Some Dam – Hydro News

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some Dam – Hydro News SSoommee DDaamm –– HHyyddrroo NNeewwss and Other Stuff i 11/07/2008 Quote of Note: “To lodge all power in one party and keep it there is to insure bad government” - - Mark Twain “Good wine is a necessity of life.” - -Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: Marquis Philips S. Australia Eastern Australia Cabernet, Shiraz, or Sarah’s Blend 2007 DDaammss Conference - FERC Dam Safety Program December 5, 2008, 9:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. Location: Washington, DC Technical conference on FERC Dam Safety Program (AD08-11-000) (Washington, DC) (Free webcast is available) Participants will discuss the major components of the FERC Dam Safety Program as well as current state and industry assistance efforts. They will also explore the challenges facing state dam safety offices to identify needed technical and resource assistance. A free live webcast is available for this meeting. Visit our Dam Safety website The conference will be held at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Commission Meeting Room 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Contact: Natalie Leech @ (202) 502-6396 Erosion could cause western Pa. river dam to fail Associated Press, By DAN NEPHIN 10.28.08, Forbes.com PITTSBURGH, PA - A dam on the Allegheny River is so eroded it could fail if it is hit by a barge or a large ice load, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said it will seek bids to repair the damage. Inspectors found 1 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu more erosion than they anticipated on a recent dive at the Allegheny River Lock and Dam No. 6 near Freeport, a concrete structure about 30 miles upriver from Pittsburgh. For now, there is no immediate threat to public safety and the lock is operational, said Corps spokesman Jeff Hawk. Should the dam fail, a 9-foot- deep pool above it that allows commercial and recreational traffic to navigate would dry up, as would some wetlands and the source of drinking water for some communities. The Corps plans to solicit bids for repairs on Nov. 10. Six contractors attended a preconstruction meeting on Tuesday, but the Corps does not have a cost estimate, Hawk said. Work is expected to be finished in January and river traffic should not be affected. The dam's problems show the need for funding to upgrade the region's aging locks and dams, the Corps said. The Monongahela, Allegheny and Ohio rivers make up a sort of water highway upon which millions of tons of coal, chemicals, metals and other cargo are shipped annually. Locks are essentially water-driven elevators that lift and lower boats so they can pass through dams that control water levels. In July, the Corps outlined its infrastructure problems in the region, saying the 100-year-old lock and dam at Elizabeth, south of Pittsburgh, and those at Emsworth northwest of the city are "critically near failure." Several others are not much better, the Corps said. Much of the work has been deferred because of federal budget constraints. (Wow, a new dam!) Wanahoo dam construction underway By Lisa Brichacek. 10/30/2008, Wahoo Newspapers.com WAHOO, NE - With the sound of dirt mover engines purring in the background, supporters of the Lake Wanahoo project gathered Thursday morning for a celebration. "It's a good day for all of us involved," Lower Platte North Natural Resources District Manager John Miyoshi told those assembled for the groundbreaking ceremony at the site just north of Wahoo. Dirt work on the main embankment for the project began on Monday. Thursday's ceremony was a chance for local officials and area residents to celebrate tangible progress on a project that started back in 1990. "It's just unbelievable this project, with all its ups and downs, has finally come about," Wahoo Mayor Daryl Reitmajer said. Saunders County, City of Wahoo and Lower Platte North NRD are the local sponsors for the dam, lake and recreation area that is expected to cost over $24 million. The Wanahoo site consists of about 1,600 acres in a 2 1/2 mile area directly north of Wahoo. Miyoshi pointed out this was truly a cooperative effort. "This is a community project," he said. "It's bigger than any one sponsor could do alone." In fact over the course of the last 10 years, additional sponsors from the state and federal level joined the project as well. Funding for the project is also being supplied by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, Nebraska Environmental Trust, Nebraska Department of Roads, Department of Environmental Quality and the Nebraska Game and Parks. Representatives from these entities were also on hand for the groundbreaking ceremony. Following the ceremony, all in attendance had a chance to watch as crews from Commercial Contractors of Lincoln continued to move dirt from area of the site to the footprint of the dam. Construction on the embankment is scheduled to be completed by Aug. 31, 2010. Other activities going on at the Wanahoo site include the construction on a breakwater levee and a sediment trap/wetlands basin. Both of these structures are being contracted by the Corps. The levee will sit about mid-point in the lake. It will help to control wind erosion on the lake as well as provide a path for walking trail. The trap/basin is being constructed at the upper end of the lake and will help filter dirt and other sediment from the Sand Creek watershed before it can get into the lake. Bill Mulligan, Chief Civil Works Manager for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Omaha Division, said the Corps is pleased to be a part of the project. "This is a unique project for us," he said. "We're building not just a project with a dam, it's an ecosystem." Mass. sues over safety of 2 Taunton dams Associated Press - October 31, 2008 BOSTON (AP) - Concerns over the structural integrity of 2 Taunton dams has sparked a lawsuit from Attorney General Martha Coakley's office, who said the dams' owner has failed to comply with various safety orders. The complaint, filed in Suffolk Superior Court Thursday, seeks an injunction requiring the owner of the Morey's Bridge Dam and a temporary dam to fix the problems and to pay civil penalties. The two adjacent dams hold back the waters of Lake Sabbatia. Jefferson Development, the registered owner of the Morey's Bridge Dam, and the company's principal, David L. Murphy, of Chestnut Hill, are named in the lawsuit. Messages left at Jefferson Development and for Murphy were not immediately returned Friday. 2 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu Dworshak Dam in N. Idaho a little leaky, but safe By ERIC BARKER | Lewiston Tribune • Published November 01, 2008 OROFINO, Idaho – It's made up of 6.5 million cubic yards of concrete, weighs more than 26 billion pounds and holds back more than 1 trillion gallons of water. At 30 years old it leaks a little bit and has been declared "unsafe or potentially unsafe." That might sound frightening but officials at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers say there is little to worry about - Dworshak Dam is solid and not in danger of failing. "It's as safe now as when it was built," said Dworshak Operations Manager Greg Parker. Then why the rating with such alarming language? Because Dworshak is so large and holds back so much water, a failure would wreak massive damage to life and property in downstream communities like Orofino, Lewiston and beyond. And while the chances of Dworshak failing are deemed low, the consequences are massive. So when corps officials completed a risk assessment of the dam last February, they rated Dworshak a 2 on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the safest. "If the economic consequences are there, it's going to be rated a 2," Parker said. The safety assessment of Dworshak was conducted by a corps team from outside of its Walla Walla district. Members of the team did not visit the dam. Instead they looked at reams of data produced by local engineers. "It's an outside set of eyes," said Bob Hollenbeck, chief of structural design for the Walla Walla district. He said members of the team did debate rating Dworshak a 1 on the 1-to-5 scale. Such a rating would have meant the dam would not be able to operate at full pool. In the end, Hollenbeck said a rating of 2 was arrived at because the uplift pressures beneath the dam were not out of line with design criteria. "I believe it's a very appropriate rating," he said. "We need to be cognizant of everything that is downstream of us." But since the rating was made public earlier this year, the corps has fielded numerous calls from concerned citizens. Joe Saxon, a spokesman for the corps' Walla Walla district, said the agency is aware of the concerns and is trying to be as transparent as possible. "If folks are concerned we'd like to know about it because we'd like to address those concerns," Saxon said. "If we need to talk to service clubs or through the media, we need to do that. We want to be up front as we can to assure the people of the safety here at Dworshak." The dam that blocks the North Fork of the Clearwater River near its mouth does have some issues. Water is squeezing through flex joints, known as water stops, on the front of the dam and even though that leakage doesn't immediately threaten the dam, it needs to be fixed.
Recommended publications
  • ¸2013 Energy & Environmental Newsletters
    ¸2013 Energy & Environmental Newsletters (1200± Studies, Reports & Articles on Energy, Environment, Education, etc.) The Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (AWED) is an informal coalition of individuals and organizations interested in improving national, state, and local energy and environmental policies, world-wide. Our premise is that technical matters (like climate change, our energy options, etc.) should be addressed by using Real Science. (Please see WiseEnergy.org for more information). A key element of AWED’s efforts is public education. Towards that end, every 2-4 weeks we put together a Newsletter to try to balance what is found in the mainstream media about Energy and Environmental issues. (More recently we have also included articles about Science and Education.) We appreciate MasterResource for their assistance in publishing the Newsletters. Note 1: The Newsletters are intended to complement what’s on our website: WiseEnergy.org. Note 2: For links to other excellent sources of articles on Energy and Environmental matters please see the “Current News” page on our website. Note 3: The purpose of this extensive compilation is to make it easier to search for pertinent studies, reports and articles on a specific topic (e.g. wind energy interference with the military). It is advisable to try multiple search words — e.g. military, army, navy, etc. (Search terms are case insensitive over this HTML document.) Note 4: We originally verified that all the links below worked. — but over time these can change. If you find any errors, please email John Droz [aaprjohn at northnet dot org] and we will try to make corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen John Stadler
    STEPHEN JOHN STADLER Professor Fall 2018 Address: Department of Geography Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-4073 Phones: Office (405) 744-9172 Home (405) 624-2176 Fax: Office (405) 744-5620 Electronic mail: [email protected] EDUCATION Date Institution Degree 1979 Indiana State University Ph.D (Physical Geography) 1976 Miami University M.A. (Geography) 1973 Miami University B.S. Ed., Cum Laude, (Social Studies) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2017-Date National Geographic Society Geography Steward of Oklahoma 2015-Date State Geographer Emeritus of Oklahoma (gubernatorial designation) 1993-Date Professor, Department of Geography Oklahoma State University 2013-Date President, Oklahoma Alliance for Geography Education 2012-Date Member, Smart Energy Source team 2011-Date Member, National Energy Solutions Institute committee, Oklahoma State University 2009-Date Geography Program Advisory Board, University of Central Oklahoma 2008-2008 Elected Representative, Oklahoma State University Faculty Council 2008-Date Wind Turbine Program advisory board, Oklahoma State University—Oklahoma City 2008-Date Geography Program advisory board, University of Central Oklahoma 2004-2015 The State Geographer of Oklahoma (gubernatorial appointment) 2004-Date Member, State GIS Council 2004-Date Board Member, Oklahoma Alliance for Geographic Education 1988-Date Steering Committee, Oklahoma Mesonetwork Project 1991-1994 Faculty Supervisor, OSU Center for Applications of Remote Sensing 1985-1993 Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University. 1980-1985 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University. 1979-1980 Temporary Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Michigan State University. Spring 1979 Instructor, Indiana State University Short Course in Remote Sensing. Spring 1978 Lecturer, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Indiana University - Purdue University at Fort Wayne.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Dam – Hydro Newstm
    4/3/2020 Some Dam – Hydro News TM And Other Stuff i Quote of Note: “If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free!” - P.J. O'Rourk [see photos on last page] Some Dam - Hydro News Newsletter Archive for Current and Back Issues and Search: (Hold down Ctrl key when clicking on this link) http://npdp.stanford.edu/ . After clicking on link, scroll down under Partners/Newsletters on left, click one of the links (Current issue or View Back Issues). “Good wine is a necessity of life.” - -Thomas Jefferson [see photos on last page] Ron’s wine pick of the week: 2018 Herdade de Sao Miguel Portugal Red "Do Sul Red" “No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap.” - - Thomas Jefferson Dams: (Yes, there are many unused dams, but there are many that provide valuable benefits to society; namely hydroelectric power, recreation, flood control, irrigation. transportation, and many more.) America thrived by choking its rivers with dams. Now it’s time to undo the damage. The country must decide the fate of more than 90,000 dams, many of which are in disrepair. By Kate Morgan, March 13, 2020, popsci.com The fish is nearly three feet long, and as it swims unhurriedly past the viewing window in Lower Granite Dam, Theresa Wilson glances up from her knitting. “Chinook,” she says, tapping her computer keyboard once to record its passage. The salmon pauses as if to be admired. Its mottled scales flash as it moves against the current of the Snake River.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Is Not the Answer
    WIND ENERGY IS NOT THE ANSWER by Bradley S. Tupii Abstract. Wind energy is not the answer to climate change concerns and cannot do the heavy lifting required by the modern American economy. It would take hundreds of thousands of wind turbines to make a substantial contribution to America’s energy needs. Building so many turbines inevitably causes conflicts with human and animal habitats. Wind turbine noise is a serious problem for those who live in the vicinity of so-called wind farms. * * * Introduction. Wind energy is not a modern phenomenon. Man harnessed the wind with sailboats and windmills hundreds of years ago. Charles Brush developed a wind-powered electric generator in 1888.2 Small, wind-powered generators such as the Jacobs Wind-Electric Machine became popular in the Midwest in the early 20th Century.3 These windmills became obsolete when Depression-era programs brought more reliable electric power to rural areas.4 Wind energy began a slow resurgence during the Carter administration when the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 19785 fostered state tax incentives for wind power development and allowed non-utility energy producers to sell electricity to utilities.6 Currently, wind power is hailed by some as a key weapon in the battle against global warming and as an important contributor to American energy independence. This paper will argue that wind energy is neither. Wind power cannot generate enough reliable electricity to replace conventional energy sources, including those that generate greenhouse gases. Assuming for the sake of argument that carbon dioxide is contributing to global climate change, wind power will not materially reduce CO2 emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Report
    AN EXAMINATION OF THE COMMUNITY LEVEL DYNAMICS RELATED TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WIND ENERGY IN INDIANA Report June 2020 Prepared by Z. Bednarikova, R. Hillberry, N. Nguyen, I. Kumar, T. Inani, M. Gordon, M. Wilcox Purdue Extension – Community Development Purdue University – College of Agriculture Purdue Center for Regional Development 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 6 PROFILE OF THE WIND ENERGY SECTOR IN INDIANA ................................................................................... 7 I. Indiana’s wind resource ......................................................................................................................... 8 II. The footprint of utility-scale wind energy generation in Indiana ....................................................... 12 III. The wind industry as a source of income .......................................................................................... 15 IV. Payments to local governments ........................................................................................................ 22 V. Policy ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of the Wind Energy Sector in Indiana
    PROFILE OF THE WIND ENERGY SECTOR IN INDIANA In 2008, Indiana’s first utility-scale wind farm went into operation near the small town of Earl Park in Benton County. Spurred on by generous federal subsidies, a number of subsequent wind farms in Benton County and neighboring White County came on-line in 2009 and 2010.1 Subsequent technological developments have led to further growth of the industry in Indiana, even as the size and scope of federal subsidies have been substantially reduced. Indiana’s wind power generation sector has since grown through further large investments in Benton and White Counties, and through the introduction of three more large farms with footprints in Tipton, Madison, Jay and Randolph counties.2 Recent technological developments - notably the development of much taller turbines - have made much of northern Indiana viable for hosting utility-scale wind power generation, even as geographic spread of the industry has fostered local resistance. Many Indiana county governments have taken explicit and/or implicit actions to impede the utility-scale wind power in their localities. In this section of the report, we offer some descriptive background on the utility-scale wind sector in Indiana. We describe Indiana’s wind resource, technological developments that have improved the economic viability of utility-scale investments, as well as the industry’s footprint in the state. We describe the form and approximate value of the industry’s payments to the local governments and residents. Finally, we summarize state, local and federal policies towards the development of the wind industry. 1 The arrival of the wind power sector in Indiana coincides with a national boom in the construction of such facilities – a boom that was made possible by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the federal stimulus designed to offset the effects of the global financial crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 Indianapolis, Indiana June 21, 2007 2 1:15 PM
    1 Indianapolis, Indiana June 21, 2007 2 1:15 P.M. (EDT) 3 4 5 JUDGE STORMS: Let's go ahead and 6 go back on the record. 7 I believe we are to the point for 8 the Industrial Intervenors to present their 9 case. Ms. Dodd, you may proceed. 10 MS. DODD: Yes. Pursuant to a 11 stipulation of all of the other parties, the 12 Indiana Industrial Group offers the -- Exhibit 13 1, which is the direct testimony of Nicholas 14 Phillips with attachments including NP-1. 15 Industrial Group offers Exhibit 2, 16 which is the direct testimony of Michael 17 Gorman with attachments including MPG-1. 18 The Industrial Group also offers 19 Confidential Exhibit 2, which is the -- are 20 Schedules 2 and 3 of MPG-1. 21 The Industrial Group offers 22 Exhibit 3, which is the cross-answering 23 testimony of Nicholas Phillips. 24 We also would seek leave to file 25 corrected testimony because we've discovered K- 1 1 there are one or two typos in Mr. Phillips' 2 testimony. 3 JUDGE STORMS: Okay. Is that 4 included with what you're offering with these 5 exhibits? 6 MS. DODD: Yes, that would be 7 included. 8 JUDGE STORMS: Okay, and there's 9 no objection to that from the parties as well, 10 I'm assuming. 11 Okay, is there anything further? 12 MS. DODD: Only to notify all 13 parties and the Bench that we will be filing 14 an amended Appendix A to update the members in 15 the Industrial Group in this proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2020
    TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION .................................................... 3 Financial and Operational Effects of NON-IFRS MEASURES .......................................... 3 Environmental Protection Requirements ........... 42 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON Employees ....................................................... 42 Social and Environmental Protection Policies .... 42 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION .................... 3 RISK MANAGEMENT AND RISK FACTORS ...........44 CORPORATE STRUCTURE .................................... 8 DIVIDENDS ..........................................................44 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ...... 9 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE.............45 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS .......................................... 9 THREE-YEAR SUMMARY ........................................... 10 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 45 Financial Year 2020 .......................................... 10 Common Shares .............................................. 45 Financial Year 2019 .......................................... 12 Preferred Shares ............................................. 45 Financial Year 2018 .......................................... 14 Series A Shares and Series B Shares ............... 46 INDUSTRY OVERVIEW AND PRINCIPAL Series C Shares ............................................... 47 4.75% Convertible Debentures ........................ 48 MARKETS ........................................................... 16 4.65% Convertible Debentures ........................ 49 RENEWABLE POWER
    [Show full text]
  • Paulding I Economic Impact Study
    WILDCAT WIND FARM I REVENUE BENEFITS FOR MADISON COUNTY 1. Estimated Additional Property Tax Revenues $ 22.5 Million . Estimated Property Tax Revenue (2014-2024) $5,440,000 . Estimated Annual Property Tax Revenue (2024 and beyond) $750,000-$1,000,000 . 15-year total $9,000,000- $10,000,000 . 30-year total $20,000,000-25,000,000 Estimated 15-year Property Tax Revenue to Taxing Districts within Project Area Approximate Proportion Taxing District Approximate 15-Year Total of Local Tax Revenue Madison Grant School District 38% $3,500,000 Elwood School District 9% $800,000 County (excl. Bridges) 31% $2,900,000 Bridges 1.5% $140,000 Duck Creek Township 12% $1,100,000 Boone Township 0.3% $24,000 Pipe Creek Township 0.3% $26,000 Library 7% $700,000 Solid Waste 0.4% $35,000 2. Landowner Royalties $500,000-750,000/year . 30-year total estimate, assumes 2% annual increase in price of power $22-28 Million 3. Economic Development Donations $1.2 Million To be used to stimulate further economic development in the County. 4. Permit Fees $180,000 5. Estimated Road Upgrade/Rebuild Investment $3 Million - $6 Million Upgrades will be made to County and Township roads within the Project Area used during the construction process. Post construction, these roads will be restored to the same or in nearly all cases better than original condition. This range is typical of E.ON’s experience in the Midwest TOTAL DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFIT: $48,000,000 to $60,000,000 1 To: Madison County Commissioners and Planning Commission From: E.ON Climate & Renewables Subject: Wildcat Wind Farm I - Summary of Potential Economic Impacts on Madison County Date: May 2, 2011 E.ON Climate & Renewables (EC&R) evaluated the economic impacts of constructing and operating the proposed Wildcat Wind Farm I project in Madison and Tipton Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Projects on Indian Lands
    Project ID Name O wner Valuation 01-658114 Carson Tahoe Regional Medical Center Carson Tahoe Hospital $50,000.00 01-782563 ID/DOT SH97 Beauty Creek Bridge Replacement Idaho Transportation Department $650,000.00 01-868289 San Carlos Unified School District San Carlos Unified School District #20 $12,500,000.00 01011970 Savoy G-R N/G Fired 1200MW Pattillo Branch Power Plant Pattillo Branch Power Co. LLC $900,000,000.00 01012465 Deweyville-Canal 345KV Switching Station Kelson Transmission Co. $16,000,000.00 02-830557 Washoe Medical Center South Meadows Renown Health $5,000,000.00 02-868112 Clear Creek WWTP Reh/Expansion City of Redding $20,000,000.00 02004642 Baldwin 150MW Teche Peaking Unit Additions CLECO Power LLC $150,000,000.00 02005546 Hanna G-R 500MW Red River Parish Coal Fired Power Plant Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana $750,000,000.00 PROJECT LOCATIONS AND INDIAN LANDS 02005891 LA Place 582MW Coal/PET Coke Little Gypsy #3 Repower Entergy Operations $1,500,000,000.00 02006246 Pineville 23MW Hydro Red River L&D 02 Powerhouse Addition Bost2 Hydroelectric LLC $50,000,000.00 02006250 Coultierville 49MW Red River L&D 3 Powerhouse Addition Bost3 Hydroelectric LLC $100,000,000.00 02006253 Coushatta 27MW Red River L&D 4 Powerhouse Addition Bost4 Hydroelectric LLC $50,000,000.00 Jamestown Reservation Lummi Reservation 02006272 Baldwin Gas 349MW Teche Unit #3 550MW Repower CLECO Power LLC $400,000,000.00 02006611 Hahnville Nuclear 1152MW Unit 03 Entergy Louisiana LLC $12,000,000.00 Lower Elwha Reservation Samish Indian Nooksack Reservation Tribe,
    [Show full text]
  • Benton County Wind Farm LLC Loraine L
    Benton County Wind Farm LLC Loraine L. Seyfried Administrative Law Judge Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission WhyWhy WindWind Energy?Energy? More than 9,100 MW of wind power projects are installed in 30 states. This number will increase to approximately 12,000 MW by the end of 2006, with the equivalent of more than 3 million homes being served by wind-generated electricity. INSTALLED MW OF WIND POWER PER STATE Published by the American Wind Energy Association - Updated April 24, 2005 TOTAL INSTALLED U.S. WIND ENERGY CAPACITY: 9,149 MW as of Dec 31, 2005 Graphic: U.S. Installed Capacity, 1981 - 2005 Published by the American Wind Energy Association - December 31, 2005 WhyWhy WindWind Energy?Energy? Wind is free and inexhaustible Wind is a widely-available domestic resource Wind energy supports agriculture and rural areas − A second crop for farmers due to lease payments for placement of windmills. Generating electricity from wind does not pollute the air or water or emit greenhouse gases Cost of electricity from wind farms is competitive with costs from new fossil fueled power plants Wind is a hedge against continuing increases in the costs of fossil fuels and increasing restrictions on pollution from fossil-fueled power plants OrionOrion EnergyEnergy LLCLLC Orion’s management team has experience in the wind industry going back more than 20 years − Prior to founding Orion, Orion’s principals were integrally involved in the development, construction and operations and maintenance of wind energy projects in the U.S., Canada, Latin America, Europe and Asia Sister company RDC Development Ltd. in the U.K.
    [Show full text]