Envelopes – Computational Theory and Applications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Envelopes – Computational Theory and Applications Envelopes – Computational Theory and Applications Category: survey Abstract for points, whose tangent plane maps to a line un- der the projection. These points form the so-called Based on classical geometric concepts we discuss contour of the surface with respect to the given the computational geometry of envelopes. The projection; the image of the contour is the silhou- main focus is on envelopes of planes and natural ette. Since the tangent t at a point p of the silhou- quadrics. There, it turns out that projective duality ette is the projection of the tangent plane at a sur- and sphere geometry are powerful tools for devel- face point, both the u-curve and the v-curve passing oping efficient algorithms. The general concepts through p have t as tangent there. This shows the are illustrated at hand of applications in geometric envelope property. Points on the envelope are also modeling. Those include the design and NURBS called characteristic points. representation of developable surfaces, canal sur- faces and offsets. Moreover, we present applica- X c tions in NC machining, geometrical optics, geo- v metric tolerancing and error analysis in CAD con- structions. Keywords: envelope, duality, sphere geometry, NURBS surface, developable surface, canal sur- face, geometric tolerancing. s 1 Introduction p 2 Definition and computa- Figure 1: The silhouette of a surface as envelope of tion of envelopes the projections of the parameter lines 2.1 First order analysis For an analytic representation we note that the tangent plane of the surface is spanned by the tan- We will define and discuss envelopes at hand of a gent vectors to the parameter lines, which are the spatial interpretation. Let us first illustrate this ap- partial derivatives with respect to u and v, proach with a simple special case. Consider a sur- ∂ ∂ face in Euclidean 3-space R3, which has the regular X X ∂ =: Xu, ∂ =: Xv. parameterization u v Under the normal projection onto the plane x3 = 0, X(u,v)=(x1(u,v),x2(u,v),x3(u,v)). the tangent plane has a line as image iff it is par- allel to the x -axis. In other words, the projections Here and in the sequel, we always assume suffi- 3 xu,xv of the two vectors Xu,Xv must be linearly de- cient differentiability. The curves u = const and pendent, i.e., v = const form two one-parameter families of curves (‘parameter lines’) on the surface. Under x1,u x2,u det(xu,xv)= 0 ⇐⇒ = 0. (1) a projection, e.g. the normal projection onto the x1 v x2 v , , plane x3 = 0, each family of parameter lines is mapped onto a one-parameter set of planar curves. The computation of the silhouette (envelope) s The envelope of each of these two curve families is therefore equivalent to finding the zero set of is the silhouette s of the surface X (see Fig.1). It a bivariate function. This is done with a stan- is defined as follows: On the surface X, we search dard contouring algorithm, a special case of a surface/surface intersection algorithm (see [21]). The ui are the parameters of the n-dimensional sur- Let us recall that (1) characterizes the envelope faces and the λk are the set parameters. We inter- of two curve families, described by x(u,v) = pret this set of surfaces as normal projection of a k+n+1 d (x1(u,v),x2(u,v)): the set of u-lines (where u is the hypersurface Φ in R onto R (xd+1 = ... = curve parameter and v is the set parameter) and the xk+n+1 = 0). At any point of Φ, the tangent hyper- set of v-lines (where v is the curve parameter and u plane is spanned by the partial derivatives with re- is the set parameter). spect to u1,...,un,λ1,...,λk. Their projections are Given any one-parameter set of curves in the the partial derivatives of f . At a point of the sil- plane with a parametric representation x(u,v), we houette (= envelope), these derivative vectors must can interpret it as projection of a surface onto that span at most a hyperplane in Rd. This yields the plane; it is sufficient to set x3(u,v)= v. If the curve envelope condition family is given in implicit form, ∂ f ∂ f ∂ f ∂ f rank( ,..., , ,..., ) < d. (4) ∂u1 ∂un ∂λ1 ∂λk f (x1,x2,v)= 0, It characterizes points on the envelope by a rank we interpret it again as projection of a surface with deficiency of the Jacobian matrix of f . the level curves f (x1,x2,v)= 0 in the planes x3 = v. Analogously, we find the following known re- The tangent planes of this surface f (x1,x2,x3)= 0 sult. The envelope of a k-parameter set of hyper- are normal to the gradient vectors surfaces in Rd, analytically represented by λ λ ∂ f ∂ f ∂ f f (x1,...,xd, 1,..., k)= 0, (5) ∇ f =( , , ). ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x3 is the solution of the system Hence, a tangent plane is projected onto a line iff f (x1,...,λk)= 0, (6) the gradient vector is normal to the x3-axis, i.e. ∂ f ∂ f (x1,...,λk)= 0,..., (x1,...,λk)= 0. ∂λ1 ∂λk ∂ f = 0. The envelope conditions elucidate the computa- ∂x 3 tional difficulties: we have to solve a nonlinear sys- We see that the silhouette (= envelope) is the solu- tem of equations. tion of the system (we set again x3 = v), In special cases, a variety of methods are avail- able. Let us give an important example. For a one- ∂ f parameter set of surfaces in R3 (n = 2,k = 1), equa- f (x ,x ,v)= 0, (x ,x ,v)= 0. (2) 1 2 ∂v 1 2 tion (4) can be formulated as ∂ ∂ ∂ This is a well-known result. Its computational f f f det(∂ , ∂ , ∂λ )= 0. treatment can follow our derivation: one has to u1 u2 1 compute a projection of the intersection of two Hence, we have to compute the zero set of a trivari- implicit surfaces (see [21]). An implicit rep- ate function, which can be done, for example, with resentation of the envelope follows by elimina- marching cubes [31]. The solution is the preim- tion of v from (1). A parametric representation age of the envelope in the parameter domain, and (x1(v),x2(v)) is obtained by solving for x1 and x2. application of f to it results in the envelope itself. By the spatial interpretation, various algorithms for For systems of polynomial or rational equations, computing silhouettes may also be applied [1, 21]. one can use algorithms which employ the subdi- With the understanding of this special case, it vision property of Bezier´ and NURBS representa- is straightforward to extend the results to the gen- tions [10, 25, 56]. In more general situations one eral case. It concerns envelopes of k-parameter sets realizes the lack of algorithms for geometric pro- of n-dimensional surfaces in Rd (n < d). We set cessing in higher dimensions. k + n ≥ d, since otherwise there is in general no envelope. 2.2 Singularities, curvature com- Let us start with the parametric representation in putation and approximation of the form envelopes λ λ (u1,...,un, 1,..., k) 7→ Let us continue with the special case of a one- d f (u1,...,un,λ1,...,λk) ∈ R . (3) parameter family of curves in the plane and its en- 2 velope, viewed as silhouette of a surface in R3. It also shows cusps at the curve of regression. They is well known in classical constructive geometry are additionally satisfying [6] that the silhouette of a surface possesses a cusp ∂3 if the projection ray is an osculating tangent at the f (x1,x2,x3,v)= 0. corresponding point of the contour. Therefore, the ∂v3 condition for cusps follows by expressing that the The transition to higher dimensions is straightfor- x3-parallel projection ray has contact of order two ward: A one-parameter family of hypersurfaces in with the surface. Rd, written as Let us work out this condition in case that the 3 curve family (surface in R ) is given in implicit f (x1,...,xd,v)= 0, 0 0 0 form f (x1,x2,v)= 0. We pick a point (x1,x2,v ) on the surface and express that the projection ray has an envelope hypersurface which also satisfies 0 0 0 R (x1,x2,v + t), t ∈ , has contact of order two ∂ f at this point. We use the Taylor expansion at (x1,...,xd,v)= 0. 0 0 0 ∂v (x1,x2,v ), On this envelope, we have a (d − 2)-dimensional f (x1,x2,v)= (7) surface of singular points characterized by ∂ ∂ ∂ f 0 f 0 f 0 2 (x1 − x1)+ (x2 − x2)+ (v − v )+ ∂ f ∂x1 ∂x2 ∂v (x ,...,x ,v)= 0. ∂ 2 1 d ∂2 ∂2 v 1 f 0 2 f 0 2 (x1 − x ) + ... + (v − v ) +(∗). 2 ∂x2 1 ∂v2 The singularities of this surface possess vanishing 1 third derivative of f , and so on. Clearly, the enve- Here, all partial derivatives are evaluated at lope and the singular sets need not be real. 0 0 0 (x1,x2,v ) and (*) denotes terms of order ≥ 3. In- For a reliable approximation of envelope serting v0 +t for v, we must get a threefold zero at curves/surfaces, the computation of singularities t = 0 in order to have second order contact. Using is an important subtask. More generally, we can 0 0 0 the fact that (x1,x2,v ) is a point on the contour, use results of constructive differential geometry to this requires in addition compute curvatures.
Recommended publications
  • Strophoids, a Family of Cubic Curves with Remarkable Properties
    Hellmuth STACHEL STROPHOIDS, A FAMILY OF CUBIC CURVES WITH REMARKABLE PROPERTIES Abstract: Strophoids are circular cubic curves which have a node with orthogonal tangents. These rational curves are characterized by a series or properties, and they show up as locus of points at various geometric problems in the Euclidean plane: Strophoids are pedal curves of parabolas if the corresponding pole lies on the parabola’s directrix, and they are inverse to equilateral hyperbolas. Strophoids are focal curves of particular pencils of conics. Moreover, the locus of points where tangents through a given point contact the conics of a confocal family is a strophoid. In descriptive geometry, strophoids appear as perspective views of particular curves of intersection, e.g., of Viviani’s curve. Bricard’s flexible octahedra of type 3 admit two flat poses; and here, after fixing two opposite vertices, strophoids are the locus for the four remaining vertices. In plane kinematics they are the circle-point curves, i.e., the locus of points whose trajectories have instantaneously a stationary curvature. Moreover, they are projections of the spherical and hyperbolic analogues. For any given triangle ABC, the equicevian cubics are strophoids, i.e., the locus of points for which two of the three cevians have the same lengths. On each strophoid there is a symmetric relation of points, so-called ‘associated’ points, with a series of properties: The lines connecting associated points P and P’ are tangent of the negative pedal curve. Tangents at associated points intersect at a point which again lies on the cubic. For all pairs (P, P’) of associated points, the midpoints lie on a line through the node N.
    [Show full text]
  • A Special Conic Associated with the Reuleaux Negative Pedal Curve
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMETRY Vol. 10 (2021), No. 2, 33–49 A SPECIAL CONIC ASSOCIATED WITH THE REULEAUX NEGATIVE PEDAL CURVE LILIANA GABRIELA GHEORGHE and DAN REZNIK Abstract. The Negative Pedal Curve of the Reuleaux Triangle w.r. to a pedal point M located on its boundary consists of two elliptic arcs and a point P0. Intriguingly, the conic passing through the four arc endpoints and by P0 has one focus at M. We provide a synthetic proof for this fact using Poncelet’s porism, polar duality and inversive techniques. Additional interesting properties of the Reuleaux negative pedal w.r. to pedal point M are also included. 1. Introduction Figure 1. The sides of the Reuleaux Triangle R are three circular arcs of circles centered at each Reuleaux vertex Vi; i = 1; 2; 3. of an equilateral triangle. The Reuleaux triangle R is the convex curve formed by the arcs of three circles of equal radii r centered on the vertices V1;V2;V3 of an equilateral triangle and that mutually intercepts in these vertices; see Figure1. This triangle is mostly known due to its constant width property [4]. Keywords and phrases: conic, inversion, pole, polar, dual curve, negative pedal curve. (2020)Mathematics Subject Classification: 51M04,51M15, 51A05. Received: 19.08.2020. In revised form: 26.01.2021. Accepted: 08.10.2020 34 Liliana Gabriela Gheorghe and Dan Reznik Figure 2. The negative pedal curve N of the Reuleaux Triangle R w.r. to a point M on its boundary consist on an point P0 (the antipedal of M through V3) and two elliptic arcs A1A2 and B1B2 (green and blue).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Projects 1 Envelopes, Evolutes, and Euclidean Distance Degree
    Final Projects Directions: Work together in groups of 1-5 on the following four projects. We suggest, but do not insist, that you work in a group of > 1 people. For projects 1,2, and 3, your group should write a text le with (working!) code which answers the questions. Please provide documentation for your code so that we can understand what the code is doing. For project 4, your group should turn in a summary of observations and/or conjectures, but not necessarily code. Send your les via e-mail to [email protected] and [email protected]. It is preferable that the work is turned in by Thursday night. However, at the very latest, please send your work by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on Friday, August 16. 1 Envelopes, Evolutes, and Euclidean Distance Degree Read the section in Cox-Little-O'Shea's Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms on envelopes of families of curves - this is in Chapter 3, section 4. We will expand slightly on the setup in Chapter 3 as follows. A rational family of lines is dened as a polynomial of the form Lt(x; y) 2 Q(t)[x; y] 1 L (x; y) = (A(t)x + B(t)y + C(t)); t G(t) where A(t);B(t);C(t); and G(t) are polynomials in t. The envelope of Lt(x; y) is the locus of and so that there is some satisfying and @Lt(x;y) . As usual, x y t Lt(x; y) = 0 @t = 0 we can handle this by introducing a new variable s which plays the role of 1=G(t).
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Higher Order Path and Envelope Curvature Theories in Kinematics
    UNIFIED HIGHER ORDER PATH AND ENVELOPE CURVATURE THEORIES IN KINEMATICS By MALLADI NARASH1HA SIDDHANTY I; Bachelor of Engineering Osmania University Hyderabad, India 1965 Master of Technology Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India 1969 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 1979 UNIFIED HIGHER ORDER PATH AND ENVELOPE CURVATURE THEORIES IN KINEMATICS Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser J ~~(}W>p~ Dean of the Graduate College To Mukunda, Ananta, and the Mothers ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude and thanks to Professor A. H. Soni, chairman of my doctoral committee, for his keen interest in introducing me to various aspects of research in kinematics and his continued guidance with proper financial support. I thank the "Soni Family" for many warm dinners and hospitality. I am thankful to Professors L. J. Fila, P. F. Duvall, J. P. Chandler, and T. E. Blejwas for serving on my committee and for their advice and encouragement. Thanks are also due to Professor F. Freudenstein of Columbia University for serving on my committee and for many encouraging discussions on the subject. I thank Magnetic Peripherals, Inc., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, my em­ ployer since the fall of 1977, for the computer facilities and the tui­ tion fee reimbursement. I thank all my fellow graduate students and friends at Stillwater and Oklahoma City for their warm friendship and discussions that made my studies in Oklahoma really rewarding. I remember and thank my former professors, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating the Envelope of a Swept Trivariate Solid
    GENERATING THE ENVELOPE OF A SWEPT TRIVARIATE SOLID Claudia Madrigal1 Center for Image Processing and Integrated Computing, and Department of Mathematics University of California, Davis Kenneth I. Joy2 Center for Image Processing and Integrated Computing Department of Computer Science University of California, Davis Abstract We present a method for calculating the envelope of the swept surface of a solid along a path in three-dimensional space. The generator of the swept surface is a trivariate tensor- product Bezier` solid and the path is a non-uniform rational B-spline curve. The boundary surface of the solid is the combination of parametric surfaces and an implicit surface where the determinant of the Jacobian of the defining function is zero. We define methods to calculate the envelope for each type of boundary surface, defining characteristic curves on the envelope and connecting them with triangle strips. The envelope of the swept solid is then calculated by taking the union of the envelopes of the family of boundary surfaces, defined by the surface of the solid in motion along the path. Keywords: trivariate splines; sweeping; envelopes; solid modeling. 1Department of Mathematics University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8562, USA; e-mail: madri- [email protected] 2Corresponding Author, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8562, USA; e-mail: [email protected] 1 1. Introduction Geometric modeling systems construct complex models from objects based on simple geo- metric primitives. As the needs of these systems become more complex, it is necessary to expand the inventory of geometric primitives and design operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Domain and Elementary Geometry
    Safe domain and elementary geometry Jean-Marc Richard Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et Cosmologie, Universit´eJoseph Fourier– CNRS-IN2P3, 53, avenue des Martyrs, 38026 Grenoble cedex, France November 8, 2018 Abstract A classical problem of mechanics involves a projectile fired from a given point with a given velocity whose direction is varied. This results in a family of trajectories whose envelope defines the border of a “safe” domain. In the simple cases of a constant force, harmonic potential, and Kepler or Coulomb motion, the trajectories are conic curves whose envelope in a plane is another conic section which can be derived either by simple calculus or by geometrical considerations. The case of harmonic forces reveals a subtle property of the maximal sum of distances within an ellipse. 1 Introduction A classical problem of classroom mechanics and military academies is the border of the so-called safe domain. A projectile is set off from a point O with an initial velocity v0 whose modulus is fixed by the intrinsic properties of the gun, while its direction can be varied arbitrarily. Its is well-known that, in absence of air friction, each trajectory is a parabola, and that, in any vertical plane containing O, the envelope of all trajectories is another parabola, which separates the points which can be shot from those which are out of reach. This will be shortly reviewed in Sec. 2. Amazingly, the problem of this envelope parabola can be addressed, and solved, in terms of elementary geometrical properties. arXiv:physics/0410034v1 [physics.ed-ph] 6 Oct 2004 In elementary mechanics, there are similar problems, that can be solved explicitly and lead to families of conic trajectories whose envelope is also a conic section.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Pentadeltoid'
    ON THE PENTADELTOID' BY R. P. STEPHENS Introductory. In his Orthocentric Properties of the Plane n-Line, Professor Morley| makes use of a curve of class 2n — 1, which he calls the A2"-1. Of these curves, the deltoid (n = 2) is the well-known three-cusped hypocycloid; but the curve of class five ( n. = 3 ), which I shall call Pentadeltoid, and more frequently represent by the symbol A'', is not so well known, though its shape and a few of its properties were known to Clifford $. I shall here prove some of the properties of the pentadeltoid. My purpose in presenting this curve is two- fold: 1. the discussion of a curve of many interesting properties; 2. the illus- tration of the use of vector analysis as a tool in the metric geometry of the plane. The line equation of a curve is here uniformly expressed by means of con- jugate coordinates,§ while the point equation is expressed by means of what is commonly called the map equation, that is, a point of the curve is expressed as a function of a parameter t, which is limited to the unit circle and is, therefore, always equal in absolute value to unity. Throughout I shall consider y and b as conjugates of x and a, respectively; that is, if X and Y are rectangular coordinates of a point, then x = X+iY, y = X-iY, and similarly for a and b.\\ Some of the properties of the curves of class 2« — 1 and of degree 2n, easily inferred from those of the A5, are also proved, but there has been no attempt at making a complete study of the general case.
    [Show full text]
  • Steiner's Hat: a Constant-Area Deltoid Associated with the Ellipse
    STEINER’S HAT: A CONSTANT-AREA DELTOID ASSOCIATED WITH THE ELLIPSE RONALDO GARCIA, DAN REZNIK, HELLMUTH STACHEL, AND MARK HELMAN Abstract. The Negative Pedal Curve (NPC) of the Ellipse with respect to a boundary point M is a 3-cusp closed-curve which is the affine image of the Steiner Deltoid. Over all M the family has invariant area and displays an array of interesting properties. Keywords curve, envelope, ellipse, pedal, evolute, deltoid, Poncelet, osculat- ing, orthologic. MSC 51M04 and 51N20 and 65D18 1. Introduction Given an ellipse with non-zero semi-axes a,b centered at O, let M be a point in the plane. The NegativeE Pedal Curve (NPC) of with respect to M is the envelope of lines passing through points P (t) on the boundaryE of and perpendicular to [P (t) M] [4, pp. 349]. Well-studied cases [7, 14] includeE placing M on (i) the major− axis: the NPC is a two-cusp “fish curve” (or an asymmetric ovoid for low eccentricity of ); (ii) at O: this yielding a four-cusp NPC known as Talbot’s Curve (or a squashedE ellipse for low eccentricity), Figure 1. arXiv:2006.13166v5 [math.DS] 5 Oct 2020 Figure 1. The Negative Pedal Curve (NPC) of an ellipse with respect to a point M on the plane is the envelope of lines passing through P (t) on the boundary,E and perpendicular to P (t) M. Left: When M lies on the major axis of , the NPC is a two-cusp “fish” curve. Right: When− M is at the center of , the NPC is 4-cuspE curve with 2-self intersections known as Talbot’s Curve [12].
    [Show full text]
  • Iterating Evolutes and Involutes
    Iterating evolutes and involutes Work in progress with M. Arnold, D. Fuchs, I. Izmestiev, and E. Tsukerman Integrability in Mechanics and Geometry: Theory and Computations June 2015 1 2 Evolutes and involutes Evolute: the envelope of the normals, the locus of the centers of curvature; free from inflections and has zero algebraic length. Involute: string construction; come in 1-parameter families. 3 Hedgehogs Wave fronts without inflection and total rotation 2π, given by their support function p(α). ....................................... ....................................... ...................................... .................. .................. π ........... .......... ........ ........ .............. α + ...... .... ...... ......... ..... .... ..... ...... .... .... ........ 2 .... .... ....... .... .... .... ...... .... .. .... ....... .. .. ........... .. ..... ......... ....... p!(α).......... .... ....... .. ........... .... .. ...... ... .......... .... ... ....... .... .......... .... .... ....... .... ......... .... .......... ..... ........ .... ......... ..... O ..... .... ......... ....... γ ..... .......... ........ ..... ........... .... ........... •......p(α) ................ .... ..................... ...... ........................... .... ....................................................................................................... ....... .... ...... ....... .... ............ .... .......... .... ....... ..... ..... ....... ..... .α The evolute map: p(α) 7! p0(α − π=2), invertible on functions with zero
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Definitions and Acronyms for Rail Systems
    APTA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM APTA STD-ADMIN-GL-001-19 GUIDELINES First Published June 20, 2019 American Public Transportation Association 1300 I Street NW, 12th Floor East, Washington, DC, 20005 Compendium of Definitions and Acronyms for Rail Systems Abstract: This compendium was developed by the Technical Services & Innovation Department and published by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) to provide a glossary of commonly used definitions and acronyms in documents such as standards, recommended practices, and guidelines, so there is consistency within the rail transportation industry. Summary: APTA, through its subsidiary the North American Transit Services Association (NATSA), develops standards, recommended practices and guidelines for the benefit of public rail transportation. These tasks are accomplished by working groups consisting of members from rail transit agencies, manufacturers, consultants, engineers and other interested groups. Through the development of these documents, working groups have created a wide array of terms and abbreviations, many with varying definitions. This compendium has been developed to standardize the usage of such definitions and acronyms as it relates to rail operations, maintenance practices, designs and specifications. This document is dynamic in nature in that, over time, additional definitions and acronyms will be included. It is APTA’s intention that the document be sufficiently expanded at some point in the future to provide common usage of terms encompassing all rail industry requirements. Scope and purpose: This compendium applies to all rail agencies that operate commuter rail, heavy rail (subway systems), light rail, streetcars, and trolleys. The usage of these definitions and acronyms are voluntary. Nevertheless, it is the desire of APTA that the rail industry apply these terms to all documents such as standards, recommended practices, standard operating practices, standard maintenance practices, rail agency policies and procedures, and agency rule books.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolute and Evolvente.Pdf
    Evolute and involute (evolvent) Interactive solutions to problem s of differential geometry © S.N Nosulya, V.V Shelomovskii. Topical sets for geometry, 2012. © D.V. Shelomovskii. GInMA, 2012. http://www.deoma-cmd.ru/ Materials of the interactive set can be used in Undergraduate education for the study of the foundations of differential geometry, it can be used for individual study methods of differential geometry. All figures are interactive if you install GInMA program from http://www.deoma-cmd.ru/ Conception of Evolute In the differential geometry of curves, the evolute of a curve is the locus of all its centers of curvature. Equivalently, it is the envelope of the normals to a curve. Apollonius (c. 200 BC) discussed evolutes in Book V of his Conics. However, Huygens is sometimes credited with being the first to study them (1673). Equation of evolute Let γ be a plane curve containing points X⃗T =(x , y). The unit normal vector to the curve is ⃗n. The curvature of γ is K . The center of curvature is the center of the osculating circle. It lies on the normal 1 line through γ at a distance of from γ in the direction determined by the sign of K . In symbols, K the center of curvature lies at the point ζ⃗T =(ξ ,η). As X⃗ varies, the center of curvature traces out a ⃗n plane curve, the evolute of γ and evolute equation is: ζ⃗= X⃗ + . (1) K Case 1 Let γ is given a general parameterization, say X⃗T =(x(t) , y(t)) Then the parametric equation of x' y' '−x ' ' y ' the evolute can be expressed in terms of the curvature K = .
    [Show full text]
  • Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility SIXTH EDITION
    Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility SIXTH EDITION Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility THEORY AND MANAGEMENT OF STRABISMUS Gunter K. von Noorden, MD Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology Cullen Eye Institute Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology University of South Florida College of Medicine Tampa, Florida Emilio C. Campos, MD Professor of Ophthalmology University of Bologna Chief of Ophthalmology S. Orsola-Malpighi Teaching Hospital Bologna, Italy Mosby A Harcourt Health Sciences Company St. Louis London Philadelphia Sydney Toronto Mosby A Harcourt Health Sciences Company Editor-in-Chief: Richard Lampert Acquisitions Editor: Kimberley Cox Developmental Editor: Danielle Burke Project Manager: Agnes Byrne Production Manager: Peter Faber Illustration Specialist: Lisa Lambert Book Designer: Ellen Zanolle Copyright ᭧ 2002, 1996, 1990, 1985, 1980, 1974 by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photo- copy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without per- mission in writing from the publisher. NOTICE Ophthalmology is an ever-changing field. Standard safety precautions must be followed, but as new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug therapy may become necessary or appropriate. Readers are advised to check the most current product information provided by the manufacturer of each drug to be administered to verify the recommended dose, the method and duration of administration, and contraindications. It is the responsibility of the treating physician, relying on experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each individual pa- tient.
    [Show full text]