DOCSLIB.ORG

Manage Grasses Invasive.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manage Grasses Invasive.Pdf Managing Invasive Grasses by Prescribed Herbivory Draft – February 15, 2006 James W. Bartolome, Craig Thomsen, and Sheila Barry (A condensed version of this paper was presented at the Society for Range Management meeting, February 15, 2006, Vancouver, Canada) 1. Introduction (JB) Prescription grazing is the application of livestock grazing prescriptions (i.e. specified grazing intensities, timings, frequencies, and degrees of selectivity) to purposely achieve natural resource objectives. Livestock performance is a secondary goal in prescribed livestock grazing. This paper discusses some general principles and examples of the use of prescribed herbivory to manage invasive grasses. Most of the prescription grazing work has been done with broad-leaved weeds. Although grasses are important components of rangeland ecosystems and important invasive weeds, relatively little work has been done on specific grass taxa. Grasses possess a suite of biological characteristics that may require a different approach to planning and understanding control. 2. Grass Biology (JB) Grasses probably arose in the southern hemisphere as Gondwanaland broke up in the late cretaceous. By the Miocene grassland ecosystems were widespread, the only biome dominated by a single plant family (Soderstrom et al 1987). Although several plant families have more species, none are as widespread (grasses are the only angiosperm family found on all seven continents) or as important for people. Most human food calories are consumed from the grasses maize, wheat, and rice. Grasses are a large (more than 7500 species) monophyletic family of monocots with a suite of important features reflecting common ancestry (Kellogg 2000). They have distinctive wind-pollinated or apomictic flowers and a modular growth form. Grass stems, termed culms, can best be thought of as an assembly of phytomers, which consist of a node, internode, sheath, and blade. The phytomer contains intercalary meristems at the nodes and base of the blade (Briske 1991). The myriad of variations on the phytomer theme is an important aspect of grass diversity and should allow development of some common principles related to prescribed grazing. The morphology of the phytomer and its intercalary meristems allows rapid replacement of aboveground parts removed by grazing or fire and hence grazing tolerance. Grasses have evolved C4 photosynthetic pathways independently several times, which increases the efficiency of energy capture at high temperatures and under conditions of low carbon dioxide concentrations, and improves water use efficiency. Grasses generally do not produce secondary toxic compounds and instead avoid and tolerate grazing through morphological mechanisms (Gould and Shaw 1983). Because grasses dominate extensive ecosystems, they are often linked to herbivore evolution and putative adaptive characteristics like hypsodontia, complex digestive systems, and forage preference. Grazers can be linked to grasses in an evolutionary context to greater degree than to other plant categories. The impact of the different grazing species on grasses and possibility for control should be defined in terms of intensity, frequency, distribution, and timing of defoliation (Heady and Child 1994). These effects will differ by target species. Grasses have been around a long time and form an important part of widespread natural ecosystems. They play roles ranging from dominant species in equilibrium – type communities to invaders and colonizers in highly disturbed and/or non-equilibrium – type systems. The distinction between equilibrium and non-equilibrium systems can be very important to the manager because the dynamics of non-equilibrium systems are primarily driven by abiotic factors. Grazing and its management have little lasting effect on these communities. “Exotic” is a political term normally contrasted to “native” or “indigenous” or “naturally occurring” that may be difficult to apply consistently. Often the term exotic is coupled with the term “invasive” to describe weedy problem species. These terms need careful definition and placement in the context of an appropriate model for vegetation dynamics. A weed is defined by its situation as perceived by the manager. 3. Grazers and grazing impacts (JB/CT) The primary producers in ecosystems fix energy, primarily in the form of carbon compounds, which is then transferred through trophic levels to support consumer organisms. The first transfer is to primary consumers (herbivores) through herbivory. This complex interaction is well-understood for many systems. When considering the effects of large herbivores on the system it is useful to separate the process of effects of herbivory into intensity, timing, frequency, and duration (Heady and Child 1994). Intensity is defined as the proportion of forage (herbage available for grazing or browsing) removed. It may be measured in a variety of ways, but for grasses it is usually determined by measuring the amount of above-ground phytomass either with or without grazing or before and after a grazing period. Because intensity is strongly linked to plant responses to defoliation and the ability to compensate for loss of herbage, it is a very important aspect of grazing management (Richards 1993). The timing, frequency, and duration of grazing also are important in determining the impacts of grazing on target plant species. These factors often interact with changes in animal preference and palatability that can become keys to developing grazing prescriptions. Animals affect rangeland systems apart from the direct impacts of herbivory (Stuth 1991). They redistribute nutrients, affect soil properties through physical impacts, trample uneaten forage, and affect water quality. They serve as important vectors for moving plants and other organisms. On the animal side, Walker (1995) presented some general grazing management research ideas that are relevant to invasive plant suppression, including grasses. He discusses how grazing will be conducted on extensive rangelands in the future, stating that successful management will be based on the ability to accomplish three objectives: 1) control what animals graze, 2) control where they graze, and 3) monitoring the impact on both the environment and the animal. Among Walker’s research suggestions are genetic manipulation of livestock to select diets that are most appropriate for the environment and management goals of the grazier including: 1) classical selection and animal breeding techniques, 2) inserting a specific gene into a breed, i.e., a sheep gene that can handle Senecio jacobaea might be used in cattle since sheep have an enzymatic system that allows them to detoxify this species, 3) Genetically modifying microbial symbionts for ruminants, tailored to certain foraging environments that would allow them to digest certain materials. Some of this is already being used or tested. 5. Species list of important North American invasive grasses (adapted primarily from www.fs.fed.us/database/feis) Aegilops cylindricus (goatgrass) Aegilops triuncialis (barbed goatgrass) Agropyron desertorum (desert wheatgrass) Agropyron cristatum (crested wheatgrass) Arundo donax (giant reed) Brachypodium distachyon (false brome) Bromus hordeacous (soft chess) Bromus inermis (smooth brome) Bromus japonicus (Japanese brome) Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass) Dactylis glomerata (orchard grass) Echinochloa crus-gali (barnyard grass) Eragrostis curvula (weeping lovegrass) Eragrostis lehmianii (Lehman lovegrass) Elytrigia repens (quackgrass) Festuca arundinacea (tall fescue) Pennisetum setaceum (fountain grass) Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass) Phalaris aquatica (Harding grass) Poa pratensis (Kentucky bluegrass) Sorghum halepense (Johnson grass) Spartina alterniflora (European beachgrass) Taeniatherum caput-medusae (medusahead) Below is a template for evaluating the possible role of prescription grazing in control of common grass species. The table lists key characteristics necessary for designing a management approach. This information will only rarely be available and it will usually be necessary to use an adaptive management approach with close monitoring of plant responses. Invasive Where a Growth Reproductive Invasiveness Seed bank Seed Season & Frequency Intensity Kind & Stock Demonstrated Citation grass problem form strategy longevity volume growth class of density successful species stage for livestock control with grazing P.G. Bromus Rangeland annual Seed high 1 year high EV, Twice high C & S high yes Moseley tectorum MV, S 1999 Aegilops Rangeland annual Seed High 2+ medium LV, B single high C high no Betts triuncialis 2002 Spartina alterniflora Arundo donax Agropyron desertorum Crop, irrigated pasture, riparian, rangeland A or P, WS or CS, SF or BG V or S (Vegetative or Seed) H, M or L (High, Medium or Low) 0, 1, or 2+ years W, Sp, S or F (Winter, Spring, Summer or Fall); EV, MV, LV, B, F, S (Early-vegetative, Mid-vegetative, Late-vegetative, Boot, Flower, Senescence) Year and within year S and C (Sheep and cattle) 6. Examples (successes) (CT) Relatively few research papers report the effective use of prescription grazing to control the invasive grass species on the above list. Perhaps the best documentation reports Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) reduction from livestock grazing, especially sheep. Cheatgrass is an annual grass introduced to the Intermountain region from Eurasia. It spread rapidly onto rangelands in the early 20th century and now dominates many millions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Plants in Southern Forests
    Invasive Plants in Southern Forests United States Department of Agriculture A Field Guide for the Identification of Invasive PlantsSLIGHTLY inREVISED NOVEMBERSouthern 2015 Forests United States Forest Service Department Southern Research Station James H. Miller, Erwin B. Chambliss, and Nancy J. Loewenstein of Agriculture General Technical Report SRS–­­119 Authors: James H. Miller, Emeritus Research Ecologist, and Erwin B. Chambliss, Research Technician, Forest Available without charge from the Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Southern Research Station, Auburn University, AL 36849; and Southern Research Station Nancy J. Loewenstein, Research Fellow and Alabama Cooperative Extension System Specialist for Also available online at Forest Invasive Plants, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, AL 36849. www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/35292 and invasive.org, or as a free download for iPhones and iPads at the AppStore Front Cover Upper left—Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) infestation that developed from dormant seed in the soil seed bank after a forest thinning operation. Upper right—Kudzu (Pueraria montana) infestation within the urban-wildland interface. Lower left—Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and dormant kudzu invading and replacing a pine- hardwood stand. Lower right—Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) infestation under mature slash pine (Pinus elliottii). Funding support for all printings provided by the Southern Research Station, Insect, Disease, and Invasive Plants Research Work Unit, and Forest Health Protection, Southern Region, Asheville, NC. First Printed April 2010 Slightly Revised February 2012 Revised August 2013 Reprinted January 2015 Slightly Revised November 2015 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 www.srs.fs.usda.gov i A Field Guide for the Identification of Invasive Plants in Southern Forests James H.
    [Show full text]
  • Elymus Elymoides Crested Wheatgrass Agropyron Desertorum
    Reclamation of Pipeline Right-Of-Ways on Rangelands Charlie D. Clements, James A. Young and Dan N. Harmon Introduction USDA, Agricultural Research Service 920 Valley Rd. Reno NV 89512 [email protected] In the mid 1990’s a large diameter natural gas pipeline was constructed across western Nevada. Reclamation of such right-of-ways are challenging because of both the severity and the linear nature of the disturbance. During construction, pipelines and equipment (Fig. 1) are highly visible at a landscape level to the general public, therefore attracting concerns and reclamation suggestions from a host of interest groups. The construction contractor invited us to set up plots and conduct research concerning the reclamation of their pipeline disturbance. Table 1. Plant material used in the pipeline reclamation effort. Common Name _____ Scientific Name Antelope Bitterbrush Purshia tridentata Figure 3. Lower pipeline site 6 years after the initial reclamation seeding. Basin Big Sagebrush Artemisia tridentata Basin Wildrye Leymus cinereus Big Bluegrass Poa secunda Bluebunch Wheatgrass Pseudoroegneria spicata Figure 1. Heavy equipment used in pipeline construction is very visible as well as the disturbance. Bottlebrush Squirreltail Elymus elymoides Crested Wheatgrass Agropyron desertorum Desert Needlegrass Achnatherum speciosum Idaho Fescue Festuca idahoensis ‘Immigrant’ Forage Kochia Kochia prostrata Indian Ricegrass Achnatherum hymenoides Needle-and-Threadgrass Hesperostipa comata Shadscale Atriplex confortifolia Thurber’s Needlegrass Achnatherum thurberianum Figure 4. Antelope bitterbrush, basin big sagebrush, ‘Immigrant’ forage kochia,and needle-and-thread grass were some of the planted species that successfully established. Figure 2. Pipeline site the first year after reclamation seeding effort. Results and Discussion It is a common practice to rest sites from livestock grazing for 2 years following such efforts, but Methods this is hard to do following pipeline disturbances because the disturbances are so narrow and linear in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • USSR (North Caucasus, Kazakhstan Republic) July 18-August 31, 1977 U.S
    PLANT GERMPLASM COLLECTION REPORT USDA-ARS FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY LOGAN, UTAH Foreign Travel to: USSR (North Caucasus, Kazakhstan Republic) July 18-August 31, 1977 U.S. Participants Douglas R. Dewey - Research Geneticist (deceased) contact Jack Staub USDA-Agricultural Research Service Logan, Utah U.S.A. A. Perry Plummer USDA-Forest Service Provo, Utah U.S.A. Laurie Law (Interpreter) USDA-ARS-IPD Washington, DC 20250 GERMPLASM ACCESSIONS Country Visited: Soviet Union -North Caucasus (Stavropol Kray) -Kazakstan Republic (Tselinograd Oblast) (Alma Ata Oblast) (Dzhambul Oblast) (Chimkent Oblast) Period of Travel: July 18 - August 31, 1977 Moscow: July 18-19 Stavropol: July 20 - August 6 Tselinograd: August 7-11 Alma Ata: August 12-16 Dzhambul: August 17-21 Chimkent: August 22-28 Moscow: August 29-31 Purpose of Trip: 1) To collect germplasm of grasses, legumes, forbs, and shrubs from natural large sites in the USSR for possible use on U.S. rangelands; 2) to establish contracts with Soviet botanists and plant breeders for the purpose of negotiating future seed exchanges. SUMMARY A 45-day plant collection expedition to the USSR by D. R. Dewey, A. P. Plummer, and Laurie Law netted about 1,100 seed collections of range-forage grasses, legumes, forbs, and shrubs. The Soviets provided land transportation and an escort of several scientists and administrators throughout the trip. The collectors were usually housed in hotels and made daily trips to collect native vegetation in surrounding areas usually within a 100-km radius. Almost 3 weeks (July 20 - August 6) were spent in the Stavropol Kray in the northern foothills of the Caucasus Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This Is a Consolidated List Of
    RWKiger 26 Jul 18 Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 24 and 25. In citations of articles, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix "a"; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with "b". Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes. Aares, E., M. Nurminiemi, and C. Brochmann. 2000. Incongruent phylogeographies in spite of similar morphology, ecology, and distribution: Phippsia algida and P. concinna (Poaceae) in the North Atlantic region. Pl. Syst. Evol. 220: 241–261. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges. = Abhandlungen herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft. Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot. = Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica. Acta Horti Bot. Prag. = Acta Horti Botanici Pragensis. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. = Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica. [Shokubutsu Bunrui Chiri.] Acta Phytotax.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Plant List
    APPENDIX J NATIVE & INVASIVE PLANT LIST The following tables capture the referenced plants, native and invasive species, found throughout this document. The Wildlife Action Plan Team elected to only use common names for plants to improve the readability, particular for the general reader. However, common names can create confusion for a variety of reasons. Common names can change from region-to-region; one common name can refer to more than one species; and common names have a way of changing over time. For example, there are two widespread species of greasewood in Nevada, and numerous species of sagebrush. In everyday conversation generic common names usually work well. But if you are considering management activities, landscape restoration or the habitat needs of a particular wildlife species, the need to differentiate between plant species and even subspecies suddenly takes on critical importance. This appendix provides the reader with a cross reference between the common plant names used in this document’s text, and the scientific names that link common names to the precise species to which writers referenced. With regards to invasive plants, all species listed under the Nevada Revised Statute 555 (NRS 555) as a “Noxious Weed” will be notated, within the larger table, as such. A noxious weed is a plant that has been designated by the state as a “species of plant which is, or is likely to be, detrimental or destructive and difficult to control or eradicate” (NRS 555.05). To assist the reader, we also included a separate table detailing the noxious weeds, category level (A, B, or C), and the typical habitats that these species invade.
    [Show full text]
  • ALKALI SACATON (Sporobolus Airoides) Section 7.1.4, US ARMY CORPS of ENGINEERS WILDLIFE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MANUAL
    FlSH & WlLOUFE REFERENCE LIBRARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RESEARCH PROGRAM • TECHNICAL REPORT EL-86-37 ALKALI SACATON (Sporobolus airoides) Section 7.1.4, US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILDLIFE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MANUAL by Clinton H. Wasser Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 and Phillip L. Dittberner, Donald R. Dietz US Fish and Wildlife Service Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 • July 1986 Final Report Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Under EIRP Work Unit 31631 Monitored by Environmental Laboratory • US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station PO Box 631, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180-0631 Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE IForm Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OM8 No. 0704-0188 • Exp. Date: Jun 30, 1986 1a. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 1 b. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS Uncla<:<:ified 2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION I AVAILABILITY OF REPORT Approved for public release; 2b. DECLASSIFICATION I DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE distribution unlimited. 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) Technical Report EL-86-37 6a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL la. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION See reverse (If applicable) USAEWES Environmental Laboratorv 6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) See reverse PO Box 631 Vicksburg, MS 39180-0631 Ba. NAME OF FUNDING /SPONSORING Sb. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ORGANIZATION (If applicable) US Army Corps of Engineers Sc. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNIT ELEMENT NO. NO. NO. ACCESSION NO Washington, DC 20314-1000 EIRP 316'H 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotted Knapweed
    Spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa Lam) : water, nutrients, plant competition, bacteria, and the seed head fly (Urophora affinis Frnfd.) by Stephen Anthony Kearing A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology Montana State University © Copyright by Stephen Anthony Kearing (1996) Abstract: Spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam., is considered fay many to be the number one noxious weed in western Montana. A hydroponics study was conducted in Bozeman, MT to quantify water and nutrient uptake of spotted knapweed and two grass competitors. Spotted knapweed, western wheatgrass, Pascopymm smithii (Rydb.) Love, and a crested wheatgrass hybrid, Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaert X Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schult., were grown in a complete randomized block design, each in individual hydroponic drip systems with an inert rock wool media. The pots were weighed at each interval to estimate water use. Mean concentrations remaining in the system for nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium were regressed against mean cumulative water use for each treatment. Spotted knapweed and western wheatgrass had similar slopes for nitrogen and potassium concentrations that were significantly lower than crested wheatgrass (t-test, P < = 0.05), suggesting that knapweed and western wheatgrass absorb nitrogen and potassium more efficiently than crested wheatgrass. Conversely, crested wheatgrass had a significantly lower slope for concentrations of phosphorous remaining in the solution (t-test, P = 0.01), suggesting crested wheatgrass absorbs more phosphorous per ml water than western wheatgrass or spotted knapweed. Spotted knapweed used more water throughout the experiment (P = 0.01), with differences being greatest during bolting. The combination of water and nutrient uptake rates help to explain spotted knapweed’s ability to compete for resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery, Expression Profiling, and Evolutionary Analysis Of
    DISCOVERY, EXPRESSION PROFILING, AND EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF CYNODON EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS by CHANGSOO KIM (Under the Direction of Andrew H. Paterson) ABSTRACT Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) is a major turfgrass species for sports fields, lawns, parks, golf courses, and general utility turfs in tropical and subtropical regions. Despite its ecological importance, much of its study has been dependent upon classical approaches. Information about Bermudagrass at the molecular level has been deficient although molecular information for other plants has been accumulated for the last two dacades. In the current study, we constructed a normalized cDNA library from leaf tissue of Bermudagrass in order to expand our knowledge of its transcriptome. We sequenced and annotated 15,588 expressed sequence tags (ESTs), which were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) to be shared with other scientists. We also conducted cDNA array hybridization (macroarray) to profile genes responding to drought stress. A total of 120 and 69 genes were identified as up- and down-regulated, respectively. BLASTX annotation suggested that up-regulated genes may be involved in osmotic adjustment, signal transduction pathways, protein repair systems, and removal of toxins, while down-regulated genes were mostly related to basic plant metabolism such as photosynthesis and glycolysis. Using the cDNA sequences, we performed a comparative genomic study to gain new insight into the evolution of Bermudagrass. Results suggested that the common ancestor of the grass family experienced a whole genome duplication event at ca. 50.0 ~ 65.4 million years ago (MYA), before the divergence of the PACC and BEP clades at ca. 42.3 ~ 50.0 MYA.
    [Show full text]
  • Crested Wheatgrass Agropyron Desertorum (A.Cristatum)
    Crested Wheatgrass Agropyron desertorum (A.cristatum) Crested Wheatgrass is a cool season, vigorous growing, and drought tolerant, winter hardy, perennial bunchgrass which grows to a height of 1 to 3 feet. It’s dark green leaf blades taper to a sharp point and extend sharply upward from the base during the early part of the growing season. The leaf sheaths, which wrap tightly around the stems, are longer than the internodes, and have a smooth surface. The seed heads are approximately two inches long; have an unusual flat cockscomb or crested shape; and taper toward the tip, with the axis showing fine hairs. The grass has an extensive fibrous root system which penetrates as much as six feet. This gives the plant an advantage over weeds and enables it to do well in areas of as little as 12 inches of annual rainfall. Its drought tolerance, winter hardiness, and ability to withstand grazing, combined with high palatability and nutritious forage make it a valuable plant. There are two distinct species of crested wheatgrass – Standard (A. desertorum), and Fairway – A. cristatum). Crested wheatgrass should generally be seeded below 7,000 feet elevation. Crested wheatgrass does well on shallow to deep, moderately course to fine textured, moderately well to well drained soils. Under saline conditions, vigor and production are reduced. Seeding Rate: 5 to 7 PLS Lbs/ Ac Height Range (inches): 12 – 36 Seeds Per Pound: 311,200 Taxonomy Species: Agropyron cristatum or Agropyron desertorum Genus: Agropyron Gaertn. Family: Poaceae Order: Cyperales Subclass: Commelinidae Class: Liliopsida Division: Magnoliophyta Subkingdom: Tracheobionta Kingdom: Plantae Peoria, AZ 85382 Phone: 623-572-4907 Fax: 623-566-1436 www.arizonaseed.com .
    [Show full text]
  • GRASSES AS INVASIVE SPECIES Clay Antieau, MS, Phc Botanist, Horticulturist, Environmental Educator
    GRASSES AS INVASIVE SPECIES Clay Antieau, MS, PhC Botanist, Horticulturist, Environmental Educator WFCA Eighth Western Native Plant Conference November 2019 THE GRASS FAMILY (Poaceae) • Genera : 700 – 800 • Species: 7,500 – 11,000 (4th largest) • Comparable in size to Aves (Birds); ~ twice as large as Mammalia; half the size of Orchid or Aster families • First appeared in pollen record 55 – 70 mya (Paleocene) • Only angiosperm family found natively on all seven continents (Deschampsia Antarctica) • Includes cereal crops (forage, food, sugar, beer...); many ecological dominants • All major civilizations developed around cultivated grasses (Asia to Middle East to New World) Among the World’s Worst Invasives: Grasses • Imperata cylindrica (cogon grass) • Phragmites australis (common reed) • Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass) • Sorghum halepense (Johnson grass) • Spartina species and hybrids (cordgrasses) • Cortaderia species and hybrids (pampas grass) • Arundo donax (giant reed) • Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stilt grass) • Bromus tectorum (cheat) • Taeniatherum caput-medusae (medusahead) • Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass) • Neyraudia reynaudiana (silk reed) Important North American Invasive Grasses (adapted from www.fs.fed.us/database/feis) Aegilops cylindricus (goat grass) Eragrostis curvula (weeping lovegrass) Aegilops triuncialis (barbed goat grass) Eragrostis lehmanniana (Lehmann love Agropyron desertorum (desert wheat grass) grass) Elytrigia repens (quack grass) Agropyron cristatum (crested wheat Festuca arundinacea (tall fescue)
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the Black-Tailed Jack Rabbit Near a Solid Radioactive Waste Disposal Site in Southeastern Idaho
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1987 Ecology of the black-tailed jack rabbit near a solid radioactive waste disposal site in southeastern Idaho John C. Grant The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Grant, John C., "Ecology of the black-tailed jack rabbit near a solid radioactive waste disposal site in southeastern Idaho" (1987). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7052. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7052 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 T h i s i s an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t SUBSISTS. An y f u r t h e r r e p r in t in g o f i t s c o n t e n t s m u s t b e APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. Ma n s f ie l d L ib r a r y Un iv e r s i t y o f Mo n t a n a Da t e : ______ I 9 S '?__ Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]