DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on Access to Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THEMATIC REPORT IMPACT OF THE CONFLICT ON EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AND CHILDREN’S ACCESS TO EDUCATION IN EASTERN UKRAINE January 2015 — March 2020 July 2020 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5 SMM monitoring activities of educational facilities 6 Impact of shelling and small-arms fire on educational facilities from 2015 to 2019 8 Civilian casualties in and around educational facilities due to ceasefire violations 9 Damage to educational facilities 10 Repairs to damaged facilities 11 Recommitments to the ceasefire at the start of the school year 12 Dangers posed by mines and other explosive devices 14 Educational facilities close to military or military-type positions and hardware (less than 1km) 15 Hardship faced by children and school staff 17 Civilian freedom of movement and access to educational facilities 18 Schools in government-controlled Marinka and non-government-controlled 19 Dokuchaievsk Impediments to the SMM’s access to educational facilities 21 Conclusion 22 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Since the beginning of 2015, the OSCE Between January 2015 and March 2020, Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM) the Mission has confirmed damage to 93 has been monitoring and reporting on the educational facilities in 43 settlements on both impact of the conflict on educational facilities sides of the contact line in Donetsk and and children’s access to education in the Luhansk regions. In some instances, children conflict-affected areas of Donetsk and were inside the educational facilities when Luhansk regions of Ukraine as part of its the incidents occurred. With many educational mandate to gather information and report on facilities rendered non-operational due to the the security situation and monitor and support conflict, many children have to rely on distance the respect for human rights. learning programmes offered by other educational facilities and, at times, have to In this regard, the SMM’s monitoring since cross the contact line to sit exams or meet with 2015 includes observations of damage to instructors. In some instances, children cross educational facilities due to shelling and small- the contact line every day to attend classes. arms fire, the usage of such facilities by the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the armed The SMM remains committed to monitoring formations and their presence within 1km of and reporting on the impact of conflict on educational facilities, as well as the impact of educational facilities and children’s access the conflict on children and school staff. For to education; however, it continues to face children living near the contact line, access to impediments in gathering information, education continues to be hampered by particularly in non-government-controlled security risks posed by shelling, the areas. prevalence of mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO) near schools or on their commute to Measures should be taken by the sides to school, as well as school buildings that have enable the continuity of education in a safe been rendered structurally unsafe by shelling environment and to ensure the civilian nature and small arms fire. of educational facilities is preserved, including by intensifying efforts aimed at adhering to Ongoing ceasefire violations along the contact commitments to cease fire; regular mine action line continue to pose a threat to the physical and awareness raising for students and school and psychological well-being of children and staff, and refraining from establishing military educators. The Mission corroborated nine and military-type positions in and within the civilian casualties (seven children and two vicinity of educational facilities. adults) of which four were due to shelling in the immediate vicinity of educational facilities and five civilian casualties were due to UXO or unspent ammunition at educational facilities. The lives of children and school staff (most of whom are women) continue to be put at risk due to the presence of positions and equipment less than 1km from educational facilities, as well as the use of educational facilities by the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the armed formations. 4 INTRODUCTION The SMM is mandated, among other tasks, to The SMM has been monitoring the ability of report on the security situation and monitor children on both sides of the contact line in and support respect for human rights and Donetsk and Luhansk regions to attend fundamental freedoms. This includes classes and enjoy a safe and secure school monitoring and reporting on the impact of the environment since 2015. In the report, the conflict on the ability of children to access their SMM presents its observations related to rights, such as their right to an education. For damage to educational buildings due to children living near the contact line, access to shelling and gunfire; dangers posed by mines education continues to be hampered by and UXO; educational facilities used by the security risks posed by shelling, the Ukrainian Armed Forces or the armed prevalence of mines and UXO near schools or formations or where positions and equipment on their commute to school, as well as school are close to educational facilities; hardships buildings that have been rendered structurally faced by children and educational staff; and unsafe by shelling and gunfire. According to impediments to the SMM’s access to the United Nations’ Ukraine Education Cluster, information on educational facilities. The there are over 670,000 schoolchildren across report covers the SMM’s observations from 1,727 schools in government-controlled areas 1 January 2015 until 31 March 2020. and 1,815 in non-government-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions in need of education-related assistance.1 1 United Nations Ukraine Education Cluster, Education Cluster Strategy: Ukraine 2019-2020, October 2019. (https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/sites/www.humanitarianresponse.info/files/documents/files/uec_strategy_final_eng.pdf) 5 SMM MONITORING ACTIVITIES OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Since 2015, the SMM has been monitoring the educational facilities on both side of the security situation around schools and contact line were closed due the COVID-19 educational facilities in Donetsk and Luhansk pandemic. The SMM will resume its follow-up regions, particularly those close to the contact on access to education once facilities are line. In 2015, the SMM’s monitoring was operating and classes have resumed.2 focused on damage to educational facilities due to shelling and small-arms fire. Since 2016, the Mission has progressively widened Figure 1. Educational facilities the scope of its monitoring to include other visited by the SMM 2016 to 2019 issues affecting educational facilities, such as the usage of the educational facilities by 143 Ukrainian Armed Forces and by the armed 112 formations and their presence within 1km of 90 72 73 educational facilities, as well as the impact of 54 61 44 the conflict on children and school staff. In this period, the SMM conducted 649 visits, including follow-up visits to educational 2016 2017 2018 2019 facilities. Three hundred of these visits were in government-controlled areas and 349 in non- Government- Non-government- controlled areas controlled areas government-controlled areas. Forty-one percent of the visits were in Luhansk region and 59 per cent were in Donetsk region. In 2016, the SMM focused on assessing damage caused by shelling and small-arms fire and the Figure 2. Operational status of use of these facilities by military or military- educational facilities visited, type personnel (see figures 1 and 2 for 2016 to 2019 breakdown of facilities visited); in 2017, the Mission included the challenges faced by 213 educators and children, such as the security challenges and reports of the psychological 122 impact of the conflict; in 2018 and 2019, the 109 96 SMM further widened the geographical scope of its monitoring to include schools within 41 42 15km of the contact line. In the first three 17 9 months of 2020, the SMM has been following 2016 2017 2018 2019 up on reports of damage to educational facilities. By the middle of March 2020, Operational Not operational 2 In government-controlled areas, educational facilities were closed as of 12 March. In non-government-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, schools and universities have been operating in ‘distance learning mode’ since 19 March and 30 March respectively. Kindergartens were allowed to remain open in non-government-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, though some kindergarten decided to close. 6 7 IMPACT OF SHELLING AND SMALL -ARMS FIRE ON EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES FROM 2015 TO MARCH 2020 Between 2015 and March 2020, the SMM recorded around 300,000 ceasefire recorded nearly 1.5 million ceasefire violations, of which around 10,000 were violations. The SMM started recording within 1km of the schools monitored. In geolocation data for ceasefire violations as of 2020, the SMM recorded around 60,000 14 May 2018. Between 14 May and 31 ceasefire violations of which 2,500 were December 2018, the SMM recorded over within 1km of schools monitored by the SMM 312,000 ceasefire violations in Donetsk and over 2019. This has resulted in civilian Luhansk regions, of which at least 4,600 casualties and damage to educational occurred within 1km of the educational facilities on both sides of the contact line in facilities monitored. In 2019, the Mission Donetsk and Luhansk regions. 8 Civilian casualties in and around educational facilities due to ceasefire violations Since 2015, the SMM has recorded nine On 17 May 2018, the father of a student (43- civilian casualties (six boys, one girl, one man year-old man) was injured near school no.
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018

    Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018

    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
  • Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 777-Th FSC Plenary Meeting (28 January 2015 at 10.00, Hofburg)

    Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 777-Th FSC Plenary Meeting (28 January 2015 at 10.00, Hofburg)

    FSC.DEL/11/15 28 January 2015 ENGLISH only Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 777-th FSC Plenary Meeting (28 January 2015 at 10.00, Hofburg) Mr. Chairman, The Russian aggression against Ukraine, which resulted in illegal occupation and annexation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, as well as escalation in Ukraine’s east, continues and produces a sharply growing number of casualties among civilians and servicemen in Ukraine. On 24 January, Russian‐backed terrorists committed another heinous crime. The deliberate shelling by Grad missiles of the residential areas of the city of Mariupol, followed a number of earlier terrorist attacks, among them the shellings of the civilian bus near Volnovakha, of the trolleybus stop in Donetsk, of residential areas in many towns and villages. The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission’s assessment concluded that the attack had been carried out through the use of Grad and Uragan rockets fired from areas controlled by the “Donetsk People’s Republic”. On January 25, the Ukrainian government reported that the toll from the attack had reached 30 dead and 102 wounded. The Ukrainian Security Service collected evidence, including telephone intercepts and the account of the accomplice of this murderous act, that the artillery attack on peaceful Mariupol was committed by the Russian artillery battery commanded by a Russian officer with a call sign "Pepel". Mr. Chairman, Distinguished colleagues, The cold‐blooded murder of 30 civilians and wounding of more than a hundred people by pro‐Russian terrorists in Mariupol is a crime against humanity. The Ukrainian authorities will do all in their power to make sure that the perpetrators of this heinous crime are brought to justice.
  • Ukraine Humanitarian Situation Report # 28

    Ukraine Humanitarian Situation Report # 28

    Ukraine Humanitarian Situation Report # 28 SITUATION IN NUMBERS Highlights 20 February 2015 Recent insecurity triggered additional movement 134,290 of people with 1,042,066 people now internally # of registered internally displaced children displaced in Ukraine, of whom 134,290 are (Ministry of Social Policy, 16 February 2015) children (Source: Ministry of Social Policy). 1,042,066 # of registered internally displaced people A ceasefire agreement was reached in Minsk on (Ministry of Social Policy, 16 February 2015) 12 February to halt the spike of violence that flared up in eastern Ukraine over the past few 5 million weeks, causing multiple civilian casualties, # of affected people including children. (OCHA, Humanitarian Needs Overview, February 2015) The Strategic Response Plan (SRP) for Ukraine is 1.7 million currently being revised by the Humanitarian approx. # of affected children Country Team (HCT), following the deterioration (UNICEF Humanitarian Action for Children 2015) of the humanitarian situation in the country. 3.2 million On 19 February, the UNICEF, UNHCR and WHO # of people targeted for humanitarian aid (OCHA, Strategic Response Plan, February 2015) organized humanitarian convoy reached Donetsk city providing life-saving supplies to an estimated 13,000 people in dire needs including 5,000 63 children children. # of child casualties since March 2014 (WHO, 19 February 2015) As of 16 February, the Ministry of Education and 169 children Science (MoES) reported that the number of IDP # of children wounded since March 2014 children registered in schools and kindergartens (WHO, 19 February 2015) is increasing in Donetsk, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk and Kyiv regions. UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT 20 FEBRUARY 2015 Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs A ceasefire agreement was reached in Minsk on 12 February to halt the spike of violence that flared up in eastern Ukraine over the past few weeks, causing multiple civilian casualties, including children.
  • Daily Report 185/2021 10 August 20211

    Daily Report 185/2021 10 August 20211

    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 185/2021 10 August 20211 Summary In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded 28 ceasefire violations, including one explosion. In the previous 24 hours, it recorded 116 ceasefire violations in the region. In Luhansk region, the Mission recorded no ceasefire violations. In the previous 24 hours, it recorded 75 ceasefire violations. The SMM followed up on reports of a man injured due to shelling in government-controlled Krasnohorivka, Donetsk region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. It recorded ceasefire violations inside the disengagement area near Petrivske. The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to a localized ceasefire to enable the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. The Mission continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at four entry-exit checkpoints and three corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM visited a border crossing point outside government control and monitored areas near the border with the Russian Federation in Donetsk region. The SMM monitored a gathering in Kyiv. The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at three checkpoints of the armed formations in southern Donetsk. Its unmanned aerial vehicles again experienced instances of GPS signal interference.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 August 2021. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons.
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future

    Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future

    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
  • A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine

    A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine

    ` A Rapid WASH and Infrastructure Assessment in Non-Government Controlled Areas of Eastern Ukraine August, 2015 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This assessment was commissioned by UNICEF, with data collected remotely by REACH in July 2015 from key informants at water, health, and education facilities as well as from affected communities. Thanks go to all those individuals and organisations who contributed towards this assessment, including the Global WASH Cluster who contributed to the final analysis and drafting. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT, its sister organisation ACTED, and the United Nations Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNOSAT). REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions. For more information, write to [email protected], visit www.reach-intiative.org and follow us @REACH_info. Cover photo: Delivery of drinking water to Debaltseve, Donetsk Oblast, March 2015, ©UNICEF i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conflict has been ongoing in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts since May 2014, with spikes of violence in June 2014 and again in January-February and in July 2015. Attempts to negotiate a political solution to the conflict led to the ‘Minsk’ ceasefire signed between the Governments of Ukraine, Russian Federation and the non-state actors in September 2014. However, the truce collapsed within days, similar to a new ceasefire agreement signed in February 2015. Relative calm around the Contact Line (CL) has ensued since September 2015, however, the situation remains fragile given lack of trust between the parties to the conflict. From the end of 2014, Ukrainian legislation has restricted freedom of moment of both people and goods, in addition to the cessation of salary and pension payments in the non-governmental controlled areas (NGCAs), increasing hardship for local populations.
  • UKRAINE Donetsk Oblast

    UKRAINE Donetsk Oblast

    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bryhadyrivka Chmyrivka !Komarivka ! Vysche Starobil's'k !Novovodiane Solone !Iziums'ke !Pisky-Rad'kivs'ki Verkhnia !Lozoven'ka Dru!zheliubivka !Novooleksandrivka !Butove !Pokrovka !Novoselivka !Klymivka !Babenkove !Protopopivka ! f U K R A I N E !Novoborove !Zalyman !Tytarivka !Bunakove !Makiivka !Baranykivka Donetsk Oblast !Holubivka !Polovynkyne !Nyzhn'opokrovka h !Ivanivka !Krasnorichens'ke !Lozove (!o International Airport Highway \! National Capital International Boundary !Kapytolivka !Lozovivka !Zavhorodnie Chervonyi Primary Road !! Major Town First Level Admin Boundary Izium ! Domestic Airport ! !Ridkodub Bulhakivka o ! Shakhtar !Chervonyi Oskil !Baidivka !Rubtsi !Karpivka ! Yats! 'kivka h Secondary Road Inte!Prmetreivds'ikaete Town River ! Port Korovii !Nevs'ke ! !Nove !Kamianka Tertiary Road Small Town Surface Waterbody !Iar Railway !Dmytrivka ! !Khvorostianivka !Novokrasnianka Residential/Unclassified Village ! Shul'hynka !Chervonopopivka !Zavody !Kamianka Date Created: 19 Feb 2015 Data sources: WFP, UNGIWG, GeoNames, !Pischane Chervonyi !Hrushuvakha !Oleksandrivka GAUVL,e ©ly kOapenStreetMap Contributors !Malokhatka Contact: [email protected] !Lyman !Mykhailivka !Komyshuvakha Website: www.logcluster.org 0 5 10 20 !Zhytlivka ! Shtormove Prepared by: HQ, OSEP GIS Nova ! !Nadezhdivka The boundaries and names shown and the designations used !Shandryholove !Peremozhne Map Reference: Kilomete!Mryskolaivka Studenok !Kolodiazi !Tykhopillia on this map do not imply official
  • East Ukraine

    East Ukraine

    UKRAINE - East Ukraine For Humanitarian Purposes Only Pre-Conflict and Current Network for Selling Produce Production date : 10 October 2017 Pre-Conflict LUHANSK GCA Current LUHANSK GCA ² SIEVIERODONETSK ! SIEVIERODONETSK ! ! NOVOAIDAR ! NOVOAIDAR LYSYCHANSK ! LYSYCHANSK! SLOVIANSK EAST LUHANSK SLOVIANSK ! EAST LUHANSK POPASNA ! POPASNA ! ! ! KRAMATORSK ! KRAMATORSK ! ! ! BAKHMUT ! ! ! BAKHMUT ! ! ! STANYTSIA! STANYTSIA! BAKHMUT ! ! LUHANSKA DRUZHKIVKA ! LUHANSKA POPASNA ! BAKHMUT POPASNA PERVOMAISK DRUZHKIVKA ! PERVOMAISK ! ! ! LUHANSK ! LUHANSK ! KOSTIANTYNIVKA ! KOSTIANTYNIVKA ! ! ! ALCHEVSK TORETSK ALCHEVSK TORETSK !! ! ! DONETSK GCA TORETSK ! ! DONETSK GCA TORETSK ! ! ! ! ! HORLIVKA LUHANSK NGCA POKROVSK ! HORLIVKA LUHANSK NGCA POKROVSK AVDIIVKA AVDIIVKA ! ! KHRUSTALNYI KHRUSTALNYI ! AVDIIVKA ! SELYDOVE ! SELYDOVE ANTRATSYT AVDIIVKA ANTRATSYT YASYNUVATA YASYNUVATA SHAKHTARSK SHAKHTARSK ! MAKIIVKA MAKIIVKA KRASNOHORIVKA ! SNIZHNE KURAKHOVE ! !DONETSK ! DONETSK SNIZHNE WEST WEST DONETSK DONETSK ! ! DONETSK NGCA ! DONETSK NGCA ! ! ! ! VOLNOVAKHA ! VOLNOVAKHA ! ! ! ! RUSSIAN RUSSIAN FEDERATION ! FEDERATION SOUTH ! SOUTH DONETSK DONETSK ! !! ! MARIUPOL ! MARIUPOL ! SUMSKA Kms SEA OF AZOV SEA OF AZOV 0 10 20 30 POLTAVSKA KHARKIVSKA Settlements Selling Produce (symbol size Data Sources: LUHANSKA based on number of settlements with citizens Water bodies: © Open Street Map contributors who sold within) Assessed Settlements Administrative boundaries, settlements: OCHA, 2017 ! 1 DNIPROPETROVSKA Selling own agricultural produce connection Service network data: REACH, June 2017 ! ≤ 5 DONETSKA Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 37 N ! ≤ 10 BSU Boundary Contact: [email protected] ZAPORIZKA ! ≤ 15 5km Buffer from INSO Grey Zone RUSSIAN Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free FEDERATION ≤ 30 and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associated, or donors mentioned on this SEA OF AZOV ! INSO Grey Zone (May 2017) map..
  • WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin

    WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin

    WASH Cluster Ukraine Alert Bulletin 01 November - 31 December 2017 Issue 12 WASH Cluster Coordinator OVERALL INCIDENTS ANALYSIS FOR 2017: TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS Mark Buttle [email protected] In 2017 the WASH Cluster recorded 1351 separate incidents in total, each of which put at risk the water supply or sanitation to 4.8 million people served by centralized systems in conflict-affected Eastern Ukraine, with almost WASH Cluster IMOs: 60% occurring in the first 6 months. Volodymyr Kalinin Donetsk oblast experienced 116 incidents: 14 in Government Controlled Areas (GCA) and 102 in Non-Government [email protected] Controlled Areas (NGCA). In Luhansk oblast there were only 19 incidents: 17 in GCA areas and only 2 in NGCA areas. This is not to say Luhansk was less affected: a single incident near Popasna, in April, cut water for around Stas Dymkovskyy 180,000 people for 27 consecutive days. The WASH Cluster notes that people were almost always affected on [email protected] both sides of the Line of the Contact for most incidents. In the overview, all months were different, however there were three main periods of increased activity, when there was heavy shelling around critical water infrastructure along the Line of Contact: February and March; May KEY FACTS to July; and December (see below). Ceasefires were effective only for relatively short-time periods. 135 is the total number of WASH Incidents and their effect, 2017 Of the 135 incidents, WASH incidents since the start 25 7,000,000 of 2017. water infrastructure was damaged or 6,000,000 Geographical breakdown of stopped due to explo- incidents by oblast and by gov- 20 sive risk 80 times; and ernment controlled versus non- 5,000,000 electricity cuts due to government controlled areas: shelling affected water 15 Donetsk Luhansk Total 4,000,000 supply another 46 times.
  • Peace in Ukraine II

    Peace in Ukraine II

    Peace in Ukraine (II): A New Approach to Disengagement Europe Report N°260 | 3 August 2020 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 235 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Minsk Disagreements ....................................................................................................... 4 A. The View from Moscow ............................................................................................. 4 B. Three Ukrainian Perspectives .................................................................................... 4 C. Separatist Detractors ................................................................................................. 5 D. Mixed Minds among Ukraine’s Western Backers ..................................................... 6 III. A New Push for Disengagement ....................................................................................... 8 A. A Big Push .................................................................................................................. 8 B. Dimming Prospects .................................................................................................... 10 IV. More Reasons for
  • UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019

    UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019

    UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian 2019 Situation Report No. 2 © UNICEF/2019/Fillipov UNICEF’s Response with Partners UNICEF 2019 Sector/Cluster 2019 2019 Funds Available UNICEF Cumulative Cluster Cumulative Funds Target results (#) Target results (#) received Nutrition 2,000 0 to date: 1,300,000 n/a Health1 24,800 663 $.6M 3% 2 WASH 1,125,500 361,269 2,000,000 371,365 Child 170,000 18,044 1,300,000 n/a Carry- Protection forward Funding Education 34,500 12,989 200,000 n/a amount: gap: $3.3M HIV & AIDS3 200 0 n/a n/a $17.2M 16% 81% Number of people in need: 3,000,0004 (2019 UNICEF HAC) Number of children in need of humanitarian assistance: 500,0005 (2019 UNICEF HAC) Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs On 31 January, the 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian Response Plan was launched in Kiev jointly with the Ministry of Temporary Occupied Territories (MTOT), requesting US$162 million to provide aid to 2.3 million people affected by the conflict. This includes UNICEF’s requirement of $21,067,799. During the month of February, two Member States briefings were organized – one in New York and the other one in Brussels. On the day of the Member States briefing in New York (12.02.2019), at the initiative of the Russian Government, the Security Council called for a meeting to discuss the humanitarian situation in eastern Ukraine. The Assistant Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Deputy Emergency Relief Coordinator, Ursula Mueller, briefed the Council on the humanitarian situation and its consequences on civilian population, with a special mention on the targeting of water infrastructure and water workers, as 1 UNICEF target additionally includes the estimated 80% immunization coverage of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella and polio vaccines.
  • ENGLISH Only

    ENGLISH Only

    FSC.DEL/32/15 18 February 2015 ENGLISH only Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 780-th FSC Plenary Meeting (18 February 2015 at 10.00, Hofburg) Mr. Chairman, The agreements reached in Minsk in September 2014 and February 2015 must be fully implemented, and no action should be taken that would run contrary to the letter and spirit of these agreements. For its part, Ukraine strictly adheres to the implementation of these agreements as this is the only possible way towards the peaceful resolution in Donbas. In strict compliance with the agreement, reached in Minsk on 12 February 2015, the Ukrainian forces ceased fire along the entire line of contact since 00.00 hrs of 15 February. We proceed from understanding that achieving sustainable and comprehensive ceasefire would be a crucial step towards full implementation of the Minsk agreements of 5 and 19 September 2014 as well as the “Package of Measures” of 12 February 2015. Regrettably, despite the certain decrease of hostilities, the situation in Donbas remains very tense and numerous violations of the ceasefire on the side of the pro-Russian militants have been registered. The total number of violations of the ceasefire by the illegal armed groups over 15 February reached 164. Just on the first day of the ceasefire, Ukrainian positions around Debaltseve were shelled with mortars, artillery and MRLS 88 times. The militants also used tanks to attack the Ukrainian forces. The militants claimed in public that the Minsk agreements, in their opinion, did not relate to the situation around Debaltseve and declared that they would continue attacking the city for they have a “right to shell at Debaltseve as it is their own territory”.