James Arthur And

Noreen 3-D - FEATURE - Part I of IV James Arthur and His “Temple of Time”: A Cautionary Tale for Collector-Donors and Their Beneficiaries by Jeanne Schinto Photos courtesy Maude Arthur Brown Family Archive f asked to name an example of the thwarting of what is called, in philan- How did this scuttling Ithropic and legalistic circles, “donor of a bequest happen? intent,” many people in the collecting world would cite what was perhaps the most widely publicized case in recent as chapters in a straightforward cautionary tale pertinent memory. I’m referring to the protracted to all would-be donors and their families. But the reality is and deeply polarizing dispute over the much more nuanced. Forces of cultural and societal change art collection of Albert Barnes (1872- came into play as the Arthur gift made its curtailed journey 1951) and the outcome: its eventual move into the so-called forever. They included such things as the from its longtime home in a residential gargantuan growth in New York real-estate values that altered neighborhood in Merion, Pennsylvania, to the socioeconomic contours of the city; the explosion and new quarters in downtown Philadelphia. complete remaking of higher education; and the evolution Yet there are scores of other little-known in ideas about the purpose of institutional collections, the instances of deceased benefactors’ wishes role of their curators, and the choices of objects we should for their collections being ignored, or shouldn’t preserve. Particularly relevant, curatorial neglected, subverted, or jettisoned by their ideas about mechanical devices like clocks and watches beneficiaries over time. metamorphosed completely. And so while the ignominious What happened to the legacy of James fate of one man’s horological bequest is the ostensible focus Arthur (1842-1930) of Brooklyn, New of this four-part series of articles, more complicated themes York, at the hands of New York University will necessarily be explored. (NYU) is a good case in point. In 1925 The first part will present biographical information about Arthur bequeathed his horological the benefactor, tell why he chose NYU for his largess, and collection—more than 1900 sundials, explore what in hindsight were the gift’s golden years, i.e., James Arthur in 1885 at age 43, the year he established his business, hourglasses, clocks, watches, and a related the 1930s. The second part will examine why, between the Arthur & Company Machine Works. A popular photographic trick of library—to NYU. When he died five years World War II era and the mid-1960s, the collection lost the period made use of a so-called duplicator, which allowed a studio later, the university got an endowment of its champions, such as they were by then, and its initial photographer to create an image of two Arthurs. He is pictured with a approximately $111,000 for its upkeep. dismantling occurred. It will describe the missteps, missed walking cane from his collection. An equivalent gift today would be about opportunities, and the inevitabilities. The third part will $1.4 million. For the next four decades the discuss the legal interventions of the 1980s, clarifying objects were under the care of a succession bits of speculation that have been floating around the of appointed curators, all but two of them horological community for years about the Arthur legacy affiliated with NYU as a professor, former and its demise. The fourth and final part will be an professor, emeritus professor, alumnus, assessment of the current situation as it pertains to Arthur or a combination thereof. There were objects. It will give an accounting of where many of the exhibits, acquisitions of more clocks and collection’s best timekeepers are today. It will explain why watches, donations of still more by other items with Arthur provenance appear on the secondary collectors, publications, and a lecture market. It will conclude with a review of the status of the series on “Time and Its Mysteries.” One of James Arthur lecture series, one of the few ways that his the curators even had an architect produce legacy is still being honored today. a sketch for a “Temple of Time,” i.e., a Irving Husted Berg (1878-1941), James Arthur’s son-in- stand-alone Neoclassical building designed law, was the one who convinced him that NYU was the ideal to permanently house the collection at place for his collection. It was the Roaring Twenties. The NYU’s (now erstwhile) uptown campus in United States was in the midst of a period of unparalleled University Heights in the Bronx. growth, and so was NYU, where Berg, an ordained minister An architect’s sketch for the never-built Temple of Time. In the early 1980s, however, a court of the Dutch Reformed Church, was university chaplain. ruled that the collection could and should Arthur was enticed with talk of plans for a museum of mechanics, metalworking, woodworking, and machine design, and be dismembered and dispersed. Now timekeeping to be established on the school’s growing he became an expert in gear cutting. numbering close to 3000 objects, it went University Heights campus, with his collection as its core. According to some versions of his life story, he was a pupil of in three different directions, while a And yet, right from the start, there were both financial and astronomer William Herschel’s grandson, Alexander S. Herschel, smattering remains at NYU. The most logistical problems with that vision. On February 25, 1926, who was known as a natural philosopher, forerunner of the modern significant portion—indeed, the bulk of just a few months after Arthur signed the papers to make scientist. Either from him or other teachers, or as a result of his own it, about 1900 objects—was given to the his gift official, NYU chancellor Elmer Ellsworth Brown predilections, Arthur developed a philosophical bent along with a National Association of Watch and Clock (1861-1934) wrote to Berg apologetically: “Now that you lifelong interest in the cosmos. No ordinary collector of clocks and Collectors, headquartered in Columbia, have succeeded, to the gratification of all of us, in securing watches, he was captivated by the mystery of time itself. Pennsylvania. The second-largest portion, to the University the James Arthur collection of clocks and In 1871, at age 29, James Arthur moved to the United States. The some 650 objects, was gifted to the watches, your patience must be nearly at the end because husband and father of three called for the family to join him shortly Smithsonian Institution in Washington, of our inability hitherto to make arrangements for the safe after he got settled in New Jersey. Arthur worked as foreman for the D.C. (Twenty years earlier, that part of removal and installation of the collection at the Heights.” Steam Pump & Valve Works of Adam Carr in New York City. In the collection had been moved there on The problem, Brown said, was “the tedious problem of 1878 he started his own machine works, taking Carr’s son William a permanent loan arrangement.) A third, securing special funds to move the collection.”1 as a partner. Seven years later, the partnership of Arthur & Carr was small portion was sold to a private entity, University Heights was just ten miles from the New dissolved, and Arthur & Company was established on John Street in a the Time Museum of Rockford, Illinois. York suburb of New Rochelle, where Arthur, a widower section of Manhattan that became part of Brooklyn when New York’s (Those 37 items were subsequently resold who had reached his early 80s and was in declining health, borough system was created in 1898. after the Time Museum closed in 1999.) had gone to live with Berg and his wife, Arthur’s youngest Besides clocks and watches, Arthur also collected firearms, ivory, Items from the fourth and final portion—a child, Bessie (1875-1948). The collection was still at glass, china, furniture, and walking canes. One of his canes was made selection of about a dozen clocks, mostly Arthur’s house, a mansion on Brooklyn’s fashionable and of shark vertebrae, perhaps by a sailor. Another was a “deacon’s cane” tall-case examples—are currently exclusive Clinton Hill, where men who had made fortunes with a hidden vial designed to hold an alcoholic nip. A third was an being used by NYU to decorate various in wallpaper, coffee, oil, flour, and lace had been his Irish shillelagh, which Arthur, who became a U.S. citizen in 1876 administrators’ offices and other spaces neighbors. Arthur’s own fortune had come from the metals while still living in New Jersey, often carried in New York City’s St. around the university’s downtown campus business, specifically the Arthur & Company Machine Patrick’s Day parade. on Greenwich Village’s Washington Works, established in 1885, the same year he started Arthur’s business was an undeniable success. In 1893, less than a Square or are in storage. NYU also got to collecting timepieces in earnest. decade after opening the business, he bought his own building at 188- keep the library and the endowment. As a boy Arthur had collected sundials; he’d constructed 190 Front Street. Four years later he was able to leave the operation How did this scuttling of a bequest some too. This was in Ireland (in a part known since 1921 in the charge of his sons, John and Daniel, and take a world tour by happen? Who is to blame? Was it as Northern Ireland), then Scotland, where his parents himself, collecting clocks and watches all over Europe and in parts preventable? Events that took place in the had been born and where the family moved when he was of Asia.

Load more