DOCSLIB.ORG

Author Comments Response Rob Hutsel 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Author Comments Response Rob Hutsel 1 APPENDIX 7 - COMMENTS ON THE INTERIM DRAFT STRATEGIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Author Comments Response Rob Hutsel 1. Three projects missing: Kumeyaay 1. These projects have been added in San Diego River Park Lakes Dredging and Berm Program 3 (pages 37-38). Foundation Verbal comments Restoration, Old Mission Dam 2. Language has been added throughout Dredging, Presidio Park Hill the document to reference the Stabilization importance of cultural and historic 2. On page 3, would like to see language resources. including history and culture 3. Reference removed. 3. On page 4, found language 4. Reference added (page 6). “committed to working 5. Commented noted. The Conservancy independently” troubling and would has not established this as a policy. It like to see it stricken from plan will be scheduled as a topic of a future 4. On page 5, would like to see “success” Board meeting. as an additional criterion added under 6. More references to partners were project criteria added throughout the document and a 5. On page 17, commented that trail list of key partners added in Appendix should go from Pacific Ocean to Trans 2. County Trail, not to Headwaters. Feels 7. Changes were made to the Mission those lands are already publicly Statement to reflect the discussion at available and very “pristine”. the meeting of February 10, 2006 6. Suggested mentioning the San Diego (page 4). River Park Foundation and San Diego River Coalition in the Executive Summary. 7. Recommended interim Mission Statement refer back to Article 2 of enabling legislation Mark Weston 1. Helix Water represents and owns a lot 1a. See revisions to Project 1.2 (page 11). Helix Water District of land east of Highway 67. Interest in 1b. Addition made (page 18). Verbal comments the Conservancy is as a partner and 1c. Addition made (page 19). wants document to be clear on the 1d. Addition made (page 24). following points: 1e. Change made (page 32). a. Project 1.2 El Monte Valley 1 APPENDIX 7 - COMMENTS ON THE INTERIM DRAFT STRATEGIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Author Comments Response Property 500 acres owned by Helix Water – does not want the Plan to suggest that Helix Water Board has taken any action b. Project 1.3 Cedar Creek Falls to City of San Diego – trail will have to cross Helix property and they want to be acknowledged as partner c. Project 1.5 Historic Flume Trail – as above would like to be acknowledged as a partner. d. Page 25 El Monte Park Amenities – Helix is a key partner and should be identified in the text. e. Page 32 Project 1.1 refers to El Monte Dam, but should be referenced as El Capitan Dam Deborah Jones 1. Urged adoption of the resolution to 1. Comment acknowledged. Lakeside’s River Park accept the Plan and move forward 2. Comment acknowledged. Conservancy 2. Presented SDRC Plan to Lakeside’s Verbal and written comments RPC Governing Board on Feb. 27th, 2006 which took an action to formally support the SDRC Plan Karen Scarborough 1. Commended staff and consultant 1. Comment acknowledged. Board Member 2. Expressed uncertainty about 60 day 2. Board will conduct a special meeting California Resources Agency review period – wants to see it done in March 2006 to consider adoption of Verbal comments sooner final Plan. 2 APPENDIX 7 - COMMENTS ON THE INTERIM DRAFT STRATEGIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Author Comments Response Jim Bartell 1. Commended staff and consultant 1. Comment acknowledged. Board Member 2. Expressed concern about review 2. Board will conduct a special meeting Verbal comments period being too long and stressed the in March 2006 to consider adoption of importance of getting a final Plan final Plan. adopted and to the State in March to 3. Reference was made to the tribes send a strong message to the Resource represented in the watershed in the Agency Assumptions section (page 5). 3. Page 8 referenced 3 jurisdictions with land use authority, but there are also 5 tribal nations that should be included since they have sovereignty within their boundaries Donna Frye 1. Expressed a desire to move quickly, 1. Comment acknowledged. Board Chair but wanted to be sure the public would 2. Mission statement revised to reflect San Diego City Council have enough time to comment comments from the Board and public Verbal comments 2. Along with board members present, at the meeting of February 10, 2006 moved to amend mission statement to (page 4). read “The mission of the San Diego River Conservancy is to further the goals of its enabling legislation (land conservation, recreation and education, habitat preservation and restoration, water quality and natural flood conveyance, and historical cultural) by conserving and restoring its land and water for the enjoyment of present and future generations John Minan 1. Moved to amend the mission 1. Mission statement revised to reflect Board Vice Chair statement comments from the Board and public SD Regional Water Quality 2. Generally felt there should be at the meeting of February 10, 2006 Control Board statement of why projects were (page 4). Verbal comments included (why they are significant or 2. Not all projects in all reaches were 3 APPENDIX 7 - COMMENTS ON THE INTERIM DRAFT STRATEGIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Author Comments Response important) included. Staff worked closely with 3. Removal of invasive species is Partners to select the highest priority important but projects should also be projects most likely to be designed to prevent reemergence (i.e. accomplished within the five year a management component is needed) planning period. Priority was based on 4. Reference to Assembly Bill should be the project criteria described in the changed to cite Public Resource Code introductory section. 3. Comment noted and reference included in Program 3 (page 30). 4. The Public Resource Code reference was included but the Assembly Bill reference was retained as many members of the public still cite the Assembly Bill reference when describing the San Diego River Conservancy Act. It is also desirable to recognize Senator Kehoe’s vital role in creating the Conservancy. Susan Hector 1. Expressed concern at the lack of 1. Additions made throughout the Board member mention of cultural and historic document to reflect the importance of Verbal comments resource significance. Specific written cultural and historic resources recommendations were subsequently pursuant to Dr. Hector’s submitted. recommendations. In addition, a new section of cultural preservation projects was added in Program 3. Jim Peugh 1. Wanted to see length of review period 1. Comment noted. Board member shortened 2. Additional references to partners were Verbal comments 2. Would like to see partners and added throughout the document. A list relationships amongst partners of key partners was added in Appendix mentioned in the Plan 2. 3. Would like to see more emphasis on 3. The recommendations from the 4 APPENDIX 7 - COMMENTS ON THE INTERIM DRAFT STRATEGIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Author Comments Response water quality measures Hydrology Assessment of the San 4. Would like to see “project Diego River Watershed will be used to maintainability” and “sustainability” define future projects to improve added to list of project criteria water quality and hydrology in the San 5. Page 27 – would like to see language Diego River. (page 41). removed about density and height of 4. Additions made (page 6). vegetation being one of the most 5. The language and photo have been important safety issues revised (page 26). Jim Madaffer 1. Would like to see two projects 1. These projects have been added in San Diego City Council included in the Plan: Program 3 (page 37). Written comments a. Kumeyaay Lakes Dredging and Berm Restoration b. Old Mission Dam Dredging Project Dorothy Leonard 1. Would like to see two projects 1. These projects have been added in Mission Trails Regional Park included in the Plan: Program 3 (page 37). Citizen’s Advisory Committee a. Kumeyaay Lakes Dredging and Written comments Berm Restoration b. Old Mission Dam Dredging Project Joshua Garcia, Paul Kilberg 1. General comment; trail info is vague, 1. The purpose of the Strategic and and Rick Thompson, City of seems like it loses specifics once west Infrastructure Plan is to provide broad San Diego, E-mail of Santee. goals consistent with the communication 2. Are the four goals of the Conservancy, Conservancy’s Statutory Authority listed on page 3, in order of which would later be refined in greater importance? detail. The information presented is 3. Program 1 (page 9); what would generally based on preliminary happen to any land the Conservancy analyses (including analyses in owned and managed after 2011? existing River Planning documents); 4. Project 1.8 (page 21); the southern additional details will be presented as stretch of the golf course is on land projects are refined. leased from the City of San Diego. In 2. No. 5 APPENDIX 7 - COMMENTS ON THE INTERIM DRAFT STRATEGIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Author Comments Response addition, this area is in critical habitat 3. If the Conservancy were to sunset, any for the Least Bells Vireo and there are owned land would be transitioned to a various existing and potential responsible entity prior to the sunset. mitigation sites along the river from 4. Comment noted. The River contains which recreation could be precluded important habitat for many species. as part of permit conditions for The Conservancy will balance the wetland mitigation from the various goals established in its statute to wildlife agencies. provide recreation, education and 5. Project 1.9 (page 21); no information access while protecting the resource. is provided on locations within the 5. See 1.above. The revised maps to be City of San Diego reaches for the included with the March 24, 2006 construction of 3.5 miles of trails.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING of the BOARD of DIRECTORS District Board Room, 2890 Mosquito Road, Placerville, California February 25, 2019 — 9:00 A.M
    AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS District Board Room, 2890 Mosquito Road, Placerville, California February 25, 2019 — 9:00 A.M. Board of Directors Alan Day—Division 5 George Osborne—Division 1 President Vice President Pat Dwyer—Division 2 Michael Raffety—Division 3 Lori Anzini—Division 4 Director Director Director Executive Staff Jim Abercrombie Brian D. Poulsen, Jr. Jennifer Sullivan General Manager General Counsel Clerk to the Board Jesse Saich Brian Mueller Mark Price Communications Engineering Finance Jose Perez Tim Ranstrom Dan Corcoran Human Resources Information Technology Operations PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to comment about items not on the Agenda may do so during the public comment period. Those wishing to comment about items on the Agenda may do so when that item is heard and when the Board calls for public comment. Public comments are limited to five minutes per person. PUBLIC RECORDS DISTRIBUTED LESS THAN 72 HOURS BEFORE A MEETING: Any writing that is a public record and is distributed to all or a majority of the Board of Directors less than 72 hours before a meeting shall be available for immediate public inspection in the office of the Clerk to the Board at the address shown above. Public records distributed during the meeting shall be made available at the meeting. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California law, it is the policy of El Dorado Irrigation District to offer its public programs, services, and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Source Water System
    CHAPTER 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SOURCE WATER SYSTEM 2.0 Description of the Source Water System During the last 100 years, the CSD’s water system has evolved into a very complex system. It is now estimated to serve a population of 1.4 million people spread out over 370 square miles (Table 2.1). The CSD treats imported raw water and local runoff water at three City WTPs which have a combined capacity of 378 MGD. The CSD treats water by conventional technologies using coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection. Recently, all CSD water treatment plants have been modified to provide for the addition of fluoride to the potable water supply. To ensure safe and palatable water quality, the CSD collects water samples at its reservoirs, WTPs, and throughout the treated water storage and distribution system. The CSD’s use of local and imported water to meet water demand is affected by availability, cost, and water resource management policies. Imported water availability decreases the need to carry over local water for dry years in City reservoirs. CSD policy is to use local water first to reduce imported water purchases; this policy runs the risk of increased dependence on imported water during local droughts. Table 2.1 - City of San Diego General Statistics Population (2010) 1,301,621 Population (Estimated 2014) 1,381,069 Population percent change 6.1 Land Area Square Miles 370 Population Density per Square Mile 3733 Water Distribution Area Square Miles 403 Number of Service Connections (2015) 279,102 2.1 Water Sources (Figure 2.1) Most of California's water development has been dictated by the multi-year wet/dry weather cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Availability Study Non-Groundwater Sources Sunrise Powerlink Environmentally Superior Southern Route
    Prepared for San Diego Gas & Electric Company 101 Ash Street, HQ13 San Diego, California 92101 Water Resources Availability Study Non-Groundwater Sources Sunrise Powerlink Environmentally Superior Southern Route Prepared by Geosyntec Consultants 10875 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92127 Geosyntec Project Number: SC0522 23 April 2010 Sunrise Powerlink Water Resources Availability Study Non-Groundwater Sources Table of Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Water Sources Evaluated .............................................................................................. 1 2. RECLAIMED WATER .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Regulatory Compliance for Use of Reclaimed Water .................................................. 4 2.1.1 Regional Water Quality Control Board – Region 9 – San Diego Basin ............................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Regional Water Quality Control Board – Region 7 – Colorado River Basin ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego History Center Is a Museum, Education Center, and Research Library Founded As the San Diego Historical Society in 1928
    The Jour nal of Volume 56 Winter/Spring 2010 Numbers 1 & 2 • The Journal of San Diego History San Diego History 1. Joshua Sweeney 12. Ellen Warren Scripps 22. George Washington 31. Florence May Scripps 2. Julia Scripps Booth Scripps Kellogg (Mrs. James M.) 13. Catherine Elizabeth 23. Winifred Scripps Ellis 32. Ernest O’Hearn Scripps 3. James S. Booth Scripps Southwick (Mrs. G.O.) 33. Ambrosia Scripps 4. Ellen Browning Scripps (Mrs. William D.) 24. William A. Scripps (Mrs. William A.) 5. Howard “Ernie” Scripps 14. Sarah Clarke Scripps 25. Anna Adelaide Scripps 34. Georgie Scripps, son 6. James E. Scripps (Mrs. George W.) (Mrs. George C.) of Anna and George C. 7. William E. Scripps 15. James Scripps Southwick 26. Baby of Anna and Scripps 8. Harriet Messinger 16. Jesse Scripps Weiss George C. Scripps 35. Hans Bagby Scripps (Mrs. James E.) 17. Grace Messinger Scripps 27. George H. Scripps 36. Elizabeth Sweeney 9. Anna Scripps Whitcomb 18. Sarah Adele Scripps 28. Harry Scripps (London, (Mrs. John S., Sr.) (Mrs. Edgar B.) 19. Jessie Adelaide Scripps England) 37. John S. Sweeney, Jr. 10. George G. Booth 20. George C. Scripps 29. Frederick W. Kellogg 38. John S. Sweeney, Sr. 11. Grace Ellen Booth 21. Helen Marjorie 30. Linnie Scripps (Mrs. 39. Mary Margaret Sweeney Wallace Southwick Ernest) Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors.
    [Show full text]
  • Rancho La Puerta, 2016
    The Journal of The Journal of SanSan DiegoDiego Volume 62 Winter 2016 Number 1 • The Journal of San Diego History Diego San of Journal 1 • The Number 2016 62 Winter Volume HistoryHistory The Journal of San Diego History Founded in 1928 as the San Diego Historical Society, today’s San Diego History Center is one of the largest and oldest historical organizations on the West Coast. It houses vast regionally significant collections of objects, photographs, documents, films, oral histories, historic clothing, paintings, and other works of art. The San Diego History Center operates two major facilities in national historic landmark districts: The Research Library and History Museum in Balboa Park and the Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The San Diego History Center presents dynamic changing exhibitions that tell the diverse stories of San Diego’s past, present, and future, and it provides educational programs for K-12 schoolchildren as well as adults and families. www.sandiegohistory.org Front Cover: Scenes from Rancho La Puerta, 2016. Back Cover: The San Diego River following its historic course to the Pacific Ocean. The San Diego Trolley and a local highrise flank the river. Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Editorial Assistants: Cynthia van Stralen Travis Degheri Joey Seymour Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. The Journal of San Diego History IRIS H.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Cultures and History in Calibaja Frontera Friday Issue Brief No
    INDIGENOUS CULTURES AND HISTORY IN CALIBAJA FRONTERA FRIDAY ISSUE BRIEF NO. 4 Frontera Fridays are quarterly events that connect leaders from both sides of the border to UC San Diego and serve as a platform for learning, networking and discussing opportunities and challenges that make our binational region unique. They are organized by the Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies (USMEX) at the School of Global Policy and Strategy (GPS) and the Urban Studies & Planning Program (USP) and honor the legacy of Chuck Nathanson and the San Diego Dialogue. The Kumeyaay-Digueno people (known as Kumiai in Baja California) have inhabited the Calibaja region for more than 10,000 years. They established seasonal settlements along the coast from north of La Jolla to Ensenada, in the mountain regions from Palomar through Tecate, and into the desert regions of the Imperial/Mexicali Valleys. They fished, hunted and utilized the wide varieties of plant life found in the San Diego and Tijuana River watersheds both for food and medicine. The arrival of the Spanish missionaries and soldiers in the late 18th century disrupted the Kumeyaay way of life. They were forced to labor on the mission properties, cultivating non-native plants and raising livestock. Although the first Baja California mission was established at Loreto in what is now Baja California Sur in 1697, there was not significant presence of Spaniards in the Kumeyaay areas until after the founding of the San Diego de Alcala mission in 1769. After that, land grants awarding traditional lands to the foreigners, encroachment on villages by colonizing ranchers and settlers, and death from forced labor and foreign diseases followed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report
    2018 Quality Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Value Reliability Customer Service 1 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 2018 City of San Diego’s Tap Water Supply Meets all State and Federal Health Standards in 2018 The City of San Diego is committed to providing you with a clean, safe and stable water supply. It’s the priority of every employee of the City’s Public Utilities Department. Those efforts matter. Based on the water quality monitoring data collected in 2018, the City’s tap water met all state and federal drinking water health standards, which are the primary standards for treating and monitoring water. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Division of Drinking Water mandate all water agencies to produce an annual document educating customers about their drinking water quality for the previous year. This annual Drinking Water Quality Report details the origin of the City’s water supply, what it contains and how it meets health standards. A Message from the Director CONTACT On behalf of the 1,600 team members in the City of San Diego’s Public Utilities Public Utilities Emergency Hotline ...........................................619-515-3525 Department, I am pleased to deliver the 2018 Drinking Water Quality Report. General and Billing Information ..............................................619-515-3500 As the water supplier to 1.4 million customers, it is our job to provide you with safe [email protected] and reliable drinking water. We are proud that the 300,000 tests we conduct annually Water Quality Lab .................................................................. 619-668-3232 demonstrate that our water meets all regulatory quality standards.
    [Show full text]
  • 11020600 El Capitan Lake Near Lakeside, CA San Diego River Basin
    Water-Data Report 2008 11020600 El Capitan Lake near Lakeside, CA San Diego River Basin LOCATION.--Lat 32°5256, long 116°4830 referenced to North American Datum of 1927, in SE ¼ NE ¼ sec.7, T.15 S., R.2 E., San Diego County, CA, Hydrologic Unit 18070304, on left bank, 100 ft upstream from El Capitan Dam on San Diego River, and 7.0 mi east of Lakeside. DRAINAGE AREA.--188 mi². SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1936 to September 1966 (published with San Diego River at El Capitan Dam, station 11020500), October 1972 to September 1993, March 2004 to current year. Monthend contents only October 1972 to September 1987. October 1936 to September 1945, published in WSP 1315-B, not equivalent due to exclusion of greater part of flow released from Cuyamaca Reservoir. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is NGVD of 1929 (levels by city of San Diego). Prior to October 1987, nonrecording gage at same site. REMARKS.--Reservoir is formed by hydraulic fill-rock embankment, completed in 1935. Capacity of reservoir at spillway level, 112,810 acre-ft, elevation, 750.00 ft. Dead storage below lowest outlet, 59 acre-ft, elevation, 574.00 ft. Reservoir storage includes supplemental Colorado River water. No significant diversion upstream from reservoir. Inflow partly regulated by Cuyamaca Reservoir, capacity, 11,740 acre-ft. Water is released as required for municipal use and irrigation. See schematic diagram of the San Diego River Basin available from the California Water Science Center. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum contents observed, 114,500 acre-ft, spilling, Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Removal of the Indians of El Capitan to Viejas: Confrontation and Change in San Diego Indian Affairs in the 1930S by Tanis C
    The Removal of the Indians of El Capitan to Viejas: Confrontation and Change in San Diego Indian Affairs in the 1930s By Tanis C. Thorne When the city of san diego developed its water resources in the early twentieth century, the Indians of the Capitan grande reservation (also called “El Capitan”) were an important group of stakeholders. they lived along the san diego river in the flood zone of the El Capitan reservoir. the city had purchased their lands in 1919 and 1932 so that the dam could be built. In august 1933, however, a determined group of Indians delayed construc- tion by refusing to permit their graveyard to be dis- turbed until the department of the Interior agreed to pur- chase the Baron long ranch as their new home. Mayor John Hammond urged John Col- lier, Commissioner of Indian affairs, to buy this “splendid” ranch for the Indians.1 But the stalemate dragged on into the late summer months of 1934 with no resolution in sight. Map of Capitan Grande Reservation and its “Successors-in-Interest” Barona and Viejas. To create the water reservoir for the city of San an exasperated official in the Diego, the Department of the Interior relocated the entire population Bureau of Indian affairs (BIa) of the reservation. Credit: Tanis C. Thorne and James Woods. sought legal authority for the department of the Interior to remove the Indians and their graveyard “with whatever degree of force the situation may require.”2 t he account of how this situation came to such an impasse—and how it was Tanis C.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Future Decision Development Services Department
    DATE OF NOTICE: February 23, 2021 NOTICE OF FUTURE DECISION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Development Services Department staff will make a decision to approve, conditionally approve, modify or deny an application for a Site Development Permit (Process 2) for impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Lands from removal of accumulated debris and vegetation on the El Capitan Dam spillway, a City-owned facility. The site is located along the San Diego River at the western end of the El Capitan Reservoir within the El Monte Valley northwest of the community of Alpine in central San Diego County. As a property owner, tenant, or person who has requested notice, you should know that the Development Services Department Staff will make a decision to approve, conditionally approve, modify or deny an application for a Site Development Permit. The application was filed on January 28, 2021. PROJECT NO: 679843 PROJECT NAME: EL CAPITAN DAM SPILLWAY PROJECT TYPE: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, PROCESS TWO APPLICANT: MEGAN HICKEY COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: None COUNCIL DISTRICT: N/A (Not within City Limits) CITY PROJECT MANAGER: Karen Bucey, Development Project Manager PHONE NUMBER/E-MAIL: (619) 446-5049 / [email protected] The decision by City staff will be made without a public hearing no less than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of mailing the Notice of Future Decision. If you want to receive a "Notice of Decision", you must submit a written request to the City Project Manager listed above no later than ten (10) business days from the mailing date of this Notice. This project is undergoing environmental review.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.0 Sediment Sources
    5.0 SEDIMENT SOURCES Information on sediment suitability and existing/future sediment sources for restoration projects within the San Diego Coastal RSM Plan area is presented within this section. Although some information regarding these sources is known, information regarding material properties, timeframe of their availability and transport costs vary and are still being determined. Important characteristics of sediment source types are provided in Table 6. These sources vary in quantity, and the frequency of which they become available are shown in Table 7, which is not necessarily comprehensive. It shows basic sources but could be expanded, and sediment quality is unknown as well. Table 6: Existing Sediment Sources Property Upland Soil Flood Control Lagoon Bays/Harbors Offshore Basin/Corridor Ocean Grain Size Narrow range, Broad range, Narrow range, Moderate Narrowest but more fines rocks to silts, also mainly fine to range, sandy range, medium near surface debris medium sand to silty sand (25%+) Chemistry Potential Potential Typically clean Clean to Clean contaminants in contaminants contaminated top 5 feet throughout Quantity Very small to Very small Small-Moderate * Moderate to Largest Small, (<25,000 (<25,000 cy); (25,000’s to large* (>1,000,000 to 100,000 cy) Dams can be 500,000 cy) (100,000’s to cy) significant millions cy) (500,000 cy) Typical Annually or Annually to bi- Annually to every Annually to Every 5 to 10 Availability semi-annually annually 3 years every 5 or years or more more years *Restoration or development may generate very large volumes San Diego Coastal RSM Plan 63 Distance to SOURCE QUANTITY Coast DATE DESIGNATION LOCATION Source Name (Cubic Yards) (Miles) OWNERSHIP AVAILABLE CONTACT PHONE North County Coastal Camp Pendleton - Santa Margarita NC-CP-SMR Oceanside River -- 2-5 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hodges Reservoir Questions and Answers
    Questions & Answers Hodges Reservoir Water Level The Hodges Reservoir Dam is a multiple arch dam with ogee spillway that was built in 1918. It has a total storage capacity of 30,000 acre feet. The dam is located north of Rancho Bernardo, and is within the jurisdiction of the California Division of Safety of Dams. The elevation of the water storage at Hodges Reservoir is being maintained at a maximum level of 295 feet. The Division of Safety of Dams supports the continued operation of the reservoir at this level • To maintain safety of the dam structure and surrounding communities, • To ensure efficient use of the local water supply by the City and other local water agencies, • And to allow for necessary maintenance and improvement work on the Hodges Dam to occur. Questions & Answers What is the purpose of Hodges Reservoir? The primary function of Hodges Reservoir is to impound water for drinking water purposes. Secondary functions are to provide renewable energy and recreational opportunities. Who does the water in Hodges Reservoir serve? Water in Hodges Reservoir is used to primarily serve the City of San Diego, City of Solana Beach, portions of the City of Encinitas and communities of Rancho Santa Fe and Fairbanks Ranch. In addition, water in Hodges Reservoir is part of the San Diego County Water Authority’s regional emergency supply that can be used to meet demands during an emergency event. Why is the reservoir level being restricted? Hodges Dam is more than 100 years old. As with any piece of aging infrastructure, the materials that make up the dam have deteriorated to a point that repairs are now needed.
    [Show full text]