DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of the Interaction Between the Human

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of the Interaction Between the Human VARIATIONS IN THE V3 CROWN OF HIV-1 ENVELOPE IMPACT AFFINITY FOR CCR5 AND AFFECT ENTRY AND REPLICATIVE FITNESS By MICHAEL ANDREW LOBRITZ Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation advisor: Eric J. Arts, Ph.D. Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August 2007 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of ______________________________________________________ candidate for the Ph.D. degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction........................................................................................................................16 1.A. HIV and AIDS..............................................................................................17 1.B. Retroviruses: Structure, Organization, and Replication...............................20 1.B.1. HIV-1 Genome...............................................................................20 1.B.2. HIV-1 Particle................................................................................23 1.B.3. HIV-1 Replication..........................................................................26 1.B.3.a. Transmission and Replication Dynamics........................26 1.B.3.a. Host Cell Tropism and Replication.................................26 1.B.3.b. HIV-1 Envelope and Host Cell Entry.............................29 1.B.3.c. Reverse Transcription......................................................33 1.B.3.d. Nuclear Translocation and Integration............................36 1.B.3.e. Transcription and RNA Export.......................................39 1.B.3.f. Assembly, Budding and Maturation................................42 1.B.3.g. HIV-1 Accessory Proteins...............................................43 1.D. Antiretroviral Therapy...................................................................................44 1.E. HIV-1 Receptors and Implications of Tropism.............................................47 1.F. Interaction of HIV-1 Envelope and CCR5....................................................50 1.G. Inhibition of HIV-1 Entry.............................................................................55 1.G.1. Attachment Inhibitors....................................................................55 1.G.2. Fusion Inhibitors and Mechanisms of Resistance..........................57 1.G.3. Coreceptor Inhibitors and Mechansims of Resistance...................59 2 1.G.3.a. Chemokine Analogs........................................................59 1.G.3.b. Small Molecule Antagonists...........................................61 1.G.3.c. Models of Resistance to Coreceptor Inhibitors...............62 1.H. Implication of HIV-1 Entry Efficiency.........................................................68 1.I. Hypotheses......................................................................................................70 Chapter 2: Natural Variation in the V3 Crown of Human Immunodeficiency Virus.......72 Type 1 Affects Replicative Fitness and Entry Inhibitor Sensitivity 2.1. Preface............................................................................................................73 2.2. Abstract..........................................................................................................74 2.3. Introduction....................................................................................................75 2.4. Materials and Methods...................................................................................78 2.4.1. Cells and Viruses...........................................................................78 2.4.2. Western Detection of Viral Proteins..............................................80 2.4.3. Single-cycle Infection Assays........................................................80 2.4.4. Entry Inhibitor Sensitivity..............................................................81 2.4.5. Replicative Fitness from Competition Assays...............................82 2.5. Results............................................................................................................84 2.5.1. Natural Variation at HIV-1 V3 Positions 318 and 319..................84 2.5.2. Replicative Fitness of V3 Mutant Chimeric Viruses in PBMC.....94 2.5.3. Replication of V3 Mutant Chimeric Viruses in...........................106 Macrophage Cultures 2.5.4. Antiretroviral Susceptibility Conferred by V3 Polymorphisms...108 2.5.5. Comparing Replicative Fitness with Sensitivity to.......................116 3 Entry Inhibitors 2.6. Discussion....................................................................................................119 Chapter 3. Differential Sensitivity to Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency.............128 Virus Type 1 to PSC-RANTES Involves Competitive CCR5 Binding 3.1. Preface..........................................................................................................129 3.2. Abstract........................................................................................................130 3.3. Introduction..................................................................................................131 3.4. Materials and Methods.................................................................................135 3.4.1. Reagents.......................................................................................135 3.4.2. Plasmids.......................................................................................135 3.4.3. Cells.............................................................................................135 3.4.4. Viruses and Pseudoviruses...........................................................136 3.4.5. Multiple-cycle Infection Assays..................................................137 3.4.6. Single-cycle Infection Assays......................................................138 3.4.7. Flow Cytometry...........................................................................139 3.4.8. Time-of-addition Assay...............................................................140 3.5. Results..........................................................................................................141 3.5.1. Dichotomous Sensitivity to PSC-RANTES in Multiple- and......141 Single-Cycle Assays 3.5.2. Dichotomous Multiple- and Single-Cycle Sensitivity.................145 Differences are Specific to PSC-RANTES 3.5.3. Prolonged Incubation with PSC-RANTES Recapitulates...........146 Multiple-Cycle Assays 4 3.5.4. Inhibition of HIV-1 Replication by PSC-RANTES with a..........150 Downregulation-defective Variant of CCR5 3.5.5. Multiplicity of Infection Effects on PSC-RANTES IC50 Value..153 3.5.6. Multiplicity of Infection Effects in Wild Type and M7-CCR5...160 3.5.7. Kinetics of PSC-RANTES Inhibition of Entry............................160 3.6. Discussion...................................................................................................166 Chapter 4. Intrinsic Sensitivity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1.................171 Isolates to PSC-RANTES is Mediated by Differential CCR5 Affinity 4.1. Preface..........................................................................................................172 4.2. Abstract........................................................................................................173 4.3. Introduction..................................................................................................174 4.4. Materials and Methods.................................................................................177 4.4.1. Reagents.......................................................................................177 4.4.2. Plasmids.......................................................................................177 4.4.3. Cell Lines.....................................................................................177 4.4.4. Pseudovirus Production and Single-Round Entry Assays...........178 4.4.5. Incorporation of Cleaved gp120 into Virions..............................178 4.4.6. Infection of 293 Cells with Inducible Levels of CCR5...............179 and CD4 4.4.7. Flow Cytometry...........................................................................180 4.4.8. Kinetic Entry Assay.....................................................................181 4.5. Results..........................................................................................................182 4.5.1. Neutralization of V3 Crown Mutants by sCD4...........................182 5 4.5.2. Effects of CD4 and CCR5 Expression Levels on Infectivity......185 of V3 Crown Polymorphisms 4.5.3. Infectivity Impact of Dominant Negative Hetero-.......................191 oligomerization on V3 Crown Polymorphisms 4.5.4. V3 Crown Polymorphisms Impact on Fusion Kinetics................195 4.6. Discussion...................................................................................................199 Chapter 5. General Discussion........................................................................................206
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Hsc70 As an Influenza Virus Matrix Protein (M1)
    FEBS Letters 580 (2006) 5785–5790 Identification of Hsc70 as an influenza virus matrix protein (M1) binding factor involved in the virus life cycle Ken Watanabea, Takayuki Fusea, Issay Asanoa, Fujiko Tsukaharab, Yoshiro Marub, Kyosuke Nagatac, Kaio Kitazatoa, Nobuyuki Kobayashia,* a Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Infectious Agents, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan b Department of Pharmacology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, School of Medicine, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan c Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan Received 22 August 2006; revised 13 September 2006; accepted 15 September 2006 Available online 27 September 2006 Edited by Felix Wieland nuclear export signal (NES), thus mechanism of M1-mediated Abstract Influenza virus matrix protein 1 (M1) has been shown to play a crucial role in the virus replication, assembly and bud- nuclear export of vRNP is still not well understood. ding. We identified heat shock cognate protein 70 (Hsc70) as a We herein identify heat shock cognate protein 70 (Hsc70), a M1 binding protein by immunoprecipitation and MALDI-TOF constitutive form of Hsp70 family protein, as an host factor(s) MS. The C terminal domain of M1 interacts with Hsc70. We which bind to M1 in infected cells by matrix-assisted laser found that Hsc70 does not correlate with the transport of M1 desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MAL- to the nucleus, however, it does inhibit the nuclear export of DI-TOF MS). Heat shock proteins (Hsps) were induced by M1 and NP, thus resulting in the inhibition of viral production.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Natural HIV-1 Nef Alleles and Polymorphisms on SERINC3/5 Downregulation
    Impact of natural HIV-1 Nef alleles and polymorphisms on SERINC3/5 downregulation by Steven W. Jin B.Sc., Simon Fraser University, 2016 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Master of Science Program Faculty of Health Sciences © Steven W. Jin 2019 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2019 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Steven W. Jin Degree: Master of Science Title: Impact of natural HIV-1 Nef alleles and polymorphisms on SERINC3/5 downregulation Examining Committee: Chair: Kanna Hayashi Assistant Professor Mark Brockman Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Masahiro Niikura Supervisor Associate Professor Ralph Pantophlet Supervisor Associate Professor Lisa Craig Examiner Professor Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Date Defended/Approved: April 25, 2019 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract HIV-1 Nef is a multifunctional accessory protein required for efficient viral pathogenesis. It was recently identified that the serine incorporators (SERINC) 3 and 5 are host restriction factors that decrease the infectivity of HIV-1 when incorporated into newly formed virions. However, Nef counteracts these effects by downregulating SERINC from the cell surface. Currently, there lacks a comprehensive study investigating the impact of primary Nef alleles on SERINC downregulation, as most studies to date utilize lab- adapted or reference HIV strains. In this thesis, I characterized and compared SERINC downregulation from >400 Nef alleles isolated from patients with distinct clinical outcomes and subtypes. I found that primary Nef alleles displayed a dynamic range of SERINC downregulation abilities, thus allowing naturally-occurring polymorphisms that modulate this activity to be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • MS Ritgerð Aðalbjörg Aðalbjörnsdóttir
    The Vif protein of maedi-visna virus Protein interaction and new roles Aðalbjörg Aðalbjörnsdóttir Thesis for the degree of Master of Science University of Iceland Faculty of medicine School of Health Sciences Vif prótein mæði-visnuveiru Prótein tengsl og ný hlutverk Aðalbjörg Aðalbjörnsdóttir Ritgerð til meistaragráðu í Líf og læknavísindum Umsjónarkennari: Valgerður Andrésdóttir Meistaranámsnefnd: Stefán Ragnar Jónsson og Ólafur S. Andrésson Læknadeild Heilbrigðisvísindasvið Háskóla Íslands Júní 2016 The Vif protein of maedi-visna virus Protein interaction and new roles Aðalbjörg Aðalbjörnsdóttir Thesis for the degree of Master of Science Supervisor: Valgerður Andrésdóttir Masters committee: Stefán Ragnar Jónsson and Ólafur S. Andrésson Faculty of Medicine School of Health Sciences June 2016 Ritgerð þessi er til meistaragráðu í Líf og læknavísindum og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Aðalbjörg Aðalbjörnsdóttir 2016 Prentun: Háskólaprent Reykjavík, Ísland 2016 Ágrip Mæði-visnuveira (MVV) er lentiveira af ættkvísl retróveira. Hún veldur hæggengri lungnabólgu (mæði) og heilabólgu (visnu) í kindum. Aðalmarkfrumur veirunnar eru mónocytar/makrófagar. Veiran er náskyld HIV og hefur verið notuð sem módel fyrir HIV sýkingar. Stöðug vopnakapphlaup milli veira og fruma hafa leitt af sér fjölda sértækra aðferða í vörnum hýsilsfrumu gegn veirusýkingum. Fruman hefur þróað með sér innrænar varnir gegn ýmsum sýkingum. Þessar varnir geta verið mjög sérhæfðar og tjáning þeirra spilar stórt hlutverk í hvaða frumur er hægt að sýkja og hverjar ekki. Dæmi um slíkan frumubundinn þátt eru APOBEC3 próteinin. APOBEC3 próteinin eru fjölskylda cytósín deaminasa sem geta hindrað retróveirur og retróstökkla. Þetta gera þau með því að afaminera cýtósín í úrasil í einþátta DNA á meðan á víxlritun stendur og valda þar með G-A stökkbreytingum í forveirunni.
    [Show full text]
  • 718 HIV Disorders of the Brain; Pathology and Pathogenesis Luis
    [Frontiers in Bioscience 11, 718-732, January 1, 2006] HIV disorders of the brain; pathology and pathogenesis Luis Del Valle and Sergio Piña-Oviedo Center for Neurovirology and Cancer Biology, Laboratory of Neuropathology and Molecular Pathology, Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Suite 240, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 USA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. AIDS-Encephalopathy 2.1. Definition 2.2. HIV-1 Structure 2.3. Histopathology 2.4. Clinical Manifestations 2.5. Physiopathology 3. Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy 3.1. Definition 3.2. JC Virus Biological Considerations 3.3. JC Virus Structure 3.4. Histopathology 3.5. Clinical Manifestations 3.6. Physiopathology 4. Cryptococcosis 5.1. Definition 5.2. Cryptococcus neoformans Structure 5.3. Histopathology 5.4. Clinical Manifestations 5.5. Physiopathology 5. Toxoplasmosis 5.1. Definition 5.2. Toxoplasma godii Structure 5.3. Histopathology 5.4. Clinical Manifestations 5.5. Physiopathology 6. Primary CNS Lymphomas 6.1. Definition 6.2. Histopathology 6.3. Clinical Manifestations 6.4. Physiopathology 7. Acknowledgments 8. References 1. ABSTRACT Infection with HIV-1 has spread exponentially in still present in approximately 70 to 90% of patients and recent years to reach alarming proportions. It is estimated can be the result of HIV itself or of opportunistic than more than 33 million adults and 1.3 million children infections. Here we briefly review the pathology and are infected worldwide. Approximately 16,000 new cases pathophysiology of AIDS-Encephalopathy, of some of are diagnosed every day and almost 3 million people die the significant opportunistic infections affecting the every year from AIDS, making it the fourth leading brain in the context of AIDS, including Progressive cause of death in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Merced UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal
    UC Merced UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal Title Antiviral Drugs Targeting Host Proteins an Efficient Strategy Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/66f5b4m0 Journal UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal, 9(2) Author Karmonphet, Arrada Publication Date 2017 DOI 10.5070/M492034789 Undergraduate eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Antiviral Drugs Targeting Host Proteins an Efficient Strategy Arrada Karmonphet University of California, Merced Keywords: Proteins, Viruses, Drugs 1 Abstract Viruses have the ability to spread rapidly because the proteins and enzymes from the host cell help in the development of viruses. Although there are many vaccines that can prevent some viruses from infecting the body, the antiviral drugs today have not been effective in combating viruses from the start of spreading. This is due to the fact that the processes inside a virus are still being studied. However, host proteins proved to be valuable factors responsible for viral replication and spreading. It was found that certain functions such as capsid formation of the virus utilized a biochemical pathway that involved host proteins and some proteins of the host cell were evolutionarily conserved. When the important host proteins were altered, or removed the viruses weren’t able to replicate as effectively. It was concluded that targeting the host proteins had a significant effect in viral replication. This approach can stop viral replication from the start, create less viral resistance, and help find new antiviral drugs that work for many different types of viruses. This review will analyze five research articles about protein interactions in viruses and how monitoring the proteins and biochemical pathways can lead to the discovery of druggable targets during development.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinct Contributions of Different Domains Within the HIV-1 Gag
    viruses Article Distinct Contributions of Different Domains within the HIV-1 Gag Polyprotein to Specific and Nonspecific Interactions with RNA Tomas Kroupa , Siddhartha A. K. Datta and Alan Rein * HIV Dynamics and Replication Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA; [email protected] (T.K.); [email protected] (S.A.K.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 February 2020; Accepted: 31 March 2020; Published: 2 April 2020 Abstract: Viral genomic RNA is packaged into virions with high specificity and selectivity. However, in vitro the Gag specificity towards viral RNA is obscured when measured in buffers containing physiological salt. Interestingly, when the binding is challenged by increased salt concentration, the addition of competing RNAs, or introducing mutations to Gag protein, the specificity towards viral RNA becomes detectable. The objective of this work was to examine the contributions of the individual HIV-1 Gag polyprotein domains to nonspecific and specific RNA binding and stability of the initial protein-RNA complexes. Using a panel of Gag proteins with mutations disabling different Gag-Gag or Gag-RNA interfaces, we investigated the distinct contributions of individual domains which distinguish the binding to viral and nonviral RNA by measuring the binding of the proteins to RNAs. We measured the binding affinity in near-physiological salt concentration, and then challenged the binding by increasing the ionic strength to suppress the electrostatic interactions and reveal the contribution of specific Gag–RNA and Gag–Gag interactions. Surprisingly, we observed that Gag dimerization and the highly basic region in the matrix domain contribute significantly to the specificity of viral RNA binding.
    [Show full text]
  • How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways During Uncoating
    cells Review How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during Uncoating Etori Aguiar Moreira 1 , Yohei Yamauchi 2 and Patrick Matthias 1,3,* 1 Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Influenza is a zoonotic respiratory disease of major public health interest due to its pan- demic potential, and a threat to animals and the human population. The influenza A virus genome consists of eight single-stranded RNA segments sequestered within a protein capsid and a lipid bilayer envelope. During host cell entry, cellular cues contribute to viral conformational changes that promote critical events such as fusion with late endosomes, capsid uncoating and viral genome release into the cytosol. In this focused review, we concisely describe the virus infection cycle and highlight the recent findings of host cell pathways and cytosolic proteins that assist influenza uncoating during host cell entry. Keywords: influenza; capsid uncoating; HDAC6; ubiquitin; EPS8; TNPO1; pandemic; M1; virus– host interaction Citation: Moreira, E.A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Matthias, P. How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during 1. Introduction Uncoating. Cells 2021, 10, 1722. Viruses are microscopic parasites that, unable to self-replicate, subvert a host cell https://doi.org/10.3390/ for their replication and propagation. Despite their apparent simplicity, they can cause cells10071722 severe diseases and even pose pandemic threats [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • Autophagy and Mammalian Viruses: Roles in Immune Response, Viral Replication, and Beyond
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2016 Autophagy and mammalian viruses: roles in immune response, viral replication, and beyond Paul, P ; Münz, C Abstract: Autophagy is an important cellular catabolic process conserved from yeast to man. Double- membrane vesicles deliver their cargo to the lysosome for degradation. Hence, autophagy is one of the key mechanisms mammalian cells deploy to rid themselves of intracellular pathogens including viruses. How- ever, autophagy serves many more functions during viral infection. First, it regulates the immune response through selective degradation of immune components, thus preventing possibly harmful overactivation and inflammation. Additionally, it delivers virus-derived antigens to antigen-loading compartments for presentation to T lymphocytes. Second, it might take an active part in the viral life cycle by, eg, facili- tating its release from cells. Lastly, in the constant arms race between host and virus, autophagy is often hijacked by viruses and manipulated to their own advantage. In this review, we will highlight key steps during viral infection in which autophagy plays a role. We have selected some exemplary viruses and will describe the molecular mechanisms behind their intricate relationship with the autophagic machinery, a result of host–pathogen coevolution. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aivir.2016.02.002 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-131236 Book Section Accepted Version The following work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.
    [Show full text]
  • Replication of HIV-1 Envelope Protein Cytoplasmic Domain Variants in Permissive and Restrictive Cells T
    Virology 538 (2019) 1–10 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Virology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/virology Replication of HIV-1 envelope protein cytoplasmic domain variants in permissive and restrictive cells T ∗ August O. Staubus, Ayna Alfadhli, Robin Lid Barklis, Eric Barklis Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Wild type (WT) HIV-1 envelope (Env) protein cytoplasmic tails (CTs) appear to be composed of membrane- HIV-1 proximal, N-terminal unstructured regions, and three C-terminal amphipathic helices. Previous studies have Replication shown that WT and CT-deleted (ΔCT) Env proteins are incorporated into virus particles via different mechan- Envelope protein isms. WT Env proteins traffic to cell plasma membranes (PMs), are rapidly internalized, recycle to PMs, and are Cytoplasmic tail incorporated into virions in permissive and restrictive cells in a Gag matrix (MA) protein-dependent fashion. In contrast, previously described ΔCT proteins do not appear to be internalized after their arrival to PMs, and do not require MA, but are only incorporated into virions in permissive cell lines. We have analyzed a new set of HIV-1 CT variants with respect to their replication in permissive and restrictive cells. Our results provide novel details as to how CT elements regulate HIV-1 Env protein function. 1. Introduction et al., 2018; Ohno et al., 1997; Wyss et al., 2001). Internalized Env proteins either are shunted off to lysosomes for degradation, or return The pathways by which HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins become in- to PMs on recycling endosomes in a pathway that is dependent, in corporated into virions are complicated and incompletely elucidated certain cell types, on the Rab11 coupling protein FIP1C (Qi et al., 2013, (Checkley et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Reverse Transcriptase and APOBEC3G in Survival of Human
    & My gy co lo lo ro g i y V Soni et al., Virol Mycol 2013, 3:1 Virology & Mycology DOI: 10.4172/2161-0517.1000125 ISSN: 2161-0517 Review Article Open Access Role of Reverse Transcriptase and APOBEC3G in Survival of Human Immune Deficiency Virus -1 Genome Raj Kumar Soni*, Amol Kanampalliwar and Archana Tiwari School of Biotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya (State Technological University), Madhya Pradesh, India Abstract Development of an effective vaccine against HIV-1 is a major challenge for scientists at present. Rapid mutation and replication of the virus in patients contribute to the evolution of the virus, which makes it unconquerable. Hence a deep understanding of critical elements related to HIV-1 is necessary. Errors introduced during DNA synthesis by reverse transcriptase are the primary source of genetic variation within retroviral populations. Numerous current studies have shown that apolipo protein B mRNA-editing enzyme-catalytic polypeptide-like 3G (APOBEC3G) proteins mediated sub- lethal mutagenesis of HIV-1 proviral DNA contributes in viral fitness by accelerating human immunodeficiency virus-1 evolution. This results in the loss of the immunity and development of resistance against anti-viral drugs. This review focuses on the latest biological, biochemical, and structural studies in an attempt to discuss current ideas related to mutations initiated by reverse transcriptase and APOBEC3G. It also describes their effect on immunological diversity and retroviral restriction, and their overall effect on the viral genome respectively. A new procedure for eradication of HIV-1 has also been proposed based on the previous studies and proven facts. Keywords: HIV-1; Reverse transcriptase; Recombination; defined.
    [Show full text]
  • To Reduce HIV-1 Infectivity Facilitates Its Encapsidation Into the Virions GANP Interacts with APOBEC3G
    GANP Interacts with APOBEC3G and Facilitates Its Encapsidation into the Virions To Reduce HIV-1 Infectivity This information is current as Kazuhiko Maeda, Sarah Ameen Almofty, Shailendra Kumar of September 23, 2021. Singh, Mohammed Mansour Abbas Eid, Mayuko Shimoda, Terumasa Ikeda, Atsushi Koito, Phuong Pham, Myron F. Goodman and Nobuo Sakaguchi J Immunol 2013; 191:6030-6039; Prepublished online 6 November 2013; Downloaded from doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302057 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/12/6030 Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/11/06/jimmunol.130205 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Material 7.DC1 References This article cites 52 articles, 20 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/12/6030.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. by guest on September 23, 2021 • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology GANP Interacts with APOBEC3G and Facilitates Its Encapsidation into the Virions To Reduce HIV-1 Infectivity Kazuhiko Maeda,*,1 Sarah Ameen Almofty,*,1 Shailendra Kumar Singh,* Mohammed Mansour Abbas Eid,* Mayuko Shimoda,* Terumasa Ikeda,†,2 Atsushi Koito,† Phuong Pham,‡ Myron F.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphorylation of the M2 Protein of Influenza a Virus Is Not Essential for Virus Viability
    VIROLOGY 252, 54±64 (1998) ARTICLE NO. VY989384 Phosphorylation of the M2 Protein of Influenza A Virus Is Not Essential for Virus Viability Joanne M. Thomas, Mark P. Stevens, Neil Percy,1 and Wendy S. Barclay2 School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, UK RG6 6AJ Received May 14, 1998; returned to author for revision June 12, 1998; accepted August 18, 1998 M2 is a minor component of the influenza A virus envelope. The cytoplasmic tail of the M2 protein is posttranslationally modified in the infected cell by palmitylation and phosphorylation. The primary site for phosphorylation of the M2 cytoplasmic tail is serine 64, which is highly conserved yet not required for the activity of the M2 ion channel. Using an exogenous incorporation assay, we have shown that incorporation of M2 into virus particles is type-specific and does not require phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tail. In addition, phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tail is not required for the directional transport of M2 in polarized MDCK cells. Using a reverse genetics and reassortment procedure, we generated a virus (Ra) specifically mutated in segment 7 such that the M2 cytoplasmic tail could no longer be phosphorylated. The virus was found to grow as well as wild-type virus in tissue culture and in eggs, was stable on passage in these systems, and possessed no second-site mutations in the engineered RNA segment. In vivo Ra replicated in Balb/c mice at least as well as the parent strain A/WSN/33. These studies indicate that phosphorylation of the M2 cytoplasmic tail is not required for in vitro or in vivo replication of influenza A virus.
    [Show full text]