DOCSLIB.ORG

Restoule V. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ONSC 7701 COURT FILE NO.: C-3512-14 & C3512-14A and COURT FILE NO.: 2001-0673 DATE: 20181221

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Restoule V. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ONSC 7701 COURT FILE NO.: C-3512-14 & C3512-14A and COURT FILE NO.: 2001-0673 DATE: 20181221 CITATION: Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ONSC 7701 COURT FILE NO.: C-3512-14 & C3512-14A and COURT FILE NO.: 2001-0673 DATE: 20181221 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: ) ) ) Court File No.: C-3512-14 & C3512-14A ) ) MIKE RESTOULE, PATSY CORBIERE, ) DUKE PELTIER, PETER RECOLLET, ) Joseph J. Arvay Q.C., David C. DEAN SAYERS and ROGER ) Nahwegahbow, Catherine Boies Parker DAYBUTCH, on their own behalf and on ) Q.C., Dianne G. Corbiere, Christopher behalf of ALL MEMBERS OF THE ) Albinati, Donald L. Worme Q.C., Scott OJIBEWA (ANISHINAABE) NATION ) Robertson and Jim Ratis, for the Plaintiffs. WHO ARE BENEFICIARIES OF THE ) ROBINSON HURON TREATY OF 1850 ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) – and – ) Owen Young, Michael McCulloch, Barry ) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF Ennis and Scott Warwick, for the Defendant ) CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL The Attorney General of Canada. ) OF ONTARIO and HER MAJESTY THE ) QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO Michael R. Stephenson, Peter Lemmond, ) Sarah Valair and Christine Perruzza for the Defendants ) Defendant The Attorney General of Ontario. ) ) THE RED ROCK FIRST NATION and ) THE WHITESAND FIRST NATION ) Harley Schachter and Kaitlyn Lewis, for the ) Third Parties. Third Parties ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -AND- ) ) Page: 2 ) Court File No.: 2001-0673 ) ) THE CHIEF and COUNCIL OF RED ) ROCK FIRST NATION, on behalf of the ) RED ROCKFIRST NATION BAND OF ) Harley Schachter and Kaitlyn Lewis, for the INDIANS, THE CHIEF and COUNCIL of ) Plaintiffs. the WITHESAND FIRST NATION on ) behalf of the WHITESAND FIRST ) NATION BAND OF INDIANS ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) ) – and – ) ) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ) Owen Young, Michael McCulloch, Barry CANADA, and HER MAJESTY THE ) Ennis and Scott Warwick, for the Defendant QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO and the ) The Attorney General of Canada. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO as ) representing HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) Michael R. Stephenson, Peter Lemmond, IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO ) Sarah Valair and Christine Perruzza for the ) Defendant The Attorney General of Ontario Defendants ) ) HEARD: September 25, 26, 27, October 2, ) 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 24, 25, 26, ) 27, 30, 31, November 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ) 14, 15, 16, 17, 27, 28, 29, 30, December 11, ) 12, 13, 14, 2017, January 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, ) 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, February 5, 6, 7, 8, ) 13, 14, March 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, ) June 4, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 22, ) 2018. P.C. HENNESSY, J. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT – STAGE ONE Page: 3 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT – STAGE ONE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 8 A. Procedure of the Trial and Nature of the Evidence......................................................... 8 II. WHO WERE THE ANISHINAABE OF THE UPPER GREAT LAKES REGION? 11 A. 1700 – 1850................................................................................................................... 12 i. Governance .............................................................................................................. 12 ii. Who was Chief Shingwaukonse? ............................................................................ 14 iii. Kinship and Doodem Identity .................................................................................. 15 a. Fictive Kinship and Alliances with Colonial Actors .......................................... 16 iv. Gift Giving, Presents, and the Principle of Reciprocity .......................................... 17 v. The Anishinaabe’s Perspective on Creation and Relationship to Land ................... 18 III. THE WRITTEN RECORD 1763 – 1849: FROM THE ROYAL PROCLAMATION TO THE VIDAL-ANDERSON COMMISSION...................................................................... 19 A. Pre-1763: The Covenant Chain Alliance ...................................................................... 20 i. 1756 – 1763: Extending the Covenant Chain to the Western Nations .................... 20 B. 1763: The Royal Proclamation of 1763 – Setting Out the Principles for Treaty Making 21 C. 1764: Council at Niagara .............................................................................................. 23 i. Presentation of Wampum Belts and Speech at Niagara .......................................... 23 ii. Diplomatic Discourse and Shared Metaphors ......................................................... 24 D. 1794: Dorchester Regulations – Operationalizing the Royal Proclamation ................. 25 E. 1812 – 1815: War of 1812 ............................................................................................ 25 i. The Shift from Military Alliance to Civilization Policy .......................................... 26 F. 1818: The Treaty-Making Process Incorporates Annuities .......................................... 26 i. 1830: The Colborne Policy and the Change in Annuities ....................................... 27 ii. Anishinaabe Awareness of Colonial Government Treaty-Making Activities in the Province .............................................................................................................................. 28 G. 1830s – 1840s: Life in the Upper Great Lakes Region ................................................. 28 H. 1840s: Mining Activity in the Upper Great Lakes Region ........................................... 28 I. 1845 – 1850: The Pre-Treaty Dialogue Between the Anishinaabe and the Crown ...... 29 i. The Crown’s Evolving View Pre-Treaty ................................................................. 29 ii. The Anishinaabe Assert Jurisdiction and Demand a Treaty .................................... 31 Page: 4 a. Summary of the Pre-Treaty Anishinaabe Complaints........................................ 34 iii. Anderson’s Visit and Report in 1848 ...................................................................... 34 IV. THE VIDAL-ANDERSON COMMISSION .................................................................. 37 A. Fall 1849: The Vidal-Anderson Commission ............................................................... 37 B. December 5, 1849: Report of the Vidal-Anderson Commission .................................. 39 i. Title .......................................................................................................................... 39 ii. The Anishinaabe’s Willingness to Treat ................................................................. 40 iii. Observations and Recommendations ....................................................................... 40 iv. Anishinaabe Use and Understanding of Money and the Concept of Value ............ 42 a. Use and Understanding of Money ...................................................................... 42 b. What did the Commissioners Mean by “Value of the Land”? ........................... 43 v. The Recommendation to Consider a Provision to Increase the Annuities .............. 44 C. Conclusion to the Vidal-Anderson Commission .......................................................... 45 V. THE MICA BAY INCIDENT AND INSTRUCTIONS TO ROBINSON ................... 45 A. The Involvement of William B. Robinson .................................................................... 46 B. Instructions to Robinson ............................................................................................... 48 VI. THE TREATY COUNCIL OF 1850: AN ACCOUNT ................................................. 50 A. Chronology of the Treaty Council ................................................................................ 50 i. August 18, 1850 – September 4, 1850: Pre-Treaty Meetings with Anishinaabe Chiefs and Leaders ............................................................................................................. 51 ii. The Opening Offer ................................................................................................... 52 iii. September 6, 1850: Different Responses to the Opening Offer .............................. 54 iv. September 7, 1850: Chief Peau de Chat Signs and Chief Shingwaukonse Repeats His Demands ...................................................................................................................... 55 v. September 9, 1850: The Huron Delegation Signs the Treaty .................................. 56 vi. September 10 – 24, 1850: Making the First Payments ............................................ 56 B. The Treaties’ Terms ...................................................................................................... 56 i. The Surrender and Compensation Term .................................................................. 56 ii. The Augmentation Clause ....................................................................................... 58 a. Did Chief Shingwaukonse Give Up His Demand for Revenue-Based Compensation? .............................................................................................................. 58 b. How did Robinson Explain the Augmentation Clause in His Official Report? . 59 c. Is it Reasonable to Conclude that Governor General Lord Elgin Approved of Robinson’s Intention to Offer an Augmentation Clause? ............................................. 60 d. When was the Concept of the Augmentation Clause Introduced or Proposed?. 62 Page: 5 VII. WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE POST-TREATY HISTORICAL RECORD? ................................................................................................................................... 64 A. The Post-Treaty Context: The Historical and Cultural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: an Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents
    Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: An Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents Superior-Greenstone District School Board 2014 2 Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region Acknowledgements Superior-Greenstone District School Board David Tamblyn, Director of Education Nancy Petrick, Superintendent of Education Barb Willcocks, Aboriginal Education Student Success Lead The Native Education Advisory Committee Rachel A. Mishenene Consulting Curriculum Developer ~ Rachel Mishenene, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Edited by Christy Radbourne, Ph.D. Student and M.Ed. I would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their contribution in the development of this resource. Miigwetch. Dr. Cyndy Baskin, Ph.D. Heather Cameron, M.A. Christy Radbourne, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Martha Moon, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Brian Tucker and Cameron Burgess, The Métis Nation of Ontario Deb St. Amant, B.Ed., B.A. Photo Credits Ruthless Images © All photos (with the exception of two) were taken in the First Nations communities of the Superior-Greenstone region. Additional images that are referenced at the end of the book. © Copyright 2014 Superior-Greenstone District School Board All correspondence and inquiries should be directed to: Superior-Greenstone District School Board Office 12 Hemlo Drive, Postal Bag ‘A’, Marathon, ON P0T 2E0 Telephone: 807.229.0436 / Facsimile: 807.229.1471 / Webpage: www.sgdsb.on.ca Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region 3 Contents What’s Inside? Page Indian Power by Judy Wawia 6 About the Handbook 7
    [Show full text]
  • Waubetek News 2019
    Waubetek Business Development Corporation “A Community Futures Development Corporation” WAUBETEK NEWS 2019 Featured Businesses this Issue INSIDE THIS ISSUE ➢ Northern Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative ..............pg.2 ➢Burke Stonework and Excavation - Bringing Your Landscape Dreams to Life……………………………………………….pg 3 ➢ M’Chigeeng Freshmart Store…………………………….....pg 4 ➢ Twiggs Coffee Roasters – More than just Coffee………........pg 5 ➢“Picking up Where Mother Nature Leafs Off.”…………………………….…………………….…......pg 6 ➢ WAUBETEK NEWS BRIEFS….. …………………..………pg 7 ➢ Outreach Services Spring 2019………………………....……pg 8 ➢ Touched By The Entrepreneurial Spirit....................................pg 9 ➢ Touched by the Entrepreneurial Spirit Map Guide………....pg 10 ➢ Waubetek Student Bursary Recipients………………..….....pg 11 ➢ Investing in the Aboriginal Business Spirit……………….. .pg 12 ➢ 30 years of Investing and more …………………………….pg 13 Freshly Roasted. Fair Trade. Organic. Waubetek News – Spring 2019 www.waubetek.com 2 New Program - Northern Integrated Commercial Fisheries Initiative In April, 2019, the Northern Integrated Commercial Fisheries working capital and scientific studies is not available through Initiative (NICFI) will formally launch as Canada’s newest NICFI, however. commercial fishing and aquaculture-related program. The Interest in the program was quite intense in late 2018 but aspect of this initiative dealing with commercial fisheries will Waubetek was able to gather funds for a program “soft launch” be delivered by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the in order to support nine projects. These ranged from Waubetek Business Development Corporation will be assistance with equipment and infrastructure, expansion of supporting aquaculture developments. NICFI was created to existing operations, feasibility studies, detailed designs, assist Indigenous groups develop commercial fishing and community engagements, business plans, partnership aquaculture operations that will: be economically self- development, and travel for facility visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands Advisory Board Regaining Control of Our Reserve Lands & Resources
    LANDS ADVISORY BOARD REGAINING CONTROL OF OUR RESERVE LANDS & RESOURCES A GUIDE TO THE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON FIRST NATION LAND MANAGEMENT 2017/2018 EDITION WWW.LABRC.COM CONTENT 1. THE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT 2. SIGNATORY COMMUNITIES 3. ULTIMATE GOALS 4. THE LANDS ADVISORY BOARD 5. THE RESOURCE CENTRE 6. FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT SUCCESS 7. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS “ I am proud of my people for wanting to take back management of the land because it has been too long that we didn’t have a say in what happened on our land. We voted yes because we want to go back to managing our land and traditional territories. If you look back at our past, there were only native people here and we had to look after our land, so that’s what we did. So now we have that chance again to manage our land and teach our children. Land is everything to us.” Chief Veronica Waboose Long Lake 58 First Nation, Longlac, Ontario Shutterstock/Sergei Bachlakov THE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON FIRST NATION LAND MANAGEMENT The road to the Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management (Framework Agreement) began in the late 1980’s, launched by a small group of First Nations Chiefs, looking for a way for First Nation communities to leave the paternalistic constraints of the Indian Act behind. The purpose of the Framework Agreement was to recognize the inherent right of First Nations to resume control over their lands and resources for the use and benefit of their members without Government interference, by replacing the land provisions of the Indian Act with First Nation made laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmobiling Page F12.Indd
    Page 8 - ALMAGUIN NEWS, Thursday, February 12, 2009 Trail Conditions North Bay as of February 11, 2009 Hwy #11 A Parry Sound - www.pssd.ca Muskoka - www.msrsnowtrails.com Near North - www.nnta.net Callander Bay D Almaguin/Burk’s Falls – OPEN All ADSC trails are open and groomed, one short piece of ADSC trail 304 is closed for the season (ATV land owner issue). 703 102D The piece closed is from D123 south to the Lookout on the 710 304. Lookout is open and groomed. 709 102C Callander/Restoule/Powassan/Astorville – OPEN Callander D trail is open from NN440 to North Bay. SSR 700 from Trout 102C Creek to Powassan - 23 km of road. Lake Nosbonsing and Lake D D Nipissing have been staked. D102C, SSR601, SSR603, SSR604, 700 SSR706, NB309, C110D, SSR700m SSR702, SSR703, SSR710 Nipissing 511 Powassan and A102D are all open. D trail from NN440 to Trout Creek 106 Lake Nipissing is temporarily closed this year. C106 from D102C to Dokis is 706 5 102C temporarily closed this year. C106 south from D102C has a 102C detour at SSR603 to AR505 to AR507. Restoule 700 Loring Area – OPEN Trout All “Tops trails” are open and groomed. The AR500 between 102C 601 605 110D 504 7 Creek AR501 and AR510 is still closed as well as the AR509 from 603 106 D the AR510 to Arnstein where it joins the D102C / C105D. The 105D 105D 503 505 AR501 from Port Loring to the AR500 is now staked and ready 503 to use. Trail C106 is closed between SSR603 and AR507.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Curriculum
    2018 REVISED The Ontario Curriculum Social Studies Grades 1 to 6 History and Geography Grades 7 and 8 The Ontario Public Service endeavours to demonstrate leadership with respect to accessibility in Ontario. Our goal is to ensure that Ontario government services, products, and facilities are accessible to all our employees and to all members of the public we serve. This document, or the information that it contains, is available, on request, in alternative formats. Please forward all requests for alternative formats to ServiceOntario at 1-800-668-9938 (TTY: 1-800-268-7095). CONTENTS PREFACE 3 Elementary Schools for the Twenty-First Century . 3 Supporting Students’ Well-Being and Ability to Learn . 3 INTRODUCTION 6 The Vision and Goals of the Social Studies, History, and Geography Curriculum . 6 The Importance of Social Studies, History, and Geography in the Curriculum . 9 Citizenship Education Framework . 10 Social Studies . 10 History . 11 Geography . 12 Concepts Underlying the Social Studies, History, and Geography Curriculum . 13 Indigenous Education in Ontario . 14 Roles and Responsibilities in Social Studies, History, and Geography . 15 THE PROGRAM IN SOCIAL STUDIES, HISTORY, AND GEOGRAPHY 19 Curriculum Expectations . 19 The Strands in the Social Studies, History, and Geography Curriculum . 22 The Inquiry Process in Social Studies, History, and Geography . 23 Spatial Skills: Using Maps, Globes, and Graphs . 25 ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION OF STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT 27 Basic Considerations . 27 The Achievement Chart for Social Studies, History, and Geography . 31 SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR PROGRAM PLANNING IN SOCIAL STUDIES, HISTORY, AND GEOGRAPHY 36 Instructional Approaches . 36 Cross-Curricular and Integrated Learning . 39 Planning Social Studies, History, and Geography Programs for Students with Special Education Needs .
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Engagement
    Indigenous Engagement Canada AECOM’s Integrated Our Guiding Who We Are Lifecycle of Services Principles AECOM’s global Indigenous engagement team is managed by Indigenous people. In Canada, − Community influence and input into siting, design, our staff have a long history of working on the and project planning Our Guiding Principles are modeled after the four principles of the front lines of engagement for various levels − Employment and training opportunities of government, industry, and Indigenous medicine wheel: − Retention of community members and communities. Using our extensive engagement Indigenous-owned businesses to assist expertise, we help our client understand the with projects North | mental is THINKING nuances of the negotiation processes, current Pre-planning Empower project participants with a positive and evolving legal context and Indigenous − Capacity building for longer-term project planning contribution in the decision-making process by community issues – and can help make the obtaining critical feedback on project concerns, Duty to Consult and Accommodate a positive alternatives, decisions, and the development of experience. Win-win solutions are our business, Successful Project Planning best practices as is getting it right the first time. We recognize the importance of developing meaningful and Implementation East | spiritual is SEEING relationships based on mutual respect and − Align with free, prior and informed consent Construction & understanding to help to ensure that the work principles Decommissioning Design
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Consultation for the Ontario Mining Act Modernization Process: Varying Perceptive on Whether the Consultation Process Works
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009 2012-11-10 Aboriginal Consultation for the Ontario Mining Act Modernization Process: Varying Perceptive on Whether the Consultation Process Works Petrone Reitberger, Elysia http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/222 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons Aboriginal Consultation fo r the Ontario Mining Act ModernizationProcess: Varying Perceptive on Whether the Consultation Process Works By Elysia Petrone Reitberger A Graduate Thesis Submitted in the Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements fo r a Master of Environmental Studies in Northern Environments & Cultures Departments of Geography and Anthropology Lakehead University May 201 1 LakeheadUNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES NAME OF STUDENT: Elysia Petrone-Reitberger DEGREE AWARDED: MES- NECU ACADEMIC UNIT: Geography TITLE OF THESIS: Aboriginal Consultation for the Ontario Mining Act Modernization Process: Varying Perspectives on Whether the Consultation Process Works This thesis has been prepared under my supervision and the candidate has complied with the Master's regulations. Signature of Supervisor /"t�\(� 2-v1 \ Date ABSTRACT Attempts to engage Aboriginal peoples in resource and environmental management decision-making process, fo r the most part, have been characterized as tokenism (Bowie 2007). This has left Aboriginal peoples frustrated and disillusioned. This thesis uses a theory of civil engagement, Arnstein's (1969) ladder of citizen participation, as a framework to interpret the level of Aboriginal consultation conducted during the Ontario Mining Act Modernization (MAM) process. This case study gauged the current state of public participation practices by examining Aboriginal peoples' participation and influence in decision making. In August 2008 the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development Mines and Forests (MNDMF) initiated a consultation process to modernizethe Mining Act.
    [Show full text]
  • ICECAP) Meeting Minutes
    Integrated Community Energy & Climate Action Plans (ICECAP) Meeting Minutes held on Tuesday, February 4th, 2020 at 10:00 AM in the Township of The Archipelago Council Chambers, 9 James Street Parry Sound ON P2A 1T4 ICECAP Corporate Stakeholder Present: Susan Murphy, Councillor, Carling Township Ryan Snowball, Planner, Carling Township Steven Kell, Species at Risk Biologist & Project Coordinator, Shawanaga First Nation Dalton Newman, Community Energy Champion, Shawanaga First Nation Peter Koetsier, Mayor, Township of Georgian Bay Dana Suddaby, Planner, Township of Georgian Bay Anthony Laforge, Director of Lands & Resources, Magnetawan First Nation Cory Kozmik, Species at Risk Biologist, Magnetawan First Nation Peter Hopkins, Mayor, Township of McKellar Tammy Wylie, Clerk Administrator, Township of McKellar Daryle Moffatt, Councillor, Seguin Township Dominique O’Brien, Director of Community Services, Seguin Township Forrest Pengra, Manager of Infrastructure and Technology, Town of Parry Sound Vanessa Backman, Councillor, Town of Parry Sound Alice Barton, Councillor, Township of the Archipelago Cale Henderson, Manager of Development and Environmental Services, Township of the Archipelago Randy Restoule, Dokis First Nation Monica Moore, Georgian Bay Biosphere Reserve ICECAP Partners Present: Brian Elliott, Lakeland Power Marjorie MacDonald, Lakeland Holding Jennifer Monpetit, Advanced Planning and Communications, Lakeland Holding Joe Villeneuve, GIS Coordinator, West Parry Sound Geography Network Scott McCrindle, Georgian College Teryl Faulkner,
    [Show full text]
  • Restructured Municipalities
    LIPSETT COPPERFIELD LINCOLN LEMOINE FOLEYET MUSKEGO REEVES SEWELL KNICELY LALIBERT LECLAIRE AGUONIE BIRD BRUYERE COPENACE MARSH LANG ABBEY CLIFTON BRUTUS REYNOLDS McKEOWN FRIPP MCARTHUR DOUGLAS FALLON FASKEN MICHIE NORDICA TERRY LEE MAISONVILLE ARNOLD KATRINE OSSIAN ABOTOSSAWAY HILLARY K I R K L A N D L A K E G A U T H I E R MACASKILL MENZIES MUSQUASH CORBIERE COWIE DEBASSIGE DOLSON ECHUM BADER COLLISHAW ADDISON CHAPLIN MANNING FLORANNA SADLER ALCORN PAUL WARREN CARTY PHARAND DOYLE MUSGROVE BARTLETT GEIKIE CLEAVER MCNEIL ROBERTSON SHEBA DUNMORE BOMPAS GRENFELL M C G A R R Y IVANHOE KEITH PENHORWOOD KENOGAMING CHILDERHOSE LEBEL 66 RREESSTTRRUUCCTTUULARRFORMEEEDD MMUUNNIICCIIPPAALLIITTIIEESS ANDRE ESQUEGA FIDDLER ISAAC HORNELL DELMAGE BUCKLAND RAMSDEN MAGEAU RACINE PATTINSON COLLINS MURDOCK EVANS PINOGAMI CROTHERS McBRIDE HASSARD BEEMER ENGLISH ZAVITZ HINCKS ARGYLE BADEN ALMA HOLMES BURT EBY OTTO 112 BOSTON McELROY McFADDEN W A W A KEESICKQUAYASH SILK HARDIMAN REGAN L A R D E R 144 66 L A K E BOSTWICK 101 HORWOOD NORTHRUP LASTHEELS MANESS MICHANO MISKOKOMON NADJIWON D AVAUGOURDRUILLETTES BLISS HILL MARSHALL D ARCY McGEE CHEWETT SANDY HELLYER BIGGS WHIGHAM ROBLIN GOUIN MOHER SEMPLE HUTT MONTROSE FLAVELLE GROSS BLAIN MARQUIS PACAUD CATHARINE RATTRAY Ontario Map #4 BANNOCKBURN S U D B U R Y EMERALD PANET SAVARD COSENS PETERS GILLILAND COCHRANE BORDEN GAMEY CROCKETT RANEY ROLLO COPPELL NEWTON DALE McOWEN WIGLE MIDDLEBORO HAZEN NURSEY SOTHMAN HALLIDAY WILLISON DAVIDSON SHARPE MARTER BAYLY MULLIGAN RABAZO NOGANOSH PAWIS QUILL RECOLLET M A T A
    [Show full text]
  • AOO Settlement Area Harvest
    Wicksteed Lake Lac du Goéland 40 LA SALLE WYSE Lac Smith Marten Lake MCAUSLAN North Spruce Lake Lac du Pin Blanc Poplar LakeHAMMELL GARROWCLARKSON Lac Ramé Lac Bruce Lac Sept Milles Bear Lake OSBORNE POITRAS Lac des Cornes Tilden Lake Map A Lac– Vaucour AOO Settlement Area Harvest Map Lac Saint-Paul Lac des Sables LOCKHART Lac Curières LYMAN NOTMANSTEWART JOCKO EDDY Lac Mosquic Tomiko Lake Lac Nilgaut Lac Barton MERRICK Lac Marin Lac Caugnawana CHARLTONBLYTH Lac Royal Lac des Mocassins MULOCKFRENCHBUTLERANTOINE Lac Maganasipi 41 Lac la Cave Lac Brodtkorb Lac en Croix Lac Gauvin Lac Forbes BEAUCAGE 41 Lac Lamb COMMANDA Lac Resolin Lac Quinn WIDDIFIELD PHELPS Legend OLRIG Lac Murray HWY 17 MATTAWAN Lac à la Tortue Lac McCracken Trout Lake Mattawa Lac Saint-Patrice Lake Talon (lac Talon) Algonquins of Ontario Settlement Area Boundary 42 HWY 17 Lac Dodd Lake Nipissing (lac Nipissing) Rutherglen Lac Duval Lac Wright BONFIELD Lac Schyan FERRIS CALVIN PAPINEAU Deux-Rivières Grand lac des Cèdres Lake Nosbonsing (lac Nosbonsing) Holden Lake Algonquin Park HarvestLac Area Montjoie Stonecliffe Lac Désert Astorville CAMERON CLARA Lac de la Mer Bleue LAUDER Lac Blue Sea Lac Chapleau Wasi Lake (lac Wasi) Rolphton NIPISSING 48 MARIA Harvest Area for Elk BOULTER HEAD CHISHOLM Kiosk BOYD Restoule Lake Lac Galarneau Kioshkokwi Lake ROLPH Deep River Lac Cayamant Lac Marie-Le Franc Commanda Lake PENTLAND FITZGERALD Lac Jim Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) WILKES DEACON Mountain View HIMSWORTH Manitou Lake Carl Wilson Lake Lac McGillivray 47 Cedar Lake BRONSON
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Shebeshekong Wetland Conservation Reserve (C115)
    Upper Shebeshekong Wetland Conservation Reserve (C115) Statement of Conservation Interest March 2005 Upper Shebeshekong Wetland Conservation Reserve (C115) Statement of Conservation Interest Ministry of Natural Resources Parry Sound District Prepared with the assistance of: Meteek & Company Huntsville, Ontario March 2005 i Approval Statement We are pleased to approve this Statement of Conservation Interest for Upper Shebeshekong Wetland Conservation Reserve (C115). Upper Shebeshekong Wetland Conservation Reserve is a 5,304 hectare area of Crown land that extends to the shoreline of Georgian Bay. The northern portion of the site is located in the geographic township of Shawanaga; most of that area is within the Municipality of the Township of The Archipelago, although the extreme eastern portions are unincorporated. The southern portion of the site is located within the Township of Carling. A portion of the northern boundary of this site is adjacent to Shawanaga First Nation territory. There is an isolated parcel of three lots (Lot 15, Concession 1 in the geographic township of Shawanaga, and Lots 20 and 21, Concession 10 in Carling Township) totaling 123 hectares, approximately one kilometre east of the main conservation reserve. The name of this protected area was changed from Shawanaga-Shebeshekong Conservation Reserve (as referred to in the Land Use Strategy), in order to avoid confusion with two other conservation reserves in this area which include the name “Shawanaga” in their site names. It was decided that the name of Upper Shebeshekong Wetland Conservation Reserve is more representative of the site, since most of the area is within the ‘Shebeshekong’ River watershed, and the name more accurately reflects one of the key values: the presence of a large complex of diverse wetlands.
    [Show full text]