A Long Haul Partnership
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Airlines Operating in the Pacific Updated 27 October 2020 Company Restrictions Website Air Calin (New Caledonia) See Link
Please note, although we endeavour to provide you with the most up to date information derived from various third parties an d sources, we cannot be held accountable for any inaccuracies or changes to this information. Inclusion of company information in this matrix does not imply any business relationship between the suppli er and WFP / Logistics Cluster, and is used solely as a determinant of services, and capacities. Logistics Cluster /WFP maintain complete impartiality and are not in a position to endorse, comment on any company's suitability as a reputable service provider. If you have any updates to share, please email them to: [email protected] Airlines Operating in the Pacific Updated 27 October 2020 company restrictions website Air Calin (New Caledonia) See link. https://pf.aircalin.com/en/breaking-news-covid-19 Air Caledonie 24 July: Resumption of all commercial air transport operations https://www.air-caledonie.nc/en/ Air Kiribati See link. http://www.airkiribati.com.ki Air Loyaute (New Caledonia) 24 July: Resumption of all commercial air transport operations https://www.air-loyaute.nc Air Marshall Islands No international flights http://www.airmarshallislands.net Air New Zealand 15 October: Air New Zealand will operate its first flight as part of the Safe Travel Zone with New South Wales on 16 October 2020. https://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/media-releases 26 October: Air Niugini is pleased to announce that it will resume services between Port Moresby and Hong Kong, commencing Wednesday https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10164123143590237&id= Air Niuguini 28th October 2020. 88806860236 Air Tahiti 26 October: Rarotonga (Cook Islands): flights suspended due to the border closure www.airtahiti.aero 7 October: Given the continuation of international border entry/exit restrictions following the spread of the viral infection known as COVID- 19, Air Tahiti Nui will need to apply additional flight cancellations. -
Chart Change Notices Eas-1
17 SEP 21 CHART CHANGE NOTICES EAS-1 EASTERN EUROPE SPECIAL MANUAL q$i Jeppesen CHART CHANGE NOTICES highlight only significant changes affecting Jeppesen Charts, also regularly updated at www.jeppesen.com. IMPORTANT: CHECK FOR NOTAMS AND OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION PRIOR TO FLIGHT. ENROUTE CHARTS FRA waypoint VOLBI (N4138.9 E01941.4) withdrawn. E LO-13, E LO-14. GENERAL GRID MORA (N41-N42, E019-E020) raised to 7700. According to Amendment 85 to ICAO Annex 10 all E LO-13, E LO-14. ACAS units shall be compliant with version 7.1 BELARUS after 1 January 2017. ATS ROUTES changed: AUSTRIA L29, INKUZ NCRP estbld at N5453.7 E02614.0; FRA waypoint estbld: MUGGU at N4756.2 LAFAT - INKUZ, 16NM, MEA FL80; INKUZ - E01554.7. E HI-9. RAMBE, 42NM, MEA FL100. E LO-10, E HI-4, FRA waypoint estbld: PIBIP at N4656.5 E01534.7. E HI-15. E HI-9, E LO-12. L749, EPFIN NCRP estbld at N5435.8 E02610.3; TEDRO - EPFIN - ZENIT, 62/16NM. E LO-10, FINLAND E HI-4, E HI-15. FRA waypoint estbld: OMZER at N6033.7 E02750.8 M856, Viciebsk VORDME (VTB) to OLAGO, and VULEZ at N6112.6 E02904.9. E HI-3. cruising levels chgd to NON-standard, ODD ITALY levels N-bound; Directional MAAs chgd: FL450 N-bound, FL280 S-bound. E LO-10, E LO-9. ATS ROUTE SYSTEM (LOW) revised within Milan M874, ANHOM NCRP estbld at N5439.9 E02615.2; FIR. For details refer to CCN 313. E LO-12. NELOK - ANHOM - ZENIT, 124/18NM. -
Sep 0 1 2004
AEROSPACE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS FROM A LEAN ENTERPRISE PERSPECTIVE by JUNHONG KIM B.S., Chemical Engineering Seoul National University (1998) SUBMITTED TO THE SYSTEM DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2004 @0 2004 Junhong Kim. All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author......... ........................ Junhong Kim /ste7&Ies 'and Management Program February 2004 Certified by ... .........I . ...................... Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld Executive Director, Engineering Systems Learning Center Senior Research Scientist, Sloan School of Management Accepted by ....................................................... -........................... Thomas J. Allen Co-Director, LFM/SDM Howard W. Johnson Professor of Management r A c c ep te d b y ............................. ......... ............................................................................................ David Simchi-Levi Co-Director, LFM/SDM MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE| Professor of Engineering Systems O.F TENL GYL.J SEP 0 1 2004 BARKER LIBRARIES Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITL-ibries Email: [email protected] Document Services http://Iibraries.mit.eduldocs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there -
Aerospace Action Plan Progress Report
QUEENSLAND AEROSPACE 10-Year Roadmap and Action Plan PROGRESS REPORT By 2028, the Queensland aerospace industry will be recognised as a leading centre in Australasia and South East Asia for aerospace innovation in training; niche manufacturing; maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO); and unmanned aerial systems (UAS) applications for military and civil markets. Launch Completion 2018 2028 International border closures due to COVID-19 had a dramatic impact on the aerospace industry in Queensland, particularly the aviation sector. Despite this temporary industry downturn, the Queensland Government has continued to stimulate the aerospace industry through investment in infrastructure, technology and international promotion. I look forward to continuing to champion Queensland aerospace businesses, taking the industry to new heights. The Honourable Steven Miles MP DEPUTY PREMIER and MINISTER FOR STATE DEVELOPMENT Case study – Queensland Flight Test Range in Cloncurry The Queensland Government has invested $14.5 million to establish the foundation phase of a common-user flight test range with beyond visual line of sight capabilities at Cloncurry Airport. The Queensland Flight Test Range (QFTR) provides a critical missing element in the UAS ecosystem for industry and researchers to test and develop complex technologies. Operated by global defence technology company QinetiQ, the QFTR supports the Queensland Government’s goal of establishing the state as a UAS centre of excellence and a UAS leader in the Asia-Pacific region. Inaugural testing at QFTR was completed by Boeing Australia in late 2020. Director of Boeing Phantom Works International Emily Hughes said the company was proud to be the first user of the site and would take the opportunity to continue flight trials on key autonomous projects. -
PDF Download
August 2008 | Volume VII, Issue IV www.boeing.com/frontiers The Weapons Program team at Boeing is reinventing itself to better meet emerging warfighter needs. August 2008 Volume VII, Issue IV BOEING FRONTIERS ON THE COVER: Mike Dour performs final-assembly tasks on a Small Diameter Bomb in St. Charles, Mo. RICHARD RAU PHOTO COVER STORY RICHARD RAU PHOTO BULLSEYE | 12 Otis Stith uses ergonomic handling equipment to move a Joint Direct Attack Munition tailkit from the St. Charles, Mo., assembly line to the packaging area. He’s a member of the newly formed Weapons Programs organization, which is reinventing itself to better meet warfighter needs and deliver even greater capabilities to U.S. and allied forces. FEATURE STORY | 50 Rich history, strong future Turkey reveres its storied past as it moves confidently into a technologically capable, global future. With 65 percent of its population age 34 and under, the country is working to develop a tech-savvy work force. That’s important to Boeing, which is undertaking a cross-enterprise approach to doing business in this market—the home to customers in both the commercial and defense segments. BOEING FRONTIERS AUGUST 2008 3 Contents BOEING FRONTIERS A clean handoff | 22 In July, the first P-8A Poseidon achieved “factory complete” status as workers at the Boeing Commercial Airplanes factory in Renton, Wash., rolled it off the moving assembly line. Now, Integrated Defense Systems teammates will com- plete systems integration and functional checks. A load of assistance | 27 Boeing Commercial Airplanes’ structures engineer- ing team was spread thin supporting several development programs. -
Aviation Week & Space Technology
STARTS AFTER PAGE 34 Using AI To Boost How Emirates Is Extending ATM Efficiency Maintenance Intervals ™ $14.95 JANUARY 13-26, 2020 2020 THE YEAR OF SUSTAINABILITY RICH MEDIA EXCLUSIVE Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa. -
The Boeing Company 2002 Annual Report
The Boeing Company 200220022002 AnnualAnnualAnnual ReportReportReport Vision 2016: People working together as a global enterprise for aerospace leadership. Strategies Core Competencies Values Run healthy core businesses Detailed customer knowledge Leadership Leverage strengths into new and focus Integrity products and services Large-scale system integration Quality Open new frontiers Lean enterprise Customer satisfaction People working together A diverse and involved team Good corporate citizenship Enhancing shareholder value The Boeing Company Table of Contents Founded in 1916, Boeing evokes vivid images of the amazing products 1 Operational Highlights and services that define aerospace. Each day, more than three million 2 Message to Shareholders passengers board 42,300 flights on Boeing jetliners, more than 345 8 Corporate Essay satellites put into orbit by Boeing launch vehicles pass overhead, and 16 Corporate Governance 6,000 Boeing military aircraft stand guard with air forces of 23 countries 18 Commercial Airplanes and every branch of the U.S. armed forces. 20 Integrated Defense Systems We are the leading aerospace company in the world and a top U.S. 22 Boeing Capital Corporation exporter. We hold more than 6,000 patents, and our capabilities and 24 Air Traffic Management related services include formulation of system-of-systems solutions, 26 Phantom Works advanced information and communications systems, financial services, 28 Connexion by BoeingSM homeland security, defense systems, missiles, rocket engines, launch 30 Shared Services Group systems and satellites. 32 Financials But Boeing is about much more than statistics or products, no matter 88 Selected Products, how awe-inspiring. It’s also about the enterprising spirit of our people Programs and Services working together to provide customers the best solutions possible. -
Switchfly Reward Seat Availability Survey
Contact: Jay Sorensen For inquiries: 414-961-1939 Jay @ IdeaworksCompany.com Southwest, airberlin, Virgin Australia Still Tops For Rewards, But Delta and Turkish Airlines Make Big Leaps Upward IdeaWorksCompany releases results from the 5th annual Switchfly Reward Seat Availability Survey. May 8, 2014, Shorewood, Wisconsin - - Value-oriented airlines dominate the results in the 5th annual Switchfly Reward Seat Availability Survey. Airberlin, Southwest, and Virgin Australia have placed within the top six slots for every edition of the reward survey since 2010. For 2014 airberlin and Southwest share first place with outstanding 100% scores; every flight queried in the survey provided reward seats at saver-style levels. The 25 carriers in the survey remained the same as 2013, except China Southern replaced AirTran as the latter continues to be absorbed by its parent Southwest Airlines. The Switchfly Reward Seat Availability Survey is based upon 7,640 booking queries made by the IdeaWorksCompany at the websites of 25 frequent flier programs during March 2014. Travel dates spanned June through October 2014, with top routes for each carrier checked to assess “saver style” reward seat availability. Two perennial laggards, Turkish and Delta, experienced sizeable year-over-year improvement for the 2014 survey. The largest-ever improvement over the 5-year history of the survey was posted by Turkish Airlines. The Miles&Smiles program jumped an amazing 45.7 points from a near- bottom 2013 placement of 40% overall reward availability to 85.7% for 2014. The airline recently announced improvements to its frequent flier program which included the promise of more reward seats to “improve the level of satisfaction of the esteemed members.” Very quickly, Turkish has become one of the best-rated global loyalty programs for reward availability instead of one of the worst. -
State Overview "Aerodrome Operating Minimums
State Overview “Aerodrome Operating Minimums – Jeppesen” (updated 1 Feb 2021) The following tables indicate which Aerodrome Operating Minimums (AOM) rules will be applied for a specific State/Country when converting the Aerodrome Operating Minima after Jan 2020. Even if there is no State AOM concept available for the country, there might be take-off or landing visibilities published for a specific airport or for specific approach procedures (AD Characteristics, Instrument Approach Procedure, Departure Procedure Sources,..). Therefore, Jeppesen may have to depict a State label on a specific chart, even there is a Std label on all other charts. For Military procedures AOM may be published on procedure source, even though there is no AOM concept in place for Civil procedures. Existing 10-9S pages for EASA AIR OPS operators are kept and updated to allow operators to compare EASA AIR OPS minimums against the minimums based on ICAO Doc 9365. New 10-9S pages are only published if requested by an operator. States Beginning with A - B States beginning with A - B ICAO Minimums 10-9S Country AOM concept Additional Information Code(s) Box Label handling State, or State or Military kept and Afghanistan OA State AOM Military minimums on IAP updated EASA AIR EU Candidate/EU and/or Albania LA Std/State --- OPS EASA State AOM on IAC, take- kept and Algeria DA State AOM State off according AIC 02/01 updated Std, in some On some IAPs there are kept and Angola FN ICAO cases State visibilities provided. updated IAC and Take-off kept and Argentina SA State AOM State visibilities per State updated Exceptions Some minimum kept and Armenia UD ICAO Std visibilities on IAC updated kept and Ascension Is FHAW Military Military on IAC updated On IAC and State kept and Australia Y State AOM State Exceptions. -
Modern Slavery Statement 2021
BOEING AUSTRALIA: MODERN SLAVERY STATEMENT 2020 This statement is made on behalf of Boeing Australia Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Boeing Aerostructures Australia Pty Ltd, Boeing Defence Australia Ltd, Boeing Distribution Services Pty Ltd, Aviall Australia Pty Ltd, Insitu Pacific Pty Ltd, and Jeppesen Australia Pty Ltd (collectively, “Boeing Australia” or “we”). This statement sets out the steps that Boeing Australia entities have taken to address risks of modern slavery within our business operations and supply chains. This statement is made pursuant to sections 13 and 16 of the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (“the Act”) with respect to the financial year ending 30 November 2020 which aligns with the financial year of our parent company. Our structure, operations managing the complete lifecycle of defence platforms and supply chain and providing platforms and networked systems to government customers in Australia, New Zealand and Boeing Australia Holdings (ACN: 101 168 932) is a Southeast Asia. subsidiary of The Boeing Company, a multinational In addition, Boeing Australia has a significant research corporation headquartered in the United States. and development team which partners with universities Despite only two of our Boeing Australia entities (Boeing around Australia, CSIRO, the Defence Science and Aerostructures Australia and Boeing Defence Australia) Technology Group (DSTG) and others to create and meeting the reporting entity threshold under the Act, deliver cutting-edge technologies that advance the local our local leadership team has decided to establish a Australian and global aerospace industries. nationwide framework to demonstrate our commitment to addressing the Commonwealth Government’s Boeing Australia has a robust supplier base in Australia desire for modern slavery risks to be accounted for by as part of its commitment to building out sovereign businesses operating within the Australian economy. -
Dear Luke / Louise / Morelle
Dear Luke / Louise / Morelle In reviewing the application for authorisation of the proposed alliance between Virgin Blue and Etihad, certain factual questions have emerged. It would be useful if information could be provided regarding the following questions: 1. What are the various airlines in which Virgin Group Limited has a financial interest that compete with Etihad on any route in the world? Please identify entity (e.g. Virgin Atlantic, AirAsiaX, Air Nigeria, Virgin America, Virgin Blue, Pacific Blue, Polynesian Blue and V Australia) and routes on which they overlap with Etihad. 2. Please detail the legal and commercial relationships between Virgin Blue Holdings Ltd and each of the other airlines around the world in which Virgin Group Limited has a financial interest (including Virgin Atlantic, AirAsiaX, Air Nigeria, Virgin America and any others). Please identify and describe the areas in which the commercial interests of Virgin Blue and any other Virgin entity are aligned or joint. What are the terms of the "partnership" between Virgin Blue andlor V Australia and Virgin America and Virgin Atlantic that V Australia claims on its website? 3. How many V Australia passengers connect tolfrom a Virgin Atlantic flight originating from Europe? What proportion of total V Australia passengers do these passengers represent? What proportion of these passengers travel beyond international gateway destinations in Australia on a Virgin Blue flight? 4. Market share information: What is the Alliances' expected share of the trans Australia-Europe market and the trans UAE- Europe market? What is Virgin Atlantic's share of the trans Asia-Europe market? What share of the global market do airlines in which Virgin Group Ltd has a financial interest account for? 5. -
The Evolution of Low Cost Carriers in Australia
AVIATION ISSN 1648-7788 / eISSN 1822-4180 2014 Volume 18(4): 203–216 10.3846/16487788.2014.987485 THE EVOLUTION OF LOW COST CARRIERS IN AUSTRALIA Panarat SRISAENG1, Glenn S. BAXTER2, Graham WILD3 School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia 3001 E-mails: [email protected] (corresponding author); [email protected]; [email protected] Received 30 June 2014; accepted 10 October 2014 Panarat SRISAENG Education: bachelor of economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 1993. Master of business economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, 1998. Affiliations and functions: PhD (candidate) in aviation, RMIT University, School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. Research interests: low cost airline management; demand model for air transportation; demand forecasting for air transportation. Glenn S. BAXTER, PhD Education: bachelor of aviation studies, the University of Western Sydney, Australia, 2000. Master of aviation studies, the University of Western Sydney, Australia, 2002. PhD, School of Aviation, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia, 2011. Affiliations and functions: Lecturer in Aviation Management and Deputy Manager of Undergraduate Aviation Programs, at RMIT University, School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. Research interests: air cargo handling and operations; airport operations and sustainability; supply chain management. Graham WILD, PhD Education: 2001–2004 – bachelor of science (Physics and Mathematics), Edith Cowan University. 2004–2005 – bachelor of science honours (Physics), Edith Cowan University. 2008 – Graduate Certificate (Research Commercialisation), Queensland University of Technology. 2006–2008 – master of science and technology (Photonics and Optoelectronics), the University of New South Wales. 2006–2010, PhD (Engineering), Edith Cowan University. Affiliations and functions: 2010, Postdoctoral research associate, Photonics Research Laboratory, Edith Cowan University.