DOCSLIB.ORG

Surface Water Monitoring Plan (SWMP) As Required Under the Regional Board Order No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surface Water Monitoring Plan (SWMP) As Required Under the Regional Board Order No Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority Surface Water Monitoring Plan Kern County, California • February 2015 Prepared for: Prepared by: Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority Surface Water Monitoring Plan Revision 1 Kern County, California Initial Submittal: August 4, 2014 Resubmittal: February 2, 2015 Prepared for: Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority Kern County, California Prepared by: Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group Bakersfield, California COPYRIGHT 2015 by PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights to this document. This document is not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group In the event of unauthorized reuse of the information contained herein by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group's legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights. The Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority (KRWCA) shall have unlimited use of this work product. Certifications This Surface Water Monitoring Plan is signed by the following certified professionals: Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group Project Team This Surface Water Monitoring Plan was prepared by the following project team members: Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group • Matthew Klinchuch, PE • John Schaap, PE • Debora De La Torre, EIT • Gavin O’Leary Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... ES-1 Third-Party Area Description ............................................................................................................... ES-1 Land Use and Management Practices ................................................................................................. ES-1 Potential Discharges, Pollutants, and Water Quality Problems .......................................................... ES-2 Surface Water Monitoring Plan Overview ........................................................................................... ES-2 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... ES-3 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority Background ........................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Member Districts .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Description of Coalition Group Area ........................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Kern River ............................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.2.2 Friant-Kern Canal .................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2.3 State Water Project .............................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.4 Groundwater Banking Facilities ........................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.5 Minor Creeks and Streams ................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.6 Water Conveyance Facilities ................................................................................................ 1-8 1.2.7 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.2.8 Climate & Hydrology ............................................................................................................ 1-9 1.2.9 Beneficial Uses ................................................................................................................... 1-10 2 Surface Water Quality Status ..................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Current Status ........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Monitoring Trends .................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Potential Discharges ................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3.1 Agricultural Drainage ........................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.2 Storm Water Runoff ............................................................................................................. 2-2 3 Agricultural Management Practices .........................................................................................3-1 3.1 Management Practices Trends in Kern County ........................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Water Application Practices ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Soil Enhancement and Control ............................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.3 Pesticide Application ............................................................................................................ 3-3 Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group • February 2015 i 3.1.4 Fertilizer Application ............................................................................................................ 3-4 3.2 Management Practices and Land Use ...................................................................................... 3-5 3.3 Future Management Practice Implementation ........................................................................ 3-6 4 Surface Water Monitoring Site Selection & Rationale ...............................................................4-1 4.1 Proposed Monitoring Sites ....................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Chanac Creek (Core) ............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.2 El Paso Creek (Ephemeral) ................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3 Tecuya Creek (Ephemeral) ................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.4 Poso Creek (Core) ................................................................................................................. 4-3 4.2 Monitoring Site Coordination ................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.1 Cawelo Water District Coalition – Poso Creek ..................................................................... 4-4 4.2.2 Buena Vista Coalition – Main Drain Canal ............................................................................ 4-4 4.3 Rejected Monitoring Sites ........................................................................................................ 4-4 4.3.1 Caliente Creek ...................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.3.2 San Emigdio Creek ................................................................................................................ 4-4 4.3.3 Miscellaneous Small Creeks ................................................................................................. 4-5 4.3.4 Kern River Outlet Canal ........................................................................................................ 4-5 4.3.5 James Canal .......................................................................................................................... 4-5 4.3.6 Connecting Slough ................................................................................................................ 4-5 4.3.7 Friant-Kern Canal .................................................................................................................. 4-5 4.3.8 Conveyance Facilities ........................................................................................................... 4-5 4.4 Selection Rationale Summary ................................................................................................... 4-6 5 Surface Water Monitoring Schedule ........................................................................................5-1 5.1 Assessment Monitoring Schedule ............................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Ephemeral Monitoring Schedule .............................................................................................. 5-2 5.3 Core Monitoring Schedule ........................................................................................................ 5-2 5.4 Special Monitoring Schedule .................................................................................................... 5-3 5.5 Monitoring Prioritization .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On
    From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican Contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 By Kumiko Noguchi B.A. (University of the Sacred Heart) 2000 M.A. (Rikkyo University) 2003 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Native American Studies in the Office of Graduate Studies of the University of California Davis Approved Steven J. Crum Edward Valandra Jack D. Forbes Committee in Charge 2009 i UMI Number: 3385709 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3385709 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Kumiko Noguchi September, 2009 Native American Studies From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 Abstract The main purpose of this study is to show the path of tribal development on the Tule River Reservation from 1776 to 1936. It ends with the year of 1936 when the Tule River Reservation reorganized its tribal government pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • AB3030 Groundwater Management Plan
    FINALFINAL AB3030 Groundwater Management Plan Prepared for Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District November 2007 Todd Engineers with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants FINAL AB3030 Groundwater Management Plan Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District Kern County, California Prepared for: Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District 12109 Highway 166 Bakersfield, CA 93313 Prepared by: Todd Engineers 2200 Powell Street, Suite 225 Emeryville, CA 94608 with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants 1000 Hill Road, Suite 200 Ventura, CA 93003-4455 November 2007 Table of Contents List of Tables....................................................................................................................... v List of Figures..................................................................................................................... v List of Appendices............................................................................................................... v Executive Summary...................................................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................1 1.1. Background......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Goals and Objectives of the Plan........................................................................ 2 1.3. Public Participation............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4. Basin Setting
    Eastern Tule GSA Draft GSP | Section 4 Section 4. Basin Setting Table of Contents SECTION 4. BASIN SETTING ............................................................................................................................... 4-I TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................... 4-I 4.1 INTRODUCTION [23 CCR § 354.12] ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONCEPTUAL MODEL [23 CCR § 354.14(A)] ..................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING [23 CCR § 354.14(B)(1), (C), (D)(1)(2)(3)] ............................................................. 4-2 4.2.2 LATERAL BASIN BOUNDARY [23 CCR § 354.14 (B)(2)] .......................................................................... 4-3 4.2.3 BOTTOM OF BASIN [23 CCR § 354.14 (B)(3)] ....................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.4 SURFACE WATER FEATURES [23 CCR § 354.14 (D)(5)] ......................................................................... 4-4 4.2.4.1 Lake Success ................................................................................................................................................. 4-4 4.2.4.2 Tule River ..................................................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.2.4.3
    [Show full text]
  • Kern Community Radio
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Section 73.3556 of the ) MB Docket No. 19-310 Commission’s Rules Regarding Duplication of ) Programming on Commonly Owned Radio Stations ) ) Modernization of Media Regulation ) MB Docket No. 17-105 Initiative ) Reply Comments of Kern Community Radio This reply comment is from nonprofit Kern Community Radio (“Kern”). Kern is a prospective non-commercial community broadcaster in Bakersfield, California. Kern is supplying this comment to shed light on the reality of how duplicated- and rebroadcast- programming is an epidemic. Redundant and relayed programming is hollowing-out local radio, vastly reducing programming diversity, and frustrating diverse new broadcast entrants. This reply is being filed as a response to National Association of Broadcasters’ (“NAB”) comment stating that diversity has increased on the dail, advocating the lift of the duplication rule. Kern provides proof in this reply that the program duplication rules need to be expanded to ensure local programming diversity and allow for new entrants. About Kern Community Radio Members of Kern Community Radio had desired to pursue a non-commercial, educational community radio station for Bakersfield in 2006 due to the total absence of any local local secular non-commercial radio. Bakersfield, a metropolitan area of roughly 840,000 people, does not have one local-studio secular, non-commercial radio station. That includes no secular LPFM, no local-content NPR station,1 no community station, or no college station. The entire non-commercial FM band except for one station is all relayed via satellite from chiefly religious broadcasters from Texas, Idaho, and Northern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report Forest Service Grant / Agrreement No
    PROGRESS REPORT FOREST SERVICE GRANT / AGRREEMENT NO. 13-DG-11132540-413 Period covered by this report: 04/01/2014—05/31/2015 Issued to: Center of Southwest Culture, Inc. Address: 505 Marquette Avenue, NW, Suite 1610 Project Name: Arboles Comunitarios Contact Person/Principal Investigator Name: Arturo Sandoval Phone Number: 505.247.2729 Fax Number: 505.243-1257 E-Mail Address: [email protected] Web Site Address (if applicable): www.arbolescomunitarios.com Date of Award: 03/27/2013 Grant Modifications: Date of Expiration: 05/31/2015 Funding: Federal Share: $95,000 plus Grantee Share: $300,000 = Total Project: $395,000 Budget Sheet: FS Grant Manager: Nancy Stremple / Address: 1400 Independence Ave SW, Yates building (3 Central) Washington, DC 20250-1151 Phone Number: 202/309-9873 Albuquerque Service Center (ASC) Send a copy to: Albuquerque Service Center Payments – Grants & Agreements 101B Sun Ave NE Albuquerque, NM 87109 EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: 877-687-4894 Project abstract (as defined by initial proposal and contract): Arboles Comunitarios is proposed under Innovation Grant Category 1 as a national Spanish language education program. By utilizing the expertise of the Center of Southwest Culture community and urban forestry partners along with the targeted outreach capacity of Hispanic Communications Network, this project will communicate the connection between the personal benefits of urban forest and quality of life in a manner that resonates specifically with the Hispanic community. Project objectives: • Bilingual website with
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Promotes a More Efficient
    CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS INTRODUCTION This chapter sets forth plans of action for the region to pursue and meet identified transportation needs and issues. Planned investments are consistent with the goals and policies of the plan, the Sustainable Community Strategy element (see chapter 4) and must be financially constrained. These projects are listed in the Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) and are modeled in the Air Quality Conformity Analysis. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes Forecast modeling methods in this Regional Transportation a more efficient transportation Plan primarily use the “market-based approach” based on demographic data and economic trends (see chapter 3). The system that calls for fully forecast modeling was used to analyze the strategic funding alternative investments in the combined action elements found in this transportation modes, while chapter.. emphasizing transportation demand and transporation Alternative scenarios are not addressed in this document; they are, however, addressed and analyzed for their system management feasibility and impacts in the Environmental Impact Report approaches for new highway prepared for the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan, as capacity. required by the California Environmental Quality Act (State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126(f) and 15126.6(a)). From this point, the alternatives have been predetermined and projects that would deliver the most benefit were selected. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes a more efficient transportation system that calls for fully funding alternative transportation modes, while emphasizing transportation demand and transporation system management approaches for new highway capacity. The Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) includes projects that move the region toward a financially constrained and balanced system.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulare Kern Funding Area Information
    Funding Area Information May 2020 Tulare Kern Funding Area The Tulare Kern Funding Area includes the southern half of the San Joaquin Valley and the southern portion of the Sierra Nevada mountain range. There are seven IRWM Regions in the Funding Area: Kern, Poso Creek, Southern Sierra, Tule, Kaweah, Kings, and Westside-San Joaquin. Disadvantaged Community Involvement Program The Disadvantaged Community Involvement Program in the Tulare Kern Funding Area involves the seven IRWM groups. The Funding Area relied on the IRWM regions and Self-Help Enterprises to facilitate Tribal outreach for the program. The DACI grant included a project development component, through which the Tule River Tribe received funding to develop design and engineering documents for three projects. Grantee: Tulare County Grant Award: $3,400,00 Grant Start: February 2018 Needs Assessment: In Progress Integrated Regional Water Management Regions* Southern Sierra The Southern Sierra IRWM region lies partially in the Tulare Kern Funding Area and partially in the Mountain Counties Funding Area. The group recognizes three federally recognized, and many other non-federally recognized, tribes. The Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) is governed according to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The Group includes 18 members who have signed the MOU, including Big Sandy Rancheria, and 43 interested stakeholders who participate but have no voting rights. The RWMG is supported by a Coordinating Committee and various Work Groups who provide advice and input to the RWMG. The Stakeholder Coordinator for the Group has reached out to the local Native American Tribes to encourage their participation and membership. Kings Basin The Kings Basin Water Authority is a Joint Powers Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Provenance and Dispersal of Neogene–Quaternary Strata of the Southeastern San Joaquin Basin and Its Transition Into the GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: Origin and Evolution of the Sierra Nevada and Walker Lane GEOSPHERE Sediment provenance and dispersal of Neogene–Quaternary strata of the southeastern San Joaquin Basin and its transition into the GEOSPHERE; v. 12, no. 6 southern Sierra Nevada, California doi:10.1130/GES01359.1 Jason Saleeby1, Zorka Saleeby1, Jason Robbins2, and Jan Gillespie3 13 figures; 2 tables; 2 supplemental files 1Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA 2Chevron North America Exploration and Production, McKittrick, California 93251, USA 3Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Bakersfield, California 93311, USA CORRESPONDENCE: jason@ gps .caltech .edu CITATION: Saleeby, J., Saleeby, Z., Robbins, J., and ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Gillespie, J., 2016, Sediment provenance and dis- persal of Neogene–Quaternary strata of the south- eastern San Joaquin Basin and its transition into We have studied detrital-zircon U-Pb age spectra and conglomerate clast The Sierra Nevada and Great Valley of California are structurally coupled the southern Sierra Nevada, California: Geosphere, populations from Neogene–Quaternary siliciclastic and volcaniclastic strata and move semi-independently within the San Andreas–Walker Lane dextral v. 12, no. 6, p. 1744–1773, doi:10.1130/GES01359.1. of the southeastern San Joaquin Basin, as well as a fault-controlled Neo- transform system as a microplate (Argus and Gordon, 1991; Unruh et al., 2003). gene basin that formed across the southernmost Sierra Nevada; we call this Regional relief generation and erosion of the Sierra Nevada are linked to sub- Received 9 May 2016 Accepted 31 August 2016 basin the Walker graben.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet Accompanying Microcopy No. 234 LETTERS RECEIVED BY
    NATIONAL ARCHIVES MICROFILM PUBLICATIONS Pamphlet Accompanying Microcopy No. 234 LETTERS RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, 1824-80 THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON: 1966 LETTERS RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF INDIAN AFFAIRS 182^-80 On the 962 rolls of this microfilm publication is reproduced the greater part of the correspondence re- ceived by the central office of the Bureau of Indian Af- fairs during the years 182^ through l880« The corre- spondence not included consists of letters and documents organized by the Bureau into various special series, which are discussed in more detail below. The Bureau of Indian Affairs was established within the War Department on March 11, l82lj, by order of Sec- retary of War John C. Calhoun (H. Doc. lU6, 1st sess., 19th Cong., p. 6). From 1789 until 182^ the administration of Indian Affairs had been under the direct supervision of the Secretary of War with the exception of the Government-, operated system of factories for trade with the Indians* From 1806 to 1822, the year of its abolition, this sys- tem was administered by a Superintendent of Indian Trade who was responsible to the Secretary of War. Six volumes of letters relating to Indian Affairs sent by the Sec- retary of War, l800-2lj, have been reproduced as Micro- film Publication 15- Letters sent by the Superintendent of Indian Trade from 1807 to 1822, also recorded in six volumes, with a seventh volume covering the office in liquidation after 1822, are reproduced as Microfilm Publication l6. The incoming letters of the Secretary of War relating to Indian affairs from 1800 to 182*4 are divided into three series.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ground-Water Features of the Edison-Maricopa Area Kern County, California
    Geology and Ground-Water Features of the Edison-Maricopa Area Kern County, California By P. R. WOOD and R. H. DALE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1656 Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Heater Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for tbis publication appears on page following tbe index. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract______________-_______----_-_._________________________ 1 Introduction._________________________________-----_------_-______ 3 The water probiem-________--------------------------------__- 3 Purpose of the investigation.___________________________________ 4 Scope and methods of study.___________________________________ 5 Location and general features of the area_________________________ 6 Previous investigations.________________________________________ 8 Acknowledgments. ____________________________________________ 9 Well-numbering system._______________________________________ 9 Geography ___________________________________________________ 11 Climate.__-________________-____-__------_-----_---_-_-_----_ 11 Physiography_..__________________-__-__-_-_-___-_---_-----_-_- 14 General features_________________________________________ 14 Sierra Nevada___________________________________________ 15 Tehachapi Mountains..---.________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Stations Monitored
    Stations Monitored 10/01/2019 Format Call Letters Market Station Name Adult Contemporary WHBC-FM AKRON, OH MIX 94.1 Adult Contemporary WKDD-FM AKRON, OH 98.1 WKDD Adult Contemporary WRVE-FM ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY 99.5 THE RIVER Adult Contemporary WYJB-FM ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY B95.5 Adult Contemporary KDRF-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 103.3 eD FM Adult Contemporary KMGA-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 99.5 MAGIC FM Adult Contemporary KPEK-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 100.3 THE PEAK Adult Contemporary WLEV-FM ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM, PA 100.7 WLEV Adult Contemporary KMVN-FM ANCHORAGE, AK MOViN 105.7 Adult Contemporary KMXS-FM ANCHORAGE, AK MIX 103.1 Adult Contemporary WOXL-FS ASHEVILLE, NC MIX 96.5 Adult Contemporary WSB-FM ATLANTA, GA B98.5 Adult Contemporary WSTR-FM ATLANTA, GA STAR 94.1 Adult Contemporary WFPG-FM ATLANTIC CITY-CAPE MAY, NJ LITE ROCK 96.9 Adult Contemporary WSJO-FM ATLANTIC CITY-CAPE MAY, NJ SOJO 104.9 Adult Contemporary KAMX-FM AUSTIN, TX MIX 94.7 Adult Contemporary KBPA-FM AUSTIN, TX 103.5 BOB FM Adult Contemporary KKMJ-FM AUSTIN, TX MAJIC 95.5 Adult Contemporary WLIF-FM BALTIMORE, MD TODAY'S 101.9 Adult Contemporary WQSR-FM BALTIMORE, MD 102.7 JACK FM Adult Contemporary WWMX-FM BALTIMORE, MD MIX 106.5 Adult Contemporary KRVE-FM BATON ROUGE, LA 96.1 THE RIVER Adult Contemporary WMJY-FS BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS MAGIC 93.7 Adult Contemporary WMJJ-FM BIRMINGHAM, AL MAGIC 96 Adult Contemporary KCIX-FM BOISE, ID MIX 106 Adult Contemporary KXLT-FM BOISE, ID LITE 107.9 Adult Contemporary WMJX-FM BOSTON, MA MAGIC 106.7 Adult Contemporary WWBX-FM
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California
    Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-C Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California By WILLARD W. DEAN fPith a section on GEOMORPHIC EFFECTS IN THE KERN RIVER BASIN By KEVIN M. SCOTT FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-C UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-610922 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 45 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract_____________________________________________________ Cl Introduction.____________ _ ________________________________________ 1 Acknowledgments. ________________________________________________ 3 Precipitation__ ____________________________________________________ 5 General description of the floods___________________________________ 9 Kern River basin______________________________________________ 12 Tule River basin______________________________________________ 16 Kaweah River basin____________________________--_-____-_---_- 18 Miscellaneous basins___________________________________________ 22 Storage regulation _________________________________________________ 22 Flood damage.__________________________________________________ 23 Comparison to previous floods___________-_____________--___------_
    [Show full text]