DOCSLIB.ORG

For Peer Review 22 • Table S1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Peer Review 22 • Table S1 Journal of Biogeography Page 22 of 2260 1 2 3 4 5 Supporting Information 6 7 8 9 Testing species assemblage predictions from stacked and 10 11 joint species distribution models 12 13 14 Damaris Zurell, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Helge Gross, Andri Baltensweiler, Thomas Sattler, 15 16 Rafael O. Wüest 17 18 19 20 This supporting information contains the following items: 21 For Peer Review 22 • Table S1. Forest bird species included in analyses. 23 • Table S2. Tree and shrub species included in the analyses. 24 • Fig. S1. Distribution of bird and tree prevalence levels. 25 26 • Fig. S2. Spatial blocks used in 5-fold spatial block cross-validation. 27 • Fig. S3. Predictor variables for forest bird and tree species analyses. 28 • Fig. S4. Single species model performance. 29 30 • Fig. S5. Spatial autocorrelation in model residuals. 31 • Fig. S6. Prevalence of species with higher JSDM or SDM performance. 32 • Fig. S7. Assemblage sensitivity and specificity. 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 23 of 2260 Journal of Biogeography 1 2 3 Supplementary Tables 4 5 6 7 Table S1. Forest bird species included in the analyses. For each species, we list the predictive performance achieved in the single-species ensemble SDMs and JSDMs (cf. Fig. S3). 8 9 JSDM SDM 10 11 Latin Name English Name AUC Sens Spec TSS AUC Sens Spec TSS 12 Accipiter gentilis Northern 13 Goshawk 0.61 0.83 0.34 0.17 0.85 0.81 0.75 0.56 14 Accipiter nisus Eurasian 15 Sparrowhawk 0.56 0.79 0.32 0.10 0.85 0.85 0.75 0.59 16 Aegithalos Long-tailed 17 caudatus Bushtit 0.67 0.89 0.37 0.27 0.83 0.80 0.72 0.52 18 Anthus trivialis Tree Pipit 19 0.83 0.79 0.77 0.56 0.90 0.88 0.78 0.66 20 Asio otus Long-eared Owl 0.54 0.46 0.71 0.17 0.94 0.91 0.90 0.80 21 Bonasa bonasia Hazel GrouseFor Peer0.60 0.12Review0.95 0.07 0.94 1.00 0.79 0.79 22 Buteo buteo Common 23 Buzzard 0.85 0.77 0.77 0.54 0.90 0.78 0.84 0.62 24 25 Carduelis spinus Eurasian Siskin 0.83 0.89 0.67 0.56 0.89 0.94 0.70 0.64 26 Certhia Short-toed 27 brachydactyla Treecreeper 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.62 0.92 0.88 0.81 0.68 28 Certhia Eurasian 29 familiaris Treecreeper 0.74 0.61 0.73 0.34 0.83 0.74 0.75 0.48 30 Coccothraustes Hawfinch 31 coccothraustes 0.76 0.87 0.54 0.41 0.86 0.77 0.78 0.54 32 Columba oenas Stock Dove 33 0.75 0.93 0.53 0.46 0.88 0.93 0.71 0.64 34 Columba Common Wood 35 palumbus Pigeon 0.89 0.83 0.80 0.63 0.92 0.87 0.81 0.68 36 Corvus corax Northern Raven 0.58 0.60 0.52 0.12 0.79 0.82 0.62 0.44 37 Corvus corone Carrion Crow 38 corone 0.82 0.68 0.83 0.51 0.89 0.79 0.86 0.65 39 Cuculus canorus Common Cuckoo 40 0.63 0.49 0.74 0.24 0.78 0.77 0.65 0.41 41 Dendrocopos Great Spotted 42 major Woodpecker 0.81 0.73 0.75 0.48 0.87 0.74 0.84 0.58 43 Dendrocopos Lesser Spotted 44 minor Woodpecker 0.83 0.85 0.64 0.49 0.90 0.95 0.71 0.67 45 Dryocopus Black 46 martius Woodpecker 0.72 0.91 0.43 0.34 0.83 0.88 0.62 0.50 47 Emberiza Yellowhammer 48 citrinella 0.82 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.89 0.85 0.76 0.61 49 Falco subbuteo Eurasian Hobby 50 0.78 0.92 0.54 0.46 0.90 0.91 0.74 0.65 51 Ficedula European Pied 52 hypoleuca Flycatcher 0.75 0.90 0.55 0.45 0.85 0.88 0.67 0.55 53 Garrulus Eurasian Jay 54 glandarius 0.81 0.80 0.67 0.48 0.90 0.76 0.85 0.60 55 Hippolais Icterine warbler 56 icterina 0.75 0.50 0.88 0.38 0.95 0.98 0.85 0.83 57 Lanius collurio Red-backed 58 Shrike 0.66 0.91 0.34 0.25 0.84 0.73 0.79 0.52 59 Loxia Red Crossbill 60 curvirostra 0.79 0.74 0.73 0.47 0.86 0.87 0.70 0.57 Journal of Biogeography Page 24 of 2260 1 2 3 Luscinia Common 4 megarhynchos Nightingale 0.91 0.78 0.85 0.63 0.95 0.98 0.83 0.82 5 Milvus migrans Black Kite 6 0.79 0.81 0.64 0.45 0.86 0.92 0.64 0.56 7 Muscicapa Spotted 8 striata Flycatcher 0.79 0.86 0.63 0.49 0.86 0.89 0.65 0.55 9 Nucifraga Spotted 10 caryocatactes Nutcracker 0.88 0.91 0.74 0.65 0.92 0.90 0.80 0.70 11 Oriolus oriolus Eurasian Golden 12 Oriole 0.90 0.88 0.79 0.67 0.93 0.97 0.79 0.76 13 Parus caeruleus Blue Tit 0.92 0.90 0.83 0.73 0.96 0.91 0.85 0.75 14 15 Parus cristatus European 16 Crested Tit 0.81 0.81 0.65 0.46 0.88 0.79 0.79 0.58 17 Parus montanus Willow Tit 0.86 0.83 0.82 0.65 0.91 0.85 0.83 0.69 18 Parus palustris Marsh Tit 0.82 0.80 0.74 0.54 0.89 0.84 0.75 0.59 19 Pernis apivorus European Honey 20 Buzzard 0.58 0.90 0.25 0.15 0.87 0.95 0.69 0.64 21 Phoenicurus CommonFor Peer Review 22 23 phoenicurus Redstart 0.61 0.77 0.43 0.20 0.81 0.76 0.72 0.49 24 Phylloscopus Western Bonellis 25 bonelli Warbler 0.68 0.55 0.75 0.30 0.86 0.85 0.70 0.55 26 Phylloscopus Wood Warbler 27 sibilatrix 0.74 0.79 0.63 0.41 0.85 0.80 0.74 0.54 28 Phylloscopus Willow Warbler 29 trochilus 0.69 0.87 0.49 0.36 0.84 0.81 0.72 0.53 30 Picus canus Grey-headed 31 Woodpecker 0.80 0.79 0.70 0.49 0.90 0.92 0.79 0.71 32 Picus viridis European Green 33 34 Woodpecker 0.67 0.71 0.54 0.26 0.81 0.72 0.74 0.46 35 Prunella Dunnock 36 modularis 0.77 0.64 0.77 0.41 0.86 0.75 0.80 0.55 37 Pyrrhula Eurasian 38 pyrrhula Bullfinch 0.79 0.74 0.69 0.43 0.87 0.72 0.83 0.55 39 Regulus Firecrest 40 ignicapillus 0.83 0.76 0.78 0.54 0.89 0.82 0.79 0.62 41 Regulus regulus Goldcrest 0.80 0.85 0.64 0.49 0.88 0.78 0.80 0.58 42 Serinus Citril Finch 43 44 citrinella 0.88 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.92 0.99 0.73 0.73 45 Sitta europaea Eurasian 46 Nuthatch 0.84 0.77 0.78 0.55 0.90 0.80 0.81 0.61 47 Streptopelia European Turtle 48 turtur Dove 0.85 0.80 0.78 0.57 0.93 0.99 0.80 0.79 49 Strix aluco Tawny Owl 0.60 0.71 0.46 0.16 0.86 0.89 0.70 0.59 50 Sylvia borin Garden Warbler 51 0.69 0.56 0.73 0.29 0.81 0.72 0.76 0.48 52 Sylvia curruca Lesser 53 Whitethroat 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.60 0.91 0.89 0.78 0.67 54 Tetrao tetrix Black Grouse 0.94 0.97 0.80 0.78 0.96 0.96 0.88 0.83 55 Turdus pilaris Fieldfare 0.65 0.81 0.45 0.26 0.81 0.65 0.82 0.47 56 Turdus Ring Ouzel 57 torquatus 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.82 0.96 0.99 0.85 0.84 58 59 Turdus Mistle Thrush 60 viscivorus 0.79 0.77 0.70 0.47 0.87 0.79 0.77 0.56 Page 25 of 2260 Journal of Biogeography 1 2 3 4 5 Table S2. Tree and shrub species included in the analyses. For each species, we list the predictive 6 performance achieved in the single-species ensemble SDMs and JSDMs (cf. Fig. S3). 7 8 JSDM SDM 9 Latin Name English Name AUC Sens Spec TSS AUC Sens Spec TSS 10 Abies alba Silver Fir 11 0.82 0.79 0.71 0.50 0.88 0.86 0.72 0.58 12 Acer campestris Hedge Maple 0.82 0.76 0.74 0.50 0.92 0.99 0.74 0.73 13 Acer opalus Italian Maple 0.67 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 0.93 14 Acer platanoides Norway Maple 15 0.74 0.88 0.55 0.43 0.93 0.95 0.82 0.77 16 Acer Sycamore 17 pseudoplatanus Maple 0.75 0.80 0.60 0.39 0.85 0.72 0.79 0.51 18 Alnus glutinosa Black Alder 0.82 0.84 0.68 0.53 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.92 19 Alnus incana European Alder 0.68 0.76 0.51 0.27 0.90 0.93 0.70 0.64 20 Alnus viridis Green Alder 21 For Peer0.90 0.80Review0.83 0.63 0.94 0.98 0.78 0.76 22 Berberis vulgaris Barberry 0.81 0.64 0.87 0.51 0.97 0.99 0.90 0.89 23 Betula pendula Weeping Birch 0.74 0.79 0.57 0.36 0.87 0.89 0.68 0.57 24 Carpinus betulus Hornbeam 0.89 0.94 0.76 0.70 0.95 0.96 0.86 0.83 25 26 Castanea sativa Sweet Chestnut 0.89 0.71 0.92 0.63 0.99 0.99 0.94 0.93 27 Clematis vitalba Old Mans 28 Beard 0.82 0.79 0.73 0.52 0.93 0.98 0.81 0.78 29 Cornus sanguinea Red Dogwood 0.82 0.61 0.80 0.40 0.92 0.96 0.74 0.70 30 Corylus avellana Hazel 31 0.74 0.82 0.57 0.39 0.84 0.78 0.73 0.51 32 Crataegus Common 33 monogyna Hawthorn 0.76 0.75 0.66 0.41 0.92 0.90 0.79 0.68 34 Crataegus English 35 oxyacanta Hawthorn 0.81 0.85 0.65 0.50 0.94 0.98 0.77 0.75 36 Daphne Paradise Plant 37 mezereum 0.54 0.47 0.60 0.07 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.84 38 Euonymus European 39 europaeus Spindle Tree 0.86 0.65 0.84 0.48 0.95 0.98 0.82 0.80 40 Fagus sylvatica Beech 41 0.92 0.87 0.83 0.70 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.74 42 Fraxinus excelsior Ash 0.82 0.82 0.72 0.54 0.89 0.88 0.71 0.59 43 Hedera helix English Ivy 0.85 0.91 0.67 0.58 0.91 0.89 0.80 0.69 44 Ilex aquifolium English Holly 0.82 0.91 0.61 0.53 0.95 0.94 0.85 0.79 45 46 Juglans regia Walnut 0.81 0.92 0.63 0.55 0.95 0.97 0.88 0.85 47 Juniperus Common 48 communis Juniper 0.82 0.68 0.76 0.44 0.95 0.96 0.86 0.82 49 Juniperus Common 50 communis ssp Juniper (Ssp 51 alpina Alpina) 0.87 0.75 0.85 0.59 0.96 0.97 0.88 0.86 52 Larix decidua European 53 Larch 0.79 0.67 0.78 0.45 0.88 0.77 0.81 0.58 54 55 Ligustrum vulgare Common Privet 0.82 0.37 0.88 0.25 0.92 0.96 0.76 0.72 56 Lonicera alpigena Alpine 57 Honeysuckle 0.67 0.74 0.50 0.24 0.94 0.95 0.82 0.77 58 Lonicera caerulea Blue 59 Honeysuckle 0.60 0.18 0.87 0.05 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.95 60 Lonicera nigra Black Honeysuckle 0.66 0.74 0.52 0.26 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.78 Journal of Biogeography Page 26 of 2260 1 2 3 Lonicera European Fly 4 xylosteum Honeysuckle 0.71 0.84 0.51 0.35 0.85 0.74 0.77 0.51 5 Picea abies Norway Spruce 6 0.75 0.74 0.64 0.38 0.88 0.73 0.88 0.61 7 Pinus cembra Swiss Stone 8 Pine 0.95 0.89 0.90 0.79 0.98 0.99 0.91 0.90 9 Pinus mugo Mountain Pine 10 arborea (Var Arborea) 0.86 0.04 0.99 0.03 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.91 11 Pinus mugo Mountain Pine 12 prostrata (Var Prostrata) 0.91 0.68 0.89 0.57 0.98 1.00 0.94 0.94 13 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 0.73 0.83 0.54 0.36 0.88 0.86 0.75 0.62 14 15 Populus tremula Aspen 0.70 0.52 0.75 0.28 0.94 0.94 0.86 0.80 16 Prunus avium Sweet Cherry 0.80 0.84 0.64 0.48 0.88 0.88 0.71 0.59 17 Prunus padus European Bird 18 Cherry 0.79 0.62 0.85 0.46 0.97 0.98 0.91 0.88 19 Prunus spinosa Blackthorn 0.78 0.25 0.91 0.16 0.95 0.97 0.84 0.81 20 21 Pseudotsuga DouglasFor Fir Peer Review 22 menziesii 0.85 0.81 0.77 0.58 0.98 0.99 0.93 0.92 23 Quercus petraea Eych 0.85 0.92 0.65 0.57 0.92 0.97 0.77 0.74 24 Quercus Downy Oak 25 pubescens 0.84 0.45 0.96 0.41 0.99 1.00
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • Larix Decidua Miller Taxonomy Author, Year Miller Synonym Larix Europaea DC; Larix Sudetica Domin; Pinus Larix L
    Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group Tree factsheet images at pages 3 and 4 Larix decidua Miller taxonomy author, year Miller synonym Larix europaea DC; Larix sudetica Domin; Pinus larix L. Family Pinaceae Eng. Name European larch, Common larch Dutch name Europese lariks (Boom, 2000) Europese lork (Heukels’ Flora, 2005) subspecies - varieties L. decidua var. polonica (Racib) Ostenf. & Syrach Larsen (syn. L. polonica Racib.) L. decidua var. carpatica Domin (syn. L. carpatica Domin.) hybrids Larix x marschlinsii Coaz (L. decidua x L. kaempferi) (syn. Larix x eurolepis Henry) cultivars, frequently planted - references Earle, C.J. Gymnosperm database www.conifers.org USDA Forest Service www.pfaf.org/database/index.php Westra, J.J. Het geslacht Larix. In Schmidt (ed.). 1987. Ned. Boomsoorten 1 Syllabus vakgroep Bosteelt en Bosecologie, Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen Plants for a Future Database; www.pfaf.org/index.html morphology crown habit tree, pyramidal max. height (m) Europe: 30-50 The Netherlands: 30 max. dbh (cm) 100-200 oldest tree year 988 AC, tree ring count, Val Malenco, Italy. actual size Europe year …, d(130) 95, h 46, Glenlee Park, Dumfries and Galloway, UK. year …, d(130) 271, h 30, Ulten Valley, Saint Nicholas, Italy. actual size Netherlands year 1844, d…, h …, Schovenhorst, Putten year 1830-1840, d(130) 114, h 17 year 1850-1860, d(130) 115, h 20 year 1860-1870, d(130) 97, h 28 leaf length (cm) 2-4 single leaf petiole (cm) 0 leaf colour upper surface green leaf colour under surface green leaves arrangement alternate flowering March - May flowering plant monoecious flower monosexual flower diameter (cm) ? pollination wind fruit; length cone; 3-4 cm fruit petiole (cm) 0,3 seed; length samara (=winged nut); … cm seed-wing length (cm) weight 1000 seeds (g) 5,0-5,9 seeds ripen October same year seed dispersal wind habitat natural distribution Alps, Central Europe in N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Management of Larix Forests: a Look Ahead Proceedings of an International Symposium
    Ecology and Management of Larix Forests: A Look Ahead Proceedings of an International Symposium Whitefish, Montana, U.S.A. October 5-9, 1992 Compilers: Wyman C. Schmidt Kathy J. McDonald Duchesne, L. C.; Lelu, M. A; von Aderkas, P.; Charest, Klimaszewska, K 1989. Plantlet development from imma­ P. J. 1992. Microprojectile-mediated DNA delivery in ture zygotic embryos of hybrid larch through somatic haploid and diploid embryogenic cells of Larix spp. embryogenesis. Plant Science. 63: 95-103. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. [In press]. Klimaszewska, K; Ward, C.; Cheliak, W. M. 1992. Cryo­ Ellis, D. D.; McCabe, D.; McInnis, S.; Martinell, B.; preservation and plant regeneration from embryogenic Roberts, D.; McCown, B. 1991. Transformation of white cultures oflarch (Larix x eurolepis) and black spruce spruce by electrical discharge particle acceleration. In: (Picea mariana). Journal of Expermental Botany. 43: Haissing, B. E.; Kirk, T. K; Olsen, W. L.; Raffa, K F.; 73-79. Slavicek, J. M., eds. Applications of biotechnology-to Lelu, M. A; Klimaszewska, K K; Jones, C.; Ward, C.; tree culture, protection and utilization. United States von Aderkas, P.; Charest, P. J. 1992. A laboratory guide Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Columbus, to somatic embryogenesis in spruce and larch. Petawawa OH:I02. National Forestry Institute. Information Report. Huang, Y.; Diner, AM.; Karnosky, D. F. 1991. Agrobacter­ PI-X-Ul (submitted for publication). ium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation and von Aderkas, P.; Klimaszewska, K K; Bonga, J . M. 1990. regeneration of a conifer: oorix decidua. In: Vitro Cell. Diploid and haploid embryogenesis in Larix leptolepis, Dev. BioI. 27P: 201-207.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Editorial Staff: Rachel Cobb, David Pfaff, Patricia Riley Hammer, Henri Nier, Suzanne Pierot, Sabina Sulgrove, Russell Windle
    Spring 2010 Volume 36 IVY J OURNAL IVY OF THE YEAR 2011 Hedera helix ‘Ivalace’ General Information Press Information American Ivy Society [email protected] P. O. Box 163 Deerfield, NJ 08313 Ivy Identification, Registration Membership Russell A. Windle The American Ivy Society Membership American Ivy Society Laurie Perper P.O. Box 461 512 Waterford Road Lionville, PA 19353-0461 Silver Spring, MD, 20901 [email protected] Officers and Directors President—Suzanne Warner Pierot Treasurer—Susan Hendley Membership—Laurie Perper Registrar, Ivy Research Center Director—Russell Windle Taxonomist—Dr. Sabina Mueller Sulgrove Rosa Capps, Rachel Cobb, Susan Cummings, Barbara Furlong, Patricia Riley Hammer, Constance L. Meck, Dorothy Rouse, Daphne Pfaff, Pearl Wong Ivy Journal Editorial Staff: Rachel Cobb, David Pfaff, Patricia Riley Hammer, Henri Nier, Suzanne Pierot, Sabina Sulgrove, Russell Windle The Ivy Journal is published once per year by the American Ivy Society, a nonprofit educational organization. Membership includes a new ivy plant each year, subscription to the Ivy Journal and Between the Vines, the newsletter of The American Ivy Society. Editorial submissions are welcome. Mail typed, double-spaced manuscript to the Ivy Journal Editor, The American Ivy Society. Enclose a self-addressed, stamped envelope if you wish manuscript and/ or artwork to be returned. Manuscripts will be handled with reasonable care. However, AIS assumes no responsibility for safety of artwork, photographs, or manuscripts. Every precaution is taken to ensure accuracy but AIS cannot accept responsibility for the corrections or accuracy of the information supplied herein or for any opinion expressed. The American Ivy Society P. O. Box 163, Deerfield Street, NJ 08313 www.ivy.org Remember to send AIS your new address.
    [Show full text]
  • PACKAGE LEAFLET Package Leaflet: Information for the Patient
    PACKAGE LEAFLET Package leaflet: Information for the patient Pulmocap Hedera, stroop Dry extract of ivy leaf Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start taking this medicine because it contains important information for you. Always take this medicine exactly as described in this leaflet or as your doctor or pharmacist have told you. - Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. - Ask your pharmacist if you need more information or advice. - If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor or pharmacist. This includes any possible side effects not listed in this leaflet. See section 4. - You must talk to a doctor if you do not feel better or if you feel worse after 5 days. What is in this leaflet 1. What Pulmocap Hedera is and what it is used for 2. What you need to know before you take Pulmocap Hedera 3. How to take Pulmocap Hedera 4. Possible side effects 5. How to store Pulmocap Hedera 6. Contents of the pack and other information 1. What Pulmocap Hedera is and what it is used for Pulmocap Hedera is a herbal medicinal product used as an expectorant in case of productive cough. It contains the dry extract of ivy leaf (Hedera helix L., folium). Pulmocap Hedera is indicated in adults, adolescents and children older than 2 years. You must talk to a doctor if you do not feel better or if you feel worse after 5 days. 2. What you need to know before you take Pulmocap Hedera Do not use this medicine: - if you are allergic to ivy, other members of the Araliaceae family or any other ingredients of this medicine (listed in section 6).
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to Identify the Level of Threat to Plants
    Ex-Situ Conservation at Scott Arboretum Public gardens and arboreta are more than just pretty places. They serve as an insurance policy for the future through their well managed ex situ collections. Ex situ conservation focuses on safeguarding species by keeping them in places such as seed banks or living collections. In situ means "on site", so in situ conservation is the conservation of species diversity within normal and natural habitats and ecosystems. The Scott Arboretum is a member of Botanical Gardens Conservation International (BGCI), which works with botanic gardens around the world and other conservation partners to secure plant diversity for the benefit of people and the planet. The aim of BGCI is to ensure that threatened species are secure in botanic garden collections as an insurance policy against loss in the wild. Their work encompasses supporting botanic garden development where this is needed and addressing capacity building needs. They support ex situ conservation for priority species, with a focus on linking ex situ conservation with species conservation in natural habitats and they work with botanic gardens on the development and implementation of habitat restoration and education projects. BGCI uses the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ to identify the level of threat to plants. In-depth analyses of the data contained in the IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List are published periodically (usually at least once every four years). The results from the analysis of the data contained in the 2008 update of the IUCN Red List are published in The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; see www.iucn.org/redlist for further details.
    [Show full text]
  • Proper Listing of Scientific and Common Plant Names In
    PROPER USAGE OF PLANT NAMES IN PUBLICATIONS A Guide for Writers and Editors Kathy Musial, Huntington Botanical Gardens, August 2017 Scientific names (also known as “Latin names”, “botanical names”) A unit of biological classification is called a “taxon” (plural, “taxa”). This is defined as a taxonomic group of any rank, e.g. genus, species, subspecies, variety. To allow scientists and others to clearly communicate with each other, taxa have names consisting of Latin words. These words may be derived from languages other than Latin, in which case they are referred to as “latinized”. A species name consists of two words: the genus name followed by a second name (called the specific epithet) unique to that species; e.g. Hedera helix. Once the name has been mentioned in text, the genus name may be abbreviated in any immediately subsequent listings of the same species, or other species of the same genus, e.g. Hedera helix, H. canariensis. The first letter of the genus name is always upper case and the first letter of the specific epithet is always lower case. Latin genus and species names should always be italicized when they appear in text that is in roman type; conversely, these Latin names should be in roman type when they appear in italicized text. Names of suprageneric taxa (above the genus level, e.g. families, Asteraceae, etc.), are never italicized when they appear in roman text. The first letter of these names is always upper case. Subspecific taxa (subspecies, variety, forma) have a third epithet that is always separated from the specific epithet by the rank designation “var.”, “ssp.” or “subsp.”, or “forma” (sometimes abbreviated as “f.”); e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • About Eating and Not Eaten. Vigilance and Foraging Strategies in Wintering Eurasian Siskins (Carduelis Spinus)
    About eating and not eaten. Vigilance and foraging strategies in wintering Eurasian siskins (Carduelis spinus) Sobre menjar i no ser menjar: estratègies de vigilància i alimentació en lluers hivernants (Carduelis spinus) Jordi Pascual Sala ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tdx.cat) i a través del Dipòsit Digital de la UB (diposit.ub.edu) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX ni al Dipòsit Digital de la UB. No s’autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX o al Dipòsit Digital de la UB (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tdx.cat) y a través del Repositorio Digital de la UB (diposit.ub.edu) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR o al Repositorio Digital de la UB.
    [Show full text]
  • Prolonged Sperm Storage Duration in Domesticated Canaries
    770 ShortCommunications [Auk,Vol. 104 ProlongedSperm StorageDuration in DomesticatedCanaries T. R. BIRKHEAD ZoologyDepartment, The University, Sheffield S10 2TN, UnitedKingdom Relative to most mammals, female birds can retain weekspreviously. The other 8 birdsin the aviary were their fertility for a considerabletime after mating and subsequentlypaired and confirmed to be females.Es- separationfrom the male (Lake 1975).Maximum sperm timated sperm storageduration was 35 days. storagedurations range from about 6 days in Ringed (4) A female canarywas paired to a male European Turtle-Doves (Streptopeliarisoria), 16 days in ducks, Goldfinch (C. carduelis),and the male removed once and 35 days in chickens to 72 days in turkeys (see the clutch was complete.A single goldfinch mule was Birkhead 1987 for a review). No published informa- reared: this took 42 days (14 days of incubation and tion is available on the duration of sperm storagein 28 daysto rear the chick).The female canarywas then passerines.Here I report maximum sperm storageval- paired immediately with a male siskin, and within a ues for female domesticated Common Canaries (Ser- week a clutch had been laid. One chick was reared inus canaria). from this clutch, but this was alsoa goldfinch rather I collecteddata from a questionnaireto breedersof than a siskin mule. Estimatedsperm storageduration canariesand "mules" (i.e. hybrids between a British was 49 days. finch male x canary female). Six independent in- (5 and 6) The situation was identical to that in (2) stanceswere reported; in each case female canaries above, except that after the second brood had been laid fertile eggsseveral days or weeksafter separation reared and the chicks removed, the female laid a third from the males.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedera Helix Information Guide
    New York City EcoFlora Hedera helix L. English Ivy Araliaceae (Aralia family) Description: Evergreen woody vine, young shoots and inflorescences covered with stellate hairs or peltate scales; juvenile stems creeping and forming extensive mats, the mature stems up to 25 centimeters diameter, climbing by abundant, adventitious roots with adhesive pads. Leaves simple, alternate, dimorphic, 4–10 cm long; juvenile leaves palmately lobed with 3 or 5 triangular lobes, glabrous, the base cordate, the apex acute or acuminate, the upper surface shining and dark green with whitened veins, sometimes tinged purple in winter, the lower surface pale green; mature leaves ovate or rhombic, entire, otherwise like juveniles. Flowers in axillary umbels; sepals 5, very short; petals 5, fleshy, green; stamens 5; ovary inferior. Fruit a drupe with 2–3 pyrennes, turning black at maturity. Where Found: Hedera helix is native to Europe from Ireland and Norway to the Caucasus. In New York City, the species is most abundant near home sites and gardens where there is a history of cultivation, especially in suburban areas. Natural History: In its native Europe, bees and other insects obtain nectar from the flowers and birds disperse the fruit. The adventitious climbing roots secrete an adhesive polymer composed of nanoparticles. Root hairs shrink and curl as they dry, pulling the stem closer to the surface. These forces enable the plant to climb very high and accumulate great mass. When a tree is so encumbered, its photosynthetic potential is diminished and the tree is vulnerable to breakage in wind and ice storms. The ground covering impedes absorption from rainfall and creates desert-like conditions dominated by one species.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas
    sustainability Article Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas Vasilios Liordos 1,* , Jukka Jokimäki 2 , Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki 2, Evangelos Valsamidis 1 and Vasileios J. Kontsiotis 1 1 Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, International Hellenic University, 66100 Drama, Greece; [email protected] (E.V.); [email protected] (V.J.K.) 2 Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland; jukka.jokimaki@ulapland.fi (J.J.); marja-liisa.kaisanlahti@ulapland.fi (M.-L.K.-J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Knowing the ecological requirements of bird species is essential for their successful con- servation. We studied the niche characteristics of birds in managed small-sized green spaces in the urban core areas of southern (Kavala, Greece) and northern Europe (Rovaniemi, Finland), during the breeding season, based on a set of 16 environmental variables and using Outlying Mean Index, a multivariate ordination technique. Overall, 26 bird species in Kavala and 15 in Rovaniemi were recorded in more than 5% of the green spaces and were used in detailed analyses. In both areas, bird species occupied different niches of varying marginality and breadth, indicating varying responses to urban environmental conditions. Birds showed high specialization in niche position, with 12 species in Kavala (46.2%) and six species in Rovaniemi (40.0%) having marginal niches. Niche breadth was narrower in Rovaniemi than in Kavala. Species in both communities were more strongly associated either with large green spaces located further away from the city center and having a high vegetation cover (urban adapters; e.g., Common Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs), European Greenfinch (Chloris Citation: Liordos, V.; Jokimäki, J.; chloris Cyanistes caeruleus Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L.; ), Eurasian Blue Tit ( )) or with green spaces located closer to the city center Valsamidis, E.; Kontsiotis, V.J.
    [Show full text]