Army's Precision Fires Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Army's Precision Fires Study Army’s Precision Fires Study Major General David P. Valcourt Chief of the Field Artillery Create the US ARMY FIELD ARTILLERY CENTER Thunder FORT SILL, OK 1 Transforming Army Indirect Fires • Robust mix of fire support systems is required to address the full spectrum of requirements and mitigate against surprise • Volume, precision, responsiveness (24/7, all weather, all terrain), and range remain critical attributes of a fire support system • Networked and precision fires offer opportunity to disrupt/destroy enemy capabilities at extended ranges and with greater precision Networked through battle command Fully interoperable with Joint systems Mobile (strategic and tactical) Fully integrated with maneuver Lethal (through precision and volume) Precise effects with area options Reduced logistics Ability to mass effects 24/7, all weather, all terrain ToTo achieve achieve Destructive, Destructive, Suppressive Suppressive and andProtectiveProtectiveeffectseffects while while minimizing minimizing Create the collateralcollateral damage damage and and taking taking advantage advantage of of emerging emerging technology technology Thunder 2 Must Deliver Precision Effects . CapabilityCapabilitytoto rapidlyrapidlyandand accuratelyaccurately locatelocate andand attackattack targetstargets withwith thethe requiredrequired operationaloperational responsivenessresponsivenessmatchedmatched toto desireddesired effectseffects(lethal(lethal andand non-lethal)non-lethal) andand thethe greatestgreatest efficiencyefficiency.. MustMust have have these these for for Precision Precision Effects: Effects: AccurateAccurate target target location location and and size size AccurateAccurate delivery delivery system system location location and and directiondirection MeteorologicalMeteorological WeaponWeapon and and ammo ammo info info AccurateAccurate computational computational procedures procedures Create the . to be Relevant and Ready Thunder 3 JFC Needs a Variety of Capabilities Shaping Fires Can’t be totally dependent on Destructive Fires at M270A1 any one service Extended Ranges ATACMS Fires to Isolate Point & Area HIMARS Capabilities that posture current Guided Rocket force for future Armed UAV Excalibur Point & Area 120mm For Precision Effects need: Paladin NLOS-C For Precision Effects need: AccurateAccurate target target location location and and size size AccurateAccurate delivery delivery system system locationlocation and and direction direction Meteorological F22 NLOS-LS Meteorological WeaponWeapon and and ammo ammo info info AccurateAccurate computational computational Close Supporting Fires EFEC procedures PGMM procedures 4 Missiles & Rockets RESPONSIVE LONG RANGE FIRES FOR THE JFC COMMANDER 9 Organic fire support directly responsive to the JFC commander 9 Optimal platforms for engagement ~ 300km 9 All weather / all environments 9 Precise & smart munitions 9 ADA threat irrelevant Highly effective in SEAD role ATACMS – QRU: Command Posts 9 High volume continuous fires 9 Direct, digital linkage with sensors 9 Rapid fires against fleeting targets 9 Effectively engage nK arty system in 3-5 minute window of vulnerability 9 Pilots not placed over targets … rockets and missiles are unmanned systems 9 Fires available to the joint force commander where and when they are needed Create the Thunder 5 MLRS Rocket Transition Basic & Extended Range Rocket Reduced Point Collateral Counterfire Targets SEAD Damage Soft Targets Structures One Round Restrictive One Hit Terrain One Kill Guided MLRS Rocket Guided Unitary Rocket Guided Cargo Rocket • Increased Target Sets • Further Reduces Logistical Foot Per Target • Precision Engagements • Maximum Range: 70-100 Km • Multi- Precision Engagements • Minimum Range: 15 Km • Overcomes Large Total System Error • Cylindrical Warhead Shape • Shoot-and-Scoot Type Targets • Elliptical Warhead Shape 350 Reduced R Collateral 300 Point Collateral O Extended Range Targets Damage C 250 Moving K 200 One Round Targets E 150 Multi Hits Basic M26 Multi Kills T 100 GMLRS IMU and Structures S GPS Aided 50 Restrictive Terrain 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 RANGE 6 What We’re Looking For -- More Precision (Reduce CEP); Better Inertial Measuring Units / GPS -- Predictable Effects and Controllable Effects -- Scaleable Multiple Effects (Wrapped Penetrators) -- Semi-autonomous / Autonomous Operations -- Greater System Reliability -- Increased Reach (Range) -- Loiter Ability (Maneuverable) -- Waypoint Flight -- Automatic Target Recognition (Detect, Classify, Recognize, Identify) -- In-Flight Communications (Update, Re-tasking, etc.) -- Multiple Sensor Package (Uncooled IR, IR, Millimeter Wave, LADAR, TV, Semi-active Laser) -- Greater Sensor Footprint -- Reduced Size / Weight -- Reduced Cost -- Warheads with Controllable Separating Motors 7 ExcaliburExcalibur PrecisionPrecision BusBus Unitary Excalibur Family Variants GPS Receiver Inertial Measurement Unit – IMU Height of Burst, Point Canard Actuation Sys - CAS Detonating & Delay Sensors Block I (Unitary): Block II (Smart): Fuze Safe & Arm Unitary (HE) warhead Detect/acquire/engage Fin stabilized airframe submunition capability Unitary Penetrating GPS SAASM Precision guidance Payload GPS Antennas System Battery Base Bleed Airframe Block III (Discriminating): Future Blocks: Discriminating capability Unlimited potential (e.g. Target Recognition) Capabilities Future Potential • Precision bus capable of delivering a variety of • Future potential is unlimited warheads • Serves as a bus to carry any payload that must • Expands fire support capability to support be delivered at extended ranges with increased various missions precision • Extended Range 35-40km • Future applications could include: home-on-jam, • 10m Circular Error Probable (CEP) at all ranges delivery of sensors, precision scatterable mines • Decreased collateral damage • Other non-lethal applications • Increased tactical efficiency Create the Thunder 8 Changing Role of the Cannon Current Force Future Force x x UA I I I I Close Support: Attack of enemy troops, NLOS weapons, or positions in close combat, enabling maneuver forces as part of decisive operations with the following categories of fires: • Destructive • Suppressive • Protective Close Support • Special Purpose Close Support Shaping Counterfire Shaping Counterstrike Tomorrow – NLOS-C emphasis on Today - Direct Support cannons close support while other fires must do it all – often resulting in assets (PAM, MRM, GMLRS & Joint less responsive and effective fires fires) help with shaping and counterstrike 9 Modular Designs Fires Battalion – Infantry BCT Fires Battalion – Heavy BCT I I I I 406 457 I I I HHB 118 184 FSC 104 I I I (2X92) HHB 139 222 FSC 97 (2X111) Target Acquisition 18 MI 22 Target Acquisition 30 MI 22 CapabilityCapability for: for: •Locating•Locating and and assessing assessing targets targets with with organic organic TUAVs TUAVs and and radars radars •Providing•Providing MET MET for for all all BCT BCT indirect indirect fire fire assets assets •Conducting•Conducting internal internal BCT BCT counterfire counterfire operations operations •Conducting•Conducting sustainment sustainment with with organic organic assets assets •Supporting•Supporting airborne airborne and and air air assault assault operations operations (Infantry (Infantry only) only) •Providing•Providing platoon platoon fire fire units units Fires Brigade X Organic Assigned II II I I I I SPT SIGNAL TAB HHB Rocket/Missile ATK I O Cannon Enablers Task Org based on: JSCP,TRO, Stationing and / or Specific Operations CapabilityCapability for: for: ••ProvidingProviding close close support support and and precision precision strike strike for for JFC, JFC, UE UE and and brigades brigades with with cannons, cannons, rockets,rockets, missiles missiles and and armed armed UAVs UAVs without without augmentation augmentation ••EmployingEmploying combinations combinations of of organic organic and and assigned assigned enablers enablers ••ConductingConducting sustainment sustainment and and signal signal operations operations with with organic organic assets assets Create the ••LocatingLocating and and assessing assessing targets targets with with organic organic TUAVs TUAVs and and radars radars ••ProvidingProviding MET MET and and survey survey for for all all Fires Fires BDE BDE indirect indirect fire fire assets assets and and radars radars Thunder 10 NLOS-Cannon Caliber Decision Create the Thunder 1111 Cannon Mission Module Priorities 9 Range of at least 30KM for HE 9 Accuracy must not exceed 0.55% of range at low angle, for ranges of 30 km or less (165m CEP) 9 Rate of fire of at least 6 RPM 9 Respond to a fire order in 30 seconds when moving 9 Automatic loading (no personnel) 9 Rearm the system in under 12 minutes 9 On-board ammunition of at least 24 rounds 9 Survivability through crew served weapon and active protection Create the Thunder 12 Range vs Weight Savings 36 km - M2005 VLAP*** 40 km Excalibur M2005 VLAP*** 35 km 32 km Excalibur 30 km M2 P 00 31 km M2005 VLAP*** RA 0** 49 * M913 RAP Excalibur* 26 km M5 28 km – M864 M549 RAP M795 PIP** BBDPICM M2020 PFF*** 22 km 23 km – M864 22 km M795 HE, M825 SMK M549 RAP M795 PIP** BBDPICM 18 km 20 km 17 km – M864 18 km M107HE, M483DP M107HE, M483DP M1 HE 14 km M795, M825 FASCAM M107HE, M483DP FASCAM M795, M825 FASCAM 6 km 155mm, 37 Caliber, 155mm, 38 Caliber, 155mm, 39 Caliber, Zone 5 105mm – 62 Caliber Zone 3 Zone 4 FCS AoA Base Case 1596 lb savings 1949 lb savings 1367 lb savings BBDPICM: Base Bleed Dual Purpose Improved Conventional Munition
Recommended publications
  • Project Manager Combat Ammunition Systems Product Manager Excalibur Product Manager Guided Precision Munitions and Mortar System
    AMMUNITION tem (GPS) precision-guidance technology mortar cartridge with 10 meters CEP accu - with an inertial measurement unit to pro - racy to rapidly defeat personnel targets The Program Executive Office for Am - vide accurate, first-round fire-for-effect ca - while minimizing collateral damage. APMI munition (PEO Ammunition) has the mis - pability in an urban setting with accuracy is compatible with U.S. dismounted 120 mm sion to continue being the best provider of better than 4 meters circular error probable weapons and fire-control system, and the conventional, leap-ahead munitions, mor - (CEP). Excalibur is approximately 1 meter Stryker double-V hull mortar carrier and tars, towed artillery systems and counter- in length and weighs 106 pounds. Its ex - fire-control system. It has been successfully improvised explosive device (IED) prod - tended range (up to 40 kilometers) and used in operations in OEF. ucts by fostering innovation and diversity high accuracy result in increased lethality The PGK is a GPS guidance kit with prox- for the warfighter. Project managers within with a decrease in required volume of fire imity and point detonating fuzing func - the PEO are Combat Ammunition Systems, per engagement. Excalibur Increment Ia is tions. It is compatible with existing high-ex - Maneuver Ammunition Systems, Joint Pro - currently completing the last of its full-rate plosive, 155 mm M549A1 and M795 cannon gram Manager Towed Artillery Systems, production, and Excalibur Increment Ib has artillery projectiles. The PGK corrects the Close Combat Systems, Project Director initiated low-rate initial production. ballistic trajectory of the projectile to reduce Joint Services and Project Director Joint delivery errors and improves projectile ac - Products.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Caliber Projectile Fill Adherence
    Supporting Munitions Safety Large Caliber Projectile Fill Adherence IMEMTS 2019 Dr. Ernie Baker Warheads Technology TSO [email protected] Explosive Loading Supporting Munitions Safety • Projectiles are filled using three primary methods: pressed, melt pour or cast cure. • Pressed non-adhered fill: M982 Excalibur 155mm - Thick liner (appears to be several mm) with PBXN-9 billet - Not really what we would consider “non-adhered” Excalibur program reportedly decided not to use PBXW-114 as it “seriously failed a setback safety test and was discarded from further consideration”. PBXN-9 was therefore chosen over PBXW-114 and PBXN-112 [Rhinesmith 2003]. Explosive Loading Supporting Munitions Safety • Melt Pour: Typically meant to adhere to the projectile case - But it doesn’t always adhere: bituminous or varnish interior coatings • Some UK melt pour fillings are meant to adhere. • Other UK melt pour fillings are meant not to adhere • Working group to discuss and investigate Base gaps from melt pour explosive fillings x-ray inspection (images provided by ARDEC). Cast Cure Non-Adhered Fillings Supporting Munitions Safety • Cast Cure: Significant number of purposely non-adhered fillings - BAE Systems Land UK loaded 105mm developmental L50: ROWANEX 1100 explosive Was filled using a “flexible shell liner” [Morris 2005] - Eurenco (SME Explosive & Propellants Group SNPE at that time) sometimes fill with a thin liner with cast cure explosive in order to prevent explosive adherence to the case [Freche 2003, Freche 2006] • Noted that it is patented
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 5 AADH05 OFC+Spine.Indd 1 the Mortar Company
    ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE ARTILLERY ISSUE 5 HANDBOOK HANDBOOK – ISSUE 5 PUBLISHED MARCH 2018 THE CONCISE GLOBAL INDUSTRY GUIDE ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE AADH05_OFC+spine.indd 1 3/16/2018 10:18:59 AM The Mortar Company. CONFRAG® CONTROLS – THE NEW HIGH EXPLOSIVE STANDARD HDS has developed CONFRAG® technology to increase the lethal performance of the stan- dard High Explosive granade for 60 mm CDO, 60 mm, 81 mm and 120 mm dramatically. The HE lethality is increased by controlling fragmentation mass and quantity, fragment velocity and fragment distribution, all controlled by CONFRAG® technology. hds.hirtenberger.com AADH05_IFC_Hirtenberger.indd 2 3/16/2018 9:58:03 AM CONTENTS Editor 3 Introduction Tony Skinner. [email protected] Grant Turnbull, Editor of Land Warfare International magazine, welcomes readers to Reference Editors Issue 5 of Shephard Media’s Artillery and Air Defence Handbook. Ben Brook. [email protected] 4 Self-propelled howitzers Karima Thibou. [email protected] A guide to self-propelled artillery systems that are under development, in production or being substantially modernised. Commercial Manager Peter Rawlins [email protected] 29 Towed howitzers Details of towed artillery systems that are under development, in production or Production and Circulation Manager David Hurst. being substantially modernised. [email protected] 42 Self-propelled mortars Production Elaine Effard, Georgina Kerridge Specifications for self-propelled mortar systems that are under development, in Georgina Smith, Adam Wakeling. production or being substantially modernised. Chairman Nick Prest 53 Towed mortars Descriptions of towed heavy mortar systems that are under development, in CEO Darren Lake production or being substantially modernised.
    [Show full text]
  • EXCALIBUR As of December 31, 2010
    Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-366 EXCALIBUR As of December 31, 2010 Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED EXCALIBUR December 31, 2010 SAR Table of Contents Program Information 3 Responsible Office 3 References 3 Mission and Description 4 Executive Summary 5 Threshold Breaches 7 Schedule 8 Performance 10 Track To Budget 11 Cost and Funding 12 Low Rate Initial Production 21 Nuclear Cost 22 Foreign Military Sales 22 Unit Cost 23 Cost Variance 26 Contracts 29 Deliveries and Expenditures 32 Operating and Support Cost 33 UNCLASSIFIED 2 EXCALIBUR December 31, 2010 SAR Program Information Designation And Nomenclature (Popular Name) M982 155mm Precision Guided Extended Range Artillery Projectile (Excalibur) DoD Component Army Responsible Office Responsible Office LTC Michael Milner Phone 973-724-3152 SFAE-AMO-CAS-EX Fax 973-724-8786 Bldg 172 DSN Phone 880-3152 Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000 DSN Fax 880-8786 [email protected] Date Assigned June 1, 2009 References SAR Baseline (Production Estimate) Army Acquisition Executive (AAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated July 27, 2007 Approved APB AAE Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 14, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED 3 EXCALIBUR December 31, 2010 SAR Mission and Description Excalibur provides improved fire support through a Precision Guided Extended Range family of munitions with greatly increased accuracy and offers significant reduction in collateral damage. The Excalibur is interoperable with the M777A2 Lightweight 155mm howitzer (LW155), and the M109A6 (Paladin) howitzer. Excalibur will increase range over current Rocket Assisted Projectiles (from 30 kilometers (km) to 37.5 km), with a 10 meter accuracy (Circular Error Probable) at all ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Tykistön Ja Kranaatinheittimistön 2010-Luvun Ampumatarvikkeet Ja Niiden Mahdollisuudet Tulenkäytön Kehittämiselle
    TYKISTÖN JA KRANAATINHEITTIMISTÖN 2010-LUVUN AMPUMATARVIKKEET JA NIIDEN MAHDOLLISUUDET TULENKÄYTÖN KEHITTÄMISELLE ILKKA IKONEN Kirjaoittaja on kapteeni ja DI ja opiskelee yleisesiupseerikurssilla ABSTRACT In this article we look briefly at the evolution with a large variety of fuzes. In the beginning and revolution of munitions development the fuzes were mainly percussions fuzes even between 20th and 21st centuries by though some of them had delay action. The introducing state of the art munitions for next evolutional step was the use of airburst guns and mortars. More interesting part fuzes. The technology behind airbursts of article demonstrates, with the help traces back to powder train. Clockwork of simulations, how new munitions can mechanisms appeared at the beginning of change the way how we use fire support the 20th Century and electronic time fuzes tactics and techniques. With the help of appeared in the 1980s. The latest evolution the simulation article merges technical of airburst fuzes has been radar fuze which progress and tactics and also attempts to came into service mainly in the 1990s. The close gap between the technical and tactical state of the art fuzes in the 2010s are thinking models. Too often soldiers are course correcting fuzes (CCF), which fit afraid of the technical and maybe the more standard HE projectiles. theory based world and at the same time All in all, the development of fuzes has the technical experts are afraid of taking been mainly evolutional. However, the 1980s steps to the practical world where the revolutionized the artillery and mortar soldiers mostly operate. From history we ammunition development.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPENDIUM of PROBLEM DEFINITION STATEMENTS - VOLUME III (2018) I Serial Topics Problem Pages No Statement No
    COMPENDIUM OF PROBLEM DEFINITION COMPENDIUMSTATEMENTS OF - VOLUMEPROBLEM DEFINITIONIII (2018) COMPENDIUMSTATEMENTS OF - PROBLEMVOLUME III DEFINITION (2018) STATEMENTS - VOLUME III (2018) MESSAGE Modernisation and capability development through indigenous technology is an imperative for a nation’s Army to meet its strategic expectations. This calls for a vibrant and responsive defence sector to keep pace with the needs of the Army. The setting up of the Army Design Bureau has provided an institutionalized interface between the Army, Industry and Academia to share each other’s requirements, capabilities and concerns. It will strengthen the efforts of the Army and Industry to achieve self-reliance in defence manufacturing, in sync with the ‘Make in India’ initiative. The compilation of the third volume of ‘Problem Statements’ by the Indian Army is a commendable effort to share its requirements with the academia and the defence industrial base for creating indigenous solutions. It will facilitate a comprehensive insight into the challenges faced by the Army and the opportunities it offers to the Academia and Industry. Confederation of Indian Industry is committed to supporting the “Make in India” program and welcomes this initiative. I would also like to compliment the Society of Indian Defence Manufacturers, for this first public endeavour since its formation, in partnership with the Indian Army. Chandrajit Banerjee Director General, CII MESSAGE To march towards self-reliance in defence manufacturing and align with the ‘Make in India’ initiative of the Prime Minister of India, the Indian army has taken great strides in all strata of inclusive Capability development in the Country. It has exemplified its faith by launching the maximum number of ‘Make’ projects in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems
    Dec Worldwide Equipment Guide 2016 Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems TRADOC G-2 ACE–Threats Integration Ft. Leavenworth, KS Distribution Statement: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Opposing Force: Worldwide Equipment Guide Chapters Volume 2 Volume 2 Air and Air Defense Systems Volume 2 Signature Letter Volume 2 TOC and Introduction Volume 2 Tier Tables – Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, UAVs, Air Defense Chapter 1 Fixed Wing Aviation Chapter 2 Rotary Wing Aviation Chapter 3 UAVs Chapter 4 Aviation Countermeasures, Upgrades, Emerging Technology Chapter 5 Unconventional and SPF Arial Systems Chapter 6 Theatre Missiles Chapter 7 Air Defense Systems 2 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Units of Measure The following example symbols and abbreviations are used in this guide. Unit of Measure Parameter (°) degrees (of slope/gradient, elevation, traverse, etc.) GHz gigahertz—frequency (GHz = 1 billion hertz) hp horsepower (kWx1.341 = hp) Hz hertz—unit of frequency kg kilogram(s) (2.2 lb.) kg/cm2 kg per square centimeter—pressure km kilometer(s) km/h km per hour kt knot—speed. 1 kt = 1 nautical mile (nm) per hr. kW kilowatt(s) (1 kW = 1,000 watts) liters liters—liquid measurement (1 gal. = 3.785 liters) m meter(s)—if over 1 meter use meters; if under use mm m3 cubic meter(s) m3/hr cubic meters per hour—earth moving capacity m/hr meters per hour—operating speed (earth moving) MHz megahertz—frequency (MHz = 1 million hertz) mach mach + (factor) —aircraft velocity (average 1062 km/h) mil milliradian, radial measure (360° = 6400 mils, 6000 Russian) min minute(s) mm millimeter(s) m/s meters per second—velocity mt metric ton(s) (mt = 1,000 kg) nm nautical mile = 6076 ft (1.152 miles or 1.86 km) rd/min rounds per minute—rate of fire RHAe rolled homogeneous armor (equivalent) shp shaft horsepower—helicopter engines (kWx1.341 = shp) µm micron/micrometer—wavelength for lasers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond
    Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond John Gordon IV, Igor Mikolic-Torreira, D. Sean Barnett, Katharina Ley Best, Scott Boston, Dan Madden, Danielle C. Tarraf, Jordan Willcox C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2124 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9967-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Army photo by Spc. Josselyn Fuentes. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Army Fires for Army 2025, sponsored by the Field Artil- lery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma (a part of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • On Guidance and Control for Guided Artillery Projectiles, Part 1: General Considerations
    On Guidance and Control for Guided Artillery Projectiles, Part 1: General Considerations JOHN W.C. ROBINSON, FREDRIK BEREFELT FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, is a mainly assignment-funded agency under the Ministry of Defence. The core activities are research, method and technology development, as well as studies conducted in the interests of Swedish defence and the safety and security of society. The organisation employs approximately 1000 per- sonnel of whom about 800 are scientists. This makes FOI Sweden’s largest research institute. FOI gives its customers access to leading-edge expertise in a large number of fi elds such as security policy studies, defence and security related analyses, the assessment of various types of threat, systems for control and management of crises, protection against and management of hazardous substances, IT security and the potential offered by new sensors. FOI Defence Research Agency Phone: +46 8 555 030 00 www.foi.se Defence & Security, Systems and Technology Fax: +46 8 555 031 00 FOI-R--3291--SE Technical report Defence & Security,Systems and Technology SE-164 90 Stockholm ISSN 1650-1942 October 2011 John W.C. Robinson, Fredrik Berefelt On Guidance and Control for Guided Artillery Projectiles, Part 1: General Considerations Titel Om Styrning av Artilleriprojektiler, Del 1: Generella Overv¨ aganden¨ Title On Guidance and Control for Guided Artillery Pro- jectiles, Part 1: General Considerations Rapportnummer / Report no FOI-R--3291--SE Rapporttyp / Report type Technical report / Teknisk rapport Manad˚ / Month October Utgivningsar˚ / Year 2011 Antal sidor / Pages 29 ISSN ISSN-1650-1942 Kund / Customer Swedish Armed Forces Projektnummer / Project no E20675 Godkand¨ av / Approved by Maria Sjoblom¨ Head, Aeronautics and Systems Integration FOI Swedish Defence Research Agency Defence & Security, Systems and Technology SE-164 90 STOCKHOLM 2 FOI-R--3291--SE Abstract The problem of adding guidance, navigation and control capabiltities to spin- ning artillery projectiles is discussed from a fairly general perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernisation of Surveillance and Precision Weapon Systems For
    No. 254 October 2020 Major General (Dr.) PK Modernisation of Chakravorty, VSM (Retd), is a Senior Fellow (Veteran) at the Surveillance and Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS). Precision Weapon Systems for Infantry in the Indian Army Operational Necessity Key Points The Infantry is a predominant arm which operates The capability, in the Defence 14th in multifarious terrain and weather conditions. In Five Year Plan, which starts from 2023, , must ensure that every soldier the current milieu, it needs the capability to face a of the Infantry has a Battle Field two-front war against both China and Pakistan. Management System which would provide a Common Operating Picture, Currently, there are capability gaps which exist in enabling quick response and the field of Surveillance and Precision Weapon destruction of the target. The surveillance equipment needed systems. This would be the method for fighting by the Infantry Battalion includes the New Generation Wars, which would be dealing Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with greater levels of technology and which would (UAV), Battle Field Surveillance Radars and state of the art Thermal gradually encompass Artificial Intelligence and Devices. Quantum Computing. The capability, in the In this era of warfare, night fighting capabilities are extremely important Defence 14 th Five Year Plan, which starts from and most of the infantry battalions 2023, must ensure that every soldier of the Infantry prefer HHTI for the combatant has a Battle Field Management System which soldiers. The Indian Infantry needs modern would provide a Common Operating Picture, weapons for effective functioning in enabling quick response and destruction of the the current battle space.
    [Show full text]
  • Fires Bulletin November-December 2011
    January - February 2012 A Joint Publication for U.S. Artillery Professionals sill-www.army.mil/firesbulletin/ www.facebook.com/firesbulletin Adapting young leaders through learning, training concepts, the Profession of Arms Campaign Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. • Headquarters, Department of the Army • PB644-12-1 CONTENTS JANUARY-FEBRUARY Success through Soldiers, leaders 4 By MG David D. Halverson Adaptable, flexible, agile air defense professionals 6 By COL Daniel Karbler Distinguishing the unique profession of field artillerymen 8 By COL Mike Cabrey 10 US Army Air Defense and Field Artillery Award Winners 10 Fires change of command ceremonies An interview with COL Dan Pinnell, US Army Field Artillery 11 2nd BCT, 1st AD brigade combat team commander By Shirley Dismuke Employment of the M982 in Afghanistan: US Army and Marine Corps differences 16 by MG (RET) Toney Stricklin Meeting the fire support challenge 20 By COL Gene Meredith and COL Richard M. Cabrey Things you must get right as a battalion commander 24 By COL Steve Maranian 27 Fires Author’s Guide A chief warrant officer’s advice about promotion boards 28 By CW5 Manuel Vasquez DISCLAIMER: F i r e s , a professional bulletin, is PURPOSE: Founded in 2007, Fires serves as a forum for the professional discussions of all published bimonthly by Headquarters, Department Fires professionals, both active and Reserve Component (RC); disseminates professional of the Army under the auspices of the Fires Center of Excellence (Building 652, Hamilton knowledge about progress, developments and best use in campaigns; cultivates a common Road), Fort Sill, Okla. The views expressed are those of the authors and not the Department understanding of the power, limitations and application of joint Fires, both lethal and of Defense or its elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Weapon Systems: Technical, Military, Legal and Humanitarian Aspects
    EXPERT MEETING AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS TECHNICAL, MILITARY, LEGAL AND HUMANITARIAN ASPECTS GENEVA, SWITZERLAND 26 TO 28 MARCH 2014 International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland T +41 22 734 60 01 F +41 22 733 20 57 E-mail: [email protected] www.icrc.org © ICRC, November 2014 AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS: TECHNICAL, MILITARY, LEGAL AND HUMANITARIAN ASPECTS EXPERT MEETING GENEVA, SWITZERLAND 26 to 28 MARCH 2014 Autonomous weapon systems: Technical, military, legal and humanitarian aspects. 2 Expert meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, 26-28 March 2014. CONTENTS Introduction and structure of the report 5 Part I: Summary report by the International Committee of the Red Cross 7 Meeting highlights 7 Background 11 Summary of presentations and discussions 12 Part II: Selected presentations 25 Civilian robotics and developments in autonomous systems 25 – Ludovic Righetti Autonomous weapons and human supervisory control 29 – Noel Sharkey Ethical restraint of lethal autonomous robotic systems: Requirements, 33 research, and implications – Ronald Arkin Research and development of autonomous ‘decision-making’ systems 39 – Darren Ansell Can autonomous weapon systems respect the principles of distinction, 41 proportionality and precaution? – Marco Sassòli Increasingly autonomous weapon systems: Accountability and responsibility 45 – Christof Heyns Ethical issues raised by autonomous weapon systems 49 – Peter Asaro Autonomous weapon systems and ethics 53 – Peter Lee Part III: Background paper by the International Committee of the Red Cross 57 Executive summary 57 Introduction 59 Part A: Autonomy in weapon systems 59 Part B: Applying international humanitarian law 74 Part C: Ethical and societal concerns, and the dictates of public conscience 91 Annex 1: Expert meeting agenda 95 Annex 2: List of participants 99 Autonomous weapon systems: Technical, military, legal and humanitarian aspects.
    [Show full text]