DOCSLIB.ORG

Paulding I Economic Impact Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WILDCAT WIND FARM I REVENUE BENEFITS FOR MADISON COUNTY 1. Estimated Additional Property Tax Revenues $ 22.5 Million . Estimated Property Tax Revenue (2014-2024) $5,440,000 . Estimated Annual Property Tax Revenue (2024 and beyond) $750,000-$1,000,000 . 15-year total $9,000,000- $10,000,000 . 30-year total $20,000,000-25,000,000 Estimated 15-year Property Tax Revenue to Taxing Districts within Project Area Approximate Proportion Taxing District Approximate 15-Year Total of Local Tax Revenue Madison Grant School District 38% $3,500,000 Elwood School District 9% $800,000 County (excl. Bridges) 31% $2,900,000 Bridges 1.5% $140,000 Duck Creek Township 12% $1,100,000 Boone Township 0.3% $24,000 Pipe Creek Township 0.3% $26,000 Library 7% $700,000 Solid Waste 0.4% $35,000 2. Landowner Royalties $500,000-750,000/year . 30-year total estimate, assumes 2% annual increase in price of power $22-28 Million 3. Economic Development Donations $1.2 Million To be used to stimulate further economic development in the County. 4. Permit Fees $180,000 5. Estimated Road Upgrade/Rebuild Investment $3 Million - $6 Million Upgrades will be made to County and Township roads within the Project Area used during the construction process. Post construction, these roads will be restored to the same or in nearly all cases better than original condition. This range is typical of E.ON’s experience in the Midwest TOTAL DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFIT: $48,000,000 to $60,000,000 1 To: Madison County Commissioners and Planning Commission From: E.ON Climate & Renewables Subject: Wildcat Wind Farm I - Summary of Potential Economic Impacts on Madison County Date: May 2, 2011 E.ON Climate & Renewables (EC&R) evaluated the economic impacts of constructing and operating the proposed Wildcat Wind Farm I project in Madison and Tipton Counties. Total investment in the wind farm will be approximately $350-400 million, half of which will be in the Madison County portion of the project. The project is expected to be constructed over an 8-12 month period beginning in early 2012. This analysis concludes that the project will result in a positive economic impact to the County, including the creation of jobs as well as an increase in local spending. The project will also confer land lease payments to participating landowners. The analysis is based on reasonable assumptions of future expenditure patterns for constructing and operating the proposed wind farm. Findings should not be taken as precise projections of future performance, but rather provide insight into the likely economic impact of the project. Economic impacts were estimated using an input-output model designed by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) called the Jobs and Economic Impact (JEDI) model, which estimates the economic impacts of constructing and operating power generation facilities. Demographic and project specific data for Madison County was used to further refine results. A detailed description of the JEDI model can be found at http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/jedi/about_jedi.html. Summary of Economic Impact Wind farms and other economic investments that bring new dollars and jobs to a locale and are measured using three components of economic impact: direct, indirect and induced impacts, which are described below: Direct impacts are immediate, project development and onsite labor impacts created by expenditures that are directly applied to the project and include expenditures on engineers, project developers, construction crews, road builders, turbine erection crews, crane operators, etc. Indirect impacts, or secondary supply chain impacts, are generated by expenditures on equipment, materials and services for the construction or subsequent operation of the wind farm though spending on those supportive businesses. Examples include concrete manufacturers, equipment, spare parts, transportation, and also professional services. Induced impacts reflect overall increases in household spending, as income increases due to additional economic activity created by the project. Induced impacts result when people spend money for their personal needs, not project needs, such as food, clothing, housing, day care, medical care and insurance. For the purpose of this analysis, the term “job” is classified as one full-time equivalent (FTE) job. One FTE is equal to one person working full-time for one year, or 2,080 working hours (52 weeks, 40 hours per week). Local Economic Impact: Construction Phase Jobs, wages, and salaries. As shown in Table 1, the project is projected to create approximately 30-60 jobs through the direct impacts associated with the project, generating approximately $3 million in earnings. This estimate represents the estimated number of local jobs directly involved in the project construction. The indirect impacts of the project are projected to create another 150-200 jobs, generating approximately $12 million in earnings. Induced impacts are projected to generate another 30-100 jobs and approximately $3.5 million in earnings. Local expenditures. The direct impacts of the project are limited to on-site project costs, and are projected to generate approximately $200,000 in local spending in Madison County during the construction phase of the project. The majority of local spending that is projected to occur during the construction phase will occur as a result of the indirect impacts of the project. It is projected that the proposed wind farm will generate approximately $29 million in 1 local expenditures as a result of the indirect impacts of the project. The induced impacts associated with the project are projected to generate approximately $7 million in local expenditures. In all, the total estimated economic impact of jobs, earnings and local expenditures is anticipated to have a combined total local benefit to Madison County of approximately $54.7 million during the 8-12 month construction phase of the project and create approximately 200-360 jobs. Figure 1: Estimated Benefits to Madison County during Construction Phase Impact Type Approximate Jobs (FTE) Wages and Salaries Local Expenditures Total Local Benefit Direct Impacts ~ 30-60 ~ $3,000,000 ~ $200,000 ~ $3,200,000 Indirect Impacts ~ 150-200 ~ $12,000,000 ~ $29,000,000 ~ $41,000,000 Induced Impacts ~ 30-100 ~ $3,500,000 ~ $7,000,000 ~ $10,500,000 Total Impacts ~ 200-360 ~ $18,500,000 ~ $36,200,000 ~ $54,700,000 Source: JEDI Wind. Note: Amounts rounded to the nearest hundred thousand dollars. Local Economic Impact: Operations and Management Phase Jobs, wages, and salaries. The direct impacts associated with the project are projected to create approximately 4-6 jobs in Madison County, generating approximately $250,000 annually in earnings. This includes jobs that are directly involved with the ongoing operations of the project. Another 8-10 jobs are projected to be generated by the indirect impacts of the project, generating a total of approximately $400,000 in wages and salaries annually. Induced impacts associated with the project are projected to create an additional 8-10 jobs in Madison County, generating approximately $400,000 in earnings. Local expenditures. The direct impacts of the project are limited to on-site project costs, and are projected to generate approximately $50,000 annually in local spending. The majority of spending projected to occur within Madison County during the operations phase of the project will occur as a result of the indirect impacts of the project. It is projected that each year the proposed wind farm is in operation, approximately $2.6 million on local expenditures will be generated as a result of the indirect impacts associated with the project. Induced impacts are projected to generate another $800,000 each year in local spending. As summarized in Figure 2, the total estimated economic impact of jobs, earnings and local expenditures is anticipated to have a combined total local benefit to Madison County of approximately $4.6 million annually during the ongoing operations of the project, and is expected to create approximately 20-26 jobs. Figure 2: Estimated Annual Benefits to Madison County during Operations Phase Impact Type Approximate Jobs (FTE) Wages and Salaries Local Expenditures Total Local Benefit Direct Impacts ~ 4-6 ~ $250,000 ~ $50,000 ~$300,000 Indirect Impacts ~ 8-10 ~ $400,000 ~ $2,600,000 ~$3,100,000 Induced Impacts ~ 8- 10 ~ $400,000 ~ $800,000 ~$1,200,000 Total Impacts ~20- 26 ~ $1,050,000 ~ $3,450,000 ~ $4,600,000 Source: JEDI Wind. Note: Amounts rounded to the nearest hundred thousand dollars. Land Lease Payments Landowners who lease their property for the project will benefit from the guaranteed income stream the project provides. In addition, land owners who elect to have meteorological towers will receive additional payments. Payments made to participating land owners within the Madison County are projected to total approximately $500,000 to $750,000 each year over the life of the project. These landowner payments are measured as part of the indirect impacts associated with the project, and contribute toward the total local benefit as summarized above. Property Tax Revenue The construction of the proposed wind farm will result in an increase to Madison County’s tax base by approximately $40-60 million. However, the anticipated property tax revenue is not presented as part of this summary. 2 WIND ENERGY FACTS: Indiana Indiana’s impressive wind capacity additions have created economic development throughout the state In 2009 and 2010, Indiana increased its installed wind capacity ten-fold, becoming one of the fastest growing states for wind power. New wind projects have supported new jobs and provided numerous economic benefits. Blue counties have wind projects. Green dots are online wind energy manufacturing facilities. Yellow dots are announced wind energy manufacturing facilities. WIND PROJECTS Currently online: 1,339 megawatts (MW) Added in 2010: 303 MW Added in 2009: 905 MW Wind projects in queue: 8,426 MW Indiana added the second most new wind power capacity of any state in 2009 and was the third fastest-growing state for wind power.
Recommended publications
  • ¸2013 Energy & Environmental Newsletters

    ¸2013 Energy & Environmental Newsletters

    ¸2013 Energy & Environmental Newsletters (1200± Studies, Reports & Articles on Energy, Environment, Education, etc.) The Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (AWED) is an informal coalition of individuals and organizations interested in improving national, state, and local energy and environmental policies, world-wide. Our premise is that technical matters (like climate change, our energy options, etc.) should be addressed by using Real Science. (Please see WiseEnergy.org for more information). A key element of AWED’s efforts is public education. Towards that end, every 2-4 weeks we put together a Newsletter to try to balance what is found in the mainstream media about Energy and Environmental issues. (More recently we have also included articles about Science and Education.) We appreciate MasterResource for their assistance in publishing the Newsletters. Note 1: The Newsletters are intended to complement what’s on our website: WiseEnergy.org. Note 2: For links to other excellent sources of articles on Energy and Environmental matters please see the “Current News” page on our website. Note 3: The purpose of this extensive compilation is to make it easier to search for pertinent studies, reports and articles on a specific topic (e.g. wind energy interference with the military). It is advisable to try multiple search words — e.g. military, army, navy, etc. (Search terms are case insensitive over this HTML document.) Note 4: We originally verified that all the links below worked. — but over time these can change. If you find any errors, please email John Droz [aaprjohn at northnet dot org] and we will try to make corrections.
  • Stephen John Stadler

    Stephen John Stadler

    STEPHEN JOHN STADLER Professor Fall 2018 Address: Department of Geography Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-4073 Phones: Office (405) 744-9172 Home (405) 624-2176 Fax: Office (405) 744-5620 Electronic mail: [email protected] EDUCATION Date Institution Degree 1979 Indiana State University Ph.D (Physical Geography) 1976 Miami University M.A. (Geography) 1973 Miami University B.S. Ed., Cum Laude, (Social Studies) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2017-Date National Geographic Society Geography Steward of Oklahoma 2015-Date State Geographer Emeritus of Oklahoma (gubernatorial designation) 1993-Date Professor, Department of Geography Oklahoma State University 2013-Date President, Oklahoma Alliance for Geography Education 2012-Date Member, Smart Energy Source team 2011-Date Member, National Energy Solutions Institute committee, Oklahoma State University 2009-Date Geography Program Advisory Board, University of Central Oklahoma 2008-2008 Elected Representative, Oklahoma State University Faculty Council 2008-Date Wind Turbine Program advisory board, Oklahoma State University—Oklahoma City 2008-Date Geography Program advisory board, University of Central Oklahoma 2004-2015 The State Geographer of Oklahoma (gubernatorial appointment) 2004-Date Member, State GIS Council 2004-Date Board Member, Oklahoma Alliance for Geographic Education 1988-Date Steering Committee, Oklahoma Mesonetwork Project 1991-1994 Faculty Supervisor, OSU Center for Applications of Remote Sensing 1985-1993 Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University. 1980-1985 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University. 1979-1980 Temporary Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Michigan State University. Spring 1979 Instructor, Indiana State University Short Course in Remote Sensing. Spring 1978 Lecturer, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Indiana University - Purdue University at Fort Wayne.
  • Some Dam – Hydro Newstm

    Some Dam – Hydro Newstm

    4/3/2020 Some Dam – Hydro News TM And Other Stuff i Quote of Note: “If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free!” - P.J. O'Rourk [see photos on last page] Some Dam - Hydro News Newsletter Archive for Current and Back Issues and Search: (Hold down Ctrl key when clicking on this link) http://npdp.stanford.edu/ . After clicking on link, scroll down under Partners/Newsletters on left, click one of the links (Current issue or View Back Issues). “Good wine is a necessity of life.” - -Thomas Jefferson [see photos on last page] Ron’s wine pick of the week: 2018 Herdade de Sao Miguel Portugal Red "Do Sul Red" “No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap.” - - Thomas Jefferson Dams: (Yes, there are many unused dams, but there are many that provide valuable benefits to society; namely hydroelectric power, recreation, flood control, irrigation. transportation, and many more.) America thrived by choking its rivers with dams. Now it’s time to undo the damage. The country must decide the fate of more than 90,000 dams, many of which are in disrepair. By Kate Morgan, March 13, 2020, popsci.com The fish is nearly three feet long, and as it swims unhurriedly past the viewing window in Lower Granite Dam, Theresa Wilson glances up from her knitting. “Chinook,” she says, tapping her computer keyboard once to record its passage. The salmon pauses as if to be admired. Its mottled scales flash as it moves against the current of the Snake River.
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
  • Wind Energy Is Not the Answer

    Wind Energy Is Not the Answer

    WIND ENERGY IS NOT THE ANSWER by Bradley S. Tupii Abstract. Wind energy is not the answer to climate change concerns and cannot do the heavy lifting required by the modern American economy. It would take hundreds of thousands of wind turbines to make a substantial contribution to America’s energy needs. Building so many turbines inevitably causes conflicts with human and animal habitats. Wind turbine noise is a serious problem for those who live in the vicinity of so-called wind farms. * * * Introduction. Wind energy is not a modern phenomenon. Man harnessed the wind with sailboats and windmills hundreds of years ago. Charles Brush developed a wind-powered electric generator in 1888.2 Small, wind-powered generators such as the Jacobs Wind-Electric Machine became popular in the Midwest in the early 20th Century.3 These windmills became obsolete when Depression-era programs brought more reliable electric power to rural areas.4 Wind energy began a slow resurgence during the Carter administration when the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 19785 fostered state tax incentives for wind power development and allowed non-utility energy producers to sell electricity to utilities.6 Currently, wind power is hailed by some as a key weapon in the battle against global warming and as an important contributor to American energy independence. This paper will argue that wind energy is neither. Wind power cannot generate enough reliable electricity to replace conventional energy sources, including those that generate greenhouse gases. Assuming for the sake of argument that carbon dioxide is contributing to global climate change, wind power will not materially reduce CO2 emissions.
  • Wind Energy Report

    Wind Energy Report

    AN EXAMINATION OF THE COMMUNITY LEVEL DYNAMICS RELATED TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WIND ENERGY IN INDIANA Report June 2020 Prepared by Z. Bednarikova, R. Hillberry, N. Nguyen, I. Kumar, T. Inani, M. Gordon, M. Wilcox Purdue Extension – Community Development Purdue University – College of Agriculture Purdue Center for Regional Development 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 6 PROFILE OF THE WIND ENERGY SECTOR IN INDIANA ................................................................................... 7 I. Indiana’s wind resource ......................................................................................................................... 8 II. The footprint of utility-scale wind energy generation in Indiana ....................................................... 12 III. The wind industry as a source of income .......................................................................................... 15 IV. Payments to local governments ........................................................................................................ 22 V. Policy ..................................................................................................................................................
  • Profile of the Wind Energy Sector in Indiana

    Profile of the Wind Energy Sector in Indiana

    PROFILE OF THE WIND ENERGY SECTOR IN INDIANA In 2008, Indiana’s first utility-scale wind farm went into operation near the small town of Earl Park in Benton County. Spurred on by generous federal subsidies, a number of subsequent wind farms in Benton County and neighboring White County came on-line in 2009 and 2010.1 Subsequent technological developments have led to further growth of the industry in Indiana, even as the size and scope of federal subsidies have been substantially reduced. Indiana’s wind power generation sector has since grown through further large investments in Benton and White Counties, and through the introduction of three more large farms with footprints in Tipton, Madison, Jay and Randolph counties.2 Recent technological developments - notably the development of much taller turbines - have made much of northern Indiana viable for hosting utility-scale wind power generation, even as geographic spread of the industry has fostered local resistance. Many Indiana county governments have taken explicit and/or implicit actions to impede the utility-scale wind power in their localities. In this section of the report, we offer some descriptive background on the utility-scale wind sector in Indiana. We describe Indiana’s wind resource, technological developments that have improved the economic viability of utility-scale investments, as well as the industry’s footprint in the state. We describe the form and approximate value of the industry’s payments to the local governments and residents. Finally, we summarize state, local and federal policies towards the development of the wind industry. 1 The arrival of the wind power sector in Indiana coincides with a national boom in the construction of such facilities – a boom that was made possible by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the federal stimulus designed to offset the effects of the global financial crisis.
  • 1 1 Indianapolis, Indiana June 21, 2007 2 1:15 PM

    1 1 Indianapolis, Indiana June 21, 2007 2 1:15 PM

    1 Indianapolis, Indiana June 21, 2007 2 1:15 P.M. (EDT) 3 4 5 JUDGE STORMS: Let's go ahead and 6 go back on the record. 7 I believe we are to the point for 8 the Industrial Intervenors to present their 9 case. Ms. Dodd, you may proceed. 10 MS. DODD: Yes. Pursuant to a 11 stipulation of all of the other parties, the 12 Indiana Industrial Group offers the -- Exhibit 13 1, which is the direct testimony of Nicholas 14 Phillips with attachments including NP-1. 15 Industrial Group offers Exhibit 2, 16 which is the direct testimony of Michael 17 Gorman with attachments including MPG-1. 18 The Industrial Group also offers 19 Confidential Exhibit 2, which is the -- are 20 Schedules 2 and 3 of MPG-1. 21 The Industrial Group offers 22 Exhibit 3, which is the cross-answering 23 testimony of Nicholas Phillips. 24 We also would seek leave to file 25 corrected testimony because we've discovered K- 1 1 there are one or two typos in Mr. Phillips' 2 testimony. 3 JUDGE STORMS: Okay. Is that 4 included with what you're offering with these 5 exhibits? 6 MS. DODD: Yes, that would be 7 included. 8 JUDGE STORMS: Okay, and there's 9 no objection to that from the parties as well, 10 I'm assuming. 11 Okay, is there anything further? 12 MS. DODD: Only to notify all 13 parties and the Bench that we will be filing 14 an amended Appendix A to update the members in 15 the Industrial Group in this proceeding.
  • Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2020

    Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2020

    TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION .................................................... 3 Financial and Operational Effects of NON-IFRS MEASURES .......................................... 3 Environmental Protection Requirements ........... 42 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON Employees ....................................................... 42 Social and Environmental Protection Policies .... 42 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION .................... 3 RISK MANAGEMENT AND RISK FACTORS ...........44 CORPORATE STRUCTURE .................................... 8 DIVIDENDS ..........................................................44 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ...... 9 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE.............45 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS .......................................... 9 THREE-YEAR SUMMARY ........................................... 10 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 45 Financial Year 2020 .......................................... 10 Common Shares .............................................. 45 Financial Year 2019 .......................................... 12 Preferred Shares ............................................. 45 Financial Year 2018 .......................................... 14 Series A Shares and Series B Shares ............... 46 INDUSTRY OVERVIEW AND PRINCIPAL Series C Shares ............................................... 47 4.75% Convertible Debentures ........................ 48 MARKETS ........................................................... 16 4.65% Convertible Debentures ........................ 49 RENEWABLE POWER

  • Map of Projects on Indian Lands

    Project ID Name O wner Valuation 01-658114 Carson Tahoe Regional Medical Center Carson Tahoe Hospital $50,000.00 01-782563 ID/DOT SH97 Beauty Creek Bridge Replacement Idaho Transportation Department $650,000.00 01-868289 San Carlos Unified School District San Carlos Unified School District #20 $12,500,000.00 01011970 Savoy G-R N/G Fired 1200MW Pattillo Branch Power Plant Pattillo Branch Power Co. LLC $900,000,000.00 01012465 Deweyville-Canal 345KV Switching Station Kelson Transmission Co. $16,000,000.00 02-830557 Washoe Medical Center South Meadows Renown Health $5,000,000.00 02-868112 Clear Creek WWTP Reh/Expansion City of Redding $20,000,000.00 02004642 Baldwin 150MW Teche Peaking Unit Additions CLECO Power LLC $150,000,000.00 02005546 Hanna G-R 500MW Red River Parish Coal Fired Power Plant Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana $750,000,000.00 PROJECT LOCATIONS AND INDIAN LANDS 02005891 LA Place 582MW Coal/PET Coke Little Gypsy #3 Repower Entergy Operations $1,500,000,000.00 02006246 Pineville 23MW Hydro Red River L&D 02 Powerhouse Addition Bost2 Hydroelectric LLC $50,000,000.00 02006250 Coultierville 49MW Red River L&D 3 Powerhouse Addition Bost3 Hydroelectric LLC $100,000,000.00 02006253 Coushatta 27MW Red River L&D 4 Powerhouse Addition Bost4 Hydroelectric LLC $50,000,000.00 Jamestown Reservation Lummi Reservation 02006272 Baldwin Gas 349MW Teche Unit #3 550MW Repower CLECO Power LLC $400,000,000.00 02006611 Hahnville Nuclear 1152MW Unit 03 Entergy Louisiana LLC $12,000,000.00 Lower Elwha Reservation Samish Indian Nooksack Reservation Tribe,
  • Benton County Wind Farm LLC Loraine L

    Benton County Wind Farm LLC Loraine L

    Benton County Wind Farm LLC Loraine L. Seyfried Administrative Law Judge Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission WhyWhy WindWind Energy?Energy? More than 9,100 MW of wind power projects are installed in 30 states. This number will increase to approximately 12,000 MW by the end of 2006, with the equivalent of more than 3 million homes being served by wind-generated electricity. INSTALLED MW OF WIND POWER PER STATE Published by the American Wind Energy Association - Updated April 24, 2005 TOTAL INSTALLED U.S. WIND ENERGY CAPACITY: 9,149 MW as of Dec 31, 2005 Graphic: U.S. Installed Capacity, 1981 - 2005 Published by the American Wind Energy Association - December 31, 2005 WhyWhy WindWind Energy?Energy? Wind is free and inexhaustible Wind is a widely-available domestic resource Wind energy supports agriculture and rural areas − A second crop for farmers due to lease payments for placement of windmills. Generating electricity from wind does not pollute the air or water or emit greenhouse gases Cost of electricity from wind farms is competitive with costs from new fossil fueled power plants Wind is a hedge against continuing increases in the costs of fossil fuels and increasing restrictions on pollution from fossil-fueled power plants OrionOrion EnergyEnergy LLCLLC Orion’s management team has experience in the wind industry going back more than 20 years − Prior to founding Orion, Orion’s principals were integrally involved in the development, construction and operations and maintenance of wind energy projects in the U.S., Canada, Latin America, Europe and Asia Sister company RDC Development Ltd. in the U.K.
  • Some Dam – Hydro News

    Some Dam – Hydro News

    SSoommee DDaamm –– HHyyddrroo NNeewwss and Other Stuff i 11/07/2008 Quote of Note: “To lodge all power in one party and keep it there is to insure bad government” - - Mark Twain “Good wine is a necessity of life.” - -Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: Marquis Philips S. Australia Eastern Australia Cabernet, Shiraz, or Sarah’s Blend 2007 DDaammss Conference - FERC Dam Safety Program December 5, 2008, 9:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. Location: Washington, DC Technical conference on FERC Dam Safety Program (AD08-11-000) (Washington, DC) (Free webcast is available) Participants will discuss the major components of the FERC Dam Safety Program as well as current state and industry assistance efforts. They will also explore the challenges facing state dam safety offices to identify needed technical and resource assistance. A free live webcast is available for this meeting. Visit our Dam Safety website The conference will be held at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Commission Meeting Room 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Contact: Natalie Leech @ (202) 502-6396 Erosion could cause western Pa. river dam to fail Associated Press, By DAN NEPHIN 10.28.08, Forbes.com PITTSBURGH, PA - A dam on the Allegheny River is so eroded it could fail if it is hit by a barge or a large ice load, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said it will seek bids to repair the damage. Inspectors found 1 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu more erosion than they anticipated on a recent dive at the Allegheny River Lock and Dam No.