DOCSLIB.ORG

31295005720627.Pdf (2.638Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
31295005720627.Pdf (2.638Mb) VAGILITY AND LOCAL MOVEMENTS OF POCKET GOPHERS (THOMOMYS AND PAPPOGEOMYS) IN AN ÁREA OF SYMPATRY by STEPHEN LORY WILLIAMS, B.S. A THESIS IN ZOOLOGY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty o£ Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment o£ the Requirements for the Degree o£ MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved December, 1973 73 • 1973 l\)o.7j\S ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Cl-õp • ^ I extend my sincere appreciation to my major advisor, Dr. Robert J. Baker, for his advice, encouragement, and assistance with many aspects of this study. I am indebted to Dr. Hugh H. Genoways for generously providing time and suggestions applicable to this study, and to Dr. Joe R. Goodin for providing laboratory equipment for soil analyses. I am also grateful to Drs. Robert J. Baker, Hugh H. Genoways, Robert L. Packard, and Joe R. Goodin for their criticai reviews of this manuscript. Finally, I acknowledge with gratitude financial assistance provided by the International Center for Arid and Semi- arid Land Studies, the Theodore Roosevelt Fund, and the Organized Research Fund of Texas Tech University. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 11 LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. METHODS AND MATERIALS 3 III. RESULTS 13 IV. DISCUSSION 33 V. SUMMARY 43 LITERATURE CITED 45 111 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Pa;. 1. Aerial photograph of the study área .... 2. Data form used in recording captures ... 6 3. Individual movements of Pappogeomys castanops and Thomomys bottae in the study área 16 4. Distribution of Pappogeomys castanops and Thomomys bottae in the study área . 2 2 5. Distribution of Pappogeomys castanops and Thomomys bottae in the vicinity of the study área 24 6. Graphical representation of changes in mean soil moisture between June 1971 and May 1972 26 7. Extent of flooding in the study área on 23 August 1971 30 8. Burrow systems eroded by floods 32 V LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Sample sizes, means, ranges, and standard errors of movement data, grouped according to age, sex, and species .... 14 2. Leveis of significance and F values derived from comparisons õT movement data grouped according to age, sex, and species 15 IV INTRODUCTION Vagility, the potential or ability to disperse, is a characteristic influencing many biological aspects of a species. The rate and degree of population growth, gene flow, and morphological divergence are some features affected by vagility. Vagility, in turn, may be affected by gross morphology, behavior, physiology, natural history, and population dynamics of the species (Udvardy, 1969). Organisms with limited vagility encounter problems such as range expansion, maintenance of heterozygosity, and complete dependence on local environment. A group of mammals with low vagility are pocket gophers of the family Geomyidae (Patton ejt ai., 1972). These animais are specifically adapted to a herbivorous, fossorial habitus (Patton, 1972) and are restricted to a burrow system. Confinement to a burrow system obviously restricts the vagility of a species. The morphological adaptations of pocket gophers cause them to be awkward and vulnerable outside of their specific habitus. The location selected for this study was an área, described by Reichman and Baker (1972), where Thomomys bottae limpiae and Pappogeomys castanops pratensis occur sympatrically. This área is particularly applicable to this study because Reichman and Baker (19 72) had already noted movements occurring between these populations. In addition this locality was favorable because the habitat was relatively undisturbed, the áreas occupied by pocket gophers are restricted, and both genera could be studied simultaneously under similar environmental conditions. Because members of the family Geomyidae are not known to have subdivided the fossorial habitus (Russell, 1968), the role of vagility is particularly criticai when pocket gopher species are sympatric. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study was conducted 9.0 km N, 9.5 km E Fort Davis, Jeff Davis Co., Texas, between May 1971 and May 1973. Intensive live-trapping (Baker and Williams, 1972) was conducted in an área which extended 250 meters on either end of the zone of sympatry. Trapping was occasionally extended to other áreas to determine the local distribution of both species. Traps were set in áreas where recent mounding activity was indicated. An aerial photograph (Fig. 1), obtained from the Department of Interior Geological Survey, was used to map the zone of sympatry and plot individual capture sites. The distance and direction of any movement could be determined by plotting capture sites on the aerial photograph. This method of recording localities proved to be reasonably accurate (+^ five meters) and easily utilized. In addition, it minimized the problems of working large áreas with irregular terrain. Each pocket gopher captured in the study área was coded according to species (P = Pappogeomys; T = Thomomys), sex (d*;?), sequential collecting number, and age (A = adult; S = subadult, juvenile). Specimens were " p. Cd B o w p a> p ti Cd • o 4-> iH to CO t*^ 3 Oi to O Cd -P.£3 to ^ -H Ü PJ u 0) ,£3 D Cd +J •H <D B ,CJ.£3NO > P fH O Cd >>c tD ,£3 o >s Cd pí >^o Cd n:) Cd 3 P B p CO •HX to to O Cd Cd PU ^ u PU p4bO M-i Cd o to o >^ rH fH bo O Cd .£3 o <D 3 P^PU o* Cd o (D í-i.£3 * bO PU ^ H o o P to -H P 0'H U ^,£3 <l> B PUH P •H PJ -P HH Pj Cd v •H tom ü 0) o P o H P to C o O (ü B (-1 p .. 3 0 p Cd iH Pt PU Cd 3 Cd 0) u bo u Qco •H toe-clipped on the hind feet and released at the site of capture. The species, specimen Identification, sex, reproductive condition, age, molt, weight, burrow description, locality, and collector were recorded on a form used for each capture (Fig. 2). The design of this study incorporated the suggestions of Howard and Inglês (1951) concerning methods of studying fossorial mammals. Although soil type, burrow depth, and burrow diameter were recorded with each capture, excavation of burrow systems was restricted to preserve the habitat of the pocket gophers. The size and extent of burrow systems were determined indirectly by multiple trappings of individual pocket gophers. Sex was verified by checking the pubic symphysis, mammae, or baculum. Ascertaining the reproductive status of live animais in the field is difficult because observations are limited to externai criteria. In female pocket gophers, lactation, signs of nursing, pregnancy near parturition, and changes in the pubic symphysis were used as indicators of the reproductive status. In male pocket gophers, the position of the phallus and testes were noted but were recognized as possible invalid indications of reproductive condition (Miller, 1946). Age determination in both species was primarily based on pelage. Using pelage, individuais were 1 <9 z z <« 1 a: • >• -<1 ^ ^< RUJ 1- o ^ 1 z O z Ji z lü V) "è 15- HÜJ >. < O z~ 1- 3 1- z J 2 J -1 o S < CE CO < < 1 H UJ > P -•. O h- ÜE PH T 0^ ac UJ UJ UJ o LI o o 9 Q. < <»- _l' Z (/) z H > UI -J < ft» ^ X 1- >- o UI 2E C! 1 < < •H o < > -1 3 i w o Tí Ul 1 UJ ^1 1- UI Z O o 1 ã o a. O Lü ^1 ^ z z (U 8 s ã < z f-. J 5, < d i i • o i o -J 1 UJ <o í<Qn .1 £1 oZ UoI 1- oz 1- Ti <D >• o 0o0 (T< tcUJ zUJ £ ^ 1 < -1 > o K UI Z >• UJ z 1 z (/) < < 1 UJ < O 1 UJ (/) CO O <0 I o - C .. 5 z G O z z UI UJ 1 m UJ PUBI MAM PRE 1- 0. z z •M UJ o Q O 1 X) l BURROW o Z z < Q. ^— -^\ UJ • 11 1 J < Syi-\ ^ 3 -JZIZ f \ ^ I E D -» T bo P r T y •H MOL EVIDE SUBA JUVEN e ADUL < -—' o 2-, O (T ( - ^ UJ 5 z ^—2 — o s d u_ ^—, ' • </> o J m o •^ ^ z —^ identified as being a juvenile, subadult, or adult. More specific age determinations were not possible. Weights were not used because of their questioned validity (Hansen, 1960). The home range of pocket gophers is e^sentially restricted to the burrow system (Turner ejt ai., 1973; Wilks, 1963). Because this study is primarily concerned with dispersai tendencies beyond the burrow system the actual área of the home range, as treated by other investigators (Howard and Childs, 1959; Turner ejt ai. , 1973; Wilks, 1963), is not criticai. However, the size of the burrow system, or home range at any specific time, is important in differentiating movements within a single burrow system and movements into new áreas. Movements within a single burrow system could be eliminated if the maximum length for a burrow system was known. An estimate of the size of a burrow system was obtained for each species by determining the maximum distance between capture sites of any individual during a 24 hour period. This time limit was used because it is unlikely that an individual pocket gopher will move into a new área, establish its territory, and build a new burrow system within such a short period of time. Therefore, distances less than the length of a burrow system, as determined above, are considered to be movements within a single 8 burrow system, whereas greater distances are treated as movements into new áreas. This value is arbitrary and subject to error because the actual size of a burrow system cannot be accurately determined without excavating the burrow system or using radio-telemetry.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genetic Variation Within a Broadly Distributed Chewing Louse Genus (Thomomydoecus)
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Honors Program Theses Honors Program 2020 Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2020 Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Bruns, Clarissa Elizabeth, "Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus)" (2020). Honors Program Theses. 433. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/433 This Open Access Honors Program Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN A BROADLY DISTRIBUTED CHEWING LOUSE GENUS (THOMOMYDOECUS) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Designation University Honors with Distinction Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa May 2020 This Study by: Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Entitled: Genetic distribution within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) has been approved as meeting the thesis or project requirement for the Designation University Honors with Distinction ________ ______________________________________________________ Date James Demastes, Honors Thesis Advisor, Biology ________ ______________________________________________________ Date Dr. Jessica Moon, Director, University Honors Program Abstract No broad study has been conducted to examine the genetics of Thomomydoecus species and their patterns of geographic variation. Chewing lice and their parasite-host relationships with pocket gophers have been studied as a key example of cophylogeny (Demastes et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014
    Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 José Ramírez-Pulido, Noé González-Ruiz, Alfred L. Gardner, and Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales.0 Front cover: Image of the cover of Nova Plantarvm, Animalivm et Mineralivm Mexicanorvm Historia, by Francisci Hernández et al. (1651), which included the first list of the mammals found in Mexico. Cover image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University. SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 JOSÉ RAMÍREZ-PULIDO, NOÉ GONZÁLEZ-RUIZ, ALFRED L. GARDNER, AND JOAQUÍN ARROYO-CABRALES Layout and Design: Lisa Bradley Cover Design: Image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University Production Editor: Lisa Bradley Copyright 2014, Museum of Texas Tech University This publication is available free of charge in PDF format from the website of the Natural Sciences Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University (nsrl.ttu.edu). The authors and the Museum of Texas Tech University hereby grant permission to interested parties to download or print this publication for personal or educational (not for profit) use. Re-publication of any part of this paper in other works is not permitted without prior written permission of the Museum of Texas Tech University. This book was set in Times New Roman and printed on acid-free paper that meets the guidelines for per- manence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Printed: 18 September 2014 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 63 Series Editor: Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Taxonomy to Wildlife Research and Management Module Overview
    TheThe SpeciesSpecies QuestionQuestion ApplyingApplying TaxonomyTaxonomy ToTo WildlifeWildlife ResearchResearch AndAnd ManagementManagement September 1, 2006 Dear Educator, Colorado has long been committed to the conservation of all wildlife species, whether hunted, or fished, or viewed. One of the nation’s great wildlife restoration success stories—the American Peregrine Falcon—had its beginnings here in the early 1970’s. A Colorado biologist rappelled over cliffs more than 500 feet high, dangled from a thin rope and dodged swooping Peregrines to retrieve their DDT-thinned eggs. He tucked them into his vest and made all-night drives across the state for artificial incubation and hatching. Other successes, such as the restoration and recovery of prairie grouse, lynx, river otter and a number of native fishes, also have their roots in the efforts of Colorado Division of Wildlife professionals. Science-based management decisions are essential to securing species at risk, as well as conserving all the state’s wildlife species. The numbers of scientific disciplines that influence and inform wildlife management are staggering. Advances in taxonomy and molecular biology, in particular, have affected how biologists think about and identify species and subspecies. We invite you and your students to explore new developments in the frontiers of science with us as we harness innovative technologies and ideas and use them to maintain healthy, diverse and abundant wildlife. Sincerely, Bruce L. McCloskey Director Acknowledgments Funding for this project was provided by US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program Grant No. R-11-1, Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund (GOCO), and the sportsmen of Colorado. The Colorado Division of Wildlife gratefully acknowledges the following individuals: For content advice and critical review: Field-test Educators (cont.): Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Zp Rodent Bait Ag
    1 RESTRICTED USE PESTICIDE Due to Hazards to Non-target Species For retail sale to and use only by Certified Applicators or persons under their direct supervision and only for those uses covered by the Certified Applicator’s certification. ZP RODENT BAIT AG For use in rangeland, pastures, non-crop rights-of-way, alfalfa, timothy, barley, potatoes, wheat, sugar beets, sugarcane, grape vineyards, fruit and nut tree orchards, macadamia nut orchards, in and around buildings, and other sites to SPECIMENcontrol the species listed in the use directions . Active Ingredient Zinc Phosphide………………… 2.0% Other Ingredients…………………….. 98.0% Total…………………………… 100.0% KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION FIRST AID HAVE LABEL WITH YOU WHEN SEEKING TREATMENT ADVICE (1-877-854-2494) If you experience signs and symptoms such as nausea, abdominal pain, tightness in chest, or weakness, see a physician immediately.LABEL For information on health concerns, medical emergencies, or pesticide incidents, call the National Pesticide Information Center at 1-800-858-7378. IF SWALLOWED: Call a Poison Control Center, doctor, or 1-877-854-2494 immediately for treatment advice or transport the person to the nearest hospital. Do not give any liquid to the patient. Do not administer anything by mouth. Do not induce vomiting unless told to do so by the poison control center or doctor. IF ON SKIN OR CLOTHING: Take off contaminated clothing. Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15-20 minutes. Call a poison control center, doctor, or 1-877-854-2494 immediately for treatment advice. IF INHALED: Move person to fresh air.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA Evolution: a Comparison of the Cytochrome B and Cytochrome C Oxidase II Genes
    J Mol Evol (1995) 40:260-272 jouRA,oMOLECULAR VOLUTION © Springer-VerlagNew York Inc. 1995 Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA Evolution: A Comparison of the Cytochrome b and Cytochrome c Oxidase II Genes Rodney L. Honeycutt,1 Michael A. Nedbal, 1 Ronald M. Adkins, 1'* Laura L. Janecek 1'2 i Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 210 Nagle Hall, College Station, TX 77843, USA 2 Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC 29801, USA Received: 10 June 1994 / Accepted: 10 October 1994 Abstract. The evolution of two mitochondrial genes, Introduction cytochrome b and cytochrome c oxidase subunit II, was examined in several eutherian mammal orders, with spe- The mitochondrial cytochrome b (COB) and cytochrome cial emphasis on the orders Artiodactyla and Rodentia. c oxidase subunit II (COII) genes have been used in When analyzed using both maximum parsimony, with several recent molecular systematic studies of rodents either equal or unequal character weighting, and neigh- (DeWalt et al. 1993; Ma et al. 1993; Thomas and Martin bor joining, neither gene performed with a high degree of 1993), ungulates (Irwin et al. 1991; Irwin and Wilson consistency in terms of the phylogenetic hypotheses sup- 1992; Miyamoto et al. 1994), marine mammals (Irwin ported. The phylogenetic inconsistencies observed for and Arnason 1994), primates (Ruvolo et al. 1991; Diso- both these genes may be the result of several factors tell et al. 1992; Adkins and Honeycutt 1994), and euthe- including differences in the rate of nucleotide substitu- rian mammal orders (Adkins and Honeycutt 1991, 1993; tion among particular lineages (especially between or- Honeycutt and Adldns 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Gophers Habitat Modification
    Summary of Damage Prevention and Control Methods POCKET GOPHERS HABITAT MODIFICATION Rotate to annual crops Apply herbicides to control tap‐rooted plants for 2 consecutive years Flood land Rotate or cover crop with grasses, grains, or other fibrous‐rooted plants EXCLUSION Figure 1. Plains pocket gopher. Photo by Ron Case. Small wire‐mesh fences may provide protection for ornamental trees and shrubs or flower beds Plastic netting to protect seedlings Protect pipes and underground cables with pipes at least 3 inches in diameter or surround them with 6 to 8 inches of coarse gravel. FRIGHTENING Nothing effective REPELLENTS None practical Figure 2. Pocket gophers get their name from the pouches TOXICANTS on the sides of their head. Image by PCWD. Zinc phosphide Chlorophacinone OBJECTIVES 1. Describe basic pocket gopher biology and FUMIGANTS behavior 2. Identify pocket gopher signs Aluminum phosphide and gas cartridges 3. Explain different methods to control pocket gophers SHOOTING white, but generally align with soil coloration. The great variability in size and color of pocket gophers is Not practical attributed to their low dispersal rate and limited gene flow, resulting in adaptations to local TRAPPING conditions. Thirty‐five species of pocket gophers, represented by Various specialized body‐grip traps 5 genera occupy the western hemisphere. Fourteen Baited box traps species and 3 genera exist in the US. The major features differentiating these genera are the size of SPECIES PROFILE their forefeet, claws, and front surfaces of their chisel‐like incisors. Southeastern pocket gopher (Geomys pinetis) is the only species occurring in IDENTIFICATION Alabama. Pocket gophers are so named because they have fur‐ Geomys (Figure 3) have 2 grooves on each upper lined pouches outside of the mouth, one on each incisor and large forefeet and claws.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita Kenneth T
    CURRICULUM VITA KENNETH T. WILKINS Personal Faculty office: Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798-7388 (254) 710-2911, FAX: (254) 710-2969 Administrative office: Graduate School, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798-7264 (254) 710-3588, FAX: (254) 710-3870 e-mail: [email protected] Education B.S., Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, 1974 M.S., Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 1977 Ph.D., Zoology, University of Florida, 1982 Professional Experience Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, June 2006-present. Courses taught: Mammalogy, Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Biology, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured) and Interim Graduate Program Director (Biology), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, September 2003-May 2006. Courses taught: Mammalogy, Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Natural History, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, September 2000-2003. Courses taught: Mammalogy (taught in Waco and at Chapala Ecology Station in Mexico), Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Natural History, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of the Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, June 1998-2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodentia (Sciuromorpha and Castorimorpha) in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
    Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 640 Catalog of Type Specimens of Recent Mammals: Rodentia (Sciuromorpha and Castorimorpha) in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Robert D. Fisher and Craig A. Ludwig Contents INTRODUCTION 1 Type Categories Included 1 Organizatioii 2 Formant of Accounts 2 Approach 2 Acknowledgments 3 ÁCCOUNTS OF NAME-BEARING TYPE SPECIMENS 3 Suborder Sciuromorpha Brandt, 1855 3 Family Aplodontiidae Brandt, 1855 3 Genus Aplodontia Richardsoii, 1829 3 Family Sciuridae G. Fischer, 1814 3 Genus Aretes G. M. Alien, 1940 3 Genus Ammospermophilus Merriam, 1892 4 Genus Callosdurus Gray, 1867 4 Genus Callospermophilus, Merriam, 1897 10 Gemís Cynomys Rafinesque, 1817 11 Genus Dremomys Heude, 1898 11 Genus Exilisdurifs Moore, 1958 11 Genus Glaucomys Thomas, 1908 11 Genus Heliosdurus Trouessart, 1880 13 Genus Hylopetes Thomas, 1908 13 Genus Ictidomys ]. A. Alien, 1877 13 Genus lomys Thomas, 1908 14 Genus Lariscus Thomas and Wroughton, 1909 14 Genus Marmota Blumenbach, 1779 14 Gemís Menetes Thomas, 1908 15 Genus Microsdurus J. A. Alien, 'i 895 15 Genus Nannosdurus Trouessart, 1880 16 Genus Notodtellus A. H. Howell, 1938 16 Genus Otospermophilus Brandt, 1844 16 Genus Paraxerus Forsyth Major, 1893 17 Genus Petaurista Link, 1795 17 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY Genus Petinomys Thomas, 1908 17 Genus Prosciurillus Ellerman, 1947 17 Genus Protoxerus Forsyth Major, 1893 18 Genus Pteromys G. Cuvier, 1800 18 Genus Ratufa Gray, 1867 18 Genus Sdurus Linnaeus,
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Gopher? 3/1/09 7:52 Pm
    POCKET GOPHER? 3/1/09 7:52 PM An Excerpt from Jim Conrad's Naturalist Newsletter of January 28, 2008 issued from Mexico's Southernmost State, CHIAPAS POCKET GOPHER? Both the most exciting and most frustrating event of last week occurred Saturday morning when the firewood wardens brought me a critter they'd just found in one of the invaders' cornfields. The animal's top view is shown below: The much more interesting bottom view is shown at the right. Look at those cheek pouches! Obviously it's a rodent. I'm guessing that it's a pocket gopher, though I have no experience with such animals. What's frustrating http://www.backyardnature.net/chiapas/gopher.htm Page 1 of 3 POCKET GOPHER? 3/1/09 7:52 PM What's frustrating is that here I not only have no browsing access to the Internet, but also no field guides to remind me of the differences between plain gophers and pocket gophers, and what other closely related mammals exist. If you have a mammal field guide and possibly access to literature telling what gopher-type rodents are found down here, I'd love to hear from you. You can write to me at http://www.backyardnature.net/j/writejim.htm. The fellows spotted the critter hurrying across the ground but upon their approach it stopped and hunkered up, apparently "playing possum" by feigning death and thus maybe causing enemies to lose interest. When the wardens flipped over the animal green, compacted balls of clipped-off leaves fell from the cheek pouches.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Agriculture & Natural Resources
    UC Agriculture & Natural Resources Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference Title The pocket gopher as a pest in Mexico Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xm07244 Journal Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 17(17) ISSN 0507-6773 Authors Whisson, Desley A. Villa-C, Beatriz Publication Date 1996 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE POCKET GOPHER AS A PEST IN MEXICO DESLEY WIDSSON, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616. BEATRIZ VILLA-C, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-153, Coyoacan, 04510 Mexico, D.F. ABSTRACT: Pocket gophers of the genus Orthogeomys and Pappogeomys are major pests in rangeland and agricultural areas throughout Mexico. Control relies on the indiscriminate use of fumigants and poison baits. These controls are applied in a haphazard manner; do not provide long-term benefits and the non-target hazards and public safety risks are perceived to be extremely high. Studies indicate that as a result of reinvasion of treated areas or territory expansion of animals surviving the control procedure, controls relying on removal of animals may be limited unless applied at frequent (every three months or less) intervals. KEYWORDS: Pappogeomys merriami merriami, Geomyidae, Rodentia, pocket gophers, Mexico, damage, control methods Proc. 17th Venebr. Pest Conf. (R.M. Timm & A.C. Crabb, Eds.) Published at Univ. of Calif., Davis. 1996. INTRODUCTION information on the activity and impacts of pocket gophers The creation of large cultivated areas, the change in in rangeland, a study of the species Pappogeomys soil conditions and a reduction in the number of natural merriami merriami was initiated in 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • MF770 Managing Pocket Gophers
    Pocket gophers are burrowing rodents that live almost entirely underground. These medium-sized rodents are approximately 9 to 12 inches long and weigh 7 to 14 ounces. They are named pocket gophers because of their large and external fur-lined cheek pouches, one on either side of the mouth. These patches or pockets are used for carrying food. Gophers have powerfully built forequarters with large claws Managing on their front feet, a short neck, external ears, small eyes, and lips that close behind their large incisors. Their fine soft fur Pocket ranges in color from dark brown to nearly white. Gophers Two species of pocket when it is green and succulent. gophers are found in Kansas. The plains pocket gopher The plains pocket gopher prefers succulent forbs in Charles Lee Wildlife Specialist (Geomys bursarius) is dis- spring and summer but also Kansas State University tributed throughout Kansas feeds on grasses – alfalfa and except for the southeastern dandelions are preferred by quarter. The yellow-faced pocket gophers. Occasionally pocket gopher (Pappogeomys trees and shrubs are clipped castanops) is found only in a just above ground, especially limited part of southwest- under snow cover. ern Kansas. Distinguishing Biology, Reproduction, and between the two species is Behavior rather easy, the plains pocket gopher has two grooves on the Pocket gophers construct midline of the paired upper burrow systems by loosening incisors, while the yellow- the soil with their claws and faced pocket gopher has one incisors. The gophers then groove. Most species are about use their forefeet and chest the same size. to push soil out of the bur- Pocket gophers obtain the row.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Species of the World Literature Cited
    Mammal Species of the World A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference Third Edition The citation for this work is: Don E. Wilson & DeeAnn M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed), Johns Hopkins University Press, 2,142 pp. (Available from Johns Hopkins University Press, 1-800-537-5487 or (410) 516-6900 http://www.press.jhu.edu). Literature Cited Abad, P. L. 1987. Biologia y ecologia del liron careto (Eliomys quercinus) en Leon. Ecologia, 1:153- 159. Abe, H. 1967. Classification and biology of Japanese Insectivora (Mammalia). I. Studies on variation and classification. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 55:191-265, 2 pls. Abe, H. 1971. Small mammals of central Nepal. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 56:367-423. Abe, H. 1973a. Growth and development in two forms of Clethrionomys. II. Tooth characters, with special reference to phylogenetic relationships. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 57:229-254. Abe, H. 1973b. Growth and development in two forms of Clethrionomys. III. Cranial characters, with special reference to phylogenetic relationships. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 57:255-274. Abe, H. 1977. Variation and taxonomy of some small mammals from central Nepal. Journal of the Mammalogical Society of Japan, 7(2):63-73. Abe, H. 1982. Age and seasonal variations of molar patterns in a red-backed vole population. Journal of the Mammalogical Society of Japan, 9:9-13. Abe, H. 1983. Variation and taxonomy of Niviventer fulvescens and notes on Niviventer group of rats in Thailand.
    [Show full text]