The Serotonergic System in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Understanding deep brain stimulation in obsessive compulsive disorder: A preclinical study into the mechanism of action and behaviour van Dijk, A. Publication date 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van Dijk, A. (2013). Understanding deep brain stimulation in obsessive compulsive disorder: A preclinical study into the mechanism of action and behaviour. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 Chapter The serotonergic2 system in obsessive compulsive disorder Addy van Dijk, Andre Klompmakers, Damiaan Denys Handbook of the behavioral neurobiology of serotonin (2010) Amsterdam: Academic Press Chapter 2 Abstract Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric disorder consisting of obsessions and compulsions. Over the past two decades, it has been suggested that OCD might be related to the functioning of brain serotonin systems, mainly because of the anti-obsessional efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Though the efficacy of SSRIs suggests a role of the serotonergic system in OCD, the exact function of serotonin is still unclear. Is the serotonergic system implicated in the pathophysiology of OCD, or is it implicated in the treatment effect in OCD? Do SSRIs compensate for a fundamental abnormality of the serotonergic system, or do SSRIs modulate an intact serotonergic system to compensate for another neurotransmitter mechanism? This chapter reviews five lines of evidence that have been cited in support of the serotonin hypothesis: (1) pharmacotherapy, (2) pharmacologic challenge studies, (3) receptor binding studies, (4) genetic association studies, and (5) animal models. 20 The serotonergic system in obsessive compulsive disorder 2.1 Introduction Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric disorder which consists of obsessions and compulsions. Obsessions are unwanted ideas or impulses that repeatedly well up in the mind, such as persistent fears to harm a loved one, an unreasonable concern with becoming contaminated or an excessive need to do things correctly or perfectly. Compulsions are repetitive behaviours or rituals such as washing and checking, counting, mentally repeating phrases, list making, or endlessly rearranging objects. Over the past two decades, it has been suggested that OCD might be related to the functioning of brain serotonin systems, mainly because of the anti-obsessional efficacy of SSRIs. The serotonin hypothesis originated from the observed efficacy of SSRIs in OCD, compared to inefficacy of selective noradrenergic and dopaminergic reuptake inhibitors, suggesting a specific abnormality of the serotonergic system in OCD (Baumgarten and Grozdanovic1998). However, the exact function of serotonin in OCD is still unclear. This chapter provides an overview of the evidence supporting a role for the serotonergic system in OCD. It reviews five lines of evidence that have been cited in support of the serotonin hypothesis: (1) pharmacotherapeutic studies, (2) pharmacotherapy, (3) receptor binding studies, (4) genetic association studies, and (5) animal models. 2.2 Pharmacotherapy A common method to unravel the pathophysiology of a disorder in psychiatry is to study the mechanism of action of effective drug therapy. The cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for OCD is serotonin reuptake inhibition, either with clomipramine or with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Over the past 25 years, a number of double blind, randomized, placebo controlled studies in OCD have confirmed the efficacy of clomipramine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine and citalopram. Efficacy of drug trials in OCD is commonly expressed in absolute changes of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores. The Y-BOCS is a clinician rated 10-item scale with a total range of 0 to 40 that measures severity of obsessions and compulsions (Goodman et al.1989a; Goodman et al.1989b). In many cases, patients are classified as responders when their scores on the Y-BOCS decrease by 25 to 35%. The efficacy of clomipramine was established in more than 10 placebo-controlled trials. In a recent meta-analysis, clomipramine shows a net improvement (difference) compared with placebo of 8.20 points on the Y-BOCS (Ackerman and Greenland2002). Responder rates to clomipramine vary between 40-50% of patients. Though in some cases low doses of clomipramine over a short period of time may result in significant improvement of symptoms, 21 Chapter 2 clomipramine treatment should last at least 10 to 12 weeks in a dose of 250-300 mg/day to demonstrate a full effect. Clomipramine has never been tested in a controlled fixed-dose study to assess optimal doses. Fluvoxamine is superior to placebo in 4 placebo-controlled trials and equipotent to clomipramine in 5 comparison trials (Dell’osso et al.2005). The pooled difference of fluvoxamine compared with placebo in these trials was 4.8 points on the Y-BOCS. Fluvoxamine has never been examined in a fixed dose trial, but appears to be efficacious from 150-300 mg/day. Fluoxetine is effective in 3 placebo-controlled trials and equipotent to clomipramine in 2 comparison trials. The pooled difference on the Y-BOCS of fluoxetine compared with placebo was 1.6 points (Ackerman and Greenland2002). Responder rates to fluoxetine vary between 25-30% of patients. Sertraline was effective in 4 placebo- controlled trials and equipotent to clomipramine in 1 comparison trial. The pooled difference of sertraline compared with placebo in these trials was 2.5 points on the Y-BOCS (Ackerman and Greenland2002). Although no correlation was found of sertraline plasma levels with treatment outcome, in a large multicenter trial, sertraline 50 mg/day and 200 mg/day were superior to placebo whereas 100 mg/day was not. For a long time, paroxetine was shown to be effective in just one published placebo-controlled trial and equipotent to clomipramine in the same trial (Ackerman and Greenland2002; Zohar and Judge1996; Ninan2003). The difference of paroxetine compared with placebo was 3.1 points on the Y-BOCS. Forty and 60 mg/day doses were significantly better than placebo whereas 20 mg was not. The efficacy of citalopram in OCD recently was established in a placebo-controlled study including 401 patients who were randomized to receive citalopram 20, 40 or 60 mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks (Montgomery et al.2001). The difference of citalopram compared with placebo was 3.6 points on the Y-BOCS. The highest responder rate (65%), defined as 25% improvement in Y-BOCS entry score, was observed in the 60 mg group compared with 52% and 57.4% in the 40 mg and 20 mg groups, respectively. Surprisingly, the responder rate on placebo was 36.6% with a mean decrease on the Y-BOCS of 5.6 points. This high improvement rate on placebo, uncommon in OCD, has been explained as a result of inclusion of milder, atypical cases, in which spontaneous remission is more frequent. Patients with longer duration of OCD, more severe OCD symptoms or previous SSRI use were less likely to be responders to citalopram, whereas patients who received adequate medication doses for sufficient periods of time were more likely to be responders (Stein et al.2001). In a small study, clinical response does not appear to be related to citalopram plasma concentrations (Bareggi et al.2004). The efficacy of clomipramine and five SSRIs has been established with placebo-controlled trials, but are clomipramine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram and fluoxetine equally effective (Soomro et al.2008)? Meta-analyses using statistical methods to pool 22 The serotonergic system in obsessive compulsive disorder samples from different studies may answer this question offering a precise estimate of the treatment effect from separate drug trials. Consistent with previous meta-analyses, Ackerman et al recently confirmed that clomipramine is more effective than SSRIs in placebo-controlled trials (Ackerman and Greenland2002). For 7 clomipramine trials, the net Y-BOCS decrease compared with placebo was 8.19, whereas for 4 fluvoxamine trials the net Y-BOCS decrease was 4.84, for 3 fluoxetine trials 1.61, and for 4 sertraline trials 2.47. It is worth noting, however, that the largest effect sizes for clomipramine were found in early studies and have not been as clearly replicated in more recent studies comparing it with SSRIs. Moreover, on the long term, drop-out rates in clomipramine-treated patients are higher than SSRI-treated patients. In another meta-analysis which included 32 studies covering a total number of 3588 OCD patients, again, clomipramine had the largest effect size (1.55) versus 0.81 for fluoxetine to 1.36 for sertraline (Eddy et al.2004). This meta-analysis also demonstrated that two-thirds of the patients who completed a medication trial improved. Across all active treatments, the mean Y-BOCS decrease was 7.1 resulting in a mean post-treatment Y-BOCS score of 17.9 whereas for placebo conditions the Y-BOCS decrease was 1.8. Clearly, in effectiveness, clomipramine is superior to all the SSRIs. In practice, however, the choice of a drug also depends on side effect profile and potential for drug interactions.