DOCSLIB.ORG

Bicycle Facilities and Alternative Transportation Plan Final Report - February 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bicycle Facilities and Alternative Transportation Plan Final Report - February 2012 Bicycle Facilities and Alternative Transportation Plan Final Report - February 2012 Prepared by: KTU+A Planning and Landscape Architecture In Association with: IBI Group City of La Mesa Bicycle Facilities and Alternative Transportation Plan Final Report - February 2012 Prepared For: City of La Mesa, California 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, California 91942 Prepared By: KTU+A 3916 Normal Street San Diego, CA 92103 In Association With: IBI Group 701 B Street, Suite 1170 San Diego, CA 92101 Acknowledgements City of La Mesa Bill Chopyk, AICP, Community Development Director Cheryl Davis, Administrative Coordinator Kathy Feilen, P.E. Engineering Project Manager Greg Humora, P.E., Public Works Director Chris Jacobs, AICP, Senior Planner Robin Keightley, Community Development Program Coordinator Michael Kinnard, P.E., Associate Engineer Kristen Langford, Planning Intern Patricia Rutledge, Community Development Program Coordinator KTU+A Mike Singleton, LLA, AICP CTP, LEED AP, Principal in Charge Joe Punsalan, GISP, LCI, Project Manager Catrine Machi, AICP, LCI, Planner IBI Group Dennis Wahl, Associate Brian Gaze, Planner LA MESA BICYCLE FACILITIES AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Project Scope ..........................................................................................................................9 1.2 The Cyclist’s and Pedestrian’s Perspective .........................................................................10 1.3 Field Work .............................................................................................................................10 1.4 Community Input ..................................................................................................................11 2. Bicycle Infrastructure 2.1 Existing Bicycle Infrastructure ........................................................................................... 14 2.2 Bicycle Facilities Objectives and Policies .......................................................................... 18 2.3 Summary of Existing Plans ................................................................................................ 22 2.4 Mapping of Existing Conditions ....................................................................................... 25 2.5 Bicycle Collisions .................................................................................................................. 35 2.6 Bicycle Issues ......................................................................................................................... 36 2.7 Prioritized Bicycle Projects ................................................................................................ 39 2.8 Bicycle Demand Assessment ............................................................................................ 50 2.9 Projected Bicycle Demand .................................................................................................. 50 2.10 Bicycle Parking Assessment .............................................................................................. 52 3. Pedestrian Infrastructure 3.1 Pedestrian Facilities Goals, Objectives and Policies ........................................................ 58 3.2 Summary of Existing Pedestrian Plans ............................................................................. 61 3.3 Pedestrian Collisions ............................................................................................................ 63 3.4 Route Classifications ............................................................................................................ 66 3.5 Route Types Defined ............................................................................................................ 66 3.6 Route Types Found in La Mesa .......................................................................................... 67 3.7 Route Type Treatment Levels ............................................................................................. 74 3.8 Safety Issues ........................................................................................................................... 76 3.9 Connectivity Issues ............................................................................................................... 87 3.10 Walkability Issues ................................................................................................................ 94 3.11 Prioritized Pedestrian Projects .......................................................................................... 98 3.12 Top Priority Pedestrian Projects ....................................................................................... 99 1 LA MESA BICYCLE FACILITIES AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 4. Recommended Bicycle and Pedestrian Programs 4.1 Encouragement .....................................................................................................................105 4.2 Education ...............................................................................................................................109 4.3 Enforcement ..........................................................................................................................112 4.4 Engineering ............................................................................................................................113 4.5 Evaluation and Planning ......................................................................................................114 5. Public Transit Infrastructure 5.1 City of La Mesa Public Transit Goals, Policies and Objectives 117 5.2 Light Rail Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 118 5.3 Bus Service ........................................................................................................................... 120 5.4 ADA Paratransit Service ...................................................................................................... 123 5.5 Specialized Travel Programs Sponsored by the City of La Mesa ................................. 123 5.6 Assessment of future trolley and bus service levels........................................................ 124 5.7 Transit Stops and Ridership ................................................................................................ 124 5.8 Bus Stop Issues ..................................................................................................................... 126 5.9 Safe Routes to Transit: Recommended Transit Improvements ..................................... 128 6. Universal Access 6.1 Goals and Policies ............................................................................................................... 165 6.2 Assessment of Infrastructure Needs ................................................................................. 166 6.3 Solutions that Address Accessibility Issues ...................................................................... 171 7. Complete Streets and Street Classification 7.1 Regional Standards for Complete Streets .........................................................................176 7.2 Complete Streets at Intersections .....................................................................................182 7.3 Complete Streets Documentation .................................................................................... 188 7.4 Proposed Circulation Element Street Classification .......................................................189 2 LA MESA BICYCLE FACILITIES AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Appendices A: Caltrans BTA Compliance B: Bicycle and Pedestrian Model Criteria C: Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Scoring Criteria D: Bicycle Facilities Design Guidelines E: Funding Sources F: Safe Routes to School Guidelines G: Caltrans Chapter 1000 Design Guidelines H: Public Input I: Complete Streets and Agency Publications J: Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Sheets 3 LA MESA BICYCLE FACILITIES AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Figures Figure 2.1 Existing Bicycle Facilities ........................................................................................26 Figure 2.2 Activity Centers ........................................................................................................27 Figure 2.3 Existing Land Use ....................................................................................................28 Figure 2.4 Planned Land Use ....................................................................................................29 Figure 2.5 Speed Limits ..............................................................................................................30 Figure 2.6 Average Daily Trips (ADTs) ...................................................................................31 Figure 2.7 Bicycle and Pedestrian Suitability Model ..............................................................32 Figure 2.8 Bicycle Commuters ..................................................................................................33 Figure 2.9 Bicycle Related Collisions .......................................................................................34 Figure 2.10 Typical Bicycle Issues ............................................................................................36 Figure 2.11 Recommended Class 2 Bike Lanes ......................................................................40 Figure 2.12 Recommended Class 3 Bike Routes ....................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Empirical Study of Bicyclists' Turning Behaviour at Signalized Intersections
    An Empirical Study of Bicyclists' Turning Behaviour at Signalized Intersections by Adam James Fraser A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in the fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Civil Engineering Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2018 ©Adam James Fraser Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is the true copy of the thesis including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that this thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Efforts to increase cycling mode share have seen some success in North America, though challenges persist due to real and perceived safety issues. Of particular concern are left turns at signalized intersections. Left turns can be particularly challenging to traverse and often leave cyclists feeling unsafe, especially those who are less experienced. To reduce conflict and enhance safe left-turn maneuvering, the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania has initiated a pilot study for the installation of two-phase left turn bike boxes. This thesis investigates how the installation of two-phase left turn bike boxes influence left-turning behaviour at signalized intersections. A literature review found few studies that demonstrate the benefits of two-phase left turn bike boxes, and generally few studies that document left turn behaviour in a North American context. Similarly, few studies differentiate between signal control infractions and road space infractions. The approach used a before and after video analysis of five unique left-turning scenarios of installation of two-phase left turn bike boxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Study
    FINAL REPORT PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN STUDY Prepared by: In association with: I N E S T E R N A T Marshall I O Macklin N A Monaghan L PROJECT MANAGERS • ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS January 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Chapter Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................1-1 3.2 Study Purpose ................................. 3-3 1.1 About Vaughan................................1-1 3.3 The Master Plan Strategy................ 3-3 1.2 Why Does Vaughan Need a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master 4.0 NETWORK ............................4-1 Plan?..................................................1-2 4.1 Creating a Pedestrian and Cycling 1.3 Vision for Walking and Cycling Network .......................................... 4-1 in the City of Vaughan......................1-3 4.2 Network Goals and Objectives ....... 4-1 2.0 CONTEXT................................2-1 4.3 Objective 4a: Determining a 2.1 Benefits to Walking and Cycling ....2-1 Clearly Defined Network Structure.......................................... 4-1 2.1.1 Transportation Benefits.................2-1 2.1.2 Recreation, Health and Fitness 4.4 Objective 4b: Provide Designated Benefits .........................................2-1 On and Off-Road Pedestrian and 2.1.3 Environmental Benefits.................2-2 Cycling Facilities ............................ 4-3 2.1.4 Economic Benefits........................2-2 4.4.1 Class 1 Facilities: Multi-Use 2.2 Previous City Initiatives ..................2-2 Pathways........................................ 4-3 4.4.2 Class 2 Facilities: Bike Lanes / 2.3 Master Plan Initiatives.....................2-3 Paved Shoulders ............................ 4-5 4.4.3 Class 3 Facilities: Signed-Only 2.3.1 User Survey...................................2-3 Routes............................................ 4-6 2.3.2 Intercept User Surveys ..................2-3 4.4.4 Class 4 Facilities: Footpaths / 2.3.3 General Findings ...........................2-4 Hiking Trails.................................
    [Show full text]
  • Normalising Cycling Mobilities
    APPLIED MOBILITIES https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2021.1872206 ARTICLE Normalising cycling mobilities: an age-friendly approach to cycling in the Netherlands Wilbert den Hoed a and Helen Jarvisb aEuropean Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK; bSchool of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Cycling is promoted as a form of urban travel with well-established Received 15 January 2019 benefits to health, liveability and wellbeing. These benefits are Accepted 4 January 2021 comparatively large for older people, a growing segment in many KEYWORDS populations. Yet, support for the normalisation of cycling mobilities Cycling; mobility; ageing; for all ages varies considerably. It is usual to contrast low-cycling active ageing; normalisation; contexts, such as the UK, with high-cycling areas, typically favouring mobile methods highest-rate paradigmatic urban centres. To challenge a too sim­ plistic imitation and re-creation of engineering solutions elsewhere, we draw attention to diverse cycling habits and norms in residents of a more ordinary high-cycling area (suburban Rotterdam), and observe how cycling is normalised throughout the lifecourse. Using mobile and biographical methods, we argue that a more nuanced appreciation of cycling normalisation is gained from viewing age­ ing and cycling relationally and biographically. This is because the habit-forming realm of normalisation functions through both con­ scious decisions and unconscious practice, bound up with life events and the external environment. The findings suggest that age-friendly city strategies and urban mobility policies should more closely consider locally constituted social and cultural processes, beyond providing infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Costing of Bicycle Infrastructure and Programs in Canada Project Team
    Costing of Bicycle Infrastructure and Programs in Canada Project Team Project Leads: Nancy Smith Lea, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership Dr. Ray Tomalty, School of Urban Planning, McGill University Researchers: Jiya Benni, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership Dr. Marvin Macaraig, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership Julia Malmo-Laycock, School of Urban Planning, McGill University Report Design: Jiya Benni, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership Cover Photo: Tour de l’ile, Go Bike Montreal Festival, Montreal by Maxime Juneau/APMJ Project Partner: Please cite as: Benni, J., Macaraig, M., Malmo-Laycock, J., Smith Lea, N. & Tomalty, R. (2019). Costing of Bicycle Infrastructure and Programs in Canada. Toronto: Clean Air Partnership. CONTENTS List of Figures 4 List of Tables 7 Executive Summary 8 1. Introduction 12 2. Costs of Bicycle Infrastructure Measures 13 Introduction 14 On-street facilities 16 Intersection & crossing treatments 26 Traffic calming treatments 32 Off-street facilities 39 Accessory & support features 43 3. Costs of Cycling Programs 51 Introduction 52 Training programs 54 Repair & maintenance 58 Events 60 Supports & programs 63 Conclusion 71 References 72 Costing of Bicycle Infrastructure and Programs in Canada 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Bollard protected cycle track on Bloor Street, Toronto, ON ..................................................... 16 Figure 2: Adjustable concrete barrier protected cycle track on Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, ON ............ 17 Figure 3: Concrete median protected cycle track on Pandora Ave in Victoria, BC ............................ 18 Figure 4: Pandora Avenue Protected Bicycle Lane Facility Map ............................................................ 19 Figure 5: Floating Bus Stop on Pandora Avenue ........................................................................................ 19 Figure 6: Raised pedestrian crossings on Pandora Avenue .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BRAC Junior Track Cycling Camp  May 3-4, 2014  USOC Memorial Park Velodrome Colorado Springs, CO USAC Permit - Pending
    BRAC Junior Track Cycling Camp May 3-4, 2014 USOC Memorial Park Velodrome Colorado Springs, CO USAC Permit - Pending We are pleased to announce the first official 2014 BRAC Junior Track Cycling Camp. The camp takes place over the weekend of May 3-4. We will learn to ride on the USOC Memorial Park Velodrome, which is located in Colorado Springs. The riders will also get to spend Saturday night at the Olympic Training Center. Three meals from the training center are included along with snacks and lunch at the velodrome on Sunday. During camp riders will learn how to ride on the track. This includes learning the standard means of communication, common riding practices, and predictable riding. All which ensure safety while racing and training on the track. We will also go over the track bicycle in general, cover how to change gears, and give advice on which gears to ride for certain events and training. Finally we will learn about the different track races and get to practice racing! It should be noted that most track racing for juniors is scheduled for the new Boulder Valley Velodrome (BVV) in Erie. In order to race at the BVV riders must have completed a track cycling certification course. This camp is a wonderful opportunity to satisfy the certification process and get a head start on the track cycling season! Who Can Attend: Male and Female riders with a current racing age between 11-18. Riders must hold a 2014 USA Cycling Road/Track racing license. Dates/Times: Saturday, May 3rd 10:00am* – Sunday, May 4th 2:00pm *We understand many Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Data Collection Manual - Draft July 2015 6
    View the updated report: Bicycle and Pedestrian Data Collection Manual - JULY 17, 2015 The Minnesota Department of Transportation Draft is developing a statewide bicycle and pedestrian data collection program. This manual summarizes main elements of this program, including data collection goals, types of data to collect and best practices for sensor calibration and data analysis. The research phase of the program is expected to be completed in 2016, at which time the manual will be updated and issued as a final document. Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT Report No. MN/RC 2015-33 Office of Transit, Bicycle / Pedestrian Section [email protected] www.dot.state.mn.us/bike To request this document in an alternate format call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota) or email your request to [email protected]. Please request at least one week in advance. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC 2015-33 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Bicycle and Pedestrian Data Collection Manual - Draft July 2015 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Erik Minge, Cortney Falero, Greg Lindsey, Michael Petesch 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. SRF Consulting Group Inc. Humphrey School of Public One Carlson Parkway North Affairs, Office 295 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. Plymouth, MN 55447 University of Minnesota (c) 04301 301 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation Draft Manual Office of Transit, Bicycle/Pedestrian Section Mail Stop 315 395 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Everyday Mobility Meets Tourism: an Age-Friendly Perspective on Cycling in the Netherlands and the UK
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Strathclyde Institutional Repository JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1656727 Where everyday mobility meets tourism: an age-friendly perspective on cycling in the Netherlands and the UK Wilbert den Hoed European Policies Research Centre, School of Government and Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Tourism is traditionally presented as an escape from daily life and Received 31 May 2018 located at places we do not normally visit. Against a backdrop of prob- Revised 5 July 2019 lematic pressures on (urban) tourist centres and mobility systems, some Accepted 12 August 2019 scholars have explored the possibility of tourism nearer the home. Such KEYWORDS locations, however, are often perceived too mundane or are not suffi- Tourism; active mobility; ciently equipped as tourist destinations. In addition, the study of tourist cycling; well-being; ageing experiences is often dominated by motorised transport, and with limited consideration of older age groups. This article combines different strands of literature to consider the role of active mobility among older people and its contribution to age-friendliness and more proximate forms of tourism. Two case studies in the contrasting mobility contexts of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom show how everyday mobili- ties contain implicit and explicit tourism elements. Commutes, local vis- its, and active travel itself may act as springboards for tourism close(r) to home. Using biographical and mobile methods, this article shows how local tourism roots in individual lifecourses, is shaped by the trans- port environment, and supports social and physical well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Miyata Catalogue 85
    MIYATA THERIGHI' E OF REFERENCE rHE RIGHr APPROACH fHE RIGHr sruw The first mistake you can make when buying a Metallurgy is not alchemy but if Miyata tech­ bicycle, is buying a bicycle. Quite understand ­ nicians have failed to create gold from base met­ ably You have an end-use in mind so it seems als, they have succeeded with something nearly reasonable to insp ect an end product. And yet, as valuable . Chrome molybdenum alloyed steel. It the collage of components you see has little to do is milled into exc eedingly lightweight, amazingly with what you get. The right frame of reference is strong tubing. Miyata tubing. We call it Cr-Mo. We looking for the right frame. are the only bicycle manufacturer that processes its own tubing, and , as such , we do not have to settle for merely double butted tubes. We have rHE RIGHr OESIGN advanced to triple, even quadruple, butting. It begins with geometry: the relationships be­ Butting simply means making the tubes tween the major tubes that comprise the frame. thicker on the ends-where they butt together­ Tube lengths and the angle at which they intersect than they are in the middle. It makes the tube determine how well suited the frame is for a specif­ stronger where the frame is potentially weaker. ic task. For example: a racing frame's seat and However, not every joint head tubes are more vertical than other frames. re Ce i Ve s th e s am e ____ STRENGTH RETENTIO The top tube is _shorter, and so is the overall wheel ­ stress, so every joint ! base.
    [Show full text]
  • CPQCC HRIF Directory NOV2018
    CPQCC Center Directory Listed by County 12/10/18 CCS CPeTS County Hospital Name Address Phone NICU OSHPD # RPPC Region Regio Status Level n 3011 Telegraph Ave 1 - North Coast East Alta Bates Summit Medical Center ● 510-204-1648 Com 010739 North NICU + HRIF BerKeley, CA 94705 Bay 280 W. Mac Arthur Blvd. Kaiser Permanente - OaKland ● 510-752-1000 Reg 014326 10 - Kaiser North North NICU + HRIF OaKland, CA 94611 Kaiser Permanente - San Leandro 2500 Merced Street 510-454-1000 Com 014337 10 - Kaiser North North NICU + HRIF (Hayward) ● San Leandro, CA 94577 Alameda 1425 S. Main Street Kaiser Permanente - Walnut CreeK ● 925-295-4000 Com 070990 10 - Kaiser North North NICU + HRIF Walnut CreeK, CA 94598 UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital - 747 52nd Street 1 - North Coast East 510-428-3000 Reg 010776 North NICU + HRIF OaKland ● OaKland, CA 94609 Bay 3 - San Joaquin- Washington Hospital Healthcare System - 2000 Mowry Avenue 510-797-1111 Int 010987 Central Valley-Sierra North NICU only Fremont ▲ Fremont, CA 94538 Nevada 3 - San Joaquin- 2755 Hendon Clovis Clovis Community Medical Center ▲ 559-324-4000 Int 100005 Central Valley-Sierra NA NICU only Clovis, CA 93611 Nevada 1601 Ygnacio Valley Road 1 - North Coast East Contra Costa John Muir Medical Center ● 925-939-3000 Com 070988 North NICU + HRIF Walnut CreeK, CA 94598 Bay Rady Children's at Scripps Memorial 354 Santa Fe 9 - San Diego and Encinitas 760-633-7801 Int 371394 NA NICU only Hospital Encinitas ▲ Encinitas, CA 92024 Imperial St. Agnes Medical Center (Valley 3 - San Joaquin- 1303 E. Herdon Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Store # Phone Number Store Shopping Center/Mall Address City ST Zip District Number 318 (907) 522-1254 Gamestop Dimond Center 80
    Store # Phone Number Store Shopping Center/Mall Address City ST Zip District Number 318 (907) 522-1254 GameStop Dimond Center 800 East Dimond Boulevard #3-118 Anchorage AK 99515 665 1703 (907) 272-7341 GameStop Anchorage 5th Ave. Mall 320 W. 5th Ave, Suite 172 Anchorage AK 99501 665 6139 (907) 332-0000 GameStop Tikahtnu Commons 11118 N. Muldoon Rd. ste. 165 Anchorage AK 99504 665 6803 (907) 868-1688 GameStop Elmendorf AFB 5800 Westover Dr. Elmendorf AK 99506 75 1833 (907) 474-4550 GameStop Bentley Mall 32 College Rd. Fairbanks AK 99701 665 3219 (907) 456-5700 GameStop & Movies, Too Fairbanks Center 419 Merhar Avenue Suite A Fairbanks AK 99701 665 6140 (907) 357-5775 GameStop Cottonwood Creek Place 1867 E. George Parks Hwy Wasilla AK 99654 665 5601 (205) 621-3131 GameStop Colonial Promenade Alabaster 300 Colonial Prom Pkwy, #3100 Alabaster AL 35007 701 3915 (256) 233-3167 GameStop French Farm Pavillions 229 French Farm Blvd. Unit M Athens AL 35611 705 2989 (256) 538-2397 GameStop Attalia Plaza 977 Gilbert Ferry Rd. SE Attalla AL 35954 705 4115 (334) 887-0333 GameStop Colonial University Village 1627-28a Opelika Rd Auburn AL 36830 707 3917 (205) 425-4985 GameStop Colonial Promenade Tannehill 4933 Promenade Parkway, Suite 147 Bessemer AL 35022 701 1595 (205) 661-6010 GameStop Trussville S/C 5964 Chalkville Mountain Rd Birmingham AL 35235 700 3431 (205) 836-4717 GameStop Roebuck Center 9256 Parkway East, Suite C Birmingham AL 35206 700 3534 (205) 788-4035 GameStop & Movies, Too Five Pointes West S/C 2239 Bessemer Rd., Suite 14 Birmingham AL 35208 700 3693 (205) 957-2600 GameStop The Shops at Eastwood 1632 Montclair Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Promoting Bicycling on Federal Lands
    GUIDE TO PROMOTING BICYCLING ON FEDERAL LANDS Publication No. FHWA-CFL/TD-08-007 September 2008 Central Federal Lands Highway Division 12300 West Dakota Avenue Lakewood, CO 80228 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-CFL/TD-08-007 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date September 2008 Guide to Promoting Bicycling on Federal Lands 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rebecca Gleason, P.E. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Western Transportation Institute P.O. Box 174250 11. Contract or Grant No. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 DTFH68-06-X-00029 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report Central Federal Lands Highway Division August 2006 – August 2008 12300 W. Dakota Avenue, Suite 210 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Lakewood, CO 80228 HFTS-16.4 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Susan Law – FHWA CFLHD. Advisory Panel Members: Andy Clarke – League of American Bicyclists, Andy Rasmussen – FHWA WFLHD, Ann Do – FHWA TFHRC, Chris Sporl – USFS, Christine Black and Roger Surdahl – FHWA CFLHD, Franz Gimmler – Rails to Trails Conservancy, Gabe Rousseau – FHWA HQ, Gay Page – NPS, Jack Placchi – BLM, Jeff Olson – Alta Planning and Design, Jenn Dice – International Mountain Bicycling Association, John Weyhrich – Adventure Cycling Association, Nathan Caldwell – FWS, Tamara Redmon – FHWA HQ, Tim Young – Friends of Pathways. This project was funded under the FHWA Federal Lands Highway Coordinated Technology Implementation Program (CTIP). 16. Abstract Federal lands, including units of the National Park Service, National Forests, National Wildlife Refuges, and Bureau of Land Management lands are at a critical juncture.
    [Show full text]
  • El Cajon Transit Center
    Transdev - San Diego Effective: 01/31/2021 52001 Work Drive Spread Duty Block Report Start Start End End Clear Time Time Time Type Time Place Time Time Place Time Saturday 7h48 4h59 8h39 AMST 893601 4:39 ecbmf 4:54 6:38 orvbru 6:38 Car001 6:38 orvbru 6:38 6:56 ecbmf 6:56 881502 7:47 ecbmf 8:02 9:35 ecajtc 9:35 881501 10:08 ecajtc 10:13 13:05 ecajtc 13:05 Car014 13:05 ecajtc 13:05 13:13 ecbmf 13:18 Sign-on 4:39 4:54 Route 815 / 8151 Route 815 / 8152 El Cajon Transit Center.............. 8:43 East Main & Madison..................11:40 Block 893601 East Main St & Ballantyne St........ 8:50 2nd St & East Main St..................11:46 2nd St & East Main St.................. 8:57 East Main St & Ballantyne St........11:55 Deadhead Trip / 99 East Main & Madison.................. 9:01 El Cajon Transit Center..............12:05 East County Garage................... 4:54 Orville St & Brucker Ave............ 5:12 Recovery piece 9:01 9:10 Recovery piece 12:05 12:13 Route 936 / 9361 Route 815 / 8152 Route 815 / 8151 Orville St & Brucker Ave............ 5:12 East Main & Madison.................. 9:10 El Cajon Transit Center..............12:13 Carlisle Dr & Cardiff St................. 5:20 2nd St & East Main St.................. 9:16 East Main St & Ballantyne St........12:21 Lemon Grove Trolley Station........ 5:29 East Main St & Ballantyne St........ 9:25 2nd St & East Main St..................12:29 College Grove Center................... 5:38 El Cajon Transit Center.............. 9:35 East Main & Madison..................12:33 El Cajon Blvd & College Ave.......
    [Show full text]