and Consent Authority every six months during the audit of tree/plant condition shall be sent achieve canopy closure; maintenance period. During the maintenance period, to the Consent Authority every six furthermore, standard restoration trees/plants that die or fail to perform to the months during the maintenance period. practices would require satisfaction of the Council shall be replaced as/if During the maintenance period, supplemental enrichment necessary, to achieve a 90% performance standard. trees/plants that die or fail to perform to species to be added at year 3. the satisfaction of the Council shall be The Auckland Code of Practice replaced as/if necessary, to achieve a for Land Development and 90% performance standard and/or 85%
934 Subdivision Chapter 7: Green canopy closure. Assets and Landscaping (draft), states for re-vegetation, riparian planting and stormwater devices five years is the minimum maintenance period. This proposed condition of consent is a divergence from Auckland Council’s code of practice. I also suggest that 90% performance standard is edited to consider canopy closure of planting, as this is a standard metric for success.
Kauri Dieback Management
30. 24. The consent holder shall employ the Kauri Accepted Dieback Management Plan (KDMP) for the duration of construction works. The purpose of the KDMP is to prevent the transmission of Phytophthora agathidicida. The KDMP has be prepared in accordance with Auckland Council’s Kauri Dieback Operating Procedures and must be complied with until the completion of construction.
Streamworks Permit – LUS60328462 and WAT60328292
31. Streamworks Management Plan Streamworks Management Plan Revised 25. Prior to the commencement of bulk earthworks, Prior to the commencement of any
935 the consent holder shall submit to Council for streamworks activities on the certification a Streamworks Management Plan (SMP). subject site, a Streamworks The purpose of the SMP is minimise the effects of Management plan (SMP) shall be construction, including the installation of culverts, on prepared in general accordance the Project corridor’s streams. with the application document The SMP shall include the following: referenced under condition 1 above, the guidance outlined in a) Proposed timing of the works and any diversions; Auckland Council Guidance b) What machinery is proposed and how the Document 005, Erosion and machinery is to be managed and checked to avoid Sediment Control Guide for Land contamination of water with fluids and fuel Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region, June 2016 c) How sediment controls will be installed and (GD05) and shall include, but is removed; not limited to: d) Any stockpiling locations; • specific erosion and e) Methods for de-fishing; sediment control works for the streamworks f) Relocation Plan for fish indigenous species; and (location and g) Methods for protection of streams outside of the dimensions, capacity of extent of streamworks. any diversions / settlement tanks), pumping and de-watering arrangements for any diversions / de-watering and details to confirm a suitable water quality prior to discharge of treated runoff, in general accordance with GD05; • supporting calculations and design drawings as
936 necessary; • monitoring and maintenance requirements; • how controls will avoid any discharge of contaminants to water (e.g. hydrocarbons, construction materials); and • details relating to the management of exposed areas (e.g. final stabilisation measures of exposed surfaces).
The SMP shall be submitted to the Team Leader - Compliance Monitoring NW1, on [email protected].
No streamworks activities on the subject site shall commence until written confirmation from the Team Leader is provided that the SMP and streamworks methodology is satisfactory.
Advice Note: In the event that minor amendments to the ESCP or streamworks methodology are required, any such amendments should be limited
937 to the scope of this consent. Any amendments which affect the performance of the ESCP may require an application to be made in accordance with section 127 of the RMA. Any minor amendments should be provided to the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW1, prior to implementation to confirm that they are within the scope of this consent.
Prior to the commencement of any 32. Additional condition streamworks activities authorised by the granting of this consent, a Fish Relocation Plan (FRP) shall be prepared by a suitably qualified freshwater ecologist for written approval by the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW1. The FRP shall include details of how any native fish, including any native koura, will be captured and relocated ahead of any physical streamworks commencing on stream E, as referenced in the documents contained in condition 1 above. Streamworks shall not commence until written comment from the Team Leader is provided confirming its suitability. The culvert on Watercourses E as 938 33. Additional condition referenced in the documents referred to under condition 1 above, shall be set a minimum 15% below the natural invert level of the stream and shall include appropriately installed fish baffles to allow for upstream fish passage in accordance with the NIWA New Zealand Fish Passage Guidelines, 2018. Streamworks Restrictions No machinery shall enter the 34. 26. All machinery shall be operated in a way, which Revised to be clear about how wetted portion of any stream at ensures that spillages of fuel, oil and similar machinery shall be operated on contaminants are prevented, particularly during any time. All machinery associated site. stabilisation and machinery servicing and with the earthworks and / or maintenance. Refuelling and lubrication activities streamworks activities shall be shall be carried out away from any water body such operated (including maintenance, that any spillage can be contained so it does not lubrication and refuelling) in a way, enter the watercourses associated with this consent. which ensures no hazardous The use of grouts and concrete products shall also be substances such as fuel, oil or limited adjacent to the watercourses with all mixing of similar contaminants are products carried out outside the 100-year floodplain discharged. In the event that any area such that any spillage can be contained so it discharge occurs, works shall does not enter watercourses A to F associated with cease immediately, and the this consent. discharge shall be mitigated and/or rectified to the satisfaction of the Team Leader - Compliance Monitoring NW1.
939 Advice Note: Refuelling, lubrication and maintenance activities associated with any machinery should be carried out away from any water body with appropriate methods in place so if any spillage does occur that it will be contained and does not enter the water body.
35. 27. When dewatering the area of works, no sediment When dewatering any area where Revised laden water shall be discharged directly into a streamworks is to occur, all water must watercourse. Any sediment laden discharge pumped be disposed of via suitable sediment or otherwise removed from the works area must be treatment system. disposed of via suitable sediment treatment system. Streamworks shall only be carried 36. 28. All exposed areas, including the bed of the Additional condition out during periods when all flows, streams and the areas within the 1% AEP floodplain, are to be stabilised at the end of each construction normal for the time of year the day. works are undertaken can be diverted around the area of works, throughout the duration of works in the area where streamworks are being undertaken. During periods of flow greater than the capacity of the diversion, up to the 100 year flood event, a stabilised flow path shall be provided to ensure no scour or erosion occurs and so that flows can pass safely around or through the area of works with minimum nuisance and damage and with no sediment generation 940 or discharge. The areas where streamworks are 37. Additional condition to occur shall be progressively stabilised against erosion at all stages of the works activity and shall be sequenced to minimise the discharge of sediment to surface water. That within 90 days of practical 38. Additional condition completion of streamworks at the site, As-Built Certification and Plans of the new in-stream structures, prepared and signed by a suitably qualified person, shall be provided for the written approval of the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring NW1. No land disturbing activities, earthworks 39. Additional condition or streamworks, on the site shall be undertaken between 30 April and 1 October in any year, without the prior written approval of the Team Leader - Compliance Monitoring NW 1, Auckland Council, at least two weeks prior to 30 April of any year. Revegetation/stabilisation is to be completed by 30 April in accordance with measures detailed in GD05 and any amendments to this document.
941 40. Streamworks Offset Plan (SOP) Streamworks Offset Plan (SOP) It has already been determined that offsetting is required for 29. At least 20 days prior to undertaking the At least 20 days prior to undertaking the Stream E. The purpose of this permanent culverting of Stream E, the consent holder permanent culverting of Stream E, the plan is confirm the quantum of shall provide to Council for certification, a consent holder shall provide to Council offset required following Streamworks Offset Plan (SOP). The purpose the for certification, a Streamworks Offset concept/detailed design. SOP is to determine the offsetting required under Plan (SOP). Condition revised to reflect this. Policy E3.4(4) of the Auckland Unitary Plan A Streamworks Offset Plan (SOP) shall The proposed condition is not (Operative in Part) for the culverting Stream E. The be submitted to the Team seeking any information SOP shall provide the following information: Leader/Compliance Monitoring NW1 for additional to what has already a) Location details of the compensation site(s); certification prior to the pre-start meeting been provided which is currently referred to in condition 11 above. The brief and conceptual. b) Full calculations, in accordance with TR2011/009 purpose the SOP is to determine the and/or TR2016/023, to determine the required Ms Ingley considers that offsetting required under Policy E3.4(4) amount of offsetting; and enhancement actions being of the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative confirmed before streamworks c) A description of the offset compensation activities. in Part) for the culverting Stream E. The impacts occur. SOP shall provide the following information: It is not considered appropriate for the location of the offset site a) Location details of the offset site(s); to be open due to uncertainty b) Proposed timing of the works regarding whether an alternative site would provide a good c) Full calculations, in accordance with biodiversity outcome under TR2011/009 and/or TR2016/023, to Policy E3.3(4). An additional determine the required amount of condition is proposed below offsetting including: requiring the offset to be located • Details of how the offset works within Millhouse Reserve. will achieve, (or exceed) the Auckland Council can only ‘potential’ stream ecological certify (and not approve) plans valuation (SEV) value in the as part of a condition of consent. application report and SEV
942 Conditions that require calculator submitted with the management plans must provide application and s92 response (m- clear performance or P = 0.44). environmental standards to be certified against. The amended • Details of the additional quantum condition aims to provide of offset required to address the standards for Council to certify time lag between impact and against. offset (if this is to exceed one The longer the period between year). A minimum multiplier of 2X impact and offset, the greater is to be applied to the standard the effect and larger the ECR calculations. quantum of offset required. The ; and time frame proposed of 5 years is not ideal and any additional d) A description of the offset deferral is not considered to be compensation activities. appropriate. Details of the enhanced stream channel, including but not limited to: 2X multiplier offered by applicant • Consent requirements for the offset site (if any) • Long and cross sections detailed design • Erosion and scour controls • Stream sinuosity and meander frequency • Provision of instream habitat diversity and low flow channels • Provision of a vegetated near flat floodplain • Plans identifying riparian and
943 floodplain planting zones. All measurements must be clearly depicted on the plans.
• Appropriate species list including planting densities to be applied. • A pest plant and animal monitoring and maintenance plan for a period of five years to ensure that a 90% survival rate and canopy closure is achieved.
Advice Note: All riparian planting shall be in accordance with the Auckland Regional Council Riparian Zone Management Strategy for the Auckland Region, Technical Publication 148, June 2001 (TP148)
The maintenance period shall commence once all the offset works required have been completed 41. The Streamworks offset site required by Additional condition condition 40 is to be located at Millhouse Park within the area identified within the Bioresearches s92 Ecology Response Figure 4. The stream offset works detailed under 42. Additional condition to put a
944 condition 40 above, shall be completed timeframe on the off-set works to within five years after the ensure mitigated proposed commencement of the streamworks associated with Watercourse E and meets outcomes proposed. This authorised by this consent. All planting is linked to time lag between shall be carried out within the planting impact and off-set. season 20th May till the 31st of August. Written confirmation shall be provided to the Team Leader, NW1, within 30 days of the stream offset works being completed confirming that all stream offset works have been completed.
Advice Note:
This condition does not approve works outside the appropriate permitted activity standards. Depending on the Streamworks Offset Plan additional reasons for consent may be triggered. Prior to the completion of any 43. Additional condition to monitor maintenance period for the stream off- effectiveness of off-set site set works completed under condition 40 above, a practical completion certificate (or similar) must be obtained from the Team Leader – Compliance Monitoring North. The practical completion certificate must ensure that: a. No more than 10% loss in plant numbers has occurred without replacement. 945 b. Weed control has been carried out to a level where no mature fruiting or flowering weed species are present within the planting areas and no weed species that will impact on the growth rates of the planted trees and/or the potential for native regeneration are to be present within the planting area. The conditions of consent 44. LUS60328463 may be reviewed by the Auckland Council in accordance with Section 128 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (with the costs of the review process being borne by the Consent Holder), by giving notice in accordance with Section 129 of the Act, in one or more of the following times:
• Within five years of initiation of the streamworks; and/or • And/or at two yearly intervals after that time. The purpose of the review may be for any of the following purposes, namely:
i) To ensure the streamworks offset required under condition 40 achieves the intended effects, specifically that the potential 946 ecological value of the offset site is achieved.
ii) Insert conditions, or modify existing conditions, requiring the consent holder to adopt the Best Practicable Option to remedy, mitigate, minimise, any adverse effects on the environment resulting from the streamworks activities authorised by these consents, including remedying or mitigating any adverse effect on the environment which may arise from the exercise of these consents and which it is appropriate to deal with at a later stage. WAT60328292 - Groundwater Diversion
45. 30. The Council is to be advised in writing at least 10 The Council is to be advised in writing at Additional changes to address working days prior to the date of the Commencement least 10 working days prior to the date of changes to the of Dewatering. the Commencement of Dewatering. In groundwater/stabilisation that addition to notification of works, if any may occur through any changes changes are proposed to the design, an to design. updated design report must be submitted to council to confirm that the effects on groundwater remain within the envelope of effects proposed in the application. 947 46. Under section 128 of the RMA the Additional conditions to ensure conditions of this consent may be works meet standards for the RD reviewed by the Manager Resource activity. Consents at the consent holder’s cost: At intervals of not less than one year following Commencement of Dewatering to vary the monitoring and reporting requirements, and performance standards, in order to take account of information, including the results of previous monitoring and changed environmental knowledge on: 1) ground conditions 2) aquifer parameters 3) groundwater levels; and 4) ground surface movement 47. Notice of Commencement of Dewatering The Team Leader Compliance Monitoring North West shall be advised in writing at least 10 working days prior to the date of the Commencement of Dewatering.
48. Design of Basement walls and Retaining The design and construction of
948 excavations associated with the Matakana Link Road shall be undertaken in accordance with the specifications contained in the report titled “Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Assessment of Effects” prepared by Jacobs NZ Ltd, dated 8 October 2018.
49. Excavation Limit The Bulk Excavation shall not extend below the levels shown on drawings numbered IZ080100-1-DBC-CD-DRG- 0001 to IZ080100-1-DBC-CD-DRG-2003 (and appended to the report entitled “Matakana Link Road – Tūhonohono ki Tai: Notice or Requirement, Resource Consent Application & Assessment of Environmental Effects” prepared by Jacobs NZ Ltd, dated October 2018.
50. Performance Standards Damage Avoidance All excavation, dewatering systems, retaining structures, basements, stabilisation and works associated with the diversion or taking of groundwater, shall be designed, constructed and maintained so as to avoid Damage to buildings, structures and Services on the site or adjacent properties, outside that
949 considered as part of the application process unless otherwise agreed in writing with the asset owner.
51. Contingency Actions If the consent holder becomes aware of any Damage to buildings, structures or Services potentially caused wholly, or in part, by the exercise of this consent, the Consent Holder shall: Notify the Team Leader Compliance Monitoring North West and the asset owner within two working days of the consent holder becoming aware of the Damage. Provide a report prepared by a SQEP (engaged by the Consent Holder at their cost) that describes the Damage; identifies the cause of the Damage; identifies methods to remedy and/or mitigate the Damage that has been caused; identifies the potential for further Damage to occur, and describes actions that will be taken to avoid further Damage. Provide a copy of the report prepared under (b) above, to the Team Leader Compliance Monitoring North West and
950 the asset owner within 10 working days of notification under (a) above. Advice Note: It is anticipated the Consent Holder will seek the permission of the damaged asset to access the property and asset to enable the inspection/investigation. It is understood that if access is denied the report will be of limited extent.
52. Notice of Completion The Team Leader Compliance Monitoring North West shall be advised in writing within 10 working days of when excavation and dewatering (for construction purposes) has been completed.
53. Permanent Drainage After Completion of Construction, any permanent backfill or drainage systems installed for cut slopes or behind retaining walls shall not cause groundwater levels adjacent to the site to be reduced below the calculated design levels (as defined by the report entitled “Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Assessment of Effects” prepared by Jacobs NZ Ltd, dated 8 October 2018). 951 54. Groundwater Maintenance Program At the Completion of Dewatering, the Team Leader Compliance Monitoring North West shall be provided with a maintenance program for any permanent groundwater drainage system used to manage groundwater levels. Advice Note: The Consent Holder is advised that the discharge of pumped groundwater to a stormwater system or waterbody will need to comply with any other regulations, bylaws or discharge rules that may apply.
DIS60328291 – Stormwater Discharge Permit DIS60328291 – Stormwater Diversion and Discharge Permit, and LUC60328290 – Regional Land Use Consent for a High Use Road
55. Detailed Design Guidelines Accepted Recommend also outlining the specific ‘outcomes’ required for 31. The consent holder shall ensure that all the different devices for clarity. stormwater management devices are designed in Detail provided in amendments accordance with Auckland Council Guidance to condition 56 below. Document “Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region” (GD01).
56. 32. The consent holder shall ensure that the detailed A Stormwater Management Plan Condition revised to include designs, including drawings, plans and calculations (SWMP) shall be submitted to the detail on the matters and content for the stormwater management devices required by Council for certification at the time of for the stormwater management
952 the Project are submitted to Council for certification at application for Engineering Plan plan which includes the revision the time of application for Engineering Plan Approval Approval and in any event, at least 30 of wetland 3 if required. and in any event, at least 30 days prior to days prior to construction of the construction of the proposed stormwater works. proposed stormwater works. The SWMP shall outline the detailed design of the stormwater management systems to demonstrate compliance with the required stormwater management objectives, and shall include: • Detailed design drawings and plans; • Supporting calculations and modelling results; • Summary report. Required stormwater objectives for the project are outlined in the Stormwater Management Report for Matakana Link Road, prepared by Aecom and dated 05 October 2018. Modifications to these objectives may be considered through the SWMP certification process in the event of changes to the hydrological and/or hydraulic conditions for the project and surrounding surface water catchments, including in respect of the western project extents and interactions with State Highway 1.
Modifications Approval 953 57. 33. In the event that any modifications to the A revised SWMP shall be submitted to, Replace this condition with a stormwater management system design implemented and certified by the Council, prior to more general condition as under this consent are required, the following implementation modifications can be information shall be provided: incorporated into the stormwater management plan which sets a) Plans and drawings outlining the details of the clear outcomes. modifications; and b) Supporting information that confirms compliance with GD01. All information shall be submitted to, and certified by the Council, prior to implementation.
Pre-construction Meeting
58. 34. A pre-construction meeting shall be held by the Accepted consent holder prior to commencement of the construction of any stormwater devices onsite, and must: a) Be arranged five working days prior to initiation of the construction of any stormwater devices on the site; b) Be located on the subject area; c) Include representation from the Council; and d) Include representation from the site stormwater engineer [or] contractors who will undertake the works and any other relevant parties.
954 59. Information Required for Pre-Construction Accepted Meeting 35. The following information shall be made available prior to, or at the pre-construction meeting: a) Timeframes for key stages of the works authorised under this consent; b) Erosion and sediment control measures during construction activities; c) Contact details of the site contractor and site stormwater engineer; and d) Construction plans approved signed or stamped by an Auckland Council Development Engineer
60. Post-Construction Meeting Accepted 36. A post-construction meeting shall be held by the Consent Holder, within 20 working days of completion of the stormwater management works, that: a) Is located on the subject area; b) Includes representation from the Council; and c) Includes representation from the site stormwater engineer or contractors who have undertaken the works.
Certification of stormwater management works (As-Built Plans)
61. 37. As-Built certification and plans of the stormwater Accepted management works, which are certified (signed) by a
955 Chartered Professional Engineer as a true record of the stormwater management system, shall be provided to the Council for approval, 5 days prior to the post-construction meeting required by this consent.
62. 38. The As-Built plans shall display the entirety of the Accepted stormwater management system, and shall include: a) The surveyed location (to the nearest 0.1m) and level (to the nearest 0.01m) of the discharge structure, with co-ordinates expressed in terms of NZTM and LINZ datum; b) Location, dimensions and levels of any overland flow paths including cross sections and long sections; c) Plans and cross sections of all stormwater management devices, including confirmation of the water quality volume, storage volumes and levels of any outflow control structure; and d) Documentation of any discrepancies between the design plans and the As-Built plans approved by the modifications approval process.
Operation and Maintenance Plan
63. 39. An Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be An Operation and Maintenance Plan It is suggested that the operation provided to the Council for certification 5 days prior to shall be provided to the Council for and maintenance plan could the post-construction meeting required by this certification 5 days prior to the post- form part of the SWMP rather consent and shall set out how the stormwater construction meeting required by this than a separate document, as management system is to be operated and consent and shall set out how the the operation and maintenance maintained to ensure that adverse environmental stormwater management system is to be is linked to the types of devices 956 effects are minimised. The plan shall include: operated and maintained to ensure that proposed and is relied on to ensure their effectiveness. a) Details of who will hold responsibility for long-term adverse environmental effects are maintenance of the stormwater minimised. The plan shall include: management system and the organisational structure a) Details of who will hold responsibility which will support this process; for long-term maintenance of the stormwater b) A programme for regular maintenance and inspection of the stormwater management system; management system and the organisational structure which will c) A programme for the collection and disposal of support this process; debris and sediment collected by the stormwater management devices or practices; b) A programme for regular maintenance and inspection of the stormwater d) A programme for post storm inspection and management system; maintenance; c) A programme for the collection and e) General inspection checklists for all aspects of the disposal of debris and sediment stormwater management system, including visual collected by the stormwater checks; and management devices or practices; f) A programme for inspection and maintenance of d) A programme for post storm any vegetation associated with the stormwater inspection and maintenance; management devices. e) General inspection checklists for all aspects of the stormwater management system, including visual checks; and f) A programme for inspection and maintenance of any vegetation associated with the stormwater management devices. The Operation and Maintenance Plan can form part of the Stormwater 957 Management Plan (SWMP) required by conditions of this consent.
64. 40. The stormwater management system shall be Monitoring/Maintenance Report Recommended that this managed in accordance with the approved Operation condition is replaced with a Details of all inspections and and Maintenance Plan. requirement to monitor and maintenance for the stormwater report on monitoring results. This management system, for the will provide a feedback loop to preceding three years, shall be Council for ongoing operation retained. and maintenance works.
65. 41. The Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be A maintenance report shall be provided Replace updated and submitted to the Council upon request. to the Council on request.
66. The maintenance report shall include the Additional condition following information: details of who is responsible for maintenance of the stormwater management system and the organisational structure supporting this process; details of any maintenance undertaken; and details of any inspections completed.
Advice Notes
1. The Requiring Authority is advised that archaeological provisions of the Heritage New 958 Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 apply to archaeological sites whether previously recorded or discovered during works.
2. The Requiring Authority is advised of the requirements of Rule E11.6.1 of the Auckland Unitary Plan for “Accidental Discovery” as they relate to both contaminated soils and heritage items.
959 960 ATTACHMENT 22
PERMITTED ACTIVITY REVIEW – AIR QUALITY AND CONTAMINATED LAND
961
962
Memo 14 January 2019 To: Gemma Hayes, Senior Planner – North/West Consenting From: Paul Crimmins, Senior Specialist – Contamination, Air & Noise
Subject: BUN60328269: Auckland Transport Matakana Link Road – Air Quality Review
I have reviewed the application to construct and operate a new link road between Matakana Road and State Highway 1, north of Warkworth, with respect to actual and potential air quality effects. I have reviewed the following documents:
- Notice of requirement, resource consent application & assessment of environmental effects, October 2018, Jacobs (‘the AEE’); - Matakana Link Road: Plans, 2 October 2018, Jacobs; - Matakana Link Road (Tūhonohono ki Tai): Assessment of air quality effects, 8 October 2018, Jacobs (‘the AQ Report’); - Matakana Link Road (Tūhonohono ki Tai): Proposed conditions, 8 October 2018, Jacobs.
AUP(OP) Air Quality Provisions
Air discharges are controlled by Chapter E14 of the AUP(OP). Discharges of dust from earthworks and the construction of roads are either a Permitted Activity under Rule 14.4.1(A1) in accordance with the ‘General Permitted Activity Standards’ (provided in E14.6.1.1) or, if the scale or nature of these works risks non-compliance with these standards, a Restricted Discretionary Activity under Rule E14.4.1(A83). The most-relevant General Permitted Activity Standard that the works must meet to avoid necessitating an air discharge consent for construction dust discharges is E14.6.1.1(2):
The discharge must not cause noxious, dangerous, offensive or objectionable odour, dust, particulate, smoke or ash beyond the boundary of the premises where the activity takes place.
Operational air discharges (from vehicles using the future road) are a Permitted Activity without standards under Rule E14.4.1(A114):
Discharges to air from the engines of motor vehicles, aircraft, trains, vessels (including boats) and mobile sources not otherwise specified (such as lawnmowers), including those on industrial or trade premises (excluding tunnels) (permitted standards do not apply) [Permitted in all zones].
Proposed Plan Change 14 has amended the wording of Rule E14.4.1(A114) as above (proposed addition underlined) to specify that the permitted discharges are those that arise from the engines of vehicles only. This is intended to exclude instances such as smoke from burn-out events from being included in the permitted activity rule without standards applying. Engine exhaust emissions are controlled by other regulations at a Central Government level.
While the emissions from vehicles using the new road are permitted, they must not, in themselves or cumulatively with discharges from other sources, cause an exceedance of the Ambient Air Quality Standards within the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Air Quality) Regulations 2004 (NES:AQ). Further, the objectives and policies of the AUP(OP) require air quality to be managed with regard to the Auckland Ambient Air Quality Targets contained in Table E14.3.1 of the AUP(OP).
963 Review of AQ Report
The AQ Report assesses the risk of dust discharges from construction of the Matakana Link Road with respect to the above General Permitted Activity Standard and assesses the likely compliance with ambient air quality criteria from vehicle emissions using the operational road.
Construction air quality effects
The AQ Report concludes that the scale of the road construction activity (including bulk earthworks) and nature of the receiving environment mean that typical dust management techniques shall sufficiently minimise the risk of dust discharges so that compliance with the General Permitted Activity Standard shall be achieved. The assessment of dust effects and recommended mitigation measures are in accordance with the Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing Dust (Ministry for the Environment, 2016) and the Guide to Assessing Air Quality Impacts from Stage Highway Projects (NZTA, 2018).
I consider that the assessment sufficiently demonstrates that compliance with permitted activity standard E14.6.1.1(2) can be met throughout the works at all locations outside of the works area. Therefore, I consider that minor discharges of dust and other air pollutants from the road construction activity are a Permitted Activity under Rule E14.4.1(A1) of the AUP(OP).
The proposed conditions include a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) that shall detail methods for minimising and monitoring dust. I consider this is appropriate and recommend that the CEMP includes the air quality management and visual monitoring measures detailed in section 6 of the AQ Report.
Operational air quality effects
The AQ Report undertakes a conservative screening assessment of the potential air quality effects arising from vehicles using the future four-lane road (18,170 vehicles per day) in accordance with the Guide to Assessing Air Quality Impacts from Stage Highway Projects (NZTA, 2018). This assessment concludes that the project is likely to have an overall positive impact on air quality in the Warkworth area, given the predicted reduction of traffic on existing roads. Negligible increases of air pollutants are predicted to arise in the immediate vicinity of the new road given the predicted traffic volumes. No exceedances of relevant ambient air quality criteria are predicted to arise as a cumulative result of emissions from the new road and existing ambient air quality levels.
I consider that the AQ Report’s assessment of operational air quality effects is appropriate and I agree that significant air quality effects are not likely to occur at any location as a result of the proposal.
Conclusion
I consider that air discharges from the construction and operation of the Matakana Link Road are a Permitted Activity under the AUP(OP) and an air discharge consent is not required for the project at this stage. I consider that the AQ Report’s assessment of air quality effects adequately demonstrates that there is a low risk of ‘offensive or objectionable’ dust effects or exceedances of relevant ambient air quality criteria.
I recommend that the CEMP includes dust mitigation measures and requirements for visual monitoring in accordance with the recommendations of the AQ Report to minimise dust discharges as far as practicable and maintain compliance with General Permitted Activity Standard E14.6.1.1(2) throughout the construction works.
Matakana Link Road: Air Quality Review Page 2 964 Gemma Hayes
From: Andrew Kalbarczyk Sent: Friday, 12 October 2018 6:08 PM To: Gemma Hayes Cc: Jared Osman Subject: Matakana Link Road Lodged Documents: LUC60316281 (Earthworks) Attachments: BUN - Matakana Link Road - Contamination-NES Brief.docx
Hi Gemma Following your request, forwarded to me by Jared, I have now checked the application to determine whether our Contaminant Discharge Consent or a NES: CS Consent might be needed.
Based on the Preliminary Site Assessment – Contaminated Land, dated 8 October 2018, prepared by Jacobs New Zealand Ltd the proposed project area has not been affected by any HAIL activities. Therefore, it is unlikely to be contaminated in exceedance of the Permitted Activity soil acceptance criteria set out in Standard E30.6.1.41 of the AUP (OP), and so that NO Contaminant Discharge Consent is considered to be required for the proposed works. Also, with NO part of the proposed project area being affected by HAIL, the NES:CS does NOT apply in this case, and NO Consent under the NES:CS is deemed to be required at this stage.
This is in line with my earlier assessment, undertaken based on a former version of the Preliminary Site Assessment, back in March 2018, please refer to my email below.
Kind regards Andrew
Andrew Kalbarczyk | Senior Specialist – Contaminated Land Contamination, Air & Noise | Specialist Input | Resource Consents Ph 09 301 0101 | DDI 352 2681 | Mobile 021 518 417 Auckland Council, Private Bag 92300, Auckland 1142 Visit our website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz ______From: Andrew Kalbarczyk Sent: Thursday, 15 March 2018 12:54 p.m. To: Simon Titter Cc: Alison Pye; Ruben Naidoo Subject: Matakana Link Road Consent/NoR - BUN60316249 and SH1 Widening Project: Warkworth - PRR00027134
Hi Simon [[…]]
So here are my revised comments, as follows:
Re: Matakana Link Road Consent - BUN60316249: Based on the information provided in the PSI, titled Preliminary Site Assessment (Contamination) Report (Revision 2 – Final), dated 26 February 2018, and prepared by Jacobs New Zealand Ltd, the are no HAIL (Hazardous Activities and Industries List, Ministry for the Environment) activities identified within the proposed project area. Therefore, the risk of contamination exceeding the Permitted Activity soil acceptance criteria set out in Rule E30.6.1.4 of the AUP (OP) is low and NO Contaminant Discharge Consent is deemed to be required for the land-disturbance works associated with the proposed project..
[[…]]
Kind regards Andrew
1 965
Andrew Kalbarczyk | Senior Specialist – Contaminated Land Contamination, Air and Noise | Specialist Unit | Resource Consents Ph 09 301 0101 | DDI 352 2681 | Mobile 021 518 417 Auckland Council, Private Bag 92 300, Auckland 1142 Visit our website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
From: CANconsents Sent: Friday, 12 October 2018 3:26 p.m. To: Andrew Kalbarczyk Subject: FW: Matakana Link Road Lodged Documents
Jared Osman | Team Leader – Contamination, Air & Noise Specialist Unit | Resource Consents Department Mob (027) 267 8412 | Email: [email protected] Auckland Council, Level 2 (East), 35 Graham Street, Private Bag 92 300, Auckland 1142 Visit our website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
From: Gemma Hayes Sent: Friday, 12 October 2018 12:14 PM To: Samuel Holmes
Hi All,
Auckland Transport have re-lodged the application for MLR NOR and regional consents.
They have requested public notification so we will be working on that next week and hopefully have it notified ASAP. In the meantime please review the application and prepare any section 92 requests as we will run that parallel to the notification process.
If you don’t have any section 92 requests let me know and I will keep you informed of the timeframes as we head towards the hearing and will let you know when reports will need to be prepared by.
Thanks,
Gemma Hayes | Senior Planner North West Resource Consents (Orewa) Ph 09 427 3227 | Mobile 021 723 467 Auckland Council, Pacific Building, 50 Centreway Road, Orewa, Auckland Visit our website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
From: [email protected]
Jacobs File Transfer System
[email protected] has sent you a file archive, with the following message:
2 966 Dear All
Please find attached the the documents lodged on Wednesday 10th October for Matakana Link Road.
Within this link I have also supplied the GIS files for the designation boundary.
Any questions then please do not hesitate to contact me or Tim Hegarty.
Thanks,
Mehmet
If you trust [email protected], use the URL below to pick up the file archive (you may need to copy and paste it into your browser):
Download URL: https://jftt.jacobs.com/download.aspx?ID=a743bb1a-72e6-44b4-afc8- 7a568df4f6d4&RID=e141f591-f79f-41a9-a248-33f1b1d9e38c Download size: 71,252 KB Download contents: designation_bounhdary.zip, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-a- certificateoftitles.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-b-drawingsofproposedworks.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx- matakanalinkroad-appendix-c-landrequirementplan.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-d- objectivesandpolicies.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-e-transportassessmentofeffects.pdf, ix- xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-f-geotechnicalandgroundwaterassessmentofeffects.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx- matakanalinkroad-appendix-g-ecology assessment.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-h- contaminatedlandassessment.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-i-airqualityassessment.pdf, ix- xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-k-noiseandvibrationassessment.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad- appendix-l-archaeologicalassessment.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-m- stormwatermanagement.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-n-constructabilityassessment.pdf, ix- xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-o-proposedconditions.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-appendix-p- visualandlandscapeeffects.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-contaminatedlandassessment-appendix-a-d1.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-contaminatedlandassessment-appendix-d2.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad- contaminatedlandassessment-appendix-e-h.pdf, ix-xxxxxxx-matakanalinkroad-noticeofrequirement- resourceconsentapplication-and-assessmentofenvironmentaleffects.pdf Distribution: To:[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Cc:
You have 7 days to pick up this file archive; after 7 day(s) (Midnight 10/18/2018), it will be deleted. This is an automated e-mail. Thank you for using the Jacobs File Transfer System.
3 967 968 ATTACHMENT 23
LETTER TO AUCKLAND COUNCIL REGARDING IWI ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION
969
970
20 March 2018
Alison Pye and Simon Titter Auckland Council Via email: [email protected] and [email protected]
Dear Alison and Simon,
RE – ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION WITH MANA WHENUA
In response to your emails earlier this week regarding what engagement and consultation has occurred with mana whenua on the Matakana link road Project I provide the following information.
We have undertaken the following consultation with Mana Whenua:
AT have presented project updates to the Northern Hui three times since 2016; the most recent presentation was in February 2018 where we advised that we would be lodging a NoR and associated regional consent applications with Auckland Council for the chosen option at the end of February 2018 and that we will be requesting that these applications are processed on a fully notified basis. AT will continue to update the Northern Hui as the project progresses to significant milestones. Northern Hui members were invited to the long list – short list workshops. All Northern Hui members were invited to prepare Maori Value Assessments; only two responded, namely Te Kawerau a Maki and Ngati Manuhiri.
With respect to the huis, iwi are invited to attend the hui by our Project Managers with projects in a particular local board area. The Matakana link road Project falls within the Rodney Local Board area. The iwi with an interest in the Rodney Local Board area, i.e. those invited to the northern hui are as follows:
Ngati Wai Ngāti Manuhiri Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua Te Uri o Hau Ngāti Whātua o Kaipara Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Ngāi Tai Ki Tāmaki Te Kawerau a Maki Te Akitai Waiohua Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua Ngāti Paoa Ngāti Maru Ngāti Whanaunga
Given the above, and in response to your questions, I note the following:
AT have consulted with all iwi groups who have an interest in the project area. All iwi groups were invited to prepare a MVA; only Te Kawerau a Maki and Ngati Manuhiri provided MVAs. AT have advised both Ngāti Manuhiri and Te Kawerau a Maki of the chosen route and the lodged resource consent and Notice of Requirement applications. AT meet with Ngāti Manuhiri and Te Kawerau a Maki on Thursday 15 March 2018 to discuss the detail of the
20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010 Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142, New Zealand 09 355 3553, www.AT.govt.nz 971
applications lodged and work through how these sat with the values identified by Ngāti Manuhiri and Te Kawerau a Maki in their MVAs. Ngāti Manuhiri and Te Kawerau a Maki have not identified any specific sites of cultural heritage value / wahi tapu or Taonga within the footprint of the Project however it has been noted that there is the potential to identify such features when disturbing land near streams occurs and cultural monitoring has been requested at this stage of the Project. The Mahurangi River itself is identified as an important Taonga; the works occurring within the tributaries of the Mahurangi are therefore of importance to mana whenua. AT intend to circulate a set of draft conditions prior to the hearing. AT will engage with Ngāti Manuhiri and Te Kawerau a Maki when developing these conditions and will provide conditions and/or advice notes enabling the cultural monitoring requirements and accidential discovery protocols requested by Ngāti Manuhiri and Te Kawerau a Maki. There will also be the opportunity for an iwi artist to be involved with the design of artworks to be installed along the proposed bridge structure and/or other places as identified as suitable within the Project corridor.
In addition to the above, AT is trialling the Mauri Model as an alternative for the Multi Criteria Assessment analysis. The Matakana link road Project is being used as an example for this trial; Ngāti Manuhiri are involved with this trial.
The above demonstrates the robust engagement and consultation AT have had with the relevant mana whenua groups with regard to the Matakana link road Project. This consultation and engagement will continue throughout the consenting and construction phase of the project.
Should you require any further information or should you wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Kind Regards,
Diana Bell Senior Planner Auckland Transport
20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010 Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142, New Zealand 09 355 3553, www.AT.govt.nz 972 ATTACHMENT 24
MEETING NOTES – AT AND NZTA DISCUSSION WITH HEALTHY WATERS
973
974 From: Kimdon Nguyen (AT) To: Diana Bell (AT); Gemma Hayes; Stringfield, Sam; Rollo, Duane; Jon Patman; Jack Turner; Shaun Jones; Samuel Holmes Subject: RE: AT and NZTA discussion with Healthy Waters Date: Tuesday, 6 November 2018 10:47:20 AM
Hi Everyone
Thanks for coming along today.
Just a quick confirmation of our key discussion points and actions. Please let me know if you have anything else to add or if I’ve miss interpreted anything.
· Meeting held to discuss potential opportunities for a better integrated SW solution as suggested by AC
· Both AT and NZTA believe the current designs for the wetlands are in the best location · The land owners have raised concerns regarding the impact of the loss of land on the potential light industrial corner site.
· Light industrial application currently proposes treatment at source, AC believe that integration should be considered
· Options discussed for possible integration o Discussed options regarding the culvert design o Discussed options for spreading attenuation requirement up stream · Concluded that changes to the NZTA portion of work could be difficult
ACTIONS th · AT to liaise with land owners regarding SW issues 7 November · Table option for integration which proposes to o Realign the stream adjacent to the road o Integrate AT and Light Industrial requirements · If this is acceptable to the land owners o AT to obtain ecological and Iwi input o AT to draft option solution o Include healthy waters as future asset owner/maintainer o Any changes to designation areas and land requirements would need to be agreed with land owners and may result in slight changes in this area o This needs to be resolved prior to proposed hearing in March 2019 · If solution is not accepted or is unachievable o AT will continue with current proposal
Kind regards
Kimdon Nguyen | Principal Project Manager Major Projects | Integrated Networks 20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010 M 021 409 032
975 www.at.govt.nz
-----Original Appointment----- From: Diana Bell (AT) Sent: Monday, 29 October 2018 3:38 p.m. To: Diana Bell (AT); Gemma Hayes; Alison Pye; Kimdon Nguyen (AT); Stringfield, Sam; Rollo, Duane; Jon Patman; Caleb Perry; Camilla Needham; Belinda Petersen Cc: Jack Turner; Shaun Jones; Samuel Holmes Subject: AT and NZTA discussion with Healthy Waters When: Tuesday, 6 November 2018 09:00-10:00 (UTC+12:00) Auckland, Wellington. Where: Auckland Transport - RES 20 Viaduct 5.08 (10 Seat)
Hi All – I need to change the day and time of this meeting to accommodate those that are not available on Monday. I hope this new time works for all. Thanks.
Hi Camilla
Jon Patman (NZTA) and I have been discussing our projects with Gemma Hayes this afternoon. Gemma mentioned some feedback made by Healthy Waters in relation to our projects; we would like an opportunity to discuss these with you further.
Regards,
Diana
Diana Bell | Senior Planner Planning Integration – Property & Planning | Integrated Networks 20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland Central P 09 355 3553 | DDI 09 448 7171 |M 021 735 096 www.at.govt.nz
Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Auckland Transport.
976 ATTACHMENT 25
PLAN CHANGE 14 EXTRACT
977
978 DRAFT – subject to change
E2. Water quantity, allocation and use … E2.3. Policies [rp] … Water allocation and availability guidelines (5) Manage the taking and use of surface water from rivers, streams and springs and taking and use of groundwater from aquifers to meet all of the following except where water allocation exceeds or is close to exceeding the guidelines (refer to Policy E2.3(1110)):
(a) the minimum flow and availability guidelines in Table 1 River and stream minimum flow and availability in Appendix 2 River and stream minimum flow and availability are not exceeded; and
(b) the aquifer availability and groundwater levels in Table 1 Aquifer water availabilities and Table 2 Interim aquifer groundwater levels in Appendix 3 Aquifer water availabilities and levels are not exceeded.
Take and use of water …
(11) Allow takes that exceed the guidelines in Table 1 River and stream minimum flow and availability in Appendix 2 River and stream minimum flow and availability and Table 1 Aquifer water availabilities and Table 2 Interim aquifer groundwater levels in Appendix 3 Aquifer water availabilities and levels in the following circumstances:
(a) For guidelines in Table 1 River and stream minimum flow and availability in Appendix 2 River and stream minimum flow and availability, when the river or stream flow is greater than the median flow, provided the total take does not exceed 10 per cent of the flow in the river or stream at the time of abstraction, and natural flow variability is maintained; or
(b) For all guidelines, where it is appropriately demonstrated in terms of the requirements of Policy of E2.3(6)(b) or Policy E2.3(7), that additional water is available for allocation.
…
E7. Taking, using, damming and diversion of water and drilling … E7.6.1.10. Diversion of groundwater caused by any excavation, (including trench) or tunnel
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.17 979 DRAFT – subject to change
(1) All of the following activities are exempt from the Standards E7.6.1.10(2) – (6): (a) pipes cables or tunnels including associated structures which are drilled or thrust and are less thanup to 1.2m in external diameter; (b) pipes including associated structures up to 1.5m in external diameter where a closed faced or earth pressure balanced machine is used; (c) piles up to 1.5m in external diameter are exempt from these standards; (d) diversions for no longer than 10 days; or (e) diversions for network utilities and road network linear trenching activities that are progressively opened, closed and stabilised where the part of the trench that is open at any given time is no longer than 10 days. … E7.6.3.3. Take and use of groundwater …
(2) The replacement of an existing resource consent to take and use groundwater for municipal water supply purposes:
(a) at the time of the application, the take is an authorised take;
(b) a water management plan has been prepared;
(c) the take will not result in the water availabilities and levels in Table 1 Aquifer water availabilities and Table 2 Aquifer groundwater levels, in Appendix 3 Aquifer water availabilities and levels being exceeded, except in accordance with E2 Water quantity, allocation and use Policy E2.3(9)(11); and
(d) the take must not be from an area in the Wetland Management Areas Overlay.
…
E7.7.2. Assessment criteria The Council will consider the relevant assessment criteria below for controlled activities: (1) all controlled activities: (a) the extent to which any effects on Mana Whenua values are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
…
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.18 980 DRAFT – subject to change
(4) new bores for purposes not otherwise specified: (a) the options for the location, depth and design of the bore and the design of the head works to avoid adverse effects on the groundwater resource and other groundwater users;
(b) the options to locate and design the bore and the head works to avoid adverse effects on any scheduled historic heritage places;
(c) the most effective method to identify the bore; and
(d) an effective programme of maintenance for the bore; and.
(e) [deleted] demonstrates consultation and engagement with Mana Whenua.
…
E7.8.2. Assessment criteria The Council will consider the relevant assessment criteria below for restricted discretionary activities: … (5) Whether the proposal provides mitigation options where there are significant adverse effects on the matters identified in E7.8.2(4)(3) and (5)(4) above, including the following: (a) consideration of alternative locations, rates and timing of takes for both surface water and groundwater;
…
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.19 981 DRAFT – subject to change
E8. Stormwater - Discharge and diversion … E8.6.2.1. Diversion of stormwater runoff from lawfully established impervious areas directed into an authorised stormwater network or a combined sewer network (1) The impervious area wasis lawfully established as of the date this rule becomes operative; or
(2) tThe diversion does not increase stormwater runoff to the combined sewer network; or
(3) The diversion increases stormwater runoff to the combined sewer network and (unless the increase is approved by the combined sewer network operator).
… E8.6.4. Restricted discretionary activity standards Activities listed as restricted discretionary in Table E8.4.1 Activity table must comply with the following restricted activity standard. E8.6.4.1. Diversion and discharge of stormwater runoff from additional impervious areas greater than 5,000m2 of road (which include road ancillary areas that are part of a road, motorway or state highway operated by a road controlling authority) or rail corridor …
(3) Where stormwater runoff from an impervious area is discharged into a stream receiving environment, it must be managed by a stormwater management device to meet the hydrology mitigation requirements E10.6.3.1.1(1) specified for Stormwater management area - Flow 1 in Table E10.6.3.1.1 Hydrology mitigation requirements, except as provided for in E10.6.3.1.1(2).
(4) Stormwater management devices must be provided to reduce or remove contaminants from stormwater runoff.
…
E9. Stormwater quality - High contaminant generating car parks and high use roads … E9.6.1.3. Development of a new or redevelopment of an existing high contaminant generating car park greater than 1,000m2 and up to 5,000m2
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.20 982 DRAFT – SUBJECT TO CHANGE
…
(2) Stormwater management device(s) must meet the following standards:
(a) the device or system must be sized and designed in accordance with Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)’; or
(b) where alternative devices are proposed, the device must demonstrate it is designed to achieve an equivalent level of contaminant or sediment removal performance to that of Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)’.
(3) Stormwater runoff from the impervious area used for the high contaminant generating car park is treated by stormwater management device(s) meeting Standard E9.6.1.3(2) above.
(4) Where the car park is more than 50 per cent of the total impervious area of the site, stormwater runoff from the total impervious area on the site must be treated by stormwater management device(s) meeting Standard E9.6.1.3(2) above.
…
E9.6.1.4. Development of a new or redevelopment of an existing high use road greater than 1,000m2 and up to 5,000m2 (1) Stormwater runoff from a new high use road, and any additional area of road discharging to the same drainage network point(s), must be treated by a Stormwater Management Device meeting the following:
(a) the device or system must be sized and designed in accordance with Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)’; or
(b) where alternative devices are proposed, the device must demonstrate it is designed to achieve an equivalent level of contaminant or sediment removal performance to that of Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)’.
…
E9.6.2. Controlled activity
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.21 983 DRAFT – SUBJECT TO CHANGE
All controlled activities in Table E9.4.1 Activity table must comply with the following activity specific standards. E9.6.2.1. Development of a new or redevelopment of an existing high contaminant generating car park greater than 5,000m2 …
(3) Where a high contaminant generating car park is more than 50 per cent of the total impervious area of a site, stormwater runoff from the total impervious area on the site must be treated by stormwater management device(s).
(4) The stormwater management device(s) must meet the following:
(a) the device or system must be sized and designed in accordance with Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)’; or
(b) where alternative devices are proposed, the device must demonstrate it is designed to achieve an equivalent level of contaminant or sediment removal performance to that of Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)’.
E9.6.2.2. Development of a new or redevelopment of an existing high use road greater than 5,000m2 (1) Stormwater runoff from the impervious area is treated by stormwater management device(s).
(2) Stormwater management device(s) must meet the following:
(a) the device or system must be sized and designed in accordance with Auckland Councils Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)’; or
(b) where alternative devices are proposed, the device must demonstrate it is designed to achieve an equivalent level of contaminant or sediment removal performance to that of Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)’.
…
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.22 984 DRAFT – SUBJECT TO CHANGE
ATTACHMENT A.4 – NATURAL RESOURCES
Showing proposed amendments as tracked changes for Chapters: E11 Land disturbance - Regional E12 Land disturbance - District E14 Air quality E15 Vegetation management and biodiversity E17 Trees in Roads
Changes to Chapter E17 Trees in Roads are consequential from changes to chapter E26 Infrastructure Consequential changes are made to Chapter E26 Infrastructure from the changes here for Chapter E15 Vegetation management and biodiversity
E11 Land disturbance – Regional … E11.2. Objectives [rp] (1) Land disturbance is undertaken in a manner that protects the safety of people and avoids, remedies andor mitigates adverse effects on the environment.
… E11.3. Policies [rp] … (2) Manage land disturbance to:
… (c) avoid, remedy andor mitigate adverse effects on accidentally discovered sensitive material; and
… (6A) Recognise and provide for the management and control of kauri dieback as a means of maintaining indigenous biodiversity.
…
E11.6.2. General standards … (2) Best practice erosion and sediment control measures must be implemented for the duration of the land disturbance. Those measures must be installed prior to the commencement of land disturbance and maintained until the site is stabilised against erosion.
Note 1
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.23 985 DRAFT – SUBJECT TO CHANGE
Best practice in Auckland is generally deemed to be compliance with Auckland Council Technical Publication 90 Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region ‘Guidance Document 2016/005 Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Land Disturbing Activities (GD05)’ or similar design. … E11.6.3. Standards for ancillary farming earthworks … (2) Ancillary farming earthworks must implement best practice erosion and sediment control measures for the duration of the land disturbance. Those measures must be installed prior to the commencement of the land disturbance and maintained until the site is stabilised against erosion. Note 1 Industry best practice is generally deemed to meet or exceed compliance with:
• cultivation for vegetable production: The Horticulture New Zealand publication ‘Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Vegetable Production’ (June 2014) for cultivation; or
• for ancillary farming earthworks other than cultivation: ‘Auckland Council Technical Publication 90 Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region’ Auckland Council ‘Guidance Document 2016/005 Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Land Disturbing Activities (GD05)’ or similar design for other ancillary farming earthworks.
… (4) To prevent the spread of contaminated soil and organic material with kauri dieback disease, vehicle and equipment hygiene procedures must be adopted when working within 3 times the radius of the canopy drip line of a New Zealand kauri tree. Soil and organic material from land disturbance within 3 times the radius of the canopy drip line must not be transported beyond that area unless being transported to landfill for disposal.
E11.6.4. Standards for ancillary forestry earthworks Ancillary forestry earthworks listed as a permitted activity in Table E11.4.1, Table E11.4.2 or Table E11.4.3 must comply with the following permitted activity standards. … (15) To prevent the spread of contaminated soil and organic material with kauri dieback disease, vehicle and equipment hygiene procedures must be adopted when working within 3 times the radius of the canopy drip line of a New Zealand kauri tree. Soil and organic material from land disturbance within 3
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.24 986 DRAFT – SUBJECT TO CHANGE
times the radius of the canopy drip line must not be transported beyond that area unless being transported to landfill for disposal. …
E11.8. Assessment – restricted discretionary activities E11.8.1. Matters of discretion The Council will restrict its discretion to all of the following matters when assessing a restricted discretionary resource consent application: (1) All restricted discretionary activities: (a) compliance with the standards;
(b) the design and suitability of erosion and sediment control measures to be implemented;
(c) adverse effects of land disturbance and sediment discharge on water bodies, particularly sensitive receiving environments;
…
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.25 987 DRAFT – SUBJECT TO CHANGE
… E15.6. Standards All activities listed as a permitted, controlled or restricted discretionary activity in Table E15.4.1 or Table E15.4.2 must comply with the following standards.
E15.6.A1. General standards The following standards apply to all permitted, controlled or restricted discretionary activities. (1) All kauri material (including sawdust and woodchips) must be retained within 3 times the radius of the canopy drip line of the tree or disposed of to an approved landfill facility.
E15.6.1. [deleted]Deadwood removal (1) All kauri deadwood material (including sawdust and woodchips) must be retained on site or disposed of to an approved landfill facility. …
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A3.33 988
ATTACHMENT A.5 - INFRASTRUCTURE
Showing proposed amendments as tracked changes for Chapters: D26 National Grid Corridor Overlay E26 Infrastructure
Changes to E26 Infrastructure include consequential changes from Chapter D13 Notable trees. Consequential changes from E26 Infrastructure can be found in: Attachment A.2 Built heritage and character for chapter D19 Auckland War Memorial Museum Viewshaft Overlay, and Attachment A.4 Natural resources for chapter E17 Trees in Roads
D26. National Grid Corridor Overlay
D26.1. Overlay description
The National Grid is important to the social and economic well-being of Aucklanders and New Zealanders. All infrastructure owned or operated by Transpower New Zealand Limited comprises the National Grid.
…
The areas within the National Grid Yard (Compromised and Uncompromised) are shown on the planning maps. The National Grid Yard (Uncompromised) areas are not generally compromised by the presence of existing buildings and are subject to limitations on new development. The National Grid Yard (Compromised) areas are generally compromised by the presence of existing buildings and are subject to fewer limitations than the National Grid Yard (Uncompromised). All parts of the National Grid Yard are subject to limitations on new activities sensitive to the National Grid. The location of the National Grid Corridor Overlay must be updated if any National Grid line, support structure or substation is relocated or removed or if the site boundary of a substation reduces in size. …
D26.4. Activity table
Table D26.4.1 Activity table – within the National Grid Yard specifies the activity status for use, development and subdivision activities within the National Grid Yard pursuant to sections 9(3) and 11 of the Resource Management Act 1991. …
For subdivision within the National Grid Corridor overlay, the relevant zone rules in E38 Subdivision – Urban or E39 Subdivision – Rural, D26.6.2 (controlled activity development standards) and D26.8 (Assessment - restricted discretionary activities) apply. A blank in Table D26.4.1 below means that the Auckland-wide subdivision provisions apply.
The National Grid Corridor Overlay rules cease to have effect and the maps can be updated accordingly where: (a) a National Grid line or part of a line is dismantled, undergrounded or moved; or
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.35 989
(b) a National Grid substation is dismantled or the site boundary of a National Grid substation reduces in size; and Transpower New Zealand Limited has advised the Council in writing that the National Grid Corridor Overlay provisions are no longer required for that line or part of that line, or for that substation or that part of that substation.
Table D26.4.1 Activity table – within the National Grid Yard (Compromised and Uncompromised) ….
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.36 990
E26. Infrastructure [ENV-2016-AKL-000243: K Vernon] – Addition sought E26.1 Introduction and other relevant regulatory requirements E26.1.1 Introduction …
E26.2.2. Policies [rp/dp] …
(7) Enable the following activities within natural heritage, natural resources, coastal environment, historic heritage, historic special character and Mana Whenua cultural heritage overlays: …
E26.2.3 Activity table Table E26.2.3.1 Activity table specifies the activity status of land use and development activities in all zones and roads pursuant to sections 9(2) and 9(3) of the Resource Management Act 1991.
• Network utilities include road network activities within the legal road and its formation width, unless otherwise stated in the activity table. Table E26.2.3.1 Activity table - Network utilities and electricity generation – All zones and roads Transport Corridor Zone Corridor Transport Roads Purpose Special and Zone Urban Future Rural zones, (land) Zone Port Minor – Coastal and (land) Zone – Marina Coastal Zone School Zone Purpose – Māori Purpose Special zones, Residential Z one Business General – the and Business zones Industrial Zone Education – Tertiary Purpose Special and Zone Park – Business Business Zone, Hospital and Facility – Healthcare Purpose Special Zone, Facility Recreation – Major Purpose Special Zone, Airfields and – Airports Purpose Special Zone, Use – Mixed Business zones, Centres – Purpose the and Special zones space Open
Activity Cemetery Zone Cemetery , u nformed roads nformed
and Special Purpose – Purpose Special and –
Quarry Zone Quarry
and the Strategic Strategic the and
General
…
(A23) Pole mounted transformer * P P RD RD RD RD * within areas of the Road, Unformed Road and P*** P** the Strategic Transport Corridor Zone, this activity shall have the same status as the adjacent zone ** Industrial zones *** within the areas of the Roads and Unformed Roads and Strategic Transport Corridor Zone, in rural and coastal towns; and serviced and un- serviced villages.
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.37 991
*** in those zones that are located outside the RUB, and within areas of the Road, Unformed Road and the Strategic Transport Corridor Zone adjacent to those zones.
….
(A36) Antennas that do not exceed the following P P P P P P P dimensions: GPS Antennas: • 300mm high and 130mm in diameter • small cell units/antennas that do not exceed a volumetric dimension of 0.25m3 Omni-directional whip or dipole antennas: • 650mm high; • 650mm horizontal length for dipole antennas; and • Whip or cross rod section of 60mm in diameter …
(A51) Water, wastewater and stormwater pump stations P P P P P P P
(A51A Water, wastewater and stormwater pump stations NA P P C P C RD# ) that do not comply with standards E26.2.5.2(2)(a) *RD# or E26.2.5.2 (3)(a) *Centres zones and Business – Mixed Use Zone
(A52) Water, wastewater and stormwater storage tanks P P P P P P P
….
… E26.2.5. Standards E26.2.5.1 Activities within roads and unformed roads in Table E26.2.3.1 Activity table All activities listed as permitted in Table E26.2.3.1 Activity table must comply with the following permitted activity standards. …
(3) Height:
(a) the maximum height for structures, excluding electricity and telecommunication support structures, telecommunication devices, earth peaks, lightning rods, smart meters and GPS antennas is 1.8m;
(b) the maximum height for support structures for electricity lines, telecommunication lines, telecommunication equipment/devices, including telecommunication equipment/devices is 25m. This measurement of height of the structure excludes any earth peaks, lightning rods, smart meters, omni-directional whip antennas and GPS antennas; and
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.38 992
(c) the maximum height for of 2.5m applies to:
(i) telecommunication kiosk; and
(ii) distribution substations that specifically connect between networks operating at different voltages or phase angles, and are located outside of urban areas.
…
E26.2.5.2 Activities within zones in Table E26.2.3.1 Activity table All activities listed as permitted in Table E26.2.3.1 Activity table must comply with the following permitted activity standards. …
(3) Height:
(a) the maximum height for structures, excluding electricity and telecommunication support structures, telecommunication devices, earth peaks, lightning rods, smart meters and GPS antennas, is 2.5m. Excludes:
(i) structures in industrial zones, where the height controls of the relevant zone will apply;
(ii) substations and telephone exchanges incorporated within a building complying with the rules for the relevant zone or otherwise approved; and
(iii) telecommunication shelters and electricity storage facilities in rural zones, where a maximum height of 3m applies.
(b) the maximum height for support structures for electricity lines and telecommunication lines is 25m.
…
E26.2.5.3 Specific activities within zones in Table E26.2.3.1 The specific activities listed below are required to comply with the permitted activity standards in E26.2.5.1 and E26.2.5.2. Where a standard in E26.2.5.3 for a specified activity varies from a standard in E26.2.5.1 or E26.2.5.2, E26.2.5.3 shall apply.
Minor infrastructure upgrading (1) Minor infrastructure upgrading of network utilities must comply with the following controls (where relevant):
(a) minor re-alignment, configuration, relocation or replacement of electricity, gas distribution, or telecommunication line, pipe, pole,
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.39 993
conductors, cross arms, switches, transformers, cabinets or ancillary structures:
(i) that is within 2m of the existing alignment or location;
(ii) that is within 5m of the existing alignment or location when associated with road widening reasons or road safety or electricity clearance reasons.
(b) alterations and additions to overhead electricity and telecommunication lines on existing poles:
(i) do not increase the number of conductors or wires/lines by more than 100 percent;
(ii) or when installing a new low voltage circuit on an existing pole, the total number of new conductors or wires/lines must not exceed 8, consisting specifically of 4 lines for electricity circuit (or a single bundled line containing all 4 electricity lines), 1 hot water pilot line, 1 street light line, and 2 for telecommunication purposes. Where the hot water pilot and street light lines are not required, the maximum number of new conductors must not exceed 6.
(iii) the provisions in E26.2.5.3(1)(b)(i) and E26.2.5.3(1)(b)(ii) above exclude service connections and lateral network connections
(iv) additional cross arms that do not exceed the length of the existing cross arm by more than 100 percent, up to a maximum of 4m; and
(v) additional or replacement electricity and telecommunication lines that:
• do not exceed 30mm in diameter; or
• in the case of a single bundled line containing all 4 electricity lines provided for under E26.2.5.3(1)(b)(ii), does not exceed 44mm in diameter.
…
Substations and electricity storage facilities (2) Noise from substations must not exceed the following noise limits when measured within the boundary of a residential zone site or within the notional boundary of a rural zone site: (a) 55 dB LAeq between Monday to Saturday 7am to 10pm and Sundays 9am to 6pm and (b) 45 dB LAeq/75 dB LAmax for all other times (2A) Noise from electricity storage facilities must not exceed: (a) The noise limits in E26.2.5.3(2) when the electricity storage facility is located on the same site as a substation and the noise levels are assessed cumulatively; or
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.40 994
(b) The following noise limits when measured within the boundary of a residential zone site or within the notional boundary of a rural zone site: (i) 50 dB LAeq between Monday to Saturday 7am to 10pm and Sundays 9am to 6pm and (ii) 40 dB LAeq/75 dB LAmax for all other times. (3) Noise from substations and electricity storage facilities received in other zones must not exceed the noise limits for the zone in which the receiver is located as provided in E25 Noise and vibration. (4) Noise from distribution substations within roads, unformed roads and Strategic Transport Corridor Zone must not exceed 40 dB LAeq at 6m from the distribution substation or at the nearest residential boundary or rural notional boundary, whichever is the furthest. (4) Noise from distribution substations and electricity storage facilities within roads, unformed roads and the Strategic Transport Corridor Zone must not exceed 40 dB LAeq at: (a) 6m from the distribution substation or electricity storage facility; or
(b) any residential boundary or rural notional boundary where those boundaries are further than 6m from the distribution substation or electricity storage facility.
(5) In respect of E26.2.5.3(3) and (4) above noise levels must be measured in accordance with NZS6801:2008 “Acoustics – Measurement of environmental sound” and assessed in accordance with NZS6802:2008 “Acoustics – Environmental noise”.
…
E26.2.5.4 Standards for road network activities in Table E26.2.3.2 The following permitted activity standards apply to activities within Table E26.2.3.2 Activity table for road network activities in the existing road. (1) Temporary works, buildings and structures must be removed from the road on completion of works.
(2) After completion of works, the ground must be reinstated to at least the condition existing prior to any work starting.
(3) Work within the formation width of the road must be incidental to, and serve a supportive function for the existing public road or is required for the safety of road users or is required for the safety of adjacent landowners or occupiers.
(4) Road network activities involving the construction, renewal or minor upgrading of road pavement (excluding footpaths), bridges, retaining walls and tunnels, that are within 20m of any building or structure that is listed as a primary feature in Schedule 14.1, shall prepare a vibration management plan. The plan shall be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced person and shall demonstrate that vibration levels in E25.6.30 (1)(a) German Industrial Standard DIN 4150-3(1999):Structural
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.41 995
vibration – Part 3 Effects of vibration on structures will be complied with. The plan must include the information set out in E26.8.8 and be provided to the council no less than 5 days prior to the works commencing.
E26.2.5.5 Controlled activity standards All activities listed as controlled in Table E26.2.3.1 Activity table must comply with the following controlled activity standards. ….
Substations within new or existing buildings and water, wastewater and stormwater pump stations that do not comply with standards E26.2.5.2(2)(a) or E26.2.5.2(3)(a) (2) Substations within new buildings, and substations within existing buildings that require an increase in building platform area or building height, and water, wastewater and stormwater pump stations that do not comply with standards E26.2.5.2(2)(a) or E26.2.5.2(3)(a):
(d) the substation building or pumping station must comply with the standards for the relevant zone; and
(e) noise from substations must not exceed the noise limits in Standards E26.2.5.3(2) - (5).
E26.2.6 Assessment – controlled activities E26.2.6.1 Matters of control The Council will reserve its control to all the following matters when assessing a controlled activity resource consent application: … (3) substations within new buildings, and substations within existing buildings that require an increase in building platform area or building height, and water, wastewater and stormwater pump stations that do not comply with standards E26.2.5.2(2)(a) or E26.2.5.2(3)(a):
(a) external building appearance;
(b) landscaping and fencing;
(c) compliance with Standard E26.2.5.5(2); and
(d) effects on health and safety.
E26.2.6.2 Assessment criteria The Council will consider the relevant assessment criteria for controlled activities from the list below:
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.42 996
…
(3) substations within new buildings, and substations within existing buildings that require an increase in building platform area or building height and water, wastewater and stormwater pump stations that do not comply with standards E26.2.5.2(2)(a) or E26.2.5.2(3)(a):
(a) whether Standard E26.2.5.5(2) is complied with;
(b) the extent to which design features can be used to break up the bulk of the building by, for example varying building elevations, setting parts of the building back, and the use of architectural features without compromising the functional requirements of the pumping station or substation;
(c) the extent to which the visual effects of the building can be softened by landscaping without compromising the functional requirements of the pumping station or substation; and
(d) the extent to which fencing can be used to minimise potential health and safety hazards.
E26.2.7 Assessment – restricted discretionary activities E26.2.7.1 Matters of discretion The Council will reserve its discretion to all of the following matters when assessing a restricted discretionary resource consent application: …
(2) substations within new buildings, and substations within existing buildings that require an increase in building platform area or building height, and water, wastewater and stormwater pump stations that do not comply with standards E26.2.5.2(2)(a) or E26.2.5.2(3)(a):
(i) effects of external building appearance on amenity values of the streetscape and adjoining properties; and
(ii) effects on health and safety.
…
E26.2.7.2 Assessment criteria The Council will consider the relevant assessment criteria below for restricted discretionary activities: … (2) substations within new buildings, and substations within existing buildings that require an increase in building platform area or building height, and
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.43 997
water, wastewater and stormwater pump stations that do not comply with standards E26.2.5.2(2)(a) or E26.2.5.2(3)(a):
(a) the extent to which design features can be used to break up the bulk of the building by, for example varying building elevations, setting parts of the building back, and the use of architectural features without compromising the functional requirements of the pumping station or substation;
(b) the extent to which the visual effects of the building can be softened by landscaping without compromising the functional requirements of the pumping station or substation; and
(c) the extent to which fencing can be used to minimise potential health and safety hazards.
…
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.44 998
E26.3 Network utilities and electricity generation – Vegetation management E26.3.1 Objectives … E26.3.3 Activity table Table E26.3.3.1 Activity table specifies the activity status of land use and development activities pursuant to sections 9(2) and 9(3) of the Resource Management Act 1991 in the:
• rural zones, coastal areas and riparian margins areas (for the meaning of ‘coastal areas’ and ‘riparian areas’, refer to E15 Vegetation management and biodiversity and in particular Table E15.4.1 Activity table - Auckland-wide vegetation and biodiversity management rules);
• D9 Significant Ecological Areas Overlay; (SEA) • D10 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay and Outstanding Natural Landscapes Overlay; and (ONF) and (ONL)
• D11 Outstanding Natural Character Overlay and High Natural Character Overlay; (ONC) and (HNC) … E26.3.4A General Standard All activities listed as permitted, or restricted discretionary in Table E26.3.3.1 must comply with the following standard.
Disposal of kauri material (1) All kauri material (including sawdust and woodchips) must be retained on site according to best practice or disposed of to an approved landfill facility.
E26.3.5 Permitted activity standards Standards All activities listed as permitted in Table E26.3.3.1 Activity table must comply with the following permitted activity standards. Regional [rp]
Permitted activity standards for vegetation management in rural zones, coastal areas, riparian areas margins and the Significant Ecological Areas Overlay …
E26.3.5.2 Vegetation alteration or removal (1) Vegetation alteration or removal must not include trees over 6m in height, or 600mm in girth unless their removal is otherwise permitted by a rule in this Plan.
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.45 999
(2) Must not result in the removal of more than 20m2 of vegetation within a significant ecological area, except within the formation width of the road.
[Deleted]
(3) Must not result in the removal of more than 50m2 of vegetation within a coastal area or riparian area margin not identified as a significant ecological area.
…
(7) Vegetation alteration or removal from a significant ecological area must be for the purpose of;
(a) the operation, maintenance, renewal, repair or removal of network utilities or electricity generation facilities or minor infrastructure upgrading and not result in the removal of more than 20m2 of vegetation, except within the formation width of the road; or
(b) the operation, maintenance, renewal, repair or removal of network utilities or electricity generation facilities or minor infrastructure upgrading and must be undertaken in any of the following:
(i) within the formation width of existing roads, except where Standard E26.3.5.2(4) applies; or
(ii) within 1m of the network utility, or existing access track; or
(iii) in accordance with the Electricity (Hazards from Trees) Regulations 2003; or
(c) maintaining the safety of the network utility and must be undertaken in any of the following:
(i) within state highway designations as at 30 September 2013; or
(ii) within railway designations as at 30 September 2013; or
(d) installing a service connection and must not result in the removal of more than 10m2 of vegetation.
be for the purpose of maintaining the safety of the network utility and must be undertaken in any of the following:
(a) within the formation width of existing roads;
(b) within 1m of the network utility, or existing access track;
(c) in accordance with the Electricity (Hazards from Trees) Regulations 2003;
(d) within state highway designations as at 30 September 2013; or
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.46 1000
(e) within railway designations as at 30 September 2013.
(8) Standards E26.3.5.2(1)-(7) do not apply to vegetation alteration or removal required to maintain the visibility of road safety signage, vehicle sightlines, carriageway clearance heights and widths as follows:
(a) clearance of 4.5m height above the road carriage way or up to 5.3m where there is an overhead road signage 0.5m above any traffic signal, or road safety and directional signage located above the road carriageway;
(b) clearance of a 0.5m width back from the road kerb;
(c) clearance of a 0.6m width back from the un-kerbed road; or
(d) clearance for any over dimension route requirement.
District [dp]
Permitted Activity Standards for vegetation management in the Outstanding Natural Features Overlay, Outstanding Natural Landscapes Overlay and Outstanding Natural Character and High Natural Character Overlay …
E26.3.5.4. Vegetation alteration or removal …
(5) Standards E26.3.5.4(1)-(4) do not apply to vegetation alteration or removal required to maintain the visibility of road safety signage, vehicle sightlines, carriageway clearance heights and widths as follows:
(a) clearance of 4.5m height above the road carriage way or up to 5.3m where there is an overhead road signage 0.5m above any traffic signal, or road safety and directional signage located above the road carriageway;
(b) clearance of a 0.5m width back from the road kerb;
(c) clearance of a 0.6m width back from the un-kerbed road; or
(d) clearance for any over dimension route requirement.
…
E26.3.7 Assessment – restricted discretionary activities E26.3.7.1 Matters of discretion The Council will reserve its discretion to all of the following matters when assessing a restricted discretionary resource consent application:
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.47 1001
(1) regional rules - vegetation management in rural zones, coastal areas, riparian areas margins and the Significant Ecological Areas Overlay that do not comply with the permitted activity standards [rp]:
(a) ecological values:
(i) the effects that the vegetation alteration or removal will have on ecological values, including on threatened species and ecosystems.
(aa) hazard mitigation:
(i) the role of the vegetation in avoiding or mitigating natural hazards and the extent to which the vegetation alteration or removal will increase any hazard risk.
…
E26.3.7.2 Assessment criteria The Council will consider the relevant assessment criteria below for restricted discretionary activities: (1) regional rules - vegetation management in rural zones, coastal areas, riparian areas margins and the D9 Significant Ecological Areas Overlay that do not comply with the permitted activity standards [rp]:
(a) ecological values:
(i) the extent to which the vegetation alteration or removal is minimised and adverse effects on the ecological and indigenous biodiversity values of the vegetation are able to be avoided, remedied or mitigated;
(ii) whether vegetation removal will have an adverse effect on threatened species or ecosystems; and
(iii) the extent to which the proposal for vegetation alteration or removal has taken into account relevant objectives and policies in D9 Significant Ecological Areas Overlay, D10 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay and Outstanding Natural Landscapes Overlay and E15 Vegetation management and biodiversity.
(aa) hazard mitigation:
(i) the extent to which the vegetation alteration or removal will increase natural hazard risks.
….
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A5.48 1002
ATTACHMENT A.11 - APPENDICES
Showing proposed amendments as tracked changesfor Chapter M. Appendix 2 River and stream minimum flow and availability Appendix 17 Documents incorporated by reference
Changes shown below to Appendix 17 are consequential changes from Chapter E11 Land disturbance – Regional and E9 Stormwater quality - High contaminant generating car parks and high use roads.
Appendix 2 River and stream minimum flow and availability All provisions in this appendix are regional plan [rp]. Table 1 River and stream minimum flow and availability River or stream Minimum Availability flow … Mahurangi 2 35 l/s - (at 6 Brown Rd site) Wairoa 340 l/s - (as measured at Tourist Rd recording site) Puhinui 14 l/s 35 l/s (at 356 Puhinui Rd site)
Hōteo 3 175 l/s - (at 47 Wilson Rd site) Other rivers and streams 85% of MALF 30% of MALF
Note 1 Requires mitigation such as riparian planting to achieve the same environmental outcomes as for ‘other rivers and streams’, otherwise the minimum flow and availability for ‘other rivers and streams’ applies. Note 2 Mahurangi as calculated from the College Weir recording site, adjusted for the net abstraction for municipal supply. Note 3
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A11.90 1003
Hōteo as correlated to the measured flow at the Gubbs recording site.
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A11.91 1004
Appendix 17 Documents incorporated by reference … E9 Stormwater quality - High contaminant generating car parks and high use roads Auckland Council Technical Publication 10: Design Guideline Manual for Stormwater Treatment Devices (2003) ‘Guidance Document 2017/001 Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01) December 2017’
E11 Land disturbance - Regional Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Electricity Transmission Activities) Regulations 2009 National Environmental Standards for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health 2011 Auckland Council Technical Publication 90 Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region ‘Guidance Document 2016/005 Erosion and Sediment Control Guideline for Land Disturbing Activities (GD05)’ Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Vegetable Production Horticulture New Zealand (June 2014) …
28 November 2018 PPC14_Plan_Change 14 A11.92 1005 1006 ATTACHMENT 26
NOR RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
1007
1008
Proposed Amendments to NoR Conditions (Words added are underlined)
1. Notice of Requirement Conditions
1.1 General conditions
Designation lapse
1. In accordance with section 184(1)(c) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the “RMA”), this designation will lapse if not given effect to within 5 years from the date on which it is included in the Auckland Unitary Plan.
Designation Drawback
Xx The Project shall be designed and constructed and mitigation incorporated as necessary to ensure that the operational noise levels from the Project do not exceed 53dB LAeq(24hr) when measured at the most exposed part of any playing surface of any sports field in use as at February 2019 at the Warkworth Showgrounds. The noise level shall be based on predicted traffic flows for the Project only for the year 2036 and shall be modelled in accordance with NZS6806:2010.
Approved Application Documents
2. The scope and extent of the works within the designation are to be carried out in general accordance with the plans and all information submitted with the Notice of Requirement as detailed below:
a) Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018;
b) Transport Assessment prepared by Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018;
c) Constructability assessment prepared by Andy Wright Project Services Limited, dated October 2018;
d) Geotechnical and Groundwater Assessment prepared by Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018
e) Ecological Effects Assessment prepared by Bioresearchers Limited, dated October 2018;
f) Preliminary Site Investigation prepared by Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018;
g) Air Quality Assessment prepared by Jacobs Limited, dated October 2018;
h) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by AECOM Limited, dated October 2018;
i) Noise and Vibration Assessment prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics, dated October 2018;
j) Archaeology Assessment prepared by Clough and Associates, dated October 2018;
k) Stormwater Assessment Report prepared by AECOM Limited dated October 2018;
l) Visual and Landscape Assessment prepared by Isthmus Group, dated October 2018; and the following plans
i 1009
Where there is a conflict between the documents listed above and the designation conditions, the conditions will prevail.
Outline Plan of Works
3. The requiring authority must submit an outline plan or plans prior to construction of Stages 1 and 2 of the Project, in accordance with section 176A of the RMA.
4. Within Stages 1 and 2, the outline plans may be submitted in stages to reflect any proposed staging of the physical works.
5. The outline plan or plans are also to include the following management plans for the relevant stage(s) of development:
a) Construction Environmental Management Plan ("CEMP");
b) Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan ("CVNMP"); and
c) Urban Design and Landscape Management Plan (“USLMP”).
6. Where a management plan is required as listed in Condition 5 above, the management plan shall be implemented, complied with, and maintained throughout the duration of the relevant construction period.2
7. At least 20 working days prior to commencement of construction of any stage of the Project, the requiring authority must submit the management plans required by Condition 5 to be certified (unless otherwise specified in these conditions) to Auckland Council, for the Council to certify that they comply or are consistent with the relevant designation condition(s).
8. If the requiring authority does not receive any response from the Council within 10 working days of the management plans stated in Condition 5 being submitted for certification, the requiring authority will be deemed to have certification and can commence the relevant works, stage or activity.
9. At any time, the requiring authority is entitled to update or to revise any management plans, required to be certified by the Council, including for a new project stage, if there is a material change required to the document or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction and/or unresolved complaints. The requiring authority must submit the updated or revised document to the Council for certification at least five working days prior to the new stage of the project commencing or as soon as practicable following identification of the need for a material change during construction, (whichever is relevant). If the requiring authority has not received a response (short of certification) from the Council within five working days of submitting the revised information, the consent holder will be deemed to have certification and can commence the works, stage or activity.
Advice note: Modifications to the CEMP and associated management plans as a result of such reviews can be made as an update to this ‘live’ document. The plans can be prepared as a combined document that also addresses the matters required under the associated resource consents for the Project.
1010
Construction conditions
Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP)
10. Conditions 11 to 20 relate to construction of the Project and only apply to construction activities. Once construction of the Project is complete these conditions, unless otherwise specified in a condition, will no longer apply and can be removed.
11. Prior to the commencement of any stage of the Project, the Requiring Authority shall prepare and implement a CEMP.
12. The purpose of the CEMP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects associated with the construction works for both Stages 1 and 2 of the Project. All works are to be carried out in accordance with the certified CEMP required by these conditions and in accordance with any certified changes to plans.
13. In order to give effect to its objective, the CEMP is to provide for the following:
a) Methods for managing and monitoring dust as a nuisance, including methods for minimising dust emissions, monitoring procedures and contingency procedures in the event of a dust nuisance event;
b) Measures to be adopted to keep the construction areas in a tidy condition in terms of disposal / storage of rubbish and storage, unloading construction materials (including equipment). All storage of materials and equipment associated with the construction works must take place within the boundaries of the designation;
c) How the construction yards are to be fenced and kept secure;
d) The location and specifications of any temporary acoustic fences where necessary;
e) The location of any temporary buildings (including workers’ offices and portaloos) and vehicle parking (which should be located in the construction area and not on adjacent streets);
f) Methods to ensure prevention and mitigation of adverse effects associated with the storage, use, disposal, or transportation of hazardous substances;
g) Training requirements for employees, sub-contractor and visitors on construction procedures, environmental management and monitoring;
h) The document management system for administering the CEMP, including review and Requiring Authority / constructor / Council requirements;
i) Environmental incident and emergency management procedures (including spills);
j) Environmental complaint management procedures;
k) An outline of the construction programme of the work, including construction hours of operation, indicating linkages to the other management plans which address the management of adverse effects during construction; and
l) Methods to provide for the safety of the general public.
1011
m) Measures to avoid construction traffic through the Hill Street intersection during the weekday peak periods (between 4:30 and 5:30pm)
Construction Traffic Management Plan
14. The purpose of the CTMP is to:
a) Manage the road transport network for the duration of construction to manage congestion and minimise delays to road users;
b) Inform the public about traffic management on the road transport network for the duration of construction;
c) Protect public safety including the safe passage of pedestrians and cyclists;
d) Maintain pedestrian access to private property at all times;
e) Provide vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible; and
f) Manage traffic effects from construction yards on adjacent properties.
The CTMP must contain the following:
a) The road routes to be used by construction related vehicles, particularly trucks, to transport construction related materials, equipment and spoil; including how the use of these routes by these vehicles will be managed to mitigate congestion;
b) Information on designated staff parking areas for construction workers; and
c) How disruption to use of the road network will be minimised for emergency services, freight and other related vehicles, public transport providers, pedestrians and cyclists.
d) Measures to avoid construction traffic through the Hill Street intersection during the weekday peak periods (between 4:30 and 5:30pm)
15. The Requiring Authority shall submit the CTMP to the Council for comment. The Requiring Authority shall consider any comments received from Auckland Council when finalising the CTMP. If the Requiring Authority has not received a response from Auckland Council within 10 working days of providing the CTMP, the Requiring Authority may consider that Auckland Council has no comments.
Noise and Vibration Construction Standards
16. During construction of Stages 1 and 2, the guideline noise limits contained in New Zealand Standard 6803:1999 “The Measurement and Assessment of Noise from Construction, Maintenance and Demolition Work” shall be complied with and the principles for managing noise set out within that document shall be formally adopted. Where compliance is not practicable following the adoption of the Best Practicable Option, the process in conditions 18 and 1920 below shall apply
17. Construction vibration shall, as far as practicable, comply with the vibration limits set out the following Table A. Where the criteria set out below cannot be practically met, the process in Condition 18 shall apply.
1012
Table A – Construction Vibration Standards for people and buildings
Receiver Details Category A Category B Occupied Night-time 2000h - 0.3mm/s 1mm/s PPV PPFs* 0630h PPV Daytime 0630h - 1mm/s PPV 5mm/s PPV 2000h
Other occupied At all times 2mm/s PPV 5mm/s PPV buildings All other At all times 5mm/s PPV Tables 1 and 3 of buildings DIN4150-3:1999
* For vibration, protected premises and facilities (PPFs) are defined as dwellings, educational facilities, boarding houses, homes for the elderly and retirement villages, marae, hospitals that contain in-house patient facilities and buildings used as temporary accommodation (e.g. motels and hotels). (a) If measured or predicted vibration from construction activities exceeds the Category A standards, the Requiring Authority shall consult with the affected receivers to:
(i) Discuss the nature of the work and the anticipated days and hours when the exceedances are likely to occur; and
(ii) Determine whether the exceedances could be timed or managed to reduce the effects on the receiver.
The Requiring Authority shall maintain a record of these discussions and make them available to the Council on its request.
(b) If measured or predicted vibration from construction activities exceeds the Category B standards, the process in condition 19 shall be followed.
Type of Structure Short-term vibration Long-term vibration
PPV at the foundation PPV at PPV at at a frequency of horizontal horizontal plane
plane of of highest floor 1-10Hz 10-50Hz 50-100Hz highest (mm/s) (mm/s) (mm/s) (mm/s) floor (mm/s)
Commercial / industrial 20 20 – 40 40 - 50 40 10
Residential / school 5 5 – 15 15 – 20 15 5
Historic / sensitive structure 3 3 – 8 8 - 10 8 2.5
1013
Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP)
17. Prior to construction works commencing for each of Stages 1 and 2, the Requiring Authority shall prepare and submit for the certification of the Council, a Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP). The CNVMP and any management schedules prepared in accordance with Condition 198 (Schedules), shall be implemented throughout the construction process and may be updated where necessary with the approval of the Council.
The purpose of the CNVMP is to provide a framework for the development and implementation of the Best Practicable Option (‘BPO’) for management of all construction noise and vibration effects and to define the procedures to be followed when full compliance with the construction noise and vibration standards of Conditions 16 and 17 15 and 16 are not met following adoption of the BPO.
The CNVMP shall, as a minimum, address the information required by NZS 6803:1999, Annex E2 and in particular the following aspects with regard to managing the adverse effects of construction noise and vibration:
a) Noise and/or vibration sources, including machinery, equipment and construction techniques to be used and their scheduled durations and hours of operation including times and days when work causing construction noise and/or vibration would occur;
b) The construction noise and vibration criteria for the project;
c) Affected houses and other sensitive locations where noise and/or vibration criteria apply;
d) Predicted noise levels set out as minimum compliance distances for key activities and items of plant and identification of any dwellings or other sensitive locations where works will be required within those minimum compliance distances;
e) Mitigation and management measures, including alternative strategies where full compliance with the noise criteria from NZS 6803: 1999 condition 16 and the vibration criteria in Table A above cannot practicably be achieved, including the requirement for management schedules requiring the following content as set out in Condition 198;
f) Procedures for management of vibrations where measured or predicted vibration levels exceed the Category B limits of Table A;
g) Procedures for continuous monitoring of vibration and pre-activity building condition surveys where noncompliance with the Category B vibration limits is predicted: h) Methods and frequency for monitoring and reporting on construction noise and vibration;
i) Contact numbers for key construction staff, staff responsible for noise and/or vibration assessment and council officers; and
j) Procedures for maintaining contact with stakeholders, notifying of proposed construction activities and handling complaints about construction noise and/or vibration.
1014
Construction Noise and/or Vibration Management Schedule
19. A site-specific Construction Noise and/or Vibration Management Schedule must be prepared for any receiver or activity for which:
a) Construction vibration is either predicted or measured to exceed the Category B limits in Table A of Condition 175; or
b) Where construction noise is either predicted or measured to exceed the limits in the CNVMP, except where the exceedance of the standards is no greater than 5 decibels and must not exceed: ● 0700-2200: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive weeks in any 2 months; or
● 2200-0700: 1 period of up to 2 consecutive nights in any 10 day
The objective of the Schedule is to set out the best practicable option for minimisation of noise or vibration from the construction activity. The Schedule must set out:
a) Describe the activity (including duration), plant and machinery that is expected not to comply with the noise and/or vibration limits in the CNVMP;
b) Provide predicted levels for all receivers where the levels will not be compliant with the limits the CNVMP;
c) Describe the mitigation measures proposed to reduce the noise and/or vibration levels as far as practicable, including any options that have been discounted due to cost or any other reason;
d) Describe alternative mitigation of the impacts that is acceptable to affected parties e.g. offer of temporary accommodation during the specific activity;
e) Describe the measures adopted to ensure that building damage will not arise where non-compliance with the Category B vibration limits occurs
Urban Design and Landscape Mitigation
19. The Requiring Authority shall design and construct the Project to appropriately visually integrate the permanent works into the surrounding landscape and topography. Prior to construction works commencing for each of Stages 1 and 2, the Requiring Authority shall prepare and submit for the certification of the Council, an Urban Design and Landscape Mitigation Plan (UDLMP). in accordance with the recommendations of ‘Matakana Link Road project, Assessment of Urban Design, Landscape and Visual Effects Assessment’ Section 5.0 by Isthmus, 9th October 2017.The Requiring Authority shall complete the Project at both Stages 1 and 2 in accordance with the certified UDLMP. The purpose of the UDLMP is to provide a framework of landscape design principles and measures to ensure that the finished Project manages or mitigates potential adverse visual effects and contributes to a high quality urban environment by enhancing amenity and quality.
1015
20. The UDLMP shall contain the following information:
XX ) a framework of landscape design principles and measures to ensure that the finished Project contributes to a high quality urban environment by enhancing amenity and quality
a) The location and type of street furniture;
b) The location and type of street trees and associated verge treatment;
c) The location and type of planting associated with the corridor boundaries;
d) The location and type of any street artwork associated with the bridge crossing;
e) The boundary treatment(s) employed for the boundary with 245 Matakana Road;
i) the treatments for the boundary with 245 Matakana Road shall deliver the following outcomes: • Retaining the garden trees at 245 Matakana Road that fall adjacent to the road as far as practicable. Investigate refinements to the retaining wall alignment and construction methods to this end • Construction a good quality boundary fence/wall/hedge subject to consultation with the owners of 245 Matakana Road • Facing the retaining walls at 245 Matakana Road to provide an attractive appearance.
(xx) The treatment(s) for the boundary with the showgrounds. These shall achieve a visually open frontage (such as an open fence) between the Project and the Showgrounds. Pedestrian connections between the footpath and the Showgrounds shall be provided.
xx) The treatment(s) for the boundary with the Showgrounds and pedestrian connections shall be designed in consultation with Auckland council (Parks)
Advice Note: Shared Pathway – connection to Warkworth Showgrounds
The Puhoi to Warkworth Greenways Plan identifies proposed greenway connection routes along the MLR and connection with the existing route in the Warkworth Showgrounds. The final details of this route are still to be determined. Therefore, it is important that consideration of opportunities of futureproofing a connection to Warkworth Showgrounds are not overlooked.
a) The maintenance schedule for the three years post-planting of the landscaping and trees identified in (b) and (c) Xx In the event that an access to the Showgrounds from the Projects is agreed to be provided in discussions between AT, NZTA and the Rodney Local Board. The design of any proposed (future) access from Matakana Link Road to the Warkworth Showgrounds shall include as part of its Outline plan of Works, details of pedestrian / cycle connection
1016
2. Operational Conditions
Operational Noise Management
21. The Project shall be designed and constructed to ensure that the operational noise levels from the Project at PPFs within 200 metres of the proposed alignment as identified in Appendix G of the Marshall Day report (revised Appendix G, “Noise level predictions”, Report “Matakana Link Road – Assessment of acoustic effects” , September 2018), are predicted to be no greater than 2dB above the “Do Minimum Stage 1, Project Only” and “Do Minimum Stage 2, Project Only”, noise level columns in the revised Appendix G of the report prepared by Marshall Day Acoustics (“Matakana Link Road – Assessment of acoustic effects” , September 2018) for the relevant stage of the project. meet, as a minimum, the specified “Noise Criteria Category” in Appendix G “Do-Minimum Stage 1 or Stage 2” predicted by the acoustic modelling undertaken by Marshall Day Acoustics.
The noise criteria categories are noise levels are to be determined by noise from traffic on the Project road only, and should be modelled in accordance with the requirements of NZS6806:2010. Where other noise sources affect the received noise level, these should be excluded from the prediction measurement.
The noise limit criteria category does not need to be achieved where:
a) The residence PPF is no longer occupied or has been removed; or
b) The building no longer meets the definition of a Protected Premises and Facilities in the New Zealand Standard 6806:2010 “Acoustics – Road-traffic noise – New and altered roads”; or
c) Agreement of the landowner to exceed it has been obtained.
22. The Project shall be designed and constructed and mitigation incorporated as necessary to
ensure that the operational noise levels from the Project do not exceed 53dB LAeq(24hr) when measured at the most exposed part of any playing surface of any sports field in use as at February 2019 at the <
Advice Notes
1. The Requiring Authority is advised that archaeological provisions of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 apply to archaeological sites whether previously recorded or discovered during works.
2. The Requiring Authority is advised of the requirements of Rule E11.6.1 of the Auckland Unitary Plan for “Accidental Discovery” as they relate to both contaminated soils and heritage items.
1017 i 1018