DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Statement Hermanville/Clearspring 30 Megawatt Wind Farm Hermanville, Pe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Statement Hermanville/Clearspring 30 Megawatt Wind Farm Hermanville, Pe ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HERMANVILLE/CLEARSPRING 30 MEGAWATT WIND FARM HERMANVILLE, PE FINAL REPORT Submitted to: Prince Edward Island Energy Corporation Charlottetown, PE Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, A Division of AMEC Americas Limited Fredericton, NB January 2013 TE121023 PEI Energy Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment – Final Report Hermanville/Clearspring – 30 MW Wind Farm Hermanville/Clearspring, PE January, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prince Edward Island Energy Corporation (“PEIEC”) proposes to develop and operate a 30 megawatt (MW) wind farm. The Hermanville/Clearspring 30 MW Wind Farm, hereafter referred to as the “Project”, would be located between Clearspring and Hermanville, near the northeastern tip of the province of Prince Edward Island (PEI). The Study Area consists of approximately 4.5 kilometres (km) along Northside Road (Route 16) between New Zealand Road and Souris Line Road; 3 km along New Zealand Road from Northside Road, 2 km along Souris Line Road from Northside Road and 4.4 km along the southern boundary. The Study Area has been used in the past and currently for forestry purposes. The main stem of the proposed transmission line will be located along the eastern boundary of Souris Line Road between Northside Road and Grant Road. The Study Area has minimal residential development around its perimeter and can meet the Provincial requirements of a setback four (4) times the height of the turbine from any residential development. Along Souris Line Road, the proposed transmission line will run adjacent to six (6) residential properties. Approximately 20 km east of the Project is the East Point Wind Farm which currently operates ten (10) wind turbines and was also developed by PEIEC. The proposed Project implementation will begin Spring 2013, with operations to begin in late fall 2013. The Project will consist of erecting ten (10) wind turbines, each capable of producing 3 MW for a total nameplate production of 30 MW; a meteorological mast; a buried and/or overhead electrical collector system; single phase power line for the substation, substation; service building, 138 kilovolt (kV) transmission line between the substation and existing T-12 transmission line; as well as access roads to each turbine, substation and service building. Key environmental features identified within the Study Area are watercourses, wetlands, avian fauna (birds and bats) as well as identified floral Species-at-Risk. The operational life of this Project’s assets is expected to be twenty-five (25) years, at which time the assets will have to be replaced or decommissioned. The goal of the Project is to allow PEIEC to fulfil its directive to develop another 30 MW of wind power for domestic consumption by 2013 as stated in the PEI Energy Accord. Direct, measurable benefits of the Project to the Province and Canada will include: • reduced emissions, thereby contributing to Canada’s objective of reducing national total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 17% from 2005 levels by the year 2020; • enabling the Province to generate approximately 30% of its electricity from renewable power; • lowered dependence on imports of electricity to the Province; • more stabilized electricity costs within the Province; and • economic development benefits to the local area. TE121023_PEI_WindProject_EIA_Final_Report_29Jan2013_cml_cjy Page (ii) PEI Energy Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment – Final Report Hermanville/Clearspring – 30 MW Wind Farm Hermanville/Clearspring, PE January, 2013 This report addresses the environmental effects of the construction, operation and decommissioning project phases. The information reviewed and field studies have shown that no significant adverse residual impacts on the valued environmental components (VECs) are likely. The generation of electricity from renewable resources such as wind is in accordance with federal and provincial strategies, since it contributes to the reduction of GHG emissions and air pollutants. The Hermanville/Clearspring 30 MW Wind Farm, once approved, would contribute to the reduction of GHG emissions required to meet Canada’s and the Province of PEI’s targets. TE121023_PEI_WindProject_EIA_Final_Report_29Jan2013_cml_cjy Page (iii) PEI Energy Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment – Final Report Hermanville/Clearspring – 30 MW Wind Farm Hermanville/Clearspring, PE January, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT .......................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT PROPONENT AND PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENTS ................................. 1 1.3 TITLE OF PROJECT ................................................................................................... 2 1.4 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF WIND FARM ................................................................. 4 1.5.1 Nominal Capacity ............................................................................................ 4 1.5.2 Expected Annual Energy Production ............................................................... 4 1.6 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ................................................................................... 4 1.7 AGENCIES INVOLVED IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................ 4 1.7.1 Municipal Agency Involvement in the Project .................................................. 4 1.7.2 Provincial Agency Involvement in the Project .................................................. 5 1.7.3 Federal Agency Involvement in the Project ..................................................... 5 1.8 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................... 5 1.8.1 Regulations and Statutes Involved in Assessing the Project ........................... 5 1.9 AUTHOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT .......................................... 5 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 10 2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ....................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 National and Regional Political Considerations ............................................. 10 2.2 PURPOSE OF PROJECT ......................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Justification for the Project ............................................................................ 11 2.2.2 Project Objectives .......................................................................................... 11 2.3 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT ....................................................................... 11 2.4 SUMMARY OF PROJECT ........................................................................................ 12 2.5 LOCATION OF PROJECT ........................................................................................ 14 2.5.1 Site Layout ..................................................................................................... 14 2.5.2 Land Ownership ............................................................................................ 14 2.5.3 Key Environmental and Cultural Features ..................................................... 17 2.6 DETAILED PROJECT ACTIVITIES .......................................................................... 17 2.6.1 Planning Phase ............................................................................................. 17 2.6.1.1 Surveying Activities .................................................................................... 17 2.6.2 Construction Phase ....................................................................................... 21 TE121023_PEI_WindProject_EIA_Final_Report_29Jan2013_cml_cjy Page (iv) PEI Energy Corporation Environmental Impact Assessment – Final Report Hermanville/Clearspring – 30 MW Wind Farm Hermanville/Clearspring, PE January, 2013 2.6.2.1 Site Preparation .......................................................................................... 22 2.6.2.2 New and Existing Access Roads ............................................................... 22 2.6.2.3 Delivery of Equipment ................................................................................ 24 2.6.2.4 Wind Turbine Assembly ............................................................................. 24 2.6.2.5 Substation Power Line ............................................................................... 28 2.6.2.6 Interconnection Cabling ............................................................................. 28 2.6.2.7 Transmission Line ...................................................................................... 28 2.6.2.8 On-site Substation ...................................................................................... 29 2.6.2.9 On-site Service Building ............................................................................. 30 2.6.2.10 Gates and Fencing ..................................................................................... 30 2.6.2.11 Turbine Commissioning ............................................................................. 30 2.6.3 Operation Phase ............................................................................................ 30 2.6.3.1 Road Maintenance ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Jp Elektroprivrede Hz Herceg Bosne
    Vjesnik JP ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE CHE Čapljina – 30 godina www.ephzhb.ba INFORMATIVNO - STRUČNI LIST / Godina X. / Broj 44 / Mostar, srpanj 2009. Informativno-stručni list, Vjesnik Glavni i odgovorni urednik: JP Elektroprivreda HZ HB d.d., Mostar Vlatko Međugorac Izdaje: Uredništvo: Sektor za odnose s javnošću Vlatko Međugorac, Mira Radivojević, mr. sc. Irina Budimir, Vanda Rajić, Zoran Pavić Ulica dr. Mile Budaka 106A, Mostar tel.: 036 335-727 Naklada: 800 primjeraka faks: 036 335-779 e-mail: [email protected] Tisak: www.ephzhb.ba FRAM-ZIRAL, Mostar Rukopisi i fotografije se ne vraćaju. 2 INFORMATIVNO STRUČNI LIST JAVNOGA PODUZEĆA ELEKTROPRIVREDE HZ HERCEG BOSNE Sadržaj Novim informacijskim sustavom (SAP-om) do boljega poslovanja .......4 Održana VII. skupština Elektroprivrede HZ HB ................................7 Izvješće neovisnoga revizora ..................................................................8 str. 4 Potpisani ugovori o istražnim radovima na CHE Vrilo.......................10 Elektroprivreda i liberalizacija tržišta ..................................................11 30. rođendan CHE Čapljina ...............................................................13 Posjet njemačkoga veleposlanika i predstavnika KfW banke hidroelektrani Rama ............................................................................14 Primjena novih Općih uvjeta i Pravilnika o priključcima ....................16 HE Mostarsko Blato u izgradnji .........................................................17 str. 7 Uspješno provedena
    [Show full text]
  • Using GIS to Determine Wind Energy Potential in Minnesota, USA Zihan
    Using GIS to Determine Wind Energy Potential in Minnesota, USA Zihan Yang Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, Winona, MN 55987 Keywords: GIS, Wind Energy, Terrain Elevation, Multi-Criteria, Spatial Analysis Abstract Wind power is an alternative to fossil fuels. It is plentiful, renewable, widely distributed, clean, produces no greenhouse gas emissions during operation and uses relatively little land. Recent studies indicate that Minnesota has plentiful wind energy potential including the possibility to use wind to generate 25 times the electricity Minnesota used in 2010 (American Wind Energy Association, 2012a). This study evaluates the potential wind energy resources in Minnesota by analyzing technical, environmental, and political criteria for developing local renewable wind energy resources. The approach assesses suitable locations for exploring wind turbines energy sources with the aid of a geographic information system. The study considers local wind conditions and other restrictions such as terrain, land use, environment, and human activities. The model identifies areas that have an excellent suitability for future wind turbine placement in Minnesota. When it compares to the approximate estimations based solely on analysis of wind speed, this rule-based model may provide a more accurate method to evaluate wind energy in Minnesota. Introduction contributing cause of global warming is the emission of greenhouse gases (in The issue of global warming is particular carbon dioxide), mainly becoming a
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Maritimes Blizzard of February 18-19, 2004
    The Great Maritimes Blizzard of February 18-19, 2004 Chris Fogarty Atlantic Storm Prediction Centre, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Introduction On 18 February 2004 an intense low pressure system formed well south of Nova Scotia as cold air from eastern North America clashed with the relatively warm waters of the Gulf Stream. The storm moved northeastward passing south of Nova Scotia and over Sable Island. A vast area of heavy snow and high winds swept across Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and southeast New Brunswick bringing blizzard conditions and record snowfalls. Widespread amounts of 60 to 90 cm (24 to 36 inches, 2 to 3 feet) were experienced bringing Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island to a standstill. States of emergency were put into effect across these provinces in order for emergency officials to perform their duties and clean up the mammoth snowfall. It took days for many urban streets and highways to be cleared. 1. The Synoptic Situation A storm track map is shown in Fig. 1 with a time series of minimum sea level pressure in the inset based on analyses at the Maritimes Weather Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The storm formed approximately 200 km southeast of Cape Hatteras, NC at 00 UTC 18 February. It then moved to the northeast at 35-40 km/h, attaining its lowest sea level pressure of 959 mb at 18 UTC 19 February 250 km southeast of Halifax, NS (Fig. 2). Fig. 1. Storm track and time series of minimum sea level pressure. 1 Fig. 2. Sea level pressure analysis of the storm at maximum intensity.
    [Show full text]
  • DYNAMIC COASTS in a CHANGING CLIMATE Lead Authors: David E
    CHAPTER 2: DYNAMIC COASTS IN A CHANGING CLIMATE Lead Authors: David E. Atkinson (University of Victoria), Donald L. Forbes (Natural Resources Canada) and Thomas S. James (Natural Resources Canada) Contributing Authors: Nicole J. Couture (Natural Resources Canada) and Gavin K. Manson (Natural Resources Canada) Recommended Citation: Atkinson, D.E., Forbes, D.L. and James, T.S. (2016): Dynamic coasts in a changing climate; in Canada’s Marine Coasts in a Changing Climate, (ed.) D.S. Lemmen, F.J. Warren, T.S. James and C.S.L. Mercer Clarke; Government of Canada, Ottawa, ON, p. 27-68. Chapter 2 | DYNAMIC COASTS IN A CHANGING CLIMATE 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 29 4.3 PROJECTIONS OF SEA-LEVEL CHANGE IN CANADA 51 2 COASTAL VARIABILITY 29 4.3.1 PROJECTIONS OF RELATIVE SEA-LEVEL CHANGE 51 2.1 GEOLOGICAL SETTING 30 4.3.2 EXTREME WATER LEVELS 52 2.2 COASTAL PROCESSES 33 4.3.3 SEA-LEVEL PROJECTIONS 2.2.1 EROSION AND SHORELINE RETREAT 35 BEYOND 2100 54 2.2.2 CONTROLS ON RATES OF COASTAL CHANGE 36 5 COASTAL RESPONSE TO SEA-LEVEL RISE 3 CHANGING CLIMATE 38 AND CLIMATE CHANGE 54 3.1 DRIVERS OF CHANGE 38 5.1 PHYSICAL RESPONSE 54 3.2 CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CHANGE 40 5.2 ECOLOGICAL RESPONSE 57 3.3 CLIMATE DETERMINANTS 41 5.2.1 COASTAL SQUEEZE 57 3.4 TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS 42 5.2.2 COASTAL DUNES 57 3.4.1 TRENDS 42 5.2.3 COASTAL WETLANDS, TIDAL FLATS AND SHALLOW COASTAL WATERS 59 3.4.2 PROJECTIONS 43 3.5 STORMS AND SEA ICE 43 5.3 VISUALIZATION OF COASTAL FLOODING 60 3.5.1 STORMS 43 3.5.2 SEA ICE 44 6 SUMMARY AND SYNTHESIS 60 3.5.3 CHANGES IN STORM
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Halifax Harbour Adaptation Measures Can Be Incrementally Adjusted As New Information Becomes Available
    i t y i fa x a l P a l h ional Munici eg r Photo courtesy of Planning for sea-level rise in halifax harbour Adaptation measures can be incrementally adjusted as new information becomes available Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM), the capital of Nova Scotia, is Atlantic Canada’s largest city. The municipality covers more than 5500 km2 and has a population of more than 390 000. Halifax Harbour, at the heart of HRM, is a major seaport with significant industrial, military and municipal infrastructure. Rising sea level, along with increased storm intensity and associated waves and storm surges, presents risks to damaging storms residents, property and infrastructure in coastal areas of In recent years, Halifax has experienced frequent extreme HRM. Following extreme weather events in September weather, including several major storms that caused 2003 and February 2004, HRM launched ClimateSMART extensive erosion and flood damage. Most notable was (Sustainable Mitigation & Adaptation Risk Toolkit) to help Hurricane Juan in September 2003, a “once-in-a-century” mainstream climate change mitigation and adaptation into event. This Category 2 hurricane made landfall just west municipal planning and decision making. ClimateSMART of Halifax and tracked across central Nova Scotia and initiated discussion of climate change and spurred further Prince Edward Island, leaving a trail of damage to property, adaptation action. infrastructure and the environment (cost estimated at In August 2006, the HRM Council adopted the Regional $200 million). A few months later, in February 2004, the Municipal Planning Strategy, an integrated land use severe winter blizzard that became known as “White Juan” planning guide for future development.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Effect of Visualization Tool Exposure on Local-Level Stakeholder Perceptions on Climate Change Adaptation
    Examining the Effect of Visualization Tool Exposure on Local-level Stakeholder Perceptions on Climate Change Adaptation by Maliha Majeed A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Geography Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Maliha Majeed 2015 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT Vulnerabilities of human communities, driven by environmental, social, economic, and political dynamics, vary across geographical and social regions. Coastal communities are considered to be among those greatest at risk from climate impacts. To cope with these impacts, communities must assess existing vulnerabilities and adaptive capacities, and begin to adapt. Currently, community-based research often focuses on identifying vulnerabilities and possible adaptations, but rarely examines how local-level stakeholders perceive adaptation-based needs and potential action. This research study focuses on Lennox Island, in Prince Edward Island and the Town of Lockeport, in Nova Scotia to examine how two innovative visualization tools, CLIVE and AdaptNS, influence stakeholder perceptions on climate change adaptation. This study explores whether tool exposure changes perceptions of awareness and priorities for potential action among local-level decision-makers and stakeholders. It further explores which aspects of the visualization tools resonate among local-level decision-makers. This research builds on existing vulnerability assessment information established through the Partnership for Canada-Caribbean Community Climate Change Adaptation (ParCA) research project and uses a methodological approach involving semi-structured interviews and community-based workshops with local-level decision-makers and community stakeholders, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Adaptation Home: Citizen Engagements with Climate Change at Home Site Scales in Ottawa and Halifax
    Bringing adaptation home: Citizen engagements with climate change at home site scales in Ottawa and Halifax by Magdalene Goemans A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2018 Magdalene Goemans ABSTRACT Climate change impacts are becoming increasingly evident in cities, generating hazards such as heatwaves and flooding events that may cause discomfort or trauma for residents. Climate change scholars suggest that measures undertaken on private lands provide a significant counterpart to public adaptation initiatives, and increasingly position the home site as an important scale of analysis within climate change research (Bichard & Kazmiercak, 2009; Jeffers, 2014; Pyhala et al., 2016; Wilson et al., 2014). Select scholars have also considered how municipalities may effectively engage with citizens to encourage greater home-based responses to climate-related hazards (Groulx et al., 2014; Hjerpe et al., 2014; Klein, 2014). This thesis explores citizen perspectives of climate change impacts, risk and opportunities for adaptation that are based at the scale of the urban home site in two mid- sized Canadian cities, Ottawa and Halifax. Through a qualitative research approach of discourse analysis, this thesis explores several distinct but related sub-themes: (1) how residents understand local places of climate change impacts and risk; (2) how residents engage with home site natures within
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 PEI State of Wildlife Report
    State of Wildlife Report 2007 1 State of Wildlife – 2007 Cover photo Tourism PEI, AnnMacNeill Photographer Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Background information ......................................1 1.1.1 Location ............................................1 1.1.2 Climate.............................................1 1.1.3 Geology and Soils ....................................1 1.1.4 Land Use ...........................................2 1.1.5 History of Wetlands in Prince Edward Island................3 1.1.6 Rivers and Streams ...................................4 2.0 Habitat 5 2.1 Status of Forests ...........................................5 2.1.1 Forest Inventory......................................5 2.1.2 Forest Communities...................................6 2.2 Status of Fish Habitat ........................................7 2.2.1 Impoundments and Fish Habitat .........................7 2.2.2 Fish Passage ........................................7 2.3 Status of Wetlands ..........................................8 2.3.1 Freshwater Wetlands ..................................8 2.3.2 Coastal Wetlands and Estuaries .........................8 2.4 Status of Sand Dunes ........................................9 2.5 Status of Public Land .......................................10 2.5.1 Public Ponds .......................................10 2.5.2 Provincial Forests ...................................11 2.5.3 Natural Areas .......................................11 2.5.4 Wildlife Management Areas ............................12 2.5.5
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    List of Extirpated, Endangered, Threatened and Rare Vascular Plants in Indiana: An Update James R. Aldrich, John A. Bacone and Michael A. Homoya Indiana Department of Natural Resources Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Introduction The status of Indiana's rarest vascular plants was last revised in 1981 by Bacone et al. (3). Since that publication much additional field work has been undertaken and accordingly, our knowledge of Indiana's rarest plant species has greatly increased. The results of some of this extensive field work have been discussed by Homoya (9) and Homoya and Abrell (10) for southern Indiana and by Aldrich et al. (1) for northern Indiana. Wilhelm's (17) discussion on the special vegetation of the Indiana Dunes Na- tional Lakeshore has also provided us with a much clearer understanding of the status of rare, threatened and endangered plants in northwest Indiana. Unfortunately, the number of species thought to be extinct in Indiana has more than tripled. Previous reports (2, 3) indicated that 26 species were extirpated in In- diana. The work that has been conducted to date leads us to believe that as many as 90 species may be extirpated. Without a doubt, the single factor most responsible for this extirpation has been and continues to be, the destruction of natural habitat. Compilation and Selection Criteria Lists of Bacone and Hedge (2), Bacone et al. (3), Barnes (4), Crankshaw (5) and Crovello (6) were consulted and provide the foundation for this report. New additions to this list include state records discovered since Deam (7) and a number of recommen- dations from field botanists.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Document, November 2005, Was Followed to Determine Potential Species of Concern for the Project Site
    Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................1 1.1 Registration Requirements ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Proponent Information ........................................................................................................1 1.2.1 Business Principles and Policies.............................................................................3 1.3 Context and Background.....................................................................................................5 1.3.1 Historic Coal Mining in Sydney Coal Field............................................................5 1.3.2 Exploration Agreement and License.......................................................................6 1.4 The Project ..........................................................................................................................7 1.4.1 Project Location and the Resource Block ...............................................................7 1.4.2 Land Holdings.........................................................................................................8 1.4.3 Project Parameters ..................................................................................................8 1.4.4 Existing and Proposed Site Infrastructure...............................................................9 1.4.5 Completion of Tunnel Dewatering .........................................................................9
    [Show full text]